Why did we risk and lose so many American lives in Europe in WW1 and WW2 again? Other countries like bigmouth friends can drag you into conflicts if you aren't careful. Let them fight their own wars.
wow, so AMERICANS ARE THE BEST AT 'LOBBING' GRENADES,NO 'BLAG', AT ALL.. THEY ARE THE BOYS ON THE BATTLEFIELD.Fuck off, stupid fat yanks. Our SAS annihilated the Germans airpower, took out as many planes as the whole of the RAF had at the time, just going in tooled up to fuck, and going in hard. Americans were industrial in the war, making shit and shipping it 2 us 2 use.. and without Russia, if im honest, Germany would have taken Britain. Then went to war where they could of won against America
@SAMLAD2k6 well I can't necessarily say Britain and Russia did less, but America did contribute. I would hope you wouldn't overwrite the work America did and the sacrifices Americans made, though.
Same too you... I can say America did less, as they did. Americas role was industrial. They also took their time getting involved. But no, I wouldn't 'overwrite' anything... just tell it how it is, they certainly did not win the war. That was Russia, then Britain.
@SAMLAD2k6 russia pulled out before it was over after lenin got into power in the october revolution but america major role like you said was industrial but they joined near the end just so they could say "wow you british and french would have lost if it was not for us" despite the fact germany was on the defence for the most part of the war thats the reason they didnt use tanks as they were a offensive weapon
@eamonnXneverXcoke Russia did not pull out b4 it was over, see Stalingrad. Also, Germans used tanks. You need to talk to your history teacher in school, Eamon.
@SAMLAD2k6 yes they did and you need to get your war right cause if you look it up lenin pulled the russians out and what i ment about the tanks was they didnt use them as effictivley as they were on the defensive just look it up cause i really cant be arsed to explain simple details about the october revolution and why the germans didnt use tanks till ww2 but the tank thing is explained in modern marvels
@SAMLAD2k6 russia surrenderd to germany in 1918 before the war was over they singned the treaty in poland (not sure where) but it was the same point were they split poland in ww2 if you new about the russian civil war it was whites againt reds whites made up of tsarist old government supporters kulacks and THE ALLIES they where involved to force russia back in but when ww1 was over they left thats why the whites lost and it wasnt called stalingrad in ww1
@eamonnXneverXcoke Dunno about WW1, Germany didn't give it a good enough go the first time. Second time around, Russia pushed back Germany in Stalingrad, it was the turning point of the view, and nothing to do with America or England.
which ever specific religious and ethnic group of people rule the majority of the world banks, they sparked off both world wars so that they could claim "historic" land of theirs else where ! not naming names.. its obvious who they are
So.. What I gather from this was that WWI was only won by the Allies because they turtled. Such a unbiased view on history.
xpandapanda 1 year ago 5
@xpandapanda
This is so true. My teacher had been terribly biased.
CTr0n 1 year ago
Why did we risk and lose so many American lives in Europe in WW1 and WW2 again? Other countries like bigmouth friends can drag you into conflicts if you aren't careful. Let them fight their own wars.
JoeyFudd 1 year ago
wow, so AMERICANS ARE THE BEST AT 'LOBBING' GRENADES,NO 'BLAG', AT ALL.. THEY ARE THE BOYS ON THE BATTLEFIELD.Fuck off, stupid fat yanks. Our SAS annihilated the Germans airpower, took out as many planes as the whole of the RAF had at the time, just going in tooled up to fuck, and going in hard. Americans were industrial in the war, making shit and shipping it 2 us 2 use.. and without Russia, if im honest, Germany would have taken Britain. Then went to war where they could of won against America
SAMLAD2k6 1 year ago
@SAMLAD2k6 sounds like youre a little defensive, what's the deal?
MagikalKraker 1 year ago
@MagikalKraker Americans think THEY won the war, that's the deal. Britain and Russia did a lot more to win the war than America did.
SAMLAD2k6 1 year ago
@SAMLAD2k6 well I can't necessarily say Britain and Russia did less, but America did contribute. I would hope you wouldn't overwrite the work America did and the sacrifices Americans made, though.
MagikalKraker 1 year ago
@MagikalKraker
Same too you... I can say America did less, as they did. Americas role was industrial. They also took their time getting involved. But no, I wouldn't 'overwrite' anything... just tell it how it is, they certainly did not win the war. That was Russia, then Britain.
SAMLAD2k6 1 year ago
@SAMLAD2k6 russia pulled out before it was over after lenin got into power in the october revolution but america major role like you said was industrial but they joined near the end just so they could say "wow you british and french would have lost if it was not for us" despite the fact germany was on the defence for the most part of the war thats the reason they didnt use tanks as they were a offensive weapon
eamonnXneverXcoke 1 year ago
@eamonnXneverXcoke Russia did not pull out b4 it was over, see Stalingrad. Also, Germans used tanks. You need to talk to your history teacher in school, Eamon.
SAMLAD2k6 1 year ago
@SAMLAD2k6 yes they did and you need to get your war right cause if you look it up lenin pulled the russians out and what i ment about the tanks was they didnt use them as effictivley as they were on the defensive just look it up cause i really cant be arsed to explain simple details about the october revolution and why the germans didnt use tanks till ww2 but the tank thing is explained in modern marvels
eamonnXneverXcoke 1 year ago
@eamonnXneverXcoke What happend in stalingrad?
SAMLAD2k6 1 year ago
@SAMLAD2k6 russia surrenderd to germany in 1918 before the war was over they singned the treaty in poland (not sure where) but it was the same point were they split poland in ww2 if you new about the russian civil war it was whites againt reds whites made up of tsarist old government supporters kulacks and THE ALLIES they where involved to force russia back in but when ww1 was over they left thats why the whites lost and it wasnt called stalingrad in ww1
eamonnXneverXcoke 1 year ago
@eamonnXneverXcoke Dunno about WW1, Germany didn't give it a good enough go the first time. Second time around, Russia pushed back Germany in Stalingrad, it was the turning point of the view, and nothing to do with America or England.
SAMLAD2k6 1 year ago
@SAMLAD2k6 yes i know all about ww2 but this is ww1
eamonnXneverXcoke 1 year ago
@eamonnXneverXcoke lol i wasnt reading the title of this, just what you put an replying... lets pretend we were talking about WW2, u loose n00b.
SAMLAD2k6 1 year ago
I hope this will never happen again... WW3 would be much more worse than WW1 & 2 together...
Goramagildo 1 year ago
: )
ECTBWHO 1 year ago
More on this subject matter, please.
AnotherFallen1 1 year ago
i'm glad as a people, we've learnt to throw since
domstott86 1 year ago 2
Is Paul McGann narrating this?
TheDoctorWhoNerd 1 year ago
which ever specific religious and ethnic group of people rule the majority of the world banks, they sparked off both world wars so that they could claim "historic" land of theirs else where ! not naming names.. its obvious who they are
ZeeGooner 1 year ago