be a fucking human and be smarter that this .. there is no fuckig anyone land on Moon until now .. how a fuck all you are and i have a proved so many proved ..
July 28, 1952: USAF admits "flying saucers could possibly be spaceships from another planet". Googlenews archive, "air force orders saucers merry" click on "archive"
July 29, 1952: USAF orders pilots to shoot down flying saucers, do a google search for "flying saucer shoot air force".
April 7, 1952: Life magazine in cooperation with USAF claims that "no power plant known or projected on earth could account for the performance of these devices". Do a google search for "LIFE Apr 7, 1952" page 80.
@nano63a Only a few ppl will understand that ur comment is a lot more truthful than just about anything the govrnmnt tells them through the media. Ur correct but the bad thing is most dont even care anyways & thats so sad its actually scary.
@TheRebuiltOne1980 I think they've never watched a launch from Florida Cape Canaveral otherwise they knew that after 9 minutes you are out of fuel.And you only made 150 Km.Imagine traveling 400000 Km and Back with that toy (LEM) ???Ha,Ha,....
The beeps are from the VOICE ACTIVATED system they used so no one would have to physically "key" a microphone like the old CB radios. Why is everything a conspiracy to you loonies?
I understand what you're getting at... about the beeps and all. But what's are you trying to show other than the beeps occurring when things are entering and exiting the frame?
riiiight...All the PHDs who have studied the data from the Apollo program for decades have missed out on this, but you in your infinite wisdom see the truth. Good luck with that Wile E. Coyote, Super Dip Shit!
You are a dumb-ass!! Are you attempting to say we never put a man on the moon..? If so how did they fake the newest photos of the equipment we left on the moon.... Dumb Ass!
What exactly is the author on? this is complete and utter rubbish...
How can anyone thing it is more believable that NASA had an incredibly advanced digital (DIGITAL people!) video editing system that analysed frames in real time that was "decades" ahead of it's time than it is that NASA actually went to the moon with technology that was actually available at the time.
Also if this video editing system is so advanced surely they wouldn't have needed to leave the quindar tones in the audio....
@Karter16nz Maybe this document (made my Steven Greer and the Disclosure Project) might shed some light on just how advanced our technology is.
Also, Google "Lockheed Skunk Ben Rich". Click the first link.
Testimony from the Head of Lockheed Skunk Works (one of the biggest commercial US Military weapons producers) that we have superior advanced technology locked away in blacks gov't projects, purposely made unavailable to the public.
@Karter16nz - I share your curiosity as to why they left the audio tones in the video if it would reveal advanced and unknown technology, revealing that not everything they did on the moon was disclosed to the public.
However, there is no reason to dismiss the entire theory without trying to figure out both sides of the possible story. I personal believe that we have not been told all the reasons as to why we went to the moon, what type of technology we have developed and why?
Part 1 is less convincing. Every time a beep is heard, mission control is either starting or ending a voice transmission. Matching the official examination of these beeps by NASA.
However, in both videos you can see the ping's or the light reflecting on the thin cables used harness the astronauts to simulate moons gravity. watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE#t=1m30sec
We most likely landed on the moon, however some of the footage and NASA archives has clear evidence of tampering.
Doesn't it seem that when you are on the lunar surface you are moving much more slowly because of the gravity? Logically thinking, if you look at the footage it looks like time itself moves much slower on the moon than it does here on earth where all of our movements are much more fluid and faster. Just a thought that came to my head. Do you guys think that time slows down in out outer space? It would be almost like time travel in a way.
@scrubbycritter im pretty sure its because they are wearing those bulky ass suits, they weigh a shitload and they have little flexability, just a guess
ALL YOU DEBUNKERS THIS IS NOW WAR!!!!!!! IM FIGHTING YOU AND YOUR LIES, IM GOING TO KILL YOU WITH THE TRUTH, I PLEDGE THIS IS MY WORLD MINE! IM NOT GOING TO ALLOW, RETARDS THAT ARE SCARED TO SEE THE TRUTH BECAUSE THEIR MOMMY SAID ITS SWAMP GAS F*^% YOU!!!!! IM AMERICAN IN MY CONSTITUTION IT SAYS THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE SOMETHINGS WRONG, ALSO HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO ACT SO LIBERTY MAY BE PRESERVED! THIS IS WAR, YOU DEBUNKERS ARE WEAK YOUR HOLDING ON TO LIES. GL
What a load of Sh*t ....what about the pixel/light movement in the background surely something sophisticated enough to pick up astronauts would pick up the background changes. Or did NASA have the capacity to create settings that blocked the background out on the fly?
another thing @8 min the picture of the moon car= where are any tracks from the wheels anywhere in the frames-or does a 1/6 gravity of the earth mean vehicles dont leave prints but their moon boots do. just sayn-there's probably a simple answer an I'm just a public school drop-out. Answered my own ?. Peace
@6:54> asstronot n foreground does the magical cable pull me up to my feet and I'll do the bunny hop walk, whilst the asstronot n the back walks normally. I don't know whats going on exactly, but when you have organizations that are started by known occultist such as Jack Parsons & JPL(Jet Propulsion Lab) who was Aleister Crowley's boy & started a order of OTO & did the magical Babalon Working w/ L.Ron Hubbard(Scientology starter) somethings wrong w/this picture. Peace2All
I don't buy your explanation of the tones. I don't understand what is so evil about the tones or the advanced digital video editing (if it existed). If you are claiming the moon landings were faked. What does any of this prove? How is it evil?
There is a lot technology that our government hides and is still hiding from us. That it existed proves nothing. Watched all the videos and commented. Not understanding your point.
This is too funny...I thought the astronauts cursed allot, that's why they have those bleeps. The FCC does not like swearing on the Moon.
This is a similar phenomenon that happened when Percival Lowell looked at Mars thru' the telescope he bought with his Dad's money and saw canals, hence the start of the life on Mars myth.
this is a bunch of horseshit, there are lots of flims in which the tones to not sound when they enter and exit the frame. total garbage, no credibility, very stupid.
With all due respect, there is already enough false information coming from NASA concerning the *supposed* moon missions that all THIS does is to further confuse the true issues... Perhaps THAT is your true mission here!?
Is this a smoke screen? Way too much work has been applied here to be of passing interest...!?
The computers of the day was NOT capable of doing what you propose here. I know- I was there. Computer technology can only be divisible (secret and open) to only a small degree.
well it seems the objects come and go without beeps as well and other times you draw circles around them...common man..weakkkkk...to think the amount of effort you could have put into something helpful and not dis informing :(
the tones happen on the audio transmissions moron.you think it beeps when something enters or exits the frame? so they can edit alien shit that might walk thru the frame?the astronauts are right there to see that shit.stop putting black bars on the sides of the frame to make something outta nothing.
Your information regarding quindar tones is incorrect. There are several reasons why these tones were used but the main reason is it serves to notify capcom and the astronaut when the radio is available. Otherwise they would be talking over each other. It can get extremely difficult trying to communicate with a 3 second delay without the tones. That brings up my second issue. There is a 3 second delay. The audio was edited to omit the delay so your theory of talking over tones is moot.
PS you should know that this is NOT RAW FOOTAGE. it is edited fir public release. So the so call facts proclaimed are simply based upon edited footage.
Sorry but there was simply no technological advancement at the time to make this flame. It simply was the radio signal/channel activation deactivation when the individual spoke due to the limitation of the radio tech.
@TheMummysClub The soviets have always had a relationship with the USA. The soviets also faked and lied about many things, the US is aware of this deception too. Why dont the Russians rat on their 'enemy'? Simple. You dob on me ill dob on you. The Governments of the world are in control of our lives, none of them want to lose their grip.
Can't grasp what this video is trying to explain. The type of complicated video editing implied here is off the mark. Remember how antiquated computer processing was in those days. Just consider how easily the computer aboard the lunar module overloaded whilst descending Apollo 11. And projectile calculations are not supposed to be that complicated at all. Seems very doubtful there was the processing power to manipulate video like that.
@skylark8008@skylark8008 I'm no expert or anything just thought I would explain the purpose of the video pal ;) Oh and the author is an Alien believer so with that it is implied that we received or backwards engineered alien technology so it would be more advanced than recognized tech back then.With this system of recognizing objects entering the frame and having the ability to edit them out however they wish would be pointing out that they edited out Unidentified space anomalies aka UFOs
@NightIIIJester And I am telling you it was impossible to do digitally in 1969. Unless some doctored the video frame by frame by hand. The corresponding soundtracks matching would then also be very remote. Don't tell me they used "Alien" tech to carry out their mission. If Bob Lazaar (1989) was anything to go by, we understand jack about the subject. Whilst I don't discredit BL and those akin, I don't believe humans have the capacity to use it to advantage.
@skylark8008 Modern human technology is very fundamental in principal. Building over itself, repeatedly. Even the most complex things invented and made by man are simply a labyrinth of more simpler structures repeatedly built over itself. "Alien" tech, cf. Bob Lazaar UFO, on the other hand seems quite the opposite. Rather, "Alien" tech seems alot more simpler and direct, harnessing and addressing laws of nature on another fundamental level as yet unknown to us.
@skylark8008 It's not so simple as to borrow a UFO and take it for a Saturday night spin. There is a whole lot to do with understanding the principle of the background and associated methods before you can even contemplate reaching such a stage.
@skylark8008 Sigh......um I was just trying to answer your question as to the point of the video and THE AUTHOR's (aka not me) reasoning behind why such computer tech could exist. Sooooo sorry to be nice :(
The sole purpose of the Quindar tones was to mute the uplink audio to avoid annoying the astronauts when the Capcom had nothing to say. The tones were needed because the muting function had to be placed at the remote uplink transmitter to mute noise on the telephone circuit from Houston to the uplink transmitter as well as background noise in Mission Control. The astronauts didn't even hear the Quindar tones, as they were filtered out before transmission. -- Wikipedia.
Ah tis time that I shared with my fellow UN-believers information from the files of the Florida University Collective Knowledge NASA fraud study. According to adjunct professor Al Fredo, all gathered evidence points to massive fraud. "It's as if a problem child left to play with computer graphics came up with incoherent images only fools would accept." Indeed, those fools are the great American sheeple!
Ya lost me,.....there were all kinds of things comming in and out of frames that were not "beeped" ? this means nothing.Their just transmission signals.
Be careful arnold, if you criticize these bozos they will start calling you names and stating that you are
part of the NASA establishment trying to cover up years of lies and deceit. And if your spelling and grammar isn't perfect well then they will just label you as a retard. So tread softly my friend, criticize carefully, unless you enjoy the antics of the third grade playground bully.....his name is glink
What a crock, I am surprised so many of bafoons are falling for this guys bullshit, go watch ANY recent video of a shuttle launch, especially videos from inside the shuttle at the time of launch. The same "tone" happen EVERY TIME the the captain communicates with the ground crew. LunaCognita is a fraud and humongous douche-bag. You all believe 911 was an inside job too dont you.....incredible..
@fzappa007 You can always tell a NASA bootlicker. This one has the added quality of being a moronic "bafoon" who can't spell. At least we NASA lie detectors can spell "buffoon." Indeed, the word is spelled, once again, "buffoon." And furthermore, NASA moron, get the commas right in your last fragmented sentence. Finally, "dont" is really written as "don't."
By their moronic misspellings, ye shall know the NASA-ites. :)
@fzappa007 Alas, the most foolish of fools are those like you who don't realize they are fools. :) Indeed my moronic friend, grammar DOES count. On the positively negative side, it shows who the fools are by their very words and phrasing.
By the way, we never did go to the moon, except on gossamer wings: just one of those things. And that's once in a blue moon. Addio.
@fzappa007 lern 2 spel dumb shit moron. As we say in the old country, Jag anar ugg lor i mossen, sa lange. But you wouldn't know a foreign language because you are so retarded you can't master the King's English.
@Glinkaism1 You stupidly pathetically idiotically said,"It was Republicans who CAN make this a REPUBLIC. Hence the name "Republican." "
That is grammatically incorrect. So by your own words, "it shows who the fools are." See in English we have this thing called tense. You started in the past tense and switched to the present mid-sentence. Your second sentence has no predicate(ie it isn't a sentence)
your also wrong
Is the People's Republic of China a republic of the people fool!?!
@mstraney My word, we have the ms traney faggot telling us how to spell. HA! Go back to hiding the the closet.
The Al Zeimer Truth Center at the Sam Houston Institute of Technology continues to uncover NASA lies. Thus NASA's budget has been dramatically cut. Related good news on another government exploitation exposed an eliminated: the great State of Wisconsin had CUT the invading, parasite union, thus saving taxpayer money and jobs!
Let's break out the booze and have a ball! That's all!!!
@Glinkaism1 Your homophobia betrays you. It's okay that you're gay. You don't have to be ashamed and try to cover it up by projecting onto others. After all it is you who said: "That's why you see very few new musicals."(I bet you love show tunes), ""Everything is twickety-boo. Twickety-boo. Twickety-boo." Lyrics added in an old Danny Kaye movie called "Merry Andrew." "(I'm sure you think Danny Kaye is a real dream boat). You're so gay, not that there's anything wrong with that
@Glinkaism1 I didn't say anything about spelling, but I will take this opportunity to mention that you have the reading comprehension skills of a kindergartener. See tense has nothing to do with spelling, nor does the predicate subject relationship of a complete sentence. You attack someone for bad grammar, and your grammar is horrible. You accuse others for being gay, and you're probably gay. You criticize people as government leaches, well you probably get the picture by now.
The one thing that stood out for me was, I saw at least 2 objects hit the ground. One was even commentted on by the astronaut saying " it went into the hole" My understanding is that the moon has little to no gravity!
If we humans want to learn something from ourselves is the defect,that we have,thinking that we are always right and generations after gnerations learn that their ancestors were wrong and thought that something would be impossible to achive but the new generation see it as a common thing, our ancestors thought the world was flat they never even imagine that about half world was sitll hidden in our own world, having that as facts imagine what could be hidden in an universe we havent explore yet
If we humans want to learn something from ourselves is the defect,that we have,thinking that we are always right and generations after gnerations learn that their ancestors were wrong and thought that something would be impossible to achive but the new generation see it as a common thing, our ancestors thought the world was flat they never even imagine that about half world was sitll hidden in our own world, having that as facts imagine what could be hidden in an universe we havent explore yet
@sandmanffm yep I actually have a video that provens that it was real if u wanna see it u write down youtube : Mythbusters Moon Landing Hoax 5 HQ. after i saw this I sas absolutely 10000% sure its true. go ahead wach it :)
@TFSification NASA sucks?? really?? can please explain why they "suck" with-out using childish language, and only using REAL FACTS not conspiracy theories? bet you cant.
This is complete HORSESHIT, I bet Mr. LunaCognita also believes in a race of reptilian aliens masquerading as government officials lulling all us "sheeple" into hypnotic slavery so they can take over our planet......We went to the moon morons, get over your theories they dont add up.
@CT2507 What???Oh Really?? what language are you speaking?? listen dumb-fuck, if you are going to communicate using the English language, YOU MUST LEARN IT FIRST!!! You fucking MORON!! You are with out a doubt one of the most RETARDED blow-hards I have ever come across "marry a theory"???WTF??
please go away...you fucking tool,, "if so, why not" WTF?? You are an idiot....CASE CLOSED.
All of you want to believe the moon landings were a lie, because you yourselves can't achieve anything. Except maybe the next level of World of WarCraft. Get off your butts and go back to school. We went to the moon. Get over it already. This video doesn't prove shit.
@TheAdultChild101 ooh so we are jealous now cause we cant go to the moon ourself!? dont think so. i dont have time. u try and have 5 kids and 3 jobs!! why waste time to go to the moon? thats a silly argument. and i even have the new expansion for world of warcraft... whats your point!?
we didnt go to the moon and u cant prove it. prove it then!! u cant!
I noticed also that @3:56 NASA ground crew has to remind the astronaut, who *supposedly* is in direct sunlight, to put down his visor. Maybe the guy just didn't notice the super-glare burning out his eyeballs? :D
Such a system could never be ground controlled as the signal from the Moon to Earth takes 1.3 seconds (and 1.3 seconds back) so there should be pauses of 2.6 seconds everywhere. No such effect can be discovered.
True Free energy devices exist,But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
your absolute worth theory yet. nasa is evil but this is horse shit. a beep could never convey useful information about live video and the beeps coincide with them talking all the time. moron
@RobSellsTacos Well state them then using the video and then disprove them. What is being suggested is impossible just simply because of the computer power fact or the lack there of at the time. A 64K computer that is like an old commodore 64 game computer that was around like 20 so years ago and we are talking about the 60's so more then 40 years ago. But you just keep on NOT using your brain, thats fine.
idiots.....your beeps and astronauts entering and leaving frame don't even match up. What a bunch of loons.
Also...you look like a bigger fool by saying you have a confidential informant that worked on this project. Wouldn't it be easy just to "out" him on youtube and let the world know the landing was fake? "They" wouldn't dare kill him once his name was made public.
The funny thing bout this whole "moon landing" stuff is that the footage is taken in the "Area 51".. The place exists as we all know and therefore the it's 'closed' and forbidden to approach..
Now if you said the beeps were covering up something to do with aliens, than maybe this video would have been interesting! So what if the astronauts entred and left the cameras view.....................
The ONE thing "Moon Conspiracy Theorist" forget is that we were in a HUGE race with Russia to the moon. If there was ever even an inkling that we didn't go (they were listening in on all our transmissions), the Russians would have screamed and hollered at the top of their lungs. And there absolutley no way the Russians would have been "in" on the cover up!
at 6:45 look through the rover , you can see the system actually glitching out something (and is the only glitch in that clip), then as the camera continues to span , you see something semi-transparent running in the background .....................this whole video could have been explained just with that one clip ...6:42 to 6:53........look at the mountain range behind the rover !!!!!!!!!!!!
Damn! i thought those were just 'roger bleeps' from the cooms to let you know the astronaut had finished talking, but the sync is wrong, it DOES appear to be image related, but did they have this kind of computing power back in the 60's?
They probably had several ENIAC's working on it :)
If there is a genuine individual who played a direct role in manipulating this footage where is this individual, also where did they find this " Incredibly advanced video editing system" you claim was used to hide "the truth" Seems you have had too long with nothing worthwhile to do with your life but slag off NASA, the hundreds of technicians and the 12 men who were there and know the truth, ps im with you on this piggypolice
you actually got something technically wrong about your quindar theory. at 7:07, why doesnt it beep when he reentered the frame? your evidence has been clearly been de bunked. It is a disgrace if you are american and you are doubting your nations greatest pride. also explain why they would have those random beeps during Gemini, and earlier apollo missions.
LOL, the perps' dupes & propagandists must be really desperate to keep the 'Moon landing' lie from being exposed! Love the irony, more psyops to hide the psyops. Wouldn't matter *what* type of camera: the film & photographs alone ARE the proof they never left Earth's orbit. Good for laughs though: "advanced fibre optics" but only a tin can to get there -- through the Van Allen Belts w/ NO protection from deadly radiation etc. etc.. Yeah right, "to infinity & beyond" eh?
@JehanneDeLys Right on and well-said, as opposed to the illiterate NASA-its. They are history anyway. NASA is being dismantled, people fired and their shit auctioned off to real businessmen.
@Glinkaism1 Thanks mate :) Ah, literacy is a rarity & critical thinkers an endangered species. The deliberate dumbing down of the population, by govt "education" (indoctrination) systems over the past 50 yrs, is reaching critical mass — taught 'what' to think, not 'how' — by a new generation of illiterates!
"The people will believe what the media tells them they believe." -- George Orwell
@JehanneDeLys Right you are, matey. :) Schools have had to accommodate certain groups that didn't "beeleev in noh schoolin' cuz day aint noh jobz inywayz. Sheetman. Az yew kin planelee see, ahz kin rite."
Great quote from Orwell! Did you ever read his "Down and Out In London and Paris?" That was a harbinger of an even larger underclass, thanks to the dumbing-down of schools.
Time to put on some Elgar: In London Town Overture. :)
Also, it gets worse towards the end, where imagination is stretched to signify object contact and relocation. Beep tones are not consistent with each occurrence, and some occurrence are not marked. What I see is paranoia, and far stretching of coincidence to support a theory which otherwise has no supporting evidence. I have watched a dozen of these vids, and none of them conclusively support the accusation that the moon landing was staged.
the point here is not to debunk the moon landings,the point of the maker of video is that they got there,but was something there first,and nasa had the power to change the video picture,colour,filtering,etc,everytime a object entered the FOV,taking this way precaution measures for the eventuality of some Anomalous enter the cam FOV
@singularityforsure It is pretty clear that the purpose is to try and "prove" NASA is lying, putting under question the entire program and its legitimacy. As you must know, there is an underground claiming the moon landing never happened, and they use claims like this to support their arguments.
@EletrikRidesAgain I know that theory also,and in my humble opinion,nasa is hiding a great amount of info,my post was to make clear the intention of the video maker.
@singularityforsure I guess then I really don't get the gist of the point trying to be made. Why would NASA lie and if they did, why does it matter? Alien detection? I just don't see the big deal - even if the claim was true which it clearly is not based on the clips referenced as I have discussed.
I have analysed carefully the clips featured here. Contrary to your own claims, the beeps do not repeatedly coincide with FOV exits and entrances. There are times when beeps are heard where there are no changes in FOV. And the "detection" sensitivity is not constant. There are 2 beep tone frequencies and they do not repeatedly coincide with entry and exit. My conclusion: out of 1000's of beeps, you found some coincidence that are not even repeatable to support this theory.
This has got to be one of the most stupid ''hoaxtard'' videos I've ever seen. Quindar tones are in no way connected to video editing, they were simply tones to switch voice transmissions on and off. The tones could be heard throughout every mission whether or not filming was taking place. Anyone who believes this bullshit is an idiot.
Very interesting information. I see the usefullness of such a system and i wouldn't be surprised if this were to be true. But what i don't get is, why do we (the public) "have" to hear these tones? I mean, if the images are being analysed here on earth in a live feed by a computer to automaticly filter out undesirables, why did they make it give a beep everytime it detected something, if their intention is to keep the system a secret? Where's the logic there?
Ok, so you got a bunch of bleeps out of a kazilion of bleeps coincidentally bleeping at the moment something visually happens considering something visually is happening all the time. Cool, that means you proved, well, jack-shit.
What is more concerning is the fact that Nasa still hides some very sensitive data such as footages, videos of former ruins on the lunar surface...
There is something on the Moon and it is so fucking important that some people see the Kennedy Assassination as a result of that secret agenda, who knows?
The flashing strings attached to the backpacks catch more my attention, but hey... what do I know... I'm convinced we landed on the moon, as much as I'm convinced they would not broadcast that live. (too many things could have gone wrong) If I were them, I would have sent probes, film the physics and then stage it accordingly to baffle the russians. But, hey... sure. They might have had balls of steel and risk their national heros crashing in front of the world. Live. Sure.
interesting..but difficult thesis to fully accept. I am very skeptical by nature having spent years as a pro illusionist. I find the official NASA story contains amazing amounts of questionable data but so too do so many conspiracy theories. I remain skeptical but open-minded GOOGLE: JOHN LEAR Moon Mining ~a~
@jib1000 the art of illusion shows the fallibility of perception.. my point was not about who trumps who at all.. my point is that when one learns how to deceive one realizes how easy it is to pull off a deception. Thus since things seemingly apparent in reality may indeed be only one perception OF reality and not ness. proof.. A skeptic questions all things.. Thus I am skeptical.. I reread my last statement and cannot understand why even question it..???
If the moon landing is fake, why could amateur astronomers and universities see the lander on the moon? You can buy a telescope now that will let you see the rover tracks, and the parts of the lander that stayed behind. Hundreds of non-governmental telescopes could see the lander while it was up there and could see the astronauts in the lunar rover.
Get an education before you try to tell people lies.
@jib1000- scwtrials- REALLY? I've been looking for years. Books, magazines, universities, Mt. Palomar, Mt. Wilson,& Griffith Observ. & NOBODY SEEMS TO HAVE ANY PICTURES ! The GREATEST SINGLE ACHIVEMENT of the last CENTURY, & not 1 of these OBSERVATORIES has a SINGLE PICTURE ! Perhaps you could POST those PICS with the NAME of noted AMATURE or EXPERT so we can ALL SEE WHAT WE'VE BEEN MISSING ! THANKS, WE'LL BE WAITING !
@scwtrials Um...why would i need a picture? Perhaps you can't read well? YOU CAN SEE THEM RIGHT NOW WITH A TELESCOPE!!!!! Any pictures i post you will only claim are faked. GO LOOK WITH YOU OWN EYES DUMMY! I've seen all these things with ny own eyes. I saw the lander with my own eyes in the 80's. I saw the lander tracks (better telescope) in the late 90's. Go use your own eyes and your own telescope (or a friends) so you can't claim that anyone is faking. Isn't that what science is?
Come on! Of course they lied and contine to lie about many things, and of course they always had technology ahead of the time. But this video is just laughable. Why the fuck would they transmit an AUDIO signal when the VIDEO software detected something?
Don't get me wrong, I am a conspiracy theorist to the core, but this is just lame!
As Opie says, what does that prove? And the lie is about what?
This aint prove of.. whatever you where trying to prove.. Its just framesounds, it could mean anything, like simple signal sounds when the astronaut enters the monitor, could even be on purpose..
if you believe we spent money..us greedy Americans on a space program to actually get to the moon and further educate the people about the great unknown outer space..and if you think the government actually was more interested in going to the moon than money and power...than you are blind.this was a low cost film paid by tax payers that lead Americans into a world of war and pride. why? the amount of people who wanted to go to war increased as did the fear of other nations after this happened.
The truth was, is and will be the following ..
be a fucking human and be smarter that this .. there is no fuckig anyone land on Moon until now .. how a fuck all you are and i have a proved so many proved ..
00shhs00 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
July 28, 1952: USAF admits "flying saucers could possibly be spaceships from another planet". Googlenews archive, "air force orders saucers merry" click on "archive"
July 29, 1952: USAF orders pilots to shoot down flying saucers, do a google search for "flying saucer shoot air force".
April 7, 1952: Life magazine in cooperation with USAF claims that "no power plant known or projected on earth could account for the performance of these devices". Do a google search for "LIFE Apr 7, 1952" page 80.
QFT2 1 month ago
Everybody knows that Apollo's missions were fake.That's not funny anymore.No man ever passed 400 Km from ground and that's a FACT .Peace.
nano63a 1 month ago
@nano63a Only a few ppl will understand that ur comment is a lot more truthful than just about anything the govrnmnt tells them through the media. Ur correct but the bad thing is most dont even care anyways & thats so sad its actually scary.
TheRebuiltOne1980 2 weeks ago
@TheRebuiltOne1980 I think they've never watched a launch from Florida Cape Canaveral otherwise they knew that after 9 minutes you are out of fuel.And you only made 150 Km.Imagine traveling 400000 Km and Back with that toy (LEM) ???Ha,Ha,....
nano63a 2 weeks ago
What a waste of time, that's not fact at all. Bad evidence
darthgabriel97 2 months ago
The beeps are from the VOICE ACTIVATED system they used so no one would have to physically "key" a microphone like the old CB radios. Why is everything a conspiracy to you loonies?
Mozart1220 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you like aliens and hybrids, you may like my shifter evolutions saga, books 1-6. A shifter-alien ancient race invades Earth.
amiblackwelder.blogspot.com
amiblackwelder 4 months ago
did anyone see the sitck standing on the back of the guy
on 7:04
isiahtienda9 5 months ago
I understand what you're getting at... about the beeps and all. But what's are you trying to show other than the beeps occurring when things are entering and exiting the frame?
Jalsemgeest 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
riiiight...All the PHDs who have studied the data from the Apollo program for decades have missed out on this, but you in your infinite wisdom see the truth. Good luck with that Wile E. Coyote, Super Dip Shit!
TheFACTSRUS 6 months ago 2
@daybertful I love it! Lol
Like you said, "yestupido"! Nice one!
PonyCarRacer 6 months ago
luna cognita eres luna cagonita xd q ignorante y estupido eres
daybertful 6 months ago
You are a dumb-ass!! Are you attempting to say we never put a man on the moon..? If so how did they fake the newest photos of the equipment we left on the moon.... Dumb Ass!
PonyCarRacer 6 months ago
@PonyCarRacer
Yes, they also faked them!
hunchbacked 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i may the weirdest ufo video ever on my page
smilano87 6 months ago
hahaha thanks sir
hcsuarnefeiT 6 months ago
What exactly is the author on? this is complete and utter rubbish...
How can anyone thing it is more believable that NASA had an incredibly advanced digital (DIGITAL people!) video editing system that analysed frames in real time that was "decades" ahead of it's time than it is that NASA actually went to the moon with technology that was actually available at the time.
Also if this video editing system is so advanced surely they wouldn't have needed to leave the quindar tones in the audio....
Karter16nz 7 months ago
@Karter16nz I agree with you
JustSkateNoHate 6 months ago
@Karter16nz Maybe this document (made my Steven Greer and the Disclosure Project) might shed some light on just how advanced our technology is.
Also, Google "Lockheed Skunk Ben Rich". Click the first link.
Testimony from the Head of Lockheed Skunk Works (one of the biggest commercial US Military weapons producers) that we have superior advanced technology locked away in blacks gov't projects, purposely made unavailable to the public.
sianwin 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Karter16nz Here's the link for the first document: tinyurl (DOT) com/3dg5s4m
sianwin 4 months ago
@Karter16nz
Technology which was available at the time?
You have no idea of the difficulties involved in the moon landing!
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@Karter16nz - I share your curiosity as to why they left the audio tones in the video if it would reveal advanced and unknown technology, revealing that not everything they did on the moon was disclosed to the public.
However, there is no reason to dismiss the entire theory without trying to figure out both sides of the possible story. I personal believe that we have not been told all the reasons as to why we went to the moon, what type of technology we have developed and why?
stiki123 3 months ago
Part 1 is less convincing. Every time a beep is heard, mission control is either starting or ending a voice transmission. Matching the official examination of these beeps by NASA.
However, in both videos you can see the ping's or the light reflecting on the thin cables used harness the astronauts to simulate moons gravity. watch?v=wdMvQTNLaUE#t=1m30sec
We most likely landed on the moon, however some of the footage and NASA archives has clear evidence of tampering.
stiki123 3 months ago
Doesn't it seem that when you are on the lunar surface you are moving much more slowly because of the gravity? Logically thinking, if you look at the footage it looks like time itself moves much slower on the moon than it does here on earth where all of our movements are much more fluid and faster. Just a thought that came to my head. Do you guys think that time slows down in out outer space? It would be almost like time travel in a way.
scrubbycritter 7 months ago
@scrubbycritter im pretty sure its because they are wearing those bulky ass suits, they weigh a shitload and they have little flexability, just a guess
Grafdiesel 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL YOU DEBUNKERS THIS IS NOW WAR!!!!!!! IM FIGHTING YOU AND YOUR LIES, IM GOING TO KILL YOU WITH THE TRUTH, I PLEDGE THIS IS MY WORLD MINE! IM NOT GOING TO ALLOW, RETARDS THAT ARE SCARED TO SEE THE TRUTH BECAUSE THEIR MOMMY SAID ITS SWAMP GAS F*^% YOU!!!!! IM AMERICAN IN MY CONSTITUTION IT SAYS THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE SOMETHINGS WRONG, ALSO HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO ACT SO LIBERTY MAY BE PRESERVED! THIS IS WAR, YOU DEBUNKERS ARE WEAK YOUR HOLDING ON TO LIES. GL
geovs20 7 months ago
Maybe Im stupid but I have no idea why nasa would doctor the audio. What for?
jamesgambino 7 months ago
It was a tracking beakon
galacticSavior 7 months ago
What a load of Sh*t ....what about the pixel/light movement in the background surely something sophisticated enough to pick up astronauts would pick up the background changes. Or did NASA have the capacity to create settings that blocked the background out on the fly?
lukeo25 8 months ago
50000000000000000000000000000000* stars
72kryos 8 months ago
Yes, and on Saturday was the end of the world
film380 8 months ago
another thing @8 min the picture of the moon car= where are any tracks from the wheels anywhere in the frames-or does a 1/6 gravity of the earth mean vehicles dont leave prints but their moon boots do. just sayn-there's probably a simple answer an I'm just a public school drop-out. Answered my own ?. Peace
JimmyCarol100 8 months ago
@JimmyCarol100 research it yourself. Type that same question in Goole, and im sure you'll get plenty of answers. Good question though! =)
MrRoryborialis 7 months ago
@6:54> asstronot n foreground does the magical cable pull me up to my feet and I'll do the bunny hop walk, whilst the asstronot n the back walks normally. I don't know whats going on exactly, but when you have organizations that are started by known occultist such as Jack Parsons & JPL(Jet Propulsion Lab) who was Aleister Crowley's boy & started a order of OTO & did the magical Babalon Working w/ L.Ron Hubbard(Scientology starter) somethings wrong w/this picture. Peace2All
JimmyCarol100 8 months ago
дурилка?
valery431 8 months ago
I don't buy your explanation of the tones. I don't understand what is so evil about the tones or the advanced digital video editing (if it existed). If you are claiming the moon landings were faked. What does any of this prove? How is it evil?
There is a lot technology that our government hides and is still hiding from us. That it existed proves nothing. Watched all the videos and commented. Not understanding your point.
lonegull 8 months ago
They realy go to the moon but somthing goes wrong in the moon and they made this movies
MrWarlisson 8 months ago
What's name of this soundtrack?
metal87power 9 months ago
This is too funny...I thought the astronauts cursed allot, that's why they have those bleeps. The FCC does not like swearing on the Moon.
This is a similar phenomenon that happened when Percival Lowell looked at Mars thru' the telescope he bought with his Dad's money and saw canals, hence the start of the life on Mars myth.
Tweekerhead 9 months ago
So why didn't they just get rid of the bleeps?
321bytor 9 months ago 2
this is a bunch of horseshit, there are lots of flims in which the tones to not sound when they enter and exit the frame. total garbage, no credibility, very stupid.
MrToiletface 9 months ago
With all due respect, there is already enough false information coming from NASA concerning the *supposed* moon missions that all THIS does is to further confuse the true issues... Perhaps THAT is your true mission here!?
Is this a smoke screen? Way too much work has been applied here to be of passing interest...!?
The computers of the day was NOT capable of doing what you propose here. I know- I was there. Computer technology can only be divisible (secret and open) to only a small degree.
Surevival 9 months ago
héhè_ì_sïgñéd_üp_åt_fûll_tïlt_pôker
_üsìng_rèférràl_códé:_YoU600_äñd_göt_ä_600_Ðòllar_bôñüs
ebonypopes545 10 months ago
well it seems the objects come and go without beeps as well and other times you draw circles around them...common man..weakkkkk...to think the amount of effort you could have put into something helpful and not dis informing :(
zackertack 10 months ago
this is so freaking far out if You ask me. The moon landings was 40 years ago. Things were recorded on tape and film and there were no computers.
FrekeOne 10 months ago
the tones happen on the audio transmissions moron.you think it beeps when something enters or exits the frame? so they can edit alien shit that might walk thru the frame?the astronauts are right there to see that shit.stop putting black bars on the sides of the frame to make something outta nothing.
zambot3 10 months ago
Your information regarding quindar tones is incorrect. There are several reasons why these tones were used but the main reason is it serves to notify capcom and the astronaut when the radio is available. Otherwise they would be talking over each other. It can get extremely difficult trying to communicate with a 3 second delay without the tones. That brings up my second issue. There is a 3 second delay. The audio was edited to omit the delay so your theory of talking over tones is moot.
ElGatoLoco698 10 months ago
PS you should know that this is NOT RAW FOOTAGE. it is edited fir public release. So the so call facts proclaimed are simply based upon edited footage.
ThexBorg 10 months ago
Claim not 'flame'
ThexBorg 10 months ago
Sorry but there was simply no technological advancement at the time to make this flame. It simply was the radio signal/channel activation deactivation when the individual spoke due to the limitation of the radio tech.
ThexBorg 10 months ago
For all those who still believe the moon landings were a lie by the Americans, think about this:
The Russians also has similar technology and had the Americans 'lied' about the moon missions, they would have been the first to expose the lie.
I don't recall ever hearing the Russians dismiss the moon landings...
TheMummysClub 10 months ago
@TheMummysClub The soviets have always had a relationship with the USA. The soviets also faked and lied about many things, the US is aware of this deception too. Why dont the Russians rat on their 'enemy'? Simple. You dob on me ill dob on you. The Governments of the world are in control of our lives, none of them want to lose their grip.
kaderoder 10 months ago
Can't grasp what this video is trying to explain. The type of complicated video editing implied here is off the mark. Remember how antiquated computer processing was in those days. Just consider how easily the computer aboard the lunar module overloaded whilst descending Apollo 11. And projectile calculations are not supposed to be that complicated at all. Seems very doubtful there was the processing power to manipulate video like that.
skylark8008 11 months ago
Comment removed
NightIIIJester 10 months ago
@skylark8008 @skylark8008 I'm no expert or anything just thought I would explain the purpose of the video pal ;) Oh and the author is an Alien believer so with that it is implied that we received or backwards engineered alien technology so it would be more advanced than recognized tech back then.With this system of recognizing objects entering the frame and having the ability to edit them out however they wish would be pointing out that they edited out Unidentified space anomalies aka UFOs
NightIIIJester 10 months ago
@NightIIIJester And I am telling you it was impossible to do digitally in 1969. Unless some doctored the video frame by frame by hand. The corresponding soundtracks matching would then also be very remote. Don't tell me they used "Alien" tech to carry out their mission. If Bob Lazaar (1989) was anything to go by, we understand jack about the subject. Whilst I don't discredit BL and those akin, I don't believe humans have the capacity to use it to advantage.
skylark8008 10 months ago
@skylark8008 Modern human technology is very fundamental in principal. Building over itself, repeatedly. Even the most complex things invented and made by man are simply a labyrinth of more simpler structures repeatedly built over itself. "Alien" tech, cf. Bob Lazaar UFO, on the other hand seems quite the opposite. Rather, "Alien" tech seems alot more simpler and direct, harnessing and addressing laws of nature on another fundamental level as yet unknown to us.
skylark8008 10 months ago
@skylark8008 It's not so simple as to borrow a UFO and take it for a Saturday night spin. There is a whole lot to do with understanding the principle of the background and associated methods before you can even contemplate reaching such a stage.
skylark8008 10 months ago
@skylark8008 Sigh......um I was just trying to answer your question as to the point of the video and THE AUTHOR's (aka not me) reasoning behind why such computer tech could exist. Sooooo sorry to be nice :(
NightIIIJester 10 months ago
The sole purpose of the Quindar tones was to mute the uplink audio to avoid annoying the astronauts when the Capcom had nothing to say. The tones were needed because the muting function had to be placed at the remote uplink transmitter to mute noise on the telephone circuit from Houston to the uplink transmitter as well as background noise in Mission Control. The astronauts didn't even hear the Quindar tones, as they were filtered out before transmission. -- Wikipedia.
Purpleplanetar17 11 months ago
Ah tis time that I shared with my fellow UN-believers information from the files of the Florida University Collective Knowledge NASA fraud study. According to adjunct professor Al Fredo, all gathered evidence points to massive fraud. "It's as if a problem child left to play with computer graphics came up with incoherent images only fools would accept." Indeed, those fools are the great American sheeple!
Glinkaism1 11 months ago
Comment removed
fzappa007 11 months ago
Comment removed
fzappa007 11 months ago
Ya lost me,.....there were all kinds of things comming in and out of frames that were not "beeped" ? this means nothing.Their just transmission signals.
arnoldskit 11 months ago
@arnoldskit
Be careful arnold, if you criticize these bozos they will start calling you names and stating that you are
part of the NASA establishment trying to cover up years of lies and deceit. And if your spelling and grammar isn't perfect well then they will just label you as a retard. So tread softly my friend, criticize carefully, unless you enjoy the antics of the third grade playground bully.....his name is glink
fzappa007 11 months ago
I saw a UFO and today there are officially no UFOs. So if there is already a lie, why not here? Maybe someone really is on the moon.
UfoYes2 11 months ago
@7:04-7:05 what is this on top on backpack ? this light ?
michalcbr 11 months ago
What a crock, I am surprised so many of bafoons are falling for this guys bullshit, go watch ANY recent video of a shuttle launch, especially videos from inside the shuttle at the time of launch. The same "tone" happen EVERY TIME the the captain communicates with the ground crew. LunaCognita is a fraud and humongous douche-bag. You all believe 911 was an inside job too dont you.....incredible..
fzappa007 1 year ago
@fzappa007 You can always tell a NASA bootlicker. This one has the added quality of being a moronic "bafoon" who can't spell. At least we NASA lie detectors can spell "buffoon." Indeed, the word is spelled, once again, "buffoon." And furthermore, NASA moron, get the commas right in your last fragmented sentence. Finally, "dont" is really written as "don't."
By their moronic misspellings, ye shall know the NASA-ites. :)
Glinkaism1 11 months ago
@Glinkaism1
You're kidding right? Is that the best you've got? Giving me shit about my spelling?
Why,because I did not insert an apostrophe in a word and tossed out a few commas?
You are an ass and have way to much time on your hands. Getting that bent over my grammar
in a stupid comment section on you-tube, really? how old are you? twelve?
Put down the key board and go outside and play with the other children, the adults will
call you when its time to come in. what a douche-bag.
fzappa007 11 months ago
@fzappa007 Alas, the most foolish of fools are those like you who don't realize they are fools. :) Indeed my moronic friend, grammar DOES count. On the positively negative side, it shows who the fools are by their very words and phrasing.
By the way, we never did go to the moon, except on gossamer wings: just one of those things. And that's once in a blue moon. Addio.
Glinkaism1 11 months ago
@Glinkaism1 what a pompous ass, and you call me a fool.
fzappa007 11 months ago
@fzappa007 lern 2 spel dumb shit moron. As we say in the old country, Jag anar ugg lor i mossen, sa lange. But you wouldn't know a foreign language because you are so retarded you can't master the King's English.
Glinkaism1 11 months ago
@Glinkaism1 Like I said before, you are a pompous ass, and you can take "the kings english" and shove it...
pompous |ˈpämpəs |
adjective
affectedly and irritatingly grand, solemn, or self-important : a pompous ass who pretends he knows everything.
fzappa007 11 months ago
@Glinkaism1 You stupidly pathetically idiotically said,"It was Republicans who CAN make this a REPUBLIC. Hence the name "Republican." "
That is grammatically incorrect. So by your own words, "it shows who the fools are." See in English we have this thing called tense. You started in the past tense and switched to the present mid-sentence. Your second sentence has no predicate(ie it isn't a sentence)
your also wrong
Is the People's Republic of China a republic of the people fool!?!
mstraney 11 months ago
@mstraney My word, we have the ms traney faggot telling us how to spell. HA! Go back to hiding the the closet.
The Al Zeimer Truth Center at the Sam Houston Institute of Technology continues to uncover NASA lies. Thus NASA's budget has been dramatically cut. Related good news on another government exploitation exposed an eliminated: the great State of Wisconsin had CUT the invading, parasite union, thus saving taxpayer money and jobs!
Let's break out the booze and have a ball! That's all!!!
Glinkaism1 11 months ago
@Glinkaism1 Your homophobia betrays you. It's okay that you're gay. You don't have to be ashamed and try to cover it up by projecting onto others. After all it is you who said: "That's why you see very few new musicals."(I bet you love show tunes), ""Everything is twickety-boo. Twickety-boo. Twickety-boo." Lyrics added in an old Danny Kaye movie called "Merry Andrew." "(I'm sure you think Danny Kaye is a real dream boat). You're so gay, not that there's anything wrong with that
mstraney 11 months ago
@Glinkaism1 I didn't say anything about spelling, but I will take this opportunity to mention that you have the reading comprehension skills of a kindergartener. See tense has nothing to do with spelling, nor does the predicate subject relationship of a complete sentence. You attack someone for bad grammar, and your grammar is horrible. You accuse others for being gay, and you're probably gay. You criticize people as government leaches, well you probably get the picture by now.
mstraney 11 months ago
haha this is beyond laughable! If you believe this tripe I can get you a good deal on a bridge in San Fransisco.....LOL
BiiigT 1 year ago
the cow jumped over the moon...
and every fucker is laughing at cointelpro
spacehopperballs 1 year ago
The one thing that stood out for me was, I saw at least 2 objects hit the ground. One was even commentted on by the astronaut saying " it went into the hole" My understanding is that the moon has little to no gravity!
uncvralie 1 year ago
@uncvralie
It didn't fall into the hole, a Clanger pulled it from his hand to give to the Soup Dragon to stir his pan of soup.
1penguin99 11 months ago
@uncvralie Good one! By their own lies, the NASA-ites are trapped. There are lies, damned lies and government despicable lies. :)
Glinkaism1 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great stuff!
Be sure to check out the video on my channel explaining why the earth is in fact flat!
/sarcasm
Xclusive0001 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If we humans want to learn something from ourselves is the defect,that we have,thinking that we are always right and generations after gnerations learn that their ancestors were wrong and thought that something would be impossible to achive but the new generation see it as a common thing, our ancestors thought the world was flat they never even imagine that about half world was sitll hidden in our own world, having that as facts imagine what could be hidden in an universe we havent explore yet
johnsmith88100 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If we humans want to learn something from ourselves is the defect,that we have,thinking that we are always right and generations after gnerations learn that their ancestors were wrong and thought that something would be impossible to achive but the new generation see it as a common thing, our ancestors thought the world was flat they never even imagine that about half world was sitll hidden in our own world, having that as facts imagine what could be hidden in an universe we havent explore yet
johnsmith88100 1 year ago
what was that guy holding in the first vid???
hokiro888 1 year ago
@sandmanffm Im gonna get raped by alfamale gorilla... BEVARE CONSPIRACY FOOLS YOU WERE RIGHT!!!
d6ud9e 1 year ago
@sandmanffm whahhahhah you bet they will. I think the next conspiracy will be " Why does the goverment hide the spacemonkey attack in Roswell."
d6ud9e 1 year ago
@sandmanffm yep I actually have a video that provens that it was real if u wanna see it u write down youtube : Mythbusters Moon Landing Hoax 5 HQ. after i saw this I sas absolutely 10000% sure its true. go ahead wach it :)
d6ud9e 1 year ago
@sandmanffm im with you. I hear bullshit alot and this is the bigges peace of shit i've heard... in 6 days. anyway im with you
d6ud9e 1 year ago
@sandmanffm im with you this is biggest bullshit i've heard...... in 6 days :D
d6ud9e 1 year ago
Did they use the tones to count how many astronauts they got up there? :D
CUXOB2 1 year ago
Apollo was not the greatest exploit in history, but the greatest scam.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
Great video,NASA is sucks!!!
TFSification 1 year ago
@TFSification NASA sucks?? really?? can please explain why they "suck" with-out using childish language, and only using REAL FACTS not conspiracy theories? bet you cant.
fzappa007 1 year ago
This is complete HORSESHIT, I bet Mr. LunaCognita also believes in a race of reptilian aliens masquerading as government officials lulling all us "sheeple" into hypnotic slavery so they can take over our planet......We went to the moon morons, get over your theories they dont add up.
fzappa007 1 year ago
@fzappa007 Truth has been spoken. How many times do people have to debunk this stupid moon fake theory, and this theory is just priceless.
nils4545 1 year ago
@nils4545
Ot has not been debunked, it's a lie.
hunchbacked 1 year ago
@fzappa007 bla bla bla... if the moon fake-theory sucks so bad, why don't u marry it!!?
and have u ever seen a reptilian. if so, why not! -that is the question!!
CT2507 1 year ago
@CT2507 What???Oh Really?? what language are you speaking?? listen dumb-fuck, if you are going to communicate using the English language, YOU MUST LEARN IT FIRST!!! You fucking MORON!! You are with out a doubt one of the most RETARDED blow-hards I have ever come across "marry a theory"???WTF??
please go away...you fucking tool,, "if so, why not" WTF?? You are an idiot....CASE CLOSED.
fzappa007 1 year ago
@fzappa007 again i say...bla bla bla!!
u have nothing! u don't like my language? - u can lick it!!
enough said!
facts are facts and u have only a theory. what reptilians have u seen!!!? u have seen no one!
but still u bitch about it as if u did. i have, but i don't tell u about it cause it wouldn't matter to u anyway.
now go CLOSE your own CASE!!
idiot!§!
CT2507 1 year ago
Even if you are right (although you are not) who the hell cares?
demflep654321 1 year ago
I love these stupid "The Pie is a Lie" conspiracy nuts. The more, the better.
Less competition for my kids to get jobs that rely on actual intelligence.
RATFather 1 year ago
@RATFather lmao
nils4545 1 year ago
All of you want to believe the moon landings were a lie, because you yourselves can't achieve anything. Except maybe the next level of World of WarCraft. Get off your butts and go back to school. We went to the moon. Get over it already. This video doesn't prove shit.
TheAdultChild101 1 year ago
@TheAdultChild101 ooh so we are jealous now cause we cant go to the moon ourself!? dont think so. i dont have time. u try and have 5 kids and 3 jobs!! why waste time to go to the moon? thats a silly argument. and i even have the new expansion for world of warcraft... whats your point!?
we didnt go to the moon and u cant prove it. prove it then!! u cant!
bitch closed.
CT2507 1 year ago
Awesome stuff!
I noticed also that @3:56 NASA ground crew has to remind the astronaut, who *supposedly* is in direct sunlight, to put down his visor. Maybe the guy just didn't notice the super-glare burning out his eyeballs? :D
nameofthepen 1 year ago 14
pause at 7:04 to see a wire above one of the astronauts' heads!
0oDarkLordRevano0 1 year ago
anyone notice the beeps come as people stop/begin speaking. seems like this is a thing to let someone know someone is saying something.
zenphil 1 year ago
Such a system could never be ground controlled as the signal from the Moon to Earth takes 1.3 seconds (and 1.3 seconds back) so there should be pauses of 2.6 seconds everywhere. No such effect can be discovered.
BjornPalmen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
True Free energy devices exist,But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
lutherarao 1 year ago
your absolute worth theory yet. nasa is evil but this is horse shit. a beep could never convey useful information about live video and the beeps coincide with them talking all the time. moron
DanFrederiksen 1 year ago
lululu i ve got sum apples lululu you ve got too..lululu where are the ufos you daamn asholeee..O_o
boopss81 1 year ago
When both astronauts are in front of the camera....WHO IS HANDING THE CAMERA ???? This prove that it was on a set !
lonenut740 1 year ago
@lonenut740 Yeah... cause camera stands can only be used on sets... not in space.
derrrrr
RATFather 1 year ago
FACT: The computer on the Apollo craft was merely 64K! More was not possible at the time.
FACT: In 1962 the computer power was NOT available to process even still frames let alone live feeds.
FACT: Now we can but it has to be digital; 1962 they would say "Digital? What's that?"
FACT: The tones always coincide exactly with the radio talk. But lets just discard that
FACT: There is not one frame with these tones where there is no radio talk!
FACT: This video was made by a very ignorante person
DelphiMaster1 1 year ago
@DelphiMaster1 Your "facts" are easily disproved by paying attention to the video. I suggest you watch it again, mister "ignoranté"
RobSellsTacos 1 year ago
@RobSellsTacos Well state them then using the video and then disprove them. What is being suggested is impossible just simply because of the computer power fact or the lack there of at the time. A 64K computer that is like an old commodore 64 game computer that was around like 20 so years ago and we are talking about the 60's so more then 40 years ago. But you just keep on NOT using your brain, thats fine.
DelphiMaster1 11 months ago
LMFAO 02:20 that soil sample must have weighed a ton
oOADROo 1 year ago
idiots.....your beeps and astronauts entering and leaving frame don't even match up. What a bunch of loons.
Also...you look like a bigger fool by saying you have a confidential informant that worked on this project. Wouldn't it be easy just to "out" him on youtube and let the world know the landing was fake? "They" wouldn't dare kill him once his name was made public.
Bozos with nothing better to do.
skid987 1 year ago
The funny thing bout this whole "moon landing" stuff is that the footage is taken in the "Area 51".. The place exists as we all know and therefore the it's 'closed' and forbidden to approach..
DeathBankai91 1 year ago
Now if you said the beeps were covering up something to do with aliens, than maybe this video would have been interesting! So what if the astronauts entred and left the cameras view.....................
battlefront1940 1 year ago
The ONE thing "Moon Conspiracy Theorist" forget is that we were in a HUGE race with Russia to the moon. If there was ever even an inkling that we didn't go (they were listening in on all our transmissions), the Russians would have screamed and hollered at the top of their lungs. And there absolutley no way the Russians would have been "in" on the cover up!
JafoSalyer 1 year ago
@JafoSalyer This is the biggest reason that shows we did not fake the landing. The Soviets would have jumped all over this !
skid987 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
ivylsp 1 year ago
seriously, if this were true, NASA would have hacked you in a sec, its not that hard to hack a youtube acount dude.
1339twostepsahead 1 year ago
@1339twostepsahead
they have done that in the past, videos have been removed by youtube
ronan32 1 year ago
Great job LunaCognita! People don't believe that chemtrails exist, and their right over my house. Does NASA mean Never A Straight Answer?
Dakers11 1 year ago
Do you think that if you really had uncovered the truth about the 'quindar tone', this video would still be on here or have ever made it on here...?
In my opinion, the beeps do seem to relate to the video and happens to frequently for this to be pure coincidence.
Ajjtribe 1 year ago
at 6:45 look through the rover , you can see the system actually glitching out something (and is the only glitch in that clip), then as the camera continues to span , you see something semi-transparent running in the background .....................this whole video could have been explained just with that one clip ...6:42 to 6:53........look at the mountain range behind the rover !!!!!!!!!!!!
monkpkey 1 year ago
Damn! i thought those were just 'roger bleeps' from the cooms to let you know the astronaut had finished talking, but the sync is wrong, it DOES appear to be image related, but did they have this kind of computing power back in the 60's?
They probably had several ENIAC's working on it :)
stawmy 1 year ago
Okay, so what is the big, scary cover up?
BR5499a 1 year ago
If there is a genuine individual who played a direct role in manipulating this footage where is this individual, also where did they find this " Incredibly advanced video editing system" you claim was used to hide "the truth" Seems you have had too long with nothing worthwhile to do with your life but slag off NASA, the hundreds of technicians and the 12 men who were there and know the truth, ps im with you on this piggypolice
TOADLUM 1 year ago
you actually got something technically wrong about your quindar theory. at 7:07, why doesnt it beep when he reentered the frame? your evidence has been clearly been de bunked. It is a disgrace if you are american and you are doubting your nations greatest pride. also explain why they would have those random beeps during Gemini, and earlier apollo missions.
quadrupalace2 1 year ago
LOL, the perps' dupes & propagandists must be really desperate to keep the 'Moon landing' lie from being exposed! Love the irony, more psyops to hide the psyops. Wouldn't matter *what* type of camera: the film & photographs alone ARE the proof they never left Earth's orbit. Good for laughs though: "advanced fibre optics" but only a tin can to get there -- through the Van Allen Belts w/ NO protection from deadly radiation etc. etc.. Yeah right, "to infinity & beyond" eh?
JehanneDeLys 1 year ago 12
@JehanneDeLys Right on and well-said, as opposed to the illiterate NASA-its. They are history anyway. NASA is being dismantled, people fired and their shit auctioned off to real businessmen.
Glinkaism1 11 months ago
@Glinkaism1 Thanks mate :) Ah, literacy is a rarity & critical thinkers an endangered species. The deliberate dumbing down of the population, by govt "education" (indoctrination) systems over the past 50 yrs, is reaching critical mass — taught 'what' to think, not 'how' — by a new generation of illiterates!
"The people will believe what the media tells them they believe." -- George Orwell
JehanneDeLys 11 months ago 14
@JehanneDeLys Right you are, matey. :) Schools have had to accommodate certain groups that didn't "beeleev in noh schoolin' cuz day aint noh jobz inywayz. Sheetman. Az yew kin planelee see, ahz kin rite."
Great quote from Orwell! Did you ever read his "Down and Out In London and Paris?" That was a harbinger of an even larger underclass, thanks to the dumbing-down of schools.
Time to put on some Elgar: In London Town Overture. :)
Glinkaism1 11 months ago
6:42 to 6:53 As the video is spanning from left to right , watch the mountain range in the background . Thats big game !
monkpkey 1 year ago
Also, it gets worse towards the end, where imagination is stretched to signify object contact and relocation. Beep tones are not consistent with each occurrence, and some occurrence are not marked. What I see is paranoia, and far stretching of coincidence to support a theory which otherwise has no supporting evidence. I have watched a dozen of these vids, and none of them conclusively support the accusation that the moon landing was staged.
EletrikRidesAgain 1 year ago
@EletrikRidesAgain ????
the point here is not to debunk the moon landings,the point of the maker of video is that they got there,but was something there first,and nasa had the power to change the video picture,colour,filtering,etc,everytime a object entered the FOV,taking this way precaution measures for the eventuality of some Anomalous enter the cam FOV
singularityforsure 1 year ago
@singularityforsure It is pretty clear that the purpose is to try and "prove" NASA is lying, putting under question the entire program and its legitimacy. As you must know, there is an underground claiming the moon landing never happened, and they use claims like this to support their arguments.
EletrikRidesAgain 1 year ago
@EletrikRidesAgain I know that theory also,and in my humble opinion,nasa is hiding a great amount of info,my post was to make clear the intention of the video maker.
singularityforsure 1 year ago
@singularityforsure I guess then I really don't get the gist of the point trying to be made. Why would NASA lie and if they did, why does it matter? Alien detection? I just don't see the big deal - even if the claim was true which it clearly is not based on the clips referenced as I have discussed.
EletrikRidesAgain 1 year ago
I have analysed carefully the clips featured here. Contrary to your own claims, the beeps do not repeatedly coincide with FOV exits and entrances. There are times when beeps are heard where there are no changes in FOV. And the "detection" sensitivity is not constant. There are 2 beep tone frequencies and they do not repeatedly coincide with entry and exit. My conclusion: out of 1000's of beeps, you found some coincidence that are not even repeatable to support this theory.
EletrikRidesAgain 1 year ago
Maybe if I had a Ph.D. is computer technology, I could understand what this is supposed to prove. However, I'm just curious layman
0311jonesy 1 year ago
wow incredible! can't wait for part 2
love you
yonadav3 1 year ago
This has got to be one of the most stupid ''hoaxtard'' videos I've ever seen. Quindar tones are in no way connected to video editing, they were simply tones to switch voice transmissions on and off. The tones could be heard throughout every mission whether or not filming was taking place. Anyone who believes this bullshit is an idiot.
piggypolice 1 year ago
en fin y alcabo nunca he creido en estas cosas lo unico que se es que si podremos destruir y acabar paises como queremos .
yuca610 1 year ago
This video is total bullshit, i found some others intresting but this is shit.
Matu1 1 year ago
Very interesting information. I see the usefullness of such a system and i wouldn't be surprised if this were to be true. But what i don't get is, why do we (the public) "have" to hear these tones? I mean, if the images are being analysed here on earth in a live feed by a computer to automaticly filter out undesirables, why did they make it give a beep everytime it detected something, if their intention is to keep the system a secret? Where's the logic there?
I hope someone can answer me.
CCLJunky 1 year ago
Ok, so you got a bunch of bleeps out of a kazilion of bleeps coincidentally bleeping at the moment something visually happens considering something visually is happening all the time. Cool, that means you proved, well, jack-shit.
Doppe1ganger 1 year ago
someone explain to me how this lie so Bad.. ?
HeyYouPMme 1 year ago
What is more concerning is the fact that Nasa still hides some very sensitive data such as footages, videos of former ruins on the lunar surface...
There is something on the Moon and it is so fucking important that some people see the Kennedy Assassination as a result of that secret agenda, who knows?
Moonbasebrothers 1 year ago
Utter hogwash. What are you, 10 years old?
chat2ian 1 year ago
you wasted ten minutes on this,really!
MrLitespeed10 1 year ago
Wow this is actually pretty disturbing all these things they hide from us!
alpergumussu 1 year ago
The flashing strings attached to the backpacks catch more my attention, but hey... what do I know... I'm convinced we landed on the moon, as much as I'm convinced they would not broadcast that live. (too many things could have gone wrong) If I were them, I would have sent probes, film the physics and then stage it accordingly to baffle the russians. But, hey... sure. They might have had balls of steel and risk their national heros crashing in front of the world. Live. Sure.
Virakotxa 1 year ago
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
will these conspiracy theorists ever listen to reason?
pacificguitarist 1 year ago
interesting..but difficult thesis to fully accept. I am very skeptical by nature having spent years as a pro illusionist. I find the official NASA story contains amazing amounts of questionable data but so too do so many conspiracy theories. I remain skeptical but open-minded GOOGLE: JOHN LEAR Moon Mining ~a~
AdonisKingAXC 1 year ago
@AdonisKingAXC Good thing illusionist trumps scientist. WTH does that have to do with anything?
jib1000 1 year ago
@jib1000 the art of illusion shows the fallibility of perception.. my point was not about who trumps who at all.. my point is that when one learns how to deceive one realizes how easy it is to pull off a deception. Thus since things seemingly apparent in reality may indeed be only one perception OF reality and not ness. proof.. A skeptic questions all things.. Thus I am skeptical.. I reread my last statement and cannot understand why even question it..???
AdonisKingAXC 1 year ago
If the moon landing is fake, why could amateur astronomers and universities see the lander on the moon? You can buy a telescope now that will let you see the rover tracks, and the parts of the lander that stayed behind. Hundreds of non-governmental telescopes could see the lander while it was up there and could see the astronauts in the lunar rover.
Get an education before you try to tell people lies.
FAKE
FAIL
F U
jib1000 1 year ago
@jib1000- scwtrials- REALLY? I've been looking for years. Books, magazines, universities, Mt. Palomar, Mt. Wilson,& Griffith Observ. & NOBODY SEEMS TO HAVE ANY PICTURES ! The GREATEST SINGLE ACHIVEMENT of the last CENTURY, & not 1 of these OBSERVATORIES has a SINGLE PICTURE ! Perhaps you could POST those PICS with the NAME of noted AMATURE or EXPERT so we can ALL SEE WHAT WE'VE BEEN MISSING ! THANKS, WE'LL BE WAITING !
scwtrials 1 year ago
@scwtrials Um...why would i need a picture? Perhaps you can't read well? YOU CAN SEE THEM RIGHT NOW WITH A TELESCOPE!!!!! Any pictures i post you will only claim are faked. GO LOOK WITH YOU OWN EYES DUMMY! I've seen all these things with ny own eyes. I saw the lander with my own eyes in the 80's. I saw the lander tracks (better telescope) in the late 90's. Go use your own eyes and your own telescope (or a friends) so you can't claim that anyone is faking. Isn't that what science is?
jib1000 1 year ago
@jib1000 There are no telescopes positioned on Earth can see the luna rover.Non talk nonsense.
giottopersempre 1 year ago
Come on! Of course they lied and contine to lie about many things, and of course they always had technology ahead of the time. But this video is just laughable. Why the fuck would they transmit an AUDIO signal when the VIDEO software detected something?
Don't get me wrong, I am a conspiracy theorist to the core, but this is just lame!
whiterottenrabbit 1 year ago
You have to much spare time.. :S
As Opie says, what does that prove? And the lie is about what?
This aint prove of.. whatever you where trying to prove.. Its just framesounds, it could mean anything, like simple signal sounds when the astronaut enters the monitor, could even be on purpose..
Ahmyra 1 year ago
HEY NASA IF YOU REALLY WANT TO GET TO THE MOON AND LAND..give me a call.
gloverage 1 year ago
if you believe we spent money..us greedy Americans on a space program to actually get to the moon and further educate the people about the great unknown outer space..and if you think the government actually was more interested in going to the moon than money and power...than you are blind.this was a low cost film paid by tax payers that lead Americans into a world of war and pride. why? the amount of people who wanted to go to war increased as did the fear of other nations after this happened.
gloverage 1 year ago