Nobody listen to this "GrassyKnoller" guy, he's just another crazy conspiracy theorist, who can't seem to take a chill pill, why can't people just be respectful and not worry about it, conspiracies will make you go mad, true fact.
JFK Conspiracy: Worst Foot Forward. VOTE NO to this horrible video! It makes a MOCKERY of US who seek the TRUTH!! The maker of the video is an AGENT of the GOVERNMENT and shows TRUTH SEEKERS as DEFORMED!! VOTE NO!! VOTE NO!!
WE who seek the TRUTH will WIN and discover the TRUTH for AMERICA! This HORRIBLE video MUST be VOTED DOWN!! VOTE NO!! JESSE VENTURA WILL FIND THE TRUTH!! SEEK JESSE SEEK!! OLIVER STONE WILL FILM THE TRUTH!! FILM OLIVER FILM!!
@IcolossusPSN Typical conspiracy theorist; run out of arguments and get trapped by the truth, so you resort to insults; here's one for you; pathetic boob!
@1982Lennon I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!
Let me say this, I...like a lot of people have moved on and the reason is:
You get to a point when you realize that most things are corrupt and it's always been this way... at least as long as I've been on this planet. So this assassination is really nothing new. It was a blow to a lot of people because folks loved the man JFK was, just not the right folks. Not the folks who really pull the strings in this world. Not that much different than today...same as it ever was.
This is not the real Jean Hill! The real Jean Hill was young, naive, and certainly someone who would have washed a man's dishes without complaining about it. The fraud of a woman in this video is old, fat, and butch looking. Surely this woman wouldn't desire to be submissive as that darling young woman who was interviewed right after the tragic tragedy that happened so tragically back in the black and white days in Dallas, Texas. And what's with Darth Vader?
"I jumped out on the street to make him look my way..." She's a discredited fantasist. The Zapruder film shows beyond a shadow of doubt that she a) wasn't on the road and b) SHE WASN'T LOOKING AT JFK WHEN THE HEAD SHOT OCCURED.
Have any of you conspiracy guys actually taken the time to read all of the Warren report? If not, why not? Oh, because it's a fabrication, right? etc etc
@gefnanroolz Warren report is a joke. I've read it, not all 26 volumes but the report itself and if anyone has done any outside research, you would know yourself that it's a joke. Doesn't even take that much research, really.
@FreeMeFromG I've read it and I think the commission deserves a great deal of credit because it has stood the test of time. It's been nearly 50 years since the assassination and there isn't a single conspiracy theory that offers a reasonable explanation of what happened. To this day there isn't a scrap of evidence produced that would cast doubt on the conclusions of the Warren Commission.
@LoneNutter1 There is more than enough evidence... Recently E Howard Hunt admitted to being part of the assassination. United States House Select Committee on Assassinations came to the conclusion based primarily on Dictabelt evidence, was that President Kennedy was assassinated probably as a result of a conspiracy. Even they are not telling the whole truth, clearly.
It's hard to get the Gov, to investigate the Gov. Time and again, they have been caught lying and covering up things.
JFK Conspiracy: Worst Foot Forward. VOTE NO to this horrible video! It makes a MOCKERY of US who seek the TRUTH!! The maker of the video is an AGENT of the GOVERNMENT and shows TRUTH SEEKERS as DEFORMED!! VOTE NO!! VOTE NO!!
WE who seek the TRUTH will WIN and discover the TRUTH for AMERICA! This HORRIBLE video MUST be VOTED DOWN!! VOTE NO!! JESSE VENTURA WILL FIND THE TRUTH!! SEEK JESSE SEEK!! OLIVER STONE WILL FILM THE TRUTH!! FILM OLIVER FILM!!
Look up "JFK Assassination rarely seen 22nd November 1963 Jean Hill interview" on You Tube. Same story Hill has been saying since the day of the shooting.
If any of you people are still buying the single gunman theory, you are completely nuts and you really need to move on to a new fantasy, like 9/11 was pulled off by a man in a cave and a bunch of zealots with box cutters.
@FreeMeFromG When Jean Hill was asked by reporters if she had seen anyone firing at the president she said "no". She told the WC she had not seen any one with a weapon that day. 26 years later she writes in her co-authored book that she saw the shadowy figure of a man with a rifle firing at the president from the grassy knoll.
That is a major, significant change from her original stories. Jean Hill wanted to be famous so she changed her story to achieve that goal. Truth was sacrificed for fame.
@LoneNutter1 Look up "RADIO INTERVIEWS WITH MARY MOORMAN AND JEAN HILL ON NOV. 22, 1963" You will see her story hasn't changed since day one but the warren commission had no problem changing words and statements as it suited them.
In this interview (the day of) she says, some of the motor cops ran up the Hill across from her, where the shots came from. It's at the end of the interview. So clearly the Warren commission is laying.
The interview she gave television reporters matches what she told the Warren Commission. Her story changed dramatically when her book came out. At the time of the assassination she said she did not see anyone with a gun firing at the president from the knoll. 26 years later she says she saw the figure of a man on the knoll firing a rifle at the president. Interestingly, this story came out AFTER the so-called discovery of Badgeman in a photo taken by her friend Mary Moorman.
There is ZERO evidence the Warren Commission changed her story. That's another myth in the long line of conspiracy balderdash the public has had to endure. Jean Hill never had her life threatened. She was making that stuff up to gain attention which in my opinion was her intention from the very first day. Jean Hill is one of those people who had to feel important. When her friend Mary Moorman began to get attention from the photo she took which shows the non-existent Badgeman, Jean
@FreeMeFromG Hill didn't want to be left out the action. So she says the Warren Commission changed her testimony (that's a lie) puts in her book she saw a gunman on the knoll (another lie) and sees the weapon being fired at the president (another lie). She claims she chased after the gunman by dodging between vehicles in the motorcade (another lie-there's photos that show her sitting next to Moorman as the rest of the motorcade passes) Jean Hill intentions were to be famous and make money.
@LoneNutter1 Does it really matter? You are here trying to get your half of second of fame as well. I'm so tired of people who do nothing but distract from the matter at hand. She says she saw, then she didn't see. One thing that has never changed from day one, is that the shots came from the knoll, that hasn't change for Moorman or Hill but if you want to focus on something that nothing but a distraction, be my guest.
@FreeMeFromG Does telling the truth really matter??? Are you serious???? I'm not offering any distractions. I'm citing the evidence that Jean Hill changed her story later in her life. Your accounting of Mary Moorman is 100%false! She was interviewed earlier this year and when asked about where the shots came from she said she didn't know. She and Jean Hill had a falling out due to Hill's inventive imagination. Nobody saw anyone firing at JFK from the knoll yet the CT'ers are fixated on that
@LoneNutter1 I saw one of her initial interviews back then and she DID say that she saw someone running up the hill. She obviously didn't change her story.
@SherryAnn68 Yes , she did say she saw someone running. But when asked if she has seen someone firing a weapon at the president she said no. She told the Warren Commission that she didn't see anyone with a weapon that day.
Seeing someone running and seeing someone with a rifle shooting at the president are two very different things. She clearly changed her story.
@FreeMeFromG landmark. There's ZERO ballistic, physical, forensic or medical evidence JFK was struck from the front or side. All nine pathologists for the HSCA agreed on that fact. But Jean Hill was obsessed on becoming famous and she was willing to sacrifice "truth" in the chase for fame and distinction. She has done a great disservice to the city of Dallas, the State of Texas and to her country.
@LoneNutter1 First off, the Z film is very suspect, for many reasons. Namely that is doesn't make sense. Head rocks back, blood sprays forward. Makes me think (my opinion) that they tried to make that head rock back with a little photo fakery but it didn't work, the best they could do was change the spray direction but that looks bad, so it was hidden away for years because it looked wrong. There are a bunch of people heard shots from the knoll. They have less a reason to lie then the gov.
@FreeMeFromG Go to (ht tp : // mcadams . posc . mu . edu / shots . htm); it contains pie charts of what % of witnesses heard what in terms of location and # of shots. Close all the spaces when typing in (had to do it this way or I get an "Error, try again" message).
@BaronVonSchtupp88 Took a look and I've hear these stats before. Try to tell that to the people who want to believe that our country is above such things. I guess it's just easier to think of it that way for some. I use to get all bothered by it but I don't have the energy or the time for it any longer.
If some want to live in their fantasy, there is really nothing to can say to them. I believe even if it was proven, it really wouldn't change anything, life would go on as it has.
@FreeMeFromG I still believe we are above such things. Odd as it seems that we have the C.I.A. and/or other agencies that have attempted, succeeded, aided or abetted in assassinating or removing from power foreign heads of state for/to the benefit of the U.S. and/or our allies or successors who we wish to curry favor with and that our enemies wish to do the same to us, but I don't see evidence that we'd do that to ourselves. Why stay in the U.S.A. if you think you're gov't is a lot of murderers?
@BaronVonSchtupp88 The world is full of murderers, in that case there's no place for me at all.
Not sure exactly who did it but I can only assume that SOME in the government/military were involved. Those no involved are easy enough to string along with more lies. Like, we know the Castro killed Kennedy but if that gets out it will start WW3 or any other lies you have to say to make others fall in line. Pretty easy stuff. They play chess and the rest of the people play checkers and watch idol.
@BaronVonSchtupp88 At this point it's more of an interest (the assassination) to see how things get twisted and how people like Hill are attacked, how they are discredited, how they keep the lie going and convince others.
I find it helpful in examining what's going on with the world today. Gives you an interesting perspective on current events.
At this point, I'm just sitting back and watching the powerful destroy themselves and if they don't change their path, I have no doubt they will.
@LoneNutter1 Also, Jean Hill is just a tiny part of this sad tale that leads to some really bad places and some really horrible conclusions about this country and the world. You can sit here and nit pick all you want, doesn't change what happened that day and it doesn't fix the corruption inherent in our country and the world. Actually, the corruption is deep in those who have massive wealth, they own the government and they work for the wealthy and powerful.
Here's what Jean Hill told the WC at the end of her testimony: "Well, I know, I have always been rather---I mean, it's not something you are you are not proud to say it, but I think it was part of history and I was glad I was there, but because I got publicity, because I think my children will be interested to know that someday that I was in it someway."
The only thing Jean Hill wanted was fame and the feeling of being important. Too bad she made up stories to achieve that goal.
Don't ever give a thumbs up to fools that talk in caps people. I don't care what they have to say. I see all caps (or mostly) and always give them thumbs down and will never waste my time in reading what they have to yell about.
@IcolossusPSN Would you care to listen and read what Jean Hill said to the press just hours after the assassination and what she said to the Warren Commission and how she changed her story in her book JFK The Last Dissenting Witness"?
I'll be happy to send it to you. I even reference a few videos on YouTube where you can watch and listen to her tell the reporter what she saw and what she didn't see in Dealey Plaza. I'll even send you a web address where you can read from her book what she
@autoad Thanks for sending the information you collected about Jean Hill and her changing story. It was very revealing when you provided a link to a video, her Warren Commission testimony and her book. Hearing her voice, reading the WC transcript and her book brought to life the words of a woman who appeared to abandon truth so she could become famous. It's too bad she lied to thousands of people at the conspiracy conventions and those that bought her book. Great job on finding the information.
JFK Conspiracy: Worst Foot Forward. VOTE NO to this horrible video! It makes a MOCKERY of US who seek the TRUTH!! The maker of the video is an AGENT of the GOVERNMENT and shows TRUTH SEEKERS as DEFORMED!! VOTE NO!! VOTE NO!!
WE who seek the TRUTH will WIN and discover the TRUTH for AMERICA! This HORRIBLE video MUST be VOTED DOWN!! VOTE NO!!
@justclassicalguitar Her book is interesting. But it's a shame the story in the book from the story she told a Dallas television station and her testimony to the Warren Commission dramatically differed. She told the television reporter she didn't see anyone fire a weapon and testified to the Warren Commission she didn't see anyone with a gun. But in 1992 her book is published and for the first time she says she saw the gunman and saw him shooting at the president. She sacrificed truth for fame.
@MIKESOWELL Before I rattle off some counter argument about the claim of the W/C inaccurately reporting what she said I have a few questions and I hope you can provide the answers.
1. What was the earliest date Jean Hill said the Warren Commission did not report her answers accurately?
2. Specifically, what portion or portions of her testimony did they not accurately report?
I will not disguise my opinion of Jean Hill's character. I don't think she was an evil person but she was impressionable.
@autoad I have no idea on any of those questions. I do know this: if I see witnesses on the day of the assassination suddenly dying left and right, I'm not sure if I will "buck the system" either. I think that it is very likely that the Kennedy Assassination was a conspiracy. I think that their is sufficient evidence that the CIA was involved in it. I just think that I can give the late Mrs. Hill the benefit of the doubt.
@MIKESOWELL I don't share your assessment of the involvement of the CIA or there was a conspiracy. As a former believer in a "conspiracy" I've discovered the distortions and misleading information has come from the conspiracy community. I'm not giving the government a pass, but the vast majority of misinformation has come from the conspiracy side of the equation.
Jean Hill's story changed significantly from what she told the Dallas television/radio reporters-the Warren Commission
@MIKESOWELL and what she wrote in her book "JFK-The Last Dissenting Witness". She repeatedly told reporters on Nov 22, 1963 she did not see anyone fire a weapon at the president. She told the Warren Commission four months later she didn't see anyone with a gun that day. However, on page 23 of her book she clearly states she saw "the shadowy figure of a man" holding a rifle. She further asserts on page 24 she saw the man killing the president in front of her very eyes. This is a dramatic change.
@autoad Yeah that is suspicious. You may be right she may have lied to get publicity. Tell me, aside from Mrs. Hill, what are your thoughts on the Kennedy Assassination?
@MIKESOWELL Many years ago I thought JFK was killed by a conspiracy;meaning more than one gunman was involved. The head shot had me convinced there was someone shooting from the front and to the side based on the way his head moved. To make a VERY long story short, I read the book "American Grotesque" and got a very different description of the Clay Shaw trial than what was shown in the film "JFK". Today, I don't think he was felled by a conspiracy for the following reasons; It's been nearly
@MIKESOWELL 50 years since the assassination and I don't see it as probable or possible to have kept a secret that long. There are too many people involved and too many variables and too many people who could have "talked" and brought the entire conspiracy down like a house of cards.
Plus, there are too many different theories. You have different people with different motives using different gunmen using different weapons with different ammo in different locations escaping by different means
@autoad I think there are a lot of people who are nuts and spout off nonsense, people who are just conspiracy theorists etc. But what grabs my attention are facts. The reason why I am so certain that the CIA was involved is because Kennedy was to deliver a speech in Dallas, where he supposedly was going to be critical of certain elements of government. He had spoke of dissolving the CIA. There was ample evidence that the Mafia had a hand in it.
@MIKESOWELL I've not seen a speck of credible evidence the CIA or the Mob was involved in the assassination.
His undelivered speech at the Dallas Trade Mart was "concerning the qualities of successful leadership and the crucial elements to the country's defense and security, such as nuclear power, military strength, foreign aid, supremacy in space, and domestic stability". I'll send you the link directly. YouTube has this thing about sending links by including them in comments.
They said there was no evidence of organized crime being involved "but available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved".
@autoad what really draws a red flag is the back to back successive deaths of Jimmy Hoffa, Sam Giancana, and Johnny Rosselli, all of whom were alleged to have been involved in the assassination JUST before the 1975 reexamination of the Kennedy Assassination. The other theories to me are bogus. There is too much evidence to support it. Even the Watergate tapes elude to it (CIA involvement in the murder).
@MIKESOWELL One could make an interesting argument supporting the notion that all three of the individuals you mention were involved. But to build a solid argument one needs to have a continuous link of evidence that shows the who,what,when,where and how the conspiracy was planned, executed and covered up. Most people are critical of the Warren Report but most people have never read it. But the report didn't say there wasn't a conspiracy. It says they didn't find any evidence of one.
@MIKESOWELL So the door is still open on that matter. I've yet to see any credible evidence that links the Mob or the CIA or the FBI or Big Oil or LBJ or Castro or any of the other 250 different groups or 80 specific individuals who've been accused of participating in the assassination in some manner. We've heard mostly accusations, insinuation, suppositions, guesses about "who did it". But there's a total absence of evidence to support the claims of the conspiracy believers.
@MIKESOWELL Also 1975 happen to be the same year that America finally left S. Vietnam for good.Most people believe JFK was assassinated becuase he probably was not going to commit U.S combat troops. to S. Vietnam.
@MIKESOWELL It's easy to say the Warren Commission got her testimony wrong. But I ask "What did they get wrong"? If her testimony was changed in regards to her seeing a gun that day then how does one explain the interviews she gave the day of the assassination and how they are similar to her testimony?
I suspect Jean Hill got caught up in the excitement of the the historical significance of the assassination and didn't want to be left out. After all, her friend Mary Moorman had a photo that
@MIKESOWELL some people thought had the image of Badgeman. Where once upon a time Jean Hill said she didn't see anyone shooting at the president, with the alleged image of Badgeman now looming it would be convenient to alter her recollections and verify the image of a "shooter". If you read her testimony and listen to her interviews it's clear she didn't make a good witness based on what she said she did during and immediately after the shooting. Photos taken in in Dealey Plaza don't support
@LoneNutter1...... riiiiiight? she was just standing in front of JFK's car when he got hit..shes clearly visible in the Zapruder film, but yeah.she didn't see anything!!
@moparkid440 That's what she told the reporter from the television station shortly after the assassination. She also testified to the same thing (with a slight variation) to the Warren Commission. She changed her story 26 years later when said she saw someone firing a rifle at the president.
Oh but wait...that's right...she was pressured and threatened and numerous attempts were made on her life by the invisible "them" who killed hundreds of witnesses. Silly me. I forgot.
@LoneNutter1 IF you're REALLY concerned about the truth, you INTERVIEW EYEWITNESSES or those CLOSEST to the crime, like Jean Hill or the Newmans, NEITHER of whom were called to testify before the WARANTLESS Commission.
@Soulblackman FYI...The testimony of Mrs. Jean Lollis Hill was taken at 2:30 p.m.. on March 24, 1964, in the office of the U.S. attorney, 301 Post Office Building, Bryan and Ervay Streets, Dallas, Tex., by Mr. Arlen Specter, assistant counsel of the President's Commission.
(This is the Warren Commission in case you haven't figured it out by now which I suspect you haven't)
You can read her testimony in Vol. 6 and it begins on page 205
@LoneNutter1 HEY, I can be wrong, but this would only show how much of a FARCE the Commission IS. An EYEWITNESS tells them she heard more than 3 shots, yet their "conclusion" is just that? What about the Newmans, who were ALSO there? COVERUP, COVERUP, COVERUP to the MAX!
@Soulblackman Huh? You're error shows how much a farce the Commission is? What does that mean??
You stubbed you big toe about Jean Hill not testifying. I think you're confused. Perhaps you need to take a breather, collect your thoughts and check your "facts" before you post another "whoopsie-daisy". I'm glad I was here for you to offer guidance and provide accurate information.
@LoneNutter1 I think YOU need to think WAY OUT the box! Jean Hill was THERE and CLEARLY not part of the CONspiracy that tragically seems to be the case of the Connellys, Geer, Kellernam, HILL et. al. ALL liars! Did u hear about the "set-the-record-straight" book Hill wrote? He had the utter GALL to suggest the reason the agent who'd been pulled away at the LAST minute, shrugged his shoulders in utter DISGUST & CONFUSION was - He was getting ready to go to lunch! ANYONE who believes THAT ...
@LoneNutter1 Even IF I post a "whoopsie-daisy", this does NOT detract from the FACTS that a) JFK's murder was part of a CONSPIRACY, aided and abetted by the Warrantless Commission b) Jean Hill told the TRUTH, making her a SHEROE! c) The Newmans were NEVER asked to testify at this "Commission". Maybe, since they had young children, were advised NOT to even push it, because they did NOT want to make them orphans. So, even with my ADMITTED gaff, I MOVE on, as does the TRUTH!
Jean Hill was an opportunist. There's a video here on YouTube where she and Mary Moorman were interviewed by a television reporter moments after the assassination. She never saw anyone on the knoll shooting. It was years later that somehow her vision improved and memory got sharper when she suddenly began seeing gunmen, rifles, shots fired and...well you know the rest. It's all made up so she could get her 15 minutes of fame. I don't think she's nuts. She's just a shameless exploiter.
@autoad and you are not speaking the truth. Oswald was murdered for the fact that he WAS NOT THE ASSASSIN! Do your research...look at the leaders of government since JFK was killed by insiders of CIA and FBI and Black operations.
@lumeriam I've done my research and it's clear as day Oswald was guilty as sine for slaughtering JFK by shooting him in the back they way a coward would do so.
You appear to take pride in supporting Oswald whan all he was was a malcontent punk who murdered a president in front of unsuspecting men, women and children and then gunned down a police office in cold blood.
Thank goodness this low life piece of excrement never got to enjoy the limelite for his horrible, gutless crimes.
But when? Which story was the truth and which one was the lie?
Regardless, you still called her a liar.
How does it feel to call your "sheroe" a liar?
Didn't you realize you posted a comment that accused your "sheroe" a liar?
(Now I predict that you're going to change the topic because you got yourself caught in a trap where you won't have the courage to admit you goofed up.)
@autoad I ALREADY said, that over time, memory can get a bit compromised, in fact, under duress, not ALL of the pieces are necessarily processed. But after ALL of this, the one FACT we can ALL walk away with is THIS: President John F. Kennedy, on 11/22/63 was assassinated in cold blood, as a result of a CONSPIRACY, quite possibly at the HIGHEST LEVELS of the US GOVERNMENT, which has resulted in nearly 50 years of stonewalling, diversions, an INSULTING "Commission" and other LIES! Jean = SHEROE!
Geez, she just stopped James Earl Jones dead in his tracks with that flip remark about the good-looking motorcycle cop. It's nice that she can be all so cool after being so recently threatened with death. And you know what; she is nuts. She admits to having a policeman boyfriend (while she was married). Also, how come she and her cop friend didn't report this death threat to anybody. Check out this website for her drastically changing story ; mcadams poscmu edu/jhill htm
@chasxyz1234 Of COURSE, Arlen Spector knew better. She was THERE, you were NOT! Something just tells me inside, to believe someone like THAT, over you and the rest of the WC apologists.
@Soulblackman YOUR CAPACITY FOR DELUDING YOURSELF IS ASTOUNDING! Did you focus exclusively on this one video or did you bother to do your homework and read the wildly varying accounts she has given over the years and the lies she has told? She went from She-ro to NERO; (SHE FIDDLED WITH THE STORY AND THE TRUTH GOT BURNED).
@chasxyz1234 I don NOT have to do any more HW to KNOW that JFK was killed as a result of a VAST CONSPIRACY, within HIGH levels of government. People in GENERAL, misspeak over time, because NO ONE'S memory is 100% perfect. CONNELLY said he was shot w/a DIFFERENT bullet, though the "Commission" said it was the same that hit JFK. Jean Hill was a DISSENTING WITNESS and I am PROUD to call her SHEROE!
@Soulblackman Yeah, well Connelly changed his mind too when he was shown evidence of what really happened to himself. Since he had his back to JFK and had been shot and was in a panic, he can be forgiven for his mistaken version of what happened. BOOKS and BRAINS are alike; they don't work when they're SHUT!
@Soulblackman It's nice that YOU know to 100% certainty that the evil gov't killed JFK. How about sharing with the rest of us poor fools the evidence that allows you to know this so assuredly (other than Jean Hill's idiotic blathering)?
Just that opening statement is a lie. She was in fact not the closet person to Kennedy at the time of the shooting. James Earl Jones is just reading from a script so I don't blame him. But Jean Hill is so full of crap. She never has told the truth about what she saw or didn't see .
@VIDEOTIMEMACHINE Very interesting that you told the truth and enough people voted you down because they didn't like what you said, never mind some of their insipid remarks!
@VIDEOTIMEMACHINE She was a HELL of a lot closer than YOU or I, making her UNIQUELY more qualified to speak to what she HEARD and SAW, than ANY of you apologists for the lying, snake-like, pre-scripted "investigation", AKA the WARRANTLESS COMMISSION.
@VIDEOTIMEMACHINE That ONE split second, YES, but the clip shown above, does NOT show everything! JFK had NOT been shot YET!. Jean turned her head afterwards, and saw EXACTLY what happened!
@Soulblackman You haven't done your homework. She was interviewed right after Kennedy was shot and said she was looking a Jackie Kennedy and said she was holding a dog. Fact is she wasn't . She was ans still is a very dishonest woman.
Jean Hill never reported the death threats. Why? Because it never happened. She said she saw smoke from the Grassy Knoll but she wasn't even looking in that direction. She has zero credibility.
@TELEVISIONARCHIVES But the central story was INTACT, that she heard MORE THAN 3 shots! When one sees something of great trauma, it's very difficult to maintain a 100%, laser-sharp recollection of everything. Also, this interview was YEARS later, and it's conceivable she was suffering from slight senility. I BELIEVE HER. I do NOT believe there were just 3 shots. Interesting, ANYONE who has the COUNTER to the WC, is suddenly unreliable or delusional, and their recollection is expected to be 100%
@Soulblackman This is the SAME crap they ran with the Newmans. THINK! Wouldn't you be the LEAST bit curious to interview the people who were CLOSEST to the president when he was shot? But NO, where going to depend SOLELY on people whom they CLAIM, just HAPPENED to see a rifle outside the TSBD.I was born yesterday, but NOT last NIGHT.
@Soulblackman No it wasn't . She wasn't even look at JFK when he was shot. And she never said she saw a man by the grassy knoll for years. She's was full of it.
@TELEVISIONARCHIVES I guess you were there? As I said, the WC was one of the biggest FRAUDS ever! They don't at LEAST interview Hill, Moorman or the NEWMAN'S? Of COURSE not; they didn't fit the SCRIPT!
@Soulblackman If you read Vincent Bugliosi's book "Reclaiming History", especially the chapter she is discussed in, you will see that she has changed her story a number of times. She was not even called as a defense witness by Gerry Spence, who against Mr. Bugliosi, was the defense attorney for Lee Harvey Oswald in the mock trial conducted in 1986, which has been posted on YouTube and is available on DVD.
@chasxyz1234 It's conceivable that over time, one's recollection, especially after such a traumatic event, could alter, which is why it was IMPERATIVE that the WarrantLESS SUSPICION interview her ASAP! She couldn't possible have changed it so much back then. All of this is smoke & mirrors. The Suspicion should have interviewed her as a near WITNESS, then determined if her testimony was reliable. I guess the same for the NEWMANS? Gee, the ones CLOSEST to the murder were NOT called. Yet, I'm
@Soulblackman supposed to rely on the "testimony" of Oswald's [turncoat] "brother", who wasn't even THERE! Jean Hill, her friend and the Newmans were THERE and up CLOSE! And I'm supposed to ignore that because the Warrantless Suspicion, as part of the HOAX, didn't do what they were SUPPOSED to do?
@Soulblackman I don't have the book in f/o me, but her stories changed drastically ( I re-read her portion last night). Her recollection of the # of shots doesn't even jive with the majority of witnesses. Some people just look very rational and sound believable, but can still be self-deluding, liars or just "not all there". There are witnesses who believe the motorcade came to a standstill, when the Zapruder film shows no such thing happened.
@chasxyz1234 She was THERE. The witnesses were THERE! It's a matter of HUMAN REALITY that you'll get nuanced to what happened. Regardless, IF you're TRULY interested in the TRUTH, which is obvious the Suspicion was NOT interested in, you INTERVIEW the witnesses, those who were THERE. Anything else at BEST, speaks to laziness or incompetency and WORSE, a damn COVERUP!
@Soulblackman Yes, we know she was there and there are plenty of photos to prove that, but that still makes her a kook when you read her various testimonies given at different times. And she did testify for the Warren Comm. She said so herself on the video.
@chasxyz1234 The Warrantless Suspicion had NO issue with any supposed kookiness. They simply had NO intention of finding the TRUTH. AGAIN, the Newmans who were ALSO THERE, weren't asked to testify. IF seeking the TRUTH, you leave no stone unturned, ESPECIALLY after the assassination of the PRESIDENT, and using TAXPAYER MONEY!
Respond to this video...I CONSISTENTLY thank GOD for the LAST DISSENTING WITNESS! And DISSENT she did, despite the slander, being OVERLOOKED by the Warrantless Commission, and even in DEATH, the lies being spread by those so guilible, they probably believe in the EASTER BUNNY & the SANDMAN!
@moparkid440 Appreciate it. If there's a shooting on ur block, the detectives might just come to your house to determine if you saw OR heard something. And that's if you were in ur house when the thing went down. It is MINDBOGGLING to think that persons clearly in the film, right by the assassination, weren't asked what they SAW or HEARD! But I guess the "witnesses" that were nowhere near the crime scene were more credible. INCREDIBLE!
@Soulblackman That's odd. Jackie Kennedy, John Connolly, Nellie Connolly , Special Agents Greer ,Kellerman and Hill all testified to the Warren Commission and they were the closest people to the shooting.
You have no idea what you're talking about! All you're doing is repeating screwball Loonspirator nonsense like a parrot!
@autoad ALL, except Jean Hill, the Newmans and the others who were MURDERED (OOPS, I mean, died of "natural causes"), LIED! It was simple; lie or DIE!
@Soulblackman What are you talking about??!! Jackie wasn't killed. Nellie and John Connolly weren't killed. Agents Kellerman, Greer and Hill weren't killed. Jean Hill wasn't killed. The Newman's weren't killed.
Who had their life threatened? Who was killed?? Any evidence of this??
@autoad The OTHERS I was referring to, where the 50+ who "suddenly" died under MYSTERIOUS circumstances, even though it was determined to be statistically IMPOSSIBLE for them to die all so SOON, within such close proximity of each other. If you ask ME, I'll say that perhaps Kellerman, Greer and Hill SHOULD be killed for TREASON and abetting MURDER, if they were NOT threatened. Thank GOD for Jean Hill, an American, no, WORLD She-roe, who stuck to her guns, the TRUTH, no matter the cost.
@autoad She died in 2000, and from the little I read, seemingly under some STRANGE circumstances; right after she was interviewed by Len Osanic. They FINALLY caught up with her. RIP JEAN! Hell is freshly AWAITING the MURDERERS of JFK, and maybe even YOU!
@Soulblackman You are correct about the year she died. It was in 2000.
However, I'm not finding anything about her death being suspicious at all. It would seem logical for her family to have had an autopsy performed if they had reasons to believe she met her demise under suspicious circumstances.
She was interviewed within 40 minutes of the shooting by a newspaper and a TV reporter and she said "she saw nobody with a gun". Somebody must have gotten to her immediately after the shooting to put
@Soulblackman pressure on her not to talk about what she really saw. But 26 years later she emerges with a story about witnessing someone firing a gun at the president from the knoll and chasing a man she said was Jack Ruby. Let's see 1963 plus 26 years..that means she told this new story in 1989. She died in 2000. That makes 11 years from the new story until she died and you said "under some STRANGE circumstances".
Are we to believe that this big, evil, sinister, governmental machine who
@autoad I just found it interesting, that after being threatened with death, she DIES pretty soon after the book was published. Just CAN'T help but wondering.
@Soulblackman Well you made another mistake. Last Dissenting Witness was published in 1992. Jean Hill died in 2000. "She dies pretty soon after the book was published"
That's 8 years she was prancing around selling and telling a lie.
And it took the government 8 years to track her down and eliminate her to keep her quiet?
I'm sure the government knew she was writing a book. Why didn't they bump her off before she could write it?
Once the book was published it seems silly to get rid of her.
@autoad U make a very GOOD point about the timing. Whether or not I made a MISTAKE, does NOT detract that Jean Hill was a WITNESS to the murder! Even IF she wasn't bumped off, NOTHING changes of her being a VALUABLE, CREDIBLE witness to the CONSPIRACY!
@Soulblackman There's no doubt Jean Hill saw something. But I'm still deciding which story she told was the truth and which one was the lie. I suspect her first story;the one she told the television reporter and the one she told to the Warren Commission was close to what she really saw.
The second story, was the lie.
And how you're able to justify celebrating the lying Jean Hill is a complete and total mystery. You're inconsistent in your use of "logic" is clear and convincing.
@autoad Let's get right down to the chase - AGAIN. On Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, while on a motorcade route through downtown, was shot and killed, as a result of a CONSPIRACY. Whatever misspeaks, real or actual from Jean Hill, it does NOT change that simple FACT! She was there, I wasn't. You Warrantless Commission apologists crack me UP, with your tooth-fairy, Santa Claus, Sandman mentalities.
@Soulblackman Frankly speaking, it's a fact that a conspiracy has not been proven in the assassination of JFK. You can insist all you want that he was killed by a conspiracy but that doesn't make it so.
What is factual are Jean Hill's comments that were recorded/filmed minutes after the assassination when she said she didn't see anyone with a gun. She told the same story ,under oath to be truthful, to the Warren Commission. It's a fact she changed her story 26 years later.
@autoad I don't care if she changed it 6 MINUTES later. At the blur of a moment, after seeing such trauma, the mind has a tendency to plays tricks on one's self. As I said before, she could have been displaying genuine signs of senility or just plain, memory loss. I BELIEVE her, and by virtue of the fact there [SURPRISINGLY] around, who STILL believe the Lone Nut THEORY, goes to show how GULLIBLE people can be. The conspiracy to assassinate JFK is BIGGER than ANY 1 person, INCLUDING Jean Hill.
@Soulblackman Now you're an expert on Post Somatic Stress Syndrome? And you're speculating a diagnosis on someone you've never known. Actually, it sounds like you're making excuses for her lies. I suppose one can justify any behavior as long as it emanates from someone we hold in high regard. I also suspect you'd defend Jean Hill no regardless of what she said or did. Clearly, you've lost your ability to be objective and your obsession with her has clouded your thinking in spite of her lies.
@autoad On 11/22/63, JFK was assassinated by at LEAST 1 assassin. Witnesses, INCLUDING Jean Hill (Hell, I should call her JEAN of Arc!), said that there were MORE than 3 shots, rendering the Warren Commission a sham and a LIE, as they were the organ of the US government COVERUP to what really happened. Were it NOT for Jean Hill and other BRAVE SOULS, untold MILLIONS, much like YOU, would be deceived FOREVER, in the fairy-tale, Santa Claus, Tooth-fairy, Sandman, Easter Bunny "official version".
@Soulblackman Most of the people in Dealey Plaza heard 3 shots. I can easily understand why some thought they heard more than 3 because of the echos. By your criticism of the Warren Commission are you suggesting the earwitnesses who heard 3 shots were part of the alleged cover-up?
You're free to heap on as much positive accolades to Jean Hill. But you'll never be able to justify or properly explain why she fabricated a story about what she saw. In my opinion, and it's only an opinion
@Soulblackman that she became jealous of her friend Mary Moorman because Mary had taken a photograph that became famous 19 years after it was taken. This is the photo that some people claim has the image of "Badgeman". Mary Moorman was now the center of attention and her good friend who was standing right next to her was rapidly becoming an obscure footnote in history. The "Badgeman" story was Jean Hill's ticket to credibility. Even though Jean Hill had told a television reporter and the Warren
@Soulblackman she did not see anyone with a gun that day, she invents a new story that puts her right in the middle of this historic event.
Jean Hill may have thought her name would last forever for what she said she saw. But she'll be remembered for what she didn't see and her obviously fabricated and fictitious story.
@Soulblackman You can engage in name-calling, making insults and diminishment. But it dosen't change a thing when it comes to facts.
Some people are bewildered why Jean Hill would tell the same story twice and then 26 years later change her story significantly. Then she writes a book about what she "saw", signs autographs in red ink and wears red outfits because she was "the women in red" in the Zapruder film. Meanwhile, she was making money from her changed story from book sales, appearences
SCARY INTERVIEW.....SHE HAS BEEN THREATENED....SCARY
our fed. Gov. Can be quite frightening. She didn't go 2 DC because she feared for her life......
sodolafa 2 weeks ago
jean hill was hot in 1963. damn she went ugly lol
ChristianHolloway7 1 month ago
She's right about one thing...Arlen Specter was a POS than and still IS a POS LIAR!!!
sproutgerkin 2 months ago
What a class act! Jean is a courageous woman unafraid to speak truth to power. We need more Americans like her.
lzambeni 3 months ago
she's frickin nuts. crazy as a loon.
dennisiscool14 3 months ago
@dennisiscool14 lol, so true!!
peteo100 1 month ago
her story seems to have warped over time
DCUPtoejuice 3 months ago
@DCUPtoejuice not saying i believe this conspiracy but her story didn't change
/watch?v=QWl06BLg3Kk&feature=related
Knightrem 2 months ago
Jeans account of that day is proof that there was more than one assassin that took out President Kennedy, asides from Oswald.
LightningStash 3 months ago
lier lier lier LIER cant even look up
MrFERG13 3 months ago
Nobody listen to this "GrassyKnoller" guy, he's just another crazy conspiracy theorist, who can't seem to take a chill pill, why can't people just be respectful and not worry about it, conspiracies will make you go mad, true fact.
mafiamanj15 5 months ago
JFK Conspiracy: Worst Foot Forward. VOTE NO to this horrible video! It makes a MOCKERY of US who seek the TRUTH!! The maker of the video is an AGENT of the GOVERNMENT and shows TRUTH SEEKERS as DEFORMED!! VOTE NO!! VOTE NO!!
WE who seek the TRUTH will WIN and discover the TRUTH for AMERICA! This HORRIBLE video MUST be VOTED DOWN!! VOTE NO!! JESSE VENTURA WILL FIND THE TRUTH!! SEEK JESSE SEEK!! OLIVER STONE WILL FILM THE TRUTH!! FILM OLIVER FILM!!
I'M BACK DAMN IT!! I'VE BEEN AWAY TOO LONG!!!
GrassyKnoller 5 months ago
@GrassyKnoller Jesse VEntura didn't even notice when Cowboy Bob Orton used a cast on Mr. T.
andrelebaron 3 months ago
@GrassyKnoller
good luck...
captainkavern 1 month ago
Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends, I'm so glad you could attend, come inside.......come inside.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
@IcolossusPSN Typical conspiracy theorist; run out of arguments and get trapped by the truth, so you resort to insults; here's one for you; pathetic boob!
BaronVonSchtupp88 6 months ago
@BaronVonSchtupp88 You're easy to manipulate
1982Lennon 5 months ago
@1982Lennon I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! I WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!! I HAVE RIGHTS!
GrassyKnoller 5 months ago
@GrassyKnoller Chill out
1982Lennon 5 months ago
Let me say this, I...like a lot of people have moved on and the reason is:
You get to a point when you realize that most things are corrupt and it's always been this way... at least as long as I've been on this planet. So this assassination is really nothing new. It was a blow to a lot of people because folks loved the man JFK was, just not the right folks. Not the folks who really pull the strings in this world. Not that much different than today...same as it ever was.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
This is not the real Jean Hill! The real Jean Hill was young, naive, and certainly someone who would have washed a man's dishes without complaining about it. The fraud of a woman in this video is old, fat, and butch looking. Surely this woman wouldn't desire to be submissive as that darling young woman who was interviewed right after the tragic tragedy that happened so tragically back in the black and white days in Dallas, Texas. And what's with Darth Vader?
MisterNifty 6 months ago
"I jumped out on the street to make him look my way..." She's a discredited fantasist. The Zapruder film shows beyond a shadow of doubt that she a) wasn't on the road and b) SHE WASN'T LOOKING AT JFK WHEN THE HEAD SHOT OCCURED.
Have any of you conspiracy guys actually taken the time to read all of the Warren report? If not, why not? Oh, because it's a fabrication, right? etc etc
gefnanroolz 6 months ago
@gefnanroolz Warren report is a joke. I've read it, not all 26 volumes but the report itself and if anyone has done any outside research, you would know yourself that it's a joke. Doesn't even take that much research, really.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
@FreeMeFromG I've read it and I think the commission deserves a great deal of credit because it has stood the test of time. It's been nearly 50 years since the assassination and there isn't a single conspiracy theory that offers a reasonable explanation of what happened. To this day there isn't a scrap of evidence produced that would cast doubt on the conclusions of the Warren Commission.
LoneNutter1 6 months ago
@LoneNutter1 There is more than enough evidence... Recently E Howard Hunt admitted to being part of the assassination. United States House Select Committee on Assassinations came to the conclusion based primarily on Dictabelt evidence, was that President Kennedy was assassinated probably as a result of a conspiracy. Even they are not telling the whole truth, clearly.
It's hard to get the Gov, to investigate the Gov. Time and again, they have been caught lying and covering up things.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JFK Conspiracy: Worst Foot Forward. VOTE NO to this horrible video! It makes a MOCKERY of US who seek the TRUTH!! The maker of the video is an AGENT of the GOVERNMENT and shows TRUTH SEEKERS as DEFORMED!! VOTE NO!! VOTE NO!!
WE who seek the TRUTH will WIN and discover the TRUTH for AMERICA! This HORRIBLE video MUST be VOTED DOWN!! VOTE NO!! JESSE VENTURA WILL FIND THE TRUTH!! SEEK JESSE SEEK!! OLIVER STONE WILL FILM THE TRUTH!! FILM OLIVER FILM!!
I'M BACK DAMN IT!! I'VE BEEN AWAY TOO LONG!!!
GrassyKnoller 6 months ago
@GrassyKnoller Go away, nobody has missed you. As the old saying goes " The village called, they want their idiot back".
BaronVonSchtupp88 6 months ago
Look up "JFK Assassination rarely seen 22nd November 1963 Jean Hill interview" on You Tube. Same story Hill has been saying since the day of the shooting.
If any of you people are still buying the single gunman theory, you are completely nuts and you really need to move on to a new fantasy, like 9/11 was pulled off by a man in a cave and a bunch of zealots with box cutters.
FreeMeFromG 7 months ago
@FreeMeFromG When Jean Hill was asked by reporters if she had seen anyone firing at the president she said "no". She told the WC she had not seen any one with a weapon that day. 26 years later she writes in her co-authored book that she saw the shadowy figure of a man with a rifle firing at the president from the grassy knoll.
That is a major, significant change from her original stories. Jean Hill wanted to be famous so she changed her story to achieve that goal. Truth was sacrificed for fame.
LoneNutter1 6 months ago
@LoneNutter1 Look up "RADIO INTERVIEWS WITH MARY MOORMAN AND JEAN HILL ON NOV. 22, 1963" You will see her story hasn't changed since day one but the warren commission had no problem changing words and statements as it suited them.
In this interview (the day of) she says, some of the motor cops ran up the Hill across from her, where the shots came from. It's at the end of the interview. So clearly the Warren commission is laying.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
@FreeMeFromG
The interview she gave television reporters matches what she told the Warren Commission. Her story changed dramatically when her book came out. At the time of the assassination she said she did not see anyone with a gun firing at the president from the knoll. 26 years later she says she saw the figure of a man on the knoll firing a rifle at the president. Interestingly, this story came out AFTER the so-called discovery of Badgeman in a photo taken by her friend Mary Moorman.
LoneNutter1 6 months ago
@FreeMeFromG
There is ZERO evidence the Warren Commission changed her story. That's another myth in the long line of conspiracy balderdash the public has had to endure. Jean Hill never had her life threatened. She was making that stuff up to gain attention which in my opinion was her intention from the very first day. Jean Hill is one of those people who had to feel important. When her friend Mary Moorman began to get attention from the photo she took which shows the non-existent Badgeman, Jean
LoneNutter1 6 months ago
@FreeMeFromG Hill didn't want to be left out the action. So she says the Warren Commission changed her testimony (that's a lie) puts in her book she saw a gunman on the knoll (another lie) and sees the weapon being fired at the president (another lie). She claims she chased after the gunman by dodging between vehicles in the motorcade (another lie-there's photos that show her sitting next to Moorman as the rest of the motorcade passes) Jean Hill intentions were to be famous and make money.
LoneNutter1 6 months ago 2
@LoneNutter1 Does it really matter? You are here trying to get your half of second of fame as well. I'm so tired of people who do nothing but distract from the matter at hand. She says she saw, then she didn't see. One thing that has never changed from day one, is that the shots came from the knoll, that hasn't change for Moorman or Hill but if you want to focus on something that nothing but a distraction, be my guest.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
@FreeMeFromG Does telling the truth really matter??? Are you serious???? I'm not offering any distractions. I'm citing the evidence that Jean Hill changed her story later in her life. Your accounting of Mary Moorman is 100%false! She was interviewed earlier this year and when asked about where the shots came from she said she didn't know. She and Jean Hill had a falling out due to Hill's inventive imagination. Nobody saw anyone firing at JFK from the knoll yet the CT'ers are fixated on that
LoneNutter1 6 months ago
@LoneNutter1 I saw one of her initial interviews back then and she DID say that she saw someone running up the hill. She obviously didn't change her story.
SherryAnn68 6 months ago
@SherryAnn68 Yes , she did say she saw someone running. But when asked if she has seen someone firing a weapon at the president she said no. She told the Warren Commission that she didn't see anyone with a weapon that day.
Seeing someone running and seeing someone with a rifle shooting at the president are two very different things. She clearly changed her story.
LoneNutter1 6 months ago
@LoneNutter1 PS: you can have the last word... I'm done with the little things...
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
@FreeMeFromG Ah yes...a little thing. Seeing someone shooting at the president is "a little thing".
LoneNutter1 6 months ago
@FreeMeFromG landmark. There's ZERO ballistic, physical, forensic or medical evidence JFK was struck from the front or side. All nine pathologists for the HSCA agreed on that fact. But Jean Hill was obsessed on becoming famous and she was willing to sacrifice "truth" in the chase for fame and distinction. She has done a great disservice to the city of Dallas, the State of Texas and to her country.
LoneNutter1 6 months ago 2
@LoneNutter1 First off, the Z film is very suspect, for many reasons. Namely that is doesn't make sense. Head rocks back, blood sprays forward. Makes me think (my opinion) that they tried to make that head rock back with a little photo fakery but it didn't work, the best they could do was change the spray direction but that looks bad, so it was hidden away for years because it looked wrong. There are a bunch of people heard shots from the knoll. They have less a reason to lie then the gov.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
@FreeMeFromG Go to (ht tp : // mcadams . posc . mu . edu / shots . htm); it contains pie charts of what % of witnesses heard what in terms of location and # of shots. Close all the spaces when typing in (had to do it this way or I get an "Error, try again" message).
BaronVonSchtupp88 6 months ago
@BaronVonSchtupp88 Took a look and I've hear these stats before. Try to tell that to the people who want to believe that our country is above such things. I guess it's just easier to think of it that way for some. I use to get all bothered by it but I don't have the energy or the time for it any longer.
If some want to live in their fantasy, there is really nothing to can say to them. I believe even if it was proven, it really wouldn't change anything, life would go on as it has.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
@FreeMeFromG I still believe we are above such things. Odd as it seems that we have the C.I.A. and/or other agencies that have attempted, succeeded, aided or abetted in assassinating or removing from power foreign heads of state for/to the benefit of the U.S. and/or our allies or successors who we wish to curry favor with and that our enemies wish to do the same to us, but I don't see evidence that we'd do that to ourselves. Why stay in the U.S.A. if you think you're gov't is a lot of murderers?
BaronVonSchtupp88 6 months ago
@BaronVonSchtupp88 The world is full of murderers, in that case there's no place for me at all.
Not sure exactly who did it but I can only assume that SOME in the government/military were involved. Those no involved are easy enough to string along with more lies. Like, we know the Castro killed Kennedy but if that gets out it will start WW3 or any other lies you have to say to make others fall in line. Pretty easy stuff. They play chess and the rest of the people play checkers and watch idol.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
@BaronVonSchtupp88 At this point it's more of an interest (the assassination) to see how things get twisted and how people like Hill are attacked, how they are discredited, how they keep the lie going and convince others.
I find it helpful in examining what's going on with the world today. Gives you an interesting perspective on current events.
At this point, I'm just sitting back and watching the powerful destroy themselves and if they don't change their path, I have no doubt they will.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
@LoneNutter1 Also, Jean Hill is just a tiny part of this sad tale that leads to some really bad places and some really horrible conclusions about this country and the world. You can sit here and nit pick all you want, doesn't change what happened that day and it doesn't fix the corruption inherent in our country and the world. Actually, the corruption is deep in those who have massive wealth, they own the government and they work for the wealthy and powerful.
FreeMeFromG 6 months ago
Here's what Jean Hill told the WC at the end of her testimony: "Well, I know, I have always been rather---I mean, it's not something you are you are not proud to say it, but I think it was part of history and I was glad I was there, but because I got publicity, because I think my children will be interested to know that someday that I was in it someway."
The only thing Jean Hill wanted was fame and the feeling of being important. Too bad she made up stories to achieve that goal.
LoneNutter1 7 months ago
Don't ever give a thumbs up to fools that talk in caps people. I don't care what they have to say. I see all caps (or mostly) and always give them thumbs down and will never waste my time in reading what they have to yell about.
Danbo342 8 months ago
@IcolossusPSN wrote 26 years later and how he story changed significantly!
Or are you too cowardly and scared and you'd rather make personal attacks against me?
I think you're scared and cowardly.
The same way bin Laden was before he got whacked!
autoad 9 months ago
@IcolossusPSN Would you care to listen and read what Jean Hill said to the press just hours after the assassination and what she said to the Warren Commission and how she changed her story in her book JFK The Last Dissenting Witness"?
I'll be happy to send it to you. I even reference a few videos on YouTube where you can watch and listen to her tell the reporter what she saw and what she didn't see in Dealey Plaza. I'll even send you a web address where you can read from her book what she
autoad 9 months ago
@autoad Thanks for sending the information you collected about Jean Hill and her changing story. It was very revealing when you provided a link to a video, her Warren Commission testimony and her book. Hearing her voice, reading the WC transcript and her book brought to life the words of a woman who appeared to abandon truth so she could become famous. It's too bad she lied to thousands of people at the conspiracy conventions and those that bought her book. Great job on finding the information.
LoneNutter1 9 months ago 2
@IcolossusPSN Why don't you activate your brain and be a little more specific because right now, you're the moron.
autoad 9 months ago
JFK Conspiracy: Worst Foot Forward. VOTE NO to this horrible video! It makes a MOCKERY of US who seek the TRUTH!! The maker of the video is an AGENT of the GOVERNMENT and shows TRUTH SEEKERS as DEFORMED!! VOTE NO!! VOTE NO!!
WE who seek the TRUTH will WIN and discover the TRUTH for AMERICA! This HORRIBLE video MUST be VOTED DOWN!! VOTE NO!!
GrassyKnoller 10 months ago
@GrassyKnoller dude take a pill or something. Not that important.
barracudacool 10 months ago
@GrassyKnoller grassyknoller, Shhhhhhhhhhh!!!!
RJiminez51 7 months ago
read her book, it will blow your mind!!
justclassicalguitar 11 months ago
@justclassicalguitar Her book is interesting. But it's a shame the story in the book from the story she told a Dallas television station and her testimony to the Warren Commission dramatically differed. She told the television reporter she didn't see anyone fire a weapon and testified to the Warren Commission she didn't see anyone with a gun. But in 1992 her book is published and for the first time she says she saw the gunman and saw him shooting at the president. She sacrificed truth for fame.
autoad 10 months ago
@autoad Well, from what I have read she has said that the Warren Commission did not report accurately what she had actually said.
MIKESOWELL 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL Before I rattle off some counter argument about the claim of the W/C inaccurately reporting what she said I have a few questions and I hope you can provide the answers.
1. What was the earliest date Jean Hill said the Warren Commission did not report her answers accurately?
2. Specifically, what portion or portions of her testimony did they not accurately report?
I will not disguise my opinion of Jean Hill's character. I don't think she was an evil person but she was impressionable.
autoad 10 months ago
@autoad I have no idea on any of those questions. I do know this: if I see witnesses on the day of the assassination suddenly dying left and right, I'm not sure if I will "buck the system" either. I think that it is very likely that the Kennedy Assassination was a conspiracy. I think that their is sufficient evidence that the CIA was involved in it. I just think that I can give the late Mrs. Hill the benefit of the doubt.
MIKESOWELL 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL I don't share your assessment of the involvement of the CIA or there was a conspiracy. As a former believer in a "conspiracy" I've discovered the distortions and misleading information has come from the conspiracy community. I'm not giving the government a pass, but the vast majority of misinformation has come from the conspiracy side of the equation.
Jean Hill's story changed significantly from what she told the Dallas television/radio reporters-the Warren Commission
autoad 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL and what she wrote in her book "JFK-The Last Dissenting Witness". She repeatedly told reporters on Nov 22, 1963 she did not see anyone fire a weapon at the president. She told the Warren Commission four months later she didn't see anyone with a gun that day. However, on page 23 of her book she clearly states she saw "the shadowy figure of a man" holding a rifle. She further asserts on page 24 she saw the man killing the president in front of her very eyes. This is a dramatic change.
autoad 10 months ago
@autoad Yeah that is suspicious. You may be right she may have lied to get publicity. Tell me, aside from Mrs. Hill, what are your thoughts on the Kennedy Assassination?
MIKESOWELL 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL Many years ago I thought JFK was killed by a conspiracy;meaning more than one gunman was involved. The head shot had me convinced there was someone shooting from the front and to the side based on the way his head moved. To make a VERY long story short, I read the book "American Grotesque" and got a very different description of the Clay Shaw trial than what was shown in the film "JFK". Today, I don't think he was felled by a conspiracy for the following reasons; It's been nearly
autoad 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL 50 years since the assassination and I don't see it as probable or possible to have kept a secret that long. There are too many people involved and too many variables and too many people who could have "talked" and brought the entire conspiracy down like a house of cards.
Plus, there are too many different theories. You have different people with different motives using different gunmen using different weapons with different ammo in different locations escaping by different means
autoad 10 months ago
@autoad I think there are a lot of people who are nuts and spout off nonsense, people who are just conspiracy theorists etc. But what grabs my attention are facts. The reason why I am so certain that the CIA was involved is because Kennedy was to deliver a speech in Dallas, where he supposedly was going to be critical of certain elements of government. He had spoke of dissolving the CIA. There was ample evidence that the Mafia had a hand in it.
MIKESOWELL 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL I've not seen a speck of credible evidence the CIA or the Mob was involved in the assassination.
His undelivered speech at the Dallas Trade Mart was "concerning the qualities of successful leadership and the crucial elements to the country's defense and security, such as nuclear power, military strength, foreign aid, supremacy in space, and domestic stability". I'll send you the link directly. YouTube has this thing about sending links by including them in comments.
autoad 10 months ago
@autoad The HSCA ruled in their report that the Mafia was involved in JFK' s death
jfiles000000 9 months ago
@jfiles000000
You are 100% wrong!
They said there was no evidence of organized crime being involved "but available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved".
You're making up nonsense as always.
autoad 9 months ago
@autoad what really draws a red flag is the back to back successive deaths of Jimmy Hoffa, Sam Giancana, and Johnny Rosselli, all of whom were alleged to have been involved in the assassination JUST before the 1975 reexamination of the Kennedy Assassination. The other theories to me are bogus. There is too much evidence to support it. Even the Watergate tapes elude to it (CIA involvement in the murder).
MIKESOWELL 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL One could make an interesting argument supporting the notion that all three of the individuals you mention were involved. But to build a solid argument one needs to have a continuous link of evidence that shows the who,what,when,where and how the conspiracy was planned, executed and covered up. Most people are critical of the Warren Report but most people have never read it. But the report didn't say there wasn't a conspiracy. It says they didn't find any evidence of one.
autoad 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL So the door is still open on that matter. I've yet to see any credible evidence that links the Mob or the CIA or the FBI or Big Oil or LBJ or Castro or any of the other 250 different groups or 80 specific individuals who've been accused of participating in the assassination in some manner. We've heard mostly accusations, insinuation, suppositions, guesses about "who did it". But there's a total absence of evidence to support the claims of the conspiracy believers.
autoad 10 months ago
@autoad Well, what do you think of the Yitzhak Rabin murder? I think that one is even more obviously suspicious.
MIKESOWELL 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL I don't know and it would be inappropriate for me to say for it would be purely speculative.
autoad 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL Also 1975 happen to be the same year that America finally left S. Vietnam for good.Most people believe JFK was assassinated becuase he probably was not going to commit U.S combat troops. to S. Vietnam.
jfiles000000 9 months ago
@MIKESOWELL the entire thing is covered up by different people.
All of the theories can't be right. Which means most or all of them are wrong.
autoad 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL It's easy to say the Warren Commission got her testimony wrong. But I ask "What did they get wrong"? If her testimony was changed in regards to her seeing a gun that day then how does one explain the interviews she gave the day of the assassination and how they are similar to her testimony?
I suspect Jean Hill got caught up in the excitement of the the historical significance of the assassination and didn't want to be left out. After all, her friend Mary Moorman had a photo that
autoad 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL some people thought had the image of Badgeman. Where once upon a time Jean Hill said she didn't see anyone shooting at the president, with the alleged image of Badgeman now looming it would be convenient to alter her recollections and verify the image of a "shooter". If you read her testimony and listen to her interviews it's clear she didn't make a good witness based on what she said she did during and immediately after the shooting. Photos taken in in Dealey Plaza don't support
autoad 10 months ago
@MIKESOWELL what she said she did and when she did them.
autoad 10 months ago
this woman was a proven liar, she never told the same story twice..
grettoz 1 year ago
Jean Hill didn't see a damn thing! She took advantage of a tragic national event and made up stuff just so she would be "famous".
LoneNutter1 1 year ago
@LoneNutter1...... riiiiiight? she was just standing in front of JFK's car when he got hit..shes clearly visible in the Zapruder film, but yeah.she didn't see anything!!
moparkid440 11 months ago
@moparkid440 That's what she told the reporter from the television station shortly after the assassination. She also testified to the same thing (with a slight variation) to the Warren Commission. She changed her story 26 years later when said she saw someone firing a rifle at the president.
Oh but wait...that's right...she was pressured and threatened and numerous attempts were made on her life by the invisible "them" who killed hundreds of witnesses. Silly me. I forgot.
Balderdash.
LoneNutter1 11 months ago 2
@LoneNutter1 IF you're REALLY concerned about the truth, you INTERVIEW EYEWITNESSES or those CLOSEST to the crime, like Jean Hill or the Newmans, NEITHER of whom were called to testify before the WARANTLESS Commission.
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman FYI...The testimony of Mrs. Jean Lollis Hill was taken at 2:30 p.m.. on March 24, 1964, in the office of the U.S. attorney, 301 Post Office Building, Bryan and Ervay Streets, Dallas, Tex., by Mr. Arlen Specter, assistant counsel of the President's Commission.
(This is the Warren Commission in case you haven't figured it out by now which I suspect you haven't)
You can read her testimony in Vol. 6 and it begins on page 205
Now what were you saying about the truth?
LoneNutter1 11 months ago
@LoneNutter1 HEY, I can be wrong, but this would only show how much of a FARCE the Commission IS. An EYEWITNESS tells them she heard more than 3 shots, yet their "conclusion" is just that? What about the Newmans, who were ALSO there? COVERUP, COVERUP, COVERUP to the MAX!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman Huh? You're error shows how much a farce the Commission is? What does that mean??
You stubbed you big toe about Jean Hill not testifying. I think you're confused. Perhaps you need to take a breather, collect your thoughts and check your "facts" before you post another "whoopsie-daisy". I'm glad I was here for you to offer guidance and provide accurate information.
LoneNutter1 11 months ago
@LoneNutter1 I think YOU need to think WAY OUT the box! Jean Hill was THERE and CLEARLY not part of the CONspiracy that tragically seems to be the case of the Connellys, Geer, Kellernam, HILL et. al. ALL liars! Did u hear about the "set-the-record-straight" book Hill wrote? He had the utter GALL to suggest the reason the agent who'd been pulled away at the LAST minute, shrugged his shoulders in utter DISGUST & CONFUSION was - He was getting ready to go to lunch! ANYONE who believes THAT ...
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@LoneNutter1 ate some SPECIAL BROWNIES for lunch!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@LoneNutter1 Even IF I post a "whoopsie-daisy", this does NOT detract from the FACTS that a) JFK's murder was part of a CONSPIRACY, aided and abetted by the Warrantless Commission b) Jean Hill told the TRUTH, making her a SHEROE! c) The Newmans were NEVER asked to testify at this "Commission". Maybe, since they had young children, were advised NOT to even push it, because they did NOT want to make them orphans. So, even with my ADMITTED gaff, I MOVE on, as does the TRUTH!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman
That's nice.
Where's the proof?
LoneNutter1 11 months ago
@moparkid440 Of course NOT! Only CBS, NBC and the Warren Commission knew what happened. Everyone else is BLIND or lying!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
Jean Hill was an opportunist. There's a video here on YouTube where she and Mary Moorman were interviewed by a television reporter moments after the assassination. She never saw anyone on the knoll shooting. It was years later that somehow her vision improved and memory got sharper when she suddenly began seeing gunmen, rifles, shots fired and...well you know the rest. It's all made up so she could get her 15 minutes of fame. I don't think she's nuts. She's just a shameless exploiter.
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad and your statement makes people wonder who you are.
lumeriam 1 year ago
@lumeriam The truth is the truth regardless of who says it.
Jean Hill was a common opportunist who took advantage of a brutal murder by a low-life slug named Oswald.
autoad 1 year ago 5
@autoad and you are not speaking the truth. Oswald was murdered for the fact that he WAS NOT THE ASSASSIN! Do your research...look at the leaders of government since JFK was killed by insiders of CIA and FBI and Black operations.
lumeriam 1 year ago
@lumeriam I've done my research and it's clear as day Oswald was guilty as sine for slaughtering JFK by shooting him in the back they way a coward would do so.
You appear to take pride in supporting Oswald whan all he was was a malcontent punk who murdered a president in front of unsuspecting men, women and children and then gunned down a police office in cold blood.
Thank goodness this low life piece of excrement never got to enjoy the limelite for his horrible, gutless crimes.
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad Just learn how to spell for Christsake! PEOPLE LISTEN! If you can't spell, nobody gives a shit about what you have to say. My god...
mattowos 1 year ago
@mattowos Sure they do!
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad I have 2 things to say regarding Jean Hill: 1) You GO, Girl 2) Rest in PEACE!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@autoad Amen!
IwshIcldstrtover 11 months ago
@autoad She took the opportunity to tell the TRUTH, thus her RIGHTFUL title of the Last Dissenting Witness! WHATTA GAL! WHATTA SOUL!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman You're right, she did tell the truth.
But when? Which story was the truth and which one was the lie?
Regardless, you still called her a liar.
How does it feel to call your "sheroe" a liar?
Didn't you realize you posted a comment that accused your "sheroe" a liar?
(Now I predict that you're going to change the topic because you got yourself caught in a trap where you won't have the courage to admit you goofed up.)
It doesn't matter.
We can all see your mistake.
Loons.
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad I ALREADY said, that over time, memory can get a bit compromised, in fact, under duress, not ALL of the pieces are necessarily processed. But after ALL of this, the one FACT we can ALL walk away with is THIS: President John F. Kennedy, on 11/22/63 was assassinated in cold blood, as a result of a CONSPIRACY, quite possibly at the HIGHEST LEVELS of the US GOVERNMENT, which has resulted in nearly 50 years of stonewalling, diversions, an INSULTING "Commission" and other LIES! Jean = SHEROE!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman So are you saying the second story she told;the one where she saw someone firing from the knoll was the lie?
One of the stories she told was a lie. You can't have her telling the truth in both stories because the differ significantly.
So are we to assume the second story was the lie because her memory was compromised?
You're doing a ton of tap dancing around the issue. Why not be a HERO and make yourself clear?
As you said; LIE or DIE. So which is it?
autoad 11 months ago
Geez, she just stopped James Earl Jones dead in his tracks with that flip remark about the good-looking motorcycle cop. It's nice that she can be all so cool after being so recently threatened with death. And you know what; she is nuts. She admits to having a policeman boyfriend (while she was married). Also, how come she and her cop friend didn't report this death threat to anybody. Check out this website for her drastically changing story ; mcadams poscmu edu/jhill htm
chasxyz1234 1 year ago
@chasxyz1234 Of COURSE, Arlen Spector knew better. She was THERE, you were NOT! Something just tells me inside, to believe someone like THAT, over you and the rest of the WC apologists.
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman YOUR CAPACITY FOR DELUDING YOURSELF IS ASTOUNDING! Did you focus exclusively on this one video or did you bother to do your homework and read the wildly varying accounts she has given over the years and the lies she has told? She went from She-ro to NERO; (SHE FIDDLED WITH THE STORY AND THE TRUTH GOT BURNED).
chasxyz1234 11 months ago
@chasxyz1234 I don NOT have to do any more HW to KNOW that JFK was killed as a result of a VAST CONSPIRACY, within HIGH levels of government. People in GENERAL, misspeak over time, because NO ONE'S memory is 100% perfect. CONNELLY said he was shot w/a DIFFERENT bullet, though the "Commission" said it was the same that hit JFK. Jean Hill was a DISSENTING WITNESS and I am PROUD to call her SHEROE!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman Yeah, well Connelly changed his mind too when he was shown evidence of what really happened to himself. Since he had his back to JFK and had been shot and was in a panic, he can be forgiven for his mistaken version of what happened. BOOKS and BRAINS are alike; they don't work when they're SHUT!
BaronVonSchtupp88 11 months ago
@Soulblackman It's nice that YOU know to 100% certainty that the evil gov't killed JFK. How about sharing with the rest of us poor fools the evidence that allows you to know this so assuredly (other than Jean Hill's idiotic blathering)?
BaronVonSchtupp88 11 months ago
People dont naturally lie, governments and their agents do !
But DV would know that !
klnine 1 year ago
free america died when jfk was ambushed.
irishgeal1 1 year ago 2
Just that opening statement is a lie. She was in fact not the closet person to Kennedy at the time of the shooting. James Earl Jones is just reading from a script so I don't blame him. But Jean Hill is so full of crap. She never has told the truth about what she saw or didn't see .
VIDEOTIMEMACHINE 1 year ago
@VIDEOTIMEMACHINE Very interesting that you told the truth and enough people voted you down because they didn't like what you said, never mind some of their insipid remarks!
chasxyz1234 1 year ago
@chasxyz1234 I don't care. The people that believe Jean Hill are nuts.
VIDEOTIMEMACHINE 1 year ago
@VIDEOTIMEMACHINE She was a HELL of a lot closer than YOU or I, making her UNIQUELY more qualified to speak to what she HEARD and SAW, than ANY of you apologists for the lying, snake-like, pre-scripted "investigation", AKA the WARRANTLESS COMMISSION.
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman If you look at the film of the shooting you can see she wasn't even looking at the President.
VIDEOTIMEMACHINE 11 months ago
@VIDEOTIMEMACHINE That ONE split second, YES, but the clip shown above, does NOT show everything! JFK had NOT been shot YET!. Jean turned her head afterwards, and saw EXACTLY what happened!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman You haven't done your homework. She was interviewed right after Kennedy was shot and said she was looking a Jackie Kennedy and said she was holding a dog. Fact is she wasn't . She was ans still is a very dishonest woman.
VIDEOTIMEMACHINE 11 months ago
Jean Hill never reported the death threats. Why? Because it never happened. She said she saw smoke from the Grassy Knoll but she wasn't even looking in that direction. She has zero credibility.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 1 year ago
@TELEVISIONARCHIVES Didn't report them because she was THREATENED then, by either the FBI, CIA, DPD, SS - WHOEVER! She is an American SHEROE!
Soulblackman 1 year ago
@Soulblackman Bull. She changed her story over and over.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 1 year ago
@TELEVISIONARCHIVES But the central story was INTACT, that she heard MORE THAN 3 shots! When one sees something of great trauma, it's very difficult to maintain a 100%, laser-sharp recollection of everything. Also, this interview was YEARS later, and it's conceivable she was suffering from slight senility. I BELIEVE HER. I do NOT believe there were just 3 shots. Interesting, ANYONE who has the COUNTER to the WC, is suddenly unreliable or delusional, and their recollection is expected to be 100%
Soulblackman 1 year ago
@Soulblackman This is the SAME crap they ran with the Newmans. THINK! Wouldn't you be the LEAST bit curious to interview the people who were CLOSEST to the president when he was shot? But NO, where going to depend SOLELY on people whom they CLAIM, just HAPPENED to see a rifle outside the TSBD.I was born yesterday, but NOT last NIGHT.
Soulblackman 1 year ago
@Soulblackman No it wasn't . She wasn't even look at JFK when he was shot. And she never said she saw a man by the grassy knoll for years. She's was full of it.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 1 year ago
@TELEVISIONARCHIVES I guess you were there? As I said, the WC was one of the biggest FRAUDS ever! They don't at LEAST interview Hill, Moorman or the NEWMAN'S? Of COURSE not; they didn't fit the SCRIPT!
Soulblackman 1 year ago
@Soulblackman Typical Conspiracy answer. I wasn't there but neither was Jean Hill if you go by what she said .
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 1 year ago
@TELEVISIONARCHIVES Well, I guess that Lady in Red was Natasha? Where was Boris Battenov??? She was THERE, saw it, HEARD it, KNEW it! THAT'S it!
Soulblackman 1 year ago
@Soulblackman If you read Vincent Bugliosi's book "Reclaiming History", especially the chapter she is discussed in, you will see that she has changed her story a number of times. She was not even called as a defense witness by Gerry Spence, who against Mr. Bugliosi, was the defense attorney for Lee Harvey Oswald in the mock trial conducted in 1986, which has been posted on YouTube and is available on DVD.
chasxyz1234 1 year ago
@chasxyz1234 It's conceivable that over time, one's recollection, especially after such a traumatic event, could alter, which is why it was IMPERATIVE that the WarrantLESS SUSPICION interview her ASAP! She couldn't possible have changed it so much back then. All of this is smoke & mirrors. The Suspicion should have interviewed her as a near WITNESS, then determined if her testimony was reliable. I guess the same for the NEWMANS? Gee, the ones CLOSEST to the murder were NOT called. Yet, I'm
Soulblackman 1 year ago
@Soulblackman supposed to rely on the "testimony" of Oswald's [turncoat] "brother", who wasn't even THERE! Jean Hill, her friend and the Newmans were THERE and up CLOSE! And I'm supposed to ignore that because the Warrantless Suspicion, as part of the HOAX, didn't do what they were SUPPOSED to do?
Soulblackman 1 year ago
@Soulblackman I don't have the book in f/o me, but her stories changed drastically ( I re-read her portion last night). Her recollection of the # of shots doesn't even jive with the majority of witnesses. Some people just look very rational and sound believable, but can still be self-deluding, liars or just "not all there". There are witnesses who believe the motorcade came to a standstill, when the Zapruder film shows no such thing happened.
chasxyz1234 1 year ago
@chasxyz1234 She was THERE. The witnesses were THERE! It's a matter of HUMAN REALITY that you'll get nuanced to what happened. Regardless, IF you're TRULY interested in the TRUTH, which is obvious the Suspicion was NOT interested in, you INTERVIEW the witnesses, those who were THERE. Anything else at BEST, speaks to laziness or incompetency and WORSE, a damn COVERUP!
Soulblackman 1 year ago
@Soulblackman Yes, we know she was there and there are plenty of photos to prove that, but that still makes her a kook when you read her various testimonies given at different times. And she did testify for the Warren Comm. She said so herself on the video.
chasxyz1234 1 year ago
@chasxyz1234 The Warrantless Suspicion had NO issue with any supposed kookiness. They simply had NO intention of finding the TRUTH. AGAIN, the Newmans who were ALSO THERE, weren't asked to testify. IF seeking the TRUTH, you leave no stone unturned, ESPECIALLY after the assassination of the PRESIDENT, and using TAXPAYER MONEY!
Soulblackman 1 year ago
Respond to this video...I CONSISTENTLY thank GOD for the LAST DISSENTING WITNESS! And DISSENT she did, despite the slander, being OVERLOOKED by the Warrantless Commission, and even in DEATH, the lies being spread by those so guilible, they probably believe in the EASTER BUNNY & the SANDMAN!
Soulblackman 1 year ago 2
@Soulblackman i agree
moparkid440 11 months ago
@moparkid440 Appreciate it. If there's a shooting on ur block, the detectives might just come to your house to determine if you saw OR heard something. And that's if you were in ur house when the thing went down. It is MINDBOGGLING to think that persons clearly in the film, right by the assassination, weren't asked what they SAW or HEARD! But I guess the "witnesses" that were nowhere near the crime scene were more credible. INCREDIBLE!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman That's odd. Jackie Kennedy, John Connolly, Nellie Connolly , Special Agents Greer ,Kellerman and Hill all testified to the Warren Commission and they were the closest people to the shooting.
You have no idea what you're talking about! All you're doing is repeating screwball Loonspirator nonsense like a parrot!
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad ALL, except Jean Hill, the Newmans and the others who were MURDERED (OOPS, I mean, died of "natural causes"), LIED! It was simple; lie or DIE!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman What are you talking about??!! Jackie wasn't killed. Nellie and John Connolly weren't killed. Agents Kellerman, Greer and Hill weren't killed. Jean Hill wasn't killed. The Newman's weren't killed.
Who had their life threatened? Who was killed?? Any evidence of this??
I suspect not. You're a loonspirator!!!
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad The OTHERS I was referring to, where the 50+ who "suddenly" died under MYSTERIOUS circumstances, even though it was determined to be statistically IMPOSSIBLE for them to die all so SOON, within such close proximity of each other. If you ask ME, I'll say that perhaps Kellerman, Greer and Hill SHOULD be killed for TREASON and abetting MURDER, if they were NOT threatened. Thank GOD for Jean Hill, an American, no, WORLD She-roe, who stuck to her guns, the TRUTH, no matter the cost.
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman But I have a question about Jean Hill and I thought you could verify something for me. Did she pass away in 2001?
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad She died in 2000, and from the little I read, seemingly under some STRANGE circumstances; right after she was interviewed by Len Osanic. They FINALLY caught up with her. RIP JEAN! Hell is freshly AWAITING the MURDERERS of JFK, and maybe even YOU!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman You are correct about the year she died. It was in 2000.
However, I'm not finding anything about her death being suspicious at all. It would seem logical for her family to have had an autopsy performed if they had reasons to believe she met her demise under suspicious circumstances.
She was interviewed within 40 minutes of the shooting by a newspaper and a TV reporter and she said "she saw nobody with a gun". Somebody must have gotten to her immediately after the shooting to put
autoad 11 months ago
@Soulblackman pressure on her not to talk about what she really saw. But 26 years later she emerges with a story about witnessing someone firing a gun at the president from the knoll and chasing a man she said was Jack Ruby. Let's see 1963 plus 26 years..that means she told this new story in 1989. She died in 2000. That makes 11 years from the new story until she died and you said "under some STRANGE circumstances".
Are we to believe that this big, evil, sinister, governmental machine who
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad I just found it interesting, that after being threatened with death, she DIES pretty soon after the book was published. Just CAN'T help but wondering.
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman Well you made another mistake. Last Dissenting Witness was published in 1992. Jean Hill died in 2000. "She dies pretty soon after the book was published"
That's 8 years she was prancing around selling and telling a lie.
And it took the government 8 years to track her down and eliminate her to keep her quiet?
I'm sure the government knew she was writing a book. Why didn't they bump her off before she could write it?
Once the book was published it seems silly to get rid of her.
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad U make a very GOOD point about the timing. Whether or not I made a MISTAKE, does NOT detract that Jean Hill was a WITNESS to the murder! Even IF she wasn't bumped off, NOTHING changes of her being a VALUABLE, CREDIBLE witness to the CONSPIRACY!
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman There's no doubt Jean Hill saw something. But I'm still deciding which story she told was the truth and which one was the lie. I suspect her first story;the one she told the television reporter and the one she told to the Warren Commission was close to what she really saw.
The second story, was the lie.
And how you're able to justify celebrating the lying Jean Hill is a complete and total mystery. You're inconsistent in your use of "logic" is clear and convincing.
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad Let's get right down to the chase - AGAIN. On Friday, November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, while on a motorcade route through downtown, was shot and killed, as a result of a CONSPIRACY. Whatever misspeaks, real or actual from Jean Hill, it does NOT change that simple FACT! She was there, I wasn't. You Warrantless Commission apologists crack me UP, with your tooth-fairy, Santa Claus, Sandman mentalities.
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman Frankly speaking, it's a fact that a conspiracy has not been proven in the assassination of JFK. You can insist all you want that he was killed by a conspiracy but that doesn't make it so.
What is factual are Jean Hill's comments that were recorded/filmed minutes after the assassination when she said she didn't see anyone with a gun. She told the same story ,under oath to be truthful, to the Warren Commission. It's a fact she changed her story 26 years later.
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad I don't care if she changed it 6 MINUTES later. At the blur of a moment, after seeing such trauma, the mind has a tendency to plays tricks on one's self. As I said before, she could have been displaying genuine signs of senility or just plain, memory loss. I BELIEVE her, and by virtue of the fact there [SURPRISINGLY] around, who STILL believe the Lone Nut THEORY, goes to show how GULLIBLE people can be. The conspiracy to assassinate JFK is BIGGER than ANY 1 person, INCLUDING Jean Hill.
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman Now you're an expert on Post Somatic Stress Syndrome? And you're speculating a diagnosis on someone you've never known. Actually, it sounds like you're making excuses for her lies. I suppose one can justify any behavior as long as it emanates from someone we hold in high regard. I also suspect you'd defend Jean Hill no regardless of what she said or did. Clearly, you've lost your ability to be objective and your obsession with her has clouded your thinking in spite of her lies.
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad On 11/22/63, JFK was assassinated by at LEAST 1 assassin. Witnesses, INCLUDING Jean Hill (Hell, I should call her JEAN of Arc!), said that there were MORE than 3 shots, rendering the Warren Commission a sham and a LIE, as they were the organ of the US government COVERUP to what really happened. Were it NOT for Jean Hill and other BRAVE SOULS, untold MILLIONS, much like YOU, would be deceived FOREVER, in the fairy-tale, Santa Claus, Tooth-fairy, Sandman, Easter Bunny "official version".
Soulblackman 11 months ago
@Soulblackman Most of the people in Dealey Plaza heard 3 shots. I can easily understand why some thought they heard more than 3 because of the echos. By your criticism of the Warren Commission are you suggesting the earwitnesses who heard 3 shots were part of the alleged cover-up?
You're free to heap on as much positive accolades to Jean Hill. But you'll never be able to justify or properly explain why she fabricated a story about what she saw. In my opinion, and it's only an opinion
autoad 11 months ago
@Soulblackman that she became jealous of her friend Mary Moorman because Mary had taken a photograph that became famous 19 years after it was taken. This is the photo that some people claim has the image of "Badgeman". Mary Moorman was now the center of attention and her good friend who was standing right next to her was rapidly becoming an obscure footnote in history. The "Badgeman" story was Jean Hill's ticket to credibility. Even though Jean Hill had told a television reporter and the Warren
autoad 11 months ago
@Soulblackman she did not see anyone with a gun that day, she invents a new story that puts her right in the middle of this historic event.
Jean Hill may have thought her name would last forever for what she said she saw. But she'll be remembered for what she didn't see and her obviously fabricated and fictitious story.
autoad 11 months ago
@Soulblackman You can engage in name-calling, making insults and diminishment. But it dosen't change a thing when it comes to facts.
Some people are bewildered why Jean Hill would tell the same story twice and then 26 years later change her story significantly. Then she writes a book about what she "saw", signs autographs in red ink and wears red outfits because she was "the women in red" in the Zapruder film. Meanwhile, she was making money from her changed story from book sales, appearences
autoad 11 months ago