*sigh* Denying the enemy the use of an expended one-shot weapon. That's like denying the enemy a broken waterbottle cause he might fill it with water. Except that since it's broken, it already leaks. Morons.
@arcaion rofl thats not even close the at4 cost $1,480 if your thinking javelin that is $143,358 for the tube. and for each missle of the javelin that is $86,014 nothing near a 1.4 mill
The fucking missile was already fired, the tube can't be reused. They were destroying it so some towelhead didn't come along and make an IED out of it....try to actually research something before bitching about it....
the marines aint taking shyt back with fallen troops abu musab alzarqawi had a m249 that he got from a fallen soldier terrorist got m16s too im pretty sure
Anybody can still use that tube for IED/EFP's. Why the hell are they dumping it anyhow? They need to take it with them. That's the smart thing to do and that's what the Marines are doing.
majormayhem1 you are retarded, the weight difference between a loaded and alreay spent AT4 would be way different so it wouldn't be hard to tell the difference.
@TaintedMojo They use em to hide grenades, then when unsuspecting jow pick it up to see if its useful after sighting it in a house against the wall, 5 pinless grenades fall out. Or they just throw another rocket in it and use our own accurate weapon against us.
No... no, you're right, they shouldn't care about one tube... and they shouldn't care about all the chinooks, apaches, and blackhawks being destroyed by rebels, the on ly thing they should focus on is getting that god damn OIL
Because they figured out that the cost of retrieving the empty tube, carrying/shipping it back to the factory, repairing it, reloading it, and requalifying it was greater than the cost of making a new one. The (moderately) expensive part is the rocket, not the tube.
i guess that every comment containing SWEDISH is from player who play bfbc2
KRAUSER0130 5 months ago
arent at4s a one shot deal? i guess they could mave an IED out of the tube
goodnightChesty1775 1 year ago
in vietnam they would take the spent LAW tubes and drop a hand grenade down it and run. thus destroying the tube so it cant be used again.
158057 1 year ago
its an empty tube but it could be used as a tube for a home made rocket or be used as a big pipe bomb
viper100290 1 year ago
god damn mexican guns stores
BunnySmasher721 1 year ago
Heyyyyy, I wanted that.
zhmapper 1 year ago
"Yeah i'm done"
Tombking2 1 year ago
*sigh* Denying the enemy the use of an expended one-shot weapon. That's like denying the enemy a broken waterbottle cause he might fill it with water. Except that since it's broken, it already leaks. Morons.
MoonEyes2k 1 year ago
@MoonEyes2k yeah but they could always put tape over the holes tehe
tuffers2142 1 year ago
Now thats recycling!
ostmash 1 year ago
now buy another one from sweden ;)
coldcrits 2 years ago 27
@coldcrits Are they made here or? :P
Tombking2 1 year ago
emm lol it cost around 10million krones= 1,4m dollor to fire 1 shot
arcaion 2 years ago
@arcaion They sure ain't cheap but the price you mentioned is so wrong you wouldn't belive..
They actually cost around 1300 USD for the military.
Midhaven 2 years ago
@arcaion dude it cost 14000krones and thats 2000 USD get your facts right// swedish amphibious marines
erkko145 1 year ago
@arcaion What did you get your "facts" from COD4? lol i bet your thinking of the javelin... not AT4
L3G3NDARYK1LL3R 1 year ago
@arcaion rofl thats not even close the at4 cost $1,480 if your thinking javelin that is $143,358 for the tube. and for each missle of the javelin that is $86,014 nothing near a 1.4 mill
Lopper12 1 year ago
shoulda given it to me damn it
InnerDemons268 2 years ago
good job on destroying it, one less IED we won't have to worry about
08gnome08 2 years ago
that doesn't make any sense
gamemaster1199 2 years ago
An IED is a explosive, a non lunched bomb, mauly detomated or containing a senser, an AT4 fires a RPG or a simple rocket
gabeguy24 2 years ago
@gabeguy24 speling iz harrd
MrKyleSchick 1 year ago
@MrKyleSchick lunch bomb!
NonDairyYogurt 1 year ago
wow... yes you are indeed a hard ass
wesingforchange 2 years ago
Things an AT-4 tube can be reused as:
1. Pull the pin of several grenades, put them in the tube and make a gravity assisted booby trap by hanging it vertically.
2. DIY mortar. Simply attach a firing pin and a bottom plate.
3. IED's.
4. Fake penis.
Somehow I think the insurgents are most likely to use it for number 1-3 and not 4, so destroying it was the right thing to do.
titan5000 3 years ago 3
rofl hahaha, fake penis, those resourceful bastards
masterxpb 2 years ago
@titan5000 hooah!
aurick7737 2 years ago
Good job. I've seen these things reused as mortar tubes.
auto9898 3 years ago
ROFL 0:14-0:18 = fail
theairupthere8 3 years ago 3
that look like my tax, isn't it?
SH0TTYMAD 3 years ago
The fucking missile was already fired, the tube can't be reused. They were destroying it so some towelhead didn't come along and make an IED out of it....try to actually research something before bitching about it....
Rofocowboy84 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AT-4 have been used for IED's. That's it, im going to the UN to have sections on America for providing material support to terrorism........
blanker1977 3 years ago
Sanctions genius not sections.
roonalwazlib 3 years ago 6
Who enforces UN sanctions? Oh, that's right, the US.....
Rofocowboy84 3 years ago
the marines aint taking shyt back with fallen troops abu musab alzarqawi had a m249 that he got from a fallen soldier terrorist got m16s too im pretty sure
DARIUSX3 3 years ago
Anybody can still use that tube for IED/EFP's. Why the hell are they dumping it anyhow? They need to take it with them. That's the smart thing to do and that's what the Marines are doing.
Integrabad18c 4 years ago
The AT-4 missile tube is non-reusable. They destroy them so that insurgents can't use them for IEDs.
Chuckles01 4 years ago 2
No offense, but I'd laugh if it went BOOM !
majormayhem1 4 years ago
Yeah, because empty tubes explode all the time.
TaintedMojo 4 years ago 22
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No it would be some shit if it still had a round in their smart ass.
majormayhem1 4 years ago
majormayhem1 you are retarded, the weight difference between a loaded and alreay spent AT4 would be way different so it wouldn't be hard to tell the difference.
watcherofmovies93 3 years ago
@TaintedMojo the insurgents have tried hiding explosives in them...
fusionstar916 1 year ago
@TaintedMojo They use em to hide grenades, then when unsuspecting jow pick it up to see if its useful after sighting it in a house against the wall, 5 pinless grenades fall out. Or they just throw another rocket in it and use our own accurate weapon against us.
MisterLEM0NS 1 year ago
U sure they are non reusable? I didn't think they were.
ParasuicidalFoxtrot 4 years ago
nope...cant use them again....you can stuff em with shit to make an IED but cant put another rocket in em
xain1967 4 years ago 2
just so no one is confused this is american army missile tubes
quilmesfiesta 4 years ago
No the at-4 is swedish and leased by the US army
dalerstedt 4 years ago
Lol, Thanks....
quilmesfiesta 4 years ago
What are the launcher tubes made of? A composite or alu/steel or what?
MiniRup 4 years ago
Fiberglass.
violentquaker 3 years ago
what a waste of money, why dont they just recycle and reuse it?
SniperSam 5 years ago
Sure Sniper, they could just put it one of those green bins by the curb
caspercobb 4 years ago
Uh, I didnt ask for a retarded answer but then again, what did I expect , dumb ass, an intelligent and logical answer would be nice
SniperSam 4 years ago
HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF IRONY!
subversantmonarch 4 years ago
they spend trillions of dollars on a war y would they care about 1 tube
supaflylob 4 years ago
No... no, you're right, they shouldn't care about one tube... and they shouldn't care about all the chinooks, apaches, and blackhawks being destroyed by rebels, the on ly thing they should focus on is getting that god damn OIL
Penis
quilmesfiesta 4 years ago
LOL
SniperSam 4 years ago
Yer right supafly, they couldve sent it my way so I can rehash it and use it on my ex
SniperSam 4 years ago
Because they figured out that the cost of retrieving the empty tube, carrying/shipping it back to the factory, repairing it, reloading it, and requalifying it was greater than the cost of making a new one. The (moderately) expensive part is the rocket, not the tube.
violentquaker 3 years ago
abdulrk1, i wouldnt mind if an empty tube hit me. Most likely, the rocket would have been fired at you.
BOBC82 5 years ago
hope 1 of them hits u
Abdulrk1 5 years ago