Added: 5 years ago
From: jquinn9
Views: 38,911
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (77)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That's not at all what happened. Manson came during the day when Sharon's photographer was present. She did come face to face with Manson like above, but it occurred outside. The photographer said the same thing that Frykowski said. I believe the director did it this way to give it a little more suspense.

  • I don't get it. Is this a working project or was it never finished?

  • Gee that really looks like Sharon doesn't it...She's just as gorgeous...It would have been so hard for Hollywood to just 'carry on' after this dreadful crime... they have done a very good job casting...Sharon is incredible...Who is this actress?

  • the theme of the book is bs but actual events seem to be true enough, there's far too much to this whole story than would fit into a movie.

  • There's a lot of really interesting comments on this page. I do think this was a great movie, in spite of some obvious discrepancies. It does follow along with the book, very well. It all depends on if you believe Bugliosi. It is the version in that book, just like Sid and Nancy was based on Nancy's mother's estimation of their experience...both very true to the books, which is all they were asked to be. Thanks for the post. Love Jeremy in everything he does...

  • sharon was way hotter than this actress

  • woah manson is like a murderous jack sparrow!

  • its all dramatised up more for the film, but they should stick 2 the truth because i want to watch exactly how they were not some O.T.T. fairytale bull shit. sharon and the others who died deserve the truth to be told not made in2 sum sell out movie that has sum parts a bit true and others complete fake, i know they wanna make a film but i hate them adding parts that r realy crappy and fake

  • First thing they messed up on is this... I'm very obervant. The wine glasses. They never used wine glasses that large back in the 60's. Watch every movie, old show, you name it. They had very small glasses used for wine. The newer wine glasses were intruduced some time in the 90's. They should have kept an eye on that to make it much more realistic!!

  • I've never seen such plastic bullshit.

  • Is this true or just hype? I don't remember hearing about Manson and Sharon ever meeting like this.

  • @breezeman199

    I think they made this part up too. I have never heard of Manson coming to look for Melcher before the murders either.

  • @TheMagickScene

    Actually the scene was NOT made up... Charlie did come by and Sharon saw him through a screened door and asked 'who was that creepy fellow outside",,,, or so it says in the original book anyways

  • @Buckbiffley

    Oooohhh. Come to think of it...I think I have heard about what you just said.

  • @Buckbiffley It was true, because Sharon's photographer Hatami, answered the door. Hatami, in a interview, confirmed this.

  • Eu comprei um tempo atrás, só que eu emprestei pra uma pessoa que nunca mais vi. Só lembrei desse filme porque semanas atrás passou no sbt.

  • I'm from Brazil and long time I wanted to watch this movie and yesterday was the day.I movie is disturbing, a blind fanaticism that only gives me to see the goose bumps.

  • Eu sou do brasil tambem..onde posso ver esse filme???é muito forte??

    Beijos..

  • Anyone writing for Sharon/Gibby/Voytek would have had the balls to have wrote Gibby and Voytek tearing lumps out of each other and taking drugs. That is how they spent their last few weeks. Fighting and taking drugs together.

  • some say say sharon was attracted to the macabre and had some idee that this might happen.she was a smart lady after all her husband directed rosemary baby

  • This must be the new one; never saw it all.

  • oh I can't stand things like this. It's so phony. If I were an actor I would NEVER be in this picture or play any of these parts.

  • I have read A LOT of books on Manson and his followers, and one of the reasons Tex was sent was because he frequented the Cielo Drive house and was friends with Terry Melcher b4 he met Manson. The dogs were in the caretakers house, locked up, but much speculation as to why they did not hear anything going on 500 feet away. It is said that Manson visited the house AFTER the murders to "see what his children had done" which is why a lot of the testimony of the murderers didn't match the evidence

  • i still wonder how manson and watson knew the house so well. they must have been there numerous times. and where were the dogs that were on the estate?

  • Christopher, the watchdog, was in the caretaker's house.

  • From what I understand, Gibby and Fry were not that happy. She had to see a psychiatrist daily because of him and other that were going on. She was trying to get the strength up to kick him to the curb.

  • She was getting ready to leave Fry, according to the psychiatrist.

  • @lexlaw007 According to the same therapist, she was also getting ready to kick drugs but her autopsy showed that she consumed a higher volume of drugs than Voy did the night they died. Like most people in therapy, she probably lied a bit :-) I have no doubt though, that she would have made her mark in the world.

  • the song...

  • dont like the actress who plays sharon she doesnt capture her at all!

  • Losing battle...the wouldn't be able to find an actress who captured Sharon.

  • @INI eptuneaus I have to agree...she was an original.....I don't think there is an actress around who can compete Sharon........unless the other great beauties of that time bore femaleoffspring  I'm talkin about Rochel welsh, and Anne Margarate just to name a few.

  • @HOTPOT87 It's because they didn't even try with her. The night of her death, she wore no make up. She probably looked serene. In this, she's made up like some hooker.

  • Hey.. what program did you use to edit this?? Just curious, cause I do non-linear editing too..

  • final cut pro

  • Weel, yeah, it is somehow ok that documentary dramas are not 100% accurate. To make the story a little more simple. E.g. when Manson came to the house Hatami was there, a famous fotographer who took fotos of Sharon. The two were the only in the house.

    Anyway...

    I am relly looking foreward to seeing this movie..but, honestly: Sharon's character should have been much better casted. The actress doesn't even come CLOSE to her! She looks average, voice is totally different...she was a bad choice. :o(

  • Actually there were several friends at the house. I think 4 people were murdered that night.

  • Yeah, I know but I am referring to the first time Manson met Sharon Tate weeks before 9th August (5 people were killed). He wanted to see Melcher but Hatami told him that Melcher had moved out. Sharon asked who that "creepy looking guy" was.

    Sharok Hatami was a photographer, he was at her house to take photos of her. They were friends and Sharon told him that she was unhappy with Polanski because he cheated on her continuously, even while she was pregnant.

    She was close to divorce...poor girl...

  • No I don't think Hatami and Sharon were the only two in the house when Manson went there. I'm pretty sure Abigail, Frykowski, and Sebring were there as well, sitting inside. They all spent a lot of time at Sharon's house together. And it's possible he went there more than once (Tex Watson claims manson went there the night before the murders and ran into Frykowsi). So this isn't as inaccurate as you think.

  • this movie was amazing. jeremy davies pulled it out by being manson. kudos to great acting.

  • Does that family still exist anyway?

  • This is so much shit it never really happened.

  • omg very good actor, he acts just like charles manson!!!

  • jeremy davies. he's on lost right now, doing just as good a job if not better.

  • @pichikita

    He is an awesome actor...but too handsome to play Charles Manson. This actor's hair is gorgeous UNLIIKE Manson. I know this is trivial. But I had to point it out.

  • @pichikita The '76 version/performance was better.

  • Most docu-dramas are not 100% accurate. They are peiced together from several different sources.

  • did you hear the folger girl kissing upto Sharon so she can stay ther with her lover. thats how it sounded to me.

  • why would Abigail have to 'kiss up' to Sharon? She was the heiress to Folger coffee! Far richer than Sharon. She was like Paris Hilton, but only in this respect. She didn't waste all her time and money,and behave with no class. Abigail really cared about injustice and tried to do something. She was so upset about the suffering and poverty in the ghetto it had driven her nearly to a breakdown. Abigail Folger was a really good person and her death was even more tragic than Sharon's.

  • It's sad but I never hear much about the other victims; especially Abigail Folger. I have heard more about her on YouTube than anywhere. I wonder if her family had something to do with that.

    I do find it interesting that you never hear about anyone working to keep the killers in jail besides the Tates. The Folgers surely had the money to do so; I would think.

  • OK,OK, I TAKE IT BACK. i APOLOGIZE...HUMBLY APOLOGIZE. I AM SORRY IF I OFFENDED ANYONE. I AM SORRY FOR MY IGNORANCE ABOUT THE MANY GOOD THINGS ABIGAIL DID. GOD REST HER SOUL. MY CONDOLENCES TO HER FAMILY AND ALL THOSE PPL. THAT LOVED AND RESPECTED HER. I TOO RESPECT HER. IF ONLY FOR JUST BEING A HUMAN BEING. I BELIEVE WHAT HAPPENED TO HER WAS TRAGIC AND HORRIBLE. SHE DID NOT DESERVE THIS. I FEEL BAD FOR COMMENTING BEFORE THINKING. IT MAY BE THE INTERNET. BUT REAL PEOPLE SEE THESE COMMENTS.

  • No one's death was any more tragic than the other's.

  • spahn ranch dressing, i don't mean to sound depressing!

  • Does anyone know when this meeting was to take place, a few days before the murder? Sharon is obviously very pregnant. I didn't know Charlie visited the place, especially if this visit happened right before the murders. Something doesn't seem right with the timeline.

  • I honestly don't even remember this movie being on the one from 76 I do, but not this one and I dunno why.

  • Susan Atkins lied and said the reason they went to that house was to "instill fear in Terry Melcher" but Charlie already knew Melcher had moved. In fact, Charlie knew that Melcher was living in Malibu. But then, Susan said a lot of stupid things. I'm not sure if Doris Day mentioned it again, but Melcher was scared to death when it was discovered that the Manson family were the killers.

  • Is this true? I didn't know Charlie went to the house first asking for Terry Melcher. Just outta curiosity, did Terry Melcher or his MOTHER (Doris Day) ever say anything about this?

  • Charlie did go there looking for Terry and was told he didn't live there anymore. But it was during the day and he was sent to the guest house by the photographer to speak to Altobelli, the owner of the house. Altobelli had met Charlie previously thru Dennis Wilson. He thought he was no talent. The very next day, Rudy & Sharon flew to Europe. The theory is that's why CM chose this house because of the way he was treated when he was there. He was treated like the cockroach he is.

  • according to the book,newsclips,YOU are the closest katie8753. This clip is inaccurate. "Creepy" is how Sharon supposedly described him to, I forget whom, in the book. If they only put his stupid record on the market and let the public decide;we would have been able to see a lot more of beautiful,gorgeous, Sharon Tate. Someone else may have bought it. But Charlie did get the fame he wanted. Making the old Chinese proverb ring ture: "be careful what you wish for."

  • you callin me an idiot your an idiot you moron i said he sent the scum there to kill her read it before you comment dumb ass, i never said manson went there,

  • manson came face to face with sharon, knew she was preganat, and sent the scum there to murder her, he knew exactly what he was doing, he knew terry didnt live there,its all in the book helter skelter!

  • Manson didnt kill her idiot

  • Bugliosi didn't need to make them look like monsters, he could have even tried to do the opposite and the effect would have been the same.

  • Both verisons have their merits.

    This one has a lot accuracy in it.

  • somehow I dont think that Charlie was polite enough to knock........

  • charles manson did not have long hair before going in to prison

  • false

  • sean, i agree with you 1976 helter skelter, was far better then this, steve railsback gives a great portrayal of manson,so much more intelligent, details of how and why it happened. this is just murder, which everyone is fasinated with seeing sharon being stabbed to death

  • Terry,Terry,Terry

  • THIS IS THE SHITTY NEW VERSION. The late 70s version is MILES AND MILES BETTER. THIS ONE IS CRAP.

  • someone needs to upload the movie

  • The quality is in the physical details.

    Davies studied for the part for over a year

  • Please, please..!! PUT IT...

  • the murders are the climax of the entire movie. please do your best to post it.

  • Did they show Sharon Tate's death

  • yes

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more