Examine the Debate: Ark Impossible, Part 1

[gregrutz]

Which one of Noah's pure noble family members had crabs, herpes, syphilis and Chlamydia since most human diseases including STDs can't survive outside the human body?

[iwanttocrashmybike]

@gregrutz Biochemical hormones mutate cells;-)

Intentionality morphs biology/

[kennyyy921]

STUPID! HAHAH! IT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

[MaddPuppet]

Maybe Noah took DNA samples and thats how he fit them all on the boat

[ThatOneQuestion]

@MaddPuppet Very poor and laughable answer, but feel free to address the rest of the points rather than simply ignoring them and half-assing your way out of one part with that silly joke of yours.

There are so many things wrong with your proposed answer it will make anyone facepalm themselves until they bled. Try again, but this time-THINK about your response.

[troybrownrigg]

Pole shift. explains the ark floating!

[ThatOneQuestion]

@troybrownrigg No it doesn't ><

[troybrownrigg]

@ThatOneQuestion You didn't watch the Movie! I saw the tidel waves come over the Hymilayans and float the arks. Wiped out a couple of monks along the way!

[BanjoKiD2K]

Good Video, this Story for me makes me not beleave the Bible.

1. 600 year old man? yeah!

2. Video at 5:30 A-F Hard to Beleave

3. How can 3 groups (male/female) of White Humans account for Asian, Arab/Indian and Black people?

4. Homosexuality is a Sin. right, But for Noah and his 3 sons to populate the World would involve incest right.

Whats worse, having sex with a same sex stranger you love or having sex with someone in your family.

[BanjoKiD2K]

@BanjoKiD2K

Some Extreame Christains say Evolution is impossilbe in fact Gorilla199 says its "Evolution is as real as the mighty morphing power rangers and pokemon"

Yet this seemingly impossible fairy tale is not only more plausible its fact!

If the bible said the world was flat, they would all think thats a FACT! Too!

[VideoAudioDisco09]

@BanjoKiD2K

Don't laugh there are flat earthers, I have seen a cracker explination of why the earth is flat.... no shit.

[BanjoKiD2K]

@VideoAudioDisco09

What explanation is that?

If the Bible said the Moon is made of Cheese then to Christains thats what it is and any proof that proves otherwise is just faked by Satans Scientist.

Some Christians i have spoke to say we have never been to the Moon, we have not sent out Satilites to view other plannets etc because the Bible clearly says that Man can not get into space or something. Like no man has been to Heaven.

So they can only go to heaven at Judgement day.

[lacrymologyst]

@ir0nman197268 hey ironman... what's the difference between jesus and a picture of jesus?

it only takes one nail to hang a picture of jesus.

[lacrymologyst]

@bibleboy27 ahhh, you're such a douche! you attempted to agree with yourself and got busted. ha ha ha! how's that "trollen trollen trollen" working out for you? not so good? aww, poor baby.

you may want to take your amateur youtube skills and your bogus religious beliefs elsewhere. stop trying to battle with people smarter and more mature than yourself.

[ironmanI97268]

@lacrymologyst Oh yahh, you're the douche dungboy, he didn't know it at first you big ole cockspit!! Yeah that's right, I can spout words like that being a christian believe it or not, Ephesians 5:11 backs me on that one!!!

[ThatOneQuestion]

@ironmanI97268 "Ephesians 5:11 backs me on that one!!! "

.

Wow... using the bible to justify returning hate. I guess you didn't hear Jesus when he talked about turning the other cheek, did ya? Stupid son of a bitch. Its "Christians" like you that ruin it for the rest of the people who actually care about their religion instead of using it as an excuse, like you do.

[lacrymologyst]

@ThatOneQuestion you hit the nail on the head, there. idiots like him think having god on their side gives them a free pass to be a flaming asshole. so hypocritical of what they supposedly believe in.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@lacrymologyst No joke! Its sad to see angry little fucks like that running around pretending they can do and say whatever they want because they found a verse in their book somewhere, completely out of context with everything.

.

Its like they are completely unaware of what their religion is all about. I dont have to believe in the bullshit magic of it all to appreciate what it can do to bolster human kindness, especially with the whole "turn the other cheek".

[lacrymologyst]

@ironmanI97268 freak! the only thing i've heard come out of your mouth so far is cockspit. keep quoting that fictional book you call the bible, you idiot. you fail at life.

looks to me like he knew it as soon as he replied back to you. that's how all you extreme christians are.. you're like glass. everyone sees right through your phony bullshit. is that the best you can do? pathetic!!!

[ThatOneQuestion]

@bibleboy27 Go to my video, second video response to this channel. The second link in the description is a link I put for the response to Brown from the Answers in Creation web site. I'll paste the FIRST problem they had with Mister Brown's idea:

.

"1. Brown's model requires that no mountains be on the preflood earth, forcing the Bible to be wrong."

[ThatOneQuestion]

@bibleboy27 Thanks for the video link, though-further evidence Brown just pulls shit from his ass. But as this account is a sock account of ironman, you are blocked as well.

[ironman197268]

You blow it at 1:50, there was no Mt Everest before the flood, and nothing about it can be proved, but fossils of fish and giant clams way up that mountain is some pretty good evidence

[ThatOneQuestion]

@ironman197268 "there was no Mt Everest before the flood"

.

Seeing as how this whole video series is about how the flood is impossible, looks like you are the one who fucked up here.

.

Answers in Genesis have already refuted Walt Brown's idea on a flat earth, so I suggest you ask your Theist friends to explain why you are wrong about that.

.

Yes, fossils are on the mountain, but guess what, dumbfuck, why are there only ancient marine fossils and not elephant or penguin fossils? Dipshit.

[ironman197268]

@ThatOneQuestion Because there weren't any elephants or penguins around there at that time idiot!! The weight of the flood waters pushed that mountain up bringing with it all that ancient marine life. Walt Brown never claims a flat Earth but an Earth with minor mountains up to about 9000' tall. fucked up, dumbfuck, Dipshit... all your great words of insecurity, but you can keep on calling, I've been called it all!!

[ThatOneQuestion]

@ironman197268 "Because there weren't any elephants or penguins around there at that time idiot!! "

.

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!! Wow. Thats awesome. You are so fucking stupid.

.

"Walt Brown never claims a flat Earth"

.

You fucking moron-he most certainly did. Lie like that again and your dumbass will be blocked.

[ironman197268]

@ThatOneQuestion I know the flood happened because I helped Noah build the ark and I was in it!! You little baby, if you can't fight the battle, then don't post stupid videos like this and open comments you weak ass little chicken shit!! And Walt Brown most certainly did not claim a flat Earth there is a video of him that says so squirt!! You go ahead and block me, you wont be the first, and you wont be the last. When kids like you block me, all that means is I win and you're still a loser!!

[ThatOneQuestion]

@ironman197268 Yup, I will block liars like you because I have no time to waste on your idiotic bullshit.

.

Cant fight the battle? Funny-seems you cant even agree with other Christians with your opinions, much less with what the facts hold.

.

Yes, you "won" because someone didn't want to put up with your lies. Yeah-totally... what a sound victory. Silly child.

[MW2Addiction]

@ironman197268 Not only is that so called evidence so absurdly ignorant in so many logical ways, but you also have to be a complete idiot to believe that's good evidence for a flood. If you knew anything about plate tectonics you would know that mountain ranges are formed by uplifting tectonic plates moving underneath other plates. Some mountain tops were once at the bottom of the sea.

Wtf are teachers teaching in school now a days? This is common sense...

[grfield1]

Those who believe in the Biblical account also understand that there was much geologic activity at the time. Everest was not necessarily over 30K feet at the time. Same for other mountains. Many were created during the catastrophy

[ThatOneQuestion]

@grfield1 Prove it. Dont just assert something because your magic book said so, PROVE it. There is a great deal of science that invalidates what you are trying to pretend is reality, so you are going to have to use more than blind faith in order to impress anyone.

.

Dont lie through your teeth because your preacher told you to, it makes you look like an idiot.

[georgetcr]

The computer simulated voices make this story sound even funnier.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

What I don't understand is that being an atheist, you'd think that you would, I don't know, understand the phrase "metaphor" better. Many of the stories in the bible never actually happened, but they're put in there to teach a particular lesson. You should try going to church more often, since you're so interested in Christianity. You might learn something, and who knows. You may actually enjoy yourself.

Anyway, peace, love, and harmony, Jesus' teachings. Have a nice day.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

If Genesis is a metaphor, then so is your god.

If your god didn't make Adam and Eve, didn't flood the planet, etc etc, then why do you worship a metaphor?

Idiot.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

I think you're ignoring the fact that I said "many of the stories in the bible never actually happened," they keyword being "many." Just to clarify, the definition of "many" isn't the same as the definition of "all." Just so I'm perfectly clear with you.

Also, ad hominem? Come on, man. You're just making yourself look like a jackass by using that.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

Ad Hominem??

Where the fuck did I say your argument was invalid based on irrelevant personal attributes of yourself?? Fucking moron.

Why dont you look Ad Hominem up, dumbfuck. Calling you an idiot isn't a fallacy, thats simply me being rude. My argument was ABOVE the insult, dipshit.

If you are going to cry about fallacies, it helps to actually have a fucking clue what they are.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

@ThatOneQuestion, calling me an idiot, and even in your last post, a "fucking moron" is ad hominem. Whenever you make a personal attack, such as calling somebody an idiot or a moron, that's ad hominem. You can't even explain what ad hominem is without using it.

You are pathetic! See, that's me using ad hominem. Before you attempt to argue back, I suggest you learn about logical fallacies, because you obviously don't have a clue.

Your arrogance blinds you of your ignorance.

[ThatOneQuestion]

Calling you a name isn't an Ad Hominem, dumbfuck.

Why dont you actually look up the fallacy in the first place.

Did you read the second fucking thing I said?? My SECOND statement in that reply was the response to the fallacy.

Talk about being blinded by arrogance. This is why I call you what you are: idiot.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

Actually, considering that calling somebody a "dumbfuck," "moron," and "idiot," are personal attacks, and considering that ad hominem is the use of personal attacks in an argument, then they are indeed ad hominem.

The only reason you're so pissed off right now is because you don't want to admit to a theist that you're wrong.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

Not the USE of, dumbfuck, but the core of the counter-argument to the point being commented on.

How fucking clueless are you?

Ad Hominem is replying to the argument by using personal attacks AS THE COUNTER ARGUMENT.

It is a LOGICAL fallacy, asshole, that requires ME to base the logic of my rebuttal in a personal attack ONLY.

You fucking lose, moron.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

If I lose, then I would be the one pissed off right now. Stop looking up definitions. The more you try to figure something out, the less you tend to know. Ad hominem is when one utilizes personal attacks during an argument. The fact of the matter is, you obviously had to look it up in order to figure out what it meant, which means that you had no idea what the hell I was talking about when I pointed out your use of ad hominem.

I'm glad I could teach you something, sunshine.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

I didn't look it up, I remembered what it was from my education. You clearly dont understand what the fallacy is all about, kid.

I LOVE how you arrogant shits think you know what an Ad Hominem is so you can demand people dont make fun of you.

The LOGICAL fallacy is about LOGIC, dumbfuck, not about being polite. I can call you anything I want as long as I actually present an argument other than a personal attack.

You dont have a fucking clue.

[ThatOneQuestion]

I am not required to provide you with a polite response, kid. I'm sick of idiots like you pretending like you have a clue.

Why dont you look up what a LOGICAL fallacy is.  That requires ME to have a failure of logic. Thats what a fallacy is.

Calling you names isn't a failure of logic, idiot.

In the first reply to you, I said what I said about metaphors, ending with calling you an idiot. Your improper use of the fallacy just shows how accurate my name calling is.

You lose.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

When you called me an idiot in my first post, that was ad hominem, going by the textbook definition, because it was a counter-argument to the argument I established in my first post. However, if you posted first, and I responded to you, then it wouldn't have been ad hominem, considering that you would have no clue as to whom you were arguing against.

Again, glad I could teach you a little something about logical fallicies, sunshine.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

No, calling you an idiot in the first post was NOT a logical fallacy because it has nothing to do with the argument at all. I already made the argument previously, moron.

Keep pretending like you understand what a logical fallacy is, idiot. I will be here to correct you.

You still worship a metaphor, by the way. Nice job.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

@ThatOneQuestion, actually, it did have something to do with the argument. You called me an idiot to undermind me in order to inhance your own argument by making your opponent look bad.

If it wasn't part of your argument, then you wouldn't have wrote it in the same response as your argument.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

It isn't part of my argument, dubmfuck, its part of my comment.

The argument was made, and I insulted you for being a fool for using that cop-out argument for literal vs metaphor stories, like just about every idiot Theist I've seen does.

No where are you able to say the book intended to be metaphorical, yet you say some stories are and some arn't WITH OUT being specific so you can get away with bullshit.

[ThatOneQuestion]

Think about it, you fucking retard; logical fallacy is a FAILURE of LOGIC.

Whats funny to me is that you retards always focus on the drama without actually reading the comment in the first place.

You see lots of text in the comment, then you see me mocking you with the VERY LAST word in the entire thing, and you call that a logical fallacy because I'm making fun of you??

You are such a fucking idiot.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

No, I called you out on your use of logical fallacies because they were so obvious in your comment. If you utilized the Rogerian method some, I would never have called you out.

The reason why you're so pissed off is because, as I said before, due to your prejudice, you don't want to admit to a theist that you're wrong, becuase that would damage your over-inflated ego too much.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

You wern't able to correctly identify a fallacy in the first place, hence the replies you are getting.

You just dont fucking get it, do you? You either dont understand the fallacy or you simply want to make shit up and pretend there is a fallacy in order to make yourself look better.

What a fucking idiot.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

Fine, then let's forget about your obvious use and denial of ad hominem, boy. Let's focus on literal vs. metaphorical stories. Literal stories in holy books are few and far between. Most stories are metaphorical, concering that they are put in place to teach a particular lesson. However, the bigger picture isn't whether the stories are true or not, it merely comes down to if you have faith in th religion or not. I have faith in Jesus. That's why I'm a Christian.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

You stupid child. I'm not going to change the subject until you go fucking look up what an Ad Hominem is.

Calling you names AFTER I make my argument is NOT a logical fallacy, dumbfuck.

See that? The argument was made and THEN I make fun of you for being what you are. That "dumbfuck" isn't part of the argument, its me being rude.

Where the fuck does it say I have to destroy your pathetic arguments politely in order to be logically sound?

[TheMightyTreeMan]

Use the Rogerian method of argumentation. The ability to know how to argue is a skill which grows as you learn the different aspects that go into an intelligent argument. The point of an argument is to get people to accept your point of view. However, you are too arrogant to even consider polite behavior, which does indeed go a long way in life.

Arrogance is the key to a sad and lonely life, kid. It's not a sign of weakness to be humble.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

Too arrogant to even consider polite behavior? No, certainly not with you. Your opening statements indicated to me that, based on the years I've spend debating Theists, I knew exactly where you would be going and that you would be using ancient fallacies.

I dont give a shit if YOU accept what I have to say, I'm looking for YOU to provide a reasonable argument.

You are simply incapable of doing so, however, as I figured.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

You're a fundamentalist, and it's the fundamentalist who's incapable of reason.

I brought up the fallacy because I'm smart. I know what it is I'm reading, because I've studied the art of argmentation. You, however, have spent your time having stupid debates over the internet, hiding behind a computer screen to justify your hatred towards everybody else. You are a coward.

[ThatOneQuestion]

You call me arrogant, thats fine.

I call you a classic Theist abusing fallacies and lying to get your way. I've delt with so many of you I have no time to waste being polite.

Why would I be polite to someone that I know will be intellectually dishonest? Being polite to someone implies respect. I dont respect people like you because of the arguments you make.

Children like you arn't deserving of respect.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

You know I would be intellectually dishonest? I'm not the one who obviously used an online encyclopedia to look up the definition of ad hominem, a logical fallacy which you have been abusing from the start, and I might add, you wouldn't have been abusing it if you had known what it meant.

[ThatOneQuestion]

You silly little child, I didn't have to look it up.

I have to educate you retards all the time about what the Ad Hominem actually is, especially over the last few years.

Stupid fucking idiot, your assumptions are getting you into trouble.

Also, I like the contradiction in your post.  You say I just looked it up, thereby saying I was right, but then cling to your old position that I was still using the fallacy... which I already refuted??

Fucking idiot.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

You looked up the fallacy. That much is obvious, but you obviously still don't have a clear understanding of what it actually means, hence why you continue to use it, even after all this time.

You just don't want to be wrong.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

Yes, I looked it up YEARS ago when I was learning about the whole debate thing.

What is obvious is that you NEVER have. You think that you have the right not to be offended, so you choose to fabricate a link to a logical fallacy.

What a fucking joke. You STILL havn't even looked it up.

I know its definition because I have to keep explaining it to retards like you ALL THE TIME! You are such an embarrassment.

[TheMightyTreeMan]

How can somebody with mental retardation know what a logical fallacy is? I smell a contradiction.

Also, calling me a retard is a logical fallacy in itself. It's called ad hominem.

[ThatOneQuestion]

.........that..... is what we have been talking about this whole time, you fucking moron.

You dont understand the Ad Hominem fallacy, and you have AGAIN failed to correctly apply it.

Did your brain seriously just hit a "restart" button and dump the entire conversation we just had here???

Are you so fucked up that you are simply ignoring everything we just talked about??

[TheMightyTreeMan]

More ad hominem on your part. Unbelievable. You have shown me some great examples, and for that I am truly appreciative.

As for everything else, I don't care. I stopped taking you seriously yesterday. I assume everything you say is a joke.

[ThatOneQuestion]

@TheMightyTreeMan

Those arn't Ad Hominems as i'm not making an argument, dumbfuck, I'm expressing my astonishment that your brain has taken a dump all over the place.

And no, you are pretending like you stopped talking at a certain time after I revealed your bullshit fabrication in "forgetting" which of us actually tried to quote statistics elsewhere just a little while ago.

You are such a pathetic coward.

[ThatOneQuestion]

talking = taking me seriously

TheMightTreeMan, I think its time to treat you like the two-faced liar you are.

You obviously think lying is a perfectly fine thing to do in an argument, like you told me in your private message. I dont.

I'll be honest: you disgust me.

And as you are obviously a child, its time to block you and send you on your way.

[FIREBURNER1000]

It's obvious people like ThisJustAwesome1 have been fed so much bull**it since they were first conceived that they'll believe in anything. He/she was like a video recorder with RECORD not turned on when watching the video. Anyway, to make a long story short, ThatOneQuestion is the AWESOME one for pointing these things out. Great job on your videos!!!

[ThisJustAwsome1]

Noah couldn't have done what the Bible says he did without help from God so Without God included in the equation of course it would have been impossible.

Believing in God must be "stupid " to you (because you don't believe he is their(or if you do you just don't believe he can do the seemingly impossible) but if someone says they don't believe in air because they have never seen it are they also stupid? It is consistent with your logic. Get rid of the air their going to wish they had it.

[ThatOneQuestion]

"Without God included in the equation of course it would have been impossible"

Yes, I know you cant validate anything without using magic. Thats the whole point.

Once you admit that it would be impossible without your god, you admit that the facts dont matter.

[ThatOneQuestion]

Oh, and yes, anyone who doesn't believe in air IS stupid.

We can do experiments to PROVE that oxygen exists.

You cant do a single test to prove to me that your god is real, and if you try you will always fail.

Why dont you pray to have little Sally, a 10 year old child who lost an arm, regrow that arm by tomorrow. What? Too greedy of a prayer? The child deserved it? You lose.

[ThisJustAwsome1]

You only need a 1% increase from each generation to reach the current population starting 4500 years ago.

[ThatOneQuestion]

"You only need a 1% increase"

You already said you need your Magic Man in order to make any of this possible.

Dont you dare try and be a dishonest little shit and say you can then apply math or science to prove it.

You obviously dont have a clue what you are talking about.

Unless you make your further attempts to refute the refutations on the Part 2 comment section, you will be blocked. I have no time to deal with idiots like you who didn't even watch the videos.

[omnissient]

That is an amusement park for families with children. They BUILT that thing.

[ThatOneQuestion]

Amusement park for families?

What, the Hong Kong replica? I completely agree.

Whats more, I would love to see them put it out to sea and just watch how long it will last before it structurally fails and sinks to the ocean floor.

Creationists never seem to understand just how many ways their blind faith fails them utterly.

[ThisJustAwsome1]

This video is just another example people trying to discredit the Bible but they can't do this honestly. Their are many very reasonable arguments that confirm the flood but all we get hear is distortion of the creationist point of view.

If you really wish to understand the flood and the creationist position look at more then just this incomplete and misleading portrayal shown hear.

[ThatOneQuestion]

Wow, that shows what a moron you are.

This part of the video is telling the flood story by paraphrasing the Bible itself and giving you the exact quotes.

After that I list the facts it claims.

Then I list the Creationist arguments IN SUPPORT of the flood.

Way to fail, dumbass. That just shows you didn't actually watch the video. If you comment again, it better be an apology or I'm removing your stupidity.

[ThisJustAwsome1]

while you may use "paraphrasing the Bible itself ...." which I applaud you for doing but your overall presentation doesn't fully give all the details plus you through some of your own comments (which is also fine because its your video) .I didn't say you didn't show some of the arguments. I just said that it is not the complete picture and their is much more then what is shown hear and that is true.

I'm sorry if you miss understood me. I applaud you passion even if it is misguided.

[ThatOneQuestion]

"I just said that it is not the complete picture"

Then feel free to add what I didn't. This is supposed to be your story, so tell me what I didn't put in.

I'm not going to quote three chapters of your religious book, I only have ten minutes of audio reading to do this. I'm covering the basics, not trying to replicate word for word. Yes, that is why I am paraphrasing.

[simak2]

Could you please send me a link to a reasonable arguement that confirms the flood? I've been looking for a while.

[ThatOneQuestion]

Thats the problem, simak2, there are no reasonable arguments because they all require religious faith and a willful ignorance of modern science, specifically geology.

There is a reason religion requires faith: its hard to believe, especially when there are so many other religions and lots of evidence against it.

[ThisJustAwsome1]

Noah's Ark: A Feasibility Study is the most compete analysis ever published regarding the gathering of animals to the Ark of Noah, provisions for their care and feeding, and the subsequent dispersion. The author has devoted seven years to this scholarly, systematic answer to virtually all the anti-Ark arguments, alleged difficulties with the biblical account, and other relevant questions. Nothing else like this has ever written before - an unanswerable vindication of Genesis.

[ThatOneQuestion]

"an unanswerable vindication of Genesis. "

Baseless assertion grounded in religious views.

Sorry, little boy, but you just dont get it.

Watch the 47 points standing against this fairy tale and you might have a clue.

Neolithic Chinese cultures survived before, during, and after the flood. The Akkadian Empire, and every single other culture alive in 2500 BC were completely unaware of a global flood.

Your hero wasted seven years of his life on propaganda easily refuted.

[ThatOneQuestion]

A feasibility study isn't feasible if it is grounded in faith and assertion, or premised with simply ignoring everything in the world that invalidates the story.

Every single aspect of that fairy tale, and every single argument Theists use to try to validate it are utterly fallacious.

Why are you so stupid, ThisJustAwsome1?

[ThisJustAwsome1]

If only eight people—Noahs family—survived the Flood, we would expect there to be historical evidence of a worldwide flood. If you think about it, the evidence would be historical records in the nations of the world, and this is what we have. Stories of the Flood—distorted though they may be—exist in practically all nations, from ancient Babylon onward(270 in all). This evidence must not be lightly dismissed. If there never was a worldwide Flood, why are there so many stories about it?

[ThatOneQuestion]

Why dont you actually try to find WHEN those stories were written to find out just how wrong you are.

That isn't evidence, not by a long shot.

Why are there so many flood stories? Oh gee, maybe because floods happen ALL THE TIME because this planet is 3/4ths WATER!!

Dumbass.

[ThisJustAwsome1]

Their is no (Hard)evidence contradicting the fact that all nations and cultures could(and I believe did) have their beginning within a few hundred years after the flood. All those that say other wise are not basing it on any hard evidence but on their own "best Guess" or "what sound like it could be true because it fits my version of what I think history was".

[ThatOneQuestion]

You said - Their is no (Hard)evidence contradicting the fact that all nations and cultures could... have their beginning within a few hundred years after the flood.

Holy shit, really? Try population growth.

How did 8 people reproduce enough to get back to China in a few decades to resume those cultures?

Dumbass. Stop and think about it, you stupid retard.

I addressed the population topic in one of my 47 points. Go watch part 2, idiot.

[bettySwollox]

Nice.

Especially I) the Grand canyon could have been made in 5 minutes.

I love the fact that PCS1 is featured in these quotes.

Looking forward to part two.

[ThatOneQuestion]

I had to add in that quote from PCS =)

Part 2 should be up tonight.

[ThatOneQuestion]

Alright-this video is PART ONE, which goes over the Proponent side of the whole debate.

Read the video description =)

Part 2 will cover all the arguments against this story as a literal event like Christian Creationists try to promote.

Currently, I have 47 different arguments that I have come by over the years.

All of them will be listed, including any additional ones I can think of.