I'd go with Unreal Engine 3. Unreal is one of the games that actually made it into the history (the other being QUAKE, DooM and Half Life). Unreal Engine 3 also comes with UDK, which is a free tool for anyone to use and create outstanding visuals for free using the leading technology.
PC is a good gaming system but I go with consoles because I would rather buy one console that costs $400 instead of getting a good gaming pc for $900 and then upgrading it because games are becoming harder to run and you have to buy $100s of dollars worth of upgrades
Oh wow, Crytek is trying to fool PS3 owners this time. None of that was in game action. Cryengine2 looked just as good in the promo videos, but wasn't nearly as nice in-game.
Have you ever seen Crysis on 'Very High' Settings, there's no other game like it, Crytek's like the tall guy whos holding all the candy above everyone else's reach. They are the only software dev who can say without shame that their at the cutting edge
that and itl fucking lag and your computer will over heat and itl take 5 fucking hours to find a game with out a cheater... then you have to find a way to talk to people on it and you know get blue screen a few times... to much fucking hassel
I think the increased bit density gives you a little higher bit rate, but any mathematician can tell you that the storage capacity ratio between two discs increases with the square of the bit density, whereas read rate only increases linearly.
So, you're entirely right. Blu-Ray is much more bigger than it is faster, but it's certainly faster too.
on the contrary, its already been implemented on the 360, works fine except it need's a update for the UI interface. but the ps3 has had problems because of it's formatted blu-ray hd drive which seems to be giving the cryengine some tear and graphical issues.
the console version of the engine may have to be dumbed down due to the weaker gpus in the consoles. so the engine is prolly more scalable than the cryengine 2
THIS engine wouldn't, but definitely the REAL CryEngine 3.
Although, Unless Crytek make improvements over performance AND graphics, their new engine won't be ready until the next real line of graphics cards (rather than the recently released overclocked versions ie GTX295)
ps3 gpu is fine and the cell processor takes the brunt of the processing for physics ect and ps3 is 10x the power of a reg comp and game comps are only like 5x the power of a reg comp
game comps are FAR more powerful than the ps3. the cell (just like every other cpu) is supposed to do the brunt of the processing since ITS A PROCESSOR. the rsx is a gpu and its main job just like every other gpu is to process the graphix to put it on screen. the rsx is one of the main things thats bottlenecking the ps3. the rsx is based off of the nvidia 7800 or 7900 which is at least 3 generations behind in graphics tech.
KZ2 had to be checked and rechecked to make sure that lag wasnt going to happen not to mention they had to get rid of every thing that would make it lag. and it cant be compared to crysis because KZ2 was a linear game and crysis was sandbox style and linear games are easier to do.
The rsx does really need to get updated...to about an 8600 or at least an 8400 for the ps3, 360 im fine with, but the 7800 which is in the ps3 is REALLY holding it back. own both systems, and an xps m1530 custom, 10gigs of ram, 600mgb of hd space, 3 nvidia 8600gtx cards and i forgot the audio system i bought for it but w/e.
they cant update it now. its too late. if they were to do that then ps3 owners would be pissed. they would have to had done that back during the design phase. doing that now would be financial suicide to sony... UNLESS they allowed owners to trade in there ps3s for the upgraded ps3 with the new upgraded card for free but that still wouldnt happen.
which correct me if i am wrong is equal to 600 petabytes?
lol jkz :)
but seriously can u actually play any good games on the pc anymore... i mean crysis was good graphically but it was a pretty average game imo.
Also have fun updating that system of yours in about a month, and within a year your gonna have to shell out more money for dx11 games, all 2 of them.
Ive had the relatively same hardware in my pc for two years now (One GPU upgrade, that was it.) i bought a new monitor at christmas which is a BenQ E2200HD, it cost £120 and i can game at the same resolutions you console gamers would have to shell out thousands on a TV alone for. And all the BEST games are on the PC, on the 360 and PS3 all the game are full of pre pubescent retards with the intelligence of an amoeba.
i wasn't talking about multiplayer first person shooters, there are other games in the world that don't have a multiplayer aspect, things like metal gear solid 4, uncharted, fable II and games like that... games that aren't just about a competition, they are an experience.
how much did your system cost, i am pretty sure u could get a ps3 and a fullhd tv for the total cost of your system.
please list those best games of yours, to each is his own but i feel like my fellow gamer is missing out.
MGS4 does have multiplayer so you slipped up on that one. But my whole system cost about £800 all in. Full HD is only when an image is 1080p not 720p+ then upscaled which alot of TV's do, alot of 1080p standard TV's are £1000+. The whole Half Life series, is better on the PC, there's the vast amount of mods catering for all kinds of tastes and of course, theres the racing games, which simply cannot be matched on consoles. Gt Legends, the GTR series, RACE (the proper one.), LFS and rFactor.
I actually don't need an adapter, it has a HDMI port :>. But MGO really can't be considered a seperate part of the MGS series. I could say the same for you console guys when it comes to shooters. But driving games, PC cannot be beaten, you ever raced in a full grid of Le Mans on a proper simulator, using a G25? That is something that you just don't get on consoles.
yes shooters are in a similar state on consoles, but most of that games on pc are shooters, on consoles there is a much larger variety of genres that actually contain titles that one would want to play.
I am pretty sure i can use a g25 on granturismo 5(i know it isn't out yet, its a proper simulator though isn't it?) on lemans with a full grid, and i can do it splitscreen aswell, but not with a full grid though.
To be fair i'm tired of this, to each is his own, i am defeated...
Fair play, you can use a G25 on prologue, but prologue still isn't all that realistic physics wise contrary to popular belief and it also has a limit of 16 cars a full le man grid is over 60 :D
Looks absolutely awesome, Im hoping they actually decide to release Crysis for the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. Im sure it does look better on the PC but these are the best graphics seen on any console so far, Its just a case of a decent company actually buying the engine to build a game with, Now whos up for an awesome Jurassic Park game?
I'd go with Unreal Engine 3. Unreal is one of the games that actually made it into the history (the other being QUAKE, DooM and Half Life). Unreal Engine 3 also comes with UDK, which is a free tool for anyone to use and create outstanding visuals for free using the leading technology.
QUATR00 11 months ago
i recently bought an xbox360 for $400, bought a few games played it for like 2 weeks and then sold it and all my games on ebay.
What can I say? I'm just a PC-gaming boy =P
27kdon 1 year ago
PC is a good gaming system but I go with consoles because I would rather buy one console that costs $400 instead of getting a good gaming pc for $900 and then upgrading it because games are becoming harder to run and you have to buy $100s of dollars worth of upgrades
Verdeglenbro49 2 years ago
fucking gay the graphix prolly suck now cuz of 360 and ps3 fo consoles piece of shit
KakashiTheWorrier 2 years ago 3
yea said it, pc is the ultiamte gaming tool ;)
bigsnakedotcom 2 years ago 4
OK, then stop playing games with sucky graphics. I thought games were about gameplay as well though...Whatever.
djsotos 2 years ago 2
maybe thats because ps3 and xbox suck ass?
Hobbyegozentriker 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
go suck ass u ass sucking moron
marko94ever 2 years ago
maybe because your a impossible little dumbass prick that cant see worth shit?
redslownight 2 years ago
@Hobbyegozentriker Fanboys must post shitty comments, because without it they can not sleep.
psychonaut25 1 year ago
Oh wow, Crytek is trying to fool PS3 owners this time. None of that was in game action. Cryengine2 looked just as good in the promo videos, but wasn't nearly as nice in-game.
Dethred1 2 years ago
Have you ever seen Crysis on 'Very High' Settings, there's no other game like it, Crytek's like the tall guy whos holding all the candy above everyone else's reach. They are the only software dev who can say without shame that their at the cutting edge
Crixali17 2 years ago 9
This looks like a dumbed down version of CryEngine 2. Guess thats why its being made for consoles. lame :(
Supremist77 2 years ago
im glad someone els noticed
360flipjames 2 years ago
I want that song, annywone knows ho it is? were to get it and so on?
MatsNorway 2 years ago
0:33 - 0:38 omg thats looks actually real.
woohoomoh 2 years ago
looks the same...
esspytood 2 years ago
This is footage recorded from PS3 and XBOX360.
It'll probably look MUCH better on a decent gaming rig ;)
boebi555 2 years ago 2
that and itl fucking lag and your computer will over heat and itl take 5 fucking hours to find a game with out a cheater... then you have to find a way to talk to people on it and you know get blue screen a few times... to much fucking hassel
sod16 2 years ago
I think your all negating to realise this is actually a console port of the cryengine! Cryengine 3 is thus far a console only engine!
roars25 2 years ago
Yeah, the new CryEngine 3 is multiplayer only.
cyborgtroy 2 years ago
no its not, they can do what they want with it, there is no "only" setting besides its easier to run a single player then multiplayer
sod16 2 years ago
lol no I was joking at that guy who complained that PC gamers cheated more and it made multiplayer impossible because of all the cheaters.
cyborgtroy 2 years ago
beautiful, tobad no one makes good games whit it :(
superford500 2 years ago
may be the license is too high priced
raterito 2 years ago
looks like unreal engine plus dunia... crytek 2 for me is much more demanding,
slaveknight 2 years ago
how can 360 games be HD when the games are on dvd??????
akvalues 2 years ago
Because the output graphics are HD resolution. You just failed for trying to compare DVD Movies with Games pressed on DVD Discs.
Paceydre 2 years ago 3
The reason movies are on blu-ray/hd-dvd discs is simply because they support increased file size, so they can put more quality on it.
You can also put a HD movie on a dvd, problem is that it'll be limited to 20 minutes or so.
boebi555 2 years ago
I think the increased bit density gives you a little higher bit rate, but any mathematician can tell you that the storage capacity ratio between two discs increases with the square of the bit density, whereas read rate only increases linearly.
So, you're entirely right. Blu-Ray is much more bigger than it is faster, but it's certainly faster too.
cyborgtroy 2 years ago
This would b a realy sick engine for a call of duty game!!!!!!!!
starpink141 2 years ago
this enigine looks awesome...but the quentom 3 engine design by high voltage is amazing...becuase they make 360 grahical effects with the wii
NintendoKingdom 2 years ago
no way it will work on the 360 lol
thepeacebeast 2 years ago
seriously...
hmoob7 2 years ago
that was whar tour mom said lol
wickedroy 2 years ago
on the contrary, its already been implemented on the 360, works fine except it need's a update for the UI interface. but the ps3 has had problems because of it's formatted blu-ray hd drive which seems to be giving the cryengine some tear and graphical issues.
luger74 2 years ago
I think they just need to bump up their Physics engine.
cabose34521 2 years ago
eh looks cool but now will just make people bitch about graphics even more, idk if this is a good thing or a bad thing
sadisticwolverine 2 years ago
the console version of the engine may have to be dumbed down due to the weaker gpus in the consoles. so the engine is prolly more scalable than the cryengine 2
feczor 2 years ago
This shouldn't be for PC. It looks too dumbed-down. CryEngine 2 looks better than this.
The only impressive thing it has is nice looking forests.
The real name of the engine should go along the lines of "CryEngine Console edition" or something.
junkfoodman607 2 years ago
I Think The engine will look MUCH better on Pc ;)
Crysis4Ever123 2 years ago
THIS engine wouldn't, but definitely the REAL CryEngine 3.
Although, Unless Crytek make improvements over performance AND graphics, their new engine won't be ready until the next real line of graphics cards (rather than the recently released overclocked versions ie GTX295)
junkfoodman607 2 years ago
if that should really work on a 360 i´d be happy - but i hope the pc version is gonna kick ass a lot more since i´ve got a high end pc
pissfotz 2 years ago
So is this like a console version of Cryengine 2?
Ultraminiman 2 years ago
No, it will have many improvments ;)
Crysis4Ever123 2 years ago
My computer just shit on itself watching that.
volimcevape 2 years ago
Crytek >>> All
PedroGuardiao 2 years ago
NIIICE!
klassikaren 2 years ago
omgomg!!!!
FINALY REAL GRAPHICS ON CONSOLES!! WAAAAAAAAW
KILLERWSYAN 2 years ago
OMG! 3 already =o holy crao, nice
iluvwiki 2 years ago
Unreal still the best so hahahaha!
digitalweapon 3 years ago
Not quite, really depends on what a developer will want to do. Cryengine is making some huge leaps and bound over Unreal, they both have their perks.
Shiftfallout 2 years ago
may be a farcry and crysis sequal for Xbox & Ps3 only
phillkillv3 3 years ago
Now that this is announced, i would really like to see Crysis on the Ps3 (or 360)
poeity 3 years ago
really i thought the game was pretty average
adityagoyal 2 years ago
eita nozes
lukinhasbu 3 years ago
Just so you know, Crysis will never come to consoles, just the cryengine 3, It'll be a different game^^
p4h4lis 3 years ago
its could go on ps3 easily
hbkfitz 3 years ago
no it wouldnt. ps3 gpu is too weak.
feczor 2 years ago
ps3 gpu is fine and the cell processor takes the brunt of the processing for physics ect and ps3 is 10x the power of a reg comp and game comps are only like 5x the power of a reg comp
hbkfitz 2 years ago
game comps are FAR more powerful than the ps3. the cell (just like every other cpu) is supposed to do the brunt of the processing since ITS A PROCESSOR. the rsx is a gpu and its main job just like every other gpu is to process the graphix to put it on screen. the rsx is one of the main things thats bottlenecking the ps3. the rsx is based off of the nvidia 7800 or 7900 which is at least 3 generations behind in graphics tech.
feczor 2 years ago
bottleneck is bull the mem and graphics mem are at 3.2ghz and the cell takes most of the load hence killzone 2 and god of war 3 graphical power
hbkfitz 2 years ago
KZ2 had to be checked and rechecked to make sure that lag wasnt going to happen not to mention they had to get rid of every thing that would make it lag. and it cant be compared to crysis because KZ2 was a linear game and crysis was sandbox style and linear games are easier to do.
feczor 2 years ago
The rsx does really need to get updated...to about an 8600 or at least an 8400 for the ps3, 360 im fine with, but the 7800 which is in the ps3 is REALLY holding it back. own both systems, and an xps m1530 custom, 10gigs of ram, 600mgb of hd space, 3 nvidia 8600gtx cards and i forgot the audio system i bought for it but w/e.
luger74 2 years ago
they cant update it now. its too late. if they were to do that then ps3 owners would be pissed. they would have to had done that back during the design phase. doing that now would be financial suicide to sony... UNLESS they allowed owners to trade in there ps3s for the upgraded ps3 with the new upgraded card for free but that still wouldnt happen.
feczor 2 years ago
wtf is 600mgb
is that mega giga byte
which correct me if i am wrong is equal to 600 petabytes?
lol jkz :)
but seriously can u actually play any good games on the pc anymore... i mean crysis was good graphically but it was a pretty average game imo.
Also have fun updating that system of yours in about a month, and within a year your gonna have to shell out more money for dx11 games, all 2 of them.
adityagoyal 2 years ago
Ive had the relatively same hardware in my pc for two years now (One GPU upgrade, that was it.) i bought a new monitor at christmas which is a BenQ E2200HD, it cost £120 and i can game at the same resolutions you console gamers would have to shell out thousands on a TV alone for. And all the BEST games are on the PC, on the 360 and PS3 all the game are full of pre pubescent retards with the intelligence of an amoeba.
MrORLY 2 years ago
i wasn't talking about multiplayer first person shooters, there are other games in the world that don't have a multiplayer aspect, things like metal gear solid 4, uncharted, fable II and games like that... games that aren't just about a competition, they are an experience.
how much did your system cost, i am pretty sure u could get a ps3 and a fullhd tv for the total cost of your system.
please list those best games of yours, to each is his own but i feel like my fellow gamer is missing out.
adityagoyal 2 years ago
MGS4 does have multiplayer so you slipped up on that one. But my whole system cost about £800 all in. Full HD is only when an image is 1080p not 720p+ then upscaled which alot of TV's do, alot of 1080p standard TV's are £1000+. The whole Half Life series, is better on the PC, there's the vast amount of mods catering for all kinds of tastes and of course, theres the racing games, which simply cannot be matched on consoles. Gt Legends, the GTR series, RACE (the proper one.), LFS and rFactor.
MrORLY 2 years ago
why can't racing games be matched on consoles? Can you play via splitscreen on pc?
Also about mgs4, i should say that the single player game totally eclipses the online component.
I concur that the modding community is really great on pc, and for shooters the keyboard and mouse cannot be beaten.
But don't you ever get tired of playing slightly updated versions of shooters over and over again?
Also you can use the same benq screen for gaming via a ps3 aswell, all you need is an adapter.
adityagoyal 2 years ago
I actually don't need an adapter, it has a HDMI port :>. But MGO really can't be considered a seperate part of the MGS series. I could say the same for you console guys when it comes to shooters. But driving games, PC cannot be beaten, you ever raced in a full grid of Le Mans on a proper simulator, using a G25? That is something that you just don't get on consoles.
MrORLY 2 years ago
yes shooters are in a similar state on consoles, but most of that games on pc are shooters, on consoles there is a much larger variety of genres that actually contain titles that one would want to play.
I am pretty sure i can use a g25 on granturismo 5(i know it isn't out yet, its a proper simulator though isn't it?) on lemans with a full grid, and i can do it splitscreen aswell, but not with a full grid though.
To be fair i'm tired of this, to each is his own, i am defeated...
adityagoyal 2 years ago
Fair play, you can use a G25 on prologue, but prologue still isn't all that realistic physics wise contrary to popular belief and it also has a limit of 16 cars a full le man grid is over 60 :D
MrORLY 2 years ago
awh fail... :(
adityagoyal 2 years ago
MGS4's online is not for simple people.
akvalues 2 years ago
enlighten me...
adityagoyal 2 years ago
0:38 <3 HAWT!
NicolaiResch 3 years ago
Multiplatform. That should press down the requirements
Zeboath 3 years ago
.... I wish Cryengine 3 actually looked as good as Cryengine 2. Well at least it's probably waaaay better optimized.
hnimisawesome 3 years ago
Better Lighting Better Graphics Better Physics Better Anti Aliasing Might be X10 and yes more optimized shaders
phillkillv3 3 years ago
The good news is that this will run on xbox360 and ps3 :D
Anciegher 3 years ago
lmao wich one you got
hbkfitz 3 years ago
Looks absolutely awesome, Im hoping they actually decide to release Crysis for the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. Im sure it does look better on the PC but these are the best graphics seen on any console so far, Its just a case of a decent company actually buying the engine to build a game with, Now whos up for an awesome Jurassic Park game?
Greyham721 3 years ago
Wow! The graphics and physics are so realistic. Its amazing how far we've come in video games since pong! lol!
Stellerman7 3 years ago 4
Saaaweet!
XRayXI 3 years ago
wtf? ce3 ftw
Liamscott92 3 years ago 2