@1982FMJ well i'm of pakistani descent but with all due respect it was ur government who called us guys over... so it's not exactly my fault that i was born here lol
The Waterloo and City line just looks like the Central line now without its distinctive blue colour, it's lost its identity, alot like the city is serves!
@1982FMJ at the time we were too busy invading the rest of the planet; its only later that we are getting a taste of what we did to others. Karma in action!
@1982FMJ far fewer than there were in the days of the Raj! Anyway, we were canny - we got locals to do as much of our mundane day to day work as possible.
the term 1992TS is only correct for 'today'... in BR days they were known as Class 482. This was because whilst they came off the same production line as the Central Line trains the different railway companies gave them different names.
@1982FMJ yeah.. but now i notice that a lot of high position jobs like doctors lawyers are held by different ethnicity they contribute to our economy....+ we went into there country for no reason....
@1982FMJ Not all immigrants are asylum seekers, you idiot. And asylum seekers don't especially come here to "scrounge" like those multi-million-making newspapers - who of course totally have the working man's best interests at heart - would have you believe.
Waterloo & city line is too small for jounrey. History Waterloo & South London railway toward South croydon. But now short of the jounrey between Bank and Waterloo with new trains. That is very interesting, how about future plan the Waterloo & South London line is?
@badboiant29 They are in a special 'Waterloo & City Line' livery and have now been repainted in standard London Underground red / white / blue colours.
@masteruploader1998 you are comparing a short line built over 100 years ago with a much larger system which dates from the 1960's.
Obviously you are proud of and have affection for your home city - this is only to be expected, most people are like that. However not everyone goes around making belittling comments on other people's cities and their transports just because they are different.
your name suggests you were born in 1998 & are a child aged 12. If so you've still got lots to learn!
I dont understand why people are complaining about no flash photos on the underground, its so the drivers dont get temp blinded by its obvious. Its just easier to keep the rule to the whole network if near trains or not as people would push the boundaries.
I think you mean that people should not complain about a ban on flashguns at subterranean stations, as its a safety hazard because it can temporarily blind train drivers therefore for reasons of safety the ban makes good sense; plus that the ban should really apply anywhere and everywhere near trains - not only below ground.
do they do colored lines AND color the train according to the colored line the branch is? MBTA is better in my oppinion. these trains are VERY cool too. i stick with my home train
Yes in Boston you name the various routes after the colours used to represent them on the system map, (eg: green, red, orange, blue, purple, silver) but whilst in London the different lines also use different colours on the system maps, we give them names, eg: Victoria, Central, Bakerloo, Jubilee, etc.
Another good video. Think when BR ordered the 482's, they should have ordered some for the Isle of Wight line, as much as I do like the 483's on the island.
yeah thanks but I'm not too sure but i think that the waterloo and city line in now in the proper underground colors and is now called the hamersmith and city line but thanks anyways daleksec53
sorry for taknig any of your time i am doing a survey to see how many people want the waterloo and city line extended anybody can join just replie yes or no thanks loads daleksec53
btw, at Bank a walkway to the DLR now blocks would could have been a logical link-up with the Northern City Line to Moorgate, so that the mainline trains which terminate at Platforms 9+10 could have been extended to Bank and Waterloo. Also, back in the 1980's the then new Network SouthEast wanted to add a midway station at Blackfriars... of course it never happened, otherwise it'd have opened by now.
pity TFL actually refurbished the livery on the Waterloo and City Line trains, the blue and white was much better than the corporate livery of LUL which is rather rubbish, silly LUL
I do NOT like graffiti on trains - and try to avoid it.
I once saw some metro trains in Rome, Italy where there was so much grafitti that it was almost impossible to see where the doors and windows were.
yuck.
I would prefer that artists paint scenes, cityscapes, countryside, seaside, etc. Grafitti is always brutally harsh and makes me think of terrorism, war, and other things which are not at all 'civilised'.
The waterloo & city line is like the london equivalent of the new york city times square grand central shuttle or probably the other way around since london's subway system is older.
If you want to be on a train with stuck up arrogant twats in business suits that look down the ends of their noses at you like your shit on the bottom of their shoe while pushing you aside to get the last seat, there's no finer line to go on in London than the Waterloo & City Line...
btw, despite usually being very wealthy these people are just as liklely to try fiddling their fares as the people at the opposite end of the 'wealth divide' who see articulated buses with their open boarding via any doorway as 'free' buses.
Oh, indeed. When I used to live in London, on many evenings when I was leaving my station there was someone being stopped for not having the correct ticket, usually someone in a suit.
History... when built its purpose was to link the mainline railway terminus station at Waterloo with the City of London, so that people who work in the City could use the mainline railway's services and not those of other railway companies.
It actually passes directly under Blackfriars station and the idea's been kicked around for decades to put a stop there as well. Nothing's ever come of it though.
WOW very good video! sends me a bit emotional, I remember seeing these on the W&C in the NSE livery when LU had it in that livery. I was shocked when they said it will go into LU corporate livery!
when I filmed this I knew what was about to happen - although it was quite a few years before corporate LU actually made it to these trains.
as with some of my films from Berlin and Essen, I filmed things which I knew would be of historical interest at some later date - although with the German cities I have regrets for not having filmed even more...
Actually these trains were built at the same time as the Central line trains, although it seems that some electrical differences (related to different signalling systems) prevent them from working on the Central Line.
However as there is no direct track connection so this does not really matter.
It's exactly the same train as the Central Line one. It runs under manual control as the line signalling is based on original BR spec for the line. The Central Line trains can run in manual or automatic mode, but a simple switch in the driving cab is all it takes to change the mode of operation. At least that's what I think......
but neither the shortest or longest distance between stations!
btw, in the early NSE days I recall a suggestion that a station should be added where the line passes near to Blackfriars station. However this did not happen - I assume that no-one could find a way to finance (pay for) this.
well if it happens it will only be from highgate to finsbury park they really don't want ally pally beacause they think it would have rubbish reciepts but they are wrong as loads of people would love to go there on the tube
In Berlin they were removed, only to be put up again at Western stations (for safety reasons apparently). Mr Erich Honecker (originally a Wessie) would have been pleased!
Network SouthEast has not existed for many years.
At the time of railway privatisation the govt. decided that since this was a tbe line which used trains that are virtually identical to others elsewhere on the London Underground so the line should become part of the London Underground, and not a mainline train operating company.
i know next to nothing about the W&C so im hoping i can understand this better. it seems the W&C was built in the time when there were competing railway outfits in London, thus giving rise to overly redundant station building, leading to the many station closures in london today. how is this line still running? it seems there are at least than 3 ways to get to bank from waterloo fairly easily other than this. it would seem more expensive to keep this up.
there my be several ways to get from Bank to Waterloo but at busy times the crowds are such that they are all needed / all very busy.
In Britain as a whole there has been too much rationlisation on the railways - if the closures of the 1960's had been less the roads would be less busy.
Hello, yes it was built when there were competing railway companies.
But there was very little overly redundant station buildings - not in London.
A lot of station closures in London were because of the 1939 - 1945 war especially in east London, where the bombing saw many people moving away. Some of these lines have since been reopened.
In north London some station closures were because after the war it was decided not to extend the Northern Line over routes served by steam trains. Buses were used instead - and now the areas are suffering from not having railway services.
...but it nearly happened! Electrification of the lines to Alexandra Palace, Edgware via Mill Hill and Finsbury Park was almost complete in 1940; platform lowering for tube stock was even carried out at some stations never to re-open as tube stations (Crouch End being one of them). A link to Finsbury Park from East Finchley could still be made as the line is still pretty much unobstructed; but it is unlikely that this will happen.
Hi Simon, I agree, it was a mistake to close the line. And what a shame! It was so close to being part of the Northern Line. With this and the proposed extension of the line from Edgware to Bushy Heath, has made the now discarded railways a fascination of 'what could have been'. But now we have Crossrail... Alex
The London Tube sucks. Nowhere to take a piss.
dirtydonki 7 months ago
@1982FMJ well i'm of pakistani descent but with all due respect it was ur government who called us guys over... so it's not exactly my fault that i was born here lol
sheru7mera7naam007 8 months ago
@sheru7mera7naam007.
Everything is in order and how it is supposed to be.
100 + years ago we Brits went around the globe, nowadays Karma sees people from around the planet coming here.
In the process we build a multicultural global village through which we all become stronger, and wiser.
Simon
citytransportinfo 7 months ago 5
@citytransportinfo when were these repainted from NSE livery to LU livery
Cazkumali 6 months ago
@citytransportinfo I wonder how many 1992TS trains they have on the W&C Line
Cazkumali 6 months ago
the train was so slow..
EvanC0912 10 months ago
it retains different colour moquette on the seats inside its trains, the seats still have their armrests and it has CCTV cameras inside its trains.
Also, I think that the trains are 'human driven' - unlike the Central Line where trains are driven by computers.
citytransportinfo 1 year ago
The Waterloo and City line just looks like the Central line now without its distinctive blue colour, it's lost its identity, alot like the city is serves!
ut91 1 year ago
notice how fewer immigrants you see on these old videos of london train stations. there were less asylum seekers back in the good old days of london.
1982FMJ 1 year ago
@1982FMJ at the time we were too busy invading the rest of the planet; its only later that we are getting a taste of what we did to others. Karma in action!
citytransportinfo 1 year ago 5
@citytransportinfo i disagree. how many brits actually live in india and pakistan
1982FMJ 1 year ago
@1982FMJ far fewer than there were in the days of the Raj! Anyway, we were canny - we got locals to do as much of our mundane day to day work as possible.
citytransportinfo 1 year ago
@citytransportinfo They were also known as Bombardier LU 1992TS
spartan117ism 3 months ago
@spartan117ism
the term 1992TS is only correct for 'today'... in BR days they were known as Class 482. This was because whilst they came off the same production line as the Central Line trains the different railway companies gave them different names.
Simon
citytransportinfo 3 months ago
@1982FMJ yeah.. but now i notice that a lot of high position jobs like doctors lawyers are held by different ethnicity they contribute to our economy....+ we went into there country for no reason....
frankliu532 10 months ago
@frankliu532 true, not to mention the fact that they tore it into two pieces... n e way what's done is done, it's in the past lol
sheru7mera7naam007 8 months ago
@1982FMJ Not all immigrants are asylum seekers, you idiot. And asylum seekers don't especially come here to "scrounge" like those multi-million-making newspapers - who of course totally have the working man's best interests at heart - would have you believe.
Yownanymous 10 months ago
3:06-
Tumbs Up
glitch4465 1 year ago
Isnt waterloo in France??
ocdp27 1 year ago
@ocdp27 Belgium
glitch4465 11 months ago
lloyds TSB. they take your taxes, and lend them back to you at a huge profit.?? wtf ??
rightfredsdead 1 year ago
The Waterloo and City Line was part of British Rail, then Network South East, now TfL
eltonator 1 year ago
Waterloo & city line is too small for jounrey. History Waterloo & South London railway toward South croydon. But now short of the jounrey between Bank and Waterloo with new trains. That is very interesting, how about future plan the Waterloo & South London line is?
ANDREWWALLFORD123 1 year ago
What company is the blue ones
badboiant29 1 year ago
@badboiant29 They are in a special 'Waterloo & City Line' livery and have now been repainted in standard London Underground red / white / blue colours.
Simon
citytransportinfo 1 year ago
i live in montreal in canada and i say tht this metro is suckish and montreals one is awsome ..so is tokyo's one
masteruploader1998 1 year ago
@masteruploader1998 you are comparing a short line built over 100 years ago with a much larger system which dates from the 1960's.
Obviously you are proud of and have affection for your home city - this is only to be expected, most people are like that. However not everyone goes around making belittling comments on other people's cities and their transports just because they are different.
your name suggests you were born in 1998 & are a child aged 12. If so you've still got lots to learn!
citytransportinfo 1 year ago 15
@citytransportinfo are they made form siemens
spartan117ism 1 year ago
London underground. At least it's useful. We have better freight trains. Yours are tacky.
minotaur878 1 year ago
@masteruploader1998 Without the London Underground, your metro may never of exisisted as the concept would of taken years to cath on to anyone else
glitch4465 1 year ago
@masteruploader1998
vlaka, London Underground is the best in the world.
unknownperson95 1 year ago
I dont understand why people are complaining about no flash photos on the underground, its so the drivers dont get temp blinded by its obvious. Its just easier to keep the rule to the whole network if near trains or not as people would push the boundaries.
mrwindytree 1 year ago
@mrwindytree
I think you mean that people should not complain about a ban on flashguns at subterranean stations, as its a safety hazard because it can temporarily blind train drivers therefore for reasons of safety the ban makes good sense; plus that the ban should really apply anywhere and everywhere near trains - not only below ground.
If so, then I agree!
Simon
citytransportinfo 1 year ago
the escalator ceilings from 0:19 to 0:42 looked much more presentable than in the 1st vid from 1989.
yaumatei1994 1 year ago
so i see dat the escalator roof has by then been refurbished and brightend up and with posters on it.
what a contrast from part 1 in 1989 where it was dim and soooo bare.
yaumatei1994 1 year ago
Was That As Fast As a Tey Travelled?
daleksec53 1 year ago
i luv this train and centrel and jublie and district
imyk2k9 1 year ago
THey should paint the outsides of the trains with the line color -- or at least with a single longitudinal color-coded stripe.
EdM021 1 year ago
lov waterloo
imyk2k9 1 year ago
do they do colored lines AND color the train according to the colored line the branch is? MBTA is better in my oppinion. these trains are VERY cool too. i stick with my home train
TheDylanJoyce 1 year ago
@TheDylanJoyce
Yes in Boston you name the various routes after the colours used to represent them on the system map, (eg: green, red, orange, blue, purple, silver) but whilst in London the different lines also use different colours on the system maps, we give them names, eg: Victoria, Central, Bakerloo, Jubilee, etc.
citytransportinfo 1 year ago
Nice, why the strange coulors? Like them though!, why are they bring red & white now?
HMSDaring1 1 year ago
@HMSDaring1
They were in Network SouthEast livery, but are now in standard LU livery (red / white / blue).
citytransportinfo 1 year ago
The station at 0:28 reminds me a bit of the Kyiv / Kiev metro, in particular to some point the "Arsenalna" station.
amiausUSA 1 year ago
@amiausUSA I've not been to Kyiv, and know very little about their metro.
citytransportinfo 1 year ago
they should go back to this colour
sexygirl1678 1 year ago
it is also a LU 1992 stock
spartan117ism 1 year ago
what type of whistle
TheBrett56 2 years ago
Nice to see the changes from your earlier W&C vid.
hellooldchap 2 years ago
i like this livery they should keep it
sexygirl1678 2 years ago 2
Pity they didn't. I think each train should have a livery respective to the line colour. Would make the tube nicer.
sim2lew 2 years ago 7
@sim2lew but think of the poor Bakerloo, it's unfortunately coloured already xD
XxMCR999MCRxX 1 year ago
btw, it's cityraildude. Learn to read user names propperly idiot
cityraildude 2 years ago
-propperly
-justn
-Preaty
-herad
-waterloon
Learn to spell properly idiot :P
Gazza2 2 years ago 5
Well, it justn says waterloo only! English & German use the same letters
cityraildude 2 years ago
thx
cityraildude 2 years ago
Preaty cool but annoying how u keep skipping, I'm from Australia so i never herad of this waterloon place. where is it London england orb germany?
cityraildude 2 years ago
england
bronzeonion 2 years ago
That in London, I plannig to go to Sydney myself from SF
Acetoeagle1 2 years ago
its waterloo
mcmotor101 2 years ago
Really? I figured that out Eienstine!!!! How is someone from Australia supposed to know nif waterloo is in England or Germany???????????
cityraildude 2 years ago
read the description! it says London Underground twice in it.
freako1234 2 years ago
well cityrail surely with all the writing on the trains being in english instead of german would that not give it away?
southarmaghdave 2 years ago 3
Very good video. Very interesting. I did not know that Network South East ran the line first.
unknownperson95 2 years ago
OH my.. it's blue. Mysterious, after only seeing red trains.
afkamistan 2 years ago
Another good video. Think when BR ordered the 482's, they should have ordered some for the Isle of Wight line, as much as I do like the 483's on the island.
SilsdenCougar 2 years ago
London Trains are very unique, nothing can look like them. That's why I like London Trains
tramrunner 2 years ago
Its nickname is "The Drain"
radioianj 2 years ago
hang on does the waterloo and city line still exist and is the waterloo and city line underground or network rail? plz awnser
daleksec53 2 years ago
yes it still exists, but since 1st April 1994 (I think thats the correct year) its been adminstered as part of the London Underground.
Prior to that it was part of BR's Southern Region, but with railway privatisation looming it was separated from the mainline railway.
I suppose its receiving new trains which were built as part of a larger batch for an Underground line was a factor in this change of ownership too.
Hope this helps.
Simon
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
yeah thanks but I'm not too sure but i think that the waterloo and city line in now in the proper underground colors and is now called the hamersmith and city line but thanks anyways daleksec53
daleksec53 2 years ago
No its not part of the hammersmith and city Line.
lukespencer91 2 years ago
na, don't worry i just asumed
daleksec53 2 years ago
sorry for taknig any of your time i am doing a survey to see how many people want the waterloo and city line extended anybody can join just replie yes or no thanks loads daleksec53
daleksec53 2 years ago
extended to where?
and how would it be funded?
Simon
btw, at Bank a walkway to the DLR now blocks would could have been a logical link-up with the Northern City Line to Moorgate, so that the mainline trains which terminate at Platforms 9+10 could have been extended to Bank and Waterloo. Also, back in the 1980's the then new Network SouthEast wanted to add a midway station at Blackfriars... of course it never happened, otherwise it'd have opened by now.
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
There is a station at Blackfriars, isnt there? One gettig built on the bridge at the moment.
emperorgrant 2 years ago
pity TFL actually refurbished the livery on the Waterloo and City Line trains, the blue and white was much better than the corporate livery of LUL which is rather rubbish, silly LUL
grahamf19 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I like graffiti on tube trains, do you have footage of graffiti on trains?
mercdriver2009 2 years ago
I do NOT like graffiti on trains - and try to avoid it.
I once saw some metro trains in Rome, Italy where there was so much grafitti that it was almost impossible to see where the doors and windows were.
yuck.
I would prefer that artists paint scenes, cityscapes, countryside, seaside, etc. Grafitti is always brutally harsh and makes me think of terrorism, war, and other things which are not at all 'civilised'.
Simon
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
you go man i hate graffiti especially on trains
caltrain2 2 years ago
further to my other comments, someone who does not have a login on youtube has asked me to ask you the following...
Simon
-------------------------
if they would like their living room redecorated unannounced
while they were out. Or for that matter have paint thrown over their car/ best
clothes.
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
Idiot
SilsdenCougar 2 years ago
The waterloo & city line is like the london equivalent of the new york city times square grand central shuttle or probably the other way around since london's subway system is older.
TRANZEURO 2 years ago
Thanks - I've never been to NYC so know very little about its transportation system.
Simon
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
Bet you wouldn't be allowed to flash a camcorder round on the underground or indeed any railway station these days.
The golden age of transport nerds is sadly over
trimmytrab 2 years ago
You are allowed if you don't use a flash or tripod.
WrongRoadRailways 2 years ago
Indeed hand held filming without flash is 'tolerated'.
But the W&C is one of teh few places where I can recall seeing signs saying that flshguns are prohibited.
Simon
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
If you want to be on a train with stuck up arrogant twats in business suits that look down the ends of their noses at you like your shit on the bottom of their shoe while pushing you aside to get the last seat, there's no finer line to go on in London than the Waterloo & City Line...
RabidRaccoonUK 2 years ago
also known as Bankers!
You are of course spot-on with that comment...
btw, despite usually being very wealthy these people are just as liklely to try fiddling their fares as the people at the opposite end of the 'wealth divide' who see articulated buses with their open boarding via any doorway as 'free' buses.
Simon
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
Oh, indeed. When I used to live in London, on many evenings when I was leaving my station there was someone being stopped for not having the correct ticket, usually someone in a suit.
RabidRaccoonUK 2 years ago
what did justin fox say that got his comment removed??? hes like a massive tube supporter
LigisdAodSmg 2 years ago
Sorry, no idea Justin removed the comment - not me.
Simon
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
does the drivers on the waterloo and city line driver trains on other lines as well ?
lukespencer91 2 years ago
i don't think so
GWRtom 2 years ago
Yes they drive the Central Line which uses the same tube stock.
hotpoint9534 2 years ago
Did you know that the train sequences of the film sliding doors were filmed on the Waterloo & City line?
justinfox955 2 years ago
Thanks - no I did not know that. I am surprised as normally Aldwych or the closed Jubilee platforms at Charing Cross are used for filming.
I've not see that film, so this may explain why I did not know this.
Simon
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
Comment removed
justinfox955 2 years ago
i think ato is rubbish at least the waterloo and city line isent ATO.
wangtong04 2 years ago 2
god working on that line must be boring! forwards backwards only stopping @ 2 stations all day long!
thetrainguy125 2 years ago 2
why does that only have 2 stations
5405easantiago 3 years ago
History... when built its purpose was to link the mainline railway terminus station at Waterloo with the City of London, so that people who work in the City could use the mainline railway's services and not those of other railway companies.
Simon
citytransportinfo 2 years ago
oh thats why its got two stations
5405easantiago 2 years ago 2
It actually passes directly under Blackfriars station and the idea's been kicked around for decades to put a stop there as well. Nothing's ever come of it though.
blaarp 2 years ago
how is the train blue thout there red lol
wee20ando08 3 years ago
huh?
nzseries1 3 years ago
Since I filmed this the trains have been repainted....
Now they are corporate London Underground colours. (red white blue)
S
citytransportinfo 3 years ago
This video was uploaded on my Birth date :D Great Video! I like it!
kyatisback12 3 years ago 3
Why do the platform and the train floor are not at the same level? Are there any engineer problems with this?
Thnx
kiteflyer82 3 years ago
most stations on most railways here in Britain have platforms and doors which are not level. Its how things were dane when the lines were built.
Simon
Simon
citytransportinfo 3 years ago
Did you know in 1986, BR sold the W & C line to London Underground. For £1! I'm not joking, look on wikipedia!
ButlerHarperBlakey 3 years ago 3
WOW very good video! sends me a bit emotional, I remember seeing these on the W&C in the NSE livery when LU had it in that livery. I was shocked when they said it will go into LU corporate livery!
james143611 3 years ago
Thanks.
when I filmed this I knew what was about to happen - although it was quite a few years before corporate LU actually made it to these trains.
as with some of my films from Berlin and Essen, I filmed things which I knew would be of historical interest at some later date - although with the German cities I have regrets for not having filmed even more...
Simon
citytransportinfo 3 years ago
This was filmed 4 days after I was born!!
shiningold321 3 years ago
puts me in my place!
and shows my age :-(
Simon ;-)
citytransportinfo 3 years ago
yay! same design as jubilee but blue!
jakethejuj56 3 years ago
Actually these trains were built at the same time as the Central line trains, although it seems that some electrical differences (related to different signalling systems) prevent them from working on the Central Line.
However as there is no direct track connection so this does not really matter.
Simon
citytransportinfo 3 years ago
It's exactly the same train as the Central Line one. It runs under manual control as the line signalling is based on original BR spec for the line. The Central Line trains can run in manual or automatic mode, but a simple switch in the driving cab is all it takes to change the mode of operation. At least that's what I think......
Mr6292 3 years ago 3
you mean Central
shiningold321 3 years ago
The Waterloo and City Line is... OPEN
What, were they expecting people to gasp in shock?
Yownanymous 3 years ago
good point - one never quite knows - maybe they were!!!
Simon
citytransportinfo 3 years ago
Shortest line on the tube
2 stations long lol.
danlfc1983 3 years ago
but neither the shortest or longest distance between stations!
btw, in the early NSE days I recall a suggestion that a station should be added where the line passes near to Blackfriars station. However this did not happen - I assume that no-one could find a way to finance (pay for) this.
Simon
citytransportinfo 3 years ago
well if it happens it will only be from highgate to finsbury park they really don't want ally pally beacause they think it would have rubbish reciepts but they are wrong as loads of people would love to go there on the tube
cameronmac2000 3 years ago
me, for instance!
Simon
citytransportinfo 3 years ago
CLASS 482 is indeed the TOPS classification
ashita100 4 years ago
Barriers
In Berlin they were removed, only to be put up again at Western stations (for safety reasons apparently). Mr Erich Honecker (originally a Wessie) would have been pleased!
RienkMebius 4 years ago
interedting!!thx
perrymak2000 4 years ago
Please excuse my ignorance but is class 482 a TOPS Classification.
fgh456pc 4 years ago
I think so, but am not 100% sure.
Simon
citytransportinfo 4 years ago
y is network southeast selling off all thire lines
infrared567 4 years ago
Network SouthEast has not existed for many years.
At the time of railway privatisation the govt. decided that since this was a tbe line which used trains that are virtually identical to others elsewhere on the London Underground so the line should become part of the London Underground, and not a mainline train operating company.
Simon
citytransportinfo 4 years ago
very interesting.
i know next to nothing about the W&C so im hoping i can understand this better. it seems the W&C was built in the time when there were competing railway outfits in London, thus giving rise to overly redundant station building, leading to the many station closures in london today. how is this line still running? it seems there are at least than 3 ways to get to bank from waterloo fairly easily other than this. it would seem more expensive to keep this up.
asulca593 4 years ago
there my be several ways to get from Bank to Waterloo but at busy times the crowds are such that they are all needed / all very busy.
In Britain as a whole there has been too much rationlisation on the railways - if the closures of the 1960's had been less the roads would be less busy.
Too late now - in many senses.
Soon all this might be underwater.
citytransportinfo 4 years ago
Hello, yes it was built when there were competing railway companies.
But there was very little overly redundant station buildings - not in London.
A lot of station closures in London were because of the 1939 - 1945 war especially in east London, where the bombing saw many people moving away. Some of these lines have since been reopened.
citytransportinfo 4 years ago
In north London some station closures were because after the war it was decided not to extend the Northern Line over routes served by steam trains. Buses were used instead - and now the areas are suffering from not having railway services.
citytransportinfo 4 years ago
...but it nearly happened! Electrification of the lines to Alexandra Palace, Edgware via Mill Hill and Finsbury Park was almost complete in 1940; platform lowering for tube stock was even carried out at some stations never to re-open as tube stations (Crouch End being one of them). A link to Finsbury Park from East Finchley could still be made as the line is still pretty much unobstructed; but it is unlikely that this will happen.
evadiendome 4 years ago 2
I know about the aborted Ally Pally scheme, and how places such as Muswell Hill now suffer chronic traffic congestion.
When the line was closed it was thought that buses could cope... BIG mistake.
Most of the route is now a parkland walkway and many locals will complain *very*loudly* if an attempt is made to convert it back to railway.
Simon
citytransportinfo 4 years ago
Hi Simon, I agree, it was a mistake to close the line. And what a shame! It was so close to being part of the Northern Line. With this and the proposed extension of the line from Edgware to Bushy Heath, has made the now discarded railways a fascination of 'what could have been'. But now we have Crossrail... Alex
evadiendome 4 years ago
Nice seeing the "then and now" clips, as it where. Interesting how some things have changed.
~Ra'akone
raakone 4 years ago