Added: 2 years ago
From: MichaelSavage4Prez
Views: 3,301
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (136)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Michael Savage - THE failure of evolution.

  • Michael Savage has also said that the story of Adam and Eve is a fairy tale which showed then why is it in the bible then. It shows that if you believe Evolution you have to discard many ideas in the bible. Why would God say they he took the rib of Adam and gave it to Eve if we evolved. That story has to be 100% false. Furthermore, natural selection has never created a NEW SPECIES. At best it was just a temp adaptation of the time.

  • einstein did not believed in a god, nor theist or deist, hell i thought savage isnt ignorant but saying that is ridiculous.

  • First Savage says God is evolution then he says evolution is God's tool. Which is it, Mr Savage? I personally believe evolution is God's tool!

  • I like Micheals veiw on science and religion. I can totally agree with this. It goes both ways for believers in one or the other but not both. I personally think there is more evidence that what we call gods are actually ETs who did some gene splicing with what was already evolving.

  • We would anyone even bother talking to this guy. He's a rude, loud mouthed bully. He doesn't give any of his callers room to speak or explain themselves.

  • Savage is crazy, but he;'s not the Simple minded Conservative like Hannity, Limbaugh, BEck. He's a bright man too.

  • ya, Michael he was "experimenting with his new creations" about 90,000 years after they emerged. damn this guy's retarded by 2 of the real foul seeds of ignorance in the world, religion and the demonizing of drugs

  • this guy savage is completely nuts, and what he talks about makes no sense.

  • Michael Savage = NWO agent

  • the reason evolution and Creation are both not compatible is that it makes no sense for God not to create everything right the first time, even if you are an evolutionist, you have to think that they both can't be right, savage is basically saying God just kind of created "stuff" then stood back and let it all create itself, I find this hard to believe

  • I arrived at this conclusion in an opposite manner. I did'nt belive in God until I better understood evolution. To me and from what I know it is close to deifinative proof there is a God. I would go so far as to say it is the God in the Bible, but an inteligent desighner nonetheless.

  • @creationofself sounds like you believe in the classical deistic god favored by enlightenment thinkers

  • Religion is brain washing but scientist can not be brain washed is that your assertion,

    Darwinism has holes in it, I believe in evolution, micro evolution not macro evolution, there is no evidence of one species evolving into another show me one and I will believe it.

  • I'm not into creationist nore do in fact I support evolution but perhaps giving the guy a chance to talk would not be hugely decremental.... between the start and the three minute mark there....sounded like O'raily

  • God is nothing but stupid superstitious baggage that people hold on to from ancient times when people didn't understand any of the natural laws that govern this universe and the phenomena within it. To say that evolution is god is nothing more than putting another label onto something that already has a label. It accomplishes nothing and only shows that the god concept is unfalsifiable in the mind of the person who engages in this tomfoolery.

  • @gtg309v I agree completely. I usually agree with savage, but he's flawed when he asserts that since man didn't create the universe, god must've. It didn't necessarily have to have a "who" as the creator. It could've been a "what."

  • @DaCrazyJiffyLubeGuy

    There is no creator, you idiot.

    Savage is a pantheist, he believes GOD is NATURE.

    Einstein, Spinoza, Descartes were ALL PANTHEISTS.

    We're in good company, you idiot.

  • @Romansteel13, Savage is jewish moron. Einstein was a deist by the way.

  • @Nashhinton

    Wrong. Einstein was a PANTHEIST.

    IDIOT.

    HE had a PORTRAIT OF SPINOZA IN HIS STUDY ROOM.

    MORON.

    Yes, you're right.

    Savage is JEWISH, he was born a JEW. But his RELIGION IS PANTHEISM.

    IDIOT.

    GO GARGLE WITH ROGAINE!

  • @Romansteel13, Dude. Go look it up on the internet. Type in Michael Savage Religion in the search engine. It will say he's jewish. Next type in Albert Einstein Religion in the search engine. IT will say he's either atheist or Deist. Use the Bing or Google search engine. You're a moron

  • @Nashhinton Being a JEW is not secluded only to religion, MORON. HE IS BORN A JEW. IT'S ALSO A RACE. That is the POINT YOU ARE MISSING, like the DUMB STUDENT YOU ARE. I am your professor, I am educating you, you should pay me via paypal. How moronic you are. GOOGLE JEWISH RACE. THEY ARE A TRIBE OF CAUCASIANS IN THE MIDDLE EAST. IDIOT. They descended from the ANCIENT ISRAELITES. TAKE A HISTORY LESSON, KID. Good day, done owning you psychologically.
  • @Romansteel13, Judaism is a race. Thanks for that information. *rolls eyes*

  • Comment removed

  • @Romansteel13, You sound like youre obsessed with Savage. I am too. Smart man.

  • @Nashhinton

    Never said Judaism was a race, you did.

    Putting words in my mouth.

    I specifically referred to the tribe of people who descended from the Ancient Israelites.

    The Jews of Canaan. The Hebrew language and race which they gave the world, plus MONOTHEISM.

    LEARN YOUR HISTORY FRIEND, for you are doomed to repeat it.

    Your idiocy and hypocrisy knows no bounds.

  • @gtg309v No

  • Someone should direct Glenn Beck to this video.

  • i have a very similar view on God and evolution that M.S has but is it just me? or is savage forgetting the cause of evolution, which is natural selection? 

  • What came first the chicken or the egg?

  • @SwissBullion The chicken came first, cos the egg couldn't run.

  • "Of course there's a Common Designer. He's called God" - Michael Savage. Of course. There's a little man floating around the heavens making things. Never been seen but that doesn't matter. Of course he's there. The Bible says so. I know Savage is a moron, I just don't understand why he has a following.

  • @indoctus41

    "There's a little man floating around the heavens making things. Never been seen but that doesn't matter. Of course he's there. The Bible says so. I know Savage is a moron, I just don't understand why he has a following."

    You are a moron. An absolute idiot, I can't believe i'm actually going to spend 2 minutes of my time, trying to penetrate that stupid skull of yours, which is rampant with stupidity. God is not a man, I do not know where you got this fallacious idea from.

  • @Groogfish

    Thank you for existing........I'm glad we are all hear to exist and nothing else......Agnostic atheist is an oxymoron, like little big or something nothing.

    First and foremost I love Dr. Savage but .....Cambrian explosion is point one. Point 2 is abiogensis has never been proven and point 3 is like chancey said there has never been a positive genetic mutation and never a mutation from species to species

  • There are many different species of Finches. They have adapted to better live in their different habitats, A Finch can adapt and evolve with different colors of feathers for example and a new species of Finch can evolve but a Finch can never evolve into anything other than another species of Finch. Human Beings can evolve over time but a human can give birth to nothing other than a human. Maybe im wrong tho and a crocodile layed an egg and out popped a chicken.

    ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION

  • Finally a conservative who understands science! I thought I was the only one!!! However I disagree about there being a God but I completely respect your point of view, Michael. Thank you for existing.

  • @GroogFish dude many do, you just don't see them on liberal tv

  • Im afraid it just doesnt work that way savage. You cant have your cake and eat it too. If you believe in evolution then you might as well throw the idea of god out the window. Its ironic, not too long ago it was ridiculus to accept the idea of evolution working together with christianity. *sigh* Come on savage....

  • He obviously can't read the bible.

  • Well at least Michael doesn't literally believe in the bible. Him believing in some supernatural being is fine with me, not as wacky, he remains intelligent in my eyes :-P

  • @ManofManyPasswords he tries to make a point God has a chosen superior race, as bible Jews. Others are servants that is his politics. He do not beleve genetic segregation through evolution which ends every race to have its own potential and quality to survive nature.

    There are also some scietists who wrongly conclude as if there is some kind of inteligence in one race not in other race.

  • He's absolutely right. He knows a lot about the mind of the fundies. "Why must you have a childish believe in Adam and Eve to get up in the morning." This statement shows he has a deeper understanding of the issue. Evolution is the best theory to fit the known facts. Evolution does not mean there is no god.

  • @FormerFundie2004 yes if yo believe in evolution Bible is out of equation. Other spiritual books also are canceled because they do not have different explanation than Bible. They are all same.

  • Gorilla should have evolved just as man did. Gorillas are fiercely intelligent, gorillas should have citys that rival human citys. What happened, why the gap in technology? Yes, they can use tools, but why do they not develop "technology?"

  • I believe man was not a "mistake." We were specifically "created" by someone or something. Man and monkey both have five fingers, toes, two arms and legs, two eyes, one nose, one mouth, and two ears. But why is it man has all this "technology" and monkeys living in the jungle are still "primitive?" If evolution is real, why can they not find the "missing link?" I leave my mind open for many possibility's, but this is the one thing i cannot logically explain.

  • There is a god.The fact that reality exsists is proof enough.Human beings (we) are so arrogant to say they(with the little they know), don't believe in god.What makes them think god believes in most of them.

  • @cogen65 Why, with what little you know, do you believe in a God? Don't you see how radical your own point of view is. We are all agnostic. You are an agnostic creationist, and I am an agnostic atheist.

  • its unbelievable how dumb religion is and the people who believe it... humans might as well be fucking monkeys believing in fairy tail stories.

  • Michael savage is an independent (his words). I dont agree with all his views, but he has a science background. Everyone with a science background (that's not delutional or an idiot) accepts evolution. True, evolution is a challenge to Christians like myself, but it's ok. God doesn't like sluggards!

  • In the Beginning God created Man in his image.

  • In the beginning of your life, god created you to be a blind sheep as well.

  • Kabbalism.

  • (cont)

    and then there is the fact that the bible said god made man in his own image and likeness, i highly doubt god is a monkey especially since us humans look way better than apes and such.

    and if we really did 'evolve' from apes why are tere still some around (O_o)

  • we didn't "evolve from apes"

    humans (which are apes) and the other modern great apes (and monkies) had a common ancestor

    apes and monkies are just as evolved as humans

    science doesn't rely on faith, it relies on observation, experimentaion and establishment of facts

    if a scientist could prove the earth wasn't billions of years old then he/she would get a nobel prize, do you know why it hasn't been done? because the earth IS billions of years old, it's a fact

  • 'a scientist could prove the earth wasn't billions of years old then he/she would get a nobel prize, do you know why it hasn't been done?'

    A how do you know they cant

    B how do you know it wouldnt get suppressed so as to keep the funding coming and keep ppl away from god and the knowledge that they have been taken for fools

    'because the earth IS billions of years old, it's a fact'

    how do u know this, cause u yourself say it or cause u have faith that what u c in text books is the truth

  • you have no reason to believe the earth is anything other than billions of years old unless you rely on scripture which itself makes no claims about the age of the earth

    i believe in an ancient earth because i know how science works, you it seems do not

    you rely on science to give you clean water, food that is safe to eat, electricity to heat your house, fuel for your car and medicine, but the EXACT SAME SCIENCE says the earth is around 4.5 billion years old and you don't believe it?

    weak

  • actually if you knew anything about the bible you would know that based on certain parts it give the idea that its about 4000-5000 years old (big difference from x hundred million etc)

    u no y i dont believe it , cause science always changes its story, i have only seen in books and herd from the media that its that old and we all know they cant be falsified, all the time i hear of scientists that make up lies to get famous casue there lifes work is a waste (copenhagen is the latest)

  • you assume a lot, i know the bible very well

    there is no scripture that says how long ago the earth formed, none, if you believe differently then please provide the biblical reference

    you have been fed a lie by people you trust but when we discover facts about the world that contradict our beliefs, we change our beliefs, not the facts

  • how stupid do you haveto be to not be able to read

    'based on certain parts it give the idea that its about 4000-5000 years old (big difference from x hundred million etc)'

    where in that did i say there was a specific scripture. and no you dont know the bible 'very well' or you would know that

  • and then there is the FACT that if science only gave facts, then nothing would ever be dis proven. and that is obviously not the case as shit is dis proven all the time meaning its not fact

    and what does science giving ppl 'clean water, food that is safe to eat, electricity to heat your house, fuel for your car and medicine' have to do with how old the world is (your logic is fucked) those two thing aren't related at all

    this is getting boring now, im done with your foolishness

    u r the weak 1

  • do you mean science makes discoveries that increase our knowledge of the world around us and some of those discoveries prove old beliefs wrong?

    congratualtions, that's what science does

    my point was that the same science that gives us all those things, things you rely on every day, also tells us that the world is around 4,5 billion years old, it's the same science

    how old do you think the earth is and what reason do you have for believing the world is not around 4.5 billion years old?

  • what i mean is exactly what i said, if you have any question then go reread it. (if you can read)

    'and then there is the FACT that if science only gave facts, then nothing would ever be dis proven. and that is obviously not the case as shit is dis proven all the time meaning its not fact'

    only u wouldn't be able to understand that what i said here is what is accepted as 'scientific fact' later gets proven wrong by other 'scientific fact' even though facts are never wrong (take 1+1 for example)

  • science doesn't "prove" things ,mathematics proves things science gives us explanations and predictions based on its observations

    radiometric dating tells us how old the earth is, if you have a problem with the dating methods please explain why

    you still haven't shown me which part of your scripture tells us the world isn't 4.5 billion years old, feel free to keep dodging that one but it's doing nothing for your argument, chapter and verse please

  • im done here as you obviously want to side step, play dumb (or maybe not playing), or simple act as if i didnt say things, if you cant twist what i say or take it out of context

    this is my last post to you you fool

    ps funny how under your logic the same science that gives us clean water (which nature does too if humans didnt fuck it up) is the same one saying earth is billions of years old. i guess that cant be misinformation,disinformation or a stright lie, yup we r always told the truth

  • thats right, run away

    its always the same with you people, your laughable beliefs cannot stand up to even the slightest scrutiny, you have no ability to asses your beliefs critically and rationally, you just stick your fingers in your ears and pretend its not happening

    we know facts about the world that contradict your beliefs, when that happens the rational thing to do is to change your beliefs, not to try to change the facts

  • Comment removed

  • you ever think that maybe all that stuff about the universe being created billions of years ago and the earth millions of years ago, etc is a lie. can anyone prove right now that its true or do they haveto rely on 'faith' that the scientists that tell us this are right and not making shit up top get a nobel prize and there names in record books

    ps god doesn't make mistakes so god doesn't need to 'experiment'

  • so what did the birds do before its bones 'evolved' so its lighter for flight, get eaten? in that case how are there any birds left

  • so this guy never let him speak, is always cutting him when he manages to get one word in, and is always yelling and referring to childish name calling to the caller. i think the caller should have hung up on him as he doesn't know how to speak to people

  • soooo humans are not divine beings?

    .....monkeys go to heaven?

    hmmmmmm....

  • Evolution is contrary to the Bible. Even the Old Testament, which the Jewish people accept. Michael is right on a lot of things, but wrong on this.

  • id like to second that :)

  • The Creator exists outside of time as we know it.

    Mankinds first physics lesson is in the book of Genesis.

    Unfortunately there are many narrow minds on both sides of this issue.

  • Now you are worshipping scarecrows!? Your are an idiot!

  • Yep. There is one GOD and that is !THE MONEY!

  • @CaffeinatedThinking You are an ignoramus. If it is not in our genes it can't happen unless it is a defect, which is the opposite of darwins fantasy.

  • @CaffeinatedThinking There is nothing in our code for us to become another species. All we can produce is more people. You can pray to the pole smokers pope bitchard dawkins all you want an no frog will ever turn into a prince. Evilution is the day dream of a cabin boy who was no scientist and graduated from a Bible college.

  • Good point. Evilution has nothing to do with science. Evilution is a religion taught in schools. It should be banned ,as the religion it is, from the schools.

  • @CaffeinatedThinking NO. Once they cracked the DNA code the fantasy of evilution is impossible.

  • Human genome project has nothing to do with the truth of the bible. It is an attempt to fit evolutiontheory into the bible, but that is just another THEORY. It is totally disproved anyway

  • Michael Savage is WRONG on this matter. He is brainwashed himself.

    God is not mocked at. Michael Savage's view is in total conflict with the bible.

    Or you accept the bible is inerrant, or you make your own bible.

    The bible begins with GENESIS. Hard to accept the truth of genesis by Michael Savage.

  • @ewffaces7 Im pretty sure god didn't write the bible so that is irrelevant.

  • @CaffeinatedThinking I would rather listen to you bray your ignorance to the world, you superstitious lying wackjob.

  • @CaffeinatedThinking It is you who is talking nonsense. You lie. Evilution was disproved by the human genome project. You persist in your superstitious religious belief in the fantasy of evolution despite science disproving it . You anti-theists are pole smokers to the last.

  • @CaffeinatedThinking No doubt.

  • I thought God was the beginning and the end and already had a devine plan in motion and knows the future. So if he already knows the future why did he have to experiement with life to get it right? Shouldn't it have been right from the beginning? And humans are far from perfect, which should be painfully obvious by all your listeners and you shouting mumbo jumbo on your radio program everyday about all the idiots in the World.

  • Analyze the first few sentences, comparatively -- they don't add up to one logical statement. Ultimately this whole thing is a miracle.

  • good comment. Michael Savage has to redo this program. He tells a lie here.

  • I'm truly believe that in the next 50-100 years, evolution will be outmoded. No matter how hard these atheists insist, the origin of human life is still largely a mystery: they really don't have any idea. Evolution makes little sense since something can't evolve from nothing; we you go back to the "primordial soup", ask yourself this -- how did the damn soup get there? These atheists are clowns.

  • Comment removed

  • Evilution is the atheist religion's creation myth. People who believe in unicorns and evilution are not to be taken seriously. Evilution is a fairy tale. That is why you fairies love it so much.

  • Deuteronomy 33:17 KJV

    His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns

    Yep, belief in unicorns shouldnt be taken seriously...

  • @Cafeeine 17 In majesty he is like a firstborn bull; his horns are the horns of a wild ox. With them he will gore the nations, even those at the ends of the earth. Such are the ten thousands of Ephraim; such are the thousands of Manasseh."

    That is the true verse. NIV. You are talking out of your ass sodomite.

  • The NIV is an 11th hour attempt to wipe away some of the more egregious inconsistencies in your holy book. I only used the KJV for convenience, I was taught the Septuagint, which says:. (cont.)

  • @Cafeeine Why would someone compare something to something no one has ever seen. That explains nothing and is absurd on its face.

  • @Cafeeine You like satan accuse everyone. You try to twist and misquote to no avail. You and your pole smoking brethren will never make it.

  • All I've done is stated facts and my opinion of the NIV.

    You seem to be the only one accusing people and portraying the Christian character we all know and love.

  • @Cafeeine You are too ignorant of the facts for your opinions to have value. You twist the Bible to your uses. That you will pay a terrible price for. No one would try to explain anything by comparing it to something that no one has seen. They fixed a bad translation. Your jihadi buddies do the same. They have a fake bible they pass out because none of the translations are bad enough for them.

  • What is it that no one has ever seen Jerry? the Septuagint? Don't you know what that is? Please educate yourself.

  • @Cafeeine Unicorns. You are thick, even for one of the damned. I will explain what something is like by comparing it to a unicorn. That would really clear things up. No. You would compare it to something that people are familiar with like an ox.

  • An ox has two horns Jerry, while the unicorn only one.

    Educate yourself before you humiliate yourself any further

  • @Cafeeine The bull and the ox have 2 horns. I know that. Unicorn do not have any horns. You humiliated yourself by misquoting the Bible pole smoker. 17 His glory is like a firstborn bull, And his horns like the horns of the wild ox;  Together with them He shall push the peoples To the ends of the earth; They are the ten thousands of Ephraim, And they are the thousands of Manasseh.

  • Stop quoting the repaired bible Jerry. If you're going to play the literalist game, I expect you to quote either the Hebrew or the Greek.

    If you don't know Hebrew or Greek, you're a massive hypocrite.

    BTE this is my last reply to you today, as its been my birthday for the last 30 minutes and I'm feeling magnanimous.

  • @Cafeeine Ignorant homo. You don't get to tell others what to do. You are ignorant as you keep quoting from an archaic bible. Mouth off in person you pole smoking child molesting coward. Are you russian. You seem to ignorant and deluded to be from civilization.

  • @Cafeeine You misquoted the Bible and I corrected you. Stick to talking about something you understand like fellating Jews.

  • @Cafeeine You are an antitheist liar and hateful and one of the most ignorant pole smokers on YouTube. You are an even bigger liar then nononsesne.

  • πρωτότοκος ταύρου τὸ κάλλος αὐτοῦ κέρατα μονοκέρωτος τὰ κέρατα αὐτοῦ ἐν αὐτοῖς ἔθνη κερατιεῖ ἅμα ἕως ἐπ' ἄκρου γῆς αὗται μυριάδες Eφραιμ καὶ αὗται χιλιάδες *μαναςη

    If you're of a literalist bent, be serious about it.

  • @Cafeeine You went back to the oldest and among the worst translations. There are more then a dozen better ones. Typical homo, you have the book , but instead of putting it to good use, you twist it and misquote. Get the back to the bathouse pole smoker.

  • Don't give me that! If by 'better' you mean less incriminating, that's your damage.

    I'm a translator by trade, I know what updating a text requires, and the NIV's 'better' translation simply removed some of the more embarassing parts of your theology. If thats all it takes to be a Bible literalist, I can just write my own translation and be one.

  • @Cafeeine You are talking out of your ass and I called you on it you homo sexual child molester. There were no unicorns. No one would try to explain anything by comparing it to something that no one had ever seen. NKJV has it the same way as NIV.

  • Learn the history of your holy book. Not my fault if you're ignorant of it. And its not my fault that you don't know Greek either.

    Grow up and educate yourself. Insults only work if you're six.

  • @Cafeeine You are ignorant of the Bible and science. We know what is in the DNA. No kind of animal can become another. The only reason they made new translations was to improve on the older ones.

  • @Cafeeine You are just an ignorant fuck braying in the wilderness. Die and go to hell.

  • Totally agree with mike on this one. I've said the same thing years ago. You don't have to reject science like some retard hillbilly, but you dont have to reject god like some pompous asshole. Theirs being a christian who believes in God and morals, and then their are "Jesus freaks" who reject everything. They are an extreme, though not nearly as dangerous, that are just as ignorant as the muslims who believe that they will get X virgins if they kill for AHLALALAH. I'm a logical person of faith.

  • I support Savage, but he is dead wrong about this antibiblical nonsense.

  • I understand why Mike would be fearful of the Christian ignorant of Science.The Fact is most scientist who've done anything worth mention have been Christians.(if you dont believe me, do the research) Mike said,"God is evolution". But he is not a biblical scholar. He is a herbalist and dietitian.Don't get me wrong, I love Mike(long time listener) but his biblical scholarship in on training wheels. Beside lost time listeners know that Mike is always switching His view on God.

  • Completely agree with you, man. When you hear clips like this it makes you think Savage is, in fact, a false prophet (and I'm a big fan of the show). One the one hand, Savage constantly invokes his Jewishness to show he has moral authority; yet on the other hand, his approach to religion is pseudo at best.

    Good to listen to Savage from a conservative perspective, dangerous, at times, from a religious one.

  • Bullshit. Evilution is a religion.

  • Savage does not let the callers speak and continues to cut into the callers response while constantly asking question after question while never allowing time for the caller to explain. That is why, in spite of his frequently insightful comments he is not a serious nor honest broker of ideas. tj

  • Michael Savage has some solid points in many of his views, but his views on God and Creation are being tainted by his materialistic views as an ex-Communist. There is nothing in Genesis to suggest that God had failing models of man or any other creatures of Creation, that 7 days was a figurative representation for periods of millions of years.

    If someone has this particular view of the origin of the universe, they are not in line with Judeo/Christian teachings.

  • Hey, awesome clip! Thanks for posting! Can you please tell me what show this was from?

  • like three years ago

  • But can you give me the exact date so I can look it up?

  • here here!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more