@vivacoldplay No its not.If it was underpowered as you say,it wouldnt have been certified for commersial traffic.. simple as that.Yes its a poor climber compare to 747 and 777,but every plane on long haul flights is so heavy it cant do it better.. The A340-300 takes off from Princess Juliana on direct flight to France with fuel for the whole flight and fully loaded with cargo/passengers.Thats a 7700ft long runway. A flight that takes 9-11 hours depending on wind/weather. Not underpowered at all.
@vivacoldplay On route from Narita to Kastrup that A340-300 flyes almost 5000 nautical miles. On takeoff it burns a good amount of fuel due to extreme rpm from the engines. my guess is that it carryes at least 70 tons of fuel on take off,have over 200 passengers= 15 tons,and a good amount of cargo. making the plane weigh good over 200 tons. OFCOURSE IT IS A LONG TAKEOFF ROLE!!! A340-300 would NOT have been certified if it was underpowered.
Take off run at MTOW (276 tons) 2,990 metres (9,810 ft)3,000 metres (9,800 ft) For A340-2/300. Engines produces 31,000–34,000 lbf.. Its not underpowered.
@vivacoldplay Yes exactly... and you can see the lbf?? Much bigger you said?? and only 29000lbf more than a340-300 on the 747...thats pr engine... A340-5/600 pr engine = 248–260 kilonewtons (56,000–58,000 lbf) 260–275 kilonewtons (58,000–62,000 lbf) MTOW is 372,000 kilograms (820,000 lb)
@ollo1982 The MD-11 is approximately the same size as the A340-300, but it has up to 150% the power of the A340 (MD-11 has 186000lbs of thrust) and a higher cruise speed, yet it still has about the same range as the A340-300? Does it carry more fuel or is it efficient as the A340-300 during flight?
@vivacoldplay Yes... it has 186000 and the A340-300 have 136000... But look at the takeoff roll at MTOW?? A340-300 have a shorter run than MD11... If it was underpowered as you say,they would have changed the engines to more powerful after some buildt A340-300... because it would have been certified for commersial traffic if it was underpowered...
@vivacoldplay The Airbus 340-600 is longer than a B747.. It is the longest passenger aircraft in the world.. But i think the new boeing 747-8 is about to set the length record :)
SAS scandinavian airlines er den største og den beste i scandinavian men de har veldig dyre billeter innen Europa men noen lang turer er de veldig billige det er veldig bra!!
Passagiere der skandinavischen Fluglinie SAS werden künftig keine andere Wahl haben, als an Bord halal oder gar nichts zu essen. Der Geschäftsführer der Schweizer Firma Gate Gourmet, die für die SAS-Menüs verantwortlich ist, hat nämlich ausgerechnet, es wäre billiger, allen Fluggästen halal zu servieren, als verschiedene Menüs anzubieten. Das bedeutet nun also Tierquälermenues für alle.
@kbalasse i even pushed the button with a glass of water and they came very fast to ask if i did push the button, and they asked me if i wanted water, i am stunned of how good service sas can produce even with their red numbers on the buttomline, combine them with thai or singapore and they might be the best airline in the world
SAS is a very weird company. The things other Company can get profit, SAS cant profit on. their has to be something wrong whit the company management at SAS..
one example, They couldn´t get a profit on the B747?? BritishAirways and other companies can..
SAS a340's are used on long distance routs to Asia and southern America while the A330 are used on shorter long haul flights such as Stockholm-New York.
@OriolusOriole Yeah I saw that… it was the longest plane in the world until Boeing released the 747-8. But that doesn't look as long due to the fact that its fatter and stuff. With two levels and everything…
@OriolusOriole Yes i agree, It looks like a freak! But if a company only extend a older model and put just a few newer feauters. and label it a new product, what did you expect..
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
When???? when J-Carlzon run the show SAS was a great airline. Now it´s a complete disaster. And now with the vulcano dust i really hope SAS will go to shit.
I really hope that the vulcano cloud stays over sweden for atleast two months,making SAS lose millions everyday. Screw this crappy airline.
@unggrabb SAS is a good company,but its far from good to fantastic.. they have a bad service.. taking paid for the food and drinks aboard.. bad flight attendants thats not very service minded.. But they have great pilots,that makes the takeoffs,cruise and landings pretty smooth...
What airline have you been flying with? I have been flying with SAS tons of times and i never EVER have had bad service, they are all allways smiling and helpful and let me have a great time. While onboard.
@MRFREAK177 On the last flight i was with SAS was from Frankfurt to Gardermoen. Service was not the best.. Service on Lufthansa was a HUGE class higher... Who charge almost 5 Euros for a sandwich?? yea,SAS do... and 3 freakin euros for a can of coca cola... thats ripoff! and 2 euros for a coffey... Most likely otherwise on long haul flights tho.. idk...
Unfortunately SAS is not that great airline it used to be, not my favourite anymore :( There are reasons why SAS gets 3 stars while Finnair gets 4, ranked by the global Skytrax.
I Do fly with Finnair nowadays. Best Airline in Scandinavia in my opinion. Very good service every time. I did give SAS one last chance but they sucked even more than than the last time. And i still havent got my luggage. It´s been a month and SAS just dont want to deal with this issue anymore. They actually told me to f@ck off last time i called them and thats is 100% true.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Thank you SAS for loosing my luggage, cancelled my flight without notified me. Changed my buisness class seat to economy due to over booking (BULLSHIT), for giving me a rude and incompetent service. For the piss poor service for 16 damn hours of flight. The crap of Scandinavia.
I will never ever again fly with this poor excuse for an airline. I guess it will not take long before SAS has 2 stars or even worse.
Nice vid, nice plane, nice sound, very nice airline!
VegiRulez 1 year ago
SAS on suttu!
1137Huggernaut 1 year ago
SAS
1137Huggernaut 1 year ago
the a340 is so underpowered its terrifying
vivacoldplay 1 year ago
@vivacoldplay what do you meaaan :(?
starbreez3 1 year ago
@starbreez3 those things are heavy and it seems like the engines are as use full has hair dryers
vivacoldplay 1 year ago
@vivacoldplay No its not.If it was underpowered as you say,it wouldnt have been certified for commersial traffic.. simple as that.Yes its a poor climber compare to 747 and 777,but every plane on long haul flights is so heavy it cant do it better.. The A340-300 takes off from Princess Juliana on direct flight to France with fuel for the whole flight and fully loaded with cargo/passengers.Thats a 7700ft long runway. A flight that takes 9-11 hours depending on wind/weather. Not underpowered at all.
ollo1982 9 months ago
@ollo1982 no not underpowered at all. Just took 10 seconds to rotate
vivacoldplay 9 months ago
@vivacoldplay On route from Narita to Kastrup that A340-300 flyes almost 5000 nautical miles. On takeoff it burns a good amount of fuel due to extreme rpm from the engines. my guess is that it carryes at least 70 tons of fuel on take off,have over 200 passengers= 15 tons,and a good amount of cargo. making the plane weigh good over 200 tons. OFCOURSE IT IS A LONG TAKEOFF ROLE!!! A340-300 would NOT have been certified if it was underpowered.
ollo1982 9 months ago
@vivacoldplay Required runway at MTOW(396 tons) 10,466 ft (3,190 m) 10,893 ft (3,320 m) 9,902 ft (3,018 m)
ER: 10,138 ft (3,090 m) 10,138 ft (3,090 m) For 747. Engines Produces PW 63,300 lbf (282 kN)
GE 62,100 lbf (276 kN)RR 59,500/60,600 lbf (265/270 kN)
Take off run at MTOW (276 tons) 2,990 metres (9,810 ft)3,000 metres (9,800 ft) For A340-2/300. Engines produces 31,000–34,000 lbf.. Its not underpowered.
ollo1982 9 months ago
@ollo1982 sorry but a 747-400 is MUCH bigger than an a340 so idk why you are comparing them
vivacoldplay 9 months ago
@vivacoldplay Yes exactly... and you can see the lbf?? Much bigger you said?? and only 29000lbf more than a340-300 on the 747...thats pr engine... A340-5/600 pr engine = 248–260 kilonewtons (56,000–58,000 lbf) 260–275 kilonewtons (58,000–62,000 lbf) MTOW is 372,000 kilograms (820,000 lb)
HGW: 380,000 kilograms (840,000 lb) 368,000 kilograms (810,000 lb)
HGW: 380,000 kilograms (840,000 lb) T/O Roll at MTOW 3,050 metres (10,010 ft) 3,100 metres (10,200 ft)
ollo1982 9 months ago
@ollo1982 The MD-11 is approximately the same size as the A340-300, but it has up to 150% the power of the A340 (MD-11 has 186000lbs of thrust) and a higher cruise speed, yet it still has about the same range as the A340-300? Does it carry more fuel or is it efficient as the A340-300 during flight?
vivacoldplay 9 months ago
@vivacoldplay Yes... it has 186000 and the A340-300 have 136000... But look at the takeoff roll at MTOW?? A340-300 have a shorter run than MD11... If it was underpowered as you say,they would have changed the engines to more powerful after some buildt A340-300... because it would have been certified for commersial traffic if it was underpowered...
ollo1982 9 months ago
@vivacoldplay The Airbus 340-600 is longer than a B747.. It is the longest passenger aircraft in the world.. But i think the new boeing 747-8 is about to set the length record :)
jegerproletar 5 months ago
I like the sound of the engines!
willettgarrett 1 year ago
SAS scandinavian airlines er den største og den beste i scandinavian men de har veldig dyre billeter innen Europa men noen lang turer er de veldig billige det er veldig bra!!
omar66295 1 year ago
Passagiere der skandinavischen Fluglinie SAS werden künftig keine andere Wahl haben, als an Bord halal oder gar nichts zu essen. Der Geschäftsführer der Schweizer Firma Gate Gourmet, die für die SAS-Menüs verantwortlich ist, hat nämlich ausgerechnet, es wäre billiger, allen Fluggästen halal zu servieren, als verschiedene Menüs anzubieten. Das bedeutet nun also Tierquälermenues für alle.
XStandupforfreedomX 1 year ago
SAS is best!
kbalasse 1 year ago
@kbalasse i even pushed the button with a glass of water and they came very fast to ask if i did push the button, and they asked me if i wanted water, i am stunned of how good service sas can produce even with their red numbers on the buttomline, combine them with thai or singapore and they might be the best airline in the world
skylineXpert 1 year ago
KLM!
107brian 1 year ago
SAS is a very weird company. The things other Company can get profit, SAS cant profit on. their has to be something wrong whit the company management at SAS..
one example, They couldn´t get a profit on the B747?? BritishAirways and other companies can..
xirux01 1 year ago
@xirux01 That's because we haven't got enough passengers for it to be profitable, you fucking idiot.
beirch 1 year ago
SAS a340's are used on long distance routs to Asia and southern America while the A330 are used on shorter long haul flights such as Stockholm-New York.
hzhenrik 1 year ago
I had no idea Airbus made a 4-engine airliner other than the A380 and I'm a plane buff. Damn this is shocking.
I don't really care for Airbuses but this one's pretty cool the fuselage is so long
blueblob4 1 year ago
@blueblob4 Check out a340-600, the longest airliner in the world. If you like long fuselages...... I mean, it is "too" long :)
OriolusOriole 1 year ago
@OriolusOriole Yeah I saw that… it was the longest plane in the world until Boeing released the 747-8. But that doesn't look as long due to the fact that its fatter and stuff. With two levels and everything…
blueblob4 1 year ago
@blueblob4 Yeah..... But the passenger version of the 747-8 hasn't flown yet, only test flights of the cargo version
OriolusOriole 1 year ago
@OriolusOriole Yes i agree, It looks like a freak! But if a company only extend a older model and put just a few newer feauters. and label it a new product, what did you expect..
xirux01 1 year ago
SAS is one of the best airlines in the world!!!
TheGorbaa 1 year ago 7
Very nice!
NaughtyLover92 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
When???? when J-Carlzon run the show SAS was a great airline. Now it´s a complete disaster. And now with the vulcano dust i really hope SAS will go to shit.
I really hope that the vulcano cloud stays over sweden for atleast two months,making SAS lose millions everyday. Screw this crappy airline.
Sooksawaspakdee961 1 year ago
Comment removed
LarsCleemannHors 1 year ago
one of the best airline companies, sadly they have a big crise
DannebrogWiking 1 year ago
SAS is the best! I flew with them a month ago from Beijing with the Aribsu 340, and its in my top 3 airliners! Also in top three 737-600 and CRJ-900!
AO1145 1 year ago 2
I love SAS!!!
FlamingoBoy95 1 year ago
Often flown with. SK 983 Kopenhagen - Tokio
MirekBaal83 2 years ago
Best Airline in Scandinavia
Etonfour 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Finnair is :)
PhilipDK5800 2 years ago
Also biggest
DetEJagDe 1 year ago
If you are a SAS hater - Why bothner looing for SAS videos?
SAS is fab, went to Zurich over the xmas break, SAS are fantastic.
unggrabb 2 years ago 29
@unggrabb SAS is a good company,but its far from good to fantastic.. they have a bad service.. taking paid for the food and drinks aboard.. bad flight attendants thats not very service minded.. But they have great pilots,that makes the takeoffs,cruise and landings pretty smooth...
ollo1982 1 year ago
@ollo1982
What airline have you been flying with? I have been flying with SAS tons of times and i never EVER have had bad service, they are all allways smiling and helpful and let me have a great time. While onboard.
MRFREAK177 9 months ago
@MRFREAK177 On the last flight i was with SAS was from Frankfurt to Gardermoen. Service was not the best.. Service on Lufthansa was a HUGE class higher... Who charge almost 5 Euros for a sandwich?? yea,SAS do... and 3 freakin euros for a can of coca cola... thats ripoff! and 2 euros for a coffey... Most likely otherwise on long haul flights tho.. idk...
ollo1982 9 months ago
Unfortunately SAS is not that great airline it used to be, not my favourite anymore :( There are reasons why SAS gets 3 stars while Finnair gets 4, ranked by the global Skytrax.
mikrokupu 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i like Norwegian, its the best airline in Scandinavia^^:)
jorkpett1991 2 years ago
@jorkpett1991 no it's not =)
boardning 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I Do fly with Finnair nowadays. Best Airline in Scandinavia in my opinion. Very good service every time. I did give SAS one last chance but they sucked even more than than the last time. And i still havent got my luggage. It´s been a month and SAS just dont want to deal with this issue anymore. They actually told me to f@ck off last time i called them and thats is 100% true.
Sooksawaspakdee961 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thank you SAS for loosing my luggage, cancelled my flight without notified me. Changed my buisness class seat to economy due to over booking (BULLSHIT), for giving me a rude and incompetent service. For the piss poor service for 16 damn hours of flight. The crap of Scandinavia.
I will never ever again fly with this poor excuse for an airline. I guess it will not take long before SAS has 2 stars or even worse.
Sooksawaspakdee961 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SAS is in general among the worst airlines in the world. I'd rather fly Aeroflot, at least they got a brand new A330 fleet.
Next time, fly with Finnair!
PhilipDK5800 2 years ago
@Sooksawaspakdee961 SAS is ratet to be one of the best airline companies both in service and flight on time! ;)
DannebrogWiking 1 year ago 2
I like the colour scheme on SAS aircraft
Jazz8584 2 years ago 4
Nice takeoff.
GucciNice 2 years ago 5
SAS is not better more than Thai airways Thai 4 star but SAS 3 star !!!
ThaiairwaysTG955 2 years ago
I agree, but Sas is the best airline here in Scandinavia
LudvikM94 2 years ago 5
I'm sure Thai is better than SAS but also better than many other airlines!!
m1r3o 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Learn English idiot
roxetterc747 2 years ago
@roxetterc747 learn to be polite idiot
jnbedros 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a fuck do you want? Did i said something to you? Learn to not go into things that dont belong to you. Grew up ffs!
roxetterc747 2 years ago
The beauty of Scandinavia :D
LudvikM94 2 years ago 36
I like the sounds of the engines. 5/5 stars.
LudvikM94 2 years ago 4
been on that specific aircraft ;)
rukor 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
no sound compares to boeing planes sorry!!!!!!!!!!
waielg 2 years ago
Umm... alot of airbus and boeing planes use basically the same engines...
Fry20009 2 years ago 3
wthr its airbus or boeing the engine sound comes from RR or CFM power plants..the airframer has nthng to do with its sound,,
nuwanthevampire 2 years ago 4
Boeing and airbus uses the same engien manufacture so the only sound different will be the engien type not how big or small the airplane is
bufo111 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cause boeing sucks!!!
ugnut123 2 years ago
Why?
privatealeks 2 years ago 2
awesome sound!
bwells86 3 years ago 4