Does anyone know what did Gordon Arnold die from in1997?....and there was a shooter from the grassy knoll area because JFK was shot in the side of his head...Oswald couldn't have shot him in the side of the Head from behind and also that whole investigation was fucked up...there is cover up all over the damn place....Keystone cops and a buch of Frauds...Hoover was a crook just like LBJ was
Reports from the medical personnel at Parkland Memorial Hospital-Dallas doesn't support Final Autopsy Report from Bethesda Hospital in D C. performed by Humes, Boswell, who were Hospital Administrators and never performed an autopsy in their medical careers. Dr. Pierre Fincke was an Army Dr. who DID have autopsy experience but was subservient to Humes & Boswell.The secondary medical personnel at both Hospitals gave info contrary to Humes & Boswell's Final Reports.
@trebelclef One question that this conspiracy nut has asked numerous times on youtube of the lone nut people is why did dozens of Parkland and Bethesda witnesses state that most of the right hemisphere of JFK's brain was missing. In the Warren Report is a copy of the official autopsy report in which a whole brain weight is given. This was one of the most important autopsies in American history, so this error is disturbing. I've witnessed autopsies, almost impossible to miss such a detail.
@7071t6 A: The route wasn't changed. The motorcade route appeared in print in the Dallas Morning News and the Dallas Time Herald on November 19th. It clearly states the motorcade would be traveling down Elm Street because that's the road that has the entrance ramp to the Stemmons Freeway. Jim Garrison promoted this lie in his book of fiction "On The Trail Of The Assassins". But you raise a good question about people standing on Elm Street.
My honest opinion. the plan to kill JFK was done, enyone that can be brought to justice, is dead, unless the laws in dallas, can bring family member's of the guilty to justice, then it's worth doing, but it will never happen, RIP JFK, RFK and all the other government Officals over the world, killed for nothing but wanting to change thier government standing's on various political issues.
@SUSSTURUCU How many shooters have the conspiracy obsessed put in Dealey Plaza? Badge Man Hard Hat Man Black Dog Man Coke Bottle Man Under the Grassy Knoll Man Picket Fence Man Waving at Maryann Moorman Man Cowboy Hat Man Sewer Sniper Man The Other Grassy Knoll Man Triple Underpass Man Dal-Tex Man The Building Behind the TSBD Man The Other Shooter In the TSBD Man Umbrella Man Pergola Man Hidden Shooter In The Trunk Of The Presidential Limo Man Jackie Kennedy Man Presidential Limo Driver Man
@LoneNutter1 if the JFK murder was a conspiracy, then the medical, physical, forensic and ballistic evidence would not be trustworthy, similar to the official 9/11 report being untruthful.
@trebelclef So you're saying the original autopsy was "fixed" by the pathologists and all the witnesses of the autopsy went along with it. Plus, the 9 pathologists for the HSCA would have to be complicit in the cover-up because they must have been pressured by the mysterious "them" who dreamed up this massive conspiracy.
It's a cute story with not one shred of evidence to support it.
By the way, does the government ever tell the truth about anything or is everything they say a lie?
Does the government ever tell the truth about anything? Since most goverment officials are owned by the Fed, big business, special interests, etc., I would have to say not likely. But your question was not a real question, it was designed as a strategy to make anyone disagreeing with you appear as black and white and narrow-mineded in their logic as you appear to be.
@trebelclef You seem convinced the government lied about the assassination yet it appears you left the door open a little bit that there are times they've been truthful. I'm curious how you're able to differentiate the truth from a lie. How do you do it?
Ed Hoffman is another "witness" who came forward years after the assassination. Ed was over 200 yards away from the back of the parking lot behind the grassy knoll. Ed must have amazing eyesight to be able to see with great clarity the two men he saw with the gun. Not only could Ed see great distances but he had the ability to see through solid objects. There was a billboard that would would have blocked his view. Ed didn't see anything. He's a "witness" inserting himself into history.
she was't there. She's also claimed to have been close friends with Jack Ruby. But when Ruby's friends were asked about Oliver, they had never heard of her nor did they ever recall Jack talk about her. Oliver is a leach. She's a parasite who'll do and say anything for notoriety, money, fame and name recognition.
Beverly Oliver is one of a few people who insert themselves into history by becoming a "witness" to something historically significant. Ed Hoffman, Gordon Arnold are two more examples of people who come forward years later to tell their story. But Bev claimed she had filmed the assassination with a movie camera that didn't make its way into the country until two years after the assassination.She doesn't appear in any photos where Mary Moorman, Jean Hill, Charles Brehm are standing. The fact is
@LoneNutter1 " I AM much smarter that you. You never see my posts filled with maniacal rantings or swearing, bullying and attempts to intimidate by name calling. That's all you pro conspiracy people can do."
@LoneNutter1 sorry mr.nutter but you trying to explain the trajectory of the tague bullet as a riccochet off the traffic signal over 200 ft away doesnt cut the mustard, nor you grabbing at straws with your even crazier explanation of a frag from the head shot traveling and arcing over the limo windshield and traveling along the pavement still 0ver 150 ft away and shattering concrete a logical explanation?????? Boooooooo!
@migo53333 Read the posting again. The key word is theory. And in typical conspiracy thinking, there's difficulty differentiating the words "theory"and "fact".
I don't need to explain what happened in Dallas. Those that accuse others of covering up the crime, manufacturing evidence, planting evidence etc. need to prove their accusations. So far, they've had nearly 50 years to do so and have failed miserably. Why don't you tell me what happened in Dallas? Then I'll ask you some questions.
@LoneNutter1 first of all, mr.nutter, no one has FAILED miserably, they just dont get the exposure deserved....."I don"t need to explain what happened in dallas" of ccourse you dont because you cannot! all you do is recite warren commission text......there is no skill in that.......its obvious you cannot explain the Tague situation......because that shot came from the daltex building directly behind Kennedy......crossfire, Mr. Conservative.........
@migo53333 There is, and has never been, a lack of exposure of the conspiracy theorists. Well over 2,000 books have been written about the topic with the vast majority of them being "conspiratorial" in topic and tome. So the shot that struck Teague came from the Dal-Tex building. I have some questions:
1.Where specifically was the shooter in the Dal-Tex building?
@usuIkane If a simple, single cell creature like yourself can hammer away at a keyboard and spew foolishness and profanities, there's a bright future ahead for us fruit flies. :)
@LoneNutter1 So you admit it!! You're a fruit fly!!! That is a kind of progress, I suppose.
I admire your honesty but I can't say I approve. While you're in " honesty mode ", can you tell us why you're such an idiot and deadbeat? Could you also answer these questions?
1.Where specifically was the shooter in the Dal-Tex building?
@LoneNutter1 " I have very good reasons for asking these questions.." LOL
How "good" can your reasons for asking these questions be if you have to ask these questions? LOL You idiot!! If you had done some research, you wouldn't have to ask the questions!! You clown!!!! Stop trying to browbeat @migo53333 with your insane bullshit!! Do some REAL research!! You self-confessed fruit fly!!!! LOL
@LoneNutter1 What was the caliber of the rifle he used?
Who was the manufacturer of the bullet?
I have very good reasons for asking these questions which will become apparent.
Why anyone would ask such ridiculous questions beats me .The information can be found readily in any good JFK assassination book such as Mark Lane's Rush to Judgment or Jim Marrs' Crossfire - to name but two. This LoneNutter1 is just a fool and a time waster.
@LoneNutter1 I'd rather be a fucking foul-mouthed teller of the truth than a fucking hypocrite and fucking son of a bitch liar like you.You fucking asshole!!
@LoneNutter1 You got a car!!!?? LOL Oh, I understand.
I read somewhere that car theft was a real problem where you come from.
I hope you fumigated the vehicle, left it back and paid the guy you "borrowed" it from. Better still I hope you go to jail for your anti-social and criminal behavior.
@FrankCIanton You of all people are critical of my "anti-social behavior"? That's funny Frank! There must be some new definition of that expression! LOL!
And "criminal"? What crime have I committed? Or are you re-defining that word too??
@LoneNutter1 Could you please tell the channel who FrankClanton is and why you have not sent the said FrankClanton a private message saying you have never stolen a car or bubblegum at Walmart??
@LoneNutter1 Ok mr. lonenutter, the daltex sniper was in the 2nd or 3rd floor window.....the police searched the building IMMEDIATELY!!!! and came out with a young man wearing a black leather and black gloves.....the crowd was trying to attack him....they put him in a car and drove away....the entire incident was never reported.......
@migo53333 Don't let this con man LoneCrapper1 kid you with his bullshit questions. He knows NOTHING about the JFK assassination!! He can't even tell the difference between Gordon Arnold and Arnold Rowland!!! LOL He's a complete asshole and troll!
@migo53333 @LoneNutter1 is an asshole. Treat him like an asshole! He thinks he's smarter than you. He's just a sad old cocksucker fuckhead. LOL Remember that when you reply to the fuckrag @LoneNutter1.
@cymrutroIl I AM much smarter that you. You never see my posts filled with maniacal rantings or swearing, bullying and attempts to intimidate by name calling. That's all you pro conspiracy people can do.
@cymrutroIl He is. The names don't help. His mind is as closed as a woman in a chastity belt. Ignorance is a sad state to be in. He tells idiotic lies such as that witnesses saw Oswald shoot Kennedy. Even the Warren Commission wasn't that stupid!
@LoneNutter1 Be reasoned, rational and mature and stop insulting other YouTube users and keep your sick sarcasm to yourself. Is that asking too much? Asshole!
@LoneNutter1 " Read the posting again. The key word is theory. And in typical conspiracy thinking, there's difficulty differentiating the words "theory"and "fact"."
Yes. That's true. You have ALWAYS had problems with theory/ practice.
Your wind speeds of 75 mph in Dealey Plaza on 22 November 1963 is a perfect example of your inability to distinguish between reality and what goes on in that sick little "brain" of yours. Don't worry! @migo53333 is here to put you straight! LOL
In reply to your question LoneNutter1,i'm still studying a lot of other peoples research,sorting the wheat from the chaff. Many different groups wanted JFK gone and all were spurious. With LHO i think its almost certain he was CIA or FBI or both,he was obviously involved in some way but not sure he was the killer,he certainly had some dubious contacts. Whoever was involved J Egar Hoover and LBJ must have had knowledge to effect such an effective cover up.Warren Comission equals cover up.
A book suppository is needed for those who believe the official story. A book that could fit this bill is "Oswald and the CIA" by John Newman. It could be microfilmed, then placed inside a small dissolvable suppository and shoved up the asses of the idiots that believe a lone gunman executed this without any help from anyone. By mental telepathy, he was able to change the route, and force the Secret Service to drop their coverage of the topless limo!
There is just too much alteration of witness testimony and evidence lost or confiscated to give any other conclusion than a cover up or conspiracy.The verdict was out almost immediately after the shooting, ignoring witness testimony regarding the grassy knoll,these questions have never been answered so its obvious people will still be looking for answers.
@LoneNutter1 dude because only ONE can be correct......get over it!!! we live in a corrupt world......you cannot handle the truth.....your bugging out in denial......this world was built on conspiracies....why do we praise Columbus....since you were a child you were told that he was a wonderful man who discovered the new world.......what they failed to leave out is the FACT that he slaughtered many of the native carribeans, mostly of hispaniol and set up a slave trade back to europe.....!
@migo53333 You've not provided anything of merit to be considered with any seriousness whatsoever. Flashes of light- men by a fence- a man running and Columbus killing the natives.
There's the Kennedy assassination all wrapped up and the conspiracy uncovered.
@LoneNutter1 my friend, it doesnt matter what anyone says to you........you r very narrow minded.....its kind of sad......if you had any logic at putting 2+2 together the columbus analogy proves that we have been deceived before....we" ve been lied to on a grand scale....its been typed into our textbooks they even have knights of columbus affiliated with the catholic church..........you dont get it.......take care
@migo53333 I do "get it". Following your reasoning you can say anything that happened in history is a result of a conspiracy and a planned deception. And that is pure bunk. You don't make any sense whatsoever.
@LoneNutter1 sorry mr. lone nutter but i had to return to bring up one more question........how did that bullet hit the curb 200 feet down towards the overpass causing the concrete to shatter and hit james tague in the face....maybe u can explain the trajectory......
@migo53333 No I can't. Nor will I try for the following reasons;
1. There's doubt as to what struck the concrete. Was it the bullet or a bullet fragment?
2. There's doubt as to which fragment struck Tague. Was it from the missed shot or the third shot when the bullet fragmented?
3. There's a new theory that the first shot LHO fired struck the traffic light at the intersection of Houston and Elm. A fragment of the bullet could have struck Tague.
@migo53333 significance to something that cannot be explained. They have a history of demanding that everything be proven. And if something can't be proven (to their satisfaction) they immediately assume it's proof a conspiracy took place. They love to argue "lack of evidence IS evidence". That kind of logic is childish and tragically flawed. In a court of law any lawyer using that argument would be ridiculed and laughed out of the building.
how did gary mack go from being an enthusiastic conspiracy buff to curator of the 6th floor museum, and lone gunman lee oswald did it alone theorist...
@LoneNutter1 no..... i think he saw the lucrative opportunity......place will never go out of business......sorry, but this was a conspiracy......start with the mark lane interviews.....more and more the finger points in the direction of Johnson.......i think i will stick to Hunts statements....the man was a player, to say the least.....he was dying....had nothing more to gain or lose my friend....you nonchalantly wave off an ocean of circumstance.....obviously oswald was a player.....
@migo53333 The lucrative opportunity lies with the conspiracy theorists who written books, make videos and major motion pictures. Mark Lane was the first of the opportunists and decades later we have over 1,000 books written about the assassination with the overwhelming majority being conspiratorially themed. But there'a a major problem with these "conspiracy books" They have different plotters with different motives using different gunmen using different rifles with different ammo firing
@LoneNutter1 change how you r looking at this........only one theory is correct......a crossfire.....all the noise is a distraction..it doesnt matter how many theories exist.......conspiracies have existed through out history.....this is no different.......your mind does not allow more than one shooter to exist, no matter what any evidence says....
When there is no physical, ballistic, medical or forensic evidence of a crossfire why should I believe it occurred in Dallas?
When there is no physical, ballistic, medical or forensic evidence of a second gunman or a shot from the knoll or fence, or the triple underpass, or the Dal-Tex building, or the sewer, or from another window in the TSBD why should I believe it occurred? My mind keys on on facts and evidence and not speculation, supposition, innuendo or rumor.
@LoneNutter1 Uummmm....maybe you can start with the parkland doctors who were the first to see the wounds....they called the neck an entrance wound......and also head shot to right temple area blowing off the back portion of the head.....i can fire a rifle from any location and not leave behind any evidence that i was there in that location.....the guy in the tower behind the grassy knoll lee bowers, witnessed 2 men behind fence and then a flash from their location.....3 shots bang.....bang,bang
@migo53333 Eyewitness testimony is highly unreliable. That's why the medical, physical, ballistic and forensic evidence is relied upon whenever there's a murder. We know the Dr. at Parkland were wrong about the neck wound. The physical evidence (JFK's shirt) showed the fibers around his collar and neck tie were all moving away from the victim. This clearly shows the bullet exited his throat. They were wrong about the head wound. How could they have seen the back of his head when they never
@migo53333 turned him over. So how could they see the back of his head when his head was resting in a cradle and they never turned him over? It's completely unreasonable for there to have been multiple gunman in the plaza due to its small size. Someone firing from the knoll would have been seen. In fact, of all the hundreds of people who were in Dealey Plaza not one person ( Including Jean Hill) saw anyone shooting from the knoll or any other location except for the 6th floor of the TSBD.
@LoneNutter1 listen to e howard hunts deathbed confession......u probably dont even know who hunt was or how significant a player he was.........you sound like a warren commission believer........again check out interview titled jfk shooter seen running from picket fence.......and then checkout the railroad workers who were on the triple underpass.....
@migo53333 The Hunt "confession" is subject to interpretation. You can read into it whatever you want. It would be nice if Hunt were still alive so his claims could be corroborated. There are other legitimate considerations; was Hunt of sound mind? Unknown.Was Hunt making this "confession" freely or was it made under duress? Unknown. It it really the voice of Hunt? Unknown.
Regarding the shooter running from the picket fence; Who said they saw a shooter running from the fence? Ed Hoffman?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@migo53333 Ed Hoffman was over 200 yards away from the back of the grassy knoll and would have to have supreme vision to see what he claims he saw. Plus, he'd have to have X-ray vision because a billboard stood between him and the back of the knoll. Are you relying on Lee Bowers as a witness? Lee never saw anyone with a rifle on the knoll and he never saw anyone shooting at JFK. In fact, nobody saw anyone shooting at JFK from the knoll. But multiple witnesses saw a gunman in the 6th floor
@migo53333 of the TSBD shooting at the president. The railroad workers didn't see anyone shooting at the president nor did they see anyone running away from the fence. Neither did the police officer who was on the bridge with the railroad workers. The most they saw was a "puff of smoke". That's interesting. Rifles emit trace amounts of smoke and it was windy in Dealey Plaza that day. How could they have seen smoke from a rifle on a windy day? Are you aware of what the 9 forensic pathologists
@migo53333 for the HSCA said it their report to the commission? No evidence of the president being shot from the front or side. So why are we looking for a gunman where none was seen and no medical, physical, forensic or ballistic evidence says one was there? It's 100% CT'er foolishness that searches for something that was never there.
@migo53333 you can check out parkland doctor interviews present day and they still say entrance wound in throat......also check out interviews with the railroad workers on the triple underpass.....shots last shot came from grassy knoll........check out interview Jfk shooter seen running from fence.....was that guy hallucinating.....how about many people saying sound of shots was bang........bang.bang
@migo53333 Im going to believe the doctors......first shot entered kennedy in upper back ...this is the shot that made him cringe up and bring his hands up.....if you research it you would know that this bullet only entered the body about 2 inches deep and stopped....this was the pristine bullet found on the stretcher........you still havnt explained Bang...............Bang Bang!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@migo53333 Why don't you check out the report from the 9 forensic pathologists from the HSCA? All of them said there is no evidence of the president being shot from the front or side. All of them said JFK was struck twice by shots fired from above and behind. The medical, ballistic, and physical evidence supports this as well. Plus, there were no witnesses who saw someone on the knoll firing at JFK. There were multiple witness who saw a rifle firing from the 6th floor of the TSBD. Check it out.
@migo53333 from different locations firing a different number of shots and all the gunman escape Dealey Plaza by different means. The problem is...all of these theories can't be correct. At best, only one might be correct. In your opinion Johnson seems to be the culprit/mastermind behind the killing. What do you say to those who say Cuban exiles did it or the Illuminati, or the Vatican? What makes the theory you believe the correct one and all the others incorrect?
@LoneNutter1 ummm lee bowers saw men behind the fence and then a flash or something he couldnt explain......ummm there was a building engineer on the building opposite side of dealey plaza...lane interviewed him on the roof of the building and he explained and pointed too the parking lot behind the knoll and how he saw a man running after the shots to behind the tsbd....hmmmmmmm....
@migo53333 Two men by a fence and a flash of light. Well the ONLY thing that could have happened is they must have fired a rifle at the president. There's no other possible explanation for two men and a flash of light. Now we have the rooftop engineer interviewed by that bastion of truth Mark Lane. He says (from over 200 yards away) he saw one man running after he shots. More concrete conclusive evidence of someone shooting a rifle from the knoll. Someone saw a man running. Wow! That's amazing!
Gordon Arnold is the worst actor I've ever seen. Anyone with a trace of humanity and common sense, can see he's acting. The big movements of the head, the staged incoherency, the shifting of his body language. J'accuse! Gordon Arnold is a liar and a fraud.
THE HEAD SHOT CAME FROM THE STORM DRAIN WHERE A GUNMAN WAS WAITING ALSO ALONG WITH BADGE MAN THEY BOTH SHOT JFK, MAY THEY NEVER HAVE PEACE FOR WHAT THEY DID, ALL OF THEM.
This Moorman photo was also enhanced professionally by R.I.T. with a special machine with a red laser that recorded every piece of the photo. After a point they stopped enhancing, apparently afraid of the controversy ,but showed better resolution than Jack White's photo, I think before. It was a clear that there was a man with a cop uniform and a muzzle blast in front of his face. If Gordon is lying, how could he have predicted everything in a photo that wasn't enhanced yet? Psychic?
Gordon Arnold should met the man I have known: if not wearing his army uniform: he would not havegotten out of Texas and sent to alaska. Few people can say they saw the grassy knoll gun man: but I saw and worked with him for two years: and after giving his identity tried to shot me down: I am bullet proof: and that killer knows it: Christ Peter; the son of God. Can the people find me as President before 140 million voters are killed by Federal Gun Bank hired murderers? And what is my name?
Dorothy Kilgallen, a crime reporter of the New York Journal, obtained a private interview with Jack Ruby. She told friends that she had information that would "break the case wide open". Aware of what had happened to Bill Hunter and Jim Koethe, she handed her interview notes to her friend Margaret Smith. On 8th November, 1965, Kilgallen, was found dead. It was reported she had committed suicide. Her friend, Margaret Smith, died two days later.
@ed11561 Kilgallen was a gossip columnist, not a crime reporter. Her death was ruled an accidental combination of alcohol and barbituates, not suicide.
@furryisthenewedgy So was MM. On 8th November, 1965, Kilgallen, was found dead. It was reported she had committed suicide. Her friend, Margaret Smith, died two days later.
"Badgeman" is made of light, shadow and an creative imagination.He'd have to be 30" tall or standing on a step ladder firing a rifle 16-20 feet in the air in the middle of the parking lot behind the knoll. To believe Arnold you have to believe "Badgeman" is real, fired a rifle at JFK, climbed over the fence, accosted Arnold, spoke to Arnold, stoke Arnold's camera, left the area on foot and was not seen by anyone else in Dealey Plaza.
Gordon Arnold was full of shit. You mean to tell me that seconds after the President is killed, a man with a gun comes out from behind the fence, beats up on Arnold, who is on the ground in front of the fence, takes Arnold's camera, and no one else in Dealey Plaza saw what would have been in plain sight? Bullshit!
@BavisTrickle - I agree that Gordon Arnold was full of shit. There were cameras that rolled and showed people up on the grassy knoll shortly after and the badgeman would not have had time to accost him. Complete nonsense.
@BavisTrickle Yeah. Sad thing is the fact that there are several people filming the knoll area within seconds of the shooting, and not one of them show Arnold in that area. If what he says took place actually did take place, then the groundskeeper, Emmett Hudson, would have seen it all, as he lay on the steps that lead to the pergola on the knoll for over a minute.
@BavisTrickle It would be in plain sight. It was between a fence and a wall. And as you can see in part 2 Senator Yarborough heard a shot and saw a man dive and said he thought to himself it was an infantryman. The wall was in front of the fence and there were spaces in the fence to get to Arnold. If he wasn't there he couldn't have predicted what was in the photo anyway.
I think the "badgeman" is Gordon Arnold. I can't see two other figures there and I've zoomed in to the pixel level of a scan of the Mooreman Polaroid. I also believe the picture was taken before the final headshot, not after. You can line up the position of Mooreman in the Zap. film and see when she would've taken the picture. In other words there would be no muzzle flash or smoke visible in Mooreman polaroid. If you open the Mooreman photo in photoshop you can see that it's Arnold, not a cop.
On the grassy knoll, there were two of jack ruby's "gang" members. One shot and missed. Then Lee Harvey Oswald, who was hired by Jack Ruby, shot JFK in the spine. That caused JFK's arms to go up. After that shot, the other man on the grassy knoll shot and killed the president. All of which the government covered up by destoying all evidence.
I can see that some people here, have not read the Warren Commission testimony from Bowers, the railroad watchman. It would also have helped if the Feds did not destroy all the photographic evidence from Dealey that day. The stark reality is that it doesn't matter who shot him from which part of Dealey, it is more important to know why? Then who? Than how! Here's a clue - he was killed in Texas, now go figure!
@rnbsnemtpClaims of the government destroying any film or photos is totally absurd. You have no proof they did and the logistics required to pull off the faking or destruction of film/photos would have been impossible.
You conspiracy loons make yourselves irrelevant when you engage in making irresponsible and false accusations. It's safe to say that you people have done more to destroy the credibility of any future investigations due to your foolish, wacky and unsubstantiated charges.
@autoad Saying that the gov't doing those things, "is absurd", is itself closeminded. Gov'ts throughout history and around the world have often done those types of things. Why would you think that just because it's the American gov't, that it's absurd? Probably because, like a lot of Americans you have the naive belief that we're "above" that sort of thing or that we're incapable of it just by virtue of being American. Therein lies your blindspot. Being a blind spot... you wont see it.
@mrfester42 My objection to the claims of the government destroying or altering photographs/film in Dealey Plaza has nothing to do with being "American". It has to do with logistics.
It's not possible for the government to destroy or alter all of the photos and all of the film used that day. They would have to know the name of every person who used a camera. We're aware of those who took film that day from the photos we've seen. But we know there were lots of other people taking pictures we
@mrfester42 haven't seen because we see these people taking photos in the Zapruder/Nix/Muchmore/Hughes/Bronson films. We know the photos exist and their likely stored away in a closet. A few years ago photos were brought to the 6th Floor Museum by Jay Skaggs who thought his photos were of little value. (Gee..I guess the government missed those pictures) He had the photos stored away because he said they didn't show anything about the actual shooting and thought they were of no value.
@mrfester42 In addition, if the government was going to alter photos, they'd have to alter all the photos so they'd be in agreement with each other. If they missed one photo it would reveal the plot to "fudge" the pictures. Logistically, that's impossible!
Plus, there is ZERO evidence the government confiscated /altered/destroyed photos from Dealey Plaza.The accusation is ridiculous and without merit.
If the Warren commission didn't ignore Mr. Arnold and all the other credible witnesses WHO WERE ACTUALLY THERE, then theworld would know the truth. But instead they decided to fuck around and pin the blame on a patsy, known to be a poor shot at best. LHO is innocent.
Or delusional. But you're correct. This is an absolute crock. There were people behind the fence and in front of it. You'd be spotted with a rifle right away. But as long as there's a few bucks to be made, these lame witnesses will keep discovering things they forgot on the day but suddenly remembered almost fifty years later.
Let me explain something to you idiots, I've been to the grassy knoll, I've stood behind the Fence, the Grassy Knoll was the absolute worst place to shoot a gun that day, you would have been seen by every single person within 100 feet, the moment the gun fired you would have been seen, there is no get away from behind the fence, you are at ground level, no where to go. Period. For anyone to believe that a gun was fired there that day do yourselves a favor, get help, you are dilutional.
@northbeachson I've got news pal, ive been there too. It's very easy to shoot from there. Any tree growth (obstruction) wouldn't have been a problem 47 years ago. Also, the "badgeman figure" was disguised as a cop. So obviously, no one would bother a cop. And he wasn't caught because all the real cops were dicking around in the School book depository. And if you look at the zapruder film, kennedy is thrown back ward and to the left, indicating a shot from the right front.
@raran44 Sounds like you're reaching for straws, Kennedy is thrown forward first then back, watch the Zapruder film in slow motion, he's already tilted to his left after the throat shot.
@raran44 You're missing the point, I didn't say it wasn't easy to shoot from there, ANY shot from there would have been heard and seen by every person within a hundred feet, every person, not a few. Shooters dressed as cops, you're a riot.
Does anyone know what did Gordon Arnold die from in1997?....and there was a shooter from the grassy knoll area because JFK was shot in the side of his head...Oswald couldn't have shot him in the side of the Head from behind and also that whole investigation was fucked up...there is cover up all over the damn place....Keystone cops and a buch of Frauds...Hoover was a crook just like LBJ was
cwc27 1 hour ago
Reports from the medical personnel at Parkland Memorial Hospital-Dallas doesn't support Final Autopsy Report from Bethesda Hospital in D C. performed by Humes, Boswell, who were Hospital Administrators and never performed an autopsy in their medical careers. Dr. Pierre Fincke was an Army Dr. who DID have autopsy experience but was subservient to Humes & Boswell.The secondary medical personnel at both Hospitals gave info contrary to Humes & Boswell's Final Reports.
trebelclef 1 week ago
@trebelclef One question that this conspiracy nut has asked numerous times on youtube of the lone nut people is why did dozens of Parkland and Bethesda witnesses state that most of the right hemisphere of JFK's brain was missing. In the Warren Report is a copy of the official autopsy report in which a whole brain weight is given. This was one of the most important autopsies in American history, so this error is disturbing. I've witnessed autopsies, almost impossible to miss such a detail.
sauroid1 1 week ago
Q, How did all the people know that JFK was gfoing to go down elm street, when it was changed at the last miunte, also it was running 10 min late.?
7071t6 1 week ago
@7071t6 A: The route wasn't changed. The motorcade route appeared in print in the Dallas Morning News and the Dallas Time Herald on November 19th. It clearly states the motorcade would be traveling down Elm Street because that's the road that has the entrance ramp to the Stemmons Freeway. Jim Garrison promoted this lie in his book of fiction "On The Trail Of The Assassins". But you raise a good question about people standing on Elm Street.
LoneNutter1 1 week ago
My honest opinion. the plan to kill JFK was done, enyone that can be brought to justice, is dead, unless the laws in dallas, can bring family member's of the guilty to justice, then it's worth doing, but it will never happen, RIP JFK, RFK and all the other government Officals over the world, killed for nothing but wanting to change thier government standing's on various political issues.
7071t6 1 week ago
The Nix film or other footage does not show a man with a uniform on, jumping to the ground
7071t6 1 week ago
WaS BADGE MAN JACK RUBY ???
HE LOOK LİKES TO JACK RUBY..
??
SUSSTURUCU 3 weeks ago
LoneNutter1 1 week ago
@LoneNutter1 OKAY...
What do you think ??
Who did shoot to JFK ??
Oswald ?? or David Ferrie ??
SUSSTURUCU 1 week ago
@SUSSTURUCU Without a doubt Oswald.
There is no medical, physical, forensic or ballistic evidence JFK was shot from the front or side.
There is plenty of medical, physical, forensic and ballistic evidence JFK was shot from behind and above and he was struck twice.
There is plenty of medical, physical, forensic and ballistic evidence that shows the shots came from the 6th floor of the TSBD and were fired by LHO.
There's zero evidence Ferrie was in Dealey Plaza that day.
LoneNutter1 1 week ago
@LoneNutter1 if the JFK murder was a conspiracy, then the medical, physical, forensic and ballistic evidence would not be trustworthy, similar to the official 9/11 report being untruthful.
trebelclef 1 week ago
@trebelclef So you're saying the original autopsy was "fixed" by the pathologists and all the witnesses of the autopsy went along with it. Plus, the 9 pathologists for the HSCA would have to be complicit in the cover-up because they must have been pressured by the mysterious "them" who dreamed up this massive conspiracy.
It's a cute story with not one shred of evidence to support it.
By the way, does the government ever tell the truth about anything or is everything they say a lie?
LoneNutter1 1 week ago
Does the government ever tell the truth about anything? Since most goverment officials are owned by the Fed, big business, special interests, etc., I would have to say not likely. But your question was not a real question, it was designed as a strategy to make anyone disagreeing with you appear as black and white and narrow-mineded in their logic as you appear to be.
trebelclef 1 week ago
@trebelclef You seem convinced the government lied about the assassination yet it appears you left the door open a little bit that there are times they've been truthful. I'm curious how you're able to differentiate the truth from a lie. How do you do it?
LoneNutter1 6 days ago
@trebelclef As to you claim about my motives and trying to make people who disagree with me look narrow minded...that's something I don't need to do.
LoneNutter1 6 days ago
another witness to the fake SS agent with dirty hands
nicenonya3 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ed Hoffman is another "witness" who came forward years after the assassination. Ed was over 200 yards away from the back of the parking lot behind the grassy knoll. Ed must have amazing eyesight to be able to see with great clarity the two men he saw with the gun. Not only could Ed see great distances but he had the ability to see through solid objects. There was a billboard that would would have blocked his view. Ed didn't see anything. He's a "witness" inserting himself into history.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
Comment removed
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
she was't there. She's also claimed to have been close friends with Jack Ruby. But when Ruby's friends were asked about Oliver, they had never heard of her nor did they ever recall Jack talk about her. Oliver is a leach. She's a parasite who'll do and say anything for notoriety, money, fame and name recognition.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Beverly Oliver is one of a few people who insert themselves into history by becoming a "witness" to something historically significant. Ed Hoffman, Gordon Arnold are two more examples of people who come forward years later to tell their story. But Bev claimed she had filmed the assassination with a movie camera that didn't make its way into the country until two years after the assassination.She doesn't appear in any photos where Mary Moorman, Jean Hill, Charles Brehm are standing. The fact is
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoneNutter1 " Beverly Oliver is one of a few people who insert themselves into history
" I wonder where you'd like to insert yourself, boy? Care to share it with
the channel? Beverley is one hell of a good-lookin' woman!! Maybe you just don't
like women, boy? LOL
@LoneNutter1" there's a bright future ahead for us fruit flies. :)"
LMFAO
Fruit fly!!!!!!! LOL
usuIkane 1 month ago 2
@LoneNutter1 " I AM much smarter that you. You never see my posts filled with maniacal rantings or swearing, bullying and attempts to intimidate by name calling. That's all you pro conspiracy people can do."
You're a fucking asshole!!! Fruit fly!!!
cymrutroIl 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoneNutter1 @LoneNutter1" there's a bright future ahead for us fruit flies. :)" LMFAO
Fruit fly!!!!!!! LOL
LittIeVinnyCock 1 month ago 8
JFK - The Death of Eyewitness Lee Bowers
FUCK OFF LONE-IDIOT!!!
nicenonya3 2 months ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@nicenonya3 It doesn't matter how much education one has. Facts, evidence and common sense don't need a diploma to be true.
You're exhibiting typical CT'er behavior. When you can't articulate an opinion, you insult and attempt to diminish people who don't agree with you.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@LoneNutter1 sorry mr.nutter but you trying to explain the trajectory of the tague bullet as a riccochet off the traffic signal over 200 ft away doesnt cut the mustard, nor you grabbing at straws with your even crazier explanation of a frag from the head shot traveling and arcing over the limo windshield and traveling along the pavement still 0ver 150 ft away and shattering concrete a logical explanation?????? Boooooooo!
migo53333 1 month ago
@migo53333 Read the posting again. The key word is theory. And in typical conspiracy thinking, there's difficulty differentiating the words "theory"and "fact".
I don't need to explain what happened in Dallas. Those that accuse others of covering up the crime, manufacturing evidence, planting evidence etc. need to prove their accusations. So far, they've had nearly 50 years to do so and have failed miserably. Why don't you tell me what happened in Dallas? Then I'll ask you some questions.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 first of all, mr.nutter, no one has FAILED miserably, they just dont get the exposure deserved....."I don"t need to explain what happened in dallas" of ccourse you dont because you cannot! all you do is recite warren commission text......there is no skill in that.......its obvious you cannot explain the Tague situation......because that shot came from the daltex building directly behind Kennedy......crossfire, Mr. Conservative.........
migo53333 1 month ago
@migo53333 There is, and has never been, a lack of exposure of the conspiracy theorists. Well over 2,000 books have been written about the topic with the vast majority of them being "conspiratorial" in topic and tome. So the shot that struck Teague came from the Dal-Tex building. I have some questions:
1.Where specifically was the shooter in the Dal-Tex building?
2.What specific make/model weapon was fired.
3.What was the caliber of the round?
4.Who manufactured the bullet?
I await your reply.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 LOL Still posting your insane crap!!!!!
cymrutroIl 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoneNutter1 Please give the correct number of books written. LOL
1.Where specifically was the shooter in the Dal-Tex building?
2.What specific make/model weapon was fired.
3.What was the caliber of the round?
4.Who manufactured the bullet?
LOL
Answer your own questions!! We are not here to help you with your non-existent research!!
We look forward to receiving your answers soon.
cymrutroIl 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1aka @LoneCrapper1
Answer these questions!!
1/ What color socks was Governor Connally wearing on Nov 22 1963?
2/ How many yellow roses were in the bouquet given to Mrs Connally on Nov 22 1963?
3/ How many buttons were on Chief Jesse Curry's jacket on Nov 22 1963?
4/ What was the engine number of the limousine JFK was in on Nov 22 1963?
And here's an easy one -
5/ What was the wind speed in Dealey Plaza on November 22 1963?
LOL
We await your reply.
cymrutroIl 1 month ago
@cymrutroIl
1. Black
2.12 (Nellie Connally got yellow roses-Jackie got red roses at Love Field)
3. 4
4. Don't have the number committed to memory but I'll find out and get back to you.
5. 10 to 15 mph
Anything else?
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 4. " Don't have the number committed to memory but I'll find out and get back to you."
I didn't know fruit flies had memories. You learn something new every day!! LOL
usuIkane 1 month ago
@usuIkane If a simple, single cell creature like yourself can hammer away at a keyboard and spew foolishness and profanities, there's a bright future ahead for us fruit flies. :)
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 So you admit it!! You're a fruit fly!!! That is a kind of progress, I suppose.
I admire your honesty but I can't say I approve. While you're in " honesty mode ", can you tell us why you're such an idiot and deadbeat? Could you also answer these questions?
1.Where specifically was the shooter in the Dal-Tex building?
2.What specific make/model weapon was fired.
3.What was the caliber of the round?
4.Who manufactured the bullet?
Asinine questions. Just perfect for you!
DonaId6899 1 month ago 6
@DonaId6899 Dont know the make or the model...... or manufacturer
migo53333 1 month ago 12
@migo53333
What was the caliber of the rifle he used?
Who was the manufacturer of the bullet?
I have very good reasons for asking these questions which will become apparent.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoneNutter1 " I have very good reasons for asking these questions.." LOL
How "good" can your reasons for asking these questions be if you have to ask these questions? LOL You idiot!! If you had done some research, you wouldn't have to ask the questions!! You clown!!!! Stop trying to browbeat @migo53333 with your insane bullshit!! Do some REAL research!! You self-confessed fruit fly!!!! LOL
PeterFirthFanny 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoneNutter1 @LoneNutter1 " there's a bright future ahead for us fruit flies. :)" LMFAO
Fruit fly!!!!!!! LOL
cymrutroIl 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoneNutter1 What was the caliber of the rifle he used?
Who was the manufacturer of the bullet?
I have very good reasons for asking these questions which will become apparent.
Why anyone would ask such ridiculous questions beats me .The information can be found readily in any good JFK assassination book such as Mark Lane's Rush to Judgment or Jim Marrs' Crossfire - to name but two. This LoneNutter1 is just a fool and a time waster.
MrTroIIol 1 month ago 13
@LoneNutter1 You'll burn in hell for your lies and deception. Have you no shame?
Is it possible for a fruit fly to feel ashamed? You'll be burned to a crisp in fruit fly hell.
Do fruit flies believe in God? Either way you'll roast for your sins.
FrankCIanton 1 month ago 4
@LoneNutter1 I'd rather be a fucking foul-mouthed teller of the truth than a fucking hypocrite and fucking son of a bitch liar like you.You fucking asshole!!
cymrutroIl 1 month ago
@cymrutroIl You excel at swearing and being foul mouthed and fail miserable at telling the truth.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 I don't understand how you can go to your Church on a Sunday.
FrankCIanton 1 month ago
@FrankCIanton Oh, that's easy Frank! I get in my car and drive.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 You got a car!!!?? LOL Oh, I understand.
I read somewhere that car theft was a real problem where you come from.
I hope you fumigated the vehicle, left it back and paid the guy you "borrowed" it from. Better still I hope you go to jail for your anti-social and criminal behavior.
FrankCIanton 1 month ago
@FrankCIanton You of all people are critical of my "anti-social behavior"? That's funny Frank! There must be some new definition of that expression! LOL!
And "criminal"? What crime have I committed? Or are you re-defining that word too??
You're a funny fellow Frank!! LOL!!
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
Comment removed
FrankCIanton 1 month ago
@FrankCIanton There you go again Frank. In true conspiracy theorist form you make up "facts" to fit your needs.
I give you credit Frank; at least you're consistent and that's an admirable trait.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
Comment removed
FrankCIanton 1 month ago
Comment removed
FrankCIanton 1 month ago
Comment removed
FrankCIanton 1 month ago
Comment removed
FrankCIanton 1 month ago 5
@FrankCIanton I've never sent FrankClanton a private message and I've never sent anyone a message about stealing a car or bubblegum at Walmart.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago 5
@LoneNutter1 Please answer the question in the form it is posed.
Do you deny sending the private message?
FrankCIanton 1 month ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
@FrankCIanton (pssst..frank..look below. i already answered your question)
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 Could you please tell the channel who FrankClanton is and why you have not sent the said FrankClanton a private message saying you have never stolen a car or bubblegum at Walmart??
DonaId6899 1 month ago 15
This has been flagged as spam show
@DonaId6899 Why would 8 people give a thumbs up on this inane comment?
Because the same person is giving "thumbs up" under different identities.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@migo53333 Don't worry about it. Neither does LoneNutter1. LOL
2012Iivestream 1 month ago 22
@LoneNutter1 Ok mr. lonenutter, the daltex sniper was in the 2nd or 3rd floor window.....the police searched the building IMMEDIATELY!!!! and came out with a young man wearing a black leather and black gloves.....the crowd was trying to attack him....they put him in a car and drove away....the entire incident was never reported.......
migo53333 1 month ago 17
@migo53333 Don't let this con man LoneCrapper1 kid you with his bullshit questions. He knows NOTHING about the JFK assassination!! He can't even tell the difference between Gordon Arnold and Arnold Rowland!!! LOL He's a complete asshole and troll!
cymrutroIl 1 month ago
@cymrutroIl Thanks cymrutroll.......i like your style!
migo53333 1 month ago 13
@migo53333 @LoneNutter1 is an asshole. Treat him like an asshole! He thinks he's smarter than you. He's just a sad old cocksucker fuckhead. LOL Remember that when you reply to the fuckrag @LoneNutter1.
cymrutroIl 1 month ago 18
This has been flagged as spam show
@cymrutroIl I AM much smarter that you. You never see my posts filled with maniacal rantings or swearing, bullying and attempts to intimidate by name calling. That's all you pro conspiracy people can do.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@cymrutroIl He is. The names don't help. His mind is as closed as a woman in a chastity belt. Ignorance is a sad state to be in. He tells idiotic lies such as that witnesses saw Oswald shoot Kennedy. Even the Warren Commission wasn't that stupid!
erickadd
tregoj1 1 week ago
@cymrutroIl Thanks for the glowing endorsement. If my comments upset you because they're fact based, that means I'm doing a great job.
LoneNutter1 6 days ago
@LoneNutter1 No need to thank anyone for telling the truth.
You ARE " a sad old cocksucker fuckhead "
Now be reasoned, rational and mature!
MrTroIIol 6 days ago
@MrTroIIol Be reasoned, rational and mature?????
After the language you just used???
Rational and mature?????
You're delusional! LOL!!!
LoneNutter1 6 days ago
@LoneNutter1 Be reasoned, rational and mature and stop insulting other YouTube users and keep your sick sarcasm to yourself. Is that asking too much? Asshole!
MrTroIIol 5 days ago
@LoneNutter1 We know all about your multiple identities.
KiIIU99 5 days ago
@LoneNutter1 How are the wind speeds in Dealey Plaza?? Have you solved the Gordon Arnold / Arnold Rowland problem yet?? LOL
cymrutroIl 1 month ago
@LoneNutter1 " Read the posting again. The key word is theory. And in typical conspiracy thinking, there's difficulty differentiating the words "theory"and "fact"."
Yes. That's true. You have ALWAYS had problems with theory/ practice.
Your wind speeds of 75 mph in Dealey Plaza on 22 November 1963 is a perfect example of your inability to distinguish between reality and what goes on in that sick little "brain" of yours. Don't worry! @migo53333 is here to put you straight! LOL
cymrutroIl 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nicenonya3 A clear sign of a limited vocabulary and an inability to express yourself.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoneNutter1 " A clear sign of a limited vocabulary and an inability to express yourself."
Who the fuck are you posting to? My, you really have a great opinion of yourself! LOL
You are in NO position to comment on other people's limited vocabulary! LOL
You monosyllabic cunt!!
usuIkane 1 month ago 7
Black op radio-2nd floor TSBD -JFK Absolute Proof
nicenonya3 2 months ago
Black op radio-2nd floor TSBD -JFK Absolute Proof-on youtube
nicenonya3 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@nicenonya3 There was no "black-op" radio found on the 2nd floor!
If the assassination was carried out by a "black-op" do you think they would be stupid enough to leave behind one of their radios?
You conspiracy nuts will believe anything as long as it's "conspiratorial".
Most people don't believe you anymore anyway. 70% of people believe Oswald did it.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@LoneNutter1 What grade did you drop out off,1st or 2nd?
nicenonya3 2 months ago 6
In reply to your question LoneNutter1,i'm still studying a lot of other peoples research,sorting the wheat from the chaff. Many different groups wanted JFK gone and all were spurious. With LHO i think its almost certain he was CIA or FBI or both,he was obviously involved in some way but not sure he was the killer,he certainly had some dubious contacts. Whoever was involved J Egar Hoover and LBJ must have had knowledge to effect such an effective cover up.Warren Comission equals cover up.
edge78a 2 months ago
LoneNutter1 = TROLL
CarltonBowlTrouser 2 months ago 37
@CarltonBowlTrouser... no doubt!
nicenonya3 1 month ago 13
This has been flagged as spam show
A book suppository is needed for those who believe the official story. A book that could fit this bill is "Oswald and the CIA" by John Newman. It could be microfilmed, then placed inside a small dissolvable suppository and shoved up the asses of the idiots that believe a lone gunman executed this without any help from anyone. By mental telepathy, he was able to change the route, and force the Secret Service to drop their coverage of the topless limo!
FalseFlag369 2 months ago
There is just too much alteration of witness testimony and evidence lost or confiscated to give any other conclusion than a cover up or conspiracy.The verdict was out almost immediately after the shooting, ignoring witness testimony regarding the grassy knoll,these questions have never been answered so its obvious people will still be looking for answers.
edge78a 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@edge78a There are dozens of different theories about who masterminded the assassination of JFK.
Which theory do you believe is the correct one?
Why is your theory the correct one and all the others wrong?
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@LoneNutter1 dude because only ONE can be correct......get over it!!! we live in a corrupt world......you cannot handle the truth.....your bugging out in denial......this world was built on conspiracies....why do we praise Columbus....since you were a child you were told that he was a wonderful man who discovered the new world.......what they failed to leave out is the FACT that he slaughtered many of the native carribeans, mostly of hispaniol and set up a slave trade back to europe.....!
migo53333 2 months ago
@migo53333 You've not provided anything of merit to be considered with any seriousness whatsoever. Flashes of light- men by a fence- a man running and Columbus killing the natives.
There's the Kennedy assassination all wrapped up and the conspiracy uncovered.
Columbus did it.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@LoneNutter1 my friend, it doesnt matter what anyone says to you........you r very narrow minded.....its kind of sad......if you had any logic at putting 2+2 together the columbus analogy proves that we have been deceived before....we" ve been lied to on a grand scale....its been typed into our textbooks they even have knights of columbus affiliated with the catholic church..........you dont get it.......take care
migo53333 2 months ago
@migo53333 I do "get it". Following your reasoning you can say anything that happened in history is a result of a conspiracy and a planned deception. And that is pure bunk. You don't make any sense whatsoever.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@LoneNutter1 sorry mr. lone nutter but i had to return to bring up one more question........how did that bullet hit the curb 200 feet down towards the overpass causing the concrete to shatter and hit james tague in the face....maybe u can explain the trajectory......
migo53333 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@migo53333 No I can't. Nor will I try for the following reasons;
1. There's doubt as to what struck the concrete. Was it the bullet or a bullet fragment?
2. There's doubt as to which fragment struck Tague. Was it from the missed shot or the third shot when the bullet fragmented?
3. There's a new theory that the first shot LHO fired struck the traffic light at the intersection of Houston and Elm. A fragment of the bullet could have struck Tague.
Conspiracy believers love to attach major
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@migo53333 significance to something that cannot be explained. They have a history of demanding that everything be proven. And if something can't be proven (to their satisfaction) they immediately assume it's proof a conspiracy took place. They love to argue "lack of evidence IS evidence". That kind of logic is childish and tragically flawed. In a court of law any lawyer using that argument would be ridiculed and laughed out of the building.
LoneNutter1 1 month ago
@migo53333 Ignore the asshole troll and jerk @LoneNutter1
virtuaI4desires 1 month ago
and in my opinion gorden arnold is a poor example for a witness......i think hes a flake again check out the testimony of the guys on the overpass
migo53333 2 months ago
how did gary mack go from being an enthusiastic conspiracy buff to curator of the 6th floor museum, and lone gunman lee oswald did it alone theorist...
migo53333 3 months ago
@migo53333 Because he came to his senses and realized there's nothing to any of the conspiracy theories.
LoneNutter1 3 months ago
@LoneNutter1 no..... i think he saw the lucrative opportunity......place will never go out of business......sorry, but this was a conspiracy......start with the mark lane interviews.....more and more the finger points in the direction of Johnson.......i think i will stick to Hunts statements....the man was a player, to say the least.....he was dying....had nothing more to gain or lose my friend....you nonchalantly wave off an ocean of circumstance.....obviously oswald was a player.....
migo53333 3 months ago
@migo53333 The lucrative opportunity lies with the conspiracy theorists who written books, make videos and major motion pictures. Mark Lane was the first of the opportunists and decades later we have over 1,000 books written about the assassination with the overwhelming majority being conspiratorially themed. But there'a a major problem with these "conspiracy books" They have different plotters with different motives using different gunmen using different rifles with different ammo firing
LoneNutter1 3 months ago
@LoneNutter1 change how you r looking at this........only one theory is correct......a crossfire.....all the noise is a distraction..it doesnt matter how many theories exist.......conspiracies have existed through out history.....this is no different.......your mind does not allow more than one shooter to exist, no matter what any evidence says....
migo53333 3 months ago
@migo53333
When there is no physical, ballistic, medical or forensic evidence of a crossfire why should I believe it occurred in Dallas?
When there is no physical, ballistic, medical or forensic evidence of a second gunman or a shot from the knoll or fence, or the triple underpass, or the Dal-Tex building, or the sewer, or from another window in the TSBD why should I believe it occurred? My mind keys on on facts and evidence and not speculation, supposition, innuendo or rumor.
LoneNutter1 3 months ago
@LoneNutter1 Uummmm....maybe you can start with the parkland doctors who were the first to see the wounds....they called the neck an entrance wound......and also head shot to right temple area blowing off the back portion of the head.....i can fire a rifle from any location and not leave behind any evidence that i was there in that location.....the guy in the tower behind the grassy knoll lee bowers, witnessed 2 men behind fence and then a flash from their location.....3 shots bang.....bang,bang
migo53333 3 months ago
@migo53333 Eyewitness testimony is highly unreliable. That's why the medical, physical, ballistic and forensic evidence is relied upon whenever there's a murder. We know the Dr. at Parkland were wrong about the neck wound. The physical evidence (JFK's shirt) showed the fibers around his collar and neck tie were all moving away from the victim. This clearly shows the bullet exited his throat. They were wrong about the head wound. How could they have seen the back of his head when they never
LoneNutter1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoneNutter1 shut up stupid!
nicenonya3 2 months ago
@migo53333 turned him over. So how could they see the back of his head when his head was resting in a cradle and they never turned him over? It's completely unreasonable for there to have been multiple gunman in the plaza due to its small size. Someone firing from the knoll would have been seen. In fact, of all the hundreds of people who were in Dealey Plaza not one person ( Including Jean Hill) saw anyone shooting from the knoll or any other location except for the 6th floor of the TSBD.
LoneNutter1 3 months ago
@LoneNutter1 shut up stupid!
nicenonya3 2 months ago 31
@nicenonya3 Typical conspiracy loon. Total absence of any factual understanding of the assassination and they resort to bullying tactics.
I'm not going away knucklehead.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@LoneNutter1 you are the knucklehead,99% of youtube folks know that!yOU MUST BE PAID BY THE cia ,NOBODY COULD BE A STUPID AS YOU!!!nobody!!!
nicenonya3 2 months ago
@nicenonya3 The only people dumber than I are the folks who believe in a conspiracy.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@LoneNutter1 only a true retard would believe Oswald even shot anyone!
nicenonya3 2 months ago
@nicenonya3 That's the very best comment you could make??
You conspiracy people are limited.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@LoneNutter1 listen to e howard hunts deathbed confession......u probably dont even know who hunt was or how significant a player he was.........you sound like a warren commission believer........again check out interview titled jfk shooter seen running from picket fence.......and then checkout the railroad workers who were on the triple underpass.....
migo53333 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@migo53333 The Hunt "confession" is subject to interpretation. You can read into it whatever you want. It would be nice if Hunt were still alive so his claims could be corroborated. There are other legitimate considerations; was Hunt of sound mind? Unknown.Was Hunt making this "confession" freely or was it made under duress? Unknown. It it really the voice of Hunt? Unknown.
Regarding the shooter running from the picket fence; Who said they saw a shooter running from the fence? Ed Hoffman?
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@migo53333 Ed Hoffman was over 200 yards away from the back of the grassy knoll and would have to have supreme vision to see what he claims he saw. Plus, he'd have to have X-ray vision because a billboard stood between him and the back of the knoll. Are you relying on Lee Bowers as a witness? Lee never saw anyone with a rifle on the knoll and he never saw anyone shooting at JFK. In fact, nobody saw anyone shooting at JFK from the knoll. But multiple witnesses saw a gunman in the 6th floor
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@migo53333 of the TSBD shooting at the president. The railroad workers didn't see anyone shooting at the president nor did they see anyone running away from the fence. Neither did the police officer who was on the bridge with the railroad workers. The most they saw was a "puff of smoke". That's interesting. Rifles emit trace amounts of smoke and it was windy in Dealey Plaza that day. How could they have seen smoke from a rifle on a windy day? Are you aware of what the 9 forensic pathologists
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@migo53333 for the HSCA said it their report to the commission? No evidence of the president being shot from the front or side. So why are we looking for a gunman where none was seen and no medical, physical, forensic or ballistic evidence says one was there? It's 100% CT'er foolishness that searches for something that was never there.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@migo53333 you can check out parkland doctor interviews present day and they still say entrance wound in throat......also check out interviews with the railroad workers on the triple underpass.....shots last shot came from grassy knoll........check out interview Jfk shooter seen running from fence.....was that guy hallucinating.....how about many people saying sound of shots was bang........bang.bang
migo53333 2 months ago
@migo53333 Im going to believe the doctors......first shot entered kennedy in upper back ...this is the shot that made him cringe up and bring his hands up.....if you research it you would know that this bullet only entered the body about 2 inches deep and stopped....this was the pristine bullet found on the stretcher........you still havnt explained Bang...............Bang Bang!!
migo53333 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@migo53333 Why don't you check out the report from the 9 forensic pathologists from the HSCA? All of them said there is no evidence of the president being shot from the front or side. All of them said JFK was struck twice by shots fired from above and behind. The medical, ballistic, and physical evidence supports this as well. Plus, there were no witnesses who saw someone on the knoll firing at JFK. There were multiple witness who saw a rifle firing from the 6th floor of the TSBD. Check it out.
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
@migo53333 from different locations firing a different number of shots and all the gunman escape Dealey Plaza by different means. The problem is...all of these theories can't be correct. At best, only one might be correct. In your opinion Johnson seems to be the culprit/mastermind behind the killing. What do you say to those who say Cuban exiles did it or the Illuminati, or the Vatican? What makes the theory you believe the correct one and all the others incorrect?
LoneNutter1 3 months ago
@LoneNutter1 ummm lee bowers saw men behind the fence and then a flash or something he couldnt explain......ummm there was a building engineer on the building opposite side of dealey plaza...lane interviewed him on the roof of the building and he explained and pointed too the parking lot behind the knoll and how he saw a man running after the shots to behind the tsbd....hmmmmmmm....
migo53333 2 months ago
@migo53333 Two men by a fence and a flash of light. Well the ONLY thing that could have happened is they must have fired a rifle at the president. There's no other possible explanation for two men and a flash of light. Now we have the rooftop engineer interviewed by that bastion of truth Mark Lane. He says (from over 200 yards away) he saw one man running after he shots. More concrete conclusive evidence of someone shooting a rifle from the knoll. Someone saw a man running. Wow! That's amazing!
LoneNutter1 2 months ago
Gordon Arnold is the worst actor I've ever seen. Anyone with a trace of humanity and common sense, can see he's acting. The big movements of the head, the staged incoherency, the shifting of his body language. J'accuse! Gordon Arnold is a liar and a fraud.
sugarydonkey 4 months ago
THE HEAD SHOT CAME FROM THE STORM DRAIN WHERE A GUNMAN WAS WAITING ALSO ALONG WITH BADGE MAN THEY BOTH SHOT JFK, MAY THEY NEVER HAVE PEACE FOR WHAT THEY DID, ALL OF THEM.
cruisersism 5 months ago
1. The heads are way too small
2. The faces display more detail than the straight wall.
3. The shooter, if in this position had a wall between himself and JFK.
ProtectAus 5 months ago
this is undoubtedly the best of video evidence.... nice video.
tigersoup 6 months ago
James Files wasn't wearing a police uniform. He was dressed in a jacket like the railway workers who were behind that area.
ignatei 6 months ago
The guy with the hard hat looks more like a grey alien!!! pause and look at the black eyes..............strange
dagssuper64 6 months ago
This Moorman photo was also enhanced professionally by R.I.T. with a special machine with a red laser that recorded every piece of the photo. After a point they stopped enhancing, apparently afraid of the controversy ,but showed better resolution than Jack White's photo, I think before. It was a clear that there was a man with a cop uniform and a muzzle blast in front of his face. If Gordon is lying, how could he have predicted everything in a photo that wasn't enhanced yet? Psychic?
NavahoFish 6 months ago
Gordon Arnold should met the man I have known: if not wearing his army uniform: he would not havegotten out of Texas and sent to alaska. Few people can say they saw the grassy knoll gun man: but I saw and worked with him for two years: and after giving his identity tried to shot me down: I am bullet proof: and that killer knows it: Christ Peter; the son of God. Can the people find me as President before 140 million voters are killed by Federal Gun Bank hired murderers? And what is my name?
mirror49mirror49 7 months ago
ican see an elephant standing next to badge man too !!! F F S !! REALLY?
tim6578 7 months ago
SHOCKING EVIL FUCKS THIS SHIT WINDS ME UP BIG TIME
fuckilluminatiscum 7 months ago
Dorothy Kilgallen, a crime reporter of the New York Journal, obtained a private interview with Jack Ruby. She told friends that she had information that would "break the case wide open". Aware of what had happened to Bill Hunter and Jim Koethe, she handed her interview notes to her friend Margaret Smith. On 8th November, 1965, Kilgallen, was found dead. It was reported she had committed suicide. Her friend, Margaret Smith, died two days later.
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561 Kilgallen was a gossip columnist, not a crime reporter. Her death was ruled an accidental combination of alcohol and barbituates, not suicide.
furryisthenewedgy 7 months ago
@furryisthenewedgy So was MM.
ed11561 7 months ago
@furryisthenewedgy So was MM. On 8th November, 1965, Kilgallen, was found dead. It was reported she had committed suicide. Her friend, Margaret Smith, died two days later.
ed11561 7 months ago
"Badgeman" is made of light, shadow and an creative imagination.He'd have to be 30" tall or standing on a step ladder firing a rifle 16-20 feet in the air in the middle of the parking lot behind the knoll. To believe Arnold you have to believe "Badgeman" is real, fired a rifle at JFK, climbed over the fence, accosted Arnold, spoke to Arnold, stoke Arnold's camera, left the area on foot and was not seen by anyone else in Dealey Plaza.
autoad 9 months ago
Gordon Arnold was full of shit. You mean to tell me that seconds after the President is killed, a man with a gun comes out from behind the fence, beats up on Arnold, who is on the ground in front of the fence, takes Arnold's camera, and no one else in Dealey Plaza saw what would have been in plain sight? Bullshit!
BavisTrickle 9 months ago 2
@BavisTrickle - I agree that Gordon Arnold was full of shit. There were cameras that rolled and showed people up on the grassy knoll shortly after and the badgeman would not have had time to accost him. Complete nonsense.
nycboyforlife 8 months ago
@BavisTrickle Yeah. Sad thing is the fact that there are several people filming the knoll area within seconds of the shooting, and not one of them show Arnold in that area. If what he says took place actually did take place, then the groundskeeper, Emmett Hudson, would have seen it all, as he lay on the steps that lead to the pergola on the knoll for over a minute.
IwshIcldstrtover 7 months ago
@BavisTrickle It would be in plain sight. It was between a fence and a wall. And as you can see in part 2 Senator Yarborough heard a shot and saw a man dive and said he thought to himself it was an infantryman. The wall was in front of the fence and there were spaces in the fence to get to Arnold. If he wasn't there he couldn't have predicted what was in the photo anyway.
NavahoFish 6 months ago
@BavisTrickle I meant would not be in plain sight.
NavahoFish 6 months ago
Imagine if they had modern cameras back then..
DrFreerun 10 months ago
Lucien Sarti is the badgeman.google him. He shot the headshot. Get over it ppl.
neilzep 10 months ago
I think the "badgeman" is Gordon Arnold. I can't see two other figures there and I've zoomed in to the pixel level of a scan of the Mooreman Polaroid. I also believe the picture was taken before the final headshot, not after. You can line up the position of Mooreman in the Zap. film and see when she would've taken the picture. In other words there would be no muzzle flash or smoke visible in Mooreman polaroid. If you open the Mooreman photo in photoshop you can see that it's Arnold, not a cop.
crackerjackcaddilac 11 months ago
On the grassy knoll, there were two of jack ruby's "gang" members. One shot and missed. Then Lee Harvey Oswald, who was hired by Jack Ruby, shot JFK in the spine. That caused JFK's arms to go up. After that shot, the other man on the grassy knoll shot and killed the president. All of which the government covered up by destoying all evidence.
xXChargerXx24 11 months ago
@xXChargerXx24 And you haven't a single shred of evidence to support your screwy theory.
LoneNutter1 11 months ago
I can see that some people here, have not read the Warren Commission testimony from Bowers, the railroad watchman. It would also have helped if the Feds did not destroy all the photographic evidence from Dealey that day. The stark reality is that it doesn't matter who shot him from which part of Dealey, it is more important to know why? Then who? Than how! Here's a clue - he was killed in Texas, now go figure!
eddied111 11 months ago
@eddied111 What photographic evidence did the government destroy?
LoneNutter1 11 months ago
I believe something fishy about the whole single shooter thing..But this video does nothing but show imagination.
mike62mcmanus 1 year ago
he is telling nonsense. There were no shoots from the grassy knoll. Get over it.
Maggo309 1 year ago
Q:If Gordon Arnold was where he said he was, how come he's not in the Moorman photo?
A: Because he was not there.
autoad 1 year ago
@autoad that is the Moorman photo which shows "badgeman", "hardhat" and "arnold". weren't you listening?
rnbsnemtp 11 months ago
@rnbsnemtpClaims of the government destroying any film or photos is totally absurd. You have no proof they did and the logistics required to pull off the faking or destruction of film/photos would have been impossible.
You conspiracy loons make yourselves irrelevant when you engage in making irresponsible and false accusations. It's safe to say that you people have done more to destroy the credibility of any future investigations due to your foolish, wacky and unsubstantiated charges.
autoad 11 months ago
@autoad Saying that the gov't doing those things, "is absurd", is itself closeminded. Gov'ts throughout history and around the world have often done those types of things. Why would you think that just because it's the American gov't, that it's absurd? Probably because, like a lot of Americans you have the naive belief that we're "above" that sort of thing or that we're incapable of it just by virtue of being American. Therein lies your blindspot. Being a blind spot... you wont see it.
mrfester42 9 months ago
@mrfester42 My objection to the claims of the government destroying or altering photographs/film in Dealey Plaza has nothing to do with being "American". It has to do with logistics.
It's not possible for the government to destroy or alter all of the photos and all of the film used that day. They would have to know the name of every person who used a camera. We're aware of those who took film that day from the photos we've seen. But we know there were lots of other people taking pictures we
autoad 9 months ago
@mrfester42 haven't seen because we see these people taking photos in the Zapruder/Nix/Muchmore/Hughes/Bronson films. We know the photos exist and their likely stored away in a closet. A few years ago photos were brought to the 6th Floor Museum by Jay Skaggs who thought his photos were of little value. (Gee..I guess the government missed those pictures) He had the photos stored away because he said they didn't show anything about the actual shooting and thought they were of no value.
autoad 9 months ago
@mrfester42 In addition, if the government was going to alter photos, they'd have to alter all the photos so they'd be in agreement with each other. If they missed one photo it would reveal the plot to "fudge" the pictures. Logistically, that's impossible!
Plus, there is ZERO evidence the government confiscated /altered/destroyed photos from Dealey Plaza.The accusation is ridiculous and without merit.
autoad 9 months ago
Coup de ta in the USA.....land of the free...my ass...go ask the native americans and the blacks...they allready know
neilzep 1 year ago
i don't trust gordon arnold
diegoverdegiglio 1 year ago
If the Warren commission didn't ignore Mr. Arnold and all the other credible witnesses WHO WERE ACTUALLY THERE, then theworld would know the truth. But instead they decided to fuck around and pin the blame on a patsy, known to be a poor shot at best. LHO is innocent.
raran44 1 year ago
Or delusional. But you're correct. This is an absolute crock. There were people behind the fence and in front of it. You'd be spotted with a rifle right away. But as long as there's a few bucks to be made, these lame witnesses will keep discovering things they forgot on the day but suddenly remembered almost fifty years later.
Snedger 1 year ago
Let me explain something to you idiots, I've been to the grassy knoll, I've stood behind the Fence, the Grassy Knoll was the absolute worst place to shoot a gun that day, you would have been seen by every single person within 100 feet, the moment the gun fired you would have been seen, there is no get away from behind the fence, you are at ground level, no where to go. Period. For anyone to believe that a gun was fired there that day do yourselves a favor, get help, you are dilutional.
northbeachson 1 year ago
@northbeachson I've got news pal, ive been there too. It's very easy to shoot from there. Any tree growth (obstruction) wouldn't have been a problem 47 years ago. Also, the "badgeman figure" was disguised as a cop. So obviously, no one would bother a cop. And he wasn't caught because all the real cops were dicking around in the School book depository. And if you look at the zapruder film, kennedy is thrown back ward and to the left, indicating a shot from the right front.
raran44 1 year ago
@raran44 Sounds like you're reaching for straws, Kennedy is thrown forward first then back, watch the Zapruder film in slow motion, he's already tilted to his left after the throat shot.
northbeachson 1 year ago
Comment removed
northbeachson 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@raran44 You're missing the point, I didn't say it wasn't easy to shoot from there, ANY shot from there would have been heard and seen by every person within a hundred feet, every person, not a few. Shooters dressed as cops, you're a riot.
northbeachson 1 year ago