Would be nice if they went to the top of the cell at some point. Don't understand why they won't do that any more since they've done equally or more dangerous stunts recently in matches such as MITB or the Hardy/Punk TLC match. Personally the blood thing doesn't bother me though, it looked fake anyway (and yes I know it was real blood but it was always the same coming down from the forehead which didn't usually make much sense in context).
I think the reason why they don't go to the top anymore is because with the new restructured HIC the cage is huge and if someone fell off from there, it could potentially kill them.
Heh. They did. Remember Cena vs. JBL at One Night Stand 2008? Cena had JBL in the STF and JBL had to like chew a blood capsule or whatever and spit up the so called "blood". Pathetic.
Yeah I had that game. I thought it was still fun regardless of the absence of blood, because if you compare the Hell in a Cells in the Gamecube WWE games and the PS2/PS3 WWE games...well...you probably already know my answer.
No, actually, the PS2 WWE games were half-ass decent.
Now, the PS1 game, Smackdown 2: Know Your Role. Now THAT was a HIAC ripoff. Honestly, it didn't even surround the ringside area! it was more like a cage match with a roof!
No dude, I meant the Gamecube Hell in a Cells were better, ie; WrestleMania X8, XIX and Day of Reckoning 1 and 2. The Hell in a Cell was actually scaled correctly and had 4 breakaway spots on the roof and when you fell through the roof, you ACTUALLY fell through the roof. Plus you could destroy the walls of the cell and do an aerial attck from the roof down to the ring and other shit there.
The only thing about Wrestlemania X8 that was even remotely fun was the table physics. Tables didn't have their own animations, and so you could do the same table spots that you saw in those classic TLC matches between the Hardies, the Dudleys, and E&C, just with only four wrestlers, not six.
Yeah. You could actually superplex your opponent off of a ladder through a table of two. And they had a bigger weapon selection than the PS2 WWE games.
Anyone who defends PG in WWE hasn't paid attention to it as of late. There constantly showing sexual Innuendo on there shows. Ziggler and Maria in a closet anyone? Or Todd Grisham making weirdo little off handed comments back to JR.
Tslay..sorry actualy joshua,how fucking dare you insult the people who ''BITCH'' about the pg rating as if they dont have an opinion,have you ever ran a promotion??no didnt think so,your a couch potato who watches wrestling you VIRGIN CREEPY CUNT,wrestling jesus,spinnernet,astone,pwr report,there all good,just not you..VIRGIN,haha i pity you but hate you more
Well the blood could make the match more emotional and dramatic and focus on how "brutal" the match is. It might even get people to rate the match higher.
Taker/Edge was a great match, but something was missing which I think was blood. It seemed just like a regular no holds barred/no DQ match with a cage happening to be around the ring. For HIAC to seem truly brutal I'd think blood would do it.
i'm going to the PPV. i've always wanted to see a HIAC match live so i'm not complaining that i gonna get to see 3, but this PPV kills the HIAC concept for me. cena/orton, its ok but it should be HHH/orton in the cell to end the mcmahon family storyline. DX/Legacy, eh. taker/punk, its only their 2nd match so no. PG or not at least 1 definitely needs blood or the whole point of HIAC gets killed even more. no way out i'm on the fence about 2 ECs, but this & TLC soon - enough with the themed PPVs!
People forget that Undertaker/Edge was one of the greatest cell matches, and that was a month after WWE went PG. There was blood in that, though they were bloodied the hard way and not through a blading.
the way the hell in a cell ppv is going to be sucessful is if the hell in the cell matches are booked creatively and have some spots that haven't been seen before. the problem is there is only so many things you spots you can come up with in a hell in a cell match. these ppv themes now are starting to remind of wcw in 2001 when started changing the names of the ppvs. they already sent a survey asking the fans their thoughts on a elimination chamber ppv
i think this pg crap will ruin the cell matches and many more matches to come in the future unless a lot of smoke and mirrors are used to compensate for no blood etc.
TSlay, I would remind you that last year's Hell in a Cell between Undertaker and Edge featured no blood. In your review of the SummerSlam 2008 show, you rated it ****3/4, saying it nearly topped Ric Flair vs. Shawn Michaels as your best match of the year. So just because there might not be blood doesn't automatically mean "bad match", especially judging from your reviews in the past.
Taker cut his forearm when they plowed thru the section of the cage, I thought I saw a small nick on Edge's back too could have just been a mark from where something nailed him tho
No but having 3 matches is the problem. You are going to have three HIAC. Now one of them is a Tag match so that will be diffrent but its going to be hard to do the other two with out them feeling the same was more of my point.
I salute you Tslayer, you made a video bashing on TNA then turned around and did one on WWE. You are a fair man, that is more than most are around here.
have to sa that i agree. plus why would wwe put the hell in a cell as a ppv name now you know the ending of feuds and the climaxeswill end here so you ccan now predict when you will see the feud end and another begin. also the nastalga of the elimination chamber and the hell in a cell are now gone,man i just wshake my heads at wwe
Is there any chance you could shoot the video so your face isn't sideways? Besides that keep up the good work. Enjoy hearing your opinion even if I disagree with you at times.
It's sad there probably won't be any blood on this show because I think Punk could really benefit from bleeding in this match. To have him get totally annihilated and bleed buckets only to dig down and beat Taker would really make him I think.
Nothing wrong with a hell in a cell with no blood but when you have three hell in the cells with no blood then I agree it's just a dumb idea. Having three HIAC in a PPV is dumb to begin with IMO.
EVERY Hell in the Cell has been nothing but a bloody beat down with the 2 wrestlers absolutely annihilating each other. yes it wasn't ALL about the blood but the blood did definitely help the "Hell in the Cell" live up to its name.
and yes i agree they shouldnt have the hell in the cell especially when they have something like No Way Out in the beginning of the year.
I hate overgimmicking a PPV just for the sake of doing it. The best way to sell a PPV is with strong storylines involving compelling characters. By doing a PPV with all Cage Matches (TNA I'm looking at you), all Submission, all Extreme Rules, or HIACs, you are basically telling me that you aren't creative.
I agree 100%,all the gimmick ppvs are really stupid,like we have HIAC,then Bragging Rights (internet voting) then its Survivor Series time but then we have TLC,WWE now have 7 gimmick ppvs which is crazy
I remember saying back in 2005 that Lockdown was a stupid idea, and here we are 4 years later and WWE is on a pace to make sure all their B PPVs are named after a gimmick match.
Good Writing & Strong Characters sell....not gimmicks.
I didn't enjoy that match at all, and I don't think having blood would have helped it any. HIAC kinda feels stale now. I mean, I keep waiting for the next Foley moment, but when nothing close to that happens, the match feels like a let down.
Yes but you are going to have THREE even if it was 2, given one is a tag match, it would have been fine but I can't see doing three and NONE with out blood.
Hell In A Cell with no blood = isnt going to work UNLESS they actually put some thought into these matches,we might see the first ever Hell In A Cell match with actually wrestling.
yeah thats not going to work,the crowd will be dead,surely they can have a little spot of blood atleast in the DX match?
The wwe is now becoming tv-y7 nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
TheHL09 2 years ago
are you serious? that's going to far.
ststriker 2 years ago
No but the way creative team is writing it might as well be.
TheHL09 2 years ago
Would be nice if they went to the top of the cell at some point. Don't understand why they won't do that any more since they've done equally or more dangerous stunts recently in matches such as MITB or the Hardy/Punk TLC match. Personally the blood thing doesn't bother me though, it looked fake anyway (and yes I know it was real blood but it was always the same coming down from the forehead which didn't usually make much sense in context).
GuyTM 2 years ago
I think the reason why they don't go to the top anymore is because with the new restructured HIC the cage is huge and if someone fell off from there, it could potentially kill them.
ststriker 2 years ago
you can try renting PC's like i do. but i hope you'd be able to try getting a laptop on downpayment basis (i've been looking for one myself)
kapengmabula 2 years ago
anyone can help me remebering when the last wwe matches were in which the wrestlers bladed? i dont want to joke about it i really cant remeber =) thx
tabeasnight 2 years ago
creepy.
Ratmann3684 2 years ago
Hell in a Cell, no blood?
Why don't you have a First Blood match with no blood?
dstebbin 2 years ago
Heh. They did. Remember Cena vs. JBL at One Night Stand 2008? Cena had JBL in the STF and JBL had to like chew a blood capsule or whatever and spit up the so called "blood". Pathetic.
hbk2467y2j 2 years ago
Still, though, there was juice.
But this upcoming October PPV is looking to be about as clean as WWE Wrestlemania X8 for the Gamecube (meaning it had HIAC, but no blood).
dstebbin 2 years ago
Yeah I had that game. I thought it was still fun regardless of the absence of blood, because if you compare the Hell in a Cells in the Gamecube WWE games and the PS2/PS3 WWE games...well...you probably already know my answer.
hbk2467y2j 2 years ago
No, actually, the PS2 WWE games were half-ass decent.
Now, the PS1 game, Smackdown 2: Know Your Role. Now THAT was a HIAC ripoff. Honestly, it didn't even surround the ringside area! it was more like a cage match with a roof!
dstebbin 2 years ago
No dude, I meant the Gamecube Hell in a Cells were better, ie; WrestleMania X8, XIX and Day of Reckoning 1 and 2. The Hell in a Cell was actually scaled correctly and had 4 breakaway spots on the roof and when you fell through the roof, you ACTUALLY fell through the roof. Plus you could destroy the walls of the cell and do an aerial attck from the roof down to the ring and other shit there.
hbk2467y2j 2 years ago
The only thing about Wrestlemania X8 that was even remotely fun was the table physics. Tables didn't have their own animations, and so you could do the same table spots that you saw in those classic TLC matches between the Hardies, the Dudleys, and E&C, just with only four wrestlers, not six.
That's about it for WM18.
dstebbin 2 years ago
Yeah. You could actually superplex your opponent off of a ladder through a table of two. And they had a bigger weapon selection than the PS2 WWE games.
hbk2467y2j 2 years ago
Anyone who defends PG in WWE hasn't paid attention to it as of late. There constantly showing sexual Innuendo on there shows. Ziggler and Maria in a closet anyone? Or Todd Grisham making weirdo little off handed comments back to JR.
jmg3116 2 years ago
Hey jmg. Thanks. We havent been watching WWE of late.
From what you said its sounding prety gay.
Spamfrwdchainkiller 2 years ago
Tslay..sorry actualy joshua,how fucking dare you insult the people who ''BITCH'' about the pg rating as if they dont have an opinion,have you ever ran a promotion??no didnt think so,your a couch potato who watches wrestling you VIRGIN CREEPY CUNT,wrestling jesus,spinnernet,astone,pwr report,there all good,just not you..VIRGIN,haha i pity you but hate you more
Johnbuk12345 2 years ago
Comment removed
Johnbuk12345 2 years ago
tslay has gone insane
rossbain123 2 years ago
hell in a cell does not need blood mandkind and undertaker didn't have blood and i thought that was a good match
njdevilsfan 2 years ago
themed ppv's have to go
17bigt 2 years ago
you dont REALLY need blood to make a good HIAC match
Think of all the hell in a cell matches that have happened and take away the blood
Does that make the match less awseome ?
Course not....
McCannMan35 2 years ago
Well the blood could make the match more emotional and dramatic and focus on how "brutal" the match is. It might even get people to rate the match higher.
AmericanNohbuddy 2 years ago
You make a good point
However as you pointed out the Taker vs Edge match featured little to no blood
And it was still an amazing match
Some people think the blood is vital in HIAC
No its the story telling,athleticism and characters that make the match
McCannMan35 2 years ago
right on brother.
Ratmann3684 2 years ago
Taker/Edge was a great match, but something was missing which I think was blood. It seemed just like a regular no holds barred/no DQ match with a cage happening to be around the ring. For HIAC to seem truly brutal I'd think blood would do it.
AmericanNohbuddy 2 years ago
i'm going to the PPV. i've always wanted to see a HIAC match live so i'm not complaining that i gonna get to see 3, but this PPV kills the HIAC concept for me. cena/orton, its ok but it should be HHH/orton in the cell to end the mcmahon family storyline. DX/Legacy, eh. taker/punk, its only their 2nd match so no. PG or not at least 1 definitely needs blood or the whole point of HIAC gets killed even more. no way out i'm on the fence about 2 ECs, but this & TLC soon - enough with the themed PPVs!
LLtv3 2 years ago
People forget that Undertaker/Edge was one of the greatest cell matches, and that was a month after WWE went PG. There was blood in that, though they were bloodied the hard way and not through a blading.
deminstius 2 years ago
Neither Undertaker or Edge bled. The only blood was when Undertaker knocked edge through the cell and his arm was cut. That was it.
AmericanNohbuddy 2 years ago
the way the hell in a cell ppv is going to be sucessful is if the hell in the cell matches are booked creatively and have some spots that haven't been seen before. the problem is there is only so many things you spots you can come up with in a hell in a cell match. these ppv themes now are starting to remind of wcw in 2001 when started changing the names of the ppvs. they already sent a survey asking the fans their thoughts on a elimination chamber ppv
wwefanjl2000 2 years ago
i think this pg crap will ruin the cell matches and many more matches to come in the future unless a lot of smoke and mirrors are used to compensate for no blood etc.
ivano1987 2 years ago
i agree with tslayer, lack of blood will hurt the credibility of the match
englishCAWwrestling 2 years ago
I like these short vids... its strait to the point...
also you should try holding the phone is a different way before we can see you verticale.... If you can.
mathal07 2 years ago
If I do that then it cuts off most of my face or you can't hear me well..still playing around with it though.
TSlay1974 2 years ago
TSlay, I would remind you that last year's Hell in a Cell between Undertaker and Edge featured no blood. In your review of the SummerSlam 2008 show, you rated it ****3/4, saying it nearly topped Ric Flair vs. Shawn Michaels as your best match of the year. So just because there might not be blood doesn't automatically mean "bad match", especially judging from your reviews in the past.
TheKSE1990 2 years ago
there was a little blood in the Summerslam Match it was mentioned but not made a big deal out of
gamecockdevil4 2 years ago
really? When was this?
Kuratras 2 years ago
Taker cut his forearm when they plowed thru the section of the cage, I thought I saw a small nick on Edge's back too could have just been a mark from where something nailed him tho
gamecockdevil4 2 years ago
No but having 3 matches is the problem. You are going to have three HIAC. Now one of them is a Tag match so that will be diffrent but its going to be hard to do the other two with out them feeling the same was more of my point.
TSlay1974 2 years ago
I salute you Tslayer, you made a video bashing on TNA then turned around and did one on WWE. You are a fair man, that is more than most are around here.
Tucanforpres001 2 years ago
have to sa that i agree. plus why would wwe put the hell in a cell as a ppv name now you know the ending of feuds and the climaxeswill end here so you ccan now predict when you will see the feud end and another begin. also the nastalga of the elimination chamber and the hell in a cell are now gone,man i just wshake my heads at wwe
danandli 2 years ago
WWE has offically turned for kids and for women and little girls and for grown men who are faggots.
24varner 2 years ago
Is there any chance you could shoot the video so your face isn't sideways? Besides that keep up the good work. Enjoy hearing your opinion even if I disagree with you at times.
demomanTNA 2 years ago
i ave not heard of this no blood thing going to happen at HIAC but now that makes me just mad
mikeMazzacre 2 years ago
what do you do for a living, tlsay?
tmzson 2 years ago
It's sad there probably won't be any blood on this show because I think Punk could really benefit from bleeding in this match. To have him get totally annihilated and bleed buckets only to dig down and beat Taker would really make him I think.
Cuda123087 2 years ago
That's why I hate the WWE, they treat their PPV's like crap.Last year there was only 2 weeks between Judgement Day and One Night Stand.WTF is that?
TeamExtremeMember8 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1 stared this video.
Either get a new computer or dont make the fucken videos you god damned faggot
ToothSIayer 2 years ago
you would have one stared it anyways.
TSlay1974 2 years ago
nah, I actually liked you before you bitched like a 7 year old girl about spinnernet. My real account is still subscribed to you.
I might have gave it a 2/5
ToothSIayer 2 years ago
not if your not into it man, you have always been nice to me. Thank you i feel bad bothering you. Have a good night man
gemni686 2 years ago
This is like the only video he has ever made like this you dumbass.
KingBurkey 2 years ago
STFU Morning Peacock. Its like his third.
You fail x3
ToothSIayer 2 years ago
HIAC with no blood=Epic fail
civilwarfare101 2 years ago
Nothing wrong with a hell in a cell with no blood but when you have three hell in the cells with no blood then I agree it's just a dumb idea. Having three HIAC in a PPV is dumb to begin with IMO.
smeefan 2 years ago
Having a ppv based on a hell in a cell match is a dumb idea. IMO.
civilwarfare101 2 years ago
EVERY Hell in the Cell has been nothing but a bloody beat down with the 2 wrestlers absolutely annihilating each other. yes it wasn't ALL about the blood but the blood did definitely help the "Hell in the Cell" live up to its name.
and yes i agree they shouldnt have the hell in the cell especially when they have something like No Way Out in the beginning of the year.
its177 2 years ago
I actually can't remember if Edge vs Taker at Summerslam last year had any blood in it.
SoulOfRuby 2 years ago
No. Edge vs. Taker last year at HIAC match at Summerslam didn't have any blood whatsoever. But they were able to deliver without it.
MXLDisturbed 2 years ago
Yeah, thank you MXLDisturbed. Yeshua let's not jump to conclusions yet.
steeltownbrown52 2 years ago
The problem is you have 3 of these matches its going to be hard to do 3 of them with out blood that was more of the point.
TSlay1974 2 years ago
What can I say, I guess Yeshua loves the goop. Like I said we'll just have to wait and see.
steeltownbrown52 2 years ago
Who says there will be no blood? And there are only 2 Hell in a Cell matches, not 3.
MclarryOtto 2 years ago
1. Cena vs Orton
2. CM Punk vs Undertaker
3. DX vs Legacy
LightFincher 2 years ago
Er. Undertaker vs CM Punk,DX vs Legacy and Cena vs Orton. 3
knightruelz 2 years ago
Hmm oh yes, that's right. I guess I forgot about the tag one.
MclarryOtto 2 years ago
Comment removed
FitzyFitzMusic 2 years ago
I hate overgimmicking a PPV just for the sake of doing it. The best way to sell a PPV is with strong storylines involving compelling characters. By doing a PPV with all Cage Matches (TNA I'm looking at you), all Submission, all Extreme Rules, or HIACs, you are basically telling me that you aren't creative.
NYG4LIFE123 2 years ago
So basically, the no blood thing isn't the only problem with having 3 HIACs on one show. Its just a dumb idea to begin with.
NYG4LIFE123 2 years ago
I agree 100%,all the gimmick ppvs are really stupid,like we have HIAC,then Bragging Rights (internet voting) then its Survivor Series time but then we have TLC,WWE now have 7 gimmick ppvs which is crazy
FitzyFitzMusic 2 years ago
I remember saying back in 2005 that Lockdown was a stupid idea, and here we are 4 years later and WWE is on a pace to make sure all their B PPVs are named after a gimmick match.
Good Writing & Strong Characters sell....not gimmicks.
NYG4LIFE123 2 years ago
Exactly and thats why WWE are making all these gimmick PPVs,because they have no creativity anymore
Hopefully HIAC will get low buys and they will scrap it,i strongly doubt it will though
FitzyFitzMusic 2 years ago
there is definitely a place for gimmick ppvs and are no doubt needed. only when u have an over influx of them does it become stupid.
if i was running WWE id only have 5 or 6
Royal Rumble
No Way Out
Extreme Rules
Night of Champions
Survivor Series
everything else would in sense be throwaway.
its177 2 years ago
Edge vs Taker in HIAC was under the PG rating and it turned out well.
AntiheroicObserver 2 years ago
I didn't enjoy that match at all, and I don't think having blood would have helped it any. HIAC kinda feels stale now. I mean, I keep waiting for the next Foley moment, but when nothing close to that happens, the match feels like a let down.
aDance2Die2 2 years ago
Yes but you are going to have THREE even if it was 2, given one is a tag match, it would have been fine but I can't see doing three and NONE with out blood.
TSlay1974 2 years ago
yo t would you be interested in maybe doing like a dvd review competion with me? Is that stupid let me know?
gemni686 2 years ago
Hey will you tell MBWrestler that I'm not him.
ToothSIayer 2 years ago
I'm upset that Hell in a Cell might not have any blood. But last year the Undertaker/Edge Hell in a Cell had no blood and that was a great match.
Well Undertaker's arm bled, but that was hard way blood, no one bladed.
datboiwes3 2 years ago
well wwe has done it don't ask me what that it is it's alot of fucking things at this point.
seagreen152 2 years ago
Hell In A Cell with no blood = isnt going to work UNLESS they actually put some thought into these matches,we might see the first ever Hell In A Cell match with actually wrestling.
yeah thats not going to work,the crowd will be dead,surely they can have a little spot of blood atleast in the DX match?
FitzyFitzMusic 2 years ago
Bloodless Hell in a Cell.
Unless they plan on not using the cage that much, no biggie. If they do a NWA and have their face used like cheese graters, THEN we got a problem.
lightning116 2 years ago
What's up with you making these cellphone videos?
o_o
ImaginationArts1 2 years ago
His computer died. He said that in the last video he uploaded from his cellphone.
moralvirus 2 years ago
...Oh...I missed that part.
:P
ImaginationArts1 2 years ago
Please say he didnt just say Hell in a cell is going to be a blood free ppv.
YamiSilaas 2 years ago
Well yeah, WWE is rated PG now.
Shaggy6386 2 years ago
wow.......
Jeffhardy2297 2 years ago