Thank you for the lecture. definitely made things more clear to me. now let's see about tomorrow's test on Quine. Though if I may give a suggestion, stay with the analytic-synthetic distinction a little more, and a little less on detail on the various examples.
nice lecture, i think that what quine shows is only that most of the time we are being ambiguous, and not that there is no true diff between analytic and synthetic
This has been flagged as spam show
you can get her rockmycity.info
cliftonhauusd 8 months ago
Yes, non-locality follows from quantum mechanics if you interpret QM in a certain way. Look for Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.
bhigr 1 year ago
Thank you for the lecture. definitely made things more clear to me. now let's see about tomorrow's test on Quine. Though if I may give a suggestion, stay with the analytic-synthetic distinction a little more, and a little less on detail on the various examples.
FritsIV 1 year ago 2
nice lecture, i think that what quine shows is only that most of the time we are being ambiguous, and not that there is no true diff between analytic and synthetic
anyway, what happened at 4:02?
cornificius22vain 2 years ago