Red Ice Radio - Paul A. LaViolette - Pt 1 - Earth Under Fire

[wookiesack]

flooded the earth though. all coastal areas flooded. fact. not opinion.

[wookiesack]

poooop. I love ancient alien theory. But there is no evidence. I look into everything. The arc story is real. Thats proven there was a flood after the last iceage during human times. Its been proven by real scientist....It had nothing to do with the sun..just the natural heating and cooling of the earth. The wave was made at the great lakes area by a huge megalake being held back by glaciers.. I have no idea what he thinks is new or original. Coronal mass ejections?wtf.dude. no bearing on heat.

[wookiesack]

This guy preaches to wierdos with pseudoscience. Its so gay. What a tool. He takes advantage of the lesser minded people with fake science! Real scientists dont agree because it is not using facts, but rather opinions. He applys his bachelors degree to making up really nice names for theories and repeating others real work mixed with poopscience he created. Please dont beleive this guy. He is such a joke.

[islandbuoy4]

In Earth Under Fire on page 20, the renegade Paul makes a big mistake in his associations re: the Lion, the Bull, the Man, and the Eagle to the 4 Evangelists.

And considering much of his work is in regards to these 4 zodiacal signs and the narrative they suggest in regards to Solomon's Temple, etc, I want to suggest Earth Under Fire needs to be judged accordingly.

You can't get the groundwork wrong and build on it.

[420protoman]

may 20-25, 2012, zenith cosmology over chichen itza. alignment with galactic anticenter. may 20 also has annular eclipse...

[parousia555]

Starburst is also a candy, and those who have eaten it have been shaken without understanding the gravity of their actions?

[rcacad]

I love the concept and effort and nature behind revealing the mysteries of the expirence were having by way of science but going on and on and on with infinate theories about the holigram of reality is neat but is not focused on using the principals of science to overcome humanistic shortcomings. I mean science can describe the entire universe and theorize about mulitiple universes but what does a starving fellow human being care about science that is not focused on humanity 1st and foremost?

[newbetterandhappy]

Break away glaciers is the first plausible great flood explanation I've heard. There is no way there could have been enough water to cover the whole earth, without huge amounts of evidence.

[rcacad]

It didnt realize how nerdy and monotone LaViolette was......dont remember him being so mechanistic.

[uroprop]

great guests you get on but plz make playlists

[edward892]

The Galaxy is waving us goodbye.

[FromDimmuLand]

I saw this man on an Project Camelot interview talking about galactic superwaves.

[rcacad]

@FromDimmuLand More people need to listen to Dr LaViolette, his is one of those rediculous scientist doing wierd science freekin majic stuff (DR Greer would say), and has a good message with alot of his approach.....He mentioned in his Project Camelot interview that he and his team proved the standard Newtonian model was false and that it was only 1/2 of the equasion and the universe was really a "flux" and not linear,..y jaw dropped and i shook my head at the whole interview. N Haramein too.

[FromDimmuLand]

@rcacad Yes, and what pleases me, is that even 'official' mainstream science is even speaking up against the Huge Bang theory too..

In india they are working on proof of Multiverses.. :D I hope that one pans out ! LOL

[rcacad]

@FromDimmuLand They can prove all the multiverses they want, Gregg Braden and Depac Chopra would say, once you start proving the infinate and the principals behind it that somhow the concencious observer is going to see somthing....Sort of like the universe provides somthing anywhere any time for those who seek to understand and reveal its nature. Multiverses are ok but how is it more specifically revelent to problems that the world has that science can tackle rather than endless theorys of it?