The Field - Caroline

[xmfdibujito]

this sounds like Neu!

[12pieter34]

@DvonKron and @bodyinparticular

please get a room and let us enjoy the song

thanks

[borowczyk76]

This sounds like something off of Zuckerzeit by Cluster...

[clitonslave]

this is good



[antoniodoido]

terrible, hard to believe its from "the field".



[DJIGGZ92]

@antoniodoido Not enjoying it either, but he's still easily one of my favourite producers. From Here We Go Sublime is one of the greatest electronic albums ever made in my opinion.

[DvonKron]

Axel Willner:

This is cool. Just create a new moniker for this type of musik. It isn't The Field. I support your different directions

[bodyinparticular]

@DvonKron

DvonKron:

So you are supposed to change your name because you do something that isn't all too similar to something you have already done? An overly defined expectation of something that is characterized by creativity is simply backwards and the very thing that plagues art by pigeonholing artists, creating trends, and breeding predictability, and making it just all less interesting and expressive, i.e., exactly why artists don't change monikers.

[DvonKron]

@bodyinparticular The Field was such a genius and specific project, a project in which the LIMITS of the music made it so genius and expansive. and it was this expansiveness and endlessness which was so great for the name: The Field. I have a fondness for the fact that in the 90's electronic producers like W. Voigt, who The Field is heavily influenced by, felt the freedom to push boundaries in many different ways by creating many different monikers, and in that way not pigeonholing themselves

[bodyinparticular]

@DvonKron I don't see where TheField is defined as a specific project other than the audience defining it as such based on commonalities across songs.To regard those commonalities as LIMITS and to hold them to it is pigeonholing.Creating a new moniker is just an easier way to categorize something different,something a secretary would be concerned with. There is no need for different monikers if there are no boundaries. Who wouldn't more respect something because it has no boundaries?

[DvonKron]

@bodyinparticular Actually creating new monikers makes things more difficult, just look at W. Voigt's discogs. Look-- I LOVE The Field. I was just musing about the way some underground music used to me released. And I still stand by my statements, PARTICULARLY for the Field, which represents such purity and minimalism. The funny thing about art is that Limits are liberating, because you make your own, and they spark creation. and what you write as mere "commonalities" was in fact a clear vision

[bodyinparticular]

@DvonKron You are defining the Field based on your own interpretation, limiting another's work to fit your idea of purity/minimalism.Tools ex. a painter's brush/paints are limits,but being limited to those tools does not limit the creative process with those tools.It seems you are suggesting that the creative process should not deviate from one's canon(w/o a moniker change)-your use of the word LIMITS-which contradicts the idea of an artist making their own, allowing creativity as CAROLINE does

[speedboot4000]

super! ich mag es. sehr krautrockig. 

[TicklingNoise]

Like always, the Field doesn't disappoint.

[pmclfc]

wow

this is absolutely brilliant!

[slutrag4000]

WOW.

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE.

[lebannerfan65]

@slutrag4000

Suffering from a taste deficiency?