Point #1 - I am not the one harping on hydrogen, YOU are. Your video is evidence of that. Our cells make a portion of orthohydrogen, parahydrogen, and oxygen in a perfect 2:1 ratio. Not just the parahydrogen your faulty calculations are based on.
Point #2: This study was done using the products of electrolysis, not just plain hydrogen. READ THE DOCUMENT.
The difference in energy between para and ortho is only 0.42 percent. HHO is only perfect when it is by itself. When it is mixed in the engine with huge quantities of air (21 percent oxygen and 79 percent nitrogen, it is no longer pure HHO.
AsI have explained to you many MANY times, it's not the BTU content that matters. It's the REACTIVITY. I have pointed this out to you over and over again - and the concept is still just a true now as it was then.
Smack, I know you have seen my BMW Hydrogen 7 numbers that came directly from BMW. They clearly show that to travel the same distance it travels on hydrogen, requires the same amount of BTU as it does when you flip the switch to run on gasoline. So clearly, BTU matters very much so
ES2008, you've got the perfect opportunity to discuss the contents of this paper in a concrete fashion and instead you're trying to split hairs and use diversionary tactics. Why is he doing that..........anybody know why?
E.S. we all know that you are a distractor/distractor of HHO. Well, I'm making ionized hydrogen and ozone and it's costing me ZERO extra energy to do it because of the electric coils that I'm using. On top of that, I get monopole magnetic fields from my coils that I get to use to aid in the production of HHO.
Face it, your math needs to be readjusted.
People like Smack and myself will just start putting out extremely efficient devices that will prove what we claim.
@MikePowers420 - We have been over the ionized hydrogen issue on other video comments. The concesus was that you have offered absolutely no proof of what you say. You simply say you cannot reveal the details. As my video shows, even at 100 percent Faraday electrolysis efficiency, it is still an energy loss because a 20-25% efficient engine powering a 85 percent efficient altenator, powering an electrolysis device, can never deliver more energy than its consumption.
I'm sure you have read US Patent 4,023,545. It discusses the addition of H2/O2 to an internal combustion engine where petroleum is the primary fuel to enhance the burning characteristics and other related things. The patent for what you call a booster.
I said before that I plan to make better engines and so on once I get done with my fight. But I can tell you for sure that I won't be doing it in either the US or Canada. Both countries are on there way to becoming the next Nazi countries. What with all the new taxes, theft of rights and money by both governments I ain't staying around to put in a death camp. Not going to get that bad? I sure hope not but still I've had enough and am heading else where when all is settled.
I think this is great. When I get done suing the scum bags that railroaded me into jail I intend to build a variant of the Larson Radax Engine that will run amazingly well on alcohol and hydrogen.
I will tune it to run on alcohol first and hydrogen second. This is because alcohol as fuel is easier to come by in large quantities.
I think that hho addition or injection is a very important aspect of future low to non polluting engines. We don't have to give up cars just dirty fuel!!
You keep harping on hydrogen, but water by mass is 89 percent oxygen and only 11 percent hydrogen.
EnergySupply2008 2 years ago
Did I burst your BTU bubble???
EletrikRide 2 years ago
Point #1 - I am not the one harping on hydrogen, YOU are. Your video is evidence of that. Our cells make a portion of orthohydrogen, parahydrogen, and oxygen in a perfect 2:1 ratio. Not just the parahydrogen your faulty calculations are based on.
Point #2: This study was done using the products of electrolysis, not just plain hydrogen. READ THE DOCUMENT.
It's time for you to revisit your coveted books.
EletrikRide 2 years ago
The difference in energy between para and ortho is only 0.42 percent. HHO is only perfect when it is by itself. When it is mixed in the engine with huge quantities of air (21 percent oxygen and 79 percent nitrogen, it is no longer pure HHO.
EnergySupply2008 2 years ago
AsI have explained to you many MANY times, it's not the BTU content that matters. It's the REACTIVITY. I have pointed this out to you over and over again - and the concept is still just a true now as it was then.
P=E/T
Reca'nize.
EletrikRide 2 years ago
Smack, I know you have seen my BMW Hydrogen 7 numbers that came directly from BMW. They clearly show that to travel the same distance it travels on hydrogen, requires the same amount of BTU as it does when you flip the switch to run on gasoline. So clearly, BTU matters very much so
Reca'nize
EnergySupply2008 2 years ago
Irrelevant. Scientific studies prove that flame speed is vital to power delivery.
You shall reca'nize. don't try to be like me, dude - you just don't have the skills.
EletrikRide 2 years ago
ES2008, you've got the perfect opportunity to discuss the contents of this paper in a concrete fashion and instead you're trying to split hairs and use diversionary tactics. Why is he doing that..........anybody know why?
captainwho1 2 years ago
Anyone...... anyone....
anyone.....??????
EletrikRide 2 years ago
@Captainwho1 - Read my six part post on Smack's video part 1. Then you will understand the shortcomings of this paper.
EnergySupply2008 2 years ago
E.S. we all know that you are a distractor/distractor of HHO. Well, I'm making ionized hydrogen and ozone and it's costing me ZERO extra energy to do it because of the electric coils that I'm using. On top of that, I get monopole magnetic fields from my coils that I get to use to aid in the production of HHO.
Face it, your math needs to be readjusted.
People like Smack and myself will just start putting out extremely efficient devices that will prove what we claim.
Deal with it
mikepowers420 2 years ago
@MikePowers420 - We have been over the ionized hydrogen issue on other video comments. The concesus was that you have offered absolutely no proof of what you say. You simply say you cannot reveal the details. As my video shows, even at 100 percent Faraday electrolysis efficiency, it is still an energy loss because a 20-25% efficient engine powering a 85 percent efficient altenator, powering an electrolysis device, can never deliver more energy than its consumption.
EnergySupply2008 2 years ago
Gasoline by mass is only 15% hydrogen. Not that it means anything. I guess what I'm trying to say is... what is your point?
cuke8466 2 years ago
Im printing it also and taking it with me to the skeptics. Lo and behold the HHO bible has been printed.
nice video. and funny too!
delvis11 2 years ago
Right on, thanks! Who says I don't have a sense of humor, lol!
EletrikRide 2 years ago
With 5% H2/O2 added, if it gives a 15% fuel savings, does this benefit cover the cost of the electricity required to produce 25 l/min?
25 l/min requires a lot of electricity, is it more or less than the 15% fuel savings?
Donaldwfc 2 years ago
You need to read the document again. As I clearly explained, the energy required to make the gas was calculated into the final efficiency numbers.
EletrikRide 2 years ago
Thanks, I overlooked that part.
I'm sure you have read US Patent 4,023,545. It discusses the addition of H2/O2 to an internal combustion engine where petroleum is the primary fuel to enhance the burning characteristics and other related things. The patent for what you call a booster.
Donaldwfc 2 years ago
I don't think I've seen that patent, I'll check it out, thanks!
EletrikRide 2 years ago
I said before that I plan to make better engines and so on once I get done with my fight. But I can tell you for sure that I won't be doing it in either the US or Canada. Both countries are on there way to becoming the next Nazi countries. What with all the new taxes, theft of rights and money by both governments I ain't staying around to put in a death camp. Not going to get that bad? I sure hope not but still I've had enough and am heading else where when all is settled.
scarmenl 2 years ago
I do hope that you are able to work beyond your current troubles and achieve your dream of improved engine technology
EletrikRide 2 years ago
Thanks for sharing this information !!!
hahahahaha epic video, awesome job Smack :-))
insAneTunA 2 years ago
thanks!
EletrikRide 2 years ago
Smack, Do you have a link to that publication?
cuke8466 2 years ago
see sidebar
EletrikRide 2 years ago
I think this is great. When I get done suing the scum bags that railroaded me into jail I intend to build a variant of the Larson Radax Engine that will run amazingly well on alcohol and hydrogen.
I will tune it to run on alcohol first and hydrogen second. This is because alcohol as fuel is easier to come by in large quantities.
I think that hho addition or injection is a very important aspect of future low to non polluting engines. We don't have to give up cars just dirty fuel!!
scarmenl 2 years ago
I agree. I'm sorry to hear about your circumstance. I hope you find the justice you deserve!
EletrikRide 2 years ago