We landed on the moon not once but six times. That is one hell of a conspiracy eh? 24 different astronauts. You deniers are just plain insane in the brain. * Apollo 11 landed 20 July 1969 * Apollo 12 landed 19 November 1969 * Apollo 14 landed 5 February 1971 * Apollo 15 landed 30 July 1971 * Apollo 16 landed 20 April 1972 * Apollo 17 landed 11 December 1972
@TheAlbanianmusic2010 ummmm... mythbusters proved the footprint could happen, y the flag is waving, y the astronaut in the shadow was lit up, tht it is possible for the shadows to be facing diff. directions, and tht there ar refletors on the moon. so if no one went to the moon how the fuck r there reflectors on the moon. exactly, so shut the fuck up and learn shit faggot. lmao
@SuperBugsbunny4 Myth busters are FUCKING faggots.. the flag was waving on the moon.. the moon doesnt have any atmosphere fucking dumbass. so explain why the flag was waving. STOP BEING A SCARED PUSSY AND JUST FACE THE FACT THAT IT NEVER HAPPEND ..
@steevo420vallejo r u realy tht stupid??? i watch all 5 parts of this and actually beleved we didnt land on the moon. but after i also watched the mythbusters 5 parts and they proved everything. even the flag waving. flags wave more in a vacum than in the atmosphere dip fuck. stop bein a scared pussy a watch the god damn vid. dnt tlk shit less u can back it up fag. hahahaha lmao
good theory .....i like it...i believe that the man never land on lunar surface....plus my lecturer had discuss about it once.....then what's wrong??...whether u guys believe it or not ...it 'ur choice....so dont argue with one another...
Dude we didn't go to the moon, stop believing in this Luciferian/Masonic Fraud. The Van Allen Belt is at 1000miles from Earth, The moon is at over 100.000 miles away. Yet the farthest the stay of the art spaceships we have today have only gone around 400 miles from Earth. At that distance astronauts were able to see radioactive isotopes when they had their eyes closed. Sorry NASA is a money making scheme of the military industrial complex. Long Live the Republic. Death to the new world order.
@JASONANDTRACI The densest and most dangerous parts of the VAB are located at the equatorial zone. The VAB can be compared with a doughnut. Apollo followed the TLI (Trans Lunar Injection). The TLI has an inclination of 30 degrees, so they went through the corners of the Belts.
@CHSarahBs Oh really, excellent reasoning but it is hogwash. I ask you ,why did the astronauts fake the image of Earth , taken supposedly from the moon or near the moon, by blocking out the space shuttle windows and leaving alone one window open with an overlay to make the Earth seem to be much smaller? Also from the moon, Earth should always be seen, except when on the dark side of the moon, why wouldn't ANY OF THE VIDEO CAMERA MEN turn around and take video of Earth from the moon?
@JASONANDTRACI This argument of faking the Earths side is absolutely nonsense. You claim, that they were in Low Earth Orbit when they made this sequence. Realizing to have a speed of 17.000 mph to maintain orbit you would see a MOVING EARTH. Adding to this: The cloud patterns are matching exactly, comparing them with meteorological datas from this day.
There are many photos available taken from the lunar surface with the visible Earth. You only have to google for them.
@CHSAlso you bring up pictures, WHERE IS THE VIDEO. Tell me where the video is of the astronauts playing golf with the Earth in the background or even at a glance. There are no video images because it was fake. For some reason you keep replying with bogus NASA rebuttal answers, DO YOUR OWN CRITICAL THINKING PLEASE. Also did you know ALL of the astronauts that went to the moon were 32nd and 33rd degree freemasons who are sworn to never reveal secrets unless they have their throats slit, etc.
@JASONANDTRACI What has freemasonery to do with science? What a stupid argument, when there is nothing else.
We were talking about faking Earths size by using overlayers, which is impossible. When were we talking about playing golf on Moon? Why should there be the Earth visible?
I do not follow NASA answers, I only use my brain. I do not follow the hoaxers hero Sibrel, Percy, Allen and their companions.
@CHSarahBs Freemasonry has everything to do with it because it is an organization that has the ability of KEEPING SECRETS SECRET. People always say, there would be people who would come out and expose NASA for their fraud. Would you whistleblow if your family is targeted for death, MOST PEOPLE NO WAY. By the way did you watch the video I sent you, or did you already make up your closed pathetic mind yet?
@JASONANDTRACI Which video you sent me? I have read again all your post directed to me, there was no video mentioned, only your question about a video of astronauts playing golf.
I do not follow your paranoia about freemansonry. I prefer to see solid proof. If you think this is pathetic, it is your opinion, which does not change any fact.
@CHSarahBs BECAUSE WE DIDN'T GO TO THE MOON, our Creator God put the VAn ALlen Belt around our Earth to protect us from space debri, etc. but also to keep fallen angels on Earth where they are banished, for it is written in the Bible. STOP BEING DECEIVED BY MEN. Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life......
well its simple the extra lighting is the light reflected off of the surface of the moon, which is highly reflective.. it is a fine grain of glass dust.
Thats why we must also account for a secondary source of lighting- The moons surface and not some Studio/ stage light LOL
Everything he says is true, provided his premisses are truthful. In other words he's assuming a bunch of things he's not certain of, and if these are true, then his argument is perfectly truthful. For instance, why won't he talk about the earth and the stars and potential light sources?he ignores them! Moreover why does he assume the astronauts ARE AT THE SAME HEIGHT??? Why won't he mention the possibility of the astronauts being at different heights? I tell you, it's not convenient for him...
Dr. Useless has that same self satisfied smug look on his face as we see in door stepping Christians. Trying to analyse the photographic characteristics of an envirnoment he's never been to and pretending to know everything.
dosnt matter theres a race on now to send rovers to the moon 2 things will happen a) flag will be there the moon sites will be the same as well as the physics of light or b) it will look nothing like this and infact be made of cheese :D i personally dont think its a lie i mean why would they lie as truth always comes out in the end also what would russia make of it heh maybe some photos was faked for media hype who knows but cant be a lie
psydo scientific nit picky clap trap? Appologist talk at it's finest. Actually the principles of lighting afre completly scientific and well established.
The computer behind him proves he really has the most advanced tech on earth :)
What this a*ole doesn't tell you is that light bounces. Fill light is not necessary a second light source, it is reflected light. The hot spot is called 'specular highlight' and again is not caused by a second light.
An obvious question, I think no one seems to ask is: WHY THE HELL SHOULD THEY USE A SECOND LIGHT SOURCE?
wow
billpage 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We landed on the moon not once but six times. That is one hell of a conspiracy eh? 24 different astronauts. You deniers are just plain insane in the brain. * Apollo 11 landed 20 July 1969 * Apollo 12 landed 19 November 1969 * Apollo 14 landed 5 February 1971 * Apollo 15 landed 30 July 1971 * Apollo 16 landed 20 April 1972 * Apollo 17 landed 11 December 1972
TheThumper49 2 months ago
@TheAlbanianmusic2010 ummmm... mythbusters proved the footprint could happen, y the flag is waving, y the astronaut in the shadow was lit up, tht it is possible for the shadows to be facing diff. directions, and tht there ar refletors on the moon. so if no one went to the moon how the fuck r there reflectors on the moon. exactly, so shut the fuck up and learn shit faggot. lmao
SuperBugsbunny4 8 months ago
thats retarded. mythbusters already provved it was real. so get a fuckin life.
SuperBugsbunny4 8 months ago
@SuperBugsbunny4 Myth busters are FUCKING faggots.. the flag was waving on the moon.. the moon doesnt have any atmosphere fucking dumbass. so explain why the flag was waving. STOP BEING A SCARED PUSSY AND JUST FACE THE FACT THAT IT NEVER HAPPEND ..
steevo420vallejo 7 months ago
@steevo420vallejo r u realy tht stupid??? i watch all 5 parts of this and actually beleved we didnt land on the moon. but after i also watched the mythbusters 5 parts and they proved everything. even the flag waving. flags wave more in a vacum than in the atmosphere dip fuck. stop bein a scared pussy a watch the god damn vid. dnt tlk shit less u can back it up fag. hahahaha lmao
NCRetroGamer 7 months ago
@NCRetroGamer Dont take my lines faggot .. GO FUCK YOURSELF =) Das all I gotta say about that
steevo420vallejo 7 months ago
good theory .....i like it...i believe that the man never land on lunar surface....plus my lecturer had discuss about it once.....then what's wrong??...whether u guys believe it or not ...it 'ur choice....so dont argue with one another...
live2life92 8 months ago 2
SHOUTS OUT IF YOU ARE LOST IN HIS EXPLANATION
cunit90 9 months ago
check out the Myth busters moon hox busting video.... for proof about the Photographs
amoghakrishnas 11 months ago
Dude we didn't go to the moon, stop believing in this Luciferian/Masonic Fraud. The Van Allen Belt is at 1000miles from Earth, The moon is at over 100.000 miles away. Yet the farthest the stay of the art spaceships we have today have only gone around 400 miles from Earth. At that distance astronauts were able to see radioactive isotopes when they had their eyes closed. Sorry NASA is a money making scheme of the military industrial complex. Long Live the Republic. Death to the new world order.
JASONANDTRACI 9 months ago
@JASONANDTRACI The densest and most dangerous parts of the VAB are located at the equatorial zone. The VAB can be compared with a doughnut. Apollo followed the TLI (Trans Lunar Injection). The TLI has an inclination of 30 degrees, so they went through the corners of the Belts.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs Oh really, excellent reasoning but it is hogwash. I ask you ,why did the astronauts fake the image of Earth , taken supposedly from the moon or near the moon, by blocking out the space shuttle windows and leaving alone one window open with an overlay to make the Earth seem to be much smaller? Also from the moon, Earth should always be seen, except when on the dark side of the moon, why wouldn't ANY OF THE VIDEO CAMERA MEN turn around and take video of Earth from the moon?
JASONANDTRACI 9 months ago
@JASONANDTRACI This argument of faking the Earths side is absolutely nonsense. You claim, that they were in Low Earth Orbit when they made this sequence. Realizing to have a speed of 17.000 mph to maintain orbit you would see a MOVING EARTH. Adding to this: The cloud patterns are matching exactly, comparing them with meteorological datas from this day.
There are many photos available taken from the lunar surface with the visible Earth. You only have to google for them.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs I am not claiming it is fact,you want to see the video, here watch it> w w w.://darkdata.net/astronauts-gone-wild/
JASONANDTRACI 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs Astronauts gone Wild
h t t p://darkdata.net/astronauts-gone-wild/
JASONANDTRACI 9 months ago
@JASONANDTRACI Ah now I see, which video you meant. Sorry I have read over this comment. I take a closer look for this video.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs LOOOOOOOOL. You are really referring to a Sibrel-video? This stupid liar is your reference?
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSAlso you bring up pictures, WHERE IS THE VIDEO. Tell me where the video is of the astronauts playing golf with the Earth in the background or even at a glance. There are no video images because it was fake. For some reason you keep replying with bogus NASA rebuttal answers, DO YOUR OWN CRITICAL THINKING PLEASE. Also did you know ALL of the astronauts that went to the moon were 32nd and 33rd degree freemasons who are sworn to never reveal secrets unless they have their throats slit, etc.
JASONANDTRACI 9 months ago
@JASONANDTRACI What has freemasonery to do with science? What a stupid argument, when there is nothing else.
We were talking about faking Earths size by using overlayers, which is impossible. When were we talking about playing golf on Moon? Why should there be the Earth visible?
I do not follow NASA answers, I only use my brain. I do not follow the hoaxers hero Sibrel, Percy, Allen and their companions.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs Freemasonry has everything to do with it because it is an organization that has the ability of KEEPING SECRETS SECRET. People always say, there would be people who would come out and expose NASA for their fraud. Would you whistleblow if your family is targeted for death, MOST PEOPLE NO WAY. By the way did you watch the video I sent you, or did you already make up your closed pathetic mind yet?
JASONANDTRACI 9 months ago
@JASONANDTRACI Which video you sent me? I have read again all your post directed to me, there was no video mentioned, only your question about a video of astronauts playing golf.
I do not follow your paranoia about freemansonry. I prefer to see solid proof. If you think this is pathetic, it is your opinion, which does not change any fact.
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
@CHSarahBs BECAUSE WE DIDN'T GO TO THE MOON, our Creator God put the VAn ALlen Belt around our Earth to protect us from space debri, etc. but also to keep fallen angels on Earth where they are banished, for it is written in the Bible. STOP BEING DECEIVED BY MEN. Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life......
JASONANDTRACI 9 months ago
well its simple the extra lighting is the light reflected off of the surface of the moon, which is highly reflective.. it is a fine grain of glass dust.
Thats why we must also account for a secondary source of lighting- The moons surface and not some Studio/ stage light LOL
amoghakrishnas 11 months ago
Where's the last part of the FOX documentary?
mattsnow81 1 year ago 2
that phot was no even taken on the moon
datzfast 1 year ago
I can see why americans seem to think British are posh, don't worry, not all us brits are posh AND retarded.
ImpalerOfSouls 2 years ago
Everything he says is true, provided his premisses are truthful. In other words he's assuming a bunch of things he's not certain of, and if these are true, then his argument is perfectly truthful. For instance, why won't he talk about the earth and the stars and potential light sources?he ignores them! Moreover why does he assume the astronauts ARE AT THE SAME HEIGHT??? Why won't he mention the possibility of the astronauts being at different heights? I tell you, it's not convenient for him...
Apsi91 2 years ago
Dr. Useless has that same self satisfied smug look on his face as we see in door stepping Christians. Trying to analyse the photographic characteristics of an envirnoment he's never been to and pretending to know everything.
nasnema 2 years ago
how is it fake??
HoribiFuckis 2 years ago
4:57 lol ;)
jeffdahmerzombie 3 years ago
When you think about it the pics are too good. Too professional. For Astronauts it would be the last thing to worry about. Edmund Hillary
was an international hero for climbing Mt Everest. Where are our Astro Nots. ?????
Easydollars 3 years ago 2
The Astronauts wouldn't have worried about it - why would they? People on the ground would've handled that.
hrthrhs 2 years ago
They were touched up later tho. Like any marks or blemishes would be removed and probably overall improved the quality
Robotdrummerzzk 2 years ago
dosnt matter theres a race on now to send rovers to the moon 2 things will happen a) flag will be there the moon sites will be the same as well as the physics of light or b) it will look nothing like this and infact be made of cheese :D i personally dont think its a lie i mean why would they lie as truth always comes out in the end also what would russia make of it heh maybe some photos was faked for media hype who knows but cant be a lie
DJDiscDrive 3 years ago
lOOK AT THAT ASSHOLE BRIAN WELCH-WOULD U BELIEVE THIS LYING PIECE OF SHIT?i WOULDN'T.
U CAN TELL HE'S LYING OUT HIS ASS JUST BY LOOKING AT HIM AND LISTENING HOW HE TRIES TO DEBUNK EVERYTHING.HE'S FULL OF SHIT.
cadu1995 3 years ago
psydo scientific nit picky clap trap? Appologist talk at it's finest. Actually the principles of lighting afre completly scientific and well established.
stalkervision 3 years ago 2
The computer behind him proves he really has the most advanced tech on earth :)
What this a*ole doesn't tell you is that light bounces. Fill light is not necessary a second light source, it is reflected light. The hot spot is called 'specular highlight' and again is not caused by a second light.
An obvious question, I think no one seems to ask is: WHY THE HELL SHOULD THEY USE A SECOND LIGHT SOURCE?
borisyankov 3 years ago
and damnnit i wanna see the rest of this wheres part 6?
the4x4ster 3 years ago 2