Interview with Animal Rights Granarchist Joan Court

[AranSPEAKS]

@animalabuserssuck666 LOL

[natija08]

Very good video.

Thanks for uploading.

[ednakano1]

"Animal right" is supporting ALF/ELF type eco-terrorism. They do not care human life to save animal.

[incaayoub]

@ednakano1 Really? How many humans were harmed by the ALF? and how many humans AND animals were harmed by governments condemning ALF ?

[ednakano1]

@incaayoub

AFL intend to kill human but just hey failed.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 No ALF guidelines state not to harm any human or animal. An ALF member is defined as someone that follows ALF guidelines, so you are talking rubbish!

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

GuideLine? ALF/ELF SSCS are liar and no control.

Your opinoin is to radicurous.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 You clearly have no idea what you are talking about! The ALF is not a group, it is a movement the only way for someone to join the ALF movement is by following the guidelines. There is no one to lie, it is leaderless – it is a set of guidelines and people that choose to follow them. You need to do some research.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

ALF /ELF learned concept from IRA. It is way of guerrilla or terrorism.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 Wrong again. The IRA is an actual group with leadership, go do some research you are looking like a total fool!

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

You support terrosit who use bomb and kill many citizen.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 You really are an idiot aren't you? I was hoping you would do some research but you seem unable to do so. The ALF has never killed anyone.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

IAFL just fail to kill peoplebut they have will to kill people. It is Enough.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 No I just explained to you how that cannot be the case, you really have very poor

comprehension skills.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

As Nazi did. Animal Right will make human right lower and finallybecome racism.

It was already proved by history.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 Now you are really sounding stupid, the Nazis had animal welfare laws, as do most western countries now, not animal rights laws. Everything you have said so far has been false.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

It Just means many counties (mainly Euro and their colonies) tried to return racism counties.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 Now your words don't even make sense! Please get someone with basis English skills to help you post.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 @ednakano1 Now your words don't even make sense! Please get someone with basis English skills to help you post.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

Many native English speaker racist always point out shortage of English skill when he/she cannot win debate. 

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 I am brown skined and no racist. I simply could not understand your last comment at all, it made no sense

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

I didnot mention you are white. Why you think you are not racist because of colored.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 I am not racist for the last time, I actually spend time doing anti-racist actions. It is just that the following: "It Just means many counties (mainly Euro and their colonies) tried to return racism counties." doesn't actually mean anything.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

It means racist do not realize what is racism.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 Not understanding you is not racist. If you say something that makes no sense in English and I can't understand what you mean – what am I ment to do? just pretend I know what you are saying?

[ednakano1]

2002: Watson tells Animal Rights 2002 Conference in Washington DC that if a person dies from one of his actions, he would consider it “collateral damage”. He believes it is not possible to:

“commit violence against non-sentient objects. Property damage is not violence.”

this means Paul Watson and SSCS are not afraid "collateral damage" to kill human life when they made "non-violence" propaty attack like ship.

If SSCs respect human life, Adi Gil should not stay in front of big vessel.

[ednakano1]

"Animal rights" supports eco-terrolism and Hypocrisy.

[ednakano1]

3. "whaling captain refused help from SSCS to help find one of his crew"

If you are lost your wallet, You want to ask mugger to help?

SSCS also notice as soon as finding Japanese crew, SSCS would attack whaling feet.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 “SSCS also notice as soon as finding Japanese crew, SSCS would attack whaling feet” That comment says it all. The whalers care more about committing violence against the whales than saving a human life – that is exactly my point is if you disrespect animals, you disrespect human life as well. 

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

You anre not right. I rise same question 2If you are lost your wallet, You want to ask mugger to help?"

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 False analogy. Firstly, typical of a supporter of animal abuse you equate a wallet (an item of property) with a life. Secondly you would not accept help from a mugger because they would keep the wallet, the equivalent in a human life situation would be a murderer – SSCS has never killed anyone.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

I means why we need to trust words of liar or who have who has malice to attack.

Hiostorically SSCS has not enough credit. As for no understanding of you of the metaphor, you are only stupid.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 No it is because it is a false analogy – it is logically unsound. Clearly SSCS is not going to kill people. There could be no harm to the crew member from SSCS looking for the crew member. The reason for refusing is because the whalers care more about their property and profits than the lives of their own crew. This is typical of animal abusers.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

You are logically incoprrect.

I said people except SSCS and supporters cannot believe what SSCS said.

At least Japanease never ever trust SSCS.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 They don't have to trust SSCS to accept help to find a crew member. Clearly they have no regard for life.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

I said SSCS may disturb serch of crew even if they said help.

what a fool !

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 If they wanted to disrupt the search they could, they wouldn't need permission. Clearly they wanted to help, clearly it is you who is the fool or maybe just desperately trying to mislead.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

SSCS is liar. SSCS never be trusted by Japanease.

It is enough reason to refuse SSCS's fake help offering.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 You are just repeating yourself now, your excuses fool no one. Animal rights and human rights go hand in hand.

[ednakano1]

1.I'm sorry for my miss type. it is ALF who agressive animal rights prople and on of conservation organization FBI listed as terrorist among with SSCS.

2. "Japans whaling program as criminal activity" is lie. If so one gorverment should take action but actually only Australia is doing it and other western countries like USA or New Zealand mentioned Australia will lose. Even if Australia Gorverment know they will lose.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 1.No SSCS is not a US terrorist group or they would not be able to have offices in the USA. Clearly the USA don't see them as terrorist or they would be in jail. I know here in the UK they are a registered charity.

2.The fact other countries refuse to act does not mean they view your activity as legal, all respected scientists say you are not doing research.

[ednakano1]

@AranSPEAKS

Ask FBI. Theu liste SSCS as terrolist t o be observed.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 The FBI may observe SSCS – they observe all sorts of people. US police infiltrate peace groups. But they are not considered terrorists, if they were they would be in jail, they are not.

[ednakano1]

FBI listed SSCS or GP as terrolist next to Al qualda.

I'M sorry for my misstype for ALF.

ALF is agressive "Animal Right" organization.

SHAC is attachking private company legally doing businss.

When you lost your wallet, You ask a robber

[ednakano1]

Animal right support terrolism like AFL or SSCS. They love violence yo human. 

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 What is AFL? SSCS is not seen as 'terrorist' by anyone but Japan. The whole developed world see Japans whaling program as criminal activity – not just animal rights people. Most people I know support SSCS even the ones that are not animal rights people. One whaling captain cared so little about humans that he refused help from SSCS to help find one of his crew lost as sea – disrespect for animals lead to disrespect for humans.

[ednakano1]

People who talk about animal right forget human right.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 Try saying that to Joan! Joan spent her working life in child protection, she was a midwife, she worked with the poor in India (she followed Gandhi) and she cares so much about people. Actually it is completely the opposite those that criticise animal rights activists tend to be doing nothing for human rights themselves. Violence towards animals is linked to violence towards humans.

[ednakano1]

They are hypocrites. They are pressing own subjectivity against the animal. Actually, they are try to show themselves as the good man.

[AranSPEAKS]

@ednakano1 Your comment makes no sense at all. Please get someone who can write clear English to help you post your comment as I can see you are critical but cannot ascertain why.

[quicksilver3x3]

She's a wonderful soul...thanks for doing this, even though it was hard to hear and see. I've always said that it's not about rating the victims, it's about the human behavior. Humans only degrade themselves when they exploit/mistreat/kill animals. Animals are absolutely wonderful and should be respected and loved by us.

[AranSPEAKS]

@quicksilver3x3 Glad you like it.