Added: 4 years ago
From: joerogandotnet
Views: 381,835
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,521)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If they went to the moon in 69 why hasnt it happened ever again? Technology has increased exponentially since then. the Japanese or Europeans or anyone should have tried.

  • @daniel987878

    We did go back, 5 times. We haven't returned since Apollo 17 because NASA's budget was slashed during the Apollo program hence killing Apollo 18,19 and 20. This is a fact, not some conspiracy.

    Why is no country going now? Cost–benefit analysis. It is too expensive and too dangerous compared to what they would get out of it. The US did it for political reasons, to beat the Soviets during the cold war as an alternative to war itself.

  • @3KS26

    Cost benefit my ass. It would cost virtually fuck all to replicate today what was done in 69. Chinese military technology for example is far beyond America in 69 if this is such an easy feat the Chinese definetely would want to do it to boost their standing. I get a feeling even today it may be almost impossible to travel to the moon.

    It seems to me like the moon thing happened to keep the bullshit patriotism going and hence support for wars and the like.

  • @daniel987878

    The Apollo program employed 400,000 people and tied up 5% of the budget thus contrary to your belief, very costly. All I can advise is to do your own research before making such erroneous assumptions. There is plenty of evidence to support the Apollo moon landing yet not 1 piece of evidence to support that it was a hoax. The entire academic and scientific community stands behind Apollo world wide for a reason.

  • @3KS26 It did in 1969. But the technology base is so much higher now than in 69. It wouldnt even cost a fraction of what it did in 69 and for a command economy like china it should be relatively easy to get done or at least attempt.

  • @daniel987878

    Neither you or me are able to answer this question ; ) Why don't you conduct some research by writing a few emails to the Chinese space program and ask them why they aren't going to the moon. It could make an interesting project.

  • @3KS26 Governments are usually full of bullshit. It would likely just be a waste of time.

  • Comment removed

  • @daniel987878 Phase 1 - Orbital Mission (Reconnaissance of possible landing spots) Chang'e 1 - 2007 Chang'e 2 - 2010 Phase 2 - Soft lander rover (Observation of landing sites) Chang'e 3 - 2013 Chang'e 4 - 2013 Phase 3 - Automated sample return (Data and environmental collection / lunar launch) Chang'e 5 - 2017 Phase 4 - Manned landing 2025 They are doing it step by step and are working on the heavy payload rockets which take 7 or so years to build.
  • @3KS26Years ago the US gov said it would go to Mars by about 1990.

  • @daniel987878

    And then they cut NASA's budget thus making it impossible. The one thing the Chinese have is cash and lots of it ; )

    Anyways the Chinese already completed the first phase of their Moon mission, lets sit back and see what happens.

  • @3KS26 Yeah lets sit back and wait. I think the Chinese wont do it but I may be wrong. Time will reveal the truth whether US went to moon or not. Im leaning towards the moon thing as a fake PR exercise to get people to have more faith in the US gov.

  • Comment removed

  • I did find this:

    watch?v=nptoBJazdyA

    he finishes off saying "there are places to go beyond belief"

    he is clearly emotional and the speech is cryptic but I am not sure what to read in to it

  • Comment removed

  • "there are great ideas undiscovered", "breakthroughs available to those who can remove one of truths protective layers" - Neil Armstrong

    The moon was probably full of aliens. He was so afraid to tell everyone.

  • Apollo 11 wasn't the 11th try to getting at the moon. But they're might have been other tries before Apollo 11. NASA just added a number to trick the public. Exactly how they did with SEAL Team 6. There isn't 6 SEAL teams. They just put the number 6 to fool the enemies.

  • you know you tube has really changed the media. I would have never questioned the moon landing to be fake, I guess we will all know when we land on the moon with high quality cameras. Maybe they have landed on the moon again yet they never showed to public to protect 1969. If it was fake, it could be true, however.... if it was fake... WOW what a huge lie to live with, I could never do that.

  • He specifically said "one" of truth's protective layers, he's being direct about something in particular with a stiff upper lip.

  • its only when you read some of the comments on YT you think,are some of these people actually walking the streets without supervision.

  • Maybe we can all discuss this some other time ... when we all go to heaven and sit around on white puffy clouds, eating ice cream with chocolate syrup.

  • Truths protective layers: New World Order

  • Search this: A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon Part 1

  • Thats It? Wow... Whopping Conspiracy thread right there... NOT !

  • So what do you think he means by removing "one of truths' protective layers"?

  • @pshaw951 Science, Unlike Religion, actually has to prove what it is talking about. Being that that is much more difficult, he only meant that science has to peel back the layers of resistance to the truth to get at the truth. Like the Catholic church denying that the world is round... like those who say we never went to the moon, etc.

  • @intrptr I'm not so sure it was as shallow as a fight between science and religion. It's interesting hearing the different perspectives on this. To me "truth's protective layers" means simply the current cultural conditioning of thought. Furthermore, man's ideas are locked in time and the truth is always being rediscovered only to be rediscovered at another time in space. Just another perspective...

  • @pshaw951 "current cultural conditioning of thought"---- Usually as interpreted by religious authority... which is very historically "shallow". Like the world was made in 6 days and angels have bird wings , harps, halos and long white gowns. Jesus was white, etc. Laughable...

  • @intrptr All I'm getting at is man creates concepts for himself to use until they are no longer relevant to new input and even then you have people holding on to "old" ideas, ie: mythical traditions, religious traditions, cultural heritage, etc. Truth's protective layers is more of a unbias actuality than saying that science or religion is going to give you all the answers. We already see that science is having to dive into metaphysics to explain some of the quantum reality they are exploring.

  • @pshaw951 he means the NWO, the same guys who controll mass media and faked 9/11

  • @barthoedemaker It's interesting hearing the different perspectives on this. To me "truth's protective layers" means simply the current cultural conditioning of thought. Furthermore, man's ideas are locked in time and the truth is always being rediscovered only to be rediscovered at another time in space.

  • Christ there is nothing odd about the line. It is the metaphoric reality. mankind is constantly trying to remove "truths protective layers". Well spoken and thoughtful from a quiet man who has taken giant steps.

  • @quintessential37

    Agree entirely. These hoaxies look for conspiracy in everything. Truths protective layer could mean anything, these days probably a reference to the will of a nation to cross new horizons or maybe the economy itself, given the huge cost. It was an intellectual comment intended to make people think, not a secret message aimed at YouTube conspiracy theorists who do not even have the brains to educate themselves on the bits they think did happen.

  • Watch the whole speech instead of this clip. There is only one line that is kind of 'odd' out of an entire speech. It means nothing and to think otherwise is foolish.

  • @pimpymcdougall

    It was a common tactic by the guy that paid this third rate english actress to narrate this. Like most of his rubbish if you take all the bits he has presented out of context and show them in their true context it tell a very different story.

    Percy, Sebral, Kaysing and their ilk are not mistaken seekers of truth ..... they are outright frauds making a lot of money.

  • @pimpymcdougall I think otherwise, so I'm a fool right?

    You superiority is clear, your brain owned mine thousand times, you are a genius and your argument is so powerful, I'm speechless

    People should call you god and claim you to the throne of all human population for your open mind and your pure judgment

  • @WayofLiving1 Correct on all counts.

  • jay weidner made a good point that NOTHING in technology works on the first try. therefore to expect that a complex operation of going 240,000 miles to the moon and back on the first try without a glitch, is totally BS and absurd and an insult to our intelligence.

  • @TruthandPassion You think Apollo 11 was the "first try"? Have a guess what that "11" means...

  • Comment removed

  • @arobekie Actually, 11 was the third try going to the moon (after 8 and 10), so you win nothing.

  • Comment removed

  • @arobekie Are you really that fucking stupid? I am well aware of the Apollo programme and what went into the moon landings, so I don't need further education, thank you very much. I think you have totally missed my point, and unless you can re-read it and understand it, it's a bit pointless trying to discuss it with you.

  • Comment removed

  • @arobekie Ah, you ARE stupid then. All "11" means is that they didn't attempt to land on the moon on the first try.  Oh, and that's highly original with the sheep thing. Did you think of that all by yourself? I wish I was as witty as you. Prick.

  • Comment removed

  • @TruthandPassion

    Jesus kid the Apollo 11 was not "the first try" but the culmination of 9 years of development and space flights.

    Try to think a little harder next time.

  • @TruthandPassion the fact that you thought it was the first try is an insult to YOUR intelligence.

  • @TruthandPassion Don't group your intelligence in with ours if you think Apollo 11 was the first try. Apollo 1 was the ultimate in glitches as it killed all three crew members.

  • @TruthandPassion This was in no way a first try. Many satellites were first put up, then men were put in space flights (after testing on animals), then unmanned spacecrafts were used, then they sent 11 (apollo 11) missions to the moon, this was the FIRST to succeed.

  • "One of Truth's protective layers."

    ^Huge.

  • I saw Transformers 3. Yep there's aliens up there. lol

  • They never went to the moon, it was a hoax

  • @iconoclast911 retard

  • What is cryptic about what Neil Armstrong says? I don't get it.

  • @bujin1977 youre probably 12 then

  • @LibertyPrimeV1 Or maybe I'm just not a conspiracy nutjob who looks for anything that might possibly back up an idea. There is nothing cryptic in Armstrong's response.

  • There are 2 separate conspiracies involved here....

    Its a conspiracy within a conspiracy and he is crying because of what he knows!!!

  • @MrChiptatum really?? you got nine lives like a cat..you're still breathing..the way your mouth froths even a hired 14 year old mexican girl killer from drug cartel wont miss you..you forgot to mentioned these mexican drug cartels are best friends of them you're referring to in your messge right male nagger?

  • @baredwin LMFAO..WOT A 14YR OLD MEXICAN GIRL HAVE TO DO WITH THE FABRICATED MOON LANDING...GET A JOB IN KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN YOU SMURF...BEFORE I COME PUT YOU DOWN LIKE A BAD HABIT..NO MOON LANDING EVER TOOK PLACE ALLLLLLLLLLLLL FUCKING LIES BY THE ZIONIST NEOCOMS AND ISRAELI FUCKERS

  • Of course it was fuking fake. Wake the F up. If you don't know now after 911 that all of this is BS you never will.

  • remove thruth protective layers?

  • He's depressed because it was FAKE

  • HAHAHAH all these comments are funny. I'm still amazed with intercontinental travel. Aviation is great, I always wanted to pretend fly somewhere for special attention and then fund my expensive cover up.

  • NEIL ARMSTRONG AND THE LIES AND DECEPTION'S PERPETRATED BY THE NEOCON'S AND THE ZIONIST REGIME HAVE SURELY BEEN CAUGHT OUT ABOUT THEIR GLOBAL LIES...LISTEN CLOSELY TO NEIL'S STATEMENT TO THE STUDENT''S..HE IS INDIRECTLY TELLING THEM TO SEEK THE REAL TRUTH AND TO EXPOSE THE LIE AND DECEPTIONS BY THEIR GOVERNMENT.

    WE SEE THEM KILL OVER 3000 PPL IN THE WORLD TRADE CENTER AND MANY MILLIONS MORE OVER THE WORLD..DNT TRUST THEM OR THE ZIONIST MEDIA.THEY ARE THEE ILLUMINATI HELL BENT ON THE NWO.KILL'EM

  • who were mysteriously killed in countless acts of murder by the CIA AND FBI.

    DO YOU RESEARCH PEOPLE AND SEE HOW MANY INTERNAL NASA PEOPLE WORKING AT THE TIME OF THE APPOLLO PROJECT WERE SYSTEMATICALLY KILLED...STRANGE IS IT NOT THAT WE NEVER HERE ABOUT THEM AND THESE ISSUE'S ARE NEVER RAISED IN THE MEDIA..

    LOOK AT THE 911 ATTACKS..SEE HOW MANY EYE WITNESSES HAVE BEEN MURDERED AND KILLED BY THE CIA ETC.

    DONT TRUST THE GOVERNMENTS THEY ARE ALL CORRUPT BY THE CORE AND WANT TO CONTROL OUR WELL BIENG

  • @MrChiptatum

    Jebus.

    No NASA "research people" were systematically killed.

    You conspiracy turds will make up any kind of shit. You are shameless liars.

    Or retarded.

  • @Blahblobify agreed

    

  • @Blahblobify I WOULD SUGGEST YOU SHOULD GO READ SOME SERIOUS BOOKS LIKE TOM WOLFE. NOVEL'S..THE RIGHT STUFF....READ UP ON THE VAN ALLEN BELTS.DO YOUR RESEARCH ON BUZZ ALDRIN AND HIS PROBLEMS OVER THE YEARS...WHY HAVE THESE ASTRONAUTS NOT BEEN GIVEN MUCH IN PUBLICITY OVER THE MANY DECADES SINCE?

    YOU'LL FIND OUT REVEALING PROOF AND EVIDENCE THAT IT WAS CLEAR A HOAX LANDING AND A GREAT DECEPTION AND FABRICATION TO THE WORLD.

    READ UP ON THE AMOUNT EYE WITNESSES BEEN KILLED SINCE THE 911 ATTACKS

  • Comment removed

  • @Blahblobify FUCKING NAVIGATOR AND FUCKING AIR FORCE OFFICERS MORE LIKE YOU IGNORANT UNEDUCATED FOOL....YOU WERE INVOLVED IN THE MILITARY AVIATION SWEAR BOX COMPETITION MORE LIKE...

    YOU WRITE LIKE A IMBECILE AND A VERY DELUDED INDIVIDUAL...

    YOU MUST HAVE DEFINITELY BEEN A COOK IN THE MILITARY AND PASSED YOURSELF AS AN OFFICER.

    I KNOW YOUR KIND OF INDIVIDUALS..REMEMBER I WATCHING YOU CLOSELY.

    NOW GO SUCK ON YOUR MUM'S LEFT TIT.

  • Comment removed

  • @Blahblobify YOUR 60YRS OLD AND YOU TALK LIKE A SOMEBODY WHO DIDN'T EVEN PASS HIS HIGH SCHOOL...NOT STOP DELUDING YOURSELF AND LET THE NURSE IN YOUR NURSING HOME GIVE YOU SOME MORE MEDICATION FOR YOUR DEMENTIA AND ALZHEIMERS SYNDROME...OR ALTERNATIVELY I CAN SEND A SHRINK TO YOU AND TRY AND DIAGNOSE YOUR REAL ADVERSE AND ACUTE CONDITION OF GRANDEUR...NOW PLEASE TAKE YOUR MEDICATION B4 YOU SLIP INTO A COMA.

  • @Blahblobify im a conspiracy theorist my self. would you like to know what i think? it has njothing to do with this particular video btw

  • @DrIScream

    Sure as long as it makes sense and isn't retarded

  • @Blahblobify hm youll have to figure that out. made sense to me

  • @Blahblobify

    Whatsamatter? If we really went to the moon you wouldn't need to get so upset and emotional.

    Feeling the need to defend something you believe really happened is rather pathetic.

    For instance, I don't "believe" in WW2. I just take it as a fact and study it. If someone told me WW2 never happened I'd just shrug.

  • @AudieHolland you're a fine example of a conspiracy theorist going nuts

  • @cmekill64 Anything that fox news doesn't report is a conspiracy theory to you retards.

  • @DTX85 you think i watch Fox news like you dumb ass, don't you know everything FOX NEWS REPORTS IS BULL SHIT.

  • @Blahblobify there are uncounted Nasa research who disappeared permanently,replace by clones..evrybody working there knows it simply because they smell different from the orignal guys they replace..One quick trip to the rest room w/ any of them you'll readily disovered the truth, they do not urinate, never wil..THEY DO NOT HVE SEXUAL ORGAN THATS' WHY...@mrchiptatum, i think it's time for you to do real research time >One can only hope you still got chance though so slim the way you talk here

  • @baredwin

    LOL

  • @Blahblobify hey not everything is a lie though

  • @DrIScream

    If it supports a claim of the Apollo missions being faked is is ALWAYS a lie or a gross misrepresentation.

    Always.

  • @Blahblobify ya buncha fuckin liars

  • @Blahblobify ...Why does the search for the truth by others offend you so much? The only facts of this world are that people have feelings and that we need each other to reduce suffering. "Minds are like parachutes. They only function when they are open."

    - James Dewar

  • @fourb24 I would say he's just severely irritated by the lies and bullshit conspiracy theorists come up with. they might tell children there's no such thing as a stupid question but in reality there are plenty of stupid questions and claims people can make

  • @Blahblobify a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to break the law at some time in the future. Misinformation and/or evidence secrecy of what is bound to be public is a conspiracy. And YOU sir are a fucking Hill Billy who cannot have an opinion of his own. Good day to you...my fellow american XD

  • @MrChiptatum sources please

  • @MrChiptatum really?? you got nine lives like a cat..you're still breathing..the way your mouth froths even a hired 14 year old mexican girl killer from drug cartel wont miss you..you forgot to mentioned these mexican drug cartels are best friends of them you're referring to in your messge right male nagger?

  • yes Foxx

    why have these men been subjected to drink and been in hiding for decades...bcos they have been forced by the neocon's and the zionist regime to tell us lies and fabricate the lunar landing...

    NEIL is cleary distressed and gives hints to the students to find and do their own research and find the loopholes and the real truth.

    I don't fell sorry for NEIL AND THE astronauts..but its clear that him and his family would have been murdered along with many countless others who were myserious

  • This man is eaten up with guilt.

    I heard that some days he can hardly walk because his nerves.

    He never went to the Moon.

  • thanks for posting this valuable testimony of Armstrongs guilt - bless him - poor guy - what a burden to have to bear all his life!

  • If I had landed on the moon I would be constantly celebrating that fact and my position as the first man on the moon...but as you can clearly see they look dejected and all three of them look somewhat sterile and animated..this clearly indicates that the deception and fabrication of the moon landing is absolutely and categorically correct...in stating to this day nobody landed on the MOON.

    THE VAN ALLEN BELTS ARE SO SEVERE THAT NO MAN CAN VENTURE OUTSIDE THIS PROTECTIVE BARRIER..

  • @MrChiptatum interesting concept. is the radiation from the belts the same strength for their entire length?

  • @uknowispeaksense READ TOM WOLFE BOOK THE RIGHT STUFF...INTERESTING READ AND CONCEPT OF THE SEVERAL ASTRONAUTS...SHEPeRD GRISSOM,COPPER,Glenn, Carpenter.Schirra, Slayton,these several brave men gave accounts of interesting points...etc

    Also your ? you asked me does the severe radiation increase as you travel further towards the edge of the blue protective barrier we call the Van ALLEN BELTS...yes and the astronauts experienced severe blindness and intense feeling of radiation sickness..fact.

  • @MrChiptatum and dothe belts circle the globe like completely surround it or do they radiate out from the poles? I seem to remember reading somewhere that they come out of the globe between latitudes 20-35 degrees N and S. Does that sound right?

  • @uknowispeaksense one thing to remember if you are of lighter skin you must protect your precious skin by applying any type of sun screen from UV LIGHT and if your of a dark skin color your skin is more resilient from the UV Light correct?

    Now ,in many respects your right the magnetic axis points at each end of our globe do not have much in proton flux...so yes your partially right in saying so.

    But this certainly does not make much of a difference to what the astronauts experienced.

  • @MrChiptatum why are youtalking about UV? I don't understand your answer. Are the belts radiating out between20-35 degrees latitude and are they the same strength for their entire length?

  • @uknowispeaksense you've mis-interpreted my reply...example to you...why when we go out in the sun we have to apply uv sensitive lotions to our skin...

    my point is we have to protect the human skin from severe UV LIGHT...

    Now consider the issue of travelling outside the protective VAN ALLEN BELTS.,where the UV sun is even more intense...that was my point....that the dynamics of these protective layers which surround our planet is ultimately mankind's savior.

    luk up the results of van allen belts

  • @MrChiptatum I see.Well its a good thing they had space suits on then.

  • This video is great. He is quite clearly referring to science's constant strides forward and how the next generation need to continue the advancement of knowledge, like he did in the moon landing (which, by the way, did happen).

    It's almost as if some of you WANT there to be a global conspiracy, just so you'd look right. There is nothing in this video that worries me or any other person of good mental health.

  • 0funny how the truth wills out, those privilaged few that did go to the moon made the wrong descision in spite of nsa not to fully disclose the fact that when they landed they were completely surrounded by greys and the crafts, theese so called astronauts had a duty to tell the world and failed , too late now hope they realise theyv'e failed a huge test in life towards humanity, the result.. NWO and nsa have years of knowledge of ET's their craft and how they fly, guess most of us know now.

  • you don't see Neil Armstrong talking to anybody

  • Scarred for life #FAIL

  • Oh God, more of Bart Sibrel's nonsense.You know, these guys were test pilots, not game show hosts. Armstrong in particular was a shy guy. He could handle just about any aircraft ever built during that era, but just wasn't all that comfortable in front of cameras-and somehow that proves some kind of conspiracy. Please.

    Try logging off the web and reading some real book on the subject, not just NASA stuff, since you don't believe them anyway. Check reports from Brits & Soviets who monitored Apollo

  • Armstrong is torn up over having the world think he was this great historical figure

    supposedly the first man to walk on the moon, while at the same time knowing he didn't do any such thing. He didn't like the feeling of having people faun all over him,

    and tell him how great he was, while he felt like a phony shill liar having to spend the rest of his life lying about this crime and hoax. His cryptic speech here is saying that maybe in the future, people will learn that it was all TV fakery.

  • "Breakthroughs available" , he said ; to those who can "remove "one" of truths protective "layers". Truth: Def.- the true or actual state of a matter. His whole life is about the moon and knowledge concerning it and space. In my opinion his emotional address is referring to this. This civilizations history will wash away just like the ones before, and like wise and plans to come. My stand is that in time Truth will reveal it's self.

  • OK.... we didn't land on the moon ! SO ?

    And I know it's true cuz Kurt Cobain that's been sleeping on my couch since 1994 said so. But he ain't lookin' too good.

  • @TacomaPaul Howard Hughes flew down from Niberu aboard the Starship Enterprise and told me the same thing, so I know you are telling the truth.

  • Could someone write down what he says? i don't get it.

  • do you know why there sad and depressed? When the Astronauts went to the Moon, there is overwhelming evidence that they discovered Aliens observing them on the lunar surface.

  • well, they faked it, and thats it. man cannot survive outside th e magneto sphere anyway so i dunno why any1 even bothers beleiving in the whole apollo fairytale, and now neils crying, telling us to remove "one of truths protective layers". dont worry america, maybe THIS is the fake video and its not really neil... hahahaha!!

  • @MrToiletface If the moon landing was all fake how did they bring back samples of the moon?

  • @Stilllil They had unmanned craft that had been gathering rocks as did the soviets.

  • @MrToiletface I am afraid my friend that the video most probably is not fake....

  • Armstrong was depressed in the original press conference as well.

    This guy is coerced into lying and he's ashamed for it.

    clear as can be.

    I am sorry for him.

  • @TheHorsenation

    Wrong.

  • @TheHorsenation It is so hard to watch that great man struggling of knowing how unfair and cruel politics could be:(((((((((((((((

  • awaahhh poor man the "LIE" is get thing Heavyer,he should be happpy to be the first man to walk then moon but how can you be happy for something you haven't done.

  • to you we say: we`ve only completed the beginning we leave yo much that is undone, there are great ideas undiscovered ,

    breakthroughs available,

    FOR THOSE WHO CAN REMOVE ONE O OF "TRUTHS PROTECTIVE LAYERS"

    in other words, he knows much more than we know but he has been silences and he knows it, thats why the tears.

  • @Estebanfuturo

    I agree. It struck me too - the tears. The opening shot speaks volumes. What is concerning is who is stopping them telling the truth and why. Above all, what is the truth?

    'Three things are long not hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth'. - Confucius

  • It's not cryptic, he is just talking about new exploration, it's easy to jump to the conclusion that "removing one of truth's protective layers" refers to some cover-up. Maybe it's just referring to the vast amount we have yet to learn about the Cosmos. He is a scientist after-all. Also, without the "mood music" it's not so mysterious. :-)

  • @matbatimus or mayb he talkn about the van allen belts

  • @matbatimus to learn and discover new things, only requires to learn it, or discover it, however u want to put it. But here he is saying, not only are there things to discover but there are things in the way from us discovering them. There are forces making sure essential truths are kept away from our knowledge. From humanity's knowledge.

  • @Shonaripa I guess that's a fair point. I do feel it's easy for something said in a matter of fact way to be sensationalised though. Occam's Razor springs to mind. :-)

  • @matbatimus reason these conclusion are made dont come from this tiny piece of video alone.

    There is a whole context to it, regarding history of the moon, what it really is, the nature of reality, the nature of those who operate in the shadows. You might wanna check that out.

  • there is a layer (FAKED FOOTAGE AND FAKED NEWS REPORTING ) that "protects" the truth (WE NEVER LANDED ON THE MOON / TV FAKERY)

    That LAYER OF BS, protects the perps (NASA) that INTEND TO HIDE THIS TERRIBLE TRUTH FOREVER.

    The protective layer (the bullshit TV Fakery, THE LYING SHILL SCIENTISTS AND THE LYING SHILL ASTRONAUTS, ) was put in place (broadcast to the world and given as the official story by NASA and government, as reality, and the subsequent cover up

  • @iconoclast911 firt mythbuster prove dat the landing on the moon was real .2 china going on thew moon soon if a nother country going to the moon do you think it hard to hide something like this !? the flag the boggey ect ect and dere are suppose to go see the site on the U.S landing so i really dont think it a hoax

    p.s sorry for my english

  • @soldatqc Well.. it is 

  • @soldatqc Your English is just fine, and you are right. It is NOT a hoax. The problem with conspiracy believers, however, is they are always just going to broaden their idea of who all is in on the conspiracy in order to protect the way they think. They will do everything to protect their point of view because they cannot handle it being proven false.

    Conspiracy believers will just claim China is in on it as well. And everyone else who goes to the moon in the future.

  • @iconoclast911 And also I guess the lying Soviet Union, the lying People's Republic of China, the lying EU, the lying countless numbers of amateur radio operators, the lying countless numbers of amateur astronomers...

    In order for a conspiracy to be this large and this well protected millions of people, particularly those who have everything to gain and nothing to lose if they came forward, would have to have kept up the lie for almost a century.

    No.

  • @EmperorofCartoons

    Disinformation agent lol.

    The suppression campaign is not just an intelligence operation it is also a psychological one; including dicks like this guy who may or may not be aware of the shit he is chatting.

    Anyone who is aware of the following terms: Disinformation, misinformation, COINTELPRO and psychological operation can find out the truth about "U.F.Os" "Aliens" and "The New World Order" through smart searching.

    I'm probably been monitored and I don't give a fuck

  • @lifestoshortforaname This guys account has been closed, funny eh?

  • PEEL BACK THE PROTECTIVE LAYERS OF TRUTH'?

    The truth does not produce protective layers for it self. The truth just is, and it is people who create smoke screens of deception, so that no one can simply look at the truth without obstruction, because the this truth, clearly seen, would cause terrible consequences for the one's who installed the opaque layer of BS designed to fool trick and scam the American people. Armstrong wants to spill the beans, but

    he is afraid for his life and his family

  • they seem sad, depressed , if i went to the moon i be HAPPY for LIFE

  • @PHILLYDEMOCRAT

    I think it was the shock of hearing that we (us humans) are nothing more than guinea pig lab experiments from MUCH more advanced beings is what freaked Neil out.

    NASA knows EXACTLY what the moon truly is, where us Homo Sapiens REALLY come from, and why they will never tell us (the general public) the TRUTH ever.

    NASA is a disinfo machine. We have already had manned missions to Mars and other planets but you wont hear about it on the news ever.

  • @PHILLYDEMOCRAT

    I totally agree. Something as small as a man should never have the privilege of seeing the entire world, the rock that all history has taken place on, before his eyes in person, but they have. I would be so happy to see such a sight.

  • @PHILLYDEMOCRAT yea i would to, but it seems like they saw or experienced something that was not to be publicized almost like he was choosing his words carefully........

  • @PHILLYDEMOCRAT Is it at all possible that once you've done something like go to the moon, the normal life seems mundane?

  • I'm not sure these men walked on the moon,NASA could have cover it up"

    Brian O'Leary NASA astronaut ,and scientific adviser of the Apollo program.

    watch?v=lOyYZIW0zvY

  • After watching Transformers 3, everybody is going to buy alien crap like hot dog n soda! and subsequently think... Aha, that's what he was talking about... WRONG!

    Truths protective layer: government lies, cover ups, MSM propaganda...

  • @esh1 Exactly

  • cryptic my ass.

  • @steeliedude your ass is not cryptic

  • Moon Rising ..... I video I recommend ppl watch. 

  • oh please....

  • He must have been drinking that day.

  • He was merely talking about truths being hidden. The eerie music in the background only puts the speech in a "Twilight Zone" context. Scientists still don't know how to conduct certain things which CAN be done. The "protective layers" are the complexities surrounding the truth. There is no conspiracy here.

  • Comment removed

  • I'm wondering now if not the landing was faked..but that he had seen or found out something that was unique to his experience either on the journey their or back or on his view of the terrain...

  • @realskpetic have a look at this. Wait until you get to a little after 3 minutes in this. The rest I will leave for you to research. Listen to the English transmission.

    watch?v=rmsVj_kjDcw

  • @realskpetic More than likely, as has been surmised by many learned folk, they found evidence of life that would entirely shift our paradigm and self centred predisposition that states we are IT in the universe as far as sentient life is concerned.

  • @ElegantPaws01 do u actually "HEAR" yourself. common Fukking sense say's we are not IT,in a infinite universe,but u think that's reason,behind the moon landing HOAX. if they did see "ET'S" azz up there,don't u think they would have used that,to scare the shit out of everybody???.

  • @myleftnutts Not quite sure what youa re saying re scaring everyone. Elucidate (explain more what your point is). Without question the universe is teaming with life. To believe otherwise is absolute idiocy. Only the untutored and wholly ignorant amongst us would ascribe to mankind being the pinnacle of existence.

  • is it real that he converted into islam? because he heard some strange sounds on the moon?

  • @CurlyTopsRicoa lol wut? why the hell would he convert to stupid islam cuz "he heard" sounds on the moon?

  • @CurlyTopsRicoa

    he never said that

  • @CurlyTopsRicoa LOL no

  • The Ruskies would have picked on this ( to be) hoax,, so..nope,, I don't buy your thoughts....

  • He's basically saying it's faked and covered-up, isn't he... Yup.

  • God speed,

  • Moon landing = fucking fake

  • @fuckmania07 Oh no, the missions were real. That is not what is fake. What is fake is the rationale for the missions. We went for a reason. The results have never actually been shared.

  • @fuckmania07 Absolutely faked. This has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Since I started applauding the fine efforts and conclusive evidence of the faked moon landings by Canadian and British scholars, I have had a NASA paid asshole following my ass around youtube, sending tons of scathing messages. The truth does hurt. And the proof of it is that NASA has sent a little pup to take on big dog Glinka. And he done got bit. 

  • @Glinkaism1 Are you saying that we haven't been to the moon? Or that the Apollo 11 landing was faked?

  • @Glinkaism1 What he is saying is that the astronauts were not alone on the moon.........with 2 disc shaped UFOs overlooking the landing site. This has been suppressed by NASA. Let us hope the truth eventually comes out.....

  • @FrenchExpat1 Yeah, could be. More likely he was referring the the cameramen, lighting technicians, gaffers, dialogue prompters, teleprompters, line producers on the set and directors on the set as they shot the landings in the abandoned-looking hangar in the desert outside of Houston. :) Bonne annee, mon amie!

  • @Glinkaism1 the not-landing-on-the-moon conspiracy theory,its roots have been planted by the nasa itself,prior to apollo 11, so that the people who are usually sceptic towards gouvernment stuff would ask the wrong questions on the right topic...for example...why use gold visors...it goes much deeper than you think....

  • @fuckmania07 Which moon landing are you referring to?