Hello everyone and Simon! I am from Romania and I too think that it was an inside job. However, there are other aspects and footage that prove this. Looking at this video I noticed that in the first footage the chopper is reversing straight while in the second one it seems to be descending a bit. Maybe there are indeed two different footages
Wow, the Verrazano Bridge from 0:40 to 0:50 looks enormous! Not only that but it appears to be moving/drifting to the left. This footage has clearly been tampered with just before it was released back then....
i believe that 9/11 was an inside job, but an explanation was the video: if you watch the news, you would know that sometimes they use footage and images from 10 minutes earlier to show you what you missed. it may have just said live on the video because they didnt bother taking it off.
@livefreediehard28 In one frame the tower has collapsed and in the other it has not. However, the same black helicopter going in reverse appears in both images. Also, it seems to be the same footage in every respect, except for the fact that the towers havent collapsed in one of them.
The fact that this many differing opinions have come out against 9/11 is all that matters to me. I have seen many ruthless tactics deployed to purposefully mislead the pubic on both sides of the debate and believe it all to be a distraction in one form or the other. My best wishes to those who seek the truth and good luck in your lifetime. I will prepare none the less and make sure that I personally can make a difference along with the ones I have been lucky enough to call friends.
Notice on all these videos how the station logo strip at the "bottom" of the screen is unprecedentedly high on the screen, half way up in some cases, but ALL of the networks kept their logos REALLY HIGH that day. It wasn't just Faux News, they all did it. They're all owned, ultimately, by the same ass clowns.
that's fucking awful-- how could they possibly think people would believe this? Who do they think they're kidding? Did they all have a good laugh about it before they aired it? ha
Simon you are one clever, smart, observant, talented, critical thinker. Airliners DID NOT hit the towers, aluminum cannot slice through concrete and steel. JASSM missiles were used.
why isnt this video getting any responses from people who dont think this was an inside job. If you look at other 9/11 vids there are a lot of people who believe that this wasnt an inside job but none of them seems to comment to your videos.
@RaidenX2007 Because most reasonable people have stopped commenting on youtube. Some people also might actually understand that a TV helicopter in an interesting filming position circles back and forth all the time. What else would they have filmed that day?
I'm no mathematician, but I can guess the odds would be well beyond possibility! Great video, Simon! It was Sept. Clues that clued me in that the major networks were complicit in 911! Now, I've had many ostriches tell me that this would involve thousands, and since 2 people can't keep a secret...but, consider this: if you, as a TV stn. mngr. (let's say) are given some videos and told to play them by some scary g-men, what would you do? When what is REALLY going on sinks in, what then?
wow youre retarded , what hes trying to say is that the chopper appears in both videos , alongs with the direction and the actual video.. BUT , in Russia it collapsed while in the USA news it was still standing .. common sense would help
If you look at the video, the chopper on the left is not descending or ascending, and if you look at the chopper on the right, it's descending. The video is 11 minutes apart, why is not possible for the chopper to be there for 11 minutes filming? Yes, common sense would help. Why don't you use it?
Furthermore, this guy believes there were no actual airplanes that flew into the towers. While there were thousands of people in NYC who saw it for themselves. If you're going to believe 9/11 was an inside job, at least be just a little "realistic" about it.
Haha... its not funny people die for some one put more money in his pocket
Simon u rely have sharp eyes dude ..like Ace.B (that is funny):P
Just pause the Video at 02:04 and calculate the smoke path in the sky they are corecty match its other with seems the tower are still up
3d tv layer topography 1 is the surrounding buildings empire states bridge behind etc.. other layer is the Smokes rumbles etc.. and the last one is the towers they could saw to u even launching them in space &u believe
at 50 seconds the backround bridge,some 7.5 miles away is directly behind and looming in relation to wtc. this is impossible. then it is missing. this is impossible.
Hi, you probably already figured it out, but at 50 sec, that is two lower buildings in the clip. Stop it right at 42 secs and you can see the edge of the standing building there.
simply brilliant simon, you have done it again, i notice how very few debunkers are commenting on this, i guess they are wise to shut up than make some silly debunking remark and make a fool of themselves!again great job, and keep up the great work!!!
simonshack truly has some of the stupidest videos on youtube. The helicopter was not reversing. They were hovering near each other to film the event. The chopper filming drifted aft putting the "black" helicopter in its way. Just before it appeared to reverse the camera tilted. That was because the filming chopper began moving forward making the other appear to move aft. They were in that location a long time filming
srstacy, are you smoking crack or what? SimonShack has some kick ass videos. I am huge fan. Keep dropping information bombs on these dumbed down veiwers simonshack! Your fans are out here.
Some of the smoke is the same also in the last two comparisons. There is a spot that looks like a zero-0 and next to it two slashes-//. In the photo on the left it is clear next to the buildings, then on the right, the zero spot is twirling down to the exact same placement and the slashes become apparent right before the video stops.
NES or N64 (Nintendo)? Will check them out.Thanks. That's just the kind of feedback I'm looking for.If experts in each field of this research lent their knowledge in the right direction we'd make tons of progress every day.
Yea, Nintendo Entertainment System and the Nintendo 64. It really looks exactly like something from one of those. Considering it was in 2001, why not?
ShillSheep Joined: March 13, 2008 Last Login: 4 minutes ago Videos Watched: 38 Subscribers: 0 Channel Views: 117 Age: 39 Military Hometown: Detroit Country: United States Occupation: United States Army Field Artillery Automated Tactical Data Systems Specialist Interests and Hobbies: Baseball and hockey A one star murdering terrorist giving your video one star! Figures.
It's very crude, and fools us only when we buy the gestalt of what we are seeing. In other words, these forgeries rely on our not scrutinizing their detail. Once you start to look at the details, though, they all fall apart. Someday the whole thing will look as fake as War of the Worlds seems to us now.
also consider, the more far away chopper seems to have a "wescam" like installation. If that is true (cant tell of the bad Quality) imagine you hovering 11 min. at the same spot sideways to the object of interest, very unlike! And paparazos driving Princes Diana to death, but when the WTC is burning they behave and stay miles away uhhhh yeah sure. i c natural human instincts blocked, who gave orders to chopper pilots? i realy would like to know
thatsshit sez: "...who gave orders to chopper pilots? i realy would like to know"
Mmmmm...yeah. Seems like just about everything else about the 911 "snuff films" (thank you Scotty) has been picked apart pretty well by now.
But not that little detail yet.
And it will surely fall in with "Who had the power to order off the security?", always a classic clue in any NWO goon-perpetrated violence, "terror attack", assassination, etc.
you should check out choppers flying backwards. do they not have raise their front nose to go backwards? this video being shown played backwards i think.
interesting. actually someone earlier made a valid point about the design of the chopper. It seems quite distinct. Is this a usual design ? is it identifiable?
socialservice - the master of eagle eyes for fakery. brilliant mash ;
my 'genre nitpicker' says this is a top smoking gun for 9/11 "video' fakery, not tv fakery [livefeed], but both goes logically hand in hand..great job!!!
The United State as a collective consciousness has not yet reached an awareness that something is not right. Because everyone is so frightened of giving up the system in the United States we are going to be forced to give it up.
The system is corrupt, it does not work, it does not honor life and it does not honor earth. Consciousness will inevitably change because it is part of the divine plain.
It's the same chopper, there is an unusual white painted section on both. In fact, it looks like the fishy perp object seen in other videos. Who does that paintwork belong to? Anyone?
I imagine the whole thing was being carefully co-ordinated, so for the above "camera" to zoom out, the chopper could have been ordered to move back out of shot! It's a simple manouevre, no traffic and it's easy if you are already hovering! Saying that, I'm not at all convinced that it isn't computer generated. Very little of the footage looks real to me, even the powder fountain collapses.
Great find, Simon! As most wide TV shots are turning out to be fakes, wouldn't it be worth comparing the smoke coming out of the WTC on those fake shots to the smoke visible in close-up shots that we deem to be (more likely to be) genuine? Surely, they can't have made the smoke match convincingly?!?
Hello everyone and Simon! I am from Romania and I too think that it was an inside job. However, there are other aspects and footage that prove this. Looking at this video I noticed that in the first footage the chopper is reversing straight while in the second one it seems to be descending a bit. Maybe there are indeed two different footages
zvori 1 month ago
Actually this video alone proves a hoax
Well done, Simon
80sMeavyHetal 1 month ago
Wow, the Verrazano Bridge from 0:40 to 0:50 looks enormous! Not only that but it appears to be moving/drifting to the left. This footage has clearly been tampered with just before it was released back then....
StreetLethalRacing 3 months ago
i believe that 9/11 was an inside job, but an explanation was the video: if you watch the news, you would know that sometimes they use footage and images from 10 minutes earlier to show you what you missed. it may have just said live on the video because they didnt bother taking it off.
But, your explanation may be right, who knows?
livefreediehard28 5 months ago in playlist My ADDITIONAL 9/11 RESEARCH
@livefreediehard28 In one frame the tower has collapsed and in the other it has not. However, the same black helicopter going in reverse appears in both images. Also, it seems to be the same footage in every respect, except for the fact that the towers havent collapsed in one of them.
hollyball88 5 months ago in playlist My ADDITIONAL 9/11 RESEARCH
@simonshack
No problem, thank you!
This video is very well done, by the way.
sexyshitMan 6 months ago
@simonshack
Please make this video available to iPod users!
It's the only one on your channel that can't be played because 'The author of this video does not allow playback on iPod.'
Thank you.
sexyshitMan 10 months ago
@sexyshitMan
Oops! Just noticed this comment today. Thanks, man - done!
I guess i clicked on that 'no iPod' box by mistake, when I uploaded this video...
simonshack 6 months ago
Man, WTF?? HOAX?
cry2love 11 months ago
The fact that this many differing opinions have come out against 9/11 is all that matters to me. I have seen many ruthless tactics deployed to purposefully mislead the pubic on both sides of the debate and believe it all to be a distraction in one form or the other. My best wishes to those who seek the truth and good luck in your lifetime. I will prepare none the less and make sure that I personally can make a difference along with the ones I have been lucky enough to call friends.
spearonez 1 year ago
Hi!
The decoration-cut with helicopter at 03:06 -- It seems like the helicopter
was inserted AFTER the camera-rotation was added.
I kind of see the helicopter go through the picture, wile N.Y. is rotating in the back.
... there is much wrong with the 911 pictures...
Tufa911 1 year ago
youtube.com / watch?v=8w7VbB5cAfI explain that video then you whopper
dirtedigitalrecords 1 year ago
@dirtedigitalrecords
It is a digital animation. Understand, yes?
simonshack 1 year ago 6
The Fox5 is a fabrication. The perspective is also wrong.
There is a lot wrong on the 911 videos!!
Understand, Yes?
Tufa911 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Fox5 is a fabrication. The perspective is also wrong.
There is a lot wrong on the videos!!
Understand, Yes?
Tufa911 1 year ago
good lookin out , hold your position mr.
nudracr 1 year ago
is virtuouszero paying attention? WINGED MISSILES! DRONES! Some said planes some said missiles......WINGED MISSILES
WillWilsonII 2 years ago
it was just going back and forth during that 11mins (and more probs) surely?
sussex113 2 years ago
@sussex113
No. The perspective of the N.Y city is also in error.
The helicopter is just a cool argument!
Tufa911 1 year ago
Amazing.
kiwiaurora 2 years ago 4
Notice on all these videos how the station logo strip at the "bottom" of the screen is unprecedentedly high on the screen, half way up in some cases, but ALL of the networks kept their logos REALLY HIGH that day. It wasn't just Faux News, they all did it. They're all owned, ultimately, by the same ass clowns.
piwacket33 2 years ago 4
That has been removed by leading broadcasting companies 0:22
Rezan92 2 years ago
that's fucking awful-- how could they possibly think people would believe this? Who do they think they're kidding? Did they all have a good laugh about it before they aired it? ha
saturnx311 2 years ago 4
'one' of the fucked up things is that some lawyer would represent the criminals
worldoperator 2 years ago 2
make me think of Wag the Dog. I bet they used a doritos bag before rendering it as a plane :)
BTW good job simon, you really put an effort to this.
JackassBauer1 2 years ago 4
Simon you are one clever, smart, observant, talented, critical thinker. Airliners DID NOT hit the towers, aluminum cannot slice through concrete and steel. JASSM missiles were used.
lmfecher 2 years ago 7
i knew it...
not only the planes were cartoons...
the complete scenery was fake...
timingfunk 2 years ago 6
Great job simon
One question:
why isnt this video getting any responses from people who dont think this was an inside job. If you look at other 9/11 vids there are a lot of people who believe that this wasnt an inside job but none of them seems to comment to your videos.
RaidenX2007 2 years ago
Raiden ... could it be because believers in the outrageously kooky official version of the 9/11 events prefer to comment elsewhere?
simonshack 2 years ago
yeah your vids are like so much more dangerous and hard to refute than anything else
this should be on tv
mobbaddict 2 years ago 2
it was! ;o
andastroz 2 years ago
@RaidenX2007 Because most reasonable people have stopped commenting on youtube. Some people also might actually understand that a TV helicopter in an interesting filming position circles back and forth all the time. What else would they have filmed that day?
hansbaer3 4 months ago
I'm no mathematician, but I can guess the odds would be well beyond possibility! Great video, Simon! It was Sept. Clues that clued me in that the major networks were complicit in 911! Now, I've had many ostriches tell me that this would involve thousands, and since 2 people can't keep a secret...but, consider this: if you, as a TV stn. mngr. (let's say) are given some videos and told to play them by some scary g-men, what would you do? When what is REALLY going on sinks in, what then?
Bongofury361 2 years ago
I noticed that the black helicopter is in alot of the images i've seen of 9/11
lilbill88 2 years ago
NTV uses footage that was shot 11 minutes ago. I SOLVED THE MYSTERY!! Do I win a prize?
BorderInspector 3 years ago
The building is destroyed in one video and standing in the other. Hence same footage you oaf.
agentzippo 2 years ago
You're an idiot. How is it the same footage if "building is destroyed in one video and standing in the other"?
BorderInspector 2 years ago
wow youre retarded , what hes trying to say is that the chopper appears in both videos , alongs with the direction and the actual video.. BUT , in Russia it collapsed while in the USA news it was still standing .. common sense would help
xxxnaorxxx 2 years ago
If you look at the video, the chopper on the left is not descending or ascending, and if you look at the chopper on the right, it's descending. The video is 11 minutes apart, why is not possible for the chopper to be there for 11 minutes filming? Yes, common sense would help. Why don't you use it?
BorderInspector 2 years ago
Furthermore, this guy believes there were no actual airplanes that flew into the towers. While there were thousands of people in NYC who saw it for themselves. If you're going to believe 9/11 was an inside job, at least be just a little "realistic" about it.
BorderInspector 2 years ago
thousands of people? all i saw was few people that were prolly paid for that
xxxnaorxxx 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow you're an idiot. You probably weren't even 10 when it happened. Millions of people saw the second plane hit, live and on TV.
BorderInspector 2 years ago
holy fucking shit.. maybe if you were smart youd actually WATCH his vids and realise the point
retarded fuckhead
xxxnaorxxx 2 years ago 4
LMAO forget it.. its like argueing with a wall
get a life
xxxnaorxxx 2 years ago
Haha... its not funny people die for some one put more money in his pocket
Simon u rely have sharp eyes dude ..like Ace.B (that is funny):P
Just pause the Video at 02:04 and calculate the smoke path in the sky they are corecty match its other with seems the tower are still up
3d tv layer topography 1 is the surrounding buildings empire states bridge behind etc.. other layer is the Smokes rumbles etc.. and the last one is the towers they could saw to u even launching them in space &u believe
fotistis 3 years ago
that's one hell of a math problem...
daddysevenpointfiver 3 years ago 4
Most have eyes but can not see - but Simon sure can - nice catch!
To be we couldnt bring it all to court, well lock n load!
2JOHNNYT 3 years ago 6
two sky jockeys in holding pattern hanging out together.
desertblbuesman 3 years ago
I just noticed my comment about "50 seconds". thats true too. And listening to these smarmy voice Brits; You are part of the problem.
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
at 40 sec.I have this crock of yellow shit recorded out of Clovis Ca
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
the 2nd chopper is descending while in reverse.
brgroom 3 years ago
at 50 seconds the backround bridge,some 7.5 miles away is directly behind and looming in relation to wtc. this is impossible. then it is missing. this is impossible.
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago 5
Hi, you probably already figured it out, but at 50 sec, that is two lower buildings in the clip. Stop it right at 42 secs and you can see the edge of the standing building there.
desertblbuesman 3 years ago
simply brilliant simon, you have done it again, i notice how very few debunkers are commenting on this, i guess they are wise to shut up than make some silly debunking remark and make a fool of themselves!again great job, and keep up the great work!!!
findthetruth911 3 years ago 21
Japanesexxxxxxxxx waz here and favorited and voted this one five stars! YEAH!!!
japanesexxxxxxxxx 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
simonshack truly has some of the stupidest videos on youtube. The helicopter was not reversing. They were hovering near each other to film the event. The chopper filming drifted aft putting the "black" helicopter in its way. Just before it appeared to reverse the camera tilted. That was because the filming chopper began moving forward making the other appear to move aft. They were in that location a long time filming
srstacy 3 years ago
srstacy, are you smoking crack or what? SimonShack has some kick ass videos. I am huge fan. Keep dropping information bombs on these dumbed down veiwers simonshack! Your fans are out here.
japanesexxxxxxxxx 3 years ago 6
Hellooo, 1:56, the zooming out ends, and yet, hey! Its still going back!
BahrainThunder 3 years ago 3
LOL NICE ONE BUDDY! Be safe! and keep up the great work. never stop making videos.
fasdl 3 years ago 4
They may as well be one and the same I'm sure they don't even view half the stuff they rate blind leading the blind!
911NEWSTWO 3 years ago
ShillSheep, KimmoKuopio is who I 'm talking about here the two blind mice!
911NEWSTWO 3 years ago
Simom says,"....put your hands up"
Cheers, mate, another beauty.
MandoMohan 3 years ago
Some of the smoke is the same also in the last two comparisons. There is a spot that looks like a zero-0 and next to it two slashes-//. In the photo on the left it is clear next to the buildings, then on the right, the zero spot is twirling down to the exact same placement and the slashes become apparent right before the video stops.
beastshawnee 3 years ago
The 'identification' of the chopper is a fairly moot point - unless you may identify it as some Atari/Playstation graphics...
simonshack 3 years ago
Atari/Playstation? You must be confused. That looks more like the NES or the N64.
OperationDB 3 years ago
NES or N64 (Nintendo)? Will check them out.Thanks. That's just the kind of feedback I'm looking for.If experts in each field of this research lent their knowledge in the right direction we'd make tons of progress every day.
simonshack 3 years ago
Yea, Nintendo Entertainment System and the Nintendo 64. It really looks exactly like something from one of those. Considering it was in 2001, why not?
OperationDB 3 years ago
these days I can't even discern sarcasm
:O
soletrip 3 years ago
Yes, it's amazing how few negative remarks these videos are now getting.
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago 2
Those rocky helicopter rides made me airsick!
Good job Simon!
WelcomeToKilltown 3 years ago 2
Great work, as always! Thank you, Simon!
YougeneDebs 3 years ago 2
dam youtube comments not showing up
great work SS and eyes 5*
the flying backwards helicopter is also on the bbc world at 9:49am
nanoprobe73 3 years ago 3
uH - you made me jump in my chair. Thought for a second you were talking about me (SS)....:)
simonshack 3 years ago
well done, i don't know what more proof one could need, fancy being the attorney indeed not.
wasy35 3 years ago 3
bello! Interessante!
angeloriviello 3 years ago 3
PollenB 3 years ago 4
gifted eye
soletrip 3 years ago 4
Thanks mate for sending me here..MORE EVIDENCE ..MORE PROOF..9/11 INSIDE JOB.
for you BUSH media eaters..watch a Jack-in-the-Box commercial.. and think inside the box.
1DarkWingDuck 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Have some more LSD you crazy piece of shit Nico!
gordonshumway7 3 years ago
in my opinion something hit the towers , not a comercial plane but probably a missile , that was covered by a CGI 767
dracodie 3 years ago 2
nice find
dracodie 3 years ago 2
Simon Shack, you're a legend bro. Keep it up!
ImyManz99 3 years ago 18
Someday...someday, the whole world will be acknowledging the brilliant, courageous and humanitarian work the Truthers have done in our behalf.
5*s!
nameofthepen 3 years ago 6
computer generated sceneries of Manhattan?
all the videos of that day were fake? i dont buy that. only the plane videos are fake imo.
Dynamicdj 3 years ago
Excellent work as usual, sir!!!!!!!!!
5 tilting yellow stars
apocalypsynch 3 years ago 3
It's very crude, and fools us only when we buy the gestalt of what we are seeing. In other words, these forgeries rely on our not scrutinizing their detail. Once you start to look at the details, though, they all fall apart. Someday the whole thing will look as fake as War of the Worlds seems to us now.
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago 6
not someday. YESTERday!!!
zezt 3 years ago 4
watch the "wag the dog" video about 9/11
it shows TONNES of fakery ,just like this, with the planes.
like appearing out of nowhere and fake wings.
jassi4010709 3 years ago 4
Maybe you're referring to "September Clues"? ;)
Btw, there's at least one PSYOP (Psychological Operation) manual which recommends to its trainees the '90s movie "Wag The Dog". I wanna see it.
apocalypsynch 3 years ago 3
also consider, the more far away chopper seems to have a "wescam" like installation. If that is true (cant tell of the bad Quality) imagine you hovering 11 min. at the same spot sideways to the object of interest, very unlike! And paparazos driving Princes Diana to death, but when the WTC is burning they behave and stay miles away uhhhh yeah sure. i c natural human instincts blocked, who gave orders to chopper pilots? i realy would like to know
thatsshit 3 years ago 6
thatsshit sez: "...who gave orders to chopper pilots? i realy would like to know"
Mmmmm...yeah. Seems like just about everything else about the 911 "snuff films" (thank you Scotty) has been picked apart pretty well by now.
But not that little detail yet.
And it will surely fall in with "Who had the power to order off the security?", always a classic clue in any NWO goon-perpetrated violence, "terror attack", assassination, etc.
nameofthepen 3 years ago
Oh yes. I agree...
simonshack 3 years ago
SC147: Oh god, hahaha, that was brilliant!
DABIGRAGU1 3 years ago 7
you should check out choppers flying backwards. do they not have raise their front nose to go backwards? this video being shown played backwards i think.
gangsterdrester 3 years ago 7
Today I called a helicopter school. A helicopter pilot/technician responded. Regarding reversing chopper he said :
1 : there is no sense in doing it(no visibility)
2 : reversing chopper should be tilting 'backwards'(i.e. tail down and nose up)
3 : reversing over a city in the presence of other choppers is rather foolish (his words - not mine).
4. TWO choppers doing this in an 11 minute timeframe - he said - seemed "very strange".
simonshack 3 years ago
interesting. actually someone earlier made a valid point about the design of the chopper. It seems quite distinct. Is this a usual design ? is it identifiable?
sidlittle 3 years ago 3
Good point. Anybody expert in NewYork,FDNY, Military (or what) helicopters here ?
simonshack 3 years ago
don't know but it shouldn't be hard to identify. Really does look quite distinct 1min 48 in.
Reminds me of an insect for some reason lol- perhaps not a million miles off.
sidlittle 3 years ago 3
another great found,
thank you simon!
youzurk 3 years ago 7
awesome ;
socialservice - the master of eagle eyes for fakery. brilliant mash ;
my 'genre nitpicker' says this is a top smoking gun for 9/11 "video' fakery, not tv fakery [livefeed], but both goes logically hand in hand..great job!!!
911censored 3 years ago 5
simon, another good vid!
5Stars!
watchzeitgeistmovie 3 years ago 5
The United State as a collective consciousness has not yet reached an awareness that something is not right. Because everyone is so frightened of giving up the system in the United States we are going to be forced to give it up.
The system is corrupt, it does not work, it does not honor life and it does not honor earth. Consciousness will inevitably change because it is part of the divine plain.
DimensionEye 3 years ago 7
Congratulation!!Great work!!
Morrison2373 3 years ago 4
What a load of crap (helicopter) I come back once in a while to see what's new, you (no-plane) posters just keep getting better and better.
Excellent video 5*
DABIGRAGU1 3 years ago 3
Again,again and again 5*
Keep fighting the good fight!!!!!
krokus69 3 years ago 4
Indeed! The bridge above at 0:40+ is interesting, thanks to hireality for spotting it!
PollenB 3 years ago 3
Intriguing footage- they have come a long way since the 'moon landing' LOL!!!
truthtrekker 3 years ago 4
cool.favourited. where did you get the russian footage from ?
sidlittle 3 years ago 5
I got friends in hi places u know...and a saucy blond mole in the Duma :)
simonshack 3 years ago
blonde russians... just remembered why i got online today.. and it wasn't for conspiracy research.
sidlittle 3 years ago 10
mmmm.... russian chick
saturnx311 2 years ago 3
another intriguing video. kudos. keep it up.
Brugality 3 years ago 4
It's the same chopper, there is an unusual white painted section on both. In fact, it looks like the fishy perp object seen in other videos. Who does that paintwork belong to? Anyone?
PollenB 3 years ago 2
Are you implying that what we see here are real images of a real reversing chopper of some kind?
simonshack 3 years ago
I see your point Simon, but could it be a reversed layer?
PollenB 3 years ago
Ps - Choppers can fly backwards!
PollenB 3 years ago
That's right. I just called a helicopter school: an expert pilot had these comments to do about a backward flying chopper:
1 : there is no sense in doing it(no visibility)
2 : reversing chopper should be tilting 'backwards'(i.e. tail down and nose up)
3 : reversing over a city in the presence of other choppers is rather foolish (his words-not mine).
4. TWO choppers doing this in an 11 minute timeframe - he said - seemed very strange.
simonshack 3 years ago
I imagine the whole thing was being carefully co-ordinated, so for the above "camera" to zoom out, the chopper could have been ordered to move back out of shot! It's a simple manouevre, no traffic and it's easy if you are already hovering! Saying that, I'm not at all convinced that it isn't computer generated. Very little of the footage looks real to me, even the powder fountain collapses.
PollenB 3 years ago 2
wabc7
BorderInspector 3 years ago
nice work....
madmod72 3 years ago 4
Great job Simon, how many more evidences are needed to imprison all these media liars...they want us to commit suicide but we won't. We will win!
Artifalia 3 years ago 6
well spotted HR!!
PollenB 3 years ago 3
Screw the youtube rating system....10*!
ljrow49 3 years ago 5
And the challenger lands a haymaker right on his opponents kisser. 10...9...8..
PollenB 3 years ago 3
Great find, Simon! As most wide TV shots are turning out to be fakes, wouldn't it be worth comparing the smoke coming out of the WTC on those fake shots to the smoke visible in close-up shots that we deem to be (more likely to be) genuine? Surely, they can't have made the smoke match convincingly?!?
drumcode911 3 years ago 4
I got 13050326589435 to 1 odds! Brilliant vid again! Thanks! NWO is going down!
ThoughtCrime7 3 years ago 5
Excellent job!
Anunnaki12 3 years ago 3
simple reason and logic
hunterswine 3 years ago 4