this is a very nice version of the lorenz but i have a question is the camera at a fixed point or did something just happen at the end due to just random probability? because it seemed to go very havoc and unusual at the end? also what is the song played in the backround?
Yes, camera is fixed, and this thing rotates, as I raise a step size parameter from very small when it is identical to original Lorenz attractor, to rather huge when it is entirely unlike original. I normalize the dx,dy,dz vector and multiply by that parameter.
Music: Debussy, Reverie. Set with AudioSwap .
You might like my new renderer for similar things - now in colour, and interactive (see link with info).
It depends on the ramifications that feynman talked about after he released his 3rd lecture. As if space time bends then the attractor will ain more parameters.
Dmytry didn't answer, but I think its a safe assumption that the "glow" is due to a light scattering equation. Dmytry has done with with volume rendering in the past, and it involves light scattering.
Look up the "Schlick phase function" for more info. Definitely a very cool addition to the typical strange attractor rendering.
endless energy......
pupskannake 1 year ago
whats that gizzmo
club4ghz 1 year ago
I love the song, I played it on the flute with my dad accompanying :) And I have no idea what this is, but it's really pretty xD
TheSilta 1 year ago
This is beautiful!
danielodors 2 years ago
this is a very nice version of the lorenz but i have a question is the camera at a fixed point or did something just happen at the end due to just random probability? because it seemed to go very havoc and unusual at the end? also what is the song played in the backround?
bachar18 2 years ago
Yes, camera is fixed, and this thing rotates, as I raise a step size parameter from very small when it is identical to original Lorenz attractor, to rather huge when it is entirely unlike original. I normalize the dx,dy,dz vector and multiply by that parameter.
Music: Debussy, Reverie. Set with AudioSwap .
You might like my new renderer for similar things - now in colour, and interactive (see link with info).
dizekat 2 years ago
what software did u use to plot?
goldmn480 3 years ago
this looks like a spring of energy (spring theory)
mehy 4 years ago
String Theory, you mean?
ChaosTheorist917 2 years ago
oops, you're wright.
btw, good work Dmytry !
mehy 2 years ago
It depends on the ramifications that feynman talked about after he released his 3rd lecture. As if space time bends then the attractor will ain more parameters.
DorianHouse 4 years ago
very nice, i wonder about the set of paramters that do not converge to an attractor and whether that set is dense or not like a cantor dust
MathDemos 4 years ago 2
oha
ReDRunAir 4 years ago
Dmytry didn't answer, but I think its a safe assumption that the "glow" is due to a light scattering equation. Dmytry has done with with volume rendering in the past, and it involves light scattering.
Look up the "Schlick phase function" for more info. Definitely a very cool addition to the typical strange attractor rendering.
Correct me if I'm wrong, Dmytry.
Kaervos1024 5 years ago
Yes, its similar to light scattering. I added it to visualize brightness better, so that you naturally see out of range bright spots as bright.
dizekat 2 years ago
Nice! Cool variation on Lorenz. Is the apparent "glow" a post-processing effect, or inherent in the attractor itself?
davebollinger 5 years ago
beautiful!
dswex 5 years ago
i agree
dswex 4 years ago