Dr Roy Spencer on Global Warming Part 3 of 6

[rockpianoguy]

Dr. Roy Spencer has written a book where he says cloud variability causes global warming and not us. It certainly is correlated with global warming but it is not the cause of it but only the after affect. . He wants to a maverick. I respect that. However, he should know the quantum physics of global warming. He does not. When sun light passes through a planets atmosphere, it absorbs light at a specific frequency and then it reflects back of it's surface into space and into the telescope.

[rockpianoguy]

The black bands show that light is absorbed at a specific color or frequency of light. Every gas has a unique set of bands since it blocks light at a specific frequency or color. We knew that Mars and Venus had Co2 and no Oxygen long before we ever sent a space probe there because astronomers put a spectrometer like a prism at the end of the telescope which splits the light coming from the planet into colors with spectral bands so they could identify what gases were in a planetary atmosphere.

[rockpianoguy]

My point is each gas absorbs light at a very specific frequency.  We discovered this by putting a particular gas like oxygen, Co2, hydrogen, nitrogen etc into a clear glass chamber and shined a light rough it. As the light passes through the chamber it passes through a prism on the other side which splits light up into rainbow colors on the wall. Scientists noticed that thin black lines were parallel with the color bands. Each gas has a unique set of black lines called spectral lines.

[rockpianoguy]

Since I understand quantum physics, I know that global warming is man made. The lightest elements like H, and He absorb light waves towards the ultra violet frequency and the heavier elements absorb light more towards the infrared. This is scientific fact. Co2 absorbs light near the largest amount of infrared heat radiation which leaves our Earth. O3 or ozone gas absorbs light and the ultra violet frequency. Why? The heavier, larger elements because they have more electrons in their shells

[rockpianoguy]

Anyone can get their papers peer reviewed and published. One does not even have to be a scientist. Who did the peer reviews? Not scientists who understand the science of global warming. One does not even have to be a scientist to understand the science of global warming. I got my data from a book called Absolutely Small which shows that it global warming is proven by quantum physics. The awesome thing about it is you don't have to be a scientist to understand it.

[rockpianoguy]

He designed the sattelite but he don't know crap about how to analyize the data. He is a nit wit. He will never work for NASA again and he doesn't work there now. All the major scientists of the world in many countries have seen the data. I believe them not some crackpot who shows to me he knows nothing about the science of global warming.

[jinx4848]

@rockpianoguy then why were his papers peer reviewed and published, if the data was wrong? where are you getting YOUR data?

[rockpianoguy]

This is the one of only a few scientists with a degree which believes the global warming data is wrong and there is no global warming. he ain't no Einstein.

[Finlandcitizen]

@rockpianoguy

He isin't saying there ain't no Global Warming, watch the video.

[rockpianoguy]

This is rediculous. This guy is saying that the sattelite models don't mach the computer models shown by the IPCC, yet if you look at the NASA website right now today it says that the computer models DO match the sattelite data. I'm supposed to believe this unscienfitic rubbish? It doesn't even look professional. It makes no sense and there is no data to support his ridiculous untruths.

[Finlandcitizen]

@rockpianoguy

Does NASA really say that the models correct with the long term low cloud effect?

Becouse consider this man was the LEAD DESIGNER of NASA's Agua satellite that actually makes it possible to make cloud data available better then CERES. By using that simple logic we could determine that if all of hi's science is rubbish, then NASA data on clouds is rubbish.

[centurion180ad]

It is very difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on him not understanding it.

America is trapped in a political economy. It is becoming more & more impossible to implement an optimal solution. There are too many layers of bureaucracy, and too many special interests that must be pandered to. Arianna Huffington

[WanderingSeer]

@centurion180ad Huffington is a twit.

[centurion180ad]

@WanderingSeer In this particular case, she is correct.