Nick Schou, OC Weekly reporter, lies about 9/11 evidence

[SpedKennedys]

oc weekly and the oc register are hanging off rick warren's snot bags! most of orange county is. Fuck those fuckers!

[felicity5150]

As America gets raped by the criminals running their government maybe the stupid sheep will wake up from their phony dream. That $5T (not $700B) bailout bill was not a bailout, but will be used to give to banks so they can acquire other banks. They stole money from you in broad day light. It was a scam you stupid assholes just like 9/11 which was a government false flag op. You dumb shits deserve to go down with the ship.

[siviousinferno]

okay get over here to america since you're soooo smart and convince the world that 9/11 was a government setup.

so will you do it? probably not...talk is cheap, kid. Anyone else up for the challenge? Convince an entire country that 9/11 was a government setup having just a plane ticket and cash with no evidence?

Didn't think so

[rushfan9thcmd]

@siviousinferno actually, I'm waiting for some real scientists to come forward and disprove Prof. Harrit and Prof. Jones report published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal of April 2009 about the physical evidence of unreacted thermite in the dust. The physical evidence exists and should be easy to do tests to confirm that the study they put forth is crap. Yet no scientist has guts to attempt to disprove the reality that the material exists and is what it is claimed to be. I'll wait........

[CokeSupply]

@siviousinferno A lot of you guys are already convinced. Instead of asking foreigners to come to your shores and do your research for you, get off your ass and fucking do it yourself, you ignorant fucker.

[felicity5150]

Let the lemmings continue to live their lie. CIT did the right thing to expose the 9/11 false flag. Good for them. Meanwhile the rest of America remains asleep. They do not want to wake up from their fairy tale.

[misscurli]

Nick Schou doesn't lie, he's just too levelheaded to believe your little conspiracy

[Markennz]

Actually "levelheadedness" would lead you to believe that the evidence that they provide is logical and factual.

[bileduct76]

Where's the logic when just about all of CIT's witnesses said they saw the plane impact with the Pentagon, were in a position to see a plane impact with the Pentagon, and noone saw David Copperfield in town that day?

Craig's work debunks itself.

[Markennz]

Well to be honest I've never even seen the movie this guy is referring to I was just talking smack. But I have seen a lot of logical evidence from many sources that completely contradict the "official story" of 9/11 and that's something you can't deny well if you know what I'm referring to anyways.

[xdayxdreamer]

i hope u realize how stupid u sound

[SpedKennedys]

calling someone stupid makes YOU look stupid. yer mamma should've told ya.

[greatngood]

Thanks Craig and Aldo for your very important work.

[lannijolie]

ditto :)

[facilitatetruth]

In a 5-page article such as CIT's feature in the OC Weekly, Nick Schou truly has no excuse to not mention all of the north side evidence. It is obvious that he purposely omitted most of the evidence and purposely misspelled "Citizen Investigation Team" and "Sgt. Legasse." His front-page article passed through editors and several drafts and they still didn't catch this? There are no other spelling or grammar mistakes. In fact, he even puts includes "[sic]" pointing out others' spelling errors.

[bileduct76]

Wow, you've sure uncovered a smoking gun there!

9/11 was an inside job because a few spelling mistakes worked their way past the editor of the OC Weekly!

[facilitatetruth]

You don't accidentally and consistently misspell the name of your subject for a front-page feature story. He omitted 11 witnesses, and misspelled literally 1/2 the names of the witnesses he did report on. But that doesn't prove 9/11 was an inside job, and I no one claims that it does, which you know. What proves 9/11 was an inside job is the 13 North side witnesses and Roosevelt Roberts, the C-130 flight path, 84 RADES data, Steve Chaconas, the damage itself, the FDR, etc. Do some research.

[bileduct76]

I've researched this more than you think. CIT's representation of the C-130's flight path is FRAUDULENT.

How many of CIT's NoC witnesses said they saw the plane impact with the building?

How do you explain Sean Boger's account of watching the plane fully enter the building.

Remember, according to Craig, Sean's testimony supports a flyover.

CIT are FRAUDS.

[facilitatetruth]

Explain why the C-130 path is fraudulent or don't make that claim. The claim of seeing the plane impact the building is mutually exclusive with the claim of the north side flight path. All witnesses, when pressed on the issue vehemently defend their flight path. The nature of this claim (right or left) is also impossible to get wrong. On the contrary, when pressed about actually seeing the impact, witnesses, INCLUDING Sean Boger admit it's at least possible they didn't see the plane impact.