I've only seen Star Trek I to Star Trek 10. 1st reason: After that I had a problem with the story because Kirk died already 2 times before that. Somehow I missed Q who snapped with his fingers so that Kirk could be alive again. 2nd reason: I'll dislike Star Trek 11 and 12 because of the weak story and the many mistakes in Star Trek 10 and because of the death of Data. I think that fans should have the right to have a remake of Star Trek 10 - with a better story. Paramount made a lot wrong there.
@SeabroMime In my eyes, the number 11 follows after 10. << That's the timeline which I see. And so the timeline gets destroyed. Otherwise they had named it Star Trek 0 instead of Star Trek 11. Star Trek 11 is everything after the year 2379 for me. ;-)
despite the fact that the mining ship was from a future farther than any of the events shown with E, and I wouldnt say the greatest seeing how its entirely seperate from the others, just like christian bale as batman in the newer series.
JJ Abrams is the best thing to ever happen to the franchise. Star Trek was queer before JJ came on board. I for one have never been a trekkie (trekker) but after JJ's incredibly entertaining interpretation, who knows...
@lumkiletyesi JJ Abrams is the worst thing to ever happen to the franchise. He basically made brainless movie for people like you - people who hate Star Trek.
@lumkiletyesi My friend. You'll won't become a Trek fan only in liking this movie. With this attitude you'll never be a Trek fan. At best you'll like the planned Jar Jar Abrams trilogy & you'll all forget about it 5 years later.
I cant wait till around 15 years, and Spock from the real timeline runs into Khan for the third time. "Oh not again"
I mean, for all the fanboys, there are still tons of crap outside the changes of this movie that will still happen like they did. The Botany Bay is out there waiting
Anyone who bags on this film is an idiot. People who cry about how it changed Star Trek story are complete idiots. No shit it changed the story because, like it was said in the movie, it's an alternate timeline now.
In real scientific terms, that means that the Star trek you know and love would still be happening. It's just that this one is now an offshoot of that timeline. Like in Back to the Future people, come on.
What people don't seem to get is that the whole alternate universe thing is really an attempt to keep faith with the fans, rather than just go for a Batman/James Bond style reboot (which I think would have been much better). Rather than just wipe the slate clean, they came up with a way to preserve the original universe, with potential for more series set there, *and* start over again without all the baggage. You can dislike the way it was done, but people should still recognise that.
This Trekverse has canonized itself as "alternate". The normal Trek universe is intact and well, and new stories can be written for it. I prefer the "normal" Star Trek universe myself, and would have preferred that the film was actually based on the original characters. The idea was okay, but I think it was poorly executed. Star Trek Classic *IS* based on equal doses of science and cheesiness, as well as very specific characters, stupid politics, and logically applied technology.
the prime timeline is intact as they have explained already in fact star trek online is set in the prime timeline i liked this movie it was a good way to separate it from the rest of the series now we have a good movie with the potetial for sequals now if only j.j. abrams would stop using so many lens flares
Excellent... you should bring this to Paramount's attention. Abbrams had no idea of what star trek was or any idea about science in general. Star Trek has lived for half a century because what science they did use was real (ie: seeing vulcan implode as if a moon or what a supernova really is). Abbrams has dismissed our objections with shooshing of his wrist saying it's just a movie. OK, well, it's just empty seats at the theater for the next one, JJ! Live long and prosper.
I find it hilarious that some people seem to take the 2009 film as a personal insult or something, and in so doing confirm the worst stereotypes of Star Trek fans. After the car crash that was Nemesis and the slow burner that was Enterprise, it was new Trek or no Trek.
ST: NEMESIS failed because of Rick Berman and Stuart Baird. The director never research Next Generation nor watch the series. Stuart Baird is more of an editor than a director.
@spoonmonkey14 I think if they had let Burton or Frakes direct it could have been a good movie - as many of the deleted scenes focus on story and character development. That bullshit dune buggy sequence that made it into the final version was just the nail in the coffin for me.
I agree with you completely, both Burton and Frakes directed episodes of DS9 and Voyager. What was Berman thinking with the buggy scene? At this point, he ran out of creativity.
@jimbopumbapigsticks truth,I liked all trek movies,but I'm no trekkie nerd that is still virgin. I liked this movie the most because it had drama,action and best special effects in movies (avatar piece of shit in every aspect)
Well, each to their own I suppose. But truthfully? Nemesis is the only Trek film that I didn't bother watching more than twice. I've seen the other ones dozens of times. And the 2009 reboot? Lost count. I like to pretend that Nemesis never happened.
@jimbopumbapigsticks I find it hilarious that someone think this movie was any better than "Nemesis"- it was basically the same movie: bold, crazy Romulan miner with uber ship, and "magical" super weapon, want to destroy the Earth. Wow, is completely different than "Nemesis"! ROTFL :) They both were pathetic excuses for a movie
@1701EarlGrey Agreed. JJ Abrams movie was far far superior in terms of special effects, photography and as such was easy for a mainstream base to get into, it doesn't change the fact that the script was horrific and plummeted Star Trek out of Science Fiction and into the craphole that is Science Fantasy. With a strong script however, the Abrams series has a good chance. But with the same writers working on the sequel, the chances of a well written sequel seem grim.
@RoareyeBlack I agree with you: Orci and Kurtzman sucks. Have you read proposed plot for new movie? Tribbles - freaking tribbles! - will destroy Klingon empire, and Klingons will become space Talibans. I wish I will joking about that. :( Thankfully I no longer care - I'm done with new Star Trek series/movies.
Really? Oh damn. I hope that's not the final draft, otherwise Star Trek is well and truly ruined.
However the positive is that it hasn't damaged most of Star Trek, just this rubbish alternate timeline, with it's bag of plotholes and horrendously bad writing.
I look forward to a new Star Trek franchise that continues the original universe and holds true to what Star Trek is all about. Unfortunately, that's not gonna happen for a while. Do you have a link to the new film plot?
@RoareyeBlack Thhats what I read online: "The Klingons play a prominent role in Star Trek 2. The angle, according to our sources, plays up them up as a Nomadic sect of warrior aliens causing trouble for the Federation — think an intergalactic Taliban with their home-planet overrun by Tribbles. Yes, those Tribbles, here in the newly rebooted continuity viewed as "furry carnivorous creatures."
google: The Star Trek sequel might feature a seriously unexpected alien race!
@jimbopumbapigsticks Sorry, but I beg to differ. JJ's vision was nice as a movie in general, but asa Trek film, it was a like watching everything that you love and then seeing somebody piss all over it from beginning to end. Fast pace is fine, but you got to at least keep the canon correct. Trek fans are quirky like that.
@jimbopumbapigsticks Here is how canon can be seen as being broken, but you could probably work out some way around this; the new timeline can only vary from the prime timeline starting from the precise moment the Narada exits the wormhole in 2233. That means everything from the prime-timeline that happened before this still happened, including Enterprise. This means the Ent episode Regeneration happened. This single episode links into everything else in the prime timeline.
how can you tell that XI does NOT take place in the same reality as the 40 year Star trek canon? well something like this would have happened, perhaps not Picard but the temporal police from the 30th century would have shown up to prevent the alterations to the timeline. lets just call this movie for what it is, a complete remake, with Nimoy not playing TOS-Spock but the adult version of this realities Spock, would explain his odd behavior. like his science errors, and him not saving Vulcan.
@BarbieBoy1997 Actually... Because of this new timeline it gives the powers that be a new reason to reboot the next generation for a movie or tv series a few years down the line... So its not that bad.
@BarbieBoy1997 The new timeline could mean that none of the TNG series happened, and for that matter, what happened in TOS may not have happened either. Thanks JJ.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This Star Trek is the Michael Bay of Star Trek films, overdone graphics with sexy people that are one dimensional and no real heart in it at all. Blowing up Vulcan was lame, might as well blown up Earth for its suspense value.
indeed, actually J.J and the writers worked with Bay on other projects. including Armageddon (J.J) and the first two Bayformers movies (writers) so naturally they are perfect for Star trek...even when J.J made clear he had Star wars in mind when he made this movie.
@henkman00 JJ having Star Wars in mind... then, perhaps he should go fix Lucas' mess and leave Roddenberry's Star Trek alone. Makes me ill. I've written Star Trek Fan Fiction and to see this attrocity is revolting. The actors did their jobs extremely well. Loved it. JJ should go work at Mcdonalds.
If it weren't for the destruction of Vulcan and the death of Spock's mother just for added suspense, I would haved loved this movie.A loot of diehard trekies will hate me for saying this, but lets face it. TOS Kirk is an egotistic nincompoop who on occasion has proved himself to be pretty sleazey. In one episode, he intetionaly provokes a Klingon govenor into murdering a bunch of civilians to turn the planet's learders (who were peacefuly cooperateing with the Klingons) against the Klingons.
My Dad is a huge Star Trek fan and he's the one who introduced it to me. My favorite series is TNG and First Contact is my fave film with Generations a close second. I do no think Star Trek (09) is "the best one," but certainly it is not that bad. Put yourselves in the shoes of the writers/creators. They couldn't make a movie about Enterprise; that series was awful. Voyager and DS9 are too obscure for a feature film, and TNG was too long ago to bring them back for another one.
@ghost20063 So what were they supposed to do? The direction they went in with changing the timeline is not the end of the world. So what? I don't care if you find fault with the acting, the cinematography or if you have genuine questions about the plot. But if you're just upset that the timeline is different and Spock is with Uhura and James T Kirk loses a barroom fight then, you just sound bitter. Your opinion has no weight if you're upset the movie didn't go the way you would have written it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I really hated that movie. Starships should look like starships, not beer distilleries. Jim Kirk doesn't lose a barroom brawl. If you have to give Spock a love interest, it should be a young Christian Chapel, not Uhura. The first captain of Enterprise was Robert April, not Pike. and so on and so on. JJ Abramms sucks, This is the only Star Trek I've only watched once, and that was once to many times.
It's pretty much a given that the timelines were screwed up during the events of First Contact. That's kind've how they implied the advancements of technology occurred so drastically different in the Enterprise series. Fanboys don't like it, but you mess with time and everything goes to hell.
ROFLMAO! I like this vid. You got it exactly right. The big double E would swat Nero's ship like a fly. Personally I like both universes and especially like the mirror universe of the Terran Empire. I have noticed that people are getting confused about the nature of XI. It's not "exactly" an alternate timeline but rather an alternate reality. The original timeline still exists and is unchanged by the events in that of XI.
THAT MOVIE WAS VERY OFFENSIVE AND DUE TO IT BEING A SEPERATE TIMELINE I REFUSE TO ACCEPT IT AS CANON ALSO JJ ABRAMS IS AN ASSHOLE OF EPIC FAIL LEVELS FUCK U TO ALL U PPL WHO JUST LOVE THE RAP HE HAS EVER MADE AND YES I'M TALKING TO ALL U STUPID LOST FANS THE ONLY GOOD THING HE HAS EVER DONE WAS FRINGE AND THAT WAS MEDIOCRE AT BEST
@tamukiro All I can say is you have issues As a trek, trekkie, trekker for ni nearly my whole life and it going of 40 years of star trek you my friend Miss the whole point. Oh do I have experience why yes I do. I ran with my friend 3 star trek conventions have meet over 50 actors plus writers producers and more. Oh I also talked to and meet the Great Bird as well. A few months before he died. yes there are things one might think sucks but is about the spirit not the cannon
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@tamukiro I agree wholeheartedly! You are correct, this film is NOT canon and never will be considered as such. JJ Abrams is a stammering, stuttering little prick who knows NOTHING about directing feature films! He and his HACKS Orci and Kurtzman should stick to TV and let the talented people who know what they're doing make movies!
@Actionguy1 Actually, this is considered as canon as the Mirror Universe. It's just as possible as said mirror universe (IU) and thus will be considered, as an alternate timeline, another universe known to the Federation.
more mistakes J.J. Abrams made,Kirk's original 2nd in command was Gary Mitchell not Spock where the the hell was he? and no mention whatsoever is made of Kirk's brother George Samuel Kirk,who only Jim calls Sam,face it folks,J.J. Abrams rined Star Trek,no doubt about it! at least in this humble Trekker's opinion.
@saml760 Its an entirely different universe then the original one that TNG, TOS, Ds9, and Voy inhabit. So whatever you know about the star trek universe doesn't matter much. I mean sure its different, but I personally thought that while I wish it was a bit more...like the original, taken as its own thing, its a very contemporary take on an old series, and I thought it was pretty cool.
@saml760 its not about cannon and I have the feeling you will get use to this sort of stuff after more time. They have screwed with ST ever since the beginning. ya I do have the experience in knowing that since I was around for the original airings and have items from that time like the first tech manuals created. clips from papers and interviews . There have been so many changes some for the good some well lets forget them.
I have to admit, though I absolutely love the J. J. Abrams' new ST, it did irk me that once they realized that Nero had altered history (spoilier alert) especially destroying Vulcan and killing Spocks' mother, no attempt was made to go back and stop Nero before he could change anything. This vid is cool!
Since I saw TOS in the '70's, I have seen all series, have bought all series, all movies, many books.If Star Trek didnt't exist my life would be lesser...
I tell you my truth: All star trek offered something, has a meaning, has a lesson, is ... a dream worthy to dream.
The New Star Trek? no problem, its great, its dreamy, its meaningful, its Star Trek. Old Star Trek? It's a Saga, a Myth. Both can give us dreams to dream, and both can Sell. So, hey producers: Sell us both please...dont be stupid
@Fett4 dude i had no idea that was him until i saw your comment. i was like, "what the fuck?" and then i looked it up and sure enough: longer hair, a beard, and like 30 lbs of muscle later you have thor.
So why is Abrams saying that the events in the Prime Time-line still happened in this time-line? Such bull-shit Abrams I hope you apologize for this. Also who's to say the Movie plots are still the same (excluding V).
Even though its peace intentioned, the though that Starfleet as not being a military organization is just ludicrous. If it was pure exploratory, those ships would be 1/10th their sizes, simple weapons, and their parent agency would not be involved with interplanetary peace treaties, humantarian missions, military op missions, and would not be involved in defense missions as well. (all those would be a government/military job)... and since Starfleet does all that... well that means its military.
Well to be fair to everybody that says that military activity should not be part of star trek... i mean c'mon...
If you're wearing a command-structure uniform and you're on a ship, and that ship has weapons (and WMD for that matter), and is part of a larger collective fleet, that in turn is answerable to a domocratic style government, in between peacfull AND hostile species... you bet your ass you're part of a military defense organization.
the only difference now is that the crewmen who died will never have children, and the kelvin would not be on a mission while it was being repaired. Another vessel would take it's place.
That's a good video! :) Tell the truth i join that people who sad: "the JJ version of StarTrek it's not follow the original line". The film is good - other american super production :) - but i can't like yet as StarTrek! I shall stay the "original" line of StarTrek! Live long and prosper and congratulation of your video!
Star Trek XI made warp look like hyperspace from Star Wars or the slipstream drive that we see in Voyager. Warp is supposed to "warp" space-time by folding the space in front of you to make the distance shorter and stretching the space behind you. That is why in TNG and VOY, the ships get thinner and longer as they are going into warp.
@jimbopumbapigsticks - When they casually mentioned the fact that their ENTIRE FLEET was engaged in a military action like it was something that wasn't remotely unusual?
@kmass2 The guy said their PRIMARY fleet (not their entire fleet) was engaged in some system or other. And he didn't say it was a military action. Given Pike's claim that the Federation was "a humanitarian and peacekeeping" force, they could have been helping with a planetary evacuation, handing out food parcels, or some such. Even if it was a military action, they could have been brokering a peace treaty or enforcing a ceasefire on request. I think you're reading too much into that.
@jimbopumbapigsticks - you kind of missed my point :-/. I never said there wasn't any action in old Trek, I just said that it wasn't handled so casually. And yes, the Dominion War was a large skill military action, but you never got the idea that that was normal in their galaxy.
@kmass2 Well, it is movie - would be weird for there to be no action, even by Trek standards where there are space battles and ships getting blown up in almost every film. And when do we get the idea that conflict and militarism are normal in the new timeline?
well i'm glad this movie didn't rely on fixing the timeline as the problem in the movie, been done too much, but COME ON nero was a flat villian whose motive was wanting to have spock return and destroy his planet because he failed in despertly trying to save his planet, even when the prime directive would have prevented him....Neros a dick
@TheInspector3000 Nero was supposed to be to Spock what Khan was to Kirk - both had gone insane and blamed Spock/Kirk for the death of a loved one, though neither was really responsible. Nero wasn't as convincing a villain as Khan, but those were his motives.
@jimbopumbapigsticks hm...never though of it as that way, I remember they tried recreating the Khan thing for picard in nemesis and it didn't work. but It makes sence, kirk didn't put khan on the planet to make him suffer, but to help him start a new civilization. By the way I really like this movie, but i'm not immune to it's plotholes
Nono this is a parallel timeline, the original Star Trek universe still exists. The actions of Nero caused a new timeline to diverge from the original - but the original is still there. Temporal Mechanics 101!
@prophetic0311 Exactly. People can't seem to comprehend basic physical concepts like that. They make it out to be much more complex than it really is.
I love the new Star Trek, but it isn't "for some odd reason" that a lot of people are upset. A franchise that used to be about a peaceful, idyllic future has been turned into a series of action movies about a warlike, militaristic future.
@kmass2 Not really. Virtually half of DS9 was spent in a conflict then all-out war. Voyager got into firefights every other week, as did the Enterprise-D. So did the original Enterprise, for that matter. You can argue that Trek's gone off-track from the original vision, but you have to acknowledge that it happened long before Abrams came on the scene. Anyway, action has always been a part of Trek, coupled with exploration.
LMAO Nice cut and paste job, at the end I bet he's thinking ...Wtf?...They're all good movies. Except for Star Trek 1,3,5, Nemesis. Oh and DS9 sucked. Space Opera. Yawn. Enterprise was better.
I"ve been a Trek fan for 40 years, and I loved the new movie. I think it's one of the best.
As for the destruction of Roddenberry's Star Trek, I think Abrams did a better job attempting to hold to Roddenberry's vision of Star Trek, than Rick Berman did.
Abrams wanted to make a movie that both Star Trek fans and non-Star Trek fans could enjoy. He wanted to bridge the gap. And I think he succeeded.
I know quite a few very hard core Trekkies, and they loved it too.
AN ALTERNATE UNIVERSE DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE ORIGINAL STOPS EXISTING!!! This movie was better than all the TNG films combined (Not saying much) and is definitely the best beside Wrath of Khan.
I love old star trek, but I think what J.J abrams did was brilliant.. It was a creative choice.. Do you know how hard it would have been to write a whole new fresh story, with all the past star trek stories? really hard.... He made it were things were just alike the old start trek to fit, but enough where he can have a free hand, and write a whole new adventure for us. He brought back my fav series, and I can not wait for a sequel to this movie..
@Bandofbrothersgirl Finally someone who loves the new movie. It was the best movie of '09 next to District 9 and I couldn't agree more with you! Already going apeshit for Star Trek 2.
@fROmTh3fUTURe lol I'm so glad someone agrees with me.. I was watching star trek stuff on here and everyone kept on ripping this movie and I really didn't understand why.. I can't wait till the 2nd one.. I didn't get to see this one in theaters but I'm defiantly going to see the next on in theaters :)
Many thanks for this video!!!
byte2702 4 days ago
I've only seen Star Trek I to Star Trek 10. 1st reason: After that I had a problem with the story because Kirk died already 2 times before that. Somehow I missed Q who snapped with his fingers so that Kirk could be alive again. 2nd reason: I'll dislike Star Trek 11 and 12 because of the weak story and the many mistakes in Star Trek 10 and because of the death of Data. I think that fans should have the right to have a remake of Star Trek 10 - with a better story. Paramount made a lot wrong there.
byte2702 4 days ago
@byte2702 You do realise Star Trek 11 is set over 100 years before Star Trek 10?
SeabroMime 2 days ago
@SeabroMime In my eyes, the number 11 follows after 10. << That's the timeline which I see. And so the timeline gets destroyed. Otherwise they had named it Star Trek 0 instead of Star Trek 11. Star Trek 11 is everything after the year 2379 for me. ;-)
byte2702 18 hours ago
What was the other movie he used with the next generations cast? (don't be harsh, I've only seen the 2009 movie)
Scsigs 1 week ago
Nice, editing. :) Very clever. :) Although, I agree that this film is one of the greatest Star Trek films. :)
pupbenny 1 week ago
despite the fact that the mining ship was from a future farther than any of the events shown with E, and I wouldnt say the greatest seeing how its entirely seperate from the others, just like christian bale as batman in the newer series.
jamerv86 2 weeks ago
They all became extras in a Next Generation Movie!
mr6johnclark 3 weeks ago
Nice editing. very good :P i like it xD
StmaWitchKingAngmar6 4 weeks ago
That was some really good editing! Made it look like it was originally intended to be that way. Bravo!
musicblt 4 weeks ago
I don't hate the new Trek. (Though I'd say the greatest Trek film is Wrath of Khan.) I love this video, too, though. :)
obsidian179 1 month ago
Original crew favorite film The Journey Home. TNG crew favorite film: First Contact.
tctfchamp 1 month ago
this wouldve been such a awesomer ending
MrBurgundy76 1 month ago
nice editing
nicklebackfans9 2 months ago
is that chis hemsworth @ 1:00 playing another role?????
zero2hero4910 2 months ago
@zero2hero4910 yes, that is him playing George Kirk, James T Kirk's father
SteenkampG 2 months ago
Second favorite Star Trek movie, first is Wrath of Khan.
Clonetrooperkev 2 months ago
JJ Abrams is the best thing to ever happen to the franchise. Star Trek was queer before JJ came on board. I for one have never been a trekkie (trekker) but after JJ's incredibly entertaining interpretation, who knows...
lumkiletyesi 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lumkiletyesi JJ Abrams is the worst thing to ever happen to the franchise. He basically made brainless movie for people like you - people who hate Star Trek.
1701EarlGrey 2 months ago
@lumkiletyesi My friend. You'll won't become a Trek fan only in liking this movie. With this attitude you'll never be a Trek fan. At best you'll like the planned Jar Jar Abrams trilogy & you'll all forget about it 5 years later.
Densaku 2 months ago
Spoclk coukd easily calculate where Khan's ship is and find it ahead of time as well as get ready for such stuff as the planet Killer.
GregasaurausRex 2 months ago
First Contact: Best 'Star Trek' film.
MrImastinker 2 months ago
I like both timelines too. But this is sweet.
Defiant47 2 months ago
both timelines are good... Let's just keep working on good Trek and not kill it...
But this was well done
7DayWalk 3 months ago
just goes to show that there is nothing in this world that a little picard cannot help
cornellm 3 months ago
I cant wait till around 15 years, and Spock from the real timeline runs into Khan for the third time. "Oh not again"
I mean, for all the fanboys, there are still tons of crap outside the changes of this movie that will still happen like they did. The Botany Bay is out there waiting
LoneSeraph2100 3 months ago
At the end Narada should have appered again and destroyed the kelvin :D
kralle98 3 months ago
Anyone who bags on this film is an idiot. People who cry about how it changed Star Trek story are complete idiots. No shit it changed the story because, like it was said in the movie, it's an alternate timeline now.
In real scientific terms, that means that the Star trek you know and love would still be happening. It's just that this one is now an offshoot of that timeline. Like in Back to the Future people, come on.
RaiderNic99 3 months ago 2
LOL I love the Enterprise E!! Quantum torpedoes rock!! :-D
danivarius 3 months ago
Captain Picard is the man
xchanticochulox 4 months ago 2
The USS Kelvin is techincally part of the Prime Timeline it exists before nero went back in time and changed things
Tuskin38 4 months ago
that was just funny imagine if that really happened
englishdragon88 4 months ago
What people don't seem to get is that the whole alternate universe thing is really an attempt to keep faith with the fans, rather than just go for a Batman/James Bond style reboot (which I think would have been much better). Rather than just wipe the slate clean, they came up with a way to preserve the original universe, with potential for more series set there, *and* start over again without all the baggage. You can dislike the way it was done, but people should still recognise that.
jimbopumbapigsticks 4 months ago
Wow. 420 likes and 47 dislikes. Everyone knows what 420 means, and true Trekkies know about 47 as well. That's cool.
xJoeEDangerouslyx 4 months ago
Starfleet would still upgrade the fleet after seeing that though...
Idazmi7 4 months ago
This Trekverse has canonized itself as "alternate". The normal Trek universe is intact and well, and new stories can be written for it. I prefer the "normal" Star Trek universe myself, and would have preferred that the film was actually based on the original characters. The idea was okay, but I think it was poorly executed. Star Trek Classic *IS* based on equal doses of science and cheesiness, as well as very specific characters, stupid politics, and logically applied technology.
Idazmi7 4 months ago
the guy at 0:48 sounds like Joker in mass effect.
Revan498 4 months ago in playlist Revan498's Favorited Videos
That was actually funny!
Idazmi7 4 months ago
the prime timeline is intact as they have explained already in fact star trek online is set in the prime timeline i liked this movie it was a good way to separate it from the rest of the series now we have a good movie with the potetial for sequals now if only j.j. abrams would stop using so many lens flares
wheelman298 4 months ago
@wheelman298 Lens flares are awesome.
VincentG991 4 months ago
This would have been a good ending to the actual movie, I'm not saying the ending is bad, just this one would be good to.
Morrisman1996 5 months ago
@Morrisman1996 A 4 minute movie!! LOL
1992Xenomorph 4 months ago
Even though I enjoyed the hell out of Star Trek XI and hope Abrams' sequel is just as good, this was still a great ending you've made here!
SFisher1993 5 months ago
Beautiful!!!!!
Mawilk 5 months ago
What alternate ending... Draco says "This is the real Ninth Movie, anything anyone else says is bull... wait for it... shit!"
2Draco39 5 months ago
this would have been excellent addon to the movie..
px002 5 months ago
Make it so? It's engage, ya dupe!
Brockhad 5 months ago
SWEEEEET this saves me 2 hours.
qazmko22 5 months ago
Niii-hii-iiiiiice :D
jongredic 5 months ago
Excellent... you should bring this to Paramount's attention. Abbrams had no idea of what star trek was or any idea about science in general. Star Trek has lived for half a century because what science they did use was real (ie: seeing vulcan implode as if a moon or what a supernova really is). Abbrams has dismissed our objections with shooshing of his wrist saying it's just a movie. OK, well, it's just empty seats at the theater for the next one, JJ! Live long and prosper.
swoganrich 5 months ago
lol nice
caricknight 5 months ago
Awesome! Love it!
briguy1971 5 months ago
this ending is better
ZuperNovas 6 months ago
I find it hilarious that some people seem to take the 2009 film as a personal insult or something, and in so doing confirm the worst stereotypes of Star Trek fans. After the car crash that was Nemesis and the slow burner that was Enterprise, it was new Trek or no Trek.
jimbopumbapigsticks 6 months ago 41
@jimbopumbapigsticks
ST: NEMESIS failed because of Rick Berman and Stuart Baird. The director never research Next Generation nor watch the series. Stuart Baird is more of an editor than a director.
spoonmonkey14 4 months ago
@spoonmonkey14 It's been reported that he thought Geordie was an alien.
jimbopumbapigsticks 4 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks
So i heard. Berman originally wanted LeVar Burton to direct Nemesis but instead, he choose Baird. -_-"
I am glad CBS kick him out.
spoonmonkey14 4 months ago
@spoonmonkey14 I think if they had let Burton or Frakes direct it could have been a good movie - as many of the deleted scenes focus on story and character development. That bullshit dune buggy sequence that made it into the final version was just the nail in the coffin for me.
jimbopumbapigsticks 4 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks
I agree with you completely, both Burton and Frakes directed episodes of DS9 and Voyager. What was Berman thinking with the buggy scene? At this point, he ran out of creativity.
spoonmonkey14 4 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks No, they were waiting for the RIGHT Trek
Revkor 4 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks what Star Trek needed to do was to go away and lick its wounds from the train wreck that was Enterprise.
They didn't need to reboot the franchise, it just needed to go away until humanity needed it again
sethsoverlord 4 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks And for a lot of people no Trek would have been better than new Trek; a fond memory rather than a raped childhood.
TheBlueGuard 4 months ago
@TheBlueGuard
Saying that the 2009 film raped one's childhood is possibly the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
jimbopumbapigsticks 4 months ago 2
@jimbopumbapigsticks Saying that Abrams movie was good it is most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
1701EarlGrey 2 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks truth,I liked all trek movies,but I'm no trekkie nerd that is still virgin. I liked this movie the most because it had drama,action and best special effects in movies (avatar piece of shit in every aspect)
Duke0Forever 3 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks A good comment, except Nemesis was loads better than this.
DangerousMoz 3 months ago
@DangerousMoz
*chokes*
Well, each to their own I suppose. But truthfully? Nemesis is the only Trek film that I didn't bother watching more than twice. I've seen the other ones dozens of times. And the 2009 reboot? Lost count. I like to pretend that Nemesis never happened.
Egabbacknuks 3 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks Your mom lets me piss in her mouth
essanance 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@essanance In the future, mouth-breathers like yourself will be extinct.
jimbopumbapigsticks 2 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks I find it hilarious that someone think this movie was any better than "Nemesis"- it was basically the same movie: bold, crazy Romulan miner with uber ship, and "magical" super weapon, want to destroy the Earth. Wow, is completely different than "Nemesis"! ROTFL :) They both were pathetic excuses for a movie
1701EarlGrey 2 months ago
@1701EarlGrey Agreed. JJ Abrams movie was far far superior in terms of special effects, photography and as such was easy for a mainstream base to get into, it doesn't change the fact that the script was horrific and plummeted Star Trek out of Science Fiction and into the craphole that is Science Fantasy. With a strong script however, the Abrams series has a good chance. But with the same writers working on the sequel, the chances of a well written sequel seem grim.
RoareyeBlack 2 months ago
@RoareyeBlack I agree with you: Orci and Kurtzman sucks. Have you read proposed plot for new movie? Tribbles - freaking tribbles! - will destroy Klingon empire, and Klingons will become space Talibans. I wish I will joking about that. :( Thankfully I no longer care - I'm done with new Star Trek series/movies.
1701EarlGrey 2 months ago
@1701EarlGrey
Really? Oh damn. I hope that's not the final draft, otherwise Star Trek is well and truly ruined.
However the positive is that it hasn't damaged most of Star Trek, just this rubbish alternate timeline, with it's bag of plotholes and horrendously bad writing.
I look forward to a new Star Trek franchise that continues the original universe and holds true to what Star Trek is all about. Unfortunately, that's not gonna happen for a while. Do you have a link to the new film plot?
RoareyeBlack 2 months ago
@RoareyeBlack Thhats what I read online: "The Klingons play a prominent role in Star Trek 2. The angle, according to our sources, plays up them up as a Nomadic sect of warrior aliens causing trouble for the Federation — think an intergalactic Taliban with their home-planet overrun by Tribbles. Yes, those Tribbles, here in the newly rebooted continuity viewed as "furry carnivorous creatures."
google: The Star Trek sequel might feature a seriously unexpected alien race!
1701EarlGrey 2 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks Sorry, but I beg to differ. JJ's vision was nice as a movie in general, but asa Trek film, it was a like watching everything that you love and then seeing somebody piss all over it from beginning to end. Fast pace is fine, but you got to at least keep the canon correct. Trek fans are quirky like that.
AdmlJoey1701 1 month ago
@AdmlJoey1701 How did it break canon? It's set in an entirely different universe.
jimbopumbapigsticks 1 month ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks Here is how canon can be seen as being broken, but you could probably work out some way around this; the new timeline can only vary from the prime timeline starting from the precise moment the Narada exits the wormhole in 2233. That means everything from the prime-timeline that happened before this still happened, including Enterprise. This means the Ent episode Regeneration happened. This single episode links into everything else in the prime timeline.
willmandude 4 weeks ago
The greatest Star Trek movie ever made was Wrath Of Khan, followed closely by First Contact. Period.
Lizfan2 6 months ago 2
how can you tell that XI does NOT take place in the same reality as the 40 year Star trek canon? well something like this would have happened, perhaps not Picard but the temporal police from the 30th century would have shown up to prevent the alterations to the timeline. lets just call this movie for what it is, a complete remake, with Nimoy not playing TOS-Spock but the adult version of this realities Spock, would explain his odd behavior. like his science errors, and him not saving Vulcan.
henkman00 6 months ago
@henkman00
I love the ending here.
Big-lipped Trekkie Alligator Moment! XD
Bobzeaux 6 months ago
chokes...i have wondered if the new time line meant that Picard and crew may never be born, thus ending the best series from ever happening(TNG)
BarbieBoy1997 6 months ago 3
@BarbieBoy1997 why should that not happen? TNG has already happened in another dimension! All that is still going on in a parallel universe!
Elghast 1 month ago
@BarbieBoy1997 Actually... Because of this new timeline it gives the powers that be a new reason to reboot the next generation for a movie or tv series a few years down the line... So its not that bad.
mr6johnclark 1 month ago
@mr6johnclark I like the sound of that! Just as long as SyFy channel doesn't get to touch it, or have ANY influence on it.
BarbieBoy1997 1 month ago
@BarbieBoy1997 The new timeline could mean that none of the TNG series happened, and for that matter, what happened in TOS may not have happened either. Thanks JJ.
AdmlJoey1701 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This Star Trek is the Michael Bay of Star Trek films, overdone graphics with sexy people that are one dimensional and no real heart in it at all. Blowing up Vulcan was lame, might as well blown up Earth for its suspense value.
xPureEx 6 months ago
@xPureEx
indeed, actually J.J and the writers worked with Bay on other projects. including Armageddon (J.J) and the first two Bayformers movies (writers) so naturally they are perfect for Star trek...even when J.J made clear he had Star wars in mind when he made this movie.
henkman00 6 months ago
@henkman00 JJ having Star Wars in mind... then, perhaps he should go fix Lucas' mess and leave Roddenberry's Star Trek alone. Makes me ill. I've written Star Trek Fan Fiction and to see this attrocity is revolting. The actors did their jobs extremely well. Loved it. JJ should go work at Mcdonalds.
swoganrich 5 months ago
Amusing. Considering how much better the Abrams Trek is to all the crappy TNG movies.
WarpSpider 6 months ago
If it weren't for the destruction of Vulcan and the death of Spock's mother just for added suspense, I would haved loved this movie.A loot of diehard trekies will hate me for saying this, but lets face it. TOS Kirk is an egotistic nincompoop who on occasion has proved himself to be pretty sleazey. In one episode, he intetionaly provokes a Klingon govenor into murdering a bunch of civilians to turn the planet's learders (who were peacefuly cooperateing with the Klingons) against the Klingons.
Revan498 6 months ago
nicely done! the new trek film is a GOOD film but NOT a trek movie :)
power543 6 months ago
Ahahahaha great job :)
atlantismoose 6 months ago
My Dad is a huge Star Trek fan and he's the one who introduced it to me. My favorite series is TNG and First Contact is my fave film with Generations a close second. I do no think Star Trek (09) is "the best one," but certainly it is not that bad. Put yourselves in the shoes of the writers/creators. They couldn't make a movie about Enterprise; that series was awful. Voyager and DS9 are too obscure for a feature film, and TNG was too long ago to bring them back for another one.
ghost20063 6 months ago
@ghost20063 So what were they supposed to do? The direction they went in with changing the timeline is not the end of the world. So what? I don't care if you find fault with the acting, the cinematography or if you have genuine questions about the plot. But if you're just upset that the timeline is different and Spock is with Uhura and James T Kirk loses a barroom fight then, you just sound bitter. Your opinion has no weight if you're upset the movie didn't go the way you would have written it.
ghost20063 6 months ago
picard is awesome
DominionChris 6 months ago 3
And that's why Picard's the best.
btw, First Contact=best Star Trek movie!
MrImastinker 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I really hated that movie. Starships should look like starships, not beer distilleries. Jim Kirk doesn't lose a barroom brawl. If you have to give Spock a love interest, it should be a young Christian Chapel, not Uhura. The first captain of Enterprise was Robert April, not Pike. and so on and so on. JJ Abramms sucks, This is the only Star Trek I've only watched once, and that was once to many times.
TheBubbabear67 6 months ago
@TheBubbabear67 Yeah April was captain first because the enterprise was launched much later in the prime timeline than in this one.
Delpheas 6 months ago
@TheBubbabear67 I have never agreed with every single thing someone has posted on a youtube comment.. well played sir.
JJ abrams can burn.
testy462 6 months ago
It's pretty much a given that the timelines were screwed up during the events of First Contact. That's kind've how they implied the advancements of technology occurred so drastically different in the Enterprise series. Fanboys don't like it, but you mess with time and everything goes to hell.
MrAustinjohn 6 months ago 2
yay!
nWo2sweeeet 7 months ago
wrath of khan is still the best trek movie
ralphy329 7 months ago 11
Picard was the best captain with the best crew minus Wesley Crusher
audiowiz 7 months ago
Lol spock and Nero screw up time and Picard fixes it.
WarpSpeedProductions 7 months ago
and thus it was that a star trek movie was made that was only 10 minutes long
deutschbag1000 7 months ago 2
The greatest video on teh youtubes.
heymrk 7 months ago
While that admittedly was a cool ending, I still like the ending in ST 09 too. I like the old timeline and the new.
PeachWookiee 7 months ago
I would LOVE this to have happened. Awesome ending.
WinterSalo 7 months ago
ROFLMAO! I like this vid. You got it exactly right. The big double E would swat Nero's ship like a fly. Personally I like both universes and especially like the mirror universe of the Terran Empire. I have noticed that people are getting confused about the nature of XI. It's not "exactly" an alternate timeline but rather an alternate reality. The original timeline still exists and is unchanged by the events in that of XI.
WMorgano 8 months ago
THAT MOVIE WAS VERY OFFENSIVE AND DUE TO IT BEING A SEPERATE TIMELINE I REFUSE TO ACCEPT IT AS CANON ALSO JJ ABRAMS IS AN ASSHOLE OF EPIC FAIL LEVELS FUCK U TO ALL U PPL WHO JUST LOVE THE RAP HE HAS EVER MADE AND YES I'M TALKING TO ALL U STUPID LOST FANS THE ONLY GOOD THING HE HAS EVER DONE WAS FRINGE AND THAT WAS MEDIOCRE AT BEST
tamukiro 8 months ago
@tamukiro u mad?
Fede17 7 months ago
@tamukiro well that was productive..
Trekfan1001 7 months ago
@tamukiro All I can say is you have issues As a trek, trekkie, trekker for ni nearly my whole life and it going of 40 years of star trek you my friend Miss the whole point. Oh do I have experience why yes I do. I ran with my friend 3 star trek conventions have meet over 50 actors plus writers producers and more. Oh I also talked to and meet the Great Bird as well. A few months before he died. yes there are things one might think sucks but is about the spirit not the cannon
malinourn 7 months ago
@malinourn And technically this film is just as possible as the Mirror Universe, so yes. This film is canon.
WarpSpeedProductions 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@tamukiro I agree wholeheartedly! You are correct, this film is NOT canon and never will be considered as such. JJ Abrams is a stammering, stuttering little prick who knows NOTHING about directing feature films! He and his HACKS Orci and Kurtzman should stick to TV and let the talented people who know what they're doing make movies!
Actionguy1 7 months ago
@Actionguy1 i agree buddy but there is only one abrams series that is good and it's fringe
tamukiro 7 months ago
@tamukiro Agreed!
Actionguy1 7 months ago
@Actionguy1 Actually, this is considered as canon as the Mirror Universe. It's just as possible as said mirror universe (IU) and thus will be considered, as an alternate timeline, another universe known to the Federation.
WarpSpeedProductions 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@WarpSpeedProductions The Mirror universe was COOL! This one is NOT COOL! JJ Abrams' Star Trek universe sucks extreme ASS!
Never considered canon! Gene Roddenberry's ashes are spinning so fast in his urn that no one will ever be able to open it!
Fuck JJ Abrams!
Actionguy1 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@WarpSpeedProductions Sorry my friend, this movie is considered SHIT in any universe.
Actionguy1 7 months ago
Fuck yeah! Picard saves the day! xD
Fede17 8 months ago
more mistakes J.J. Abrams made,Kirk's original 2nd in command was Gary Mitchell not Spock where the the hell was he? and no mention whatsoever is made of Kirk's brother George Samuel Kirk,who only Jim calls Sam,face it folks,J.J. Abrams rined Star Trek,no doubt about it! at least in this humble Trekker's opinion.
saml760 8 months ago 2
@saml760 Its an entirely different universe then the original one that TNG, TOS, Ds9, and Voy inhabit. So whatever you know about the star trek universe doesn't matter much. I mean sure its different, but I personally thought that while I wish it was a bit more...like the original, taken as its own thing, its a very contemporary take on an old series, and I thought it was pretty cool.
AngelicRemorse 8 months ago
@saml760 its not about cannon and I have the feeling you will get use to this sort of stuff after more time. They have screwed with ST ever since the beginning. ya I do have the experience in knowing that since I was around for the original airings and have items from that time like the first tech manuals created. clips from papers and interviews . There have been so many changes some for the good some well lets forget them.
malinourn 7 months ago
Given that technology was much more advanced due to the Kelvin's scans of the Narada, wouldn't they be able to do the same with the Enterprise-E?
Alkonium 8 months ago
That would have been cool I was expecting someone to restore the timeline during the whole movie.
SwordsmanMercenary 8 months ago
I have to admit, though I absolutely love the J. J. Abrams' new ST, it did irk me that once they realized that Nero had altered history (spoilier alert) especially destroying Vulcan and killing Spocks' mother, no attempt was made to go back and stop Nero before he could change anything. This vid is cool!
gorn9146 8 months ago
And that's how it should have been.
Jackie1701 8 months ago 2
Not bad
NTRCOOL 8 months ago
ha, brilliant!
dewgy32 8 months ago
alternate THE SHAT end: a giant bloated william shatner face from our presence comes out of the black hole and eats the enemy ship. END
SamyouALjaxon 8 months ago
Since I saw TOS in the '70's, I have seen all series, have bought all series, all movies, many books.If Star Trek didnt't exist my life would be lesser...
I tell you my truth: All star trek offered something, has a meaning, has a lesson, is ... a dream worthy to dream.
The New Star Trek? no problem, its great, its dreamy, its meaningful, its Star Trek. Old Star Trek? It's a Saga, a Myth. Both can give us dreams to dream, and both can Sell. So, hey producers: Sell us both please...dont be stupid
damnyourpasswords 8 months ago 2
A true Starfleet captain needs no hair.
fROmTh3fUTURe 9 months ago 58
@fROmTh3fUTURe just like picard. :)
LawsonMovies 6 months ago
@fROmTh3fUTURe epic win right there!
RockMan356 6 months ago
Why doesn't Thor just throw his hammer at the ship?
Fett4 9 months ago 25
@Fett4 Because that couldn't happen for the subplot with the stepfather.
maggosh 8 months ago
@Fett4 dude i had no idea that was him until i saw your comment. i was like, "what the fuck?" and then i looked it up and sure enough: longer hair, a beard, and like 30 lbs of muscle later you have thor.
ghost20063 6 months ago
@Fett4 he was busy.
Supedriver 5 months ago
So why is Abrams saying that the events in the Prime Time-line still happened in this time-line? Such bull-shit Abrams I hope you apologize for this. Also who's to say the Movie plots are still the same (excluding V).
Kefka44 9 months ago 2
Even though its peace intentioned, the though that Starfleet as not being a military organization is just ludicrous. If it was pure exploratory, those ships would be 1/10th their sizes, simple weapons, and their parent agency would not be involved with interplanetary peace treaties, humantarian missions, military op missions, and would not be involved in defense missions as well. (all those would be a government/military job)... and since Starfleet does all that... well that means its military.
emenentia 9 months ago
Well to be fair to everybody that says that military activity should not be part of star trek... i mean c'mon...
If you're wearing a command-structure uniform and you're on a ship, and that ship has weapons (and WMD for that matter), and is part of a larger collective fleet, that in turn is answerable to a domocratic style government, in between peacfull AND hostile species... you bet your ass you're part of a military defense organization.
emenentia 9 months ago 2
Comment removed
emenentia 9 months ago
Ahhhhh, if only......
TomatoeAssassin 9 months ago
@spectre0075 what about Voyage of the damned sorry "Voyager" Then again 7 of 9 was kind of cute. Sorry I going to have a cold shower lol
Zorolord 9 months ago
So it should be and never otherwise, jeah Piccard FTW !
Novo117 9 months ago
the only difference now is that the crewmen who died will never have children, and the kelvin would not be on a mission while it was being repaired. Another vessel would take it's place.
ImSoOffended 9 months ago
LOL pretty funny Yeah i really wish they didn't just screw up the timeline just to replace the actors.
There are so many voyages that the first enterprise crew could've had after the thrid season of where they left off.
dawfydd 9 months ago
That's a good video! :) Tell the truth i join that people who sad: "the JJ version of StarTrek it's not follow the original line". The film is good - other american super production :) - but i can't like yet as StarTrek! I shall stay the "original" line of StarTrek! Live long and prosper and congratulation of your video!
trekkerprise 9 months ago
Star Trek XI made warp look like hyperspace from Star Wars or the slipstream drive that we see in Voyager. Warp is supposed to "warp" space-time by folding the space in front of you to make the distance shorter and stretching the space behind you. That is why in TNG and VOY, the ships get thinner and longer as they are going into warp.
tfr4444 9 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks - When they casually mentioned the fact that their ENTIRE FLEET was engaged in a military action like it was something that wasn't remotely unusual?
kmass2 9 months ago
@kmass2 The guy said their PRIMARY fleet (not their entire fleet) was engaged in some system or other. And he didn't say it was a military action. Given Pike's claim that the Federation was "a humanitarian and peacekeeping" force, they could have been helping with a planetary evacuation, handing out food parcels, or some such. Even if it was a military action, they could have been brokering a peace treaty or enforcing a ceasefire on request. I think you're reading too much into that.
jimbopumbapigsticks 9 months ago
*large scale military action, dang typo
kmass2 9 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks - you kind of missed my point :-/. I never said there wasn't any action in old Trek, I just said that it wasn't handled so casually. And yes, the Dominion War was a large skill military action, but you never got the idea that that was normal in their galaxy.
kmass2 9 months ago
@kmass2 Well, it is movie - would be weird for there to be no action, even by Trek standards where there are space battles and ships getting blown up in almost every film. And when do we get the idea that conflict and militarism are normal in the new timeline?
jimbopumbapigsticks 9 months ago
i love it. now this is the alternate ending the should be included with the blu-ray.
batmanfanforever08 9 months ago
well i'm glad this movie didn't rely on fixing the timeline as the problem in the movie, been done too much, but COME ON nero was a flat villian whose motive was wanting to have spock return and destroy his planet because he failed in despertly trying to save his planet, even when the prime directive would have prevented him....Neros a dick
TheInspector3000 10 months ago
@TheInspector3000 Nero was supposed to be to Spock what Khan was to Kirk - both had gone insane and blamed Spock/Kirk for the death of a loved one, though neither was really responsible. Nero wasn't as convincing a villain as Khan, but those were his motives.
jimbopumbapigsticks 9 months ago
@jimbopumbapigsticks hm...never though of it as that way, I remember they tried recreating the Khan thing for picard in nemesis and it didn't work. but It makes sence, kirk didn't put khan on the planet to make him suffer, but to help him start a new civilization. By the way I really like this movie, but i'm not immune to it's plotholes
TheInspector3000 9 months ago
@TheInspector3000 No, me neither. I'm just saying that's probably what they were going for, and they did a better job of it than in Nemesis.
jimbopumbapigsticks 9 months ago
Nono this is a parallel timeline, the original Star Trek universe still exists. The actions of Nero caused a new timeline to diverge from the original - but the original is still there. Temporal Mechanics 101!
prophetic0311 10 months ago
@prophetic0311 Exactly. People can't seem to comprehend basic physical concepts like that. They make it out to be much more complex than it really is.
Supermassively 10 months ago
lmao nice
batman1717k 10 months ago
I love the new Star Trek, but it isn't "for some odd reason" that a lot of people are upset. A franchise that used to be about a peaceful, idyllic future has been turned into a series of action movies about a warlike, militaristic future.
kmass2 10 months ago
@kmass2 Not really. Virtually half of DS9 was spent in a conflict then all-out war. Voyager got into firefights every other week, as did the Enterprise-D. So did the original Enterprise, for that matter. You can argue that Trek's gone off-track from the original vision, but you have to acknowledge that it happened long before Abrams came on the scene. Anyway, action has always been a part of Trek, coupled with exploration.
jimbopumbapigsticks 9 months ago
LMAO Nice cut and paste job, at the end I bet he's thinking ...Wtf?...They're all good movies. Except for Star Trek 1,3,5, Nemesis. Oh and DS9 sucked. Space Opera. Yawn. Enterprise was better.
KrazyDanProductions 10 months ago
I"ve been a Trek fan for 40 years, and I loved the new movie. I think it's one of the best.
As for the destruction of Roddenberry's Star Trek, I think Abrams did a better job attempting to hold to Roddenberry's vision of Star Trek, than Rick Berman did.
Abrams wanted to make a movie that both Star Trek fans and non-Star Trek fans could enjoy. He wanted to bridge the gap. And I think he succeeded.
I know quite a few very hard core Trekkies, and they loved it too.
skippyqsb 10 months ago
Well done!
technologic21 10 months ago
Hey any new star trek is a good thing but it should have been relevant to the prime timeline
tsunamaisurfer606 10 months ago
Lol the captain leaned into his chair dramatically like four times in this clip
Methodologyofmadness 10 months ago
AN ALTERNATE UNIVERSE DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE ORIGINAL STOPS EXISTING!!! This movie was better than all the TNG films combined (Not saying much) and is definitely the best beside Wrath of Khan.
NaprTuber 10 months ago
I love old star trek, but I think what J.J abrams did was brilliant.. It was a creative choice.. Do you know how hard it would have been to write a whole new fresh story, with all the past star trek stories? really hard.... He made it were things were just alike the old start trek to fit, but enough where he can have a free hand, and write a whole new adventure for us. He brought back my fav series, and I can not wait for a sequel to this movie..
Bandofbrothersgirl 10 months ago 43
@Bandofbrothersgirl Yeah, I just hope the next movie goes back to Star Trek's optimistic, utopian roots.
action scenes are fun, but Star Trek was never *all* action...
spacehelmetforacow 9 months ago
@Bandofbrothersgirl Finally someone who loves the new movie. It was the best movie of '09 next to District 9 and I couldn't agree more with you! Already going apeshit for Star Trek 2.
fROmTh3fUTURe 9 months ago
@fROmTh3fUTURe lol I'm so glad someone agrees with me.. I was watching star trek stuff on here and everyone kept on ripping this movie and I really didn't understand why.. I can't wait till the 2nd one.. I didn't get to see this one in theaters but I'm defiantly going to see the next on in theaters :)
Bandofbrothersgirl 9 months ago