Added: 4 years ago
From: WelcomeToKilltown
Views: 106,986
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (353)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Kool

  • BS man BS

  • what the hell is this supposed to mean and it 757 hit it not a 747 dumbass

  • @benry200 Actually it was a 767, dumbass.

  • @Qwerty102964 no it was a 767 and a 757 dumbass

  • @benry200 So we were both right, dumbass

  • Seriously.... Are you a moron? be honest...

  • The uploader is a moron - he really is suggesting everyone who witnessed the crashes simply imagined it.

  • I actually used to crash in the twin towers on flightsim 2000.. never did it after the actuall attackk tho.. : S

  • GOOD VIDEO!

    Ps. Don't care about all those trolls

  • is this all you bought this fucking game for? just to melt into the WTC? show some respect, more than 1000 people died in 9/11 jackass!

  • Good job. Looks just as real as the mainstream news' cartoons of that day.

  • How can an aluminium plane disappear through solid mild steel??

  • @mikepearcey First of all... I think you mean "milled steel".... second, are you a fucking idiot?

  • did you get could have done better on your school reports?

  • Sure looks alot alike.

  • So a "simulation" that is not capable of or even ment to show a crash just looks like the crash on 9/11....

    So what you are saying is that it was fake then ?

  • if I'm not mistaken I see a four engine jet, but the only planes who hit the wtc were 767's and they have to engines. Maybe you've got the angle right but not the plane.

  • @TheConcordeman That's assuming that 767s hit the WTC. The point of the video is to demonstrate that the 9/11 crash video do not observe any crash physics, just like this flight sim.  The reason being obvious, the crash videos are fake. No planes struck the WTC.

  • @ImyManz99 umm, i kinda saw it with my own eyes, being as i was there and saw the 2nd plane hit... dummy

  • @ndgambella You didn't see squat except for what you were fed on TV. What were you doing in Manhattan at the time and what was your location? Yeah, I know you probably won't answer those questions like most "youtube 9/11 witnesses", so why don't you take a hike.

  • The creator of this video need to slap themselves for creating this..

  • this is not real......this is a remake,with computer

  • @Benzedirk2012 No shit!

  • i would love to push you off that building

  • @daveygravey123456

    That wouldn't be a very steep drop.

  • Sick Fuck

  • well, thats the way a plane should crash into a building, dont you think?

  • you are a stupid you use a 747 and they were 767-200 and you are a fucking asshole you dont joke with that

  • @NOG1997 it's not a joke m8

  • wat the fuck i have flight simulator and this video makes me want to throw it out so i wont run into you online you are disgrace to america and need to leave it.

  • @bobilla223 the MEDIA is a disgrace to america!

    that's why these videos are made.

    THE MEDIA AIRED FRAUDULENT IMAGERY DURING A BREAKING NEWS STORY!!!! that is a proven fact...(911 amateur pt 2, september clues)

    turns out the whole thing was a fucking fairytale!

    yeah, they got their building complex demolished, they got the gold, and they pulled off the MADE FOR TV PSYOP...for a while that is.

    now the 911 researchers have been uncovering FAKE VICTIMS!

    911 memorial scam clones

    911 honor the vicsims

  • WHat I would really like to see is a reconstruction of a couple of floors of the WTC using the same materials, steel, concrete and all and then launch an airliner at it along a track to see what would happen. Would an aluminium tube filled with fuel travelling at around 500mph pass through the outer skin like tissue paper or would it crumple into it and fall down? Any multi millionaires out there wanting to give it a try?

  • To be polite, I don't really see how you can possibly hope to prove anything with this. An airliner traveling at that speed would pretty much disintegrate or 'melt' into a hollow object like a building. The reason it looked strange is that it was bloomin strange! 767 colliding with skyscraper at 500kts? Unfortunately it's not a test carried out by Boeing or Airbus so we don't have any data to compare the 9/11 incident with.

  • 9/11 was an inside job but the media sucks obamas knob

  • you are a moron do you have any concept of kinitics?? Do you have any credible training in accident reconstruction? I suspect you spend most of your time playing video games and playing with your balls hoping one day to get out of your parents basement and finding a women.

  • @codaydecoy2009 point is that the crashing of planes on wtc on 9/11 may b planned by this game!!!!!

    look how same the same way it crashes......

  • Huge fat plane traveling at 350 mph will easily glid through any glass structure.

  • @NoogahOogah, except the glass structure was held up with massive steel columns right up the outside of the building.

  • WTF  more stupidity

  • 1 FPS! Yay!!...

  • Are you conspiracy theorists fucking stupid? Of course it "melted" not the building, WTF do you expect?, crash-resistance, crumpling, evidence of impact?

    the WTC was stationary, the planes where moving at around 470mph. When that happens, the stationary object loses all strength and the moving object turns as hard as a bullet.

    like if you throw a snow-ball at a brick wall, because the snow-ball is moving and the brick-wall is still, the snow-ball goes straight through, duh!

    oh, wait a minute

  • dude why are you flying a 707 or a 747?

  • Then stfu and dont message me again. OK?!

  • this plane has 2 engine on each wing so it can not so doing with 11 sept because that was an 767and those plane has 2 engine on each wing also the 777

  • @TWILIGHT275,that's what i want to say.infact there was no passenger at all the the 'hijacked' planes.i can believe there may be planes which hit pentagon and pensylvania, but no deadbody indeed found. if found then there would be spectators who would see it..like other plane crashes.because it's FBI who reached the place very fast and SNATCHED all the photos and videos of nearby shops,hotels.thus we don't know much about pentagon. but we have rights 2 see,don't we?i also want the truth prevail

  • @WarNerd16 U DICKLESS RETARD GO FUCK OWN ASS

  • @WarNerd- u are a dickless retard..go blow own ass....then taste how to test own terrorism , i'm not terrorist.

  • u have a vid of a 747 crashing into the wtc

    YOU ARE A TERRORIST!! if your not...prove me wrong

  • how can a building come down in a free fall rate ? there was no "jet fuel" in building 7....there was no hijacking in pentagon....how can all these happen?

  • @MrREZWAN building 7 fell cause bricks and material from twin towers fell on ti weakining it.

  • lol......so a steel building became weaken?okzz..what about pentagon? any deadbody u 've been able to show? because hijacked plane entered so there should be deadbodies..isn't it? or your 'jet fuel' has vanished them now?

  • @MrREZWAN the pentagon partly exploded and the south west side, 158 died and it happend 10 minutes after the other airplane hit thw twin towers south tower. everyone on the plane dead and yes they have gathred dead bodied but did not show them

  • @TWILIGHT275, every moment of twin tower was seen through lens...even the people jumping.....but for pentagon..who saw the dead bodies...accept the govrnment officials? not only pentagon, about pensylvania too. people would have seen the deadbodies if they were real planes.couldn't because they were missiles, not planes.otherwise it would match with plane accident. i don't believe anything 'reported' by government...i trust only graphic proof

  • @MrREZWAN no body saw any dead bodies from the plane that hit in pensylvania, the pentagon had dead bodies, they showed them in pictures covered up. no one else saw the dead bodies, the plane that hit a field in pensylvania tired to hit the u.s capital building...the bodies are buried from the attack

  • @MrREZWAN

    "how can a building come down in a free fall rate ?"

    This is the most common twoofer lie. NONE of the buildings fell at freefall, and that's a fact. You're lying, because you didn't bother to fact check your dumb conspiracy videos.

  • NIST ADMITS FREE FALL

  • ur a terrorist bastard go die in a hole

  • Comment removed

  • @WarNerd -"u are a terrorist....if not then prove me wrong!!"LMFAO!!

    i am one of the candidates who is supposed to be your father....try to prove it false if u can!!

  • your soooooo funny!! ha ha! other then the fact that my father lives in my house then i totally beleve you!!!!

  • @WarNerd-LMFAO!!

    ARE U MAD? WHAT I AM TALKING AND U ARE TALKING ABOUT!! LOL

  • The front facade of the building would have crumbled under the immense force/pressure it was under and the steel beams would have given way to allow the aircraft to "penetrate" the building. Lets not forget that although an aircraft is made out of alot of aluminium, there are still components made out of titanium, steel, ceramics etc etc.

    I'm sorry, but the no planes theory does not hold up WRT this.

    Unfortunately no matter what I or others say will make no difference. We're always wrong... :/

  • Did some working out here. A 5.56mm Nato FMJ round weighing approximately 4g has enough energy (E=1/2mv^2) to scratch/dent a steel beam (approx 1762.2Joules). If we take Flight 175 for example, with a reported speed of 580mph and mass of 132,880kg (took off 10,000 as a guesstimate for fuel burn). We get a figure approximately 4,388,295,560Joules. Worth over a ton of TNT. Not including the detonation of the fuel.

    Newtons Laws at work. What you saw is exactly what you could expect to happen.

  • @wranga1app - Thank you for completely owning every twoofer nut that whines about this being 'physically impossible' and then refuses to post any calculations.

  • Most guys who work on their car own a trolley jack. Most trolley jacks are made of steel and are heavy. Imagine throwing a trolley jack at a 767, the trolley jack would go straight through the aluminium skin and ruin the plane. Now try to set fire to the trolley jack using kerosene (parrafin) good luck getting it to "weaken" or "melt". On 9/11, the worlds biggest trolley jacks (WTC 1&2) were cut into pieces by aluminium and caught fire and "weakened" and "fell" into pieces. What a joke.

  • the joke is that you believe in a conspiracy, the buildings werent cut into pieces by the planes, burning jet fuel leaked down the elevator shafts to the core columns and the southwest corner of the tower weakened significantly, and then the other side weakened, which caused an implosion, proven by MIT, Harvard University, Purdue University, and NIST, who do you have for proof: Jones, Gage, Bermas, and Avery, i laugh at you, you are a joke

  • MrTm1314, I think you'll find that it's you that is the conspiracy nutjob, ie 19 hijackers with box cutters, aluminium slicing through construction steel, kerosene melting steel, Newton's laws of motion suspended for a day, planes melting into buildings, etc. etc. Conspiracy nutjobs like yourself probably think Buzz Lightyear is a real actor too. I don't believe in conspiracy's, I believe in physics.You don't know your ass from your elbow son.

  • if u believed in physics then you would know tht im right, and tht steel doesnt need to melt for structural failure, and wat conspiracy do i believe in?

  • Steel buildings don't explode (or melt for that matter) because of a petrol fire. Laughable ... and I believed it for over two years after.

    FEMA says the center of the WTC towers was hollow ... just fucking wrong. There's a reason over 700 architects and engineers are calling for answers. As though we're all just dumb ...

  • the pros already saide the plane couldnt even go fast up to 500 speed and beyond with out breaking up plus its the simple fact that the planes melt wen they shud have crushd like cans does a penny melt into the ground and fall all the way through.......something special happen that day u or no one can deny it....the shadow

  • is 767 and 757 not four engine

  • Comment removed

  • Mythbusters once did a test to see if a penny could go through your skull after dropping it from a tall building. However, due to air resistance, it only went 60-70 mph, not enough to kill you. However, thanks for being someone who is actually NOT a conspirator.

  • Ty dude, these idiots thumbed down my comment. I love mythbusters and compared to the conspirators, these guys have proof.

    Maybe the penny thing was wrong, but you have to admit it couldn't be an inside job.

  • No worries, I'm not a nutjob conspiracy theorist. They can screw themselves for all I care, all they care about is trying to get fame and trying to find new ways to blame the government for every single problem. Or that everything is a hoax, still perpetrated by the government. They are such douchebags.

  • Thanks dude.

    Anyway, this has nothing to do but just wanted your opinion.

    What is your opinion on the Illuminati thing going on?

    What do you think really went on with Michael Jackson's life?

    Whatever your opinion is I value it, cause lately I haven't been able to find a good answer.

    If you always listen to the idiots around you, you become one of them even if you had no intention of becoming one.

  • @SciGuy013 WE ARE NOT NUT JOBS,,,,,,,,,WE WANT THE TRUTH,,,,,,,,,BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUTH IN AIRPLANES SEEMLESSLY GLIDING THROUGH STEEL STRUCTURES,,,,,,,,THERE IS NO TRUTH IN STEEL COLLAPSING IN ON ITSELF AT NEARLY FREEFALL SPEED,,,,,,,,,AND THERE IS NO TRUTH IN SHITTY ARAB PILOTS BEING ABLE TO HAND FLY,,,,,,,,BLIND WITH NO AIR TRAFFIC HELP,,,,,,,DIRECTLY INTO THE TWIN TOWERS,,,,,,,THESE ARE LIES MY FRIEND ,,,,,,,LET'S FIND THE TRUTH

  • @SciGuy013 you're SO right, they are such "douchebags".

    Not you though, you are clever like me and understand how to make sweeping statements to declare "them" as a group, then focus on their most kooky and fringe beliefs (such as "reptilians" then pretend the confusing stuff like this "TVfakery" is the same sort of thing)

    Or the inconsistencies in the theories of only the very most stupid of them, & expand their significance to your version of your opponent's argument.

    I also like your hair

  • how do you get flight simalator

  • It was a hoax.

  • plain = plane, learn to spell and get an education. LOL

  • Your the dumbfuck if you belive that. there is no way them wings would have sliced through steel. they would have broke off. id defies logic and physics

  • hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.foo­l.

  • lol. its full of bullshit. science and logic says.. the plane would have exploded against the tower. and not go through comin out the other side. idiot

  • What kind of science would that be? The bullshit science? Educate yourself kid.

  • so if it wasn't a plane, what was it?

  • The hint is in the last part of the title: "just like in Flight Simulator"

  • @WelcomeToKilltown so, that explosion i saw, with my own two eyes, was a computer graphic. ah, of course.

  • @mathewkrill Who said anything about the explosions being fake?

  • @WelcomeToKilltown ever heard of sarcastic humour?

  • well its hard to say, some people reprted a large plane, (mostly media employees) some saw a military plane hit. some saw a missile. and some claim they heard nothing exept explosion. so who to belive?

  • i don't know, i remember seeing a normal looking plane from my window. maybe i'm just biased because i saw it with my own eyes.

  • i smell bullshit. go on camera saying you saw a plane hit.

  • i don't get why i have to go on camera.

    and i don't understand why you think it's bullshit either.

  • i just find it hard to belive that the planes wings sliced through them thick steel towers. not possible

  • why not? do you think plane wings are weak? going 600mph? wow, some people have no use of their brain

  • the wings ARE weak. a little bum by anything and they will rip off. and who said the plane was going 600mph? at that altitude the plane couldnt reach that speed. more like 250-350.

  • the nist report said FLT 175 was traveling @ 590MPH. just becuase they are wings doesnt make them weak, if a ground strike to a wing doesnt take it off or even get close to it, then why couldnt it cut through a few steel columns at 600mph. you make no sense, and YES a plane with the power of a 767 can indeed reach ~600mph at around 1,000ft, after a decent such as FLT 175. you sir are a troll so i will not be bothering you anymore, good day!

  • planes wont hit that speed at 1,000ft sorry. fool!

  • FEMA Report of Flight 175

    590 mph / 514 knots / M0.771

    Like stated before you competence is that of a squirrel.

    Please stop trolling before you hurt your tiny brain

  • lol, i dont care if it says that, ITS NOT POSSIBLE. watch 9/11 continious pieces by jeff hill (pumpitout). flight 175 would have been intercepted in the real world. but none of them were.. wonder why.

  • troll alert, you cant win this argument. i know more about aviation than you ever will

  • Of course you do. thats why you see nothing wrong with the videos lol. fool!

  • troll

  • Um, just because the plane's altitude is low doesn't mean it has to go slow. I've seen with my own eyes jets at airshows traveling at 500+ mph barely 500 ft off the ground.

  • @SciGuy013 thats airshows, the FAA regs below 250 kts at below 10thousand

  • This wasn't regulates by the FAA, it was a terrorist act.

  • lol, not a 767-400 with cargo and crew and passengers. this is simple math. 100,000 lbs of thrust pushes this plane a max cruising speed of 568mph at 35,000ft. the air at 1,000ft. is over 5 times as dense as it is at 35,000ft. hence the plane would have to muster up more than 5 times its maximum power to achieve these speeds. i didn't see any extra engines on board...did you???

  • You do know that 90% of the towers steel supports were in the middle of the tower right? Not around the sides of the building.... Most of that was concrete and drywall, so yes it was completely possible for a planes wings to cut through a building like that.

  • Bullshit! and yes 90% in the middle. but somehow they still fell to the floor in 10 seconds? hmmmm. it was all a false flag op. shock and awe for us to support this sham of a war.

  • you know how much steel cloumns and girders that thing smacked into> >? I didint think so im a ironworker and the res enough steel in them to stop a flying steel tank -this is all so fucking bullshit

  • Go take a look at the towers blueprints and then rethink your statement.

  • ill get right on it

  • can i correct u, most of it was dry wall, not concreate, only the core of the building was concreate in the derict center

  • Hail comrade @mathewkrill,

    A missile

  • HA!!!!! on the outside??? AAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH BAHHAHAH

  • According to Isaac Newtons 3rd Law of Motion yes....

    Why is it on one day..that day we are supposed to ignore the laws of physics and simply accept what we were told.

    Those planes hitting the building are CGI composites. You can see, just on the face of it ..it's apparent to my five year old Why can't you see it?

  • @Truther nutjobs

    What is the plane supposed to do, douchebags. Bounce off??

  • some of the plane should bounce off of course lol. wings for sure. and a huge fire ball upon impact and not inside lol

  • what about its speed?

  • what about the speed?

  • if some thing is moving at the speed of a bullet, its going to go through

  • Not when that something is aluminum. 40 ft. tail should break away. Wings should break away. Engines should turn into catapulting death machines.... Etc Etc. When aluminum meets steel at any speed which one wins??? Tell you this, it doesn't cut right through as the media wants us to believe...

  • wow so that explains it! since the planse disappera into the building in a game, must mean thats how it really happens! your a dumb ass retard. fukin stupid loser

  • its called clipping you morons

  • this is absolute proof !, i dont need any more evidence, the tower was clearly never there in the first place.

  • retarded idiot ok the plane "melted" beacause when u are going 0.84 mach your plane isnt made to plow to a buliding dude u dont no wat ure talking about but everone else does

  • wow, you idiots are still clinging to a conspiracy theory? thank god for youtube or you would all be chatting up you rhetoric on short wave from mommys basement.

  • Too many unanswered questions to look past, I guess you dont see them on news channels that are all on the CIA payroll though.

  • dude thats becauseflight simulater sucks balls and the plane is going through the tower!

  • Maj. Gen. David F. Wherley Jr., who died along with his wife and seven others in Monday's tragic crash of two Metrorail trains in Washington, D.C., was the one who ordered fighter jets over the Capitol during the September 11, 2001 terror attacks.

    I guess the General will never be called to the Witness Stand if Obama had the Balls to investigate 911 and what really happened. We all know the generals GPS on cell could never let somebody in Virginia see where he was for a convieniant "accident".

  • kool

  • youtube';s been hijacked. It's being censored, it;s being manipulated. And the shills are working around the clock to scew YOUR opinions!

  • 100% true, more and more trolls on Youtube. The government must be shitting it's pants right now...people all over the world are PISSED OFF, and the elite know this!

  • this almost looks as real as the 911 'attacks' view my uploads

  • Search for "Scenario 12d"

    and

    watch?v=f7HdbU5KXwY

  • It's an endless war machine that needs feeding..."Beware of the military industrial complex" Eisenhower warned us.

    He saw what nazism did and the results.

  • maybe al quaida or somebodyplanted explosive on the towers aswell or somebody on the inside did. i cant see why america would want to destroy its world trade centers. it lost them alot of money. you cant say it was so they could go to iraq and get money from the oil either because everybody knows that war costs alot of money. america also knew the taliban and al quaida are good at fighting wars.u.s.a worked wth thm when they were fighting russia in the 80's the war that killed the soviet union.

  • I agree completely, but I still think that says far more about the individual's state of mind, (i.e.; religious indoctrination, the things we are sheltered from, told are bad, never see). I knew a guy, who would watch autopsies while eating, I couldn't, nor would I ever want to, but he always told me, it's all in your head.

  • One thing that has to be accepted is that america is all about money.

    DO you realise how much money has been made from 9/11?

    obviously they didnt just do it for that

    but it might well have been a motive

  • "america is all about money"

    Yeah, as opposed to all those other countries that don't give a shit about money.

    They're the ones standing in line with their hands out for US and UN (same thing) dollars.

    Fuck the lot of them. The next time there's a major tsunami or devastating earthquake, let the bastards try to get China or Italy to bail their sorry asses out.

  • wtc was a white elephant. it was losing money and tenants. Removing the asbestos was going to cost MEGABUCKS. It was expensive to ventilate.Besides, the corporations that got contracts for the wars made HUGE, and it's the common taxpayer flipping the bill for the war..Maybe you should rethink your stance,bucko.(and do alot more research.)

  • It really is only in america people do not seem capable of seeing the obvious, such as the WTC7 demolition.

  • The buildings would not fall down like that. If the heat were to melt this steel. It woulda been melting only a certain part on the floors. Not the FULL floor. With that in mind, when collapse happens.. One side would fall first. That's not how it worked. It fell like pancakes. Precision fall like it did is completely mind blowing. A couple days before this happened, why did they pull security from the WTC's? Someone answer that question! Please.

  • "The buildings would not fall down like that. If the heat were to melt this steel."

    too bad you can't find a single structural engineer or fire engineer who agrees with you.

    They all say that plane impacts & uncontrolled fires brought down the towers.

    MIT, Purdue, Univ of Sydney, Univ of Manchester, UCBerkely, Jouirnal of Structural Mechanics, STRUCTURE magazine ...

    but some high school dropout asshole like you knows more than they do, right?

    read something besides loony websites.

  • Steven Jones Physics professor BYU..

    Thermite was used, 100% Inside job...and that's just at the top of my head... there are thousands more...too bad your propaganda is not working

  • "Steven Jones Physics professor BYU"

    You mean FIRED professor Jones, canned because he published an engineering paper that he was afraid to get peer-reviewed?

    The one whom his own engineering dept said they couldn't support at all?

    You're as big a moron as he is.

    When his thermite crap got laughed at too long, he now changed it to nanothermite.

    He tried for years to demonstrate that thermite could cut structural steel when it's vertical, failed miserably.

    Find another imaginary device.

  • they fired him because he spoke the truth...you twist the truth for your own purposes...LIAR

  • "you twist the truth for your own purposes"

    So -- are YOU going to show us a video of thermite cutting some vertical structural steel?

    Or are you just another whining pussy who believes in magical shit he's never seen?

  • they're all over the net smartpants. Just go do some research instead of just making things up

  • This guy is a moron, just ignore him. He has no proof. This is in regards to Xandrino.

  • LAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!

  • No-Plane theories were created by CIA Counter-Intelligence to make 9/11 Truth look stupid.

    Watch this comment get deleted...

  • "No-Plane theories were created by CIA Counter-Intelligence to make 9/11 Truth look stupid"

    That happened a long time before the no-planers came along.

    They're all bozos on that bus.

  • What about the bozos who still blame Bin Laden, when the FBI and Justice Dept. have yet to indict him for 9/11?

  • dude please. shut the fuck up. the no-plane theory is not a theory. it is a fact and its called a discovery. quit listening to idiots like alex jones u fucking dumbass.

  • "the no-plane theory is not a theory"

    No, it's a delusion so absurd that even 90% of the truthers are embarrassed by it.

    But there are always a few bottomfeeders that just aren't happy with being only half-nuts.

    Most of 'em can't spell or write, I notice.

  • its a fact? you need proof to call it a fact

    imagine if you were in charge of the FBI. yud arrest whoever the fuck you felt like because you think it sounds reasonable that they commited a crime, and yud call it fact. thank god the smart people have all the important jobs, and bottom feeders like you glue to youtube complaining about an inside job

  • I think the elite are sitting back with a good chuckle over how easy it is to fool so many, so compleatly, so simply. Do not be dismayed at the disbelief. They can not help themselves. Ever heard of the Sound of Silence? go to web and see; Digital TV - mind control the Sound of Silence. Television, radio, any sound wave system emits a low frequency transmision undetectable to the human ear. Like a dogs silent whisle,  We don't here it but yet it's there. This is the sound of Silence.

  • Absolutely rubbish it was too repetative and it was really rubbish picture

  • I know this is fake because the planes that crashed into the tower, only had 2 engines. one on each side. that plane has 4 engines, 2 on each side.

  • Think aluminum can against concrete wall. It would have splashed against the side. 240 steel perimeter colums. And somehow the plane made it through both sides of the south tower.