Great video. Watch the Dimitri Khalezov documentary interview on my channel to learn how the WTC buildings wree demolished using an underground nuclear demolition -- nuclear is the only technology that had enough power to turn over 2,000 feet of concrete and steel to microscopic dust.
Las torres gemelas fueron demolidas en una demolicion disque controlada porque alrededor de las torres gemelas , segundos antes de que se cayeran se ven flashasos y en el pentagono se estrello un misil
You all **DO* realize the King Dome didn't have a basement but the WTC towers had at least 6 basement levels - including a train station (you know where your "missing" rubble was, check the NYC train schedule for Sept 12. You're also comparing the dust cloud of a -10 story building vs that of a 110-story building. I've looked around but I've never seen a controlled demolition of a 110-story building but I would think it would collapse different than a stadium. Gimme a break!
Just how did two 110 story buildings, plus a 47 story building instantaneously transform into dust and fall straight down into their own foot prints in the first place?
No one with a brain buys the glib media's pancaking story.
I agree with you. Additionally, the KingDome was almost entirely an empty shell. In fact the outer perimeter of the Kingdome contained the vast majority of materials and has can be seen in your picture the height of materials is almost the same as the central section. So what happened to all the material there?
It is obvious that 9/11 was an inside job, and that this video's is accurate regarding the "~12%" in general. But, the question I have is this: Could the deep foundation of WTC 1&2 have contributed to less than ~12% of street level rubble? If I am not mistaken there was parking and other facilities located in the foundation.
The only possible flaw I see in this presentation is that the 3.2-story height of the rubble pile would have to be measured from somewhere near the bottom of the sub-levels, rather than street level. Granted, the talc-sized dust created by the event is a major quandry, though.
It seems to me that tactical nuks would've left signs of fusing or glassification here and there, instead of just pulverization, so who knows what technique was used to actually bring them down. It was NOT jet planes.
@ChilesGreen As Dr Judy Wood noted, if there was molten steel in that debris, workers could not be working above it, and machines could not be digging down into it. Workers were going into the basements at the time the USGS said there was molten steel in there.
If it was so hot, why did the steel file cabinet disintegrate (along with the 47 massive box core columns) and all of their paper contents rain down unburnt?
Why it turned to dust? Maybe this information can satisfy someone: WTC nuclear demolition. Search for Dimitri Khalezov and his 26-part video on Google or contact me. I can give downloadlinks with all necassary information. And do not misinerprate the term "nuclear demolition". Because the towers were brought down by the "secondary effect" of a thermonuclear explosion deep underground which is very unknown to almost everybody. Watch it open minded till the end. Nothing in common with mini nukes.
No conventional explosive can turn that much concrete into a 1 inch dust carpet covering lower Manhattan, and certainly not gravity alone. It's absolutely laughable.
Yeah, right there in the video - you can see the towers going back and to the left... back and to the left. And then... then clearly the people INSIDE set the fires and then shot themselves in the back of their heads. And all before the Bradley Tanks could could get in to save the children.
Whoever pinched Timmy McVey's truck plates that morning should get the Medal of Honor. Those darned A-rabbi Terists.
...it comes to right now. You have the choice - between Love or Fear. - Bill Hicks
you notice the video talks nothing of the basement parking floors under the towers? they became landfill you think maybe david blane waved a wand over the rest is he behind all this?? your fuckers need to go outside a rent a hooker
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"What on Earth happened to the Twin Towers on 9/11?".
Two aircraft were deliberately flown into them - that's what happened.
As for the crap about 12 per cent of the structure and clouds of dust etc, how many experiments with aircraft impacts on super-sized skyscrapers have been conducted to allow us to arrive at that conclusion? Mathematical models are one thing; what happens in real life is quite another.
Why did the BBC announce the collapse of building 7, 30 min prior to its actual collapse? Why is it OK to accuse the MOOOSLIMs of doing 911, but it's racist to mention anything about SilverStein or the 5 Dancing Israelis?
1) "Why did the BBC announce the collapse of building 7, 30 min prior to its actual collapse?".
Because they either received incorrect informtion or misconstrued it. I don't know why so much fuss is made about this, because it doesn't prove a thing;
2) "Why is it Ok to accuse the MOOOSLIMS' of doing 9/11?".
Typical snarky smart @ss answers one expects from the controlled media. And we're also to believe "thermal expansion and collision damage" caused building 7 to suddenly implode into powder.
I feel for the 50thousand + people smothered in the asbestos cloud and for the environment, because those trade towers are still blowing their remains all over usa iff you think about it, so that one event will potentially kill much more than 3thousand poor lives.
I have a link to a petition on my profile to open up a new investigation into 911, you have the option of remaining anonymous. I have seen many signatures from around the world.
Don't listen to CNN911Fakes, what he is doing is giving disinformation to discredit the whole 9/11 truth movement!! This cointelpro agent should be exposed.
The (gama rays and fireball) could easily be contained in the bedrock under the base and interior of these buildings, which were instantly pulverized, leaving the undamaged tops to fall through powdered plasma.
Only a nuke can instantly transform 500,000 tons of steel and concrete into dust.
Oh by the way, people in the vicinity of the collapsing Trade Centers are dying of cancers.
If Islamic extremists were capable of violating not only the 2nd law of thermodynamics, but also the law of conservation of momentum, then we really would have a MAJOR problem on our hands. The government's explanation of 9/11 is "politics, bracketed by science". Truthers are just asking questions, and the government and media, hand in hand, are refusing to answer.
This is what needs to be discussed.. No one seems to care to answer how fire causes these gargantuan towers to evaporate. What can hood-wink so many people to not even care anymore? I don't care anymore like most of everyone else who knows that nothing will ever come of this event. No further investigations , no lawsuits, nothing but small bands of "truthers" seeking a cause with which to unite around to give their lives meaning. And yet, In the great scheme of things, nothing ever changes.
A very existentialist but accurate portrayal of the situation. One hopeful observation, if I may, is that the scale of this PSYOP event is unprecedented. They may have miscalculated. There is still hope to awaken as many as possible to this and effect some time of change. Let's don't quit.
I for one was all for this change, from what I studied in engineering I knew that there was more to this demolishing than mere jet fuel which evaporated for the most part on impact. Ahhhhh, it's just to much to rehash all over again. And like you wrote, the only thing we have is the hope of someone finding the missing links to tie it all together. The conspiracy is the B.S. our gov't wants us to believe not what's being written by us "truthers"
Nuked.
sv3rige 5 months ago
Great video. Watch the Dimitri Khalezov documentary interview on my channel to learn how the WTC buildings wree demolished using an underground nuclear demolition -- nuclear is the only technology that had enough power to turn over 2,000 feet of concrete and steel to microscopic dust.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
The towers had six sub levels so add 6 stories.
drbob645 7 months ago 2
Oh no! Anthony Lawson :( soo fucking annoying!
ChristianHolloway7 7 months ago
The Towers were cremated and buried at sea.
1971SuperLead 11 months ago
Las torres gemelas fueron demolidas en una demolicion disque controlada porque alrededor de las torres gemelas , segundos antes de que se cayeran se ven flashasos y en el pentagono se estrello un misil
Legowtc911 1 year ago
Aunque yo soy mexicano yo tengo conciensiencia sobre la gente que murio el 11 de septiembre y tambien estoy en busca de la verda
Legowtc911 1 year ago
You all **DO* realize the King Dome didn't have a basement but the WTC towers had at least 6 basement levels - including a train station (you know where your "missing" rubble was, check the NYC train schedule for Sept 12. You're also comparing the dust cloud of a -10 story building vs that of a 110-story building. I've looked around but I've never seen a controlled demolition of a 110-story building but I would think it would collapse different than a stadium. Gimme a break!
BellaCroix 1 year ago
@BellaCroix
Just how did two 110 story buildings, plus a 47 story building instantaneously transform into dust and fall straight down into their own foot prints in the first place?
No one with a brain buys the glib media's pancaking story.
ChilesGreen 1 year ago
@BellaCroix
I agree with you. Additionally, the KingDome was almost entirely an empty shell. In fact the outer perimeter of the Kingdome contained the vast majority of materials and has can be seen in your picture the height of materials is almost the same as the central section. So what happened to all the material there?
You cannot use a blanket statement of 12%.
blakedhoffman 1 year ago
@blakedhoffman
Look at the inside of the King Dome after they prepped it for demolition /watch?v=zJpJaBEP9Ak
There isn't much around the perimeter. The photo at 0:17 of this video shows the center of the dome was significantly lower.
What do you estimate the height of the debris pile should have been for the Twin Towers with all the other buildings to contain it?
Where are the steel core columns? They were box section, not I-beam, and there should've been over one-hundred thousand feet of it.
lughcious 1 year ago
check out "barometric bombs"
cancanbiker 1 year ago
It is obvious that 9/11 was an inside job, and that this video's is accurate regarding the "~12%" in general. But, the question I have is this: Could the deep foundation of WTC 1&2 have contributed to less than ~12% of street level rubble? If I am not mistaken there was parking and other facilities located in the foundation.
biped19 1 year ago
The only possible flaw I see in this presentation is that the 3.2-story height of the rubble pile would have to be measured from somewhere near the bottom of the sub-levels, rather than street level. Granted, the talc-sized dust created by the event is a major quandry, though.
It seems to me that tactical nuks would've left signs of fusing or glassification here and there, instead of just pulverization, so who knows what technique was used to actually bring them down. It was NOT jet planes.
bluesojourn 1 year ago
@bluesojourn
All the tell tail evidence of nuclear demolition was quickly disposed. They couldn't hide the pools of molten steal.
ChilesGreen 1 year ago
@ChilesGreen As Dr Judy Wood noted, if there was molten steel in that debris, workers could not be working above it, and machines could not be digging down into it. Workers were going into the basements at the time the USGS said there was molten steel in there.
If it was so hot, why did the steel file cabinet disintegrate (along with the 47 massive box core columns) and all of their paper contents rain down unburnt?
"nuclear demolition" was not involved.
Top down disintegration into dust.
lughcious 1 year ago
@lughcious "Top down disintegration into dust."
TOP DOWN DISINTEGRATION INTO DUST!!!!!
Interesting how clear of a day this happened on. Star Wars weapons need clear days to shoot their Death Rays?
1971SuperLead 11 months ago
Why it turned to dust? Maybe this information can satisfy someone: WTC nuclear demolition. Search for Dimitri Khalezov and his 26-part video on Google or contact me. I can give downloadlinks with all necassary information. And do not misinerprate the term "nuclear demolition". Because the towers were brought down by the "secondary effect" of a thermonuclear explosion deep underground which is very unknown to almost everybody. Watch it open minded till the end. Nothing in common with mini nukes.
buschrapper 1 year ago
Is the narrator that Dyson vacuum cleaner guy you see on the commercials?
squat625 1 year ago
dr judy wood
Directed energy weapon used. hutchison effect.
DSCW33 1 year ago
No conventional explosive can turn that much concrete into a 1 inch dust carpet covering lower Manhattan, and certainly not gravity alone. It's absolutely laughable.
ricorreze 1 year ago
fire+anything+dust
MrShimonhe 1 year ago
ANYWAY.............
Doomsday2060 1 year ago
Yeah, right there in the video - you can see the towers going back and to the left... back and to the left. And then... then clearly the people INSIDE set the fires and then shot themselves in the back of their heads. And all before the Bradley Tanks could could get in to save the children.
Whoever pinched Timmy McVey's truck plates that morning should get the Medal of Honor. Those darned A-rabbi Terists.
...it comes to right now. You have the choice - between Love or Fear. - Bill Hicks
030151 2 years ago
you notice the video talks nothing of the basement parking floors under the towers? they became landfill you think maybe david blane waved a wand over the rest is he behind all this?? your fuckers need to go outside a rent a hooker
freakyflow 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"What on Earth happened to the Twin Towers on 9/11?".
Two aircraft were deliberately flown into them - that's what happened.
As for the crap about 12 per cent of the structure and clouds of dust etc, how many experiments with aircraft impacts on super-sized skyscrapers have been conducted to allow us to arrive at that conclusion? Mathematical models are one thing; what happens in real life is quite another.
MSM4U2POM 2 years ago
@MSM4U2POM
And the TV never lies does it?
Why did the BBC announce the collapse of building 7, 30 min prior to its actual collapse? Why is it OK to accuse the MOOOSLIMs of doing 911, but it's racist to mention anything about SilverStein or the 5 Dancing Israelis?
Sure, the TV never lies.
.
ChilesGreen 1 year ago 3
@ChilesGreen
1) "Why did the BBC announce the collapse of building 7, 30 min prior to its actual collapse?".
Because they either received incorrect informtion or misconstrued it. I don't know why so much fuss is made about this, because it doesn't prove a thing;
2) "Why is it Ok to accuse the MOOOSLIMS' of doing 9/11?".
Er, because they did it, and admitted it!
MSM4U2POM 1 year ago
@MSM4U2POM
Typical snarky smart @ss answers one expects from the controlled media. And we're also to believe "thermal expansion and collision damage" caused building 7 to suddenly implode into powder.
I'm not buying any of the official 911 malarkey.
ChilesGreen 1 year ago 2
I feel for the 50thousand + people smothered in the asbestos cloud and for the environment, because those trade towers are still blowing their remains all over usa iff you think about it, so that one event will potentially kill much more than 3thousand poor lives.
jonnijames 2 years ago
It is because the material the building was made from is asbestos. Anyone that is in the vicinity will massive amounts of asbestos exposure.
rp39050 2 years ago
MAEY IT WAS AAAAAAAILLEEEEEEIIIINNNNNNNSSS8*sarcasm*
SpArKyz1001 2 years ago
Jet fuel?
Yeah, right...
"Operation Northwoods" in epic proportions!
richscart 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a link to a petition on my profile to open up a new investigation into 911, you have the option of remaining anonymous. I have seen many signatures from around the world.
Please sign and help spread the word.
Many thanks.
1,582 signatures so far !!
cosmicmind1 2 years ago
Good. Short, but good. Most people's attention span fits with the length.
WTCdemolitions 2 years ago
This is a great video.
Regular explosives couldn't have done it...
ANyone who can see this and still think it was a 'collapse' is mentally ill
marcoddy 2 years ago 15
Don't listen to CNN911Fakes, what he is doing is giving disinformation to discredit the whole 9/11 truth movement!! This cointelpro agent should be exposed.
wearechangeholland 3 years ago
I dont he is an idiot
CarnivoreEschelon 3 years ago
wearechangeholland
159 videos waiting for your keen eyesight to find an error.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Definitely not jet fuel.
Perhaps a shaped charged micro nuke (if such a thing exists) in the basement directed upward? The fireball would be hidden by the collapsing debris.
ChilesGreen 3 years ago
nope bata and gammaradiation would have killed everone for fo quter mile away. Sorry the clean nukes don't exsist
CarnivoreEschelon 3 years ago
@CarnivoreEschelon What a handle.
The (gama rays and fireball) could easily be contained in the bedrock under the base and interior of these buildings, which were instantly pulverized, leaving the undamaged tops to fall through powdered plasma.
Only a nuke can instantly transform 500,000 tons of steel and concrete into dust.
Oh by the way, people in the vicinity of the collapsing Trade Centers are dying of cancers.
ChilesGreen 1 year ago
Why do you show us an image less than 3 blocks from the wtc when trying to show how far the dust went?
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
Sorry alawson, almost all of the material in that dust cloud came from an artist's pen.
What we were shown on TV was false.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
yep so were the shadows you could not edit out.
CarnivoreEschelon 3 years ago
then where is the concrete rubble?
Even conventional explosives create a varied range of rubble sizes... chunks to dust... here we see NO chunks... only dust
Impossible from 'collapse' or regular conventional explosive
marcoddy 2 years ago
If Islamic extremists were capable of violating not only the 2nd law of thermodynamics, but also the law of conservation of momentum, then we really would have a MAJOR problem on our hands. The government's explanation of 9/11 is "politics, bracketed by science". Truthers are just asking questions, and the government and media, hand in hand, are refusing to answer.
bloggulator 3 years ago
This is what needs to be discussed.. No one seems to care to answer how fire causes these gargantuan towers to evaporate. What can hood-wink so many people to not even care anymore? I don't care anymore like most of everyone else who knows that nothing will ever come of this event. No further investigations , no lawsuits, nothing but small bands of "truthers" seeking a cause with which to unite around to give their lives meaning. And yet, In the great scheme of things, nothing ever changes.
WmRios 3 years ago
A very existentialist but accurate portrayal of the situation. One hopeful observation, if I may, is that the scale of this PSYOP event is unprecedented. They may have miscalculated. There is still hope to awaken as many as possible to this and effect some time of change. Let's don't quit.
ricorreze 3 years ago 7
I for one was all for this change, from what I studied in engineering I knew that there was more to this demolishing than mere jet fuel which evaporated for the most part on impact. Ahhhhh, it's just to much to rehash all over again. And like you wrote, the only thing we have is the hope of someone finding the missing links to tie it all together. The conspiracy is the B.S. our gov't wants us to believe not what's being written by us "truthers"
WmRios 3 years ago
Understood. At some point you just need to move on.
ricorreze 3 years ago
yeah move on from that.
that;s insane. All americans swear to DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION FROM ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.
Anyone who wants to just move on either hasn't read the constitution or has had his balls removed
Your founding fathers would be ASHAMED of you
marcoddy 2 years ago
Has anyone analysed the dust sediment to determine what it was formed of?
Damascene2 4 years ago