I don't see why everyone likes him so much :/ he's a shit player and he is always passive and he doesn't use skills to win matches and he doesalways just wait for the opponent to slip up.
I believe him to be arrogant either, cocky, yes but that was a very bad shot so he hasn't got a right to be a bit cocky. He's actually quite cocky if you see him talk in interviews. And he's toned up since then, shitter fitness will make him shitter mentally with the game.
To be honest , it looked more like he wasn't sure if he had won the point or not. He was running away from the net and facing the other direction so he could not see. I don't think it was a comment on Querry's inability to return. Andy is my favourite tennis player to watch because he does show so much emotion. I really don't understand how people can say he is passive.
lol why do i feel like this looked like a exibition, they move so awkwardly. lol and then murray sticks up his hand at the end like " what u couldnt get that bitch?"
from wat ive seen, murray just has to work on a few things 1. improve his attacking game 2. improve his smash 3. get his fitness back to what it was 4. learn to hit a better down the line forehand 5. stand closer to the baseline on rallies, whether attacking or defending 6. ignore the crap people say about him
I don't see why everyone hates him so much :/ he's a good player and he isn't always passive and he does use skills to win matches and he doesn't always just wait for the opponent to slip up.
I don't believe him to be arrogant either, cocky, yes but that was a very good shot so he has a right to be a bit cocky. He's actually quite shy if you see him talk in interviews. And he's toned up since then, better fitness will make him better mentally with the game.
@PFloydism you are calling a stranger a 'fucktard'. This is what is so awful about the internet, people get overly aggressive for no reason at all because they are behind a computer screen. Learn some respect for other people, I made a mistake 4 months ago....so don't lose your temper over it :/
@Mmazrocks13 well you write a whole essay as if you know what you're talking about arguing a case against me(well not me in particular but with what i think) and being arrogant when not only do you not have a clue what you're talking about, but you don't even know how to speak proper english
@PFloydism I sort of know what I'm talking about, I never siad I was an expert. And sorry if my english isn't good but but not only is it not my first language but I have dyslexia. Whatever the way, you have just called a child a fucktard. So i applaud you, well done.
@Mmazrocks13 english isn't my first language either and I refuse to beleive your dyslexia has anything to do with you not knowing the diffrence between arrogant and cocky, so don't even try and use that as an excuse, that's frankly quite pathetic and undermines dyslexia in itself (i have some good friend who are dyslexic) don't act like it's a major handicap and use as it as an excuse for your stupidity and arrogance, that's quite frankly offensive.
@Mmazrocks13 I apologise for calling you a fucktard but please, for the benefit of this world, sort yourself out, I found some of the things you said quite pathetic and offensive (not to me personally but to others) and stay out of things you don't know about
it is time the murray fans 9or mugs) admitted he just hasnt got it. he looks good in early rounds against inferior opponents but as soon as he gets to the business end of slams he cant step his game up a level and i doubt he has the mental strength as well.
but i suppose the murray fans will continue to make excuses to cover his failings and continue to delude themselves.
@spaycehoppa no the complete opposite. nadal is in a different league to murray. nadal has mental strength in depth, a will to win and never give up plus the ability to raise his game a level when he needs to whereas murray doesnt possess any of these qualities.
Aslong as the tennis greats like sampras,Agassi,borg,McEnroe,federer,nadal, ALL RATE MURRAY HIGHLY as a great player.Thats all that matters as they know a hell of alot more about the game than random you tube twats who are calling him crap and blatantly lying. Get a life cunts!
@gnostical listen man... do you honestly think that any of those guys would bash murray? i mean think about it where do you hear them praising him? in the media... why would they start bashing him when everyone in the entire world can hear what their saying? obviously murray is a good player but... he does have a tendancy to start choking when the going gets tough esp during the slams. The problem isnt that he doesnt have the game... he just gets too passive under pressure.
@JunYong55 you are very correct my friend, I love Murray's style of play, and that is something that I get annoyed about, like the Ausie open final against Federer he was too passive, he wasnt going for his shots.
@MightyIronHead Yea i know... i wish he would start playing more aggressive during the big moments... cuz for sure he has the game to break britains dry spell at te slams...
Genius shot? haha More like wild impromptu shot that worked. Murray's a good competitor. He doesn't have any real weapons to beat Fed and a few others. Defense only goes so far.
@pmo1983 Because he's a w*nker. Pause it at 0:09 and a 6 year old could tell that he knows that hes won the point.....But he has to try and big himself up more by faking amazement at his own shot, I hate this c*nt.....Famous and rich because he has really good hand eye co-ordination :(
He has what they call Federesk shots, he has skilled hands. You cant teach alot of what Murray has. Thats why he is dangerous. Like him or hate him. He will prevail.
Yes, I agree, infact I would say that Andys game gets under Rogers game more than Rogers does Andy, even tho the slam went Rogers way. Andy is a fast learner........it makes mens tennis all that more exciting.
@clivebull1 Murray's not even vaguely an "artist of the game". Come on. He's a steady baseliner/retriever who doesn't make many mistakes. He's a lot like Djoker really but better defense. It ain't that special. That's why Fed spanks him more often than not. Murray doesn't have any real weapons.
@cavaleer Murray is one of the best in the game thats a fact ,hes alot more to his game than all of them except federer/nadal .You just sit at home and judge when looking over your fat belly towards the tv calling him rubbish . Idiot
murray is a very good player why do people think he's shit obviously he must be shit to get to world number 2 and beat federer consistently lets see what any of us can do against federer
There's no doubt he's an extremely skillful player, but I just don't think he has the winning mentality. His mind seems to wander and lose focus just when he needs it the most.
defintley his mind wonders when he beats federer lmao murray has great focus now but he needs a coach and he needs to come to the net he's really good up there and his serve is good enough for it
Nooob, how original, you are obviously very intelligent.
Federer is good, but he won all those titles in an era of shit players. Now Murray, Nadal and even Del Potro are gonna snatch his position of dominance away next year : )
aham... Mhmmm Let´s see..Us open final 2008?, Us open final 2007? semi and final of Cincinnati 2009 ?. If federer plays with his 100%, nobody can beat him ;). Murray beat him because Federer was not playing at his best, and to be honest, the game of Murray is really of a pussy, pure deffense and counterattack.The class and elegance of the shots of federer is unique.
pre2009 verdasco wasn't known for his consistency and still struggles to make headway against the top players. He showed devastating hot form in AO 09 but cooled down for the rest of the season.
Murray appears to be vulnerable against big-hitting players on fire where the extended 5 set format of grand slams gives them time to play into form.
It doesn't matter in a head-to-head aspect. The fact is, in a tournament of 7 rounds, for two weeks - he can't expect every player to slip up so much. Whether it be Verdasco, Cilic, Roddick, or whomever, Murray will eventually run into someone hot. Typicay was exactly right to point out those two players because those matches were examples of this veryt hing.
As much as I like Murray, he's gonna need to take initiative in his game at times if he wants to take the whole thing.
Not genius. You wanna take home the big trophy you have to be able to be the aggressor on certain occasions, which Murray has proven to be capable (vs Nadal, US Open 2008) but he can definitely be taken to town sometimes against hard hitters.
Like Nadal....who Murray just put out of the AUST oPEN SLAM....yea he doesnt have a winning formula.............right. Spec savers has a sale on just now.......
He just uses the shots he has for the players he plays. Sometimes aggressive is not the way to go. As you can see with the Isner game. Murray CHOSE not to go for aces. He knows how to play and adapts his game...not many can do that.
He has a mensa brain for tennis, the experts say, I tend to agree
What Im trying to say is that sometimes he plays passively and that isnt enoughto win him matches. Think about who he lost to in slams since WImbledon 08; Federer, Veradsco, Gonzalez, Roddick and Cilic. Do you see the correlation. They are all aggressive. I understand that he has great variety, defense and talent but SOMETIMES he doesnt think and plays passive. Better aggressive players will always be able to beat him as Murray won't be able to hustle their points consistently.
No I dont agree, Murray will use what he needs too....as he did with Nadal today and before08 and with Federer08 etc. Aggressive is only part of the game, you need the rest to be sucessful. Roger is not always agressive, but he is the best player ever, and yet Murray has a winning h2h over him. Give Murray time he is still young, Federer didnt get his slam until his 17th attempt and he was 23
@CASPER10666 Holy shit Casper, you are in nearly every Andy Murray fucking you tube page.I'm Scottish and while at first couldnt be botherd with him,i find myself now beginning to warm to him a bit.
@Lolz4lafs No, it's just pathetic to win a game on your openents errors instead of your good talent, simply pathetic. He makes the game about who can lose the less instead of who can win the most. That's why Murray will always be a second-class tennis player
@khurapic no, but federer and nadal do, and they are far better than Murray, Nadal due to his aggresive style and Federer due to his skillfull style. I have played tennis at an amateur level, competing in tournaments and I can assure you that anyone with a bit of skill can beat someone who plays like Murray, that's why Murray is so pathetic and will never win anything significant (or will be lucky if he does)
@ownthelaws Obviously. Because what he said about Andy applies to Caroline..., "game is one of waiting not aggression so they just wait till their opponent slips up that's not pussy that's genius"
And, by the way, The talent not always coincides with results. Gaudio, for example is a very talented guy, but his mind is a shit. Coria was a faggot too. The merit of Federer is that he could match talent with regularly.
Of course, Gasquet has been banned and won nothing of note for a couple of seasons. Nalbandians last tournament was being knocked out in the second round of the Australian Open. Of course their more talented....
??? EXTREMELY nice shot, but not genius. Come on, now. The word should be reserved for something absolutely extraordinary. This is an awesome shot but I've seen much crazier (Santoro's tweener lob against Spadea and Agassi's 'magic shot' vs. Corretja come to mind)
genius is defined as someone who has exceptional ability and originality. in this rally murray shows both and on that basis he is a genius and the shot is genius. if it didn't take something special players like murray would be ten a penny, which they aren't, and you'd see similiar shots all the time, which you don't. many world-class (top 50) players are 'genius' and very capable of similiarly 'genius' shots. you usually don't get to the top of tennis otherwise. only my opinion, mind you.
Well, hi then Santa Barbara. Anyone that is a fan of tennis would say that's a genius shot. I'm not biased. I would have said the same if ANY other player had hit that shot. The fact that it was Murray is irrelevant.
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't see why everyone likes him so much :/ he's a shit player and he is always passive and he doesn't use skills to win matches and he doesalways just wait for the opponent to slip up.
I believe him to be arrogant either, cocky, yes but that was a very bad shot so he hasn't got a right to be a bit cocky. He's actually quite cocky if you see him talk in interviews. And he's toned up since then, shitter fitness will make him shitter mentally with the game.
I hate him.
anS0N1997 4 weeks ago
yes,he is a good player,but what about Kim Sears??
Kaiba857 1 month ago
i saw that video and i think murray is 3.5 player i can play with fim jejej
CristinaxX100 1 month ago
he is a tactical genius
mrSnakeeye20 2 months ago
2 bad u can't win a slam
soberupnow 2 months ago
he is fine player not more than that
m03taz111 2 months ago
To be honest , it looked more like he wasn't sure if he had won the point or not. He was running away from the net and facing the other direction so he could not see. I don't think it was a comment on Querry's inability to return. Andy is my favourite tennis player to watch because he does show so much emotion. I really don't understand how people can say he is passive.
JacqueyCh 3 months ago 4
lol why do i feel like this looked like a exibition, they move so awkwardly. lol and then murray sticks up his hand at the end like " what u couldnt get that bitch?"
millionairejh 4 months ago
My favorite player- he's so sexy and has such great variety to his game.
benegeseritwhore 4 months ago
scottish Jerk
cascantediego 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why the hell do people record their TV screens?!
D101N1 5 months ago
from wat ive seen, murray just has to work on a few things 1. improve his attacking game 2. improve his smash 3. get his fitness back to what it was 4. learn to hit a better down the line forehand 5. stand closer to the baseline on rallies, whether attacking or defending 6. ignore the crap people say about him
mgmor7 5 months ago 9
@mgmor7 u should be his coach instead of his mother which by the way i hate
cro91Maderfaker 1 month ago
@mgmor7 yes some random person on youtube is going to tell Andy Murray what he needs to work on. hahaha
patrickkawka 3 weeks ago
as long as djokovic and nadal (and federer, perhaps) is around, it will be tough for him to win a slam. he's good, but no match for the top 3.
platoonutzeyz 6 months ago
@platoonutzeyz
He's beaten all three of them so he most certainly is a match for them. He has the game but not the confidence in my opinion.
mrwho995 3 months ago
He look like a pussy hitting like that and the reaction is very queer!
drgreendick 7 months ago
Wich pixel is murray?
knabbel3 7 months ago
@knabbel3 Old joke, and not funny here.
cdn19940804 7 months ago
@cdn19940804
i know
knabbel3 7 months ago
did you record it with your asshole?
R17101 8 months ago 3
@R17101 lmao
guiguideg92 8 months ago
LOL at his reaction
SolsburyHill22 8 months ago
he has the patience of an alligator
Fernandez218 8 months ago 3
he love doing that shot
ffallenaangel 8 months ago
That backhand ground stroke by Murray was the worst backhand from a professional player I've ever seen
congrang 9 months ago
0:09 Look at this.. Prrrr
dany260690 9 months ago
He has amazing instinctive touch
HairyInLondon1 10 months ago
obviously just expected that the other guy was gonna just volley it back.
yamborghini3 1 year ago
Wonderful!
Nothing problem at all.If I had I did say anything.
GerseZoltan 1 year ago
66666th viewer
tyronelpz 1 year ago
Murray and Davydenko are my favourite players so i like it ;d
mechkapechka 1 year ago
0.10 sound like break wind^^
johnnygkl 1 year ago
I don't see why everyone hates him so much :/ he's a good player and he isn't always passive and he does use skills to win matches and he doesn't always just wait for the opponent to slip up.
I don't believe him to be arrogant either, cocky, yes but that was a very good shot so he has a right to be a bit cocky. He's actually quite shy if you see him talk in interviews. And he's toned up since then, better fitness will make him better mentally with the game.
I like him.
Mmazrocks13 1 year ago 85
@Mmazrocks13 arrogant and cocky mean the same thing you fucktard
PFloydism 9 months ago
@PFloydism you are calling a stranger a 'fucktard'. This is what is so awful about the internet, people get overly aggressive for no reason at all because they are behind a computer screen. Learn some respect for other people, I made a mistake 4 months ago....so don't lose your temper over it :/
Mmazrocks13 9 months ago
@Mmazrocks13 well you write a whole essay as if you know what you're talking about arguing a case against me(well not me in particular but with what i think) and being arrogant when not only do you not have a clue what you're talking about, but you don't even know how to speak proper english
PFloydism 9 months ago
@PFloydism I sort of know what I'm talking about, I never siad I was an expert. And sorry if my english isn't good but but not only is it not my first language but I have dyslexia. Whatever the way, you have just called a child a fucktard. So i applaud you, well done.
Mmazrocks13 9 months ago
@Mmazrocks13 english isn't my first language either and I refuse to beleive your dyslexia has anything to do with you not knowing the diffrence between arrogant and cocky, so don't even try and use that as an excuse, that's frankly quite pathetic and undermines dyslexia in itself (i have some good friend who are dyslexic) don't act like it's a major handicap and use as it as an excuse for your stupidity and arrogance, that's quite frankly offensive.
PFloydism 9 months ago
@Mmazrocks13 I apologise for calling you a fucktard but please, for the benefit of this world, sort yourself out, I found some of the things you said quite pathetic and offensive (not to me personally but to others) and stay out of things you don't know about
PFloydism 9 months ago
@Mmazrocks13 hes a miserable cunt and hes never gonna win a slam.
SJGibbons1000 6 months ago
@Mmazrocks13 He's not going to win a slam though I just don't see that happening unfortunately.
hattrickster33 2 months ago
@Mmazrocks13 murray is gay
Simonsmsn 2 months ago
@Mmazrocks13 AGREED!
mackensie2212 2 months ago
nice but djokovic is still better
FireHumor 1 year ago
badminton
olemew 1 year ago
the genius about this was that he pretended a topspin twohanded backhand and suddenly just pushed it accurately along querrey.. nice one Andy
zekeHXC 1 year ago
Fuck you!Roger Tweener is the best!!!Murray suck!!!
johnnygkl 1 year ago
what a pusher.
ccauffma 1 year ago
GENIUSSSSSSSS
ownthelaws 1 year ago
Murray a genius? Now way. he is just passive.
Rafathaman94 1 year ago
He's really stepped up his game and started playing aggressive since he fired his coach. Look for him in the US open.
brent0390 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@brent0390 "Look for him in the US open."
i'm still looking...
ghlover2001 1 year ago
nothing special
dre10121012 1 year ago 4
it is time the murray fans 9or mugs) admitted he just hasnt got it. he looks good in early rounds against inferior opponents but as soon as he gets to the business end of slams he cant step his game up a level and i doubt he has the mental strength as well.
but i suppose the murray fans will continue to make excuses to cover his failings and continue to delude themselves.
azertyuiop32 1 year ago
@azertyuiop32 you call Nadal inferior?
spaycehoppa 1 year ago
@spaycehoppa no the complete opposite. nadal is in a different league to murray. nadal has mental strength in depth, a will to win and never give up plus the ability to raise his game a level when he needs to whereas murray doesnt possess any of these qualities.
azertyuiop32 1 year ago
Aslong as the tennis greats like sampras,Agassi,borg,McEnroe,federer,nadal, ALL RATE MURRAY HIGHLY as a great player.Thats all that matters as they know a hell of alot more about the game than random you tube twats who are calling him crap and blatantly lying. Get a life cunts!
gnostical 1 year ago
@gnostical RESPECT!
SulthanaB226 1 year ago
@gnostical listen man... do you honestly think that any of those guys would bash murray? i mean think about it where do you hear them praising him? in the media... why would they start bashing him when everyone in the entire world can hear what their saying? obviously murray is a good player but... he does have a tendancy to start choking when the going gets tough esp during the slams. The problem isnt that he doesnt have the game... he just gets too passive under pressure.
JunYong55 1 year ago
@JunYong55 you are very correct my friend, I love Murray's style of play, and that is something that I get annoyed about, like the Ausie open final against Federer he was too passive, he wasnt going for his shots.
MightyIronHead 1 year ago
@MightyIronHead Yea i know... i wish he would start playing more aggressive during the big moments... cuz for sure he has the game to break britains dry spell at te slams...
JunYong55 1 year ago
Oh dear.
Jackothespacko 1 year ago
Genius shot? haha More like wild impromptu shot that worked. Murray's a good competitor. He doesn't have any real weapons to beat Fed and a few others. Defense only goes so far.
cavaleer 1 year ago
0:11 hahahahahahha pfffff
cro91Maderfaker 1 year ago
why does Murray pretend he dosent know what happened?
pmo1983 1 year ago 138
@pmo1983 he's another immature brit
IKnowWereYouSleep 1 year ago
@pmo1983 Nah he doesn't get why the crowd is cheering for him; the winner took no effort!
hattrickster33 1 year ago
@pmo1983 because he is arrogant
nipal1234 1 year ago
That's a reaction from roddick saying something probably... like roddick saying "that's BS"
tennis21000 1 year ago
@pmo1983 cause he is a cocky mother fucker!!!!
gonzatlas 1 year ago
@pmo1983 Because he's a w*nker. Pause it at 0:09 and a 6 year old could tell that he knows that hes won the point.....But he has to try and big himself up more by faking amazement at his own shot, I hate this c*nt.....Famous and rich because he has really good hand eye co-ordination :(
jamiesgamebattles4 1 year ago
@pmo1983 That's how Murray celebrates points: Amnesia. He did the same thing after he hit a winner around the net post against Cilic at the AO.
coceth 7 months ago
@pmo1983 he wasn't. that was his shitty little signal for the towel boy
fbinsulation 6 months ago
@fbinsulation it is pretty shitty
sjin4ever 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Murray= Real Tennis #1!
MrDillonBasi 1 year ago
roger is the best!look at us open 2009 semi final!he vs djokkovc.
johnnygkl 2 years ago
overall im not a real fan of murrays game but i must say, that was a clever flick shot.
BrotherTree1 2 years ago
He has what they call Federesk shots, he has skilled hands. You cant teach alot of what Murray has. Thats why he is dangerous. Like him or hate him. He will prevail.
CASPER10666 2 years ago 3
@CASPER10666 As an artist of the game and a tactician, Andy is second only to Federer, out of all the players on the tour today.
clivebull1 2 years ago 2
Yes, I agree, infact I would say that Andys game gets under Rogers game more than Rogers does Andy, even tho the slam went Rogers way. Andy is a fast learner........it makes mens tennis all that more exciting.
CASPER10666 2 years ago 2
Murray will NEVER match Federer's 16 slams.NEVER
timafi 1 year ago
@timafi Because you love Federer.
RCMasterification 1 year ago 2
@timafi duh
awesomekidddo 1 year ago
Comment removed
zoolander0110 1 year ago
@clivebull1 Murray's not even vaguely an "artist of the game". Come on. He's a steady baseliner/retriever who doesn't make many mistakes. He's a lot like Djoker really but better defense. It ain't that special. That's why Fed spanks him more often than not. Murray doesn't have any real weapons.
cavaleer 1 year ago
@cavaleer You do know that Murray has a winning record over Federer, right?
Juddenmar 1 year ago
@Juddenmar Well so far every big match that Federer and Murray played resulted in Federer winning (Barclays, grandslams).
AwantedNinja 1 year ago
@cavaleer Murray is one of the best in the game thats a fact ,hes alot more to his game than all of them except federer/nadal .You just sit at home and judge when looking over your fat belly towards the tv calling him rubbish . Idiot
gnostical 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I hate Murray and his flick shot
sauceyboy 2 years ago
that was a squash/badminton shot, pure wrist and didn't even turn his upper body - brilliant shot!
evilmunki54 2 years ago 3
murray is a very good player why do people think he's shit obviously he must be shit to get to world number 2 and beat federer consistently lets see what any of us can do against federer
tvvideos365 2 years ago 4
There's no doubt he's an extremely skillful player, but I just don't think he has the winning mentality. His mind seems to wander and lose focus just when he needs it the most.
reb0118 2 years ago
defintley his mind wonders when he beats federer lmao murray has great focus now but he needs a coach and he needs to come to the net he's really good up there and his serve is good enough for it
tvvideos365 2 years ago
What a legend, most naturally talented in the world. No wonder Federer hates him so much.
Critchy39 2 years ago 2
Haha..... Hahahahha!
That was funny :)
Alexes1233 2 years ago
Comment removed
bragunovskoie 2 years ago
Nooob, how original, you are obviously very intelligent.
Federer is good, but he won all those titles in an era of shit players. Now Murray, Nadal and even Del Potro are gonna snatch his position of dominance away next year : )
Critchy39 2 years ago
aham... Mhmmm Let´s see..Us open final 2008?, Us open final 2007? semi and final of Cincinnati 2009 ?. If federer plays with his 100%, nobody can beat him ;). Murray beat him because Federer was not playing at his best, and to be honest, the game of Murray is really of a pussy, pure deffense and counterattack.The class and elegance of the shots of federer is unique.
bragunovskoie 2 years ago
Andy's game is one of waiting not aggression so he just waits till his opponent slips up that's not pussy that's genius
Lolz4lafs 2 years ago 43
doesn't work when his opponents fail to slip, ie cilic, Verdasco
typicay 2 years ago
@typicay
An 8-1 H2H against Verdasco doesnt say so?
MacHoodio 2 years ago 2
pre2009 verdasco wasn't known for his consistency and still struggles to make headway against the top players. He showed devastating hot form in AO 09 but cooled down for the rest of the season.
Murray appears to be vulnerable against big-hitting players on fire where the extended 5 set format of grand slams gives them time to play into form.
typicay 2 years ago 3
It doesn't matter in a head-to-head aspect. The fact is, in a tournament of 7 rounds, for two weeks - he can't expect every player to slip up so much. Whether it be Verdasco, Cilic, Roddick, or whomever, Murray will eventually run into someone hot. Typicay was exactly right to point out those two players because those matches were examples of this veryt hing.
As much as I like Murray, he's gonna need to take initiative in his game at times if he wants to take the whole thing.
TakeshiMomoshiro 2 years ago 2
2h2 does matter, its the mental thing.
Just watch Murray now, he has built up his stamina, his strength and has changed a few things.....as they say. just watch
CASPER10666 2 years ago
His game is really inteligent , i don´t deny that. But i don´t like the players who speculate so much!.
bragunovskoie 2 years ago
Not genius. You wanna take home the big trophy you have to be able to be the aggressor on certain occasions, which Murray has proven to be capable (vs Nadal, US Open 2008) but he can definitely be taken to town sometimes against hard hitters.
ShadeXH 2 years ago
he doesn't play to win, he plays to not lose. It's not always a winning formula against guys who are aggressive and are hitting more winners than UEs
ArjanK1206 2 years ago
Like Nadal....who Murray just put out of the AUST oPEN SLAM....yea he doesnt have a winning formula.............right. Spec savers has a sale on just now.......
CASPER10666 2 years ago
i wrote that before the aussie open and i have to say he has become a lot more agressive. which is good.
ArjanK1206 2 years ago
He just uses the shots he has for the players he plays. Sometimes aggressive is not the way to go. As you can see with the Isner game. Murray CHOSE not to go for aces. He knows how to play and adapts his game...not many can do that.
He has a mensa brain for tennis, the experts say, I tend to agree
CASPER10666 2 years ago
What Im trying to say is that sometimes he plays passively and that isnt enoughto win him matches. Think about who he lost to in slams since WImbledon 08; Federer, Veradsco, Gonzalez, Roddick and Cilic. Do you see the correlation. They are all aggressive. I understand that he has great variety, defense and talent but SOMETIMES he doesnt think and plays passive. Better aggressive players will always be able to beat him as Murray won't be able to hustle their points consistently.
ArjanK1206 2 years ago
No I dont agree, Murray will use what he needs too....as he did with Nadal today and before08 and with Federer08 etc. Aggressive is only part of the game, you need the rest to be sucessful. Roger is not always agressive, but he is the best player ever, and yet Murray has a winning h2h over him. Give Murray time he is still young, Federer didnt get his slam until his 17th attempt and he was 23
CASPER10666 2 years ago
he was 21 and 10 months actually...
and so then in your opinion what was the reason he lost to those guys in last years grand slams then?
And Federer is always at his best when he's aggressive.
ArjanK1206 2 years ago
You get the point.....
You want me to name all 17, ok
1- 13 - he was too young and inexperienced.
14 - 08 - Virus - in bed for 2 days - sick for 3 wks+
16 - 09 - Injured wriste - kept him our for 6wks
17 - 10 - Semi final - still to come.
CASPER10666 2 years ago
He shouldn't have got that far if those are the reasons he lost.
and those aren't all of them
the fact is he lost because those guys outplayed him because he never attempted to get the upper hand in the rally unless given on a plate.
ArjanK1206 2 years ago
Those are the reasons........factual actually.....but obviously your not interested in facts, you just want to make up the story to fit your case.
sorry....conversation ended, not into delusional thinkers.
CASPER10666 2 years ago
@CASPER10666 Holy shit Casper, you are in nearly every Andy Murray fucking you tube page.I'm Scottish and while at first couldnt be botherd with him,i find myself now beginning to warm to him a bit.
YARROWS 2 years ago
Well thats good, you can now appreciate just the work Andy puts into make him as great as he is.
Good luck to him I say......I hope he does it........for him.
CASPER10666 2 years ago
@Lolz4lafs
But he is fucking boring to watch, Nadal is similar yet his game is the most spectacular in All of tennis
nickhockey96 1 year ago
@Lolz4lafs when you play that kind of game, zero championships
hgamer 10 months ago
@Lolz4lafs No, it's just pathetic to win a game on your openents errors instead of your good talent, simply pathetic. He makes the game about who can lose the less instead of who can win the most. That's why Murray will always be a second-class tennis player
PFloydism 9 months ago
@PFloydism Do you play tennis IN A PROFESSIONAL LEVEL? just shut tha f.u.c.k. up.
khurapic 9 months ago
@khurapic no, but federer and nadal do, and they are far better than Murray, Nadal due to his aggresive style and Federer due to his skillfull style. I have played tennis at an amateur level, competing in tournaments and I can assure you that anyone with a bit of skill can beat someone who plays like Murray, that's why Murray is so pathetic and will never win anything significant (or will be lucky if he does)
PFloydism 9 months ago
@PFloydism I totally agree! I hate his tennis!
panathageorge 9 months ago
@Lolz4lafs That's what Wozniacki does...yet she gets so much crap.
Top10TennisNetwork 8 months ago
@Top10TennisNetwork Are you comparing Murray's and Wozniacki's games ?
ownthelaws 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ownthelaws Obviously. Because what he said about Andy applies to Caroline..., "game is one of waiting not aggression so they just wait till their opponent slips up that's not pussy that's genius"
Top10TennisNetwork 7 months ago
@Lolz4lafs yep, it's pussy
skypekai 8 months ago
And, by the way, The talent not always coincides with results. Gaudio, for example is a very talented guy, but his mind is a shit. Coria was a faggot too. The merit of Federer is that he could match talent with regularly.
bragunovskoie 2 years ago
gasquet and nalbandian are more talented FUKING NOOBBBBBBBBB
tvvideos365 2 years ago
Please, I dont want to waste my time with a person who see tennis ocassionally.
bragunovskoie 2 years ago
@tvvideos365
Of course, Gasquet has been banned and won nothing of note for a couple of seasons. Nalbandians last tournament was being knocked out in the second round of the Australian Open. Of course their more talented....
MacHoodio 2 years ago
OF COURSE LMAO
tvvideos365 2 years ago
like federer, murray play´s tennis with a lot of ease..
reefric 2 years ago
Not that gr8 if you see some of Federer's shots!!!
Jaishankar100 2 years ago
hmmm, the shot was not that difficult, I give him props for actually thinking of doing that though.
gunshow1988 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
tit shit cum shot round and round the bend
gameguru31 2 years ago
??? EXTREMELY nice shot, but not genius. Come on, now. The word should be reserved for something absolutely extraordinary. This is an awesome shot but I've seen much crazier (Santoro's tweener lob against Spadea and Agassi's 'magic shot' vs. Corretja come to mind)
turdferguson2 2 years ago
genius is defined as someone who has exceptional ability and originality. in this rally murray shows both and on that basis he is a genius and the shot is genius. if it didn't take something special players like murray would be ten a penny, which they aren't, and you'd see similiar shots all the time, which you don't. many world-class (top 50) players are 'genius' and very capable of similiarly 'genius' shots. you usually don't get to the top of tennis otherwise. only my opinion, mind you.
fuglyno1 2 years ago
genius has nothing to do with crazy...the shot was simple and well thought of thats genius
tenniswh0re 2 years ago
genius???
djsewell 2 years ago
That´s called a Badminton Hit!
keijimuto 2 years ago 2
haha ya man, agree 100%
Illusion113 2 years ago
Wow tha't amazing, but I don't understand what's happened :D
I liked it
Andy Goooooooooo
you're really brilliant player
Good luck
Dulcelacrimosa 2 years ago 5
good one murray
harhog1234 3 years ago 5
LOL hi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
fadstar14 3 years ago
genius..? riiiiiiiiiite
ab786 3 years ago
that was genius right there i kinda laughed when i saw it! haha
tenniswh0re 3 years ago
Loved that shot, and he just kept running after it thats what made it so good.
Well done Andy, cant wait for 2009
CASPER10666 3 years ago
It is genius. The guy has so much natural talent. He makes the game look easy!
crackerass01 3 years ago
cassuality,but really good
efriiiin 3 years ago
lol that was pretty good
AznHylite 3 years ago
looked lucky to me
Zameta 3 years ago
Nothing lucky about it. It was genius. I think you're just biased.
LindyDRed 3 years ago
Not any less than you are...if it's genius, I'm Santa Barbara
lisek1989lisek1989 3 years ago
Well, hi then Santa Barbara. Anyone that is a fan of tennis would say that's a genius shot. I'm not biased. I would have said the same if ANY other player had hit that shot. The fact that it was Murray is irrelevant.
LindyDRed 3 years ago
lol ... nice one
greenberetta2001 3 years ago
Genius!
siy9cowboys 3 years ago