Added: 4 years ago
From: Conza88
Views: 278,294
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5,311)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ron Paul 2012. This guy is what Obama hoped to be, but even better than before because he does what is right for AMERICA and it's PEOPLE. Not for himself, the government's best interest, or just to get re-elected once more.

    Hopefully, he raised a good son so when Ron is gone, his son can follow through and bring fresh air to this smugged-up nation.

  • Lol, this should be updated for the 2012 election!

  • non-bias?

  • Ron Paul Supporters are having to much fun!

  • Ron Paul vs Obama 2012!!!

  • RON PAUL 2012 Whether your republican or democrat! he is a true Patriot

  • MoRon Paul 2012!

    Why would anyone compare "MoRon Paul 2012" to Obama? MoRon Paul 2102 won't win the nomination and won't face Obama. Anyways, "MoRon Paul 2012" is a clownish figure, why would a sane person vote for him?

  • @tr2006x Sad.

  • dumbest video ive seen. give the man a chance, come on he took over from bush, it takes time to get things right again.

  • @bajer111 He's had 1 term to do it. That sounds like a chance to me.

  • @bajer111 We have, but if this chance wasn't good enough for you let's do a few case studies on socialism: 1. Europe 2. Soviet Russia 3. Eastern Europe 4. Cuba 5. North Korea

    Now let's do a few case studies on free market capitalism: 1. America under Reagan 2. America before the creation of the Fed 3. Hong Kong

    Socialism doesn't work, and neither does your "moderate" Keynesianism. Only true free market capitalism can save us.

  • @d3ltadrive you don't know what your talking about :) you would like to, but you dont. true free market capitalism brought the us to the current state. your state owe about 15.000.000.000.000 $ (almost doubled since 2000), and and adds to the debt issuing about 1 billion $ worth of bonds a day. you can call europe socialism as much as you want, but I still prefer to live in here in denmark.

  • @bajer111 That's called National Socialism dipshit. The government doesn't borrow money because it only protects the constitution in true free market capitalism. You know how much inflation we had before 1913, 0%. You know how much we've had after, a lot. It's not a coincidence that the Federal Reserve act, Income tax act, and Corporations act, were all signed in the same year in secret bills not approved by congress. We have fascism.

  • @d3ltadrive whats called national socialism? look I dont care how much you scream and shout like a neglectet 5 year old kid, facts are that the us is on its way down, and the only thing floating the boat right now is your military, which is still superior. maybe not for long, but still. I think obama is the man to save your country, you dont, and thats fine. youre clearly not a person to argue with.

  • @bajer111 Obama fucked things up. Obama thinks that we'll get out of debt by spending more then we're making, that is clear incompetence. Obama is an idiot.

  • @d3ltadrive More than Bush? I mean, did he spend more than Bush? About incompetence and idiocy - it's better to avoid any discussion :)))

    MoRon Paul 2012!

  • @tr2006x

    I just looked up your question, and it seems they may be even more or less. Bush sucked, but so does Obama. To keep spending during a recession is purely idiotic.

  • @BLawr3nce Spending during recession is a lesson from 1929. How much did the wars in Afg and Irak cost? That is wasted money. Bailouts started with Bush. Obama had good advice and intuition to bail out GM. The economy grew continually since Obama took over. I don't think that he has a great merit for that, but he could do a lot of damage (like others did in 1929). If I borrow to live another day or simply because I don't have enough money to pay for education, it's not bad at all.

  • @d3ltadrive In 1913 people used to die at 50, live a brutish life working 12 hours a day in fields starting from 5, no education, no medical care, no Internet, no iphone, etc, etc etc. You compare apples and oranges or rather apples and fish. 2-3% annual inflation is the last of my worries. BTW, back then physics was much simpler than it is today, because was much less of it :) National Socialism? Get serious! Having a sense of proportions is critical in understanding the world correctly.

  • @tr2006x In some parts of the country, yes, but that's because technology and medicine has improved much since then. By the way of course physics are much more advanced today science progresses over time idiot. Also our economic system matches the dictionary definition of national socialism so you can fuck off and take your uninformed rhetoric elsewhere.

  • @d3ltadrive you just agreed with me :)

    MoRon Paul 2012!

  • The sound effects make this biased right off the bat.

  • Obama has no ideals at all. Obama is a liar and manipulator, just like his father Karl Marx.

  • I think its the same thing all over again. Obama had his ideals when entering into office, Change and Bipartisan politics, away with Red Vs Blue. But that office seemed to conflict with his ideals, to his disadvantage, things are not that simple. I would like to see Obama with Ron Paul in office, that's an idea I would bank on.

  • YEY!

  • EVERYTHING DR PAUL IS SAYING TRUE BUT PROBLEM IS STUPID AMERICANS DONT UNDERSTAND, DR PAUL SUPPOSE TO BE NO1 IN NEW HAMPSHIRE AND IOWA VOTE, AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE MAKING MISTAKE BY SAME PEOPLE LIKE SENIOR AND JUNIOR BUSH WHO ENDORSE MITT ROMNEY WHO(WHO ARE "---ROTHSCHILD--" PUPPETS) WANTS ANOTHER WAR AGAINST IRAN BULLSHIT.................PLZ SAVE USA SAVE THE WORLD AND SAVE MUSLIMS THEY ARE NOT ENEMY OFAMERICANS...................­...VOTE FOR DR RON PAUL 2012.SAVE US FROM ROTHSCHILD

  • i would rather see Obama work WITH Ron Paul. screw this blue vs. red horse-shit that blocks anything from getting accomplished in this country.

  • Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • almost cute

  • @evillbert81, there is not a single troop in Iraq, there is security at the Embassy, but there are no soldiers in the country of Iraq. Your flat-out wrong when you claim "troops are deployed in Iraq" and as for "Obama taking credit", i see his approval rating at 43%, so people must not be absorbing the "Obama Lie". What's happening is, your getting desperate, you know will slaughter these bafoon candidates ya'll put out there, so your going for the kitchen sink attack, it won't work.

  • @Conza88

    Remake this please, with an equally flattering pic of Obama so it doesnt appear biased, then put a Ron Paul 2012 pic at the end. With those 2 things it will definately be a better campaign support tool and I would totally link it all over

  • I actually want both of them to compete each other. They are both good. It is just that If Bush didn't put us through this mess maybe Obama could have done what he wanted to. Ron Paul is good to. But if Ron loses to Mitt Romney then I would vote for Obama

  • still its nice to have hope that someone will wont get bought out or go back on their word in office

  • 4 years later, this video is still true.

  • RON PAUL 2012

  • I can't believe I bought obamas lies in the first place haha Go RON PAUL

  • @TexansToast it's always the same. no matter who gets picked. at this point it would be a miracle for anyone to get elected and actually do everything that they promise.

  • @TexansToast I saw through that scammer and face palmed at the rest of the nation

  • @TexansToast dude your from Texas you never bought his lies.

  • @TexansToast Come on, he was Slick Rick without the Gold neckless and gold rings, and the Adidas shoes. And this isn't directly towards you, but people are so mindless to fall for this little slogan of "Change you can believe in". He stole that from John McCain.

  • LOL ... So TRUE!! :D

  • yeah this is totally non biased lol

  • I VOTED FOR OBAMA IM A DEMOCRAT

    THIS TIME IM VOTING FOR RON PAUL

    RON PAUL 2012

  • Paul wins via being white.

  • Ron Paul is the champion of Freedom! Ron Paul 2012

  • I think Ron Paul and Obama should work together. Fuck of this two-party-system. Fuck of FED. Fuck of the miserable Bush-years. Obama brought change and Paul will bring freedom.

  • @Ashkalan you really do not understand politics at all haha. You are seeing a large range of political ideas in very simplistic ideas. All the "change" Obama has brought has the potential to violate one's freedom. A government based on preserving freedom cannot "work together" with a Keynesian government. Change and Freedom contradict each other in these simplistic terms.

  • @creat2ful I assume you´re from the USA? Maybe thatswhy people like you don´t understand that fighting against Fed and be in favor of health insurance for every citizen must not be a contradiction. We in Europe enjoy universal health care and NO ONE here can understand why so many americans are against it. it just makes no sense!

    Both, Obama and Paul, have their points. Together they would be invincible.

  • @Ashkalan That's why Europe is near a depression again. And we're following the same path by helping other countries out and not focusing on ourselves first.

  • As a presidential candidate its easy to say to do things like say ill end the war, i voted this i voted that but when you become president. You know everything about the topic, you are introduced to top secret information. Would top secret/classified information change your decision? UHHH YES. Presidents have more knowledge than presidential candidate due to information access.

  • Conservatives brains could not function without cherry-picked fact checking, or base-less assumptions and generalizations. LOL Not even going to bother pointing out how conveniently cherry-picked and spun the information in this video is for Ron Paul since Dr. "let em die" has zero chance of even becoming the Repuklican nominee for President anyway. LOL

  • @bigge525 He was around before welfare and healthcare as a doctor. You really think he let people die?? He delivered 4,000 babies. You think all of them were paid for?!?! What the hell!

  • Obama wasn't in congress when the patriot act was signed. So he couldn't have voted against it. 

  • @alchased True but in 2011 may 26 he did sign a 3 year extension of the Patriot Act so he is clearly or it

  • Comment removed

  • @alchased He extended it, and then he signed the NDAA into law. Bill of Rights - gone.

  • @alchased Yeah instead he signed the NDAA act which repeals the fourth amendment.

  • @evilbert81 5th and 14th amendments. The patriot act destroys the 4th

  • Evergreen.

  • "An attempted non-biased...." Nice attempt.

  • Hum, don't get me wrong, I think Ron Paul is the man and he should be the president but this video is straight propaganda. I mean even if the statements are right, the hole montage is way too...tendentious no?

    Anyway go paul go

  • Great video! I am unsure as to why some people say that Ron Pauls views are kooky, his voting record shows that his views are in line with most americans, unlike politicians like Obama who say one thing, then do another.

  • turns out he didnt change jack shit, he likes it just the way it was going, what a lying prick

    RON PAUL 2012

  • Mrdust1981, all you need to do is type your search in YouTube and you'll see the congressional speeches you say don't exist. It would have taken less time to look that it did for you to post your misinformed rant.

  • @MrLibertyMedic Thank you. They have the entire internet at their finger tips and yet they say "Show me".

  • @WashingtonOJefferson, so your new excuse is "contractors" or "mercenaries" if Obama keeps troops in afghanistan you call him "Bush 2.0" but if he gets our troops out of iraq you say "don't drink the koolaid, we got mercenaries over there". I think your desperation speaks for itself. BTW, show me a video of Ron Paul shitting on Bush for starting these wars, especially iraq, he says impeach bill clinton for 98 bomb campaign, but when bush kills 100,000+ civilians, Ron Paul said nothing, typical.

  • @MrDust1981 Bush is the only reason the troops were recalled back in Dec '11. The Bush-Maliki agreement MADE the troops leave. Obama's taking credit for it. He's lying.

  • To make this non-biased, you could have used a more flattering picture of Obama. I agree with the message, though. Obama's a sell out.

  • Comment removed

  • Obama brought them home though..... ?

  • The last U.S. combat troops rolled out of Iraq on Dec. 18, ending almost nine years of war.

    Almost 4,500 U.S. personnel were killed and about 32,000 were wounded in the conflict. The war cost the U.S. more than $800 billion.

    ---As cited by Bloomberg---

  • @HaRmNoNe3 Unfortunately, 17,000 "private contractors" (i.e. Mercenaries) were just deployed TO Iraq. Don't drink that koolaid. There's only 1 way to end the wars... and i think you know what needs to be done.

    -

    As cited by Ron Paul during the debates.

  • @HaRmNoNe3 We're still all over the middle-east and Iraq. Troops are still deployed in Iraq. The majority is gone.

  • @HaRmNoNe3 He had to. Bush had signed the U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement to remove all troops by 2011.

  • @HaRmNoNe3 Bush-Maliki agreement brought our troops home, not Obama. Look it up please.

  • Does anybody know if he wants to run in the 2016 election if he loses? 

  • 553 people aren't able to read. Poor guys.

  • Yes dismantle the federal reserve!

    

  • You are against healthcare for all because doctors will be over worked? Lmao really? What kind of logic is that... Imo doctors shouldn't be the highest paid.. teachers should be..

  • Being a doctor does not mean you can fix the healthcare system. I know plenty of doctors who don't have a clue how healthcare funding etc. actually works. And if they did and ran for office on that platform, that wouldn't really speak for them, since that would probably mean they have a private interest in changing it to their will.

  • @SSTTEEAALLTTHH Healthcare reform means this exactly...More demand for doctors and nurses, less pay, and more UNQUALIFIED people in the medical field...There are already way too many unqualified nurses out there that I have seen.

  • @MrMoBidnizz

    I spent a lot of time in Europe (Britain and Sweden) while studying, and I've yet to see any statistic regarding unqualified nurses in those countries. Doctors there were doing quite, well seeing the rides they went around in and the size f their houses. Also, in most Western European countries, doctors (overall, M.D. less than specialists of course etc.) are still the highest paid private professions, regardless of the way healthcare is organized.

  • @SSTTEEAALLTTHH the way i look at it is that there will be less Doctor/Patient relationships because the doctors will be vastly over worked than they are now. I just think the Health Insurance companies THEMSELVES need to be fixed.. I dont think the whole medical profession/industry needs to be changed...Just the insurance companies who refuse to cover the people who have chronic ailments.

  • Why isnt "I oppose gay marriage" / "I do not" up there? Why isnt "I oppose our allies." / "I do not" up there?

  • Obama 2012.

  • @theSicilianToe Good luck with that, you will certainly need it should Ron Paul become the Republican nominee. If the Grinch or Snake becomes nominee, then yes, Obama 2012.

  • @TheKeeper421 Why would you vote Obama again if Paul loses? Are you an idiot? Any GOP is better than Obama. Obama fucked this country up badly. If you listen to educated people like Mark Levin, you would know why your views are messed up.

  • @gamefreak1000000

    EDUCATED LIKE MARK LEVIN ?!?!?!?!?!

    oh god

    we are in deep shit now

    

  • @madtrade He's more educated than any politician in office. More educated than Ron Paul if I may ask and he would be a much better president than Paul could ever hope to be. Unfortunately, you ignorant masses just don't understand the true meaning of conservatism and if there is such a thing as neoconservatives, then it would be you guys since you guys give conservatism a whole other meaning.

    Oh yeah, he was Ronald Reagan's adviser when he was in power. The more you fools know.

  • @gamefreak1000000 That is party politics. You could tag a turd sandwich as GOP and people would vote for it before Obama. Besides, if you think it's solely Obama's fault, you're misguided. Obama wasn't even in office when the economy took it's first downfalls. George W. Bush was, and he's a Republican. It's not even entirely his fault though. No one person has the blame for the entire economy's collapse.

  • @TheKeeper421

    I'm really glad that there are people out there that aren't completely naive about this political blame-game. :)

  • this one is better: /watch?v=nZOFqfJtX_M

  • Can we update this bad boy and get Ron Paul 2011?????

  • @MrMoBidnizz ..2012

  • @Nfinety8 Oh man....I feel like an idiot now...I cant believe I put 2011......What a schmuck I am.

  • @MrMoBidnizz Its alright, your heart was in the right place.

  • obama changed our national debt, thats about it

  • I'm a doctor i understand the health care system WTF, so if im an engineer does that mean i know how to build a large hadron collider

  • @Mrinebriation Yeah, when you're in an institution for so many years you have a level of credibility and insight as a result. He's dealt with healthcare and has an intimate knowledge of it. Your example is a bit outlandish, since that has nothing to do with the knowledge of policy.

  • @Surrealbeliefs being a doctor has nothing to do with policy, you can say because he is a congressman he knows policy but that gives the same level of credibility to all congressman.

  • LOL!

  • Let's make it in 2012. Vote Ron Paul for president

  • @Gestotamoseke, wtf does any of your comment have to do with mine? i didn't mention pharmaceutical drugs, you must be hitting the hallucinogen drugs, and you wanna talk standing up to corporatist fraud and corruption? Ron Paul will say that in the debate and primary, but let him get into office, he'll be the same puppet as every other president, including the current one. Obama is not a great pres, but he shows some genuine feeling of compassion to the poor and got some big things done.

  • @MrDust1981 His entire legacy in politics isn't attacked or questioned in debates, because people recognize his integrity. I highly doubt a man who has no skeletons to be unearthed, would suddenly do a 360 while in office. Even if you dislike him, at least recognize his authencity like the other candidates have. What compassion? The guy requires a teleprompter to be coherent. Small band-aids on big wounds is a nice short term thought, but does nothing to rectify our current economic problems.

  • Seeing how the troops are leaving iraq in about 2 weeks and theres been no invasion of iran whatsoever, i feel this video upload is pretty absurd and falls under the old "obama derangement syndrome" partisan routine. I mean you think the president could snap 300,000 troops out of an invaded country with no stability on jan 21 2009? Just keep your obama bashing going, put him against paul in a debate and find out if your delusional, going senile paul can handle our president.

  • @MrDust1981

    Obama would get his ass handed to him.

    Obama is too much of a pussy to take a stance on civil liberties - and he's too much of a pussy to stand up to bureaucrats. You want to talk about a war? over 750,000 people die A YEAR from pharmaceutical drugs - LEGAL DRUGS - and politicians get paid to turn the other way - that's what regulating a system does - people with money make the laws - and it's not even a talking point hmm... i wonder why?

  • @MrDust1981  Why are they accusing Iran of helping with 9/11 with absolutely no evidence?

  • Ron Paul = the ONLY guy who's gotta do it!

    ...beat Obama & restore America with the help of THE PEOPLE!

  • The mere fact that most people will not go beyond what they are fed on the 6 oclock news is the reason why Ron Paul doesnt stand a chance of winning, I hate to burst anyone's bubble but Obama and his planners are relying on this fact. Obama won't need to know any of the Constitutional law in which he holds a degree in, he'll just put out nice soundbites and distort truths on the news and we'll buy it. The Ron Paul supporter is more educated and worldly, in other words- a minority faction.

  • most of the people that dont want Ron Paul to win are people that are dependant on the government, dependancy is a form of slavery, ron isnt saying fuck you to the poor man he's saying fuck you to the lazy fucks that leech off the system, and for anyone that truely understands the federal reserve knows it's a bad thing and easilly taken advantage of ,the fed prints money at will which creates inflation, not too mention we pay for the fed to bail out the greedy fucks that run the banks. Wake up

  • They're both fascists. We need a Democratic Socialist like Nader, Kucinich or Brian Moore. Anyway, we need to focus more on our Congressional leaders than the President. They're the ones with the power to send us into useless wars and make or end good and bad laws. People obsess too much on the Presidency.

  • @73849309378 But the president controls the military, that's why the president has another title called, Commander in Chief.

  • ALSO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RON PAUL AND PRESIDENT OBAMA IS PRESIDENT OBAMA WILL BE PRESIDENT IN 2012 AND RON PAUL WON'T BE ! OOH , I JUST SAW RON PAUL'S STAT HE'S ALL THE WAY UP TO 8% OF REPUBLICANS WHICH IS ABOUT 2% OR LESS OF ALL AMERICANS . HE'S GETTIN THERE ! I THINK HE SHOULD BACK OFF ON SENIORS AND THE POOR AND HELP AMERICANS INSTEAD OF HURTING AMERICANS AND MAYBE AMERICANS WILL OVERLOOK THAT HE IS 76 YEARS OLD !

  • RON PAUL . I WILL VOTE TO REPEAL THE LAW THAT SAYS CHILDREN WITH PREEXISTING CONDITIONS WILL BE COVERED . OBAMA: I WROTE THE LAW . RON PAUL . I WANT TO ELIMINATE THE MINIMUM WAGE . OBAMA : I AM FIGHTING FOR JOBS . RON PAUL : MY SEGREGATION VIEWS ARE QUESTIONABLE . OBAMA , I AM BI RACIAL SO CMON . RON PAUL : I AM VERY VERY OLD ! OBAMA I'M 48 YRS OLD . RON PAUL : THE BUSH TAX CUTS STAYS AND I WILL RIP OFF SENIORS AND THE POOR . OBAMA : REPEAL BUSH TAX CUTS AND PROTECTS SENIORS AND THE POOR .

  • @weetoy69 what are you smoking and where can i get some?!

  • non-bias my butthole.

  • Believe it or not, this gives Obama more credit than he deserves. He didn't actually vote against Iraq, he wasn't a Senator at the time.

  • Australia calling! Americans vote for Ron Paul!! We dont want troops in Australia to start war with China!

  • @MrMesha22 bloody oath!!

  • @MrMesha22 Americans will never start a war with China. Most Americans know China would kick our ass.

  • @DarkePacific Most Americans doesn't equal most Congressmen. That's why only 9% of the people support the current Congress.

  • @MrMesha22 Your support is appreciated, friend. We don't want that either.

  • @MrMesha22 You are just another country we are unnecessarily adding on our list of places our military can be...SO SORRY...if it were my choice they'd all be home.

  • @MrMesha22 Who in hell wants to start a war with China?? Fuck you and your Australian accent.

  • Americans, pay attention! Europe calling!

    PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.

    IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !

    WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere

  • My problem with Ron Paul, say he should run against Obama is that I don't agree with cutting out all federal programs especially education, social security, and welfare. Are children not to be educated for those who can't afford private school? Will be forced to be part of a religion and if not and we lose our home and job we then live under bridges? Can we really go back? And if congress doesn't support Ron Paul if he should be POTUS, nothing's going to happen anyway.

  • You forgot to put that Paul voted for legislation that wouldn't allow a child born in the U.S. with illegal parents to be a citizen. I thought he was supposed to be a strong follower of the Constitution. He also wants to get rid of welfare programs and student aid. In what ways is that good? Basically telling the poor man to go fuck himself. Most people that are for Paul are just pot heads and conspiracy nuts.

  • @erik3423 yeah well if there's no incentive to do good for yourself everybody will be a lazy slob because there's no difference in benefits. Same with healthcare; if there's no incentive to be healthy, most people will become fat slobs with many health problems and healthcare will be rationed like in Canada or worse. Churches have historically helped, and individual people are welcome to do all they can to help. what's wrong is pointing a gun at people's head [government] and forcing them to do

  • One difference btwn Mr. Paul & Master O'Bomb'ya is that Barack is extremely ugly inside and out. He's an embarrassment to Muslims & to the U.S. at large. He's a terrible euphemism for "leader" & a war-mongering robot for the banksters. All in All, he's "Bush In Black."

  • @evernetherall But he is not muslim lol?

  • Before the IRS they used giant tariffs. That's not really any different than any other sort of tax because it makes prices go up, just further away from the super market.

  • Abolish IRS? Dismantle Federal Reserve? LOL, I'm all for the end of restrictive regulation and increased disposable income but are you kidding me? Those are NOT good things for this country... In fact, I think the US population should be clamoring FOR austerity taxes and decreased spending. Also, I agree that policing the world is wrong but we ARE the hegemonic nation - other nations expect solutions... and we wouldn't survive if we ticked them off.

  • RON PAUL 4EVER

  • And it's gotten much worse since he won the election....

    Ron Paul 2012

  • I don't think abolishing the IRS and ending the fed is a practical plan. Nevertheless, Ron Paul stands heads and shoulders above all the other candidates. He is our best hope, indeed our only hope for the future. I don't buy the argument that we need 535 Ron Pauls in congress. Better a good president and a bad congress than a bad president and a bad congress.

  • Cool, unbiased my ass.

  • IF YOU'RE SWITCHING PARTIES TO VOTE FOR RON PAUL:

    You need to switch parties 3 months ahead of the primary OR YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE.

    If you want to vote for Ron Paul in the primary, YOU HAVE TO BE REGISTERED AS A REPUBLICAN or you will not be allowed to vote.

    PLEASE DO NOT WAIT ANOTHER SECOND

    Switch now if you are a democrat or independent or you will not be allowed to vote in the primary. IF DR PAUL LOSES PRIMARY, NO ELECTION.

    DO IT NOW PEOPLE! RESTORE AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • the majority of Americans are on government welfare in one form or another. Nobody wants cuts to their pet programs. So though Ron Paul is right and he would be the best person to run this country......America just ain't up to it

  • @emantabrizi A federal tax on wages of the Citizens is just plain WRONG (and likely fraudulently ratified). I'm more than fine with paying State tax for essential government functions. However, the federal government has grown out of constitutional control and is now handling affairs of the States. This is NOT how our country was setup. Our founding fathers would be ashamed. Register as Republican and vote for Ron Paul in 2012. He is the modern-day Thomas Jefferson.

  • @MrVernam ... You have no idea what our founding fathers wanted any more than I do. Be serious. I like Ron Paul, but unless you fill Congress with 535 Ron Pauls, none of those changes will occur. President Obama wanted to change a lot of things, as well, but he learned the hard way that Congress ultimately has the final say.

  • The vast majority of Income tax pays off the interest that the Govt owes to the FED

  • Ron Paul: 10000000

    Barack: 0

  • @kaminoneh

    Tell me what benefit do you have with with IRS?

  • @kaminoneh IT'S OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAND

  • how the hell do you think dissolving the irs will accomplish anything? Goodness fucking gracious, some of you ron paul minions will literally brush off all the purely evil shit he wants to do because he says "end the wars, and legalize drugs" SHIT.

  • @TheSoleTop The IRS was set up right after the Federal Reserve in 1913. That should turn light bulbs in your head and start asking yourself what was the purpose of a federal income tax(unconstitutional and never ratified) after the country was in existence for 150 years without one. The federal reserve has the power to print money at will and the IRS just does the dirty work of forcing the citizens to pay up whatever the govt deems fair for you to keep and for them to spend. Read a book..

  • @vincentca2004 ... What was the purpose of the federal income tax? Would YOU want to live in the United States prior to the income tax? Would YOU want to piss in a bucket instead of using a toilet? Would YOU want to drive on a dirt road instead of a highway? The income tax is what built this country. The income tax has provided us with infrastructure and military protection. Just because corruption has infiltrated the system doesn't mean we should simply get rid of the system altogether.

  • @emantabrizi

    Taxation is theft, purely and simply, even though it is theft on a grand and colossal scale which no acknowledged criminals could hope to match. It is a compulsory seizure of the property of the State's inhabitants, or subjects. Without an income tax, that money would go back into the hands of the PEOPLE, and thus, the economy. This idea that government has to regulate everything in order for a country to prosper is ridiculous.

  • @hXcDiedWithHitler ... Okay, then how do you suggest we pay for roads, schools, law enforcement, firefighters, sewer systems, etc.? You want to privatize EVERYTHING?

  • @emantabrizi

    Did I say I want to privatize everything? No. I am in favor of minarchism, which states that the only legitimate function is the protection of individuals from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud, and the only legitimate governmental institutions are the military, police, and courts. It also includes fire departments, prisons, the executive, and legislatures as legitimate government functions. I believe taxation is morally wrong and should be voluntary.

  • @hXcDiedWithHitler ... I'll ask the question again: how do you intend to pay for those "legitimate governmental functions" without a system of taxation?

  • @emantabrizi

    Maybe you skipped over the last part of my post, where I said taxation should be voluntary. If there wasn't not a set income tax, people would be getting back 30-60% more of their actual income, and would be more willing to donate to things such as law enforcement and what have you. It is scientifically proven that when things are voluntary and less restrictions are placed on the people, they act much more altruistically.

    Also, roads can be privatized: tinyurl(dot)com /d5pjkkq