He was not a Devil Worshipper: He was a writer, editor, poet, he was 'interested' in different religions and their basic similarities of 'experience'. He attained connection with the higher self through certain practises. He practised and wrote about the Occult & Magick - it was not BLACK Magic! He taught how to control the will, and thus the physical & mental body
to me "do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law" means that people should do whatever they want and this is a good thing, and NO!! im not saying people should kill each other that would be a simpleminded interpretation,what i really mean is that you can do whatever you want but you also cant prevent other people from doing whatever they want its like u cant kill or rape another person because you must respect their wanting to live and not be raped ,if you think about it is the perfect law
@DanteWhite its actually taken from an old and similar pagan proverb: An ye harm none, do what thou wilt. basically like what you said; as long as you don't hurt anyone, do whatever you want. although i don't like aleister crowley (he is an interesting person however) this is why i support Ron Paul. he endorses individual freedom and the right to choose what you want to do as long as it doesn't interfere with other people's freedoms or hurt them.
@cyberwaffles yeah im on the same boat, i think ron paul is ok and i agree with him on the civil and political sphere but when it comes to economics i disagree cause hes more on the right and i am a some kind of left wing libertarian (or anarchist) so though ron paul is the best candidate out there i dont think a government should exist and that people should vote for the laws and rules in the communities and make decisions collectively in a non hierarchical way
@DanteWhite i see where you are coming from, but he's actually a bonafide libertarian himself. he switched to the tea party to help him with his nomination. then again, i have to read up more on his economic ideology. still, i agree we need less government intervention and let the people make their own state and local laws. laws in california can be beneficial for many in their area, but not necessarily if they were in texas for example.
@PeterThenn You don't know me. Aleiste Crowley is a Satan Worshipping beast. And you are very misguided. Check out what Anton LaVey said on his deathbed such a big propagator of Do what thou wilt. May Allah guide us ALL AAMEEN!
Most people who hear "do as thou wilt" thinks the world would go mad with evil and have people killing and raping each other. This is not true. No one is born evil..we all all born the same with love..Its this satanic system we live in which makes people evil.
Crowley taught nothing of "Love" or "selflessness" He was a vile man who was ahead of his time in his ideas on "organized religion" and "social conditioning"; but he worshiped Lucifer and hated the idea of faith and obedience in El Shaddai. They didn't dub him "the beast" for nothing. He indulged in every possible sin known to man simply for the experience. This is a very deceiving video w/the nice music and the false comfort as to the true nature
@atlasshrugged2u Get away from our videos with your paranoid intolerant nonsense. You think every religion except your own is satanic, and therefore evil, and this makes you intolerant. Please leave your bigotry is not wanted here.
@PeterThenn not only was his self-dubbed 'great-beast' for shocking xtians, it was as it says = The Great Beast = LEO The Lion of the Zodiac, 666 = the magical square number for the Sun. i think his own mother even 'dubbed' him 'beast' or 'wicked little filthy beast'....
@atlasshrugged2u 'do what thou wilt' does not mean do whatever one pleases. *shakes head* 'Thelema' = 'Will' or 'Path'. it has the same numerological value as 'Agape' ('Love'),, 93.
@atlasshrugged2u This is not true. Crowley was not a satan worshiper nor was he really a "vile man." Obscene probably, but I wouldn't go as far to say vile. Do what thou Wilt means doing your Will and that only. At the same time it means allowing other to do their own Will, and therefore allowing maximum freedom for the world.
@atlasshrugged2u You have no idea. Do what thou WIll means so much more than what you say! It is the divine Will of God, YOUR divine will, connecting with your "holy guardian angel", being born again! All is love, there is no contradiction to the law, it is something you KNOW not believe, it is enlightenment, I am speaking from a place of KNOWING.
@AnoNothingNa Agree and feel the exact same way, yet Crowley is not my inspiration. I know the God of the bible and his Son Yeshua has ALL authority in heaven as on earth. I "test the spirits to see whether they are from God" and Crowley (even though he fulfilled his destiny of enlightenment) belonged to the evil one. So while I can respect his position on indulging in your deepest (sick) desires, God also has a way and it is through "love and compassion"not cruelty.Crowley was anything but...
The destruction of the ego is not needed nor is it wise (unless you want to be a usable instrument of confusion).
The True Will is the small, still voice within. Western society trains children that the Real You is ruled by the ego. Instead see the ego as a "Lion" to be tamed and commanded (never controlled). The "Virgin's" divine love is key to taming the Beast. When the True Self/True Feelings rules the ego the "Balancing" of thought with feeling become easy and death is no longer feared.
i hope this guy is not trying to say Crowley was a noble man. Crowley recommends sacrificing children to obtain the highest quality life force....uh......doesnt really matter what he says after that, hes a scumbag, period. Oh, and he was a proud pedophile, and admitted to chewing on nut sacks and eating poop, so uh...you can follow this sick fuck, i will go the other way.
'sacrificing children'.he never did this,not in the way(s) you're thinking.think masturbation.the man was,after all,a practicing Sex Magician,amongst many things.one should not always believe what the tabloids (of ANY era) or The Church propagate.please provide where he admits to raping children. yes, it's a known fact he practiced bi-sexuality/homosexuality as well.he was also one the most self-honest individuals one could ever read. 93 93/93
i respect all of what you said,it makes sense, but my true will really, tells me to reject all of what you said. i dont know why or what, it's just what i hear from the blue computer of my head, my self.
@superjoker6 RE: "i respect all of what you said,it makes sense, but my true will really, tells me to reject all of what you said. i dont know why or what, it's just what i hear from the blue computer of my head, my self."
i see that you see the point, even IF it said 'seeing' on your part eludes you.
If it's true that internal "god-ness" is the true "God;" how is it that we all exist in world that is external and constant apart from our intentions?
I think reality shows that God is external. Simply put, if my origin is unknown and my future is unknown, how can I assume that control is within? If origin and future have value apart from my efforts, it serves to reason that truth is apart from my efforts. To sum up, I believe that Jesus successfully died for sins.
@PeterThenn Cheers, I totally agree. But if God is everywhere then it's reasonable that his will is not the only thing that we express; as one's will opposes another's.
If it was really true that God opposed himself, then I don't believe the universe would maintain it's form. As the universe is consistent, I am apart from it in my inconsistency. I think that sustained existence coupled with choice = generosity, not right. If I am morally inconsistent (selfish), how am I Godly? If I will die..?
These are just words of course, but In my opinion we don't exist in external world. Some things we SEE seem to be external, but so do objects in the dream world until we wake up. At least in my experience seer (which we essentially are) is internal.
I don't know how it is in English, but Jesus said that "don't you know that kingdom of heaven is within you".
Quote “we are the sense organs of the infinite” says very well how I see it.
Your English is good. In accordance with other things Jesus said in the Bible; He was talking about the personally active part of the kingdom, in this earthly life. He wasn't talking about the kingdom as a whole.
Dreams-: One must consider the difference between reality (awake), and picturing something in the mind (awake). With the difference, which one is more like dreaming?
Also, the science of brain function (based on electricity) is not comparative to the electricity needed for reality.
There is so many interpretations, that my choice is to listen to my heart or other's hearts or minds. I have to choose the first option.
One day we may realize that the whole process - as solid as it seems - happens in one consciousness and is more will than matter. Hence the dreaming allegory.
Not sure about the last sentence, but In the level of processes, there is clearly laws in which this process happens and it feels VERY real to us that are part of this process.
@Vaala091 "One day we may realize that the whole process - as solid as it seems - happens in one consciousness and is more will than matter. Hence the dreaming allegory." --I believe this to be accurate. What you're suggesting here is monotheism. This idea begs a product of reality (a person) to consider (as one who holds the ability to do so) the actual and quantifiable difference between one's reality, and one's dreams; which take place whilst one sleeps, on a bed, in the real.
@metronomic1 -said the man who thought he had understanding to the other man who thought he had understanding.
I'm interested to hear what you think is true, as far as non-duality and whatnot. I also wanna say that what I've written here, from my point of view, is not talking about duality. But rather about singularity.. as in, there is one (singular) reality in which we all abide.."a universe," from which we all physically depart, "die."
@finalmattasy As long as you continue to see yourself as separate than the reality you are immersed in you are thinking in duality. The observer and the observed are the same, there is no separation for one could not exist without the other. You aren't real.
@metronomic1 That's an interesting idea of course, but I don't see your reasoning. Denying separation due to coexistence is not logical. If so though, I take it that when you die, nothing will have changed in regards to reality. Also, that when a lizard eats a bug, nothing has taken place, due coexistence.
I think that for one to even be able to use the terms "observer" and "observed;" they prove to themselves that there is a difference (i.e. separation) however slight, between the two.
@finalmattasy There is no difference. Your conditioned "logic" is what keeps you from seeing the truth. You keep grasping at reality through duality. Your use of the word "coexistence" illustrates this. There is only one existence and one awareness. There is only one. Or in reality there is only zero.
@metronomic1 Ok, so my use of "coexistence" illustrates my view of duality. If that's so, then what does your use of the words "observer" and "observed" illustrate?
I'm down with "there is only one." But if there is only zero, then who's responding to my youtube posts?
Buddhism may be a somewhat popular belief, but I hope that your adherence to your views can be supported by more than your own insistence that, "that's just the way it is."
I agree. But I'm saying that according to his own (and all humanity's) natural understanding of "observer" and "observed," that what he purports is truly not the way it is.
In the same vein of what you're saying, Ancient Asian writings don't hold value (in the realm of truth) because of them being either Ancient, or Asian. They're only true if they're true. In opposition to Buddhism's proposed validity, I argue that the teaching of one's naturally birthed understanding being wrong.. is wrong.
@finalmattasy You just aren't getting it. Thats fine it takes many years to undo all the conditioning nailed to you by life. And actually I am a Thelemite not a Buddhist. This is a Thelemic video not Buddhist. I wish you well on your journey. You have the right answers now look for the right questions.
"Conditioning nailed to you by life" What an interesting statement ! So reality/existence has conditioned you unto things which are false.. about reality/existence!?
Regardless of whether Thelema or Buddhism is the original form of the ideas that you propose (which I'm sure neither of them are), I don't think such ideas are right (about reality/existence). I've stated why. It's not like I can't mentally and/or emotionally go to where you're talking about, it's that imo it's sensibly wrong.
this doesn't make any sense, it doesn't have to do absolutely with christianity or islam, because all of those religions are aimed to be englihtened by looking outside , a god who is divided and in Thelema, you're your own god and the summun bonnum is to have conversation with your Saint Guardian Angel.
Your right in that this quote is often misinterpreted but I think your wrong in most other aspects. I dont think Crowleys concept of "True Will" had much to do with God.
@richcapo love not only your fellow man or being, yourself as well... w/out Lustful results. in other words, w/out satisfaction or desire to a particular result or lack of a particular result...
@AnkHknA Sounds like a great philosophy to me -- very reminiscent of what we're taught as Freemasons, which makes sense, given Crowley's Masonic roots.
bro why cover up what crowley is saying with your god this god that bull read his sex magik book and you will see how much he cared about god and all his sheep
@PeterThenn True that they sure have, but that doesnt mean Chritianity is bad. So why mention it? And beside thoes self-called Christians wil be delt with if they dont change their ways.
wow. the beginning of wisdom, is ageing the terms. or in this case what love means? Jesus blessed the little children, gave his life for our sins. Crowley raped children and used people for his own lusts. he did however call this love and i think looking at his works in a very strange way he thought it was. we see his love in his treatment of his first born child.
this however is not love but the selfish ways of those so call "enlightened one",
@philip2260 If what you say about him is true, He would have died in prison. The Authorities were looking for any possible reason to put him away. I have a lovely picture of Crowley with his wife and daughter, It looks so domestic.
Young religious kids....always so devilishly vicious...towards something they can't get their heads around (yet)...
About time every single religious book, get's a sticker "could cause onesightedness", "Could cause dividement"
Laws on Blasphemy may come down now, cuz it's tottally in conflict with actuall fundamentalism....wich is saying: All may be, all can be (so that one does'nt have to feel threathnend by the rest of their friends in their village). Teamcolours will fade! finally..14-23-15
pfff Hell,...whoever came up with that concept................(?)................ did'nt reconsider that since it's so hot in there...one vaporize's before even actually getting there...
you need professional help fucking retard. you make fun of Jesus your lord and now your ideal is that fucker most wicket man ...you fucking gona burn in hell. dum ass.
Please... learn to spell then do some research into your argument before posting. Or don't and further concrete my beliefs that the majority of christians are hypocritical sheeple.
Comment removed
cyberwaffles 1 week ago
He was not a Devil Worshipper: He was a writer, editor, poet, he was 'interested' in different religions and their basic similarities of 'experience'. He attained connection with the higher self through certain practises. He practised and wrote about the Occult & Magick - it was not BLACK Magic! He taught how to control the will, and thus the physical & mental body
handbagsatdusk 2 weeks ago
to me "do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law" means that people should do whatever they want and this is a good thing, and NO!! im not saying people should kill each other that would be a simpleminded interpretation,what i really mean is that you can do whatever you want but you also cant prevent other people from doing whatever they want its like u cant kill or rape another person because you must respect their wanting to live and not be raped ,if you think about it is the perfect law
DanteWhite 2 months ago
@DanteWhite its actually taken from an old and similar pagan proverb: An ye harm none, do what thou wilt. basically like what you said; as long as you don't hurt anyone, do whatever you want. although i don't like aleister crowley (he is an interesting person however) this is why i support Ron Paul. he endorses individual freedom and the right to choose what you want to do as long as it doesn't interfere with other people's freedoms or hurt them.
cyberwaffles 2 months ago
@cyberwaffles yeah im on the same boat, i think ron paul is ok and i agree with him on the civil and political sphere but when it comes to economics i disagree cause hes more on the right and i am a some kind of left wing libertarian (or anarchist) so though ron paul is the best candidate out there i dont think a government should exist and that people should vote for the laws and rules in the communities and make decisions collectively in a non hierarchical way
DanteWhite 1 month ago
@DanteWhite i see where you are coming from, but he's actually a bonafide libertarian himself. he switched to the tea party to help him with his nomination. then again, i have to read up more on his economic ideology. still, i agree we need less government intervention and let the people make their own state and local laws. laws in california can be beneficial for many in their area, but not necessarily if they were in texas for example.
cyberwaffles 1 month ago
ISLAM DESN'T RESPECT DEVIL-WORSHIPPERS! L'ANATULLAH ON ALEISTER CROWLEY THE DIRTY BEAST OF A MAN!
HANEEFAGREENBIRD 2 months ago
@HANEEFAGREENBIRD
Allah is Merciful, Allah is Compassionate, Allah is Just.
So why are you and so many of his other worshippers none of these things?
PeterThenn 2 months ago 2
@PeterThenn You don't know me. Aleiste Crowley is a Satan Worshipping beast. And you are very misguided. Check out what Anton LaVey said on his deathbed such a big propagator of Do what thou wilt. May Allah guide us ALL AAMEEN!
HANEEFAGREENBIRD 2 months ago
@HANEEFAGREENBIRD
The people who call Crowley a Satanist are as reputable
as those who say that all Muslims are Terrorists.
And LaVey twisted Crowley's writings to his own purposes.
PeterThenn 2 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@PeterThenn May the Creator guide us ALL AAMEEN
HANEEFAGREENBIRD 2 months ago
@PeterThenn what about infidels?
DanteWhite 2 months ago
@curtismarshall81 EXACTLY!! Tell the truth
atlasshrugged2u 3 months ago
@curtismarshall81 Those were jokes, kinda like saturday night live or Jack Black get it? lol
fushapanther 4 months ago
@curtismarshall81 If you belief Crowley did those things I got some land in Florida i'd like to sell you
fushapanther 4 months ago
@curtismarshall81
Proof?
If there were any, he would have been hanged.
PeterThenn 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So, what you are saying is, you have no proof.
Kaseynaa 4 months ago
Most people who hear "do as thou wilt" thinks the world would go mad with evil and have people killing and raping each other. This is not true. No one is born evil..we all all born the same with love..Its this satanic system we live in which makes people evil.
EDLFC 6 months ago
Comment removed
EDLFC 6 months ago
93
Shriner66 7 months ago
"Do what thou wilt" means just what it says.
Crowley taught nothing of "Love" or "selflessness" He was a vile man who was ahead of his time in his ideas on "organized religion" and "social conditioning"; but he worshiped Lucifer and hated the idea of faith and obedience in El Shaddai. They didn't dub him "the beast" for nothing. He indulged in every possible sin known to man simply for the experience. This is a very deceiving video w/the nice music and the false comfort as to the true nature
atlasshrugged2u 8 months ago 2
@atlasshrugged2u amen! crowley was a fine man!
scssrs 7 months ago
@atlasshrugged2u
His Faith was in Ain Soph Aur not Lucifer.
He dubbed Himself 'The Great Beast' to shock Christians.
PeterThenn 7 months ago 2
@PeterThenn Give it "whatever name" you want, it's still Lucifer (who has many names and philosphies for all your tastes and preferences) behind it
It doesen't really matter to me that "he himself" dubbed the name or "why" the point is THIS is what he was known as (and for good rreason)
atlasshrugged2u 7 months ago
@atlasshrugged2u Get away from our videos with your paranoid intolerant nonsense. You think every religion except your own is satanic, and therefore evil, and this makes you intolerant. Please leave your bigotry is not wanted here.
spilledinsanity 6 months ago
@PeterThenn not only was his self-dubbed 'great-beast' for shocking xtians, it was as it says = The Great Beast = LEO The Lion of the Zodiac, 666 = the magical square number for the Sun. i think his own mother even 'dubbed' him 'beast' or 'wicked little filthy beast'....
AnkHknA 6 months ago
@atlasshrugged2u 'do what thou wilt' does not mean do whatever one pleases. *shakes head* 'Thelema' = 'Will' or 'Path'. it has the same numerological value as 'Agape' ('Love'),, 93.
AnkHknA 6 months ago
@atlasshrugged2u This is not true. Crowley was not a satan worshiper nor was he really a "vile man." Obscene probably, but I wouldn't go as far to say vile. Do what thou Wilt means doing your Will and that only. At the same time it means allowing other to do their own Will, and therefore allowing maximum freedom for the world.
spilledinsanity 6 months ago
@atlasshrugged2u You have no idea. Do what thou WIll means so much more than what you say! It is the divine Will of God, YOUR divine will, connecting with your "holy guardian angel", being born again! All is love, there is no contradiction to the law, it is something you KNOW not believe, it is enlightenment, I am speaking from a place of KNOWING.
AnoNothingNa 1 week ago
@AnoNothingNa Agree and feel the exact same way, yet Crowley is not my inspiration. I know the God of the bible and his Son Yeshua has ALL authority in heaven as on earth. I "test the spirits to see whether they are from God" and Crowley (even though he fulfilled his destiny of enlightenment) belonged to the evil one. So while I can respect his position on indulging in your deepest (sick) desires, God also has a way and it is through "love and compassion"not cruelty.Crowley was anything but...
atlasshrugged2u 1 week ago
The destruction of the ego is not needed nor is it wise (unless you want to be a usable instrument of confusion).
The True Will is the small, still voice within. Western society trains children that the Real You is ruled by the ego. Instead see the ego as a "Lion" to be tamed and commanded (never controlled). The "Virgin's" divine love is key to taming the Beast. When the True Self/True Feelings rules the ego the "Balancing" of thought with feeling become easy and death is no longer feared.
RJ0923 8 months ago
@RJ0923 Dude I just read that and that was pretty deep?...I respect that
atlasshrugged2u 5 days ago
There is no God but man.
Nocturnalincision 10 months ago
i hope this guy is not trying to say Crowley was a noble man. Crowley recommends sacrificing children to obtain the highest quality life force....uh......doesnt really matter what he says after that, hes a scumbag, period. Oh, and he was a proud pedophile, and admitted to chewing on nut sacks and eating poop, so uh...you can follow this sick fuck, i will go the other way.
elrugged1 10 months ago
@elrugged1
93
'sacrificing children'.he never did this,not in the way(s) you're thinking.think masturbation.the man was,after all,a practicing Sex Magician,amongst many things.one should not always believe what the tabloids (of ANY era) or The Church propagate.please provide where he admits to raping children. yes, it's a known fact he practiced bi-sexuality/homosexuality as well.he was also one the most self-honest individuals one could ever read. 93 93/93
AnkHknA 10 months ago
The whole of the law shall be to stick your finger up your own arse.
Silvertrine 10 months ago
Today the book of the law is 107 years old! how the time does fly :D
SatansMullet 10 months ago
i respect all of what you said,it makes sense, but my true will really, tells me to reject all of what you said. i dont know why or what, it's just what i hear from the blue computer of my head, my self.
superjoker6 1 year ago
@superjoker6 RE: "i respect all of what you said,it makes sense, but my true will really, tells me to reject all of what you said. i dont know why or what, it's just what i hear from the blue computer of my head, my self."
i see that you see the point, even IF it said 'seeing' on your part eludes you.
AnkHknA 10 months ago
If it's true that internal "god-ness" is the true "God;" how is it that we all exist in world that is external and constant apart from our intentions?
I think reality shows that God is external. Simply put, if my origin is unknown and my future is unknown, how can I assume that control is within? If origin and future have value apart from my efforts, it serves to reason that truth is apart from my efforts. To sum up, I believe that Jesus successfully died for sins.
finalmattasy 1 year ago
@finalmattasy
If God is Omnipresent, then at least a part of Him is within you.
Otherwise He could not be everywhere.
PeterThenn 1 year ago 2
@PeterThenn Cheers, I totally agree. But if God is everywhere then it's reasonable that his will is not the only thing that we express; as one's will opposes another's.
If it was really true that God opposed himself, then I don't believe the universe would maintain it's form. As the universe is consistent, I am apart from it in my inconsistency. I think that sustained existence coupled with choice = generosity, not right. If I am morally inconsistent (selfish), how am I Godly? If I will die..?
finalmattasy 1 year ago
@finalmattasy
These are just words of course, but In my opinion we don't exist in external world. Some things we SEE seem to be external, but so do objects in the dream world until we wake up. At least in my experience seer (which we essentially are) is internal.
I don't know how it is in English, but Jesus said that "don't you know that kingdom of heaven is within you".
Quote “we are the sense organs of the infinite” says very well how I see it.
Sorry my poor language.
Vaala091 9 months ago
Your English is good. In accordance with other things Jesus said in the Bible; He was talking about the personally active part of the kingdom, in this earthly life. He wasn't talking about the kingdom as a whole.
Dreams-: One must consider the difference between reality (awake), and picturing something in the mind (awake). With the difference, which one is more like dreaming?
Also, the science of brain function (based on electricity) is not comparative to the electricity needed for reality.
finalmattasy 9 months ago
@finalmattasy
There is so many interpretations, that my choice is to listen to my heart or other's hearts or minds. I have to choose the first option.
One day we may realize that the whole process - as solid as it seems - happens in one consciousness and is more will than matter. Hence the dreaming allegory.
Not sure about the last sentence, but In the level of processes, there is clearly laws in which this process happens and it feels VERY real to us that are part of this process.
Vaala091 9 months ago
@Vaala091 "One day we may realize that the whole process - as solid as it seems - happens in one consciousness and is more will than matter. Hence the dreaming allegory." --I believe this to be accurate. What you're suggesting here is monotheism. This idea begs a product of reality (a person) to consider (as one who holds the ability to do so) the actual and quantifiable difference between one's reality, and one's dreams; which take place whilst one sleeps, on a bed, in the real.
finalmattasy 9 months ago
@finalmattasy You need to stop thinking in dualities. Only then can you have an inkling of true understanding.
metronomic1 8 months ago
@metronomic1 -said the man who thought he had understanding to the other man who thought he had understanding.
I'm interested to hear what you think is true, as far as non-duality and whatnot. I also wanna say that what I've written here, from my point of view, is not talking about duality. But rather about singularity.. as in, there is one (singular) reality in which we all abide.."a universe," from which we all physically depart, "die."
finalmattasy 8 months ago
@finalmattasy As long as you continue to see yourself as separate than the reality you are immersed in you are thinking in duality. The observer and the observed are the same, there is no separation for one could not exist without the other. You aren't real.
metronomic1 8 months ago
@metronomic1 That's an interesting idea of course, but I don't see your reasoning. Denying separation due to coexistence is not logical. If so though, I take it that when you die, nothing will have changed in regards to reality. Also, that when a lizard eats a bug, nothing has taken place, due coexistence.
I think that for one to even be able to use the terms "observer" and "observed;" they prove to themselves that there is a difference (i.e. separation) however slight, between the two.
finalmattasy 8 months ago
@finalmattasy There is no difference. Your conditioned "logic" is what keeps you from seeing the truth. You keep grasping at reality through duality. Your use of the word "coexistence" illustrates this. There is only one existence and one awareness. There is only one. Or in reality there is only zero.
metronomic1 8 months ago
@metronomic1 Ok, so my use of "coexistence" illustrates my view of duality. If that's so, then what does your use of the words "observer" and "observed" illustrate?
I'm down with "there is only one." But if there is only zero, then who's responding to my youtube posts?
Buddhism may be a somewhat popular belief, but I hope that your adherence to your views can be supported by more than your own insistence that, "that's just the way it is."
finalmattasy 8 months ago
@finalmattasy
If that is truly the way it is,
then 'that is just the way it is'
is valid support for his views.
PeterThenn 8 months ago
I agree. But I'm saying that according to his own (and all humanity's) natural understanding of "observer" and "observed," that what he purports is truly not the way it is.
In the same vein of what you're saying, Ancient Asian writings don't hold value (in the realm of truth) because of them being either Ancient, or Asian. They're only true if they're true. In opposition to Buddhism's proposed validity, I argue that the teaching of one's naturally birthed understanding being wrong.. is wrong.
finalmattasy 8 months ago
@finalmattasy You just aren't getting it. Thats fine it takes many years to undo all the conditioning nailed to you by life. And actually I am a Thelemite not a Buddhist. This is a Thelemic video not Buddhist. I wish you well on your journey. You have the right answers now look for the right questions.
metronomic1 8 months ago
"Conditioning nailed to you by life" What an interesting statement ! So reality/existence has conditioned you unto things which are false.. about reality/existence!?
Regardless of whether Thelema or Buddhism is the original form of the ideas that you propose (which I'm sure neither of them are), I don't think such ideas are right (about reality/existence). I've stated why. It's not like I can't mentally and/or emotionally go to where you're talking about, it's that imo it's sensibly wrong.
finalmattasy 8 months ago
Cool, video.
TheLuciferianAvatar 1 year ago
First time I've seen the Great man's name spelt Aliester...
LOSERDAD1 1 year ago
that's the wrong 7 pointed star, i'm just sayin.
kennycwhetstone 1 year ago
@kennycwhetstone
For Thelema and Crowley you are correct.
However it is the right one for me.
:)
PeterThenn 1 year ago
this doesn't make any sense, it doesn't have to do absolutely with christianity or islam, because all of those religions are aimed to be englihtened by looking outside , a god who is divided and in Thelema, you're your own god and the summun bonnum is to have conversation with your Saint Guardian Angel.
chenfen13 1 year ago
@chenfen13
A quote attributed to Mohammed - 'Know yourself, and then you will know God'
Thelema is partly rooted in Jewish and Christian Mysticism.
And if you think that you are your own God, read the Oath of the Abyss.
And EVERYTHING below the Abyss is divided, even God.
PeterThenn 1 year ago
Your right in that this quote is often misinterpreted but I think your wrong in most other aspects. I dont think Crowleys concept of "True Will" had much to do with God.
1amsm1th 1 year ago
@1amsm1th
Not in the Christian/Western sense of God,
but in the sense of the Brahman/Atman of Hinduism.
The God within, not the Old Man in Heaven.
PeterThenn 1 year ago
@PeterThenn I see. That certainly fits with his idea much better.
1amsm1th 1 year ago
@1amsm1th True will, from what I understand, means the unrestrained and perfect capacity to love your fellow man.
richcapo 11 months ago
@richcapo love not only your fellow man or being, yourself as well... w/out Lustful results. in other words, w/out satisfaction or desire to a particular result or lack of a particular result...
AnkHknA 10 months ago
@AnkHknA Sounds like a great philosophy to me -- very reminiscent of what we're taught as Freemasons, which makes sense, given Crowley's Masonic roots.
richcapo 10 months ago
bro why cover up what crowley is saying with your god this god that bull read his sex magik book and you will see how much he cared about god and all his sheep
goddi13 1 year ago
Comment removed
Sannacbrannon 1 year ago
@Sannacbrannon I feel sorry for you... Brainwashed like all the others.......
ModdingNation1 1 year ago
This video is wrong. I guess the one who made it obviously don't know about Crowley!
vares111 1 year ago
@vares111
And maybe he has read a lot more of Crowley's works than you have, and ignored the misinformation and the Urban Legends about the man.
PeterThenn 1 year ago
@PeterThenn don't think so.
vares111 1 year ago
Actually, I think whoever did this knew exactly what he was doing as a disciple of Crowley.
Posing as an angel of light, The devil comes to steal, kill and destroy.
Jesus and Paul were both very clear about NOT mixing anyone or anything with Jesus.
To mix Jesus with anyone or anything else is deception plain and simple.
jtubeu2288 1 year ago
@jtubeu2288
Or I could be posing as a Angel of Darkness in order to lead those who have strayed back to the Light.
PeterThenn 1 year ago
Cloaking evil as good huh? What are you a witch?
JonMJ 1 year ago
@JonMJ Some Christians have been cloaking evil as good for almost two Millenia.
PeterThenn 1 year ago
@PeterThenn True that they sure have, but that doesnt mean Chritianity is bad. So why mention it? And beside thoes self-called Christians wil be delt with if they dont change their ways.
lmarr07 1 year ago
@lmarr07 I mentioned it because the person above is acting like one of those
so-called Christians. If you are not Christian, they call you Evil.
PeterThenn 1 year ago
Great video, set the record straight
NotAsOtherz 1 year ago
wow. the beginning of wisdom, is ageing the terms. or in this case what love means? Jesus blessed the little children, gave his life for our sins. Crowley raped children and used people for his own lusts. he did however call this love and i think looking at his works in a very strange way he thought it was. we see his love in his treatment of his first born child.
this however is not love but the selfish ways of those so call "enlightened one",
philip2260 1 year ago
@philip2260 If what you say about him is true, He would have died in prison. The Authorities were looking for any possible reason to put him away. I have a lovely picture of Crowley with his wife and daughter, It looks so domestic.
PeterThenn 1 year ago
Look into that....seriously! it's interesting ...
who brought you the concept of Satan then?
C'mon be honest!
SweetFire96 2 years ago
Young religious kids....always so devilishly vicious...towards something they can't get their heads around (yet)...
About time every single religious book, get's a sticker "could cause onesightedness", "Could cause dividement"
Laws on Blasphemy may come down now, cuz it's tottally in conflict with actuall fundamentalism....wich is saying: All may be, all can be (so that one does'nt have to feel threathnend by the rest of their friends in their village). Teamcolours will fade! finally..14-23-15
SweetFire96 2 years ago
pfff Hell,...whoever came up with that concept................(?)................ did'nt reconsider that since it's so hot in there...one vaporize's before even actually getting there...
SweetFire96 2 years ago
you need professional help fucking retard. you make fun of Jesus your lord and now your ideal is that fucker most wicket man ...you fucking gona burn in hell. dum ass.
saadabdulaziz 2 years ago
Please... learn to spell then do some research into your argument before posting. Or don't and further concrete my beliefs that the majority of christians are hypocritical sheeple.
judoublegalooo 1 year ago
93, Beautifully done.
phosteres 2 years ago
do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law i got that tattood on me words to truly live b
sidxevil 2 years ago
aliester crowley said it he was the beast 666 he said
primetimebeatz 2 years ago 2
He would have said He was Jesus Christ or Ghandi if he thought it would piss enough people off.
PeterThenn 2 years ago
This video is 100% incorrect. Satanism is not Christianity (a religion of selfless love); it is the opposite (selfish love and hate).
1Nyro 2 years ago
This is not about Satanism, but Thelema.
Lavey took a lot from Crowley
and put his own spin on it.
PeterThenn 2 years ago
Crowley is a Satanist.
1Nyro 2 years ago
You evidently do not know much
about Crowley.
PeterThenn 2 years ago
You're right. His referring to himself as "The Beast" and his number as "666" is obviously not Satanic by any measure.
1Nyro 2 years ago
Crowley would do almost anything to shock the Public.
You need to study his beliefs,
Not his Propaganda.
PeterThenn 2 years ago
Do thine true will, sorry had to correct the english
aukxsona 2 years ago
I never claimed to be Perfect.
I don't have any nail wounds. :)
PeterThenn 2 years ago
LOL
aukxsona 2 years ago
That was perfect.
skkaskey 2 years ago
this is not completely true...thelemaite...B...
bskullkrusher 3 years ago
5 Stars bro....
Witchyshaman 3 years ago