I'm going to have to call bullshit on that cause my 06 six Banger stang stays at the rear quarter of my buddy's 05 goat and all I have is a sct tune, duels, intake, mabey the goat was boosting I would belive that. Or the stangs driver can't drive. Either way! either way!
hell yea. i dont think he was really trying, that or he had no turbo lol... my 6er will run...then again shes got an alcohol injcted blower, stage 3 heads and cams... but it aint the best thing on the road...far from it. however im selling my x charger extreme, and going with about a 76 MM turbo... should be intresting then. made 580 whp on a 76 mmin a 3.8 stroked to 4.3
im not saying the mustang would have won, he obviously wouldnt have, but next time you might wanna actaully wait until both cars are ready, instead of just speeding off after a honk or two....
I think you are the silly one for even bringing up your car in this conversation, unless you spent a silly amount of money into your car... if not, good luck getting your 15 second car to do anything.... my 2005 Lincoln LS ran 14.7 @ 98MPH, if 2005-2010 4.0L V6 S197's run slower than a stock lincoln I really contest your statement
@CynthiaJacquelyn oh no. there's no way a stock would perform well. i've had many mods done to mine. air intake replaced, throttle body, air housing, i have an x pattern duel exhaust, i have a custom tune by BAMA, and long piper headers. im in the process now of getting started on supercharge. but i agree stock is slow and limited.
Mustang fans pollute this whole "youtube" website. As soon as you post on of them getting there ass whooped the other 2 millions ball hoppers jump in. In the end, you still drive a ford..
Ok putting a GM 5.7L LS1 vs. a Ford 4.0L v6 and feeling "bad ass" for beating it is just stupid. I'll say right now gto's are a joke in the v8 world. Try racing a vette or a mustang cobra, get embarrassed, then post the vid. Btw that stang will rape any other v6 on its class. Trust me. I own one.
Sorry but no, a 2005 GTO traps 109MPH stock.... that 4.0L would need a shortblock stressing amount of PSI to even break even with a lightly modded LS2 GTO. I have a 2006 and I roll with mustang guys, we have an X charged 2006 4.0L with about 5K worth of suspension work, full bolt on's, 12 PSI, skinnies up front and slicks in the back with a 3800 stall and he ran a one time BEST of 12.7 @ 106MPH on a 40F day... during the summer he runs low 13's all day @ around 102MPH
@CynthiaJacquelyn Turbo is completely different than SC in these cars, a SC is almost useless on a V6, because of the power lost to power it, the same car with a turbo with the same boost will put out better numbers. i'm not to big on the 4.0, i have a 3.8 2001, which is underpowered, but when i get to modding it i'm just buying a custom block so i dont have to deal with limiting myself
I hate when people try to race me in my Mustang. I own V6 for insurance reasons and I have no need to race cocky "V8" owners and all around assholes that honk at me and think that I'll just put my foot through the floor.
@zoddie stock???? do you not clearly hear the turbo spool up on this thing? People need to understand the v6 isnt that great here... its just aiming for economy... A turbo 6 stang cant even take down a a bolt on mach 1....just shut up next time
@Texarmageddon um, that all depends on what size turbo youre putting on? just slapping it with a label v6 turbo doesnt mean its going to be slow, just because the n/a form is.. with a small turbo, probably not, but you could probably slap a gt35 on it with some relatively inexpensive mods.. so saying that the car will never be fast is arrogant
@Texarmageddon I think ignorant was the word you were looking for.... inexpensive shouldn't even be included.... anyhow.. just talking about a stang running near 6-10 psi.... a bolt mach 1 should beat that.
@blackjacksmitty psh, youre telling me, i blew my stock tranny and stock 7.5, got a 8.8 out of a GT with some 3.73s in now, i like the look and sound of fords, but hot damn those LS engines are beasts, but yeah ill PM you and let you know, good luck with the GTO!
@blackjacksmitty this summer i ran a best of 12.08 @ 117 on streets with NT555R rears, still need to invest in better suspension and slicks lol, have yet to use the nitrous kit this summer, the tuners at livernois were worried about the zex kit and the powerhouse turbo would be too much for a stock bottom end, but optimistically it should put down just shy of 500whp on a 3500lbs car, with driver, dont have funds for a bottom end anymore :(
@blackjacksmitty you near the michigan area? im going to milan dragway next weekend, if you wanna meet up, powerhouse single turbo and a 100shot zex kit is what im running, whats all done to your gto?
@dlinegarcia60 First off (relax bro) I have a 6.0 gto, and i know that the Mustang GT and the goat are neck and neck. You need to calm down, and take a deep breathe. I've watched all the vids. and i dont care. I love my gto, but i highly respect the mustang. Win some, lose some ;-)
It REALLY didn't seem like he was racing, or racing very well. GTOs vs Mustang GT 4.6s are really even races, and a turbo v6 puts out more than a N/A GT and they're lighter...
Man, i wish i knew where these people lived cuz i know that my v6 will run that GTO over. My 2.0L Neon will put it in place. Pontiac went out of business for a reason people. They Suckkkkk
@xXxiTzCoNoRxXx No shit!? Oh my god! I never would have thought in a million years a newer more powerful V8 with a lighter body could beat an older V8 with a heavier body! No way!
I have a bone-stock v6 mustang, and, speaking purely from experience, that was not a race. That 'stang wasn't even accelerating. Nice try, though. I guess that's why GTOs no longer exist while Mustangs are still running strong.
definitely not a turbo , or not racing , I have a vortech and stock gto's can't hang , modded is a different story , ls1's are a beast . but stock is not gonna beat a turbo car , they are running anywhere between mid 12's and high 11's
yeah tht mustang wasnt racing at all lol. ive scraped on the gto's in my 2006 v6 supercharged mustang at only 6 psi. then again it was from a dead start too...not a 60-70 mph roll lol
@mattwhiteyanks1 I dont understand why there are so many LS vs V6 mustang (turbo or not) videos. Of course a LS1 or LS2 is gonna beat a friggin pre 2011 Mustang V6, i dont care if it has a turbo. Its a 4 Liter iron piece of shit! Now you throw a turbo on the 2011 Mustang V6, and thats another story....That race I'd actually give props to a stock LS1 for soundly beating! Keep in mind though a 06 GTO can keep up with a brand new SS or 5.0. Basically its like you beat up a retard in this video
@mattwhiteyanks1 he had a turbo in that and yet when he "Raced" you i didnt hear a whine. must be a very very very hi-tech turbo. this kid is obviously happy he passed a mustang on a highway.
@graborangemus if it has more than a turbo then yea but with just a turbo sorry you arent going to gain 200rwhp from just a turbo now if it has supporting mods then yea easly and 390rwhp will smoke a semi worked gto prob be a good race for mine to be honest im 435rwhp
@cojakc thats crap. your lookin at a 400hp/400tq gto vs a 210hp/240tq mustang, stock. you say you smoked gtos in your supercharged 6psi stang? Xcharger is probably one of the best brands out there for the supercharged v6 stangs and the new intercooled xchargers people running 13psi are still only getting 340-350hp to the wheels(not counting all the supporting mods), a gto makes more than that stock. i have a 2005 ls2 m6 gto. i have $100 in my pocket saying i smoke your stang.
@RBCantrell727 the GTO makes 400hp/400tq at the crank , it would b a great race for a stock Gto vs a F.I. of any kind v6 mustang , now modified Gto would b a different story
@graborangemus and like i said. the intercooled xcharger running 13psi of boost still makes 330-350ish rwhp depending all the other mods you put into it. a gto is 355hp/365tq stock rwhp. f.i. vs.all motor? but the point of my comment was dude up there said he has "scraped on the gto's... at only 6 psi." i was calling bullshit. im not hating on the mustangs, my first car was a 2005 v6 5speed. im just stating numbers and facts from experience and research when i had my stang.
oh Im not hating either , I almost purchased a 2004 Gto , and no I don't think 6 psi would b an ass whooping , but it would b a good race due to the lighter mustang . the gto is probably losing a little more then 45 hp at the wheels , id say more like 60 . most dyno charts I see for it puts it in the 330-345 range , but the gto has a much bigger platform with regards to performance , a couple of bolt ons and you got a rocket
@graborangemus i've never personally had mine dynoed, but every single "bone stock ls2 gto" dyno i've seen on youtube says 355hp/365tq to the wheels. STILL main point is saying 6psi v6 mustang wouldnt come anywhere close to a stock ls2 gto.
its definitely losing at least 60 to the wheels , search gto forums . 15-20% loss to the wheels 60-80 horse power loss , so now your talking 320-340 horsepower range / 6#s will get you at least 300 on the mustang / now factor in the 346 extra pounds the gto is carrying , quarter mile times for gto is 13.4- 13.7 / 6#s 13.5- 13.9 that s kind of close
@graborangemus 6psi might get you 300 to the crank but not the wheels. i have done my research on it when i had my stang and xchargers which is the best v6 supercharger for the stang gives it 275ish to the wheels at 8-9psi (based on memory, too lazy to search it again) and 9 psi making 275 to the wheels is a little over 100rwhp gain. and i know for facts from research intercooled xchargers at 13.5 psi is giving to 340-350 to the wheels (read that on forums) at !13.5! psi. A LOOOT more than 6 psi
guess my memory isn't as good as it used to b !! went and looked at archives , best 6 #s with custom tune was 270 at the wheels / best quarter was 13.8 , I guess the only disagreement have with ya now is the x charger being the best , as I have a Vortech ! id challenge an x anytime
@graborangemus well from forums and people trying stuff i heard all good from both brands. idk much about vortechs and how they work, i know they are like a belt driven turbo/ turbo style lookin supercharger kinda deal. making less low end power vs the belt driven intake manifold style xcharger. but like i said i dont know much about vortech so your welcome to correct the crap outa me lol.
ha ha ha yes its a centrifugal superchager , like a turbo but belt driven , it has a linear boost curve , the more rmps , the more boost it makes , im pushing 13 #s with a pretty safe tune , 11.8 a/f ratio . the x is more popular I think for ease of installation , sound , and look . but its pricey . the fastest x I know of is a 12.6 car , fastest Vortech is 11.0 , with out a built motor of coarse, there is a 2005 4.0 Vortech race car running 10's but lots done to it
@ekkvj are you all oblivious to the fact that a well built Turbo v6 still isn't gonna usually see over 380 horse? As where the goats are 400 on HP and TQ stock.
no offense... but there is no way that mustang was actually racing.. i didn't hear a downshift. I did hear the turbo but it was obviously a rear mount and if he had downshifted you would have heard the whistle a LOT louder, and a V6 mustang turbo will run, at the very least, a 12.5 or faster, and a completely stock 05 gto will run a high 13 to maybe 13.5's... sorry facts speak for themselves.
@mattwhiteyanks1 lol... you obviously know nothing about cars... a well built turbo v6 can be well over 700 whp... a non built turbo v6 can be in the neighborhood of 400 whp... that is horsepower to the wheels... your 400 hp is horsepower to the crank, you'd be lucky to see 340 to the wheels, plus the fact that your gto weighs about 3800 lbs where as the v6 mustang weighs about 3400... a huge differance... and I have amazing speakers and I know what a downshift sounds like... watch my videos...
@probercr93 700 HP daily driver mustang driven by a 17 year old....realistically ...how often do you see that? Does this video have the title fully built mustang at 20 psi vs GTO? Sure, they're are much cater cars than mine, Just not this one
@mattwhiteyanks1 I wasn't saying that this one is a 700hp car, but you said a well built turbo v6 was 380 hp, I was just stateing that a well built V6 is capable of 700whp. this one is probably near 400whp, where as your car is 400 crank hp which is about 340whp, plus his car is lighter. don't get me wrong I think the 6.0L gto's are pretty cool cars, and built are amazing. but there is no way this guy was really racing and you pulled that hard. you might pull like that on a non turbo car though
@probercr93 he said he was around 320 HP. It was a Turbo car. He did try to race. Was it a great running car at the time, no. Obviously not. He's added a few things and increased boost since last run. Ill see if we can set up another run soon.
@probercr93 dude...the V6 stang puts down 210BHP...you rlly expected the turbo kit to increase him to 460BHP(which translates to 400whp...that is fucking ridiculous to even think, pull your head outta the clouds kid, your sounding like a ricer. Get ur numbers right.
@GTO19020 actually, how about you research before you post... Yes I do expect a turbo to make that much of a differance... try this... look up "turbo v6 mustang" and you'll find plenty of dyno runs with pretty much all of them being over 400whp... and all that on the STOCK bottom end. I'm far from a ricer. I do own and race 2 turbocharged vehicles one of which being a mustang, however it is a V8... I am far from a kid... but nice try... please do your homework before commenting @ me... thanks
@probercr93 a turbo with hellaa boost to make 400rwhp with no forged internals? i know another guy went the same route and blew his motor within the first week. definitely should invest in forged internals to push tht much power from the v6
@cojakc not to mention the stock 7 inch rear end can safely withstand bout 300+ a lil rwhp, with the gt rear end and maybe some gears, youll pull harder and safely support more power with a lil peace of mind
@cojakc you're looking at around 13lbs of boost for around 400whp and of course you would want to build the bottom end for longevity... but I know of plenty of people making that kind of power for over 2 years on the stock bottom end... and tuning is a def. must.
@probercr93 fail for a second time...and maybe you didnt just watch the vid and clearly the turbo began to spool....i know u think a turbo is a be all and end all, but its not *cough*ricer*cough* and yeah, built with new heads, intake, exhaust, cam, shorties, ect im sure one could lay down 400hp...but not stock...dude, i owned a 06 V6 stang (check my vids)...do you have any ideas what kind of weak cam and heads are on that thing? Time for YOU to do some research lol
@GTO19020 obviously you don't even know what a "ricer" is. Furthermore you don't want a big cam with a "blown" car, the overlap just allows the boost to go out the exhaust, so the cam in the v6 is just fine, you do not need an "intake" because that would come with the turbo kit. You do NOT need shorties the exhaust manifolds would flow just fine for a turbo car. Granted heads would make a differance, but you don't need them to make 400whp. And a "built" motor isn't what you just stated.
@GTO19020 Those are bolt ons, with the exception of maybe the heads... however a built motor is when you put take the motor apart and build the bottom end to take more power... but the 4.0 doesn't need that to achieve 400whp... I'm sorry my friend again you have failed to prove your point... and if you watch my videos I OWN a 2005 mustang GT turbocharged... when you get the knowhow and can afford any of this... then come talk... otherwise you're obviously out of your league...
@probercr93 lol clearly your someone with more cash than intelligence, but yeah, not GT...good job on boosting an aluminum block never meant for forced induction, when you blow your rods, ill most likely simply point and laugh at you, and can afford? excuse me, i drive a 05 GTO...ya know, that car with a bigger motor and much better interior than your rustang. btw a new GTO is about 5K more than your rustang and stock for stock would slap it around like a cheap bitch, dont lecture me about
@GTO19020 finance, when my car is worth more than your cheap soccer mom mobile. (god i only see about 20 Rustangs a day) its called an IRS, maybe your rustang should try it sometime. and the shaker series, sounds like shit XD In case your wondering my profession, its Mech. Engineer...ya know, that thing you would never in a million years have the intelligence to do, next time, watch who you mouth off to kid.
@GTO19020 lol... I just checked KBB and both our cars @ 46000 miles (how much my car has) and both cars with the same options, my cars private party value is $17,100 and your car is $16,700. So what does that mean? Your car depresiates faster than mine? Because nobody wants it? I guess... but anyway, I'm going to take this to your message box and disprove the rest of your theorys there because I'm sure this guy doesn't want to see anymore negative posts on his video... thanks
@probercr93 omg man, you did message me and i shut you down, like the previous comment you left, dont message me and comment back, i dont think i cant handle all your clever arguements and quick witted responses (sarcasm) =)
@GTO19020 I love GTO's for performance, but I could never buy one...They look like bloated Cavaliers! Not a GM hater, in fact I owned a 95 TA and 02 Z28 before my 2011 V6 Mustang. I seem to be in the minority of people that like both Ford and GM...I just dislike Dodge, making overpriced cars that are slowed down by a ton of weight! But I can understand people not liking Ford before 2011....I wouldnt have touched a Mustang before now
Something sounded alot like a supercharger at the very beginning of the video. Those 4.0 V6's are slow as hell too, even with a turbo.. and those GTO's are just badass to begin with. nice video. check out my page and please subscribe!
I'm sure you're right...I mean, with his downshift to build rpms as well as boost and the nod of his head when i said, "going on three"...those were all quinky dinks I suppose
Weak...
Codeblauananas 1 day ago
Am i the only one that heard the GTO whistling when he was getting on the interstate?
logut80 3 weeks ago
the v6 wasnt racing him lmao. my 06 gt would kill your punk ass
steelstrings1312 1 month ago
I'm going to have to call bullshit on that cause my 06 six Banger stang stays at the rear quarter of my buddy's 05 goat and all I have is a sct tune, duels, intake, mabey the goat was boosting I would belive that. Or the stangs driver can't drive. Either way! either way!
egarza3818 2 months ago
hell yea. i dont think he was really trying, that or he had no turbo lol... my 6er will run...then again shes got an alcohol injcted blower, stage 3 heads and cams... but it aint the best thing on the road...far from it. however im selling my x charger extreme, and going with about a 76 MM turbo... should be intresting then. made 580 whp on a 76 mmin a 3.8 stroked to 4.3
bmxfire37 2 months ago
im not saying the mustang would have won, he obviously wouldnt have, but next time you might wanna actaully wait until both cars are ready, instead of just speeding off after a honk or two....
crustycrak 2 months ago
my 2007 v6 would destroy this car. silly kids.
coheedatreyu 2 months ago
@coheedatreyu
I think you are the silly one for even bringing up your car in this conversation, unless you spent a silly amount of money into your car... if not, good luck getting your 15 second car to do anything.... my 2005 Lincoln LS ran 14.7 @ 98MPH, if 2005-2010 4.0L V6 S197's run slower than a stock lincoln I really contest your statement
CynthiaJacquelyn 2 months ago
@CynthiaJacquelyn oh no. there's no way a stock would perform well. i've had many mods done to mine. air intake replaced, throttle body, air housing, i have an x pattern duel exhaust, i have a custom tune by BAMA, and long piper headers. im in the process now of getting started on supercharge. but i agree stock is slow and limited.
coheedatreyu 2 months ago
Mustang fans pollute this whole "youtube" website. As soon as you post on of them getting there ass whooped the other 2 millions ball hoppers jump in. In the end, you still drive a ford..
bOOSTEDjOSH 2 months ago
He didnt even race u
xxdarkheartsxx 3 months ago 4
Ok putting a GM 5.7L LS1 vs. a Ford 4.0L v6 and feeling "bad ass" for beating it is just stupid. I'll say right now gto's are a joke in the v8 world. Try racing a vette or a mustang cobra, get embarrassed, then post the vid. Btw that stang will rape any other v6 on its class. Trust me. I own one.
justinbernal09 3 months ago 5
@justinbernal09 not to mention that if it had a turbo it would be just as fast as the GTO, if not faster
willpw314 2 months ago
@willpw314
Sorry but no, a 2005 GTO traps 109MPH stock.... that 4.0L would need a shortblock stressing amount of PSI to even break even with a lightly modded LS2 GTO. I have a 2006 and I roll with mustang guys, we have an X charged 2006 4.0L with about 5K worth of suspension work, full bolt on's, 12 PSI, skinnies up front and slicks in the back with a 3800 stall and he ran a one time BEST of 12.7 @ 106MPH on a 40F day... during the summer he runs low 13's all day @ around 102MPH
CynthiaJacquelyn 2 months ago
@CynthiaJacquelyn Turbo is completely different than SC in these cars, a SC is almost useless on a V6, because of the power lost to power it, the same car with a turbo with the same boost will put out better numbers. i'm not to big on the 4.0, i have a 3.8 2001, which is underpowered, but when i get to modding it i'm just buying a custom block so i dont have to deal with limiting myself
willpw314 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You sound like a faggot
saucywalnuts 3 months ago
even the 04 gto came with 350 horses, a boosted v6 is at 300 horses if not that then close to it.
rd95stang 4 months ago
well of course a gto is gonna beat a v6 mustang, not even in the same engine class. come on get real
rd95stang 4 months ago
v6 mustangs=fail they will always be slow
arnoni11 4 months ago
@arnoni11 obviously u dont know the potential of a v6
atreyu2212 4 months ago 5
@atreyu2212 i got a v6...
arnoni11 4 months ago
@arnoni11 .....damn but i still gots the potential to a as fast as a gt if not more, there was a 500hp v6 on the cover of mustangs and fast fords
atreyu2212 4 months ago
That was the gayest bye bye i ever heard! No wonder why he didnt race you.
alittlespy 4 months ago 20
thats a beautiful mustang
shnto7 4 months ago
I hate when people try to race me in my Mustang. I own V6 for insurance reasons and I have no need to race cocky "V8" owners and all around assholes that honk at me and think that I'll just put my foot through the floor.
OneGuitarGuy 5 months ago
lol he wasnt even racing you idiot!
bloodgulch1 5 months ago
he just ignored u moron... that wasnt race ;s
SilentsStudio 5 months ago
lol doesnt the GTO have an LS v8 engine pumping out somthing around 400hp?
CemetaryGatesML 5 months ago
congratulations, you beat a stock V6...you might as well been racing a V6 anything.
Try racing a 2011 STOCK Mustang GT that does mid 12's in the 1/4 mile with stock tires and regular gas lol.
oh yeah, you won't post a video of that.
zoddie 5 months ago
@zoddie stock???? do you not clearly hear the turbo spool up on this thing? People need to understand the v6 isnt that great here... its just aiming for economy... A turbo 6 stang cant even take down a a bolt on mach 1....just shut up next time
Texarmageddon 5 months ago
Comment removed
sookyz 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Texarmageddon um, that all depends on what size turbo youre putting on? just slapping it with a label v6 turbo doesnt mean its going to be slow, just because the n/a form is.. with a small turbo, probably not, but you could probably slap a gt35 on it with some relatively inexpensive mods.. so saying that the car will never be fast is arrogant
sookyz 4 months ago
@Texarmageddon I think ignorant was the word you were looking for.... inexpensive shouldn't even be included.... anyhow.. just talking about a stang running near 6-10 psi.... a bolt mach 1 should beat that.
Texarmageddon 4 months ago
Those 4.0 V6s are garbage, I know i owned one.
blunts4dayzzz 6 months ago
the mustang did not have turbo
lovercarlin 6 months ago
@blackjacksmitty psh, youre telling me, i blew my stock tranny and stock 7.5, got a 8.8 out of a GT with some 3.73s in now, i like the look and sound of fords, but hot damn those LS engines are beasts, but yeah ill PM you and let you know, good luck with the GTO!
ADD8oi 6 months ago
@blackjacksmitty this summer i ran a best of 12.08 @ 117 on streets with NT555R rears, still need to invest in better suspension and slicks lol, have yet to use the nitrous kit this summer, the tuners at livernois were worried about the zex kit and the powerhouse turbo would be too much for a stock bottom end, but optimistically it should put down just shy of 500whp on a 3500lbs car, with driver, dont have funds for a bottom end anymore :(
ADD8oi 6 months ago
@blackjacksmitty 12psi, puts down 420 just about lol
ADD8oi 6 months ago
@blackjacksmitty you near the michigan area? im going to milan dragway next weekend, if you wanna meet up, powerhouse single turbo and a 100shot zex kit is what im running, whats all done to your gto?
ADD8oi 6 months ago
well i heard turbo spool, so he atleast gave the stang some pedal
playstationRLZ 6 months ago
Lol man it hardly looks as if he was really trying to race.
tredahardway 6 months ago
lol he goes and find v6 mustang because he is afraid of v8's :(
dlinegarcia60 6 months ago
@dlinegarcia60 6.0 GTO will run good against alot of the V-8's out there ;-)
6speedlover 6 months ago
@6speedlover of course a 6.0 will run against a stock v8...
dlinegarcia60 6 months ago
@dlinegarcia60 Then why did you say, he goes and finds a v6, because he is afraid of v8's ?
6speedlover 6 months ago
@6speedlover Does he indicate his is a 6.0? I highly doubt it is.
dlinegarcia60 6 months ago
It is also funny that they "raced" the mustang didnt even fully accelerate.... when he did he was right behind them.
dlinegarcia60 6 months ago
@6speedlover type in 04 GTO vs 07 Mustang GT (Round 2) .... watch that video please :) good day.
dlinegarcia60 6 months ago
@6speedlover His is most likely a 5.7....go watch 04 GTO vs 07 Mustang GT (round 2)
dlinegarcia60 6 months ago
@dlinegarcia60 First off (relax bro) I have a 6.0 gto, and i know that the Mustang GT and the goat are neck and neck. You need to calm down, and take a deep breathe. I've watched all the vids. and i dont care. I love my gto, but i highly respect the mustang. Win some, lose some ;-)
6speedlover 6 months ago
@6speedlover respect. and thats not you in your picture? haha
dlinegarcia60 6 months ago
with all do respect but you sounded like a looser who's dream was to win for just one time before dying..
redfireblast57 6 months ago
It REALLY didn't seem like he was racing, or racing very well. GTOs vs Mustang GT 4.6s are really even races, and a turbo v6 puts out more than a N/A GT and they're lighter...
ROWB0AT 6 months ago
@nsosa your a fucking vag. my v6 would wipe your shit.
MrDavisTheOneTheOnly 7 months ago
hahahaha! say bye bye! bye bye! It would be funnier if he was actually trying to race you
negrojenkins 7 months ago 37
A v6 mustang.. Wtf.. That's a girl car..
nsosa55 7 months ago
Man, i wish i knew where these people lived cuz i know that my v6 will run that GTO over. My 2.0L Neon will put it in place. Pontiac went out of business for a reason people. They Suckkkkk
Jordisonjunior44 7 months ago
I reace a mustang and i win but that mustang dosent know he race whit me =)
xender891 7 months ago
Ah, you idiot boys, this is a damn V6...I scrape GTO's in my 2011 GT 5.0 V8...
xXxiTzCoNoRxXx 8 months ago
@xXxiTzCoNoRxXx No shit!? Oh my god! I never would have thought in a million years a newer more powerful V8 with a lighter body could beat an older V8 with a heavier body! No way!
cutsautoam 8 months ago
@cutsautoam Someones a Pontiac fanboy. Someones also a little smartass.
xXxiTzCoNoRxXx 8 months ago
@xXxiTzCoNoRxXx not everyone has money for a fancy 2011 5.0 ass
atreyu2212 4 months ago
it wasnt racing you. you are just a ricer whos mommy and daddy could afford a V8.,
meifert2 9 months ago
Ugh *thumbs down* You're suppose to have the turbo boosted up BEFORE you go. That's how it works.
todd987 9 months ago
Wow lame video he didnt even try to race you pussies
cgarlow90 10 months ago
I have a bone-stock v6 mustang, and, speaking purely from experience, that was not a race. That 'stang wasn't even accelerating. Nice try, though. I guess that's why GTOs no longer exist while Mustangs are still running strong.
BrachiateCub 1 year ago
This is a curious outcome, I honestly thought a turbo V6 would do a lot better.
xJTF2x 1 year ago
agreed ! i guess the problem I had was a stock gto putting 10 cars on a turbo mustang as shown in the video , it s just not gonna happen .
graborangemus 1 year ago
definitely not a turbo , or not racing , I have a vortech and stock gto's can't hang , modded is a different story , ls1's are a beast . but stock is not gonna beat a turbo car , they are running anywhere between mid 12's and high 11's
graborangemus 1 year ago
man where are the races when i got out lol wtf... good run weak stang.. sux cause i own one :(
forcefedhatch 1 year ago
plus check out youtube user Roadhawg2 for his v6 stang vs gto. at a track with times so its legit.
ckdspickard 1 year ago
not buying into this. I can believe its a v6 mustang though but until I see whats under the hood of the mustang Im gonna call BS on the turbo
ckdspickard 1 year ago
4.0 junk motor with a turbo.
erdaylike24se7en 1 year ago
@erdaylike24se7en 4.0 junk indeed worst v6 ford made in mustangs :/
Kyrazlan 1 year ago
haha, my mustang would smoke your gto without a problem.
IcemanICX220 1 year ago
dont hate on v6's lol. i doubt that one had a turbo though...if it did it was a weak ass turbo
sterlinghighschool 1 year ago
if that stang had a turbo it would have smoked the gto.
isthoed 1 year ago
yeah tht mustang wasnt racing at all lol. ive scraped on the gto's in my 2006 v6 supercharged mustang at only 6 psi. then again it was from a dead start too...not a 60-70 mph roll lol
cojakc 1 year ago 5
Ah, mustang boys...mustangs just can't be outran can they?@cojakc
mattwhiteyanks1 1 year ago
@mattwhiteyanks1 I dont understand why there are so many LS vs V6 mustang (turbo or not) videos. Of course a LS1 or LS2 is gonna beat a friggin pre 2011 Mustang V6, i dont care if it has a turbo. Its a 4 Liter iron piece of shit! Now you throw a turbo on the 2011 Mustang V6, and thats another story....That race I'd actually give props to a stock LS1 for soundly beating! Keep in mind though a 06 GTO can keep up with a brand new SS or 5.0. Basically its like you beat up a retard in this video
Punisher7121 1 year ago
@mattwhiteyanks1 So True
radd2983 1 year ago
@mattwhiteyanks1 No they cant...
SpeechComm05Z 1 year ago
@mattwhiteyanks1 he had a turbo in that and yet when he "Raced" you i didnt hear a whine. must be a very very very hi-tech turbo. this kid is obviously happy he passed a mustang on a highway.
8xxABHIxx8 9 months ago
@mattwhiteyanks1 lol troll..
valflyinf 8 months ago
@mattwhiteyanks1 lmao, not a turbo car, ill stomp your little goat into the ground with my turbo 6 :)
ADD8oi 6 months ago
@mattwhiteyanks1 its easy to win a one person race. I mean you could beat a bugatti if their not racing either.
NKBLAZER 6 months ago
Comment removed
wolf1010 5 months ago
@cojakc
with how much nitrous?
gconnoyer 1 year ago
@gconnoyer none
cojakc 1 year ago
@cojakc lol so instead of 200hp you were puttin out 240-260 lol still wouldnt beat the goat
bigradke17 1 year ago
@bigradke17 lol no more like 390 at the wheels if its a turbo car . more then enough to crush a (stock) gto
graborangemus 1 year ago
@graborangemus if it has more than a turbo then yea but with just a turbo sorry you arent going to gain 200rwhp from just a turbo now if it has supporting mods then yea easly and 390rwhp will smoke a semi worked gto prob be a good race for mine to be honest im 435rwhp
bigradke17 1 year ago
@bigradke17 yes your right , with basic bolt on s and turbo several are putting down 370-390 / how ever just the turbo and tune will get ya 340+
the gto that year was 333 . and and weighed 349 #s more . so it still wouldn't win
graborangemus 1 year ago
@graborangemus yea but it would be close with the top end edge eventually going to the gto
bigradke17 1 year ago
@
hmmm i really don't see this happening! even from a dig those GTO got the advantage! They are heavy but hey also have a big ole 6 liter v8 lol
And from a roll the GTO would kill....they have good top end power!
If you had a v8 S/C id believe ya
Roush20115XR 11 months ago
@cojakc thats crap. your lookin at a 400hp/400tq gto vs a 210hp/240tq mustang, stock. you say you smoked gtos in your supercharged 6psi stang? Xcharger is probably one of the best brands out there for the supercharged v6 stangs and the new intercooled xchargers people running 13psi are still only getting 340-350hp to the wheels(not counting all the supporting mods), a gto makes more than that stock. i have a 2005 ls2 m6 gto. i have $100 in my pocket saying i smoke your stang.
RBCantrell727 11 months ago
@RBCantrell727 the GTO makes 400hp/400tq at the crank , it would b a great race for a stock Gto vs a F.I. of any kind v6 mustang , now modified Gto would b a different story
graborangemus 11 months ago
@graborangemus and like i said. the intercooled xcharger running 13psi of boost still makes 330-350ish rwhp depending all the other mods you put into it. a gto is 355hp/365tq stock rwhp. f.i. vs.all motor? but the point of my comment was dude up there said he has "scraped on the gto's... at only 6 psi." i was calling bullshit. im not hating on the mustangs, my first car was a 2005 v6 5speed. im just stating numbers and facts from experience and research when i had my stang.
RBCantrell727 11 months ago
@RBCantrell727
oh Im not hating either , I almost purchased a 2004 Gto , and no I don't think 6 psi would b an ass whooping , but it would b a good race due to the lighter mustang . the gto is probably losing a little more then 45 hp at the wheels , id say more like 60 . most dyno charts I see for it puts it in the 330-345 range , but the gto has a much bigger platform with regards to performance , a couple of bolt ons and you got a rocket
graborangemus 11 months ago
@graborangemus i've never personally had mine dynoed, but every single "bone stock ls2 gto" dyno i've seen on youtube says 355hp/365tq to the wheels. STILL main point is saying 6psi v6 mustang wouldnt come anywhere close to a stock ls2 gto.
RBCantrell727 11 months ago
@RBCantrell727
its definitely losing at least 60 to the wheels , search gto forums . 15-20% loss to the wheels 60-80 horse power loss , so now your talking 320-340 horsepower range / 6#s will get you at least 300 on the mustang / now factor in the 346 extra pounds the gto is carrying , quarter mile times for gto is 13.4- 13.7 / 6#s 13.5- 13.9 that s kind of close
graborangemus 11 months ago
@graborangemus 6psi might get you 300 to the crank but not the wheels. i have done my research on it when i had my stang and xchargers which is the best v6 supercharger for the stang gives it 275ish to the wheels at 8-9psi (based on memory, too lazy to search it again) and 9 psi making 275 to the wheels is a little over 100rwhp gain. and i know for facts from research intercooled xchargers at 13.5 psi is giving to 340-350 to the wheels (read that on forums) at !13.5! psi. A LOOOT more than 6 psi
RBCantrell727 11 months ago
@RBCantrell727
guess my memory isn't as good as it used to b !! went and looked at archives , best 6 #s with custom tune was 270 at the wheels / best quarter was 13.8 , I guess the only disagreement have with ya now is the x charger being the best , as I have a Vortech ! id challenge an x anytime
graborangemus 11 months ago
@graborangemus well from forums and people trying stuff i heard all good from both brands. idk much about vortechs and how they work, i know they are like a belt driven turbo/ turbo style lookin supercharger kinda deal. making less low end power vs the belt driven intake manifold style xcharger. but like i said i dont know much about vortech so your welcome to correct the crap outa me lol.
RBCantrell727 11 months ago
@RBCantrell727
ha ha ha yes its a centrifugal superchager , like a turbo but belt driven , it has a linear boost curve , the more rmps , the more boost it makes , im pushing 13 #s with a pretty safe tune , 11.8 a/f ratio . the x is more popular I think for ease of installation , sound , and look . but its pricey . the fastest x I know of is a 12.6 car , fastest Vortech is 11.0 , with out a built motor of coarse, there is a 2005 4.0 Vortech race car running 10's but lots done to it
graborangemus 11 months ago
@cojakc just curious what number you put down? i mean even with a s/c a v6 stang is only puttin down like 230-240rwhp
bigradke17 9 months ago
wow he would of kicked yalls ass if he knew he was acing
ekkvj 1 year ago
@ekkvj are you all oblivious to the fact that a well built Turbo v6 still isn't gonna usually see over 380 horse? As where the goats are 400 on HP and TQ stock.
mattwhiteyanks1 1 year ago
no offense... but there is no way that mustang was actually racing.. i didn't hear a downshift. I did hear the turbo but it was obviously a rear mount and if he had downshifted you would have heard the whistle a LOT louder, and a V6 mustang turbo will run, at the very least, a 12.5 or faster, and a completely stock 05 gto will run a high 13 to maybe 13.5's... sorry facts speak for themselves.
probercr93 1 year ago
@probercr93 didn't hear a downshift...aka you don't have speakers or you don't know what type of sound a downshift would make.
mattwhiteyanks1 1 year ago
@mattwhiteyanks1 lol... you obviously know nothing about cars... a well built turbo v6 can be well over 700 whp... a non built turbo v6 can be in the neighborhood of 400 whp... that is horsepower to the wheels... your 400 hp is horsepower to the crank, you'd be lucky to see 340 to the wheels, plus the fact that your gto weighs about 3800 lbs where as the v6 mustang weighs about 3400... a huge differance... and I have amazing speakers and I know what a downshift sounds like... watch my videos...
probercr93 1 year ago
@probercr93 700 HP daily driver mustang driven by a 17 year old....realistically ...how often do you see that? Does this video have the title fully built mustang at 20 psi vs GTO? Sure, they're are much cater cars than mine, Just not this one
mattwhiteyanks1 1 year ago
@mattwhiteyanks1 I wasn't saying that this one is a 700hp car, but you said a well built turbo v6 was 380 hp, I was just stateing that a well built V6 is capable of 700whp. this one is probably near 400whp, where as your car is 400 crank hp which is about 340whp, plus his car is lighter. don't get me wrong I think the 6.0L gto's are pretty cool cars, and built are amazing. but there is no way this guy was really racing and you pulled that hard. you might pull like that on a non turbo car though
probercr93 1 year ago
@probercr93 he said he was around 320 HP. It was a Turbo car. He did try to race. Was it a great running car at the time, no. Obviously not. He's added a few things and increased boost since last run. Ill see if we can set up another run soon.
mattwhiteyanks1 1 year ago
@probercr93 dude...the V6 stang puts down 210BHP...you rlly expected the turbo kit to increase him to 460BHP(which translates to 400whp...that is fucking ridiculous to even think, pull your head outta the clouds kid, your sounding like a ricer. Get ur numbers right.
GTO19020 1 year ago
@GTO19020 actually, how about you research before you post... Yes I do expect a turbo to make that much of a differance... try this... look up "turbo v6 mustang" and you'll find plenty of dyno runs with pretty much all of them being over 400whp... and all that on the STOCK bottom end. I'm far from a ricer. I do own and race 2 turbocharged vehicles one of which being a mustang, however it is a V8... I am far from a kid... but nice try... please do your homework before commenting @ me... thanks
probercr93 1 year ago
@probercr93 a turbo with hellaa boost to make 400rwhp with no forged internals? i know another guy went the same route and blew his motor within the first week. definitely should invest in forged internals to push tht much power from the v6
cojakc 1 year ago
@cojakc not to mention the stock 7 inch rear end can safely withstand bout 300+ a lil rwhp, with the gt rear end and maybe some gears, youll pull harder and safely support more power with a lil peace of mind
cojakc 1 year ago
@cojakc you're looking at around 13lbs of boost for around 400whp and of course you would want to build the bottom end for longevity... but I know of plenty of people making that kind of power for over 2 years on the stock bottom end... and tuning is a def. must.
probercr93 1 year ago
@probercr93 fail for a second time...and maybe you didnt just watch the vid and clearly the turbo began to spool....i know u think a turbo is a be all and end all, but its not *cough*ricer*cough* and yeah, built with new heads, intake, exhaust, cam, shorties, ect im sure one could lay down 400hp...but not stock...dude, i owned a 06 V6 stang (check my vids)...do you have any ideas what kind of weak cam and heads are on that thing? Time for YOU to do some research lol
GTO19020 1 year ago
@GTO19020 obviously you don't even know what a "ricer" is. Furthermore you don't want a big cam with a "blown" car, the overlap just allows the boost to go out the exhaust, so the cam in the v6 is just fine, you do not need an "intake" because that would come with the turbo kit. You do NOT need shorties the exhaust manifolds would flow just fine for a turbo car. Granted heads would make a differance, but you don't need them to make 400whp. And a "built" motor isn't what you just stated.
probercr93 1 year ago
@GTO19020 Those are bolt ons, with the exception of maybe the heads... however a built motor is when you put take the motor apart and build the bottom end to take more power... but the 4.0 doesn't need that to achieve 400whp... I'm sorry my friend again you have failed to prove your point... and if you watch my videos I OWN a 2005 mustang GT turbocharged... when you get the knowhow and can afford any of this... then come talk... otherwise you're obviously out of your league...
probercr93 1 year ago
@probercr93 lol clearly your someone with more cash than intelligence, but yeah, not GT...good job on boosting an aluminum block never meant for forced induction, when you blow your rods, ill most likely simply point and laugh at you, and can afford? excuse me, i drive a 05 GTO...ya know, that car with a bigger motor and much better interior than your rustang. btw a new GTO is about 5K more than your rustang and stock for stock would slap it around like a cheap bitch, dont lecture me about
GTO19020 1 year ago
@GTO19020 finance, when my car is worth more than your cheap soccer mom mobile. (god i only see about 20 Rustangs a day) its called an IRS, maybe your rustang should try it sometime. and the shaker series, sounds like shit XD In case your wondering my profession, its Mech. Engineer...ya know, that thing you would never in a million years have the intelligence to do, next time, watch who you mouth off to kid.
GTO19020 1 year ago
@GTO19020 lol... I just checked KBB and both our cars @ 46000 miles (how much my car has) and both cars with the same options, my cars private party value is $17,100 and your car is $16,700. So what does that mean? Your car depresiates faster than mine? Because nobody wants it? I guess... but anyway, I'm going to take this to your message box and disprove the rest of your theorys there because I'm sure this guy doesn't want to see anymore negative posts on his video... thanks
probercr93 1 year ago
@probercr93 omg man, you did message me and i shut you down, like the previous comment you left, dont message me and comment back, i dont think i cant handle all your clever arguements and quick witted responses (sarcasm) =)
GTO19020 1 year ago
@GTO19020 I love GTO's for performance, but I could never buy one...They look like bloated Cavaliers! Not a GM hater, in fact I owned a 95 TA and 02 Z28 before my 2011 V6 Mustang. I seem to be in the minority of people that like both Ford and GM...I just dislike Dodge, making overpriced cars that are slowed down by a ton of weight! But I can understand people not liking Ford before 2011....I wouldnt have touched a Mustang before now
Punisher7121 1 year ago
Something sounded alot like a supercharger at the very beginning of the video. Those 4.0 V6's are slow as hell too, even with a turbo.. and those GTO's are just badass to begin with. nice video. check out my page and please subscribe!
NelsonSavage 1 year ago
NEVER HEARD THE STANG GET ON IT. Someone didnt know they were racing
THEENFORCER34 1 year ago
I'm sure you're right...I mean, with his downshift to build rpms as well as boost and the nod of his head when i said, "going on three"...those were all quinky dinks I suppose
mattwhiteyanks1 1 year ago
if that mustang had a turbo, it was a pos.
phatrides222000 1 year ago