If they broke laws then press charges you retard! Oh wait, you can't, because they didn't! FAIL! hahahahahah I think you should go back and try that again!
Wow, Douche Bag, esq. Thinks that he can cause civil disorder because he broke the law and got cited for it lmfao! Again, I would have arrested both of these idiots much sooner. If you don't like the way our government works then leave. You are a worthless waste of space!
Let me explain my cause for you. I am against your tyranny, your endless taxation, you roving road pirates pulling us over and looting us dry for every cent you can get, your individual heath care mandate, your insane drug war against some drugs and not others, your endless restrictions on every right listed in the bill of rights, and your outright thuggery. You have so many rules now you can't even say how many there are. The people are waking up, and we have had enough of your evil.
12 man juries are a common law right for all civil and criminal trials. A statute cannot overrule the constitutional acceptance-integration of common law. Its a criminal act to use a six man jury. You have no clue, are brainwashed, are obviously getting your ass kicked in this debate just like you did at the courthouse, and must retreat now in humiliation. Does your jurisdiction extend outside the courthouse, Mr. Thug? I might file charges against you thugs tomorrow...
You should really do a little more reading about the 2nd Amendment and the constitution. You also might want to read a little more about the number of jurors required in a misdemeanor trial in Florida. You are so obviously clueless as to what the constitution guarantees and you are simply a "rebel without a cause... or a clue!" And no, I am not a bailiff. This will conclude my participation in this pointless conversation.
I think it is also important to understand the reason these uniformed thugs are here debating me. IF I had broken one of their millions upon millions of ridiculous rules one supposedly needs a "License" to understand, they clearly would have been elated to beat me up imprison me. They are on YT trying to counter this video because they know they are wrong and want to spin the PR damage. The courts of injustice are a house of cards. Every time I gain experience with them, I see more ways to win.
The reality is the American revolutionaries would hang all of you as traitors and oppressors. You are betraying every principle they fought for, and if you believe that court system is just while imprisoning more non-violent people than all the rest of the world, you are simply a moron. But, its quite obvious that the state intentionally uses their psychological screening process to select bullies, morons, authoritarians, and control freaks. ;)
Are you one of those uniformed thugs that assaulted me on public property outside the court for speech, even bull-rushing me when I explained that I felt threatened by your surrounding me with loaded guns. Were you even within your jurisdiction outside the courthouse? I am still considering pressing assault and battery charged on you all. :)
I was not trying to communicate with the man on trial for possession of a firearm, despite the 2nd amendment protection of this fundamental right and despite that the denial for the right to self-defense is the denial of the right to live and in effect is a death sentence for the man potentially. He is of no consequence to me, though if my disgust at the unlawful trial, i.e., 6 jurors instead of 12 and tons of other criminal acts, helped acquit the man, I would be extremely proud.
Also, you know you were trying to communicate the the man on trial. There's no question about it. Your goal that day was to create a scene. You were asked to stop and then ultimately you had to leave because you were disturbing the court and interfering with the defendant's right to a trial.
Is making a disturbance in court the biggest thing that you have ever done? Have you ever actuallly accomplished anything? Do you have any formal education or do you just get these ridiculous ideas from websites? And before you jump to conclusions, the defendant in that case was actually an inmate at the jail which is why communicating with him is such a problem. You know nothing about him or the trial. You were there for about 3 minutes before you started booing and were asked to leave
You are a liar asserting there was communication to the defendant (inmate is so obviously prejudicial). The people are sovereign in the court, and not subject to your arbitrary judgment of every proper noise or movement. Further, you are obviously a typical authoritarian scumbag asserting that anyone who doesn't like your millions upon millions of indecipherable, unjust rules that DARES to come to court to fight for their rights had better leave, or else. You are only bullies in ugly uniforms.
I was there. Hmmm, where to begin? Was it the communication with the inmate defendant or was it the boo-ing during the prosecutor's closing argument? If you hate America (and the greatest court system in the world) so much, be my guest and get the hell out of here.
... It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus."
If you defend your rights, the control freaks will hate you. Just part of being a belligerent claimant, which is the only way to be if you want to fight for your rights.
"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor...
@146hermanator - Your a fucking liar the judge did NOT order us out of the court room it was that woman cop and we were not disrupting anything in your illegal star chamber that you DARE call a courtroom.
Also, the 'court' doesn't belong to that bully moron in a uniform or the 'judge' with the huge fancy marble sign saying so outside. It belongs to the people. In the court, the people are sovereign, the highest authority. You tyrants don't like the people making any noises or body language you don't approve of in your hall of injustices, of course. But the more you try to stop it, the more resistance will spread. The American people have had about enough of your looting and oppression.
Music to my ears. Look how easy it is to disrupt their evil dog and pony show!!
"These guys were interrupting another individual's criminal trial. What is unjust about ensuring a fair and uninterupted trial for a person accused of a crime?"
These guys were completely disruptive in court. It was not just non-verbal. They are a bunch of liars with nothing to do but waste other people's time (as if that isn't completely obvious from their pathetic tirade). These guys were interrupting another individual's criminal trial. What is unjust about ensuring a fair and uninterupted trial for a person accused of a crime? Egocentric and Ignorent - the only two words to describe these fools!
The very last thing Big Brother the moron wants is me in their "court". If I had broken even one of the millions/billions of their unjust laws, I'd have been beaten up and imprisoned. I walked away untouched. Don't be jealous because you don't have the balls to stand for liberty or need a fancy costume to feel important in life. ;)
you sound like a fag........you need to respect authority..... The judge ordered you out because of your jestures...... you need to get a life and be respectful of the law you idiots. " I will sue and file an assault charge"....are you kidding me? You moron. Keep out of Sarasota you loser.
@146hermanator - Where you there? Did you see the judge order us out of the courtroom? Was the judge male or female? If you know so much answer these questions.
If they broke laws then press charges you retard! Oh wait, you can't, because they didn't! FAIL! hahahahahah I think you should go back and try that again!
Bigfishmako 1 year ago
I wasn't cited for anything, since I broke none of the billions of nonsense rules. The cops broke the law in numerous ways though.
And neither you, your fellow scumbag tyrants, or your armies will get me out of my home.
SovereignChris 1 year ago
Wow, Douche Bag, esq. Thinks that he can cause civil disorder because he broke the law and got cited for it lmfao! Again, I would have arrested both of these idiots much sooner. If you don't like the way our government works then leave. You are a worthless waste of space!
Bigfishmako 1 year ago
Let me explain my cause for you. I am against your tyranny, your endless taxation, you roving road pirates pulling us over and looting us dry for every cent you can get, your individual heath care mandate, your insane drug war against some drugs and not others, your endless restrictions on every right listed in the bill of rights, and your outright thuggery. You have so many rules now you can't even say how many there are. The people are waking up, and we have had enough of your evil.
SovereignChris 1 year ago
12 man juries are a common law right for all civil and criminal trials. A statute cannot overrule the constitutional acceptance-integration of common law. Its a criminal act to use a six man jury. You have no clue, are brainwashed, are obviously getting your ass kicked in this debate just like you did at the courthouse, and must retreat now in humiliation. Does your jurisdiction extend outside the courthouse, Mr. Thug? I might file charges against you thugs tomorrow...
SovereignChris 1 year ago
You should really do a little more reading about the 2nd Amendment and the constitution. You also might want to read a little more about the number of jurors required in a misdemeanor trial in Florida. You are so obviously clueless as to what the constitution guarantees and you are simply a "rebel without a cause... or a clue!" And no, I am not a bailiff. This will conclude my participation in this pointless conversation.
freedealer1 1 year ago
I think it is also important to understand the reason these uniformed thugs are here debating me. IF I had broken one of their millions upon millions of ridiculous rules one supposedly needs a "License" to understand, they clearly would have been elated to beat me up imprison me. They are on YT trying to counter this video because they know they are wrong and want to spin the PR damage. The courts of injustice are a house of cards. Every time I gain experience with them, I see more ways to win.
SovereignChris 1 year ago
The reality is the American revolutionaries would hang all of you as traitors and oppressors. You are betraying every principle they fought for, and if you believe that court system is just while imprisoning more non-violent people than all the rest of the world, you are simply a moron. But, its quite obvious that the state intentionally uses their psychological screening process to select bullies, morons, authoritarians, and control freaks. ;)
SovereignChris 1 year ago
Are you one of those uniformed thugs that assaulted me on public property outside the court for speech, even bull-rushing me when I explained that I felt threatened by your surrounding me with loaded guns. Were you even within your jurisdiction outside the courthouse? I am still considering pressing assault and battery charged on you all. :)
SovereignChris 1 year ago
I was not trying to communicate with the man on trial for possession of a firearm, despite the 2nd amendment protection of this fundamental right and despite that the denial for the right to self-defense is the denial of the right to live and in effect is a death sentence for the man potentially. He is of no consequence to me, though if my disgust at the unlawful trial, i.e., 6 jurors instead of 12 and tons of other criminal acts, helped acquit the man, I would be extremely proud.
SovereignChris 1 year ago
Also, you know you were trying to communicate the the man on trial. There's no question about it. Your goal that day was to create a scene. You were asked to stop and then ultimately you had to leave because you were disturbing the court and interfering with the defendant's right to a trial.
freedealer1 1 year ago
Is making a disturbance in court the biggest thing that you have ever done? Have you ever actuallly accomplished anything? Do you have any formal education or do you just get these ridiculous ideas from websites? And before you jump to conclusions, the defendant in that case was actually an inmate at the jail which is why communicating with him is such a problem. You know nothing about him or the trial. You were there for about 3 minutes before you started booing and were asked to leave
freedealer1 1 year ago
You are a liar asserting there was communication to the defendant (inmate is so obviously prejudicial). The people are sovereign in the court, and not subject to your arbitrary judgment of every proper noise or movement. Further, you are obviously a typical authoritarian scumbag asserting that anyone who doesn't like your millions upon millions of indecipherable, unjust rules that DARES to come to court to fight for their rights had better leave, or else. You are only bullies in ugly uniforms.
SovereignChris 1 year ago
I was there. Hmmm, where to begin? Was it the communication with the inmate defendant or was it the boo-ing during the prosecutor's closing argument? If you hate America (and the greatest court system in the world) so much, be my guest and get the hell out of here.
freedealer1 1 year ago
... It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus."
--US v Johnson, (1947).
SovereignChris 1 year ago
If you defend your rights, the control freaks will hate you. Just part of being a belligerent claimant, which is the only way to be if you want to fight for your rights.
"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor...
SovereignChris 1 year ago
Yes i was there and it was a female judge you idiot.
146hermanator 1 year ago
@146hermanator - Your a fucking liar the judge did NOT order us out of the court room it was that woman cop and we were not disrupting anything in your illegal star chamber that you DARE call a courtroom.
evryonesacritic 1 year ago 3
Also, the 'court' doesn't belong to that bully moron in a uniform or the 'judge' with the huge fancy marble sign saying so outside. It belongs to the people. In the court, the people are sovereign, the highest authority. You tyrants don't like the people making any noises or body language you don't approve of in your hall of injustices, of course. But the more you try to stop it, the more resistance will spread. The American people have had about enough of your looting and oppression.
SovereignChris 1 year ago 3
'These guys were completely disruptive in court."
Music to my ears. Look how easy it is to disrupt their evil dog and pony show!!
"These guys were interrupting another individual's criminal trial. What is unjust about ensuring a fair and uninterupted trial for a person accused of a crime?"
LMAO at "fair trial."
SovereignChris 1 year ago
These guys were completely disruptive in court. It was not just non-verbal. They are a bunch of liars with nothing to do but waste other people's time (as if that isn't completely obvious from their pathetic tirade). These guys were interrupting another individual's criminal trial. What is unjust about ensuring a fair and uninterupted trial for a person accused of a crime? Egocentric and Ignorent - the only two words to describe these fools!
freedealer1 1 year ago
@freedealer1 Where you there? Tell us more about this trial that was supposedly interrupted by these two guys.
evryonesacritic 1 year ago 2
@freedealer1 - Liar
evryonesacritic 1 year ago
The very last thing Big Brother the moron wants is me in their "court". If I had broken even one of the millions/billions of their unjust laws, I'd have been beaten up and imprisoned. I walked away untouched. Don't be jealous because you don't have the balls to stand for liberty or need a fancy costume to feel important in life. ;)
SovereignChris 1 year ago 2
You only have rights if you follow the the law, if not you go to jail and pay the price. You truley are idiots!
146hermanator 1 year ago
you sound like a fag........you need to respect authority..... The judge ordered you out because of your jestures...... you need to get a life and be respectful of the law you idiots. " I will sue and file an assault charge"....are you kidding me? You moron. Keep out of Sarasota you loser.
146hermanator 1 year ago
@146hermanator - Where you there? Did you see the judge order us out of the courtroom? Was the judge male or female? If you know so much answer these questions.
evryonesacritic 1 year ago 2
Naziism - You have no rights - Slaves don't have rights - got that?
evryonesacritic 1 year ago
Comment removed
canubelieve 1 year ago
WOW! Freedom?
I hope the Liberals wakeup before their is no America for us to enjoy!
ebomey 1 year ago