Im not suprised that hes playing it slowed down a lot, I litterally havent heard this piece at full speed by a human being, if only liszt was here to play it at the horrendous hard speeds that they were writtin and played in. I swear liszts an alien or something lol.
There are reasons why Liszt made the Transcendental Etudes, since the changes in the Piano made some of the effects he had with the older piano so different, especially the bit where the runs with the pedal to be held and he changes it to just octaves in the newer version
@scriabinish Nah, IMO he cheats by going really slow in most of the Grandes. But he probably had a deadline with his project of recording all the Liszt compositions, "so better play some of the compositions at half speed and use half as much time practicing them! :D So I can put out twice as many cd's"
@despina41 Arrau is awesome, and plays with far more vim and power, but he never played this version as far as I know. Just the Wilde Jagd version, which has considerably less music in it and is far more playable. This is bordering on impossible.
Badass performance of a Badass piece! I love it. Howard himself said that Liszt demanded the impossible in this one.
Lisz's composition is so underrated, if a little strange sometimes. The middle section from 2.10 to 3.37 is to die for... but sandwiched between what could be argued to be two areas of pure "stunt piano playing". The perfect encore?
i honestly doubt your judgement of technical difficulties. of course one can never be sure what exactly is the most difficult - that always depends on your own technical weaknesses. but most difficulties in this etude belong to the standard repertoire of a virtuoso pianist - being octaves, chords and fast runs.
i think there would not be one pianist who would doubt that "feux follets" (number 5 of the grandes etudes) is the hardest. in this case leslie howard himself says it, too.
Why does he change / simplify the syncopated rhythm at the beginning?
It's not like he was unable (he does pull it off at other similar places), but I also don't understand the rationale behind it (plus I don't like it).
It's commonly held that #5 is the hardest. However Leslie Howard said of #8 that "Liszt demands the impossible" at the beginning of this piece. In the "rumble of notes" you're supposed to pick out a clean descending scale of accented notes... Howard, though amazing, can barely do it - you can hear.
There are also other pieces of Liszt's - such as "Grande fantaisie di bravura sur La clochette de Paganini" - which are in a similar category.
I absolutely agree. This etude is played in a way which is very muddled; in most of the Douze Grandes Etudes Howard seems to be struggling at the piano.
Interesting, because I would imagine that 3 thirds are harder than 2 thirds. And I agree with you that which one is hard for somebody is easy to somebody else.
well that's true - 3 thirds are harder than two, but however to me at least the thirds weren't the major challenge. one of the harder parts to me was the new beginning with the pretty fast run that you need some complicated fingering for, since it kind of has jumps in it, too, if you understand what i mean.
Yeah I know what you mean. That part doesn't even exist in GE version of 4 etude. But for me it's just a little bit more complicated scale. You will get use to that if you play liszt's finger exercises. I think the middle part of GE version is even better than in TE version. Maybe I should play the GE version too. Even though I have played only some parts of mazeppa.
but howard refers to that being impossible on modern pianos, since liszt originally intended to have the pedal held for about 40 notes or so - and then it only IS impossible to hear the melody in the right hand. but that is only a difficulty not in technicality, nor in musicality but is simply a mechanical problem of your instrument. liszt later revised his rather strange (to modern pianos) pedaling - since later pianos in his lifetime had already trouble keeping the clear melody from blurring
I love your opinion on the Lizst Etude. I'm just curious, if you were to choose one of the Lizst etude to play for a piano competition which one would you choose and why?
This may be slower than the speed Liszt recommended, but faster does not always mean better.
forgottenbooks 1 week ago
Im not suprised that hes playing it slowed down a lot, I litterally havent heard this piece at full speed by a human being, if only liszt was here to play it at the horrendous hard speeds that they were writtin and played in. I swear liszts an alien or something lol.
TheLolMenPeople 1 month ago
I played this piece better... Then I woke up
FranzLisztFerentz 3 months ago
Piano + Liszt = Immaculate Perfection
toremindthose 3 months ago
@nazhiitoxx
No.5 is harder
KBLgames 4 months ago
@KBLgames No
DanMarcy1 2 months ago
There are reasons why Liszt made the Transcendental Etudes, since the changes in the Piano made some of the effects he had with the older piano so different, especially the bit where the runs with the pedal to be held and he changes it to just octaves in the newer version
classicalhero7 7 months ago
4:30 O.O
TheClaux97 8 months ago
You have never seen Hammelin Liszt version etudies its more more more dificult than Liszt
chopinpianist1991 9 months ago
@chopinpianist1991 Hamelin's set of etudes are inspired by different composers. Hamelin's La Campanella is just one from the set.
NathanPhungMusic 7 months ago
Of all the Grand etudes, I feel this is the one that's most expressive. And the fact that it's 8 minutes makes it all the more better.
liszt141 10 months ago
I have a feeling that Howard is not the best person to be playing these...
scriabinish 10 months ago 4
@scriabinish Nah, IMO he cheats by going really slow in most of the Grandes. But he probably had a deadline with his project of recording all the Liszt compositions, "so better play some of the compositions at half speed and use half as much time practicing them! :D So I can put out twice as many cd's"
SanctumZero 9 months ago
Maybe such a sensational piece should be played as cautiously as this
FfSpgfLerWhd 1 year ago
That's not the original score. I don't kwow this version. hm ??? Could it be that is a version by Cziffra?
orgelfan 1 year ago
That's not the original score. I don't kwow this version. hm ???
orgelfan 1 year ago
howard seems to be struggling at the piano on this one. All things considered... not a surprise
vokuheila 1 year ago
maronnasanta..
aosjimzaw 1 year ago
hardest are chasse neige and feu follet
v4liumfrance 1 year ago
@v4liumfrance I find mazeppa and n°10 harder than chasse neige.. :)
lottoformulier 1 year ago
@v4liumfrance This isnt a transcendental etude dude....He is talking about 12 Grandes etudes
BlazeKenny 1 year ago
Ma minchia!
MetalNicola 1 year ago
@MetalNicola Già! Sono molto più difficili degli studi trascendentali!
massimiliano123123 1 year ago
@MetalNicola Tra l'altro è molto più lungo del "Wilde Jagd" (Studio Trascendentale n 8)
massimiliano123123 1 year ago
Liszt's études sound so ... ugly and bland to me.
712Stephen 1 year ago
@712Stephen, probably bc this is a rather uninspired performance. Check out Arrau. He plays it in 5 minutes - definitely strepitoso!
despina41 1 year ago
@despina41 Arrau is awesome, and plays with far more vim and power, but he never played this version as far as I know. Just the Wilde Jagd version, which has considerably less music in it and is far more playable. This is bordering on impossible.
IDTFG 1 year ago
I love the 2 notes at 0:48, after those rapid chromatic runs, as if Liszt is just joking and being a dick. Great stuff, great playing =)
bugsfan 1 year ago 2
This is just ridiculous. Picking out the melody from the scales first and then the arpeggios later... cruelty!
Haeronthegreat 1 year ago
Badass performance of a Badass piece! I love it. Howard himself said that Liszt demanded the impossible in this one.
Lisz's composition is so underrated, if a little strange sometimes. The middle section from 2.10 to 3.37 is to die for... but sandwiched between what could be argued to be two areas of pure "stunt piano playing". The perfect encore?
AlexAlcyone 1 year ago
so much harder than the 1852 ones hahaha but amazing
MasterAzunai 1 year ago
The intro is such bullshit
FranzLisztian 2 years ago 3
DUDE, what the hell?! this makes the newer version look like a walk through the park on a sunny day......
chutdigadut 2 years ago 13
Who's harder? Listz or Alkan?
Jim341046 2 years ago
@Jim341046 Alkan
ultracoolhomies 2 years ago
@Jim341046 probably Alkan, but I find Liszt has more music than just difficulty. Of course thats just my own opinion.
SlyStallone208 2 years ago
All of Alkan's works demanded virtuosity but not all of Liszt's, he kinda made an exception with the 12 etudes, though.
richclayderman 2 years ago
@Jim341046 Liszt!! by far!! Escpecially with the Grande Etudes!!
robfuturemd 2 years ago
oh dear....thats really liszt....he putt all kinde of dramatic in it....but in one way...its really trandentental!!
scriabin007 2 years ago
Liszt nicknamed this piece "Wilde Jagd."
Starbirdy9999 2 years ago
No he didn't.
FranzLisztian 2 years ago 4
Well, at least in the Trancendental version.
Starbirdy9999 2 years ago
That however, is correct.
FranzLisztian 2 years ago 6
Oh. I thought were named that.
Starbirdy9999 2 years ago
Bravo, great, great interpretation by Leslie Howard. The twelve Liszt's etudes must be a real head ache for any musician but they are stunning.
Ray0X0 2 years ago
i honestly doubt your judgement of technical difficulties. of course one can never be sure what exactly is the most difficult - that always depends on your own technical weaknesses. but most difficulties in this etude belong to the standard repertoire of a virtuoso pianist - being octaves, chords and fast runs.
i think there would not be one pianist who would doubt that "feux follets" (number 5 of the grandes etudes) is the hardest. in this case leslie howard himself says it, too.
jackewiebohne 2 years ago
Sorry, your response makes no sense at all.
The syncopated passages I'm talking about are the same in both versions, and he plays them right here in a simplified way.
twooffour 2 years ago 2
My god, now THAT'S pianism. I don't even care about the difficulty anymore, that's a hell of a well written piece!!!!
AcePro 2 years ago
Why does he change / simplify the syncopated rhythm at the beginning?
It's not like he was unable (he does pull it off at other similar places), but I also don't understand the rationale behind it (plus I don't like it).
Anyone with an answer?
twooffour 2 years ago
hmm that would hurt thee fingers lol awesome piece
freaky666freak 2 years ago
Wow,It's....too powerful!!!
hyperkeyboard91 3 years ago 2
It's commonly held that #5 is the hardest. However Leslie Howard said of #8 that "Liszt demands the impossible" at the beginning of this piece. In the "rumble of notes" you're supposed to pick out a clean descending scale of accented notes... Howard, though amazing, can barely do it - you can hear.
There are also other pieces of Liszt's - such as "Grande fantaisie di bravura sur La clochette de Paganini" - which are in a similar category.
AlexPxr8 3 years ago 4
I absolutely agree. This etude is played in a way which is very muddled; in most of the Douze Grandes Etudes Howard seems to be struggling at the piano.
kusuna7 3 years ago
i think 4 is the most diffucult
AminelikesStephanie 3 years ago
number 4 is actually easier in this version than in the third version known as "transcendental etudes". at least it was to me as i played both.
jackewiebohne 2 years ago
Interesting, because I would imagine that 3 thirds are harder than 2 thirds. And I agree with you that which one is hard for somebody is easy to somebody else.
Aul1kki 2 years ago
well that's true - 3 thirds are harder than two, but however to me at least the thirds weren't the major challenge. one of the harder parts to me was the new beginning with the pretty fast run that you need some complicated fingering for, since it kind of has jumps in it, too, if you understand what i mean.
jackewiebohne 2 years ago
Yeah I know what you mean. That part doesn't even exist in GE version of 4 etude. But for me it's just a little bit more complicated scale. You will get use to that if you play liszt's finger exercises. I think the middle part of GE version is even better than in TE version. Maybe I should play the GE version too. Even though I have played only some parts of mazeppa.
Aul1kki 2 years ago
Did you play the GE version in right tempo then?, because it´s a bitch then :D Large jumps etc
addeex1 2 years ago
but howard refers to that being impossible on modern pianos, since liszt originally intended to have the pedal held for about 40 notes or so - and then it only IS impossible to hear the melody in the right hand. but that is only a difficulty not in technicality, nor in musicality but is simply a mechanical problem of your instrument. liszt later revised his rather strange (to modern pianos) pedaling - since later pianos in his lifetime had already trouble keeping the clear melody from blurring
jackewiebohne 2 years ago
He didn't only change the pedalling, though :)
twooffour 2 years ago
Haha yeah.
I looked into the sheets of this piece of music and when I saw those "rumble of notes" I didn't know what to think, it looks impossible.
I would do anything to be able to play like Liszt.
Gutelimpa 2 years ago 3
May Liszt be with you always.
samyooljackson 3 years ago
this really sounds a lot different than the transcendental no.8
treskro3 3 years ago
minchia raga se è difficile!..xò lo porto al diploma!
thelittleliszt 3 years ago
This etude is rather difficult, but Grand etude #4 (and earlier version of Mazeppa) is absolutely unplayable.
hda10 3 years ago
Hello hda10,
I love your opinion on the Lizst Etude. I'm just curious, if you were to choose one of the Lizst etude to play for a piano competition which one would you choose and why?
Thank you!
MissPianist 3 years ago
Not unplayable, I can play it? :D
addeex1 2 years ago