Saab 9-5 Aero 05 orginal 270 hp Vs 9-3 ss 300 hk MapTun steg 6

[HvPman]

Strange, I always thought that an original (stock) 2.3 Aero turns out 250 hp.

[rarelibra]

You had a Maptun stage VI and got beat by a stock 9-5?

[Scaramanga76]

Ni suger ju kuk!

[reactcirca]

What % tint is on the 9-3 ss door window you look at the 9-5 through. ITS FUCKIN ILL please tell me no lower than 32% rofl. thats legal where i live.. my 97 900se has a tint but i want it darker lol

[Jsteri]

This can't be right... I have on my OG 9-3 Maptun stage 5 kit and it produces 315hp/420nm of torgue. New generation 9-3+stage 6= only 300hp?

[spinacznyc]

2.3 > 2.8 :D

[heat4zone]

Oscars  lilla b bil haha

[docjones1979]

nice rims on that 9-5!

[dan2e2]

Are these power outputs correct?

As a stage1 9-3 Aero SS (around 250bhp) is quicker than a standard 9-5 Aero (250bhp).

A 300hp 9-3 would rip a standard 9-5 aero apart... unless the figures are incorrect.

[XSAABAero]

@dan2e2 standard 9-5 Aero is quicker than standard 9-3 2.8 v6 Aero

[dan2e2]

@XSAABAero Very, very little in it between the 2.8 9-3 and 2.3 9-5 in standard guise

My comparison was a Stage 1 "2.0" Aero, which is a fair amount lighter than the 9-5 and puts out the same torque / power in Stage 1 form... giving a slight advantage.

A 300bhp 9-3 2.0 Aero SS should really be pulling away from a standard 9-5 Aero (250~ bhp) with relative ease - I don't think the numbers and performance of the cars in the video really stacks up. For one the 9-5 Aero has never been 270 standard

[XSAABAero]

@dan2e2 A 9-5 Aero will be slower from 0 to 100 but after H engine is faster!!

[maikeru01]

I have a '04 9-3 aero myself. 6 speed, 210 hp, i think. great car but you gotta respect the 9-5. (>_<)

[rkjer]

2005 9-5 does not have 270 hp stock. its 250

[qweraeroV6]

Hat the modes of 9-5 and that the tuning of a 9-3SS?