Added: 5 years ago
From: ZeroScam
Views: 137,268
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (115)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what a suprise idiots are arguing in the comments page . . .

  • this shit was REAL STUPID!!! and so R U!!

  • Is the fire-ly thing at 0:01 something made by the friction with the atmosphere?

    Ans since this seems like it's gonna be the 100th comment, I'm gonna write a simple message;

    We went to the moon, and there's enough proof to prove it, and it's mankind's greatest accomplishment!!

  • I feel like slamming the head of every conspiracy-nut into my wall over and over again and I shall not give a shit what others say.

  • when the first vcr was invented it cost $thousands now you can buy one for $30. What i am saying if the apollo stuff really got them to the moon after spending a fortune designing then it would be cheap to re do,so the only answer is Hoax.

  • >bigfist255 That is because VCRs were mass produced. That is how they were able to be made so cheaply. Saturn V rockets were precision-made vehicles made as needed for the missions, not mass-produced. Rockets are expensive. It costs nearly a man's weight in gold just to put a human in orbit. It's not something that is going to get cheaper any time soon.

  • @bigfist255 You are extremely uneducated. Can You massproduce Saturn V rockets to a cheap price? Why do the airlainers cost hundreds of millions? And they are used for decades. A moon-rocket is expended after one shot, and is as least as complicated as an airliner. Not to talk of the amount of fuel needed. It can NEVER be cheap to go to the Moon.

  • most of that money was spent on making and testing new product like the woman working in the bra factory sewing the space suits or the rocket fuel etc etc as for the 400,000 workers whats that prove none knew the whole picture,only the elite few knew.

  • @bigfist255 The reason we know people went to the moon is because as has already been suggested, half a million people worked on the damn project and the money was spent and the landings televised? Your President gets his cock sucked by an intern and you can't even keep THAT a secret? If you think the landings were faked and kept secret, then I expect Bill Clinton must be REAL pissed. Now, if anyone can present compelling evidence as to the truth of these alleged" secrecy" theories, go for it.

  • can someone tell me,if u.s.a went to the moon in 1969_72 why have they or no other country ever done it since?the answer can only be that it was a carfully planed hoax.

  • @bigfist255 -- Just because no other country has gone to the moon it has to be a hoax?

    hahahahaha!!!

    Have you no clue how expensive the project was?

    Example: India currently has a space program, right? The Apollo program cost (in 1960's dollars) about TEN TIMES India's current entire official military budget. (Not their space program ... their entire military)

    What "other country" could go to the moon?

    And that's why Congress hasn't sent them back.

  • @bigfist255 NASA is trying to get sustained space flight, (ISS) so they can go to Mars. (It would be 8 months one way.) If they can keep someone alive for 3+ years in space with no refuels/resupplies and they will start going again.

  • Just imagine what achievements are yet to come.

  • It's easier just to go to the damn moon than it is fake it.

  • This was taken durring 3rd stage jettison

  • plug007 & kamenliter I certainly agree with you. It is so certain the fact that we have been in the Moon, as the concept of death, (and the fact that we certainly are going one day to die) if I had to make such an extreme comparison, this would be the most appropriate. Now why the heck, to (still) remember and salute that magnificent day, if as many out there, they state that: "none of these ever happened".

  • 6 landings in a wafer thin lem? After the windows blew out and it was torn to shreds during testing no changes were made.fact.

  • @bigfist255 Yep, the LM was designed for use in low/no gravity and zero atmosphere. 

  • @bigfist255 -- You know those airplanes that everyone flys on every day?? Yes. The ones you see at the airports that carry millions of people.

    Well: They tear the wings off of those things. And then they make no changes. And then people fly on them. FACT

    Part of testing ANY structure in the entire aerospace industry is to see how much force you put on the thing before it breaks. Just because it is possible for something to be broken in a test does not mean it is not strong enough.

  • @bigfist255 Yup. It was made for the moon, no atmosphere, no air pressure, no drag, low gravity. If it survives a few seconds on earth it will do fine on the moon.

  • typical beliver"they went full stop".well listen to a radio talk show on here called lunar hoax its 16 parts open your mind.

  • Various conspiracy theories concerning the moon landings being fake are not credible and are full with inaccuracies and false information. It's ashame that they deny mankind's achievements and one history's most documented event.

  • They went to the moon full stop, I hate it when people deny they ever went!!

  • thats not during reentry your to far a way from the earth form that even to be close

  • @RocketLauncher965 Thats true

  • a man walked on the moon. fact. there were what 5 or 6 moon missions? they couldnt fake all and get away with it. they couldnt fake one and get away with it. you insult the men and women who got them there.

  • I want real Proof

  • You must be the proud owner of a Big Foot print cast!

  • @danrieke right just like the paper money you use is real

  • Yes, man walked on the moon! It's a historic, well-documented fact. I too witnessed the Apollo programs while growing up. Read Andrew Chaikin's "A Man on the Moon" -- one of the best, if not, the best detailed account of the Apollo project.

  • Awesome!

    I remember as a kid staying up all night with my dad watching all of the Apollo missions live on T.V. I wish I had been a tad older as to appreciate just what was happening. This makes one truly understand just how intelligent we humans are, and what we are capable of doing when we put our minds to work.

    How could anyone rate this less than 5 stars? More like 1,000,000 stars!

  • @MusicStudioTV

    2 words...

    Conspiracy Nutjobs.

  • appart from all thetop scientists....plus several mythbusters proved that it did happen

  • Nearly 1/2 million people involved in putting man on the moon, if it was faked I think it would be leaked by now. We put man on the moon, the single greatest achievement ever!

  • so much evidence against them.

    its stupid i dont know why they dont just hold there hands up agree and start spending america's tax money on something people will see that is truthful. regardless of what facts they have to tell regarding the smokescreen that is pulled. we will handle it we are human we can compute that shit.

    ¬1

  • I've said the exact same thing a thousand times. Bonafide conspiracies have a very short shelf life. People always come forward and spill the beans at some point. Just how could any government insure hundreds of thousands of technicians, engineers, administrants, lawyers, managers, project coordinaters, scientists, mathematicians, and oh yeah, a few astronuats all keep their mouths shut for 40 YEARS?

    Now as for 9/11, that's a different story...

  • @plug007 Not necessarily true, though I think we did go to the moon. All that was necessary was maybe 20 people know that the astronauts didn't go, not thousands. Everything could have been entirely real, except where they get in the rocket.

  • Almost true. The Russians and the Americans tracked the astronauts all the way to the moon, and citizens all over the globe tuned into transmissions from the spacecraft. If they weren't coming from the moon, someone would have cried "Fake"

    er... someone EDUCATED would have cried fake! ; )

  • WE?!

    YOU SAY WE?!

    WE DON'T DO ANYTHING!

  • @plug007 Well, said. Many hoaxers are young people who have only video and photos as their "total proof." The program was real, the launches were witnessed by millions; nothing that heavy has been launched by the US since then, the shuttle stack-up weighed 2 million pounds less! The science was examined by thousands of scientists and college professors around the world. Some unqualified nuts say it looks fake; they cite "total proof of a hoax," which makes those of us who know better laugh.

  • @charliegoodboy Hehe, I just laugh at the hoaxers as I think they are nuts. Im in my early twenties now, I always hope that they will put man on Mars and back to the moon in my lifetime. I would think the Chinese will go to the moon in 2020 maybe. Hopefully anyway. Peace out.

  • @plug007 No doubt the Chinese will send men to the moon in the next ten years. I am retired after nearly 40 years in aerospace and had the good fortune to meet Apollo and shuttle astronauts over the years; many of them got sweet jobs in aerospace. These guys are intelligent and accomplished, yet humble and reserved. Since you are only in your twenties, no doubt you should at least be able to get a ride into orbit by one one of the many space tourism ventures now in development. Good luck!

  • How can anyone in the year 2009 believe the moon landings were faked? Have they seen the footage? I'm sorry, but you couldn't have footage like that today that would look so real...and that was 1969!! It's so obvious it's real...anyone seen 2001, A Space Odyesey? That's the height of spfx technology from that era..and for some of the shots, it's a cut-out being filmed...and the models are clearly models...we landed on the moon, folks...a number of times...it's common sense.

  • The only people claiming we never landed on the moon are not technical-people, or teachers, or engineers. I watched the development of satellite-technology, and manned and unmanned space systems since 1963.

  • @Beamshipcaptain

    That would be awesome.

  • @kamenliter

    Because people are spoiled. Everything is luxury these days. If going to the moon is not as easy as buying a airline ticket to europe its for many ignorant types impossible to even dream about.

    People think they can do everything. Going to the moon everyday is not within our capability yet.

    And cause it isnt, we cant reproduce the same achievement for more then once.

    And because we didnt for over decades up to now, rocket flight to the moon is become such a small achievement

  • in history and in time (not for me but for others.)

    that many people try to conspire against it cause the vacancy of this achievement has never bene repeated itself and people cant handle, image or absorb that fact as for why that is.

    1st thing is that interplanetary travel will never be cheap, even the moon.

    And is not to be compared to cars,buses, or airplanes.

    Besides conventional stuff like planes and cars, money is spent on wars. And as long as we build Joint strike fighters

  • F22's Boeing bombers like the B52, Jumpjets, ACRs M4 Carbines tanks AC-130s Anti nuclear defence systems by laser sattelites. And all sorts of war related stuff, we will not go to the moon. We will not go to mars. And thats just pure and simply the reality as it is. Since i gave you the answer to the question (why dont we get back to the moon?) So I dont wish to see anymore senseless conspiracys anymore. Its very simple to believe. But harder to understand. Not for me luckily...
  • @kamenliter I know your comment is a year old, but I thought you should understand the other side:

    There is, surprisingly, what appears to be 100% solid evidence suggesting faking of photos on the moon, and even errors in some footage. Some of the photos don't match up with the videos, and some landscapes in some videos are completely incorrect.

    All that is real, but YES we went to the moon, and there is no conspiracy.

    The problem is simply that NASA released training vids & mockups as real.

  • @looncraz Cite your sources...

  • @CubesForAKid That would be a very time consuming process - though I thought about organizing the data at one point to try and show what actually happened.

    There are times when the lighting in the photos does not match the videos, the framing is incorrect, and in one instance the flag was turned the wrong way.

    There are also videos listed as official moon shots in which you can hear the astronauts talking about what is going on outside with bomb tests and what-not. Obviously training footage.

  • @looncraz Dude, cite your sources. None of what you say has any merit until your cite a source.

  • @CubesForAKid Meh, I have bigger fish to fry than showing just how disorganized NASA was when storing their tapes ( I mean they lost the Apollo tapes, how disorganized must they be?? ).

  • @looncraz Cite your source.

  • @CubesForAKid I've been nice enough: fuck off. I have a business to run.

  • @looncraz Yet again, cite your source.

  • The LRO recently took photos of the landing sites of the apollo's, check em' in the NASA site, and yeah we did landed on the moon.

  • All aound you... above the ground... below space... any questions?

  • gor069 don't ever tell your parents you think it was all faked they will be horrified and depressed at how stupid you are. So sad when parents find out their child is challenged.

  • His parents are as dumb as he is!! They only think that they are smart . Most stupid people think they are not stupid.

  • thus making them stupid

  • seems real to me, the cameras they had were not that good, focusing on stars would be impossible because the earth is so bright for the lens.

  • wow got any proof dumbass?

  • YOU are the dumbass

  • no because you have no proof. The landings were REAL. Anyone who denys it is a retard.

  • There is all kinds of proof that we landed on the moon

  • That was a little weird...

  • The stars are too faint to be seen. If they had opened up the iris of the camera enough to see the stars, then the Earth would have been overexposed.

  • This seems to be Trans Earth Injection, Apollo 11 is returning to Earth for reentry.

  • uhh...seems fake to me too...

  • not fake!

  • Well, the title means it is ABOUT to re-entry. fools.

  • re entery of what

  • orbit you retard

  • atmosphere?

  • Absolutely beautiful!

    :)

  • Eh, go tell the Pope there's no God. You'll be just as productive.

  • gimme a moment.

    This is not reentry...

    This footage is far away from that.

  • Beautiful , you can see day covering the night.very clear

  • oh, God, i wish i could go to space:D

  • why did someone give u a thumbs down? lmfao

  • check it out at 14 seconds... it looks as if the earth falls out of space!! weird.

  • lol

  • In space, outside of earth's atmosphere, you'd have to zoom out from the earth to see stars. Stars appear closer together on earth than they do in space...it shows you how truly vast space really is.

  • It is a vast space, it kinda reminds me of Nirvana (not the music band). Everytime I think about it all the problems we have down here on Earth look totally senseless.

  • Where's the stars in the background?

  • they were underexposed. that's no problem, if you think about it, IMO.

  • I have this continuing problem with the background stars... very few NASA shots show them. The odd one will, but few if any of the Moon shots.

    I've never taken a picture in space - I can't say what that picture would look like, especially with a 1970's film camera.

    I think I'll stop commenting and start researching.

  • This is where the conspiracy theorists show their ignorance. (not you ;-) They say lack of stars proves the shots were on a sound stage.

    The stars are too dim compared to objects being photographed. On the moon, it's being lit by the sun, WAY too bright to show dim stars. If you adjusted the exposure to get the stars, the scene in front would just be a blinding white blast.

    Same on earth. Even trying to get a pic of the moon, I lost the stars. Only during a lunar eclipse did I get stars.

  • the camera is set to let a cirtan amount of light in. the stars in relation to the earth, are very dim. to capture the amount of light for thestars to be visable, the earth would appear as a huge white spot.

  • it must be amazing to just stand back and view the whole planet in its entirety... everything that is happening on earth can bee seen, all you would need as a dam good magnifying glass.

  • Scary! I find all the outer space totally scary1!

  • Me too, reentry, though your hurtling towards home and a nice cup a tea, seems terrifying to me too. Still I'm facinated, only if someone else is in the screaming tube.

  • Well were surrounded by so you'll have to make the best of it.

  • Well were surrounded by so you'll have to make the best of it.

  • Home sweet home!

  • lol great

  • Spectacular!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more