These views are distorted, and many of these statements contradict eachother. I don't have enough room to analyze all of them, so I'll just comment on the first slide:
No, Homosexuality is not environmentally freindly. If all sexual living things were homosexual, the environment, flowers, birds, and polarbears for that matter, would all die within our generation. At best, homosexuality is a natural means of population control; along with violent crime, war, disease, and natural disasters.
I can assure you that homosexuality amongst humans will greatly benefit the polar bears and besides, of all the natural means of population control you have mentioned, which one do you prefer?
LOL best sums up my reaction to your "philosophies." As a naturally heterosexual person would say, our favorite means of population control is having protected, heterosexual sex. Do you forget that people ELECT to reproduce? I agree we shouldn't, the answer is not to force people to be gay, just like I wouldn't force you to be straight, we just need to be responsible and that seems impossible for most.
NO!!! Didn't I already explain to you that my husband and I DON'T want children- EVER! I hate children, not to mention I value my money, freedom, body, dogs, husband, etc. I recommend looking up "child free" groups on the internet- many of us exist and -gasp- we are straight! This a conscious decision we have made, the images you see on tv as well as most American women does not apply to ALL women, I NEVER want children. There is also a form of insurance called a vasectomy that really helps
These views are distorted, and many of these statements contradict eachother. I don't have enough room to analyze all of them, so I'll just comment on the first slide:
No, Homosexuality is not environmentally freindly. If all sexual living things were homosexual, the environment, flowers, birds, and polarbears for that matter, would all die within our generation. At best, homosexuality is a natural means of population control; along with violent crime, war, disease, and natural disasters.
Phreshnis 3 years ago
I can assure you that homosexuality amongst humans will greatly benefit the polar bears and besides, of all the natural means of population control you have mentioned, which one do you prefer?
thenatureinme 3 years ago
LOL best sums up my reaction to your "philosophies." As a naturally heterosexual person would say, our favorite means of population control is having protected, heterosexual sex. Do you forget that people ELECT to reproduce? I agree we shouldn't, the answer is not to force people to be gay, just like I wouldn't force you to be straight, we just need to be responsible and that seems impossible for most.
allykat44 3 years ago
"Protected sex"...after you had your 2.5 babies, yes!
thenatureinme 3 years ago
NO!!! Didn't I already explain to you that my husband and I DON'T want children- EVER! I hate children, not to mention I value my money, freedom, body, dogs, husband, etc. I recommend looking up "child free" groups on the internet- many of us exist and -gasp- we are straight! This a conscious decision we have made, the images you see on tv as well as most American women does not apply to ALL women, I NEVER want children. There is also a form of insurance called a vasectomy that really helps
allykat44 3 years ago