I absolutely love Gulda's style of playing piano. He not only commands the piano but also gives so much respect and consideration to the music and its composer.
a zene tovább-alkotás,az ,hogy mereven ragaszkodunk a partitúrához,nem járható,pont bizonyosfoku módosítás,a jövő,néha jobb az interpretátor,mint a szerző...nem lesz mindig ilyen merev a világ,persze az kérdés,hol a határ,gulda pont a legjobb,nagyszerű érzéke van mozarthoz,mintha egypetéjú ikrek lennének
Martha Argerich says on many interwiews that Gulda is her favorite pianist of all time. She considers him a pure genius as a pianist and as a musician.
The idiom: "playing music" is - maybe - mostly true by Mozart. Gulda "plays" but not acts that he is playing! He is a true person. I suppose that Mozart would be happy if he would see that his music is still so popular and so vividly played after some 200 years his death.
Gulda was a fabulous music talent. He just had the technichal skill, the interperative ability and The touch. But the guy never practiced, and when he screwed up he'd just laughed it off as though it didn't matter. It was as though he had no respect either for the composer or for the pianist's craft. He just liked music.
how does one interpret mozart? judging from the more recent comments here this must be the way NOT to play mozart...however, how come every time i listen to this vid my heart jumps a beat and i have a huge smile on my face?...personal taste/disposition? - maybe. A seasoned and internationally acclaimed pianist doing a good job at playing the music of the composer he most loved? - not unlikely...
Gulda is not my favorite pianist but I would never say that this is the way NOT to play Mozart,that is an exaggeration at least..
He is fine ,he can be interesting but he also bothers me from time to time,like his playing is somehow not sensitive on some passages
I do not want to sweat here trying to explain exactly what I mean by that and there is no need as music and its performance are subjects to different taste
What bothers me are the superlatives people use here sometimes
well..when you put it that way it certainly neutralizes my wish to be sarcastic
I am not a big fan of Mr Gulda but that is not the reason
the reason is down there-why call someone who criticizes his performance "deaftone"?
Mr Gulda can be original ,attractive and unconventional but he can also be ..well I will not say it but let's just say there is a place for criticism,in my opinion
of course I do not have problem with people having different opinions but by your post to toflyf
@vkoracx Are your ears large like radar dishes.? why so sensitive to great music.If this 'bothers' you then why listen, or are you a masochist.?
"Like he is flat in spite of all his dynamics" what is that supposed to mean and yes you need to be a bloody good pianist to criticise this one. I assume you are not.
Yes he chose to build a music career.....what do you do apart from criticise people you cannot match.
@vkoracx This is 20th century not 18th, and it's a grand piano not a hammerklavier, as well as the orchestra instruments are modern instruments. So it is a modern sound, and Gulda is performing a modern interpretation. One can criticize his rough tone or some bebop articulation at some spots, but the structural idea is completely clear in every note Gulda plays. This points out his mastership.
yes I am aware of the fact it is 20th century,thank you ,and there are many other modern pianists with modern interpretations (eg Pogorelic,or even Uchida for that matter) that I like
to think that I am conservative and that modern interpretations of composers bother me is a mistake,of course that the interpreter of 20th century will put an emphasis on different elements of music that is ,in fact ,eternal and detached from the specific time it was written in in many ways
@vkoracx I was quite pilloried for having said much the same thing. Gulda was a fascinating mn, extremely talented, brilliant even. But his (very dated) "rejection" of standard forms for classical music, as his complete refusal to wear concert dress, I always felt (notice: stated as OPINION,) spills over into his execution of the music. His Attitude comes through; it's just not "worth it" to put effort into clothes for example. Sometimes his PLAYING sounds like he's making "no effort" on it too.
The 10th anniversary of the death of Friedrich Gulda.
It is go found its favourite composers deceased,who died much too early,I think he still had plenty of surprise musical to amaze us.It allowed has the new generation of musicians approach casual.With Mozart was only to have find the intimate key composer,eternal misunderstood of critics who na stayed desired pas confined to mold a great interpreter of piano.
It would be respectful to Gulda if the owner of this clip, removed the comments by goodguysdoll , as they are totally un-necessary and very disrespectful. The quality of this music deserves only respect.
@vkoracx what degree of refinement does mozart deserve then? i think gulda does a brilliant job exactly by not being too 'refined' (although his technique is flawless). he plays mozart at his heart's content and thus conveys an exuberance and playfulness that more 'academic' and nit-picking interpreters fail to deliver. i think mozart's music does invite a high degree of spontaneity and ad-hoc musicianship, which would be in line with 18th century performance practice. that's what gulda does...
@dernettep by "refined" I didn't mean-not spontaneous ,rigid and "academic" as you say
his performance is not subtle enough and his progressions sound clumsy to me which is definitely not in line with the expectations from 18 century music-and especially Mozarts music
read Mozart letters-I am pretty sure he would have disliked Gouldas performance of his own music too:)
@vkoracx Dude... seriously... I have to laugh at this comment that you made about Mozart disliking Gulda. Gulda is an amazing interpreter of Mozart. You really do mean "rigid and academic" and you just don't realize it at the present time. Gulda is very good at Mozart.
@dernettep Touche for pointing out that Mozart doesn't require the sort of refinement that others are on about. We're talking about Mozart -a guy who penned a concerto and then performed it before the ink on the page was dry. There's proof in a letter from L. Mozart, who wrote to Nannerel (I believe), stating that Mozart performed his 20th piano concerto after having barely finished writing it. I believe it also mentions that there wasn't even a rehearsal. Refinement??
refined-it is Mozarts character,an integral part of his music-his musical thoughts are refined,he never lets the emotion "spill out" but puts it under control.shows us something beautiful for a glimpse ,then moves it away from us.that gives it a great value
do you understand Mozarts music?
would you like to play it as Beethoven? or what
Mozart was perfectly capable of writing a concerto "from his head" and then playing it flawlessly
@vkoracx You should get out of your ivory tower and stop pretending like you're the only person who understands Mozart. Everyone can see that you're an idealist, and not living in the real world. Don't ask me if I understand Mozart's music. It's insulting, and makes you look like a child.
If re-incarnation is a reality, then Mozart came back as Gulda to play his compositions as they are meant to be played......I hope he returns again in a similar form for future generations. RIP Gulda
Truly demented. WHAT ARE THOSE SICK MOVEMENTS "CONDUCTING?" i can't believe he stood up. The gestures while he plays are putrid. And he bangs like a pig. And that is an evil piano he plays on. He must have a financial agreement with Young Chang or Estonia pianos.
@goodguysdoll , Music can't be putrid, to be putrid is an adjective for something rotting. Check your English. You can have a Putrid colour, gestures can't be putrid.
post a video of yourself performing such a superb musical # and you'll give your perspective...no validity...because youtube jackasses don't play. they watch.
this is the best interperation EVER!! i like how he tweeks the boundaries ie, before commencing the cadenza, just like it was done over 200 years ago. Mozart could have done whatever he wanted, after all, all we have is structure written,,the rest is upto the artist in the mind of the piece and mozart....seriously, mozart being in his 30s and having the power of that piano, he would have played it like that!!
Peccato per i movimenti un po'sgarbati.Pero' al piano è impareggiabile.D'altronde per suonare bene con un orchestra alle spalle bisogna avere una visione d'insieme che solo i direttori d'orchestra hanno
l'evidenza con cui si capisce che non capisci un cazzo di musica è il semplice utlizzo dell' espressione ' movimenti sgarbati' che significano il nulla assoluto in questo ambito -
What was everybody listening to? I found this performance boorish at times, scales were poor, especially in the first movt,, rhythm was 'thumpy; throughout, cadenzas were at times intrusive. There were some very fine moments, no doubt, but let us reserve the superlatives. Gulda was magnificent in his early career, but to me, he has lost much of his sense of idiom. To my mind there are a dozen better performances out there. It all comes down to one's sense of idiom, I suspect.
do not speak. gulda was/is/will always be one of the greatest pianists the world has ever seen. he is used to playing beethoven where playing thumpy and rough is the name of the game.
@toflyf my dear boy, I pity you so much, You are obviously deaftone. But it is a problem which can be easily solved with the help of a small electronic device. Listen and learn, my dear, listen and learn. You have so much to apprehend...
@zerbespasek Obviously you must have some personal resentment to Him. I am sorry if my taste in judging Mr.Gulda's interpretation of Mozart is bothering you so much. It was not my intention to touch personally, it is just a mere difference in judgement. And I go on keeping mine happily.
Somedaythe blindness will come to an end and the so called "sophistocated intellectual"...world will understand that it's just the music wich touches us. No matter if we call it "jazz" or classical music". If Gulda played naked or not in black...Who cares? Beeing naked is a phenomea of our souls and Friedrich knows it. What a talent, what a musican, what a truly human beeing!
@mozzrt...probably you never did knock out the counter productive mind that it makes sense to make a difference between "classical touches" and "jazz". Did you know how Gulda did regard music? Did you know that all the baroque music was the floor of how jazz works in its material? I guess not. Am I right?
Someone that is so good on Jazz and Classical music (and it is VERY DIFFICULT to find such a pianist) can interpret any song in an orthodox or non-orthodox way and the result will be always very good.
Gulda was such a pianist.
A really EXCEPTIONAL musician with superior musical taste.
PS: People that criticize his "a bit heterodox" Bach Well Tempered Clavier rendition probably do not know that Bach himself did not marked speed or dynamics on the original manuscripts.
Do not be so fanatic. He was great, and one of best Mozarts interpreters, but "The best" never exists. Did you listen Pollini? Michelangelli? Yablonskaya? etc.
good interpretation but at last only interpretation.. mozart has improvised his music - classical interpretation is absolutely overestimated. a point : "Do not follow the old masters´steps, but seek what they were seeking... " Basho (1644-1694) : japanese haiku - master :-) ! ..you wonna see/hear something realy innovative - how to improvise classical music ?! look for video : "bach sarabande jazz guitar" or visite renatorozic dot com ..you ll be nicely surprised .. :-)
I absolutely love Gulda's style of playing piano. He not only commands the piano but also gives so much respect and consideration to the music and its composer.
EliasCalabretta1 1 hour ago
the eddie van halen of piano strikes again!
Achbiter 1 month ago
WOW, Perfect <3
ValerieGreenDay 2 months ago
Wenn jemand anders fühlt als Brendel, muss er anders spielen. Warum nicht auch mal "harsh"
MK40213 2 months ago
Danke, habe Link gesetzt
MrConvivator 2 months ago
straordinario !
beethoven1357 3 months ago
a zene tovább-alkotás,az ,hogy mereven ragaszkodunk a partitúrához,nem járható,pont bizonyosfoku módosítás,a jövő,néha jobb az interpretátor,mint a szerző...nem lesz mindig ilyen merev a világ,persze az kérdés,hol a határ,gulda pont a legjobb,nagyszerű érzéke van mozarthoz,mintha egypetéjú ikrek lennének
lesliefoy49 4 months ago
dear gulda! be the earth light upon YOU!,you were the best....
lesliefoy49 4 months ago
Wow!
EVELINEK 5 months ago
Martha Argerich says on many interwiews that Gulda is her favorite pianist of all time. She considers him a pure genius as a pianist and as a musician.
unaseradiprimavera 5 months ago
@unaseradiprimavera
we all know that great talent doesn't always come with good taste
vkoracx 5 months ago
The idiom: "playing music" is - maybe - mostly true by Mozart. Gulda "plays" but not acts that he is playing! He is a true person. I suppose that Mozart would be happy if he would see that his music is still so popular and so vividly played after some 200 years his death.
benkejozsi 5 months ago
it isn't that he's flat. he's just not sentimental... he is fearless
diegorosd 6 months ago
Bello
gabypal87 8 months ago
Gulda was a fabulous music talent. He just had the technichal skill, the interperative ability and The touch. But the guy never practiced, and when he screwed up he'd just laughed it off as though it didn't matter. It was as though he had no respect either for the composer or for the pianist's craft. He just liked music.
mc0558 9 months ago
how does one interpret mozart? judging from the more recent comments here this must be the way NOT to play mozart...however, how come every time i listen to this vid my heart jumps a beat and i have a huge smile on my face?...personal taste/disposition? - maybe. A seasoned and internationally acclaimed pianist doing a good job at playing the music of the composer he most loved? - not unlikely...
dernettep 11 months ago
@dernettep
Gulda is not my favorite pianist but I would never say that this is the way NOT to play Mozart,that is an exaggeration at least..
He is fine ,he can be interesting but he also bothers me from time to time,like his playing is somehow not sensitive on some passages
I do not want to sweat here trying to explain exactly what I mean by that and there is no need as music and its performance are subjects to different taste
What bothers me are the superlatives people use here sometimes
vkoracx 11 months ago
listen to this:
Maria Yudina plays Mozart Concerto No. 23 in A Major (1/3)
and see what the great interpretation of Mozart is
gurthgirth 11 months ago
well..when you put it that way it certainly neutralizes my wish to be sarcastic
I am not a big fan of Mr Gulda but that is not the reason
the reason is down there-why call someone who criticizes his performance "deaftone"?
Mr Gulda can be original ,attractive and unconventional but he can also be ..well I will not say it but let's just say there is a place for criticism,in my opinion
of course I do not have problem with people having different opinions but by your post to toflyf
zerbespasek 11 months ago
something bothers me with this guys performance
there are nice moments but there are also some that are harsh for ears (at least mine)
like he is flat in spite all of his dynamics
you do not have to be a professional pianist to be able to criticize someones playing the argument "go and play it better if you can" is so old
it was his choice to build a musical career and we,the audience ,are more than entitled to approach his performances critically
vkoracx 11 months ago 22
@vkoracx Are your ears large like radar dishes.? why so sensitive to great music.If this 'bothers' you then why listen, or are you a masochist.?
"Like he is flat in spite of all his dynamics" what is that supposed to mean and yes you need to be a bloody good pianist to criticise this one. I assume you are not.
Yes he chose to build a music career.....what do you do apart from criticise people you cannot match.
ThePainter62 9 months ago
@ThePainter62
like I said-you actually do not have to be a bloody good pianist to criticize somebody else
that is his profession-not mine and i have every right to criticize him if I want
vkoracx 9 months ago
@vkoracx This is 20th century not 18th, and it's a grand piano not a hammerklavier, as well as the orchestra instruments are modern instruments. So it is a modern sound, and Gulda is performing a modern interpretation. One can criticize his rough tone or some bebop articulation at some spots, but the structural idea is completely clear in every note Gulda plays. This points out his mastership.
der011n 7 months ago 2
@der011n
yes I am aware of the fact it is 20th century,thank you ,and there are many other modern pianists with modern interpretations (eg Pogorelic,or even Uchida for that matter) that I like
to think that I am conservative and that modern interpretations of composers bother me is a mistake,of course that the interpreter of 20th century will put an emphasis on different elements of music that is ,in fact ,eternal and detached from the specific time it was written in in many ways
vkoracx 7 months ago
@vkoracx I was quite pilloried for having said much the same thing. Gulda was a fascinating mn, extremely talented, brilliant even. But his (very dated) "rejection" of standard forms for classical music, as his complete refusal to wear concert dress, I always felt (notice: stated as OPINION,) spills over into his execution of the music. His Attitude comes through; it's just not "worth it" to put effort into clothes for example. Sometimes his PLAYING sounds like he's making "no effort" on it too.
UlfenDaddy 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@toflyf
You may be exaggerating a bit but,overall you might be right
something bothers me with this guys performance
there are nice moments but there are also some that are harsh for ears (at least mine)
like he is flat in spite all of his dynamics
vkoracx 11 months ago 25
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
it is like the enemies of Mozart sent Gulda to disrespect him by this awful playing
techboydada2 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
Comment removed
Sviolinist 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
27 january 2011
The 10th anniversary of the death of Friedrich Gulda.
It is go found its favourite composers deceased,who died much too early,I think he still had plenty of surprise musical to amaze us.It allowed has the new generation of musicians approach casual.With Mozart was only to have find the intimate key composer,eternal misunderstood of critics who na stayed desired pas confined to mold a great interpreter of piano.
Thank you M. F. GULDA
FRESKOL 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Such great, great Mozart. Gulda was the greatest.
Sviolinist 1 year ago
@Sviolinist
oh my gosh what a stupid comment
techboydada2 11 months ago
wonderful!
chicagoman58 1 year ago
It would be respectful to Gulda if the owner of this clip, removed the comments by goodguysdoll , as they are totally un-necessary and very disrespectful. The quality of this music deserves only respect.
ThePainter62 1 year ago
@ThePainter62
actually,it doesn't If you had a really good ear you would hear that his playing is not that sensible and refined as Mozart deserves...
He is ok but not more than that
vkoracx 1 year ago
@vkoracx what degree of refinement does mozart deserve then? i think gulda does a brilliant job exactly by not being too 'refined' (although his technique is flawless). he plays mozart at his heart's content and thus conveys an exuberance and playfulness that more 'academic' and nit-picking interpreters fail to deliver. i think mozart's music does invite a high degree of spontaneity and ad-hoc musicianship, which would be in line with 18th century performance practice. that's what gulda does...
dernettep 1 year ago
@dernettep by "refined" I didn't mean-not spontaneous ,rigid and "academic" as you say
his performance is not subtle enough and his progressions sound clumsy to me which is definitely not in line with the expectations from 18 century music-and especially Mozarts music
read Mozart letters-I am pretty sure he would have disliked Gouldas performance of his own music too:)
vkoracx 1 year ago 16
This has been flagged as spam show
@vkoracx Dude... seriously... I have to laugh at this comment that you made about Mozart disliking Gulda. Gulda is an amazing interpreter of Mozart. You really do mean "rigid and academic" and you just don't realize it at the present time. Gulda is very good at Mozart.
Sviolinist 11 months ago
@Sviolinist
you can laugh as much as you want
that is my opinion and it is as relevant and valid as yours
let me ask you something else-do you like Michuko Uchida?
vkoracx 11 months ago
Comment removed
Sviolinist 11 months ago
Comment removed
Sviolinist 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dernettep Touche for pointing out that Mozart doesn't require the sort of refinement that others are on about. We're talking about Mozart -a guy who penned a concerto and then performed it before the ink on the page was dry. There's proof in a letter from L. Mozart, who wrote to Nannerel (I believe), stating that Mozart performed his 20th piano concerto after having barely finished writing it. I believe it also mentions that there wasn't even a rehearsal. Refinement??
Sviolinist 11 months ago
@Sviolinist
refined-it is Mozarts character,an integral part of his music-his musical thoughts are refined,he never lets the emotion "spill out" but puts it under control.shows us something beautiful for a glimpse ,then moves it away from us.that gives it a great value
do you understand Mozarts music?
would you like to play it as Beethoven? or what
Mozart was perfectly capable of writing a concerto "from his head" and then playing it flawlessly
vkoracx 11 months ago 23
This has been flagged as spam show
@vkoracx You should get out of your ivory tower and stop pretending like you're the only person who understands Mozart. Everyone can see that you're an idealist, and not living in the real world. Don't ask me if I understand Mozart's music. It's insulting, and makes you look like a child.
Sviolinist 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sviolinist never said that I am the only one who understands Mozart but I do understand him better than you do ,according to these comments lol
If you do not want insults then stop making them yourself ,defining me in stupid ways
The thoughts/things you write here go well together with your musical perception
Now...listen...I already know it for a fact :)
vkoracx 11 months ago 19
Comment removed
vkoracx 1 year ago
If re-incarnation is a reality, then Mozart came back as Gulda to play his compositions as they are meant to be played......I hope he returns again in a similar form for future generations. RIP Gulda
ThePainter62 1 year ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 1 year ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 1 year ago
@ThePainter62
that is one of the most stupid sentences I have seen this year...You are a winner so far
vkoracx 1 year ago
Truly demented. WHAT ARE THOSE SICK MOVEMENTS "CONDUCTING?" i can't believe he stood up. The gestures while he plays are putrid. And he bangs like a pig. And that is an evil piano he plays on. He must have a financial agreement with Young Chang or Estonia pianos.
goodguysdoll 1 year ago
@goodguysdoll , Music can't be putrid, to be putrid is an adjective for something rotting. Check your English. You can have a Putrid colour, gestures can't be putrid.
POOKEY84 1 year ago
Comment removed
ThePainter62 1 year ago
Comment removed
ThePainter62 1 year ago
@goodguysdoll
post a video of yourself performing such a superb musical # and you'll give your perspective...no validity...because youtube jackasses don't play. they watch.
Tra1n3rfromH3ll 1 year ago
@Tra1n3rfromH3ll
Gulda is a fake
kifladan 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tra1n3rfromH3ll
you do not have to be a professional pianist to be able to criticize someones playing
the argument "go and play it better if you can" is soo old
it was his choice to build a musical career and we,the audience ,are more than entitled to approach his performances critically
vkoracx 11 months ago 21
@goodguysdoll
btw, keep up the good trolling : )
Tra1n3rfromH3ll 1 year ago
@goodguysdoll
actually,by know he is a skeleton,not putrid
And you are one sick motherfcuker
vkoracx 1 year ago
@goodguysdoll
you are right
and he is evil too
makes poor Mozart roll in his grave
techboydada2 11 months ago
Wahnsinnig gut!!!
bekiof 1 year ago
gulda vs von
Who is better ¿?¿?
lasreliquias 1 year ago
this is the best interperation EVER!! i like how he tweeks the boundaries ie, before commencing the cadenza, just like it was done over 200 years ago. Mozart could have done whatever he wanted, after all, all we have is structure written,,the rest is upto the artist in the mind of the piece and mozart....seriously, mozart being in his 30s and having the power of that piano, he would have played it like that!!
aforeman737 1 year ago
He was indeed epic, but so was Horowitz, but then again they were all great, everyone in their own way. But in any case Gulda rules! :D
nakaza3421 1 year ago
Maestoso
Jedideuolf 1 year ago
10 years with no Mr.Gulda U.U R.I.P.
CHAKALITOxDDx 2 years ago
Peccato per i movimenti un po'sgarbati.Pero' al piano è impareggiabile.D'altronde per suonare bene con un orchestra alle spalle bisogna avere una visione d'insieme che solo i direttori d'orchestra hanno
jonlinnon 2 years ago
Comment removed
ALEXTAGLIAVIA 2 years ago
...vatti a fare una sacrosanta scopata!
ALEXTAGLIAVIA 2 years ago
Fammi un pom...ino finocchio
jonlinnon 2 years ago
l'evidenza con cui si capisce che non capisci un cazzo di musica è il semplice utlizzo dell' espressione ' movimenti sgarbati' che significano il nulla assoluto in questo ambito -
ALEXTAGLIAVIA 2 years ago
chiamali spezzati,spasmodici o come cazzo ti pare ma il fatto che sei un coglione resta sempre.
jonlinnon 2 years ago
der gulda ist der gott!
DiLassu 2 years ago
gulda sei grande per me non sei mai morto
magnelli1000 2 years ago
Perhaps, in the technical plan the given perfomance is not so perfect, but when it is a question of the genius all it is petty intrigues, I think.
AlexTrukhin 2 years ago
What was everybody listening to? I found this performance boorish at times, scales were poor, especially in the first movt,, rhythm was 'thumpy; throughout, cadenzas were at times intrusive. There were some very fine moments, no doubt, but let us reserve the superlatives. Gulda was magnificent in his early career, but to me, he has lost much of his sense of idiom. To my mind there are a dozen better performances out there. It all comes down to one's sense of idiom, I suspect.
toflyf 2 years ago
do not speak. gulda was/is/will always be one of the greatest pianists the world has ever seen. he is used to playing beethoven where playing thumpy and rough is the name of the game.
Mercer1012 2 years ago
No doubt statements like this are based on the high quality youtube video and high fidelity!
Giveme a break!
rogerrescu 2 years ago
@toflyf my dear boy, I pity you so much, You are obviously deaftone. But it is a problem which can be easily solved with the help of a small electronic device. Listen and learn, my dear, listen and learn. You have so much to apprehend...
PUCCINIMUSICK 11 months ago
Comment removed
zerbespasek 11 months ago
@PUCCINIMUSICK
so you like him that much..
perhaps you were blinded by his beauty
you should lick the sweat off his forehead while turning pages for him
zerbespasek 11 months ago
@zerbespasek Obviously you must have some personal resentment to Him. I am sorry if my taste in judging Mr.Gulda's interpretation of Mozart is bothering you so much. It was not my intention to touch personally, it is just a mere difference in judgement. And I go on keeping mine happily.
PUCCINIMUSICK 11 months ago
Comment removed
zerbespasek 11 months ago
Comment removed
zerbespasek 11 months ago
@zerbespasek
it seems that you do,at least sometimes :)
zerbespasek 11 months ago
Comment removed
vkoracx 11 months ago
simpatico e superbo.Grande!!!!
ariannaleardi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
is that the fucking pope?
yougotcrad1 2 years ago
ha ha
jamesrally 2 years ago
omg...i just realized that while i am familiar with Mozart's piano concertoes 20, 21, 24, 27...........i know ardly of any others, like this one.
freeqwerqwer 2 years ago
check out 15 i think whole thing sgr8
dorkup 2 years ago
God, I like everything he played.
einmarmor 2 years ago 4
he is a very amazing conductor and player. :)
greendaychick105 2 years ago
Simply superb. Technique, interpretation, spirit of Music. This IS Mozart!
PUCCINIMUSICK 2 years ago 3
One of the greatest pianist of music history! He looks very funny!
sgh31 2 years ago 3
great composition from Mozart, played by a great pianist and conductor, mmm....
MozartK365 2 years ago 4
I give this one trillion stars...I love Gulda!
catgumart 2 years ago 5
CLAUDIA ATCHAWONG
877hcz 2 years ago
Somedaythe blindness will come to an end and the so called "sophistocated intellectual"...world will understand that it's just the music wich touches us. No matter if we call it "jazz" or classical music". If Gulda played naked or not in black...Who cares? Beeing naked is a phenomea of our souls and Friedrich knows it. What a talent, what a musican, what a truly human beeing!
1hakon 2 years ago 2
jazz touches you - classical touches us 'S.I.'Also this concerto is among Mozarts least good, among with k451, k413 and k414.
mozzrt 2 years ago
@mozzrt...probably you never did knock out the counter productive mind that it makes sense to make a difference between "classical touches" and "jazz". Did you know how Gulda did regard music? Did you know that all the baroque music was the floor of how jazz works in its material? I guess not. Am I right?
1hakon 2 years ago
Who cares what he wearing...this is awesome!
violinmaker1964 2 years ago 3
Why is he wearing sunglasses?
Phi1618033 2 years ago
par souci d' harmonie de coloris avec sa coiffure?
costepi 2 years ago
Someone that is so good on Jazz and Classical music (and it is VERY DIFFICULT to find such a pianist) can interpret any song in an orthodox or non-orthodox way and the result will be always very good.
Gulda was such a pianist.
A really EXCEPTIONAL musician with superior musical taste.
PS: People that criticize his "a bit heterodox" Bach Well Tempered Clavier rendition probably do not know that Bach himself did not marked speed or dynamics on the original manuscripts.
ClassicalOJazz 2 years ago 5
Brisk tempo indeed. But because of Gulda's velvety touch and unforced sonority it just seems to take wing. Fly baby fly!
ipmoic 2 years ago
Magnifico!
estebanes16 3 years ago 2
Gulda es la Excelencia
obenwaldt 3 years ago 2
long live mozart,excellent piano concert,getting alone well with that particular own style of gulda
beethomozart 3 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
it looks so easy! all the notes sounds clearly, bravo!
Andres020202 3 years ago 13
Dirigieren und Klavierspielen sind zwei unterschiedliche Kompetenzen...
CWenning 3 years ago
perfect!!
perfect itself
ouka777 3 years ago 5
Fantástica interpretación ¡Bravo F. Gulda!
jbaravel 3 years ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
No doubt! Maestro Gulda was the best Mozart interpreter ever! Immortal!
alterjosef 4 years ago 16
Do not be so fanatic. He was great, and one of best Mozarts interpreters, but "The best" never exists. Did you listen Pollini? Michelangelli? Yablonskaya? etc.
ytpiano7
ytpiano7 4 years ago
yes i know very well pollini and also benedetti michelangeli, best is and rest gulda
alterjosef 4 years ago 5
C'est tout à fait époustouflant.
alrolova 3 years ago
i've got it now, if larry david and bill murray had a son it would be mr gulda, i love the relaxed setting in this recording
DiVeronica 4 years ago
to antoniomac5:
i see - kidds "read notes" and be called a genius..
do you know that beethoven hated this ?
doublearejazz 4 years ago
to antoniomac5 :
sorry, where s a problem ?
doublearejazz 4 years ago
wow it's great
vexillum1 4 years ago
they all ( bach, mozart, beethoven etc..)could improvise - and done it ! -they all teached improvisation and not interpretation ..its well-knowen !
interpretation is overestimated - its come with commercialization of classical music -
read "j.attali - l´economie politique de la musique"
doublearejazz 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
doublearejazz 4 years ago
I read that Beethoven was excellent at improvising on the piano.
cellestialX 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nicely surprised?
look for video : "The BEST enfant prodige of the world"... you'll be frighteningly surprised!
antoniomac5 4 years ago
The violinist sitting behind Gulda is acting like a jerk.
He's a little distracting.
cellestialX 4 years ago
The best remedy that I use to cheer up my day.
Thank you.
younggrandma 4 years ago 2
It makes me and my family feel happy, too. Ages
19,19, and 26. They feel lukewarm about most
classical music except happy Mozart music.
cellestialX 4 years ago
Beautiful. Thanks.
meandpepsi 4 years ago
I love this guy!!!
moderndesignworks 4 years ago 3
Oh God......
This is heaven. Youthfulness, joy, exuberance, humility.
Thank you, Mr. Gulda.
John Nauman
hotposer 4 years ago 5