Added: 1 year ago
From: world911truth
Views: 5,105
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (66)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nuclear demolition (period)

    Easy to prove, Jones' dust data backs it up.

  • @cheerdiver lol completely false

  • @152czar How do u explain the blast circles? loc(dot)gov/exhibits/911/image­s/lg-map-therm1(dot)jpg

    or the "earthquakes" that happened moments before collapse.

    Do steel beams just melt by themselves, thermal energy just come from no where.

  • @cheerdiver Jones tested for radiation. No signs of radiation. therefore no nuclear blast

  • @152czar lol completely false, Jones tested for TRITIUM. If u read his report to disprove, the use of fission and fusion are reversed. Not credible to those who know the difference.

    He also "claimed" not to know where the very high content of aluminasilicate came from. Zeolite was used at Chernobyl and Fukushima and it's ALUMINASILICATE!!

    Bedrock granite: 72% Si2O2 & 15% Al2O3 Do u have to guess what happens when fission temps are applied?

    LASER enrichment greatly reduces radiation of blast!

  • @cheerdiver No he used a geiger counter as well; a nuke would have produced fallout.

    laser enrichment is the same as others; the end product is the same the methods are different.

  • @152czar centrifuges produce a much less enriched product, and it cost alot more. I would propagate some sensitive info, but this is a public forum. The 1st devices were made w/ slide rules, yet somehow u deny any advancement w/ computers. Geiger counters "compare" background radiation. They have know how to reduce fallout dramatically, it was just too expensive even for the MIC. Besides, war is about perceived threat, ie fear.

  • @cheerdiver if it were less enriched, it wouldn't be able to create a nuke.

    Jones definitely tested for radiation, and there was none.

  • Comment removed

  • Hey "twoofers". When you say that building 7 was a controlled demolishion, then you are calling 100's of fire fighers on scene liars. Stand up and be proud of your fight for the "twoof". LOSERS!!!!

  • kim could not have seen damaage he claims to have during TV coverage on the day -no camera was or could have been near there - where the normally-reliable Ian Punnett got his surmise of facia damage on blg 7 I have no idea - david took back kims allegation just a few seconds later - they gave two tales of how 7 came down - maybe they should have chattdd before the show to get thsi straight

  • Wait there all talking about the possible demolition of building 7? But there is an interview with the owner of the WTC 7 admitting they had to PULL (industry term for explosive demolition) tower 7!

    The interview is on youtube!!!

  • These two 'Physicists' from New Mexico are complete idiots. I'm also confident they both received blow jobs from numerous individuals of the bush administration following this debate. It's hard to believe they have degrees in physics after listening to their arguments.

  • i dislike these debunkers mpre and more.... they are not scientific at all, and they trust the media more than evidence.

  • I find it hard to listen to coast now when Ian hosts. That is soooo sad for me because I have been listening for 20+years. Ian and these other debunking condesending d'bags are making my soul collapse(pun intended). I don't usually curse but gosh dang it! sorry bout the d'bag potty talk. Daaaaang! Ian.

  • You MIHOPs are just plain insane!

  • i am offended of how stupid they think we are, honesty, did they forget we have brains?

  • i honestly dont know what to belive. i think both sides have good points, but i dont like these arrogant "scientists"-even though i havent heard much science from them yet. im hearing more science from richard and neils..wow. if the original story is true, there should be a better arguement.

  • ian..asking a scientist who he thinks did this is unfair....he doesnt claim to know..he simply knows the official story is wrong..

    ian..your falling into the typical debunker trick trap....sad...

  • @impoid Exactly He has asked nearly a dozen times now DUH Who did it? DUH Who would have a motive?

  • why do i always get the impression that anyone who believes the official conspiracy theory is somehow more 'credible'..any anyone who doesnt is somehow crazy..

    everyone knows our governments lie and are corrupt..and that anything is possible...id think people who believe the official story are the more naive and gullible ones...

  • At the end of the day, the sons of Satan who orchestrated 911 are not the biggest criminals. We are. It is our stupidity, our cowardice, our laziness, our obedience which empower these vipers to carry out these horrific crimes against humanity. The vipers know that most people will not ask important and pertinent questions, they know that most sheeple will see what they are told, believe what they are told, no matter how incredulous and absurd.

    The masses are the biggest terrorists.

  • lol now Niels harrit has handed them there asses on a silver platter they say "so be it" when he pointed out they were in direct conflict of the NIST report this just gets better and better.

    Laurel and hardy also talk about how things are falling faster then free fall speed on the outside of the building as if this help coroborate there story?

    God there stupid, the fact that there were objects falling faster then free fall speed complicitly prooves there were forces at work propelling them !!

  • lol you have to laugh at ian punnett, when Niels Harrit stumped laurel and hardy with uniquivical truths and prior real life observations (no steal framed building in history has every collasped due to fire) they tried to come up with one that happened in spain and even got that wronge , Ian punnett then says "ahh I think were getting lost in the weeds here" and cut Niels harrit off

    ahahhaahhah you couldn't make this shit up, comedy gold dust I tell you !!

  • @JohnNiemsMusic

    "real research"

    Like publishing in self made journals or ones that implement no peer review? Yeah...9/11 truth is on top of that

    are you out of your tiny mind ? Dr Steven Jones amongst a thousand or so physicists and architects structural and chemical engineers including explosives and demolitions experts around the world have submitted a study for peer review

    you ignoramus

  • @yourmumstube78 I IGNORE AMUSES LIKE YOU BIG GUY!!!! Keep trying to intimidate me as it won't work! How much are they paying you?

  • @yourmumstube78

    Sigh...if you are talking about "Active Nanothermite", the publisher (Bentham) implements no peer review and spams for contributors. Your publisher is no better than a chain email.

    newscientist[dot]com/article/d­n17288-crap-paper-accepted-by-­journal[dot]html

    newscientist[dot]com/article/d­n17288-crap-paper-accepted-by-­journal[dot]html

  • @grandmastershek

    If you want to criticise the science in the paper, please feel free. A criticism of the publication is nothing more than "ad hom". If this paper was published in Goat Breeders Monthly, it wouldn't make any difference to the scientific merit of the paper itself. The only difference would be that the peer review is moved on a stage. To date, this paper is uncontested. If you want to claim the chips are paint or whatever, show they are paint or whatever.

  • @ThePeage

    LOL! It;s uncontested because it amounts to nothing some than some guy on the internet making a claim. Let us know when you guys can do what every other academic has to do. You don;t get to change the standards of academia because they aren't convenient.

  • @grandmastershek

    What ARE you talking about?

  • Why these buildings? Building 7 had important files for important cases that they wanted to go away! FBI - CIA - ENRON - SEC - all had offices in BUILDING 7 with important case files that needed to go away! THE COMMAND CENTER on floor 23 of RUDY also was in building 7 which had to be eliminated as well! THE OKC BOMBING had the same scenario with important case files that had to go away as well!

  • LMFAO at "Kim"..a Tower in Madrid fell down...

    Neils.."yes the Windsor tower" (only the very top 10 floor after being engulfed in an inferno for a number of hours..the rest of the building remained stable)

    Kim..NO!..it was another tower....I can't remember what it was...but...

    FUCKING MORON...IT IS THE WINDSOR TOWER THAT CHEAP SHILL WAS ABOUT TO BULLSHIT ABOUT.

  • Part 8 and all truthers posting are doing is regurgitating debunked woo and crying. Not shocked.

  • @rickzters

    I guess thats why they had the NIST report open for public comment.

  • Kim & Dave are an absolute joke, seriously, they must be liars, schills.

  • hollow pathetic inexcusable , Dave Thomas and Kim Johnson shameful weak and obvious lies .

  • wow those debunkers are filthy ignorant morons. You can actually hear the ignorance in their voice.

  • @Seigu007 I hear you on that.  Thomas and Kim have obviously had mental implosions. Their elevators shafts don't have flames going to the top, but sure a $hit it's blowing out their azz.

  • Thomas can not get his arms around the idea that ANY free fall impies uniform destruction of ALL supporting columns which is NOT POSSIBLE through asymetrical fires. Gage asks him, what about the permiter columns? Thomas says, they 'just weren't up to the task'...as though they made a conscious decision to quit working.

  • the warnings about wtc7 falling came from Giuliani's OEM - Giuliani knew that the towers were gonna come down - he told Peter Jennings - and that he knew that wtc7 was coming down - he's a lying rat , knight of malta with bush -

    NIST - other than initiating teh fires in wtc7 the damage from wtc1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of wtc7" ncstar1A xxxvii - they also say that diesel played no part - so popular mechanics big reasons were erased,by Nist

  • @mooners40 watch?v=GlCyDlFE5nU

    watch?v=KHxQ6yzU1qo watch this series about wtc7  , which fell at free-fall acceleration for 2.5 seconds

  • Dave and Kim are complete frauds. Listen to them carefully as they talk. Rough ideas and hearsay are good enough for them. They have no intellectual discipline and clearly they aren't scientists. Let's have them prove they have high school diplomas, then we can get to their claimed university degrees.

  • I'm not a violent person, but I'd sure like to slap the stupidity out of these lying "Physicists". It's one of the sickest lies I've ever seen perpetuated. Kim Johnson and Dave Thomas have sold any integrity which they might have previously had. I'm not sure they ever had it in the first place. You won't get away with this lie too much longer.

  • Oklahoma building lost a great portion of the exterior walls due to a fertilizer bomb and it was still standing until it was demolished by heavy equipment.

  • This Ian Punnett is unbelievably horrible person. To hear these two liars dancing together is like two third graders dealing with a master.

  • Dave and Kim you clowns will have to answer for what you are attempting to do here in front of a grand jury because it is a crime to attempt to cover-up the truth of mass murder you know? I suggest you get your lies in order a-holes because this recording will be used against you.

  • @centrino105

    Yeah! And Jesus is coming back too!

  • @centrino105 i agree with everything they say and the overwhelming majority agree as well. are we part of the coverup?

  • @centrino105 1 year since your post...waiting for that grand jury still? How about the last 7 years of Bush...and no one in congress brought charges against him or Cheney, etc...

  • @dsemencar

    So you are happy that murdering pigs and liars have gotten away with their crimes so far? Wow that says a lot about you doesn't it.

    Have patience, even Hitler escaped justice for a while until he had to kill himself that is. Mussolini got away with it for a while too until eventually he was hung from a lamp post by his own people.

    You just keep on cheering on these lying scum buddy and who knows maybe you will have to answer for it in front of a jury of your peers someday.

  • vvww dot AE911truth dot or g

    Wouldn't a proper independent investigation answer all these questions once and for all ?

    Why oppose such an investigation unless you are trying to cover something up ...

    sniff sniff something smells fishy

    Look at David Chandler and his ability to make NIST acknowledge that FREEFALL occurred in the collapse of WTC-7 when NIST was trying to use two data points to summarize the whole collapse .. SHODDY science by NIST to try and lengthen the actual collapse time.

  • Once again folks here we go with misleading information as it really should not be a debate as the building 7 came down because of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! RICHARD GAGE and NIELS HARRIT tell the truth and the other two are GATE KEEPERS or just plain idiots!

  • @JohnNiemsMusic

    You got it in CAPS, it must be troo!

  • @grandmastershek I listened to your explanation grand master and I think you are certainly full of yourself and indeed a gate keeper as well! Thanks for your insight or is it out sight! Willie has never wavered and you did a gate keeper job in trying to show he did! Nice try! No caps for you as all GATE KEEPERS and OFFICIAL STORY BELIEVERS don't like caps for some fucking reason! BUH BYE

  • @JohnNiemsMusic

    LOL! Wow ad hom & well poisoning. Nothing like the twoof!

  • @grandmastershek You are one funny SOB with that TWOOF! Do you have another GRAND MASTER GATE KEEPER SHEK? I mean it is getting old and all GATE KEEPERS really need to find a new vocation. I know how about doing some real research? HELL FUCKING O?????

  • @JohnNiemsMusic

    Is that the new alternative to calling some a shill? GATE KEEPER GATE KEEPER!!

    Someone needs to do a study on mental illness and the tendency to use CAPS.

    "real research"

    Like publishing in self made journals or ones that implement no peer review? Yeah...9/11 truth is on top of that.

  • @grandmastershek

    are you out of your mind ? Dr Steven Jones amongst a thousand or so physicists and architects structural and chemical engineers including explosives and demolitions experts around the world have submitted a study for peer review

    you ignoramus

  • @JohnNiemsMusic I doubt that the gate keepers are that stupid. For whatever reason, they accepted the role of defending lies. Was it money? Promise of career advancement? Ultimately, it doesn't matter why some people decide to become a whore.

  • Kim is just making shit up. Regarding Madrid: "The steel collapsed but the concrete stayed up." Harrit's use of the NIST report to discredit its feeble defenders is brilliant! So an oil rig collapse is the same as a steel frame high rise collapse?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • 6:45-7:02, 8:24-8:41: ZING!!

  • Comment removed

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more