From an imaging perspective, I am used to iterative algorithms increasing the computing time considerably. The speed at which your software can make these iterations is surprising.
Have any studies been conducted (Presage, etc.) comparing tumor conformity between this software to more traditional planning methods?
From an imaging perspective, I am used to iterative algorithms increasing the computing time considerably. The speed at which your software can make these iterations is surprising.
Have any studies been conducted (Presage, etc.) comparing tumor conformity between this software to more traditional planning methods?
ascott251 8 months ago