Added: 1 year ago
From: theENERGYDREAM
Views: 73,764
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (66)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Looks very interesting. Keep up the good work.

  • Very clever invention! Good work and thank you for sharing

  • The squared in the E=MC sq comes from the fact that mass increases in proportion to the energy as it reaches the speed of light. However, in a stationary form it is true that all matter is energy that is not doing work. This creates all kind of problem for anyone wishing to harvest more energy than they put into their machines. Can it be done ? The universe says yes. One look at the solar system in continual action gives us the clues.

  • I noticed he had to spin it up first. THAT MEANS IT'S A TERRIBLY INEFFICIENT BIOLOGICAL-ELECTRICAL ENGINE. It's just an engine that powers itself. He isn't doing anything special or clever.

  • It kind of reminds me of Edward Leedskalnins generator. Dont stop now, your almost there!

  • Good job, but just a nice amateur CONSTRUCTION. Electromagnetic generators are being used for over a century now. Also you believe that you don't go against any physics law, and that's true. BUT, all the power that generates the electric energy comes from your hand moving the disk. That means, that if you want to use it to work an electrical device you'll still have to consume energy turning the generator wheel. And the autonomous thing is just the initial energy (by hand) that's being recycled.

  • Thanx for the tip on gravitational escape, and the use of the same principle of opposition to ecape load. I see the addition of many coils and therefore greater speed, and voltage production. I do not see, any drag, or load increases in this design. I want to attempt to test these theories, a nd report my findings to you. I am subscribing. I am not seeking financial gain, only over unity freedom for myself. I live in tennessee also.

  • does it ever stop?

  • ...Well...I'm 64 years old now...so moving the energy around is really getting hard in the mornings...

  • nice experiment. but people would never really use that for as replacement. Maybe he could turn this thing into a toy and sell it for a few millions.

  • More copper coils on top AND bottom. Since magnets have a field AROUND them. Just a suggestion.

  • You are gonna bankrupt BP and all other energy companies with your inventions lol

  • Governments Y U NO USING THIS ???

  • the generator that runs the motor that runs the gen........ Basicly the essense of all perp-mot machines. How original. Guess hes having fun and has a hobby though--could be worse. He could be roaming around on utube looking at moronic, unworkable inventions. Which is more lame--what hes doing or what im doing??????

  • try writing on cards.and stick to them.

  • You should stick to loading trucks . . . or whatever you do

  • Couldn't partially shielding the magnet & coil, so they approach shield to shield, then open to one another when magnet is slightly past coil, not only reduce repulsion against rotation, but power rotation as magnet is repelled away from coil? Just curious.

  • Ha! Free of gravity!

  • Since you've made this startling discovery that Eisenstein was wrong I'd suggest you write a paper describing your method of determining this and PUBLISH it in any of the world accepted scientific journals.

    ----------------

    @1crazyfocker You dont understand. the value of C could equal 1 if you used the right definitions.

    ----------------

    Maybe - but then YOU are in error not Eisenstein.

  • if e=m then matter could be converted to energy.... that is not possible.

  • @GaroBlu sorry to bust your bubble but matter can absolutely be converted to energy. and energy to mass. examples: (1)atomic bomb. (2)energy to mass has been accomplished inside particle accelerators.

    p.s. this does not mean I agree with this guys equation lol

  • Replay to earthschool101: Hello, I had no idea this channel page existed until now. theENERGYDREAM did this as a favor to me to help me out but, I had no idea because I couldn't afford the internet for months. I wouldn't have been that rude.

  • You mention more than once that you are using a "frictionless bearing". Where did you get this? If I were you, I'd get that patented RIGHT NOW! Then you should be able to retire comfortably. As far as I know, you are the only one that has such a bearing. And thanks for pointing out the flaw in Einstein's theory, it's nice to see someone with the guts to do it.

  • This design looks very promising. I always figured magnets would have to be used in multiple ways for this, including the levitation effect for massively reduced friction. If perfected the only thing that would slow this down would be air resistance, but put it in a vacuum and there ya go. Would love to see it rebuilt with better material and a more precise and balanced spin.

    Something like this could be run in space and use microwaves to shoot the power down to earth!

  • good work! but wont it eventually spin down? the minute you connect a load, it will act like friction and slow it down

  • self running...with a little help from my finger.. lol just kidding! it really looks like you got some perpetual going there, now to fine tune balancing and soup it up with extra magnets or whatever you do...then run a fan off of it or something. good work

  • put a laser RPM meter on it.

  • E=mC² is incorrect? C² is a conversion factor between units of mass and energy. Certainly using units where C = 1 is the most natural and useful, but saying that E=mC² is incorrect is like saying that mm=25.4xinches is incorrect. A more general formula is E² = (mC²)² + (pC)²

  • @SodiumMonoCrapolate umm in E=MC2 C will never =1 it cant C is constant, its the speed of light, your math is wrong

  • @1crazyfocker You dont understand. the value of C could equal 1 if you used the right definitions.

    We say C=186Kmiles/sec or 300M meters/sec, because we have DEFINED feet & meters.

    Lets create a new measurement unit called an Einstein.

    1 Einstein = 186,282 miles per second = 300Mmeters/sec

    So now C =1, 1 Einstein that is.

    See how it works? C is a constant used to convert between Units.

  • What kind of a "burn-in" test have you done? I would run it and see how long it runs on it's own before I presume it is not bogging. Either way, very nice. Good Job.

  • Ok so a little lost here, are you putting Power in? and if so what return differance are you getting back?

    Cheers

  • E=mc^2, however, would show that if you have zero conversion of mass to energy, you get zero energy.

    Unless this machine 'burns' matter into energy, it's doomed to fail.

  • Nice ideas...but there is CEMF working to slow your flywheel down. I've been all around the world, studied and tried to induce and inductionless coil. I've succeed in creating differing coefficients of coupling for induced and reflexed...but in the end, never works, just higher efficiency. If you're serious about free energy you'll find it in a spark gap, cold spark no current flow. Yes free energy does exist, but it's hard to tame a spark gap.

  • By defintion thats impossible, unless you factor in magnets, which are an additional force that do not require any fuel to function, only to potentiate them. But in that case the output would still be smaller, you just have a big "free" input from the magnets.

  • If it could produce more electricity than it consumes it should be able to to accelerate once it gets going. Looks to be slowing down to me. And magnetic very low friction bearings are pretty easy to build but you have not done it here. You are only overcoming one angle of friction.

  • Wouldn't it be ideal to put the flywheel in a vacuum to get rid of fluid friection or do I not know what I'm talking about. please enlighten me.

  • write a script dude, you are so hard to listen to

  • e=mc2 is just an opinion and it comes from reactions, nuclear reactions to be more exact cause c its as u know light speed but the trick is that energy it goes exponential as the speed raises so at low speeds u can say e=m

  • lol way to disregard einstein's energy-mass equivelance

    E=Mc^2 means energy is proportional to mass, which is what you're arguing, so saying E=M is incorrect.

  • nah still not convinced, if he made the wires more organized then maybe.

  • The generator coil causes drag. It does get translated to rotation, but it still causes a drag spike on the main flywheel. Also, the fact that the magnets rotate, actually kills the power. Which is why generators are designed the way they are, electricity is produced when flux lines are forced through a wire moving the electrons. With this setup, there is barely, if any electricity produced. What you loose in load drag you also loose in power generation. This thing is slowing down. look close.

  • what is the load? and shouldnt the thing be able to accelerate with its own power?

  • GENIUS

  • what about the friction due to air?

  • @dallasgoldbug you could allways throw it into a vacuum

  • You should just use SS magnet wire instead of Copper.

    It doesn't have magnetic drag.

  • nothing is being created, this archaic discussion is based on a missconception, think of it as a bank account, when you take money out of the ATM you are not creating it ... you are withdrawing it only, the money is already there. The real question is to define what is the ATM and the bank.

  • @perezosoundercover

    But if you take out a loan from a bank or charge something on your credit card you are creating money. Right out of thin air.

    Thanks to the glory of Fictional Reserve Banking.

  • hmmm  very smart...

  • I'm a Master Electrician, training to be an electrical engineer and this is awesome. I understand how it works and it is something that is believable and is being done by people like me. People who are tired of the big gas companies, energy companies, and governments, how they are so money hungry.

    We need to gather up an elite team of all these guys, create some over-unity, then call for a revolution!

  • ...ps...good job...it is a cool gizmo...but seriously will it run forrrevrrrrr....

  • perpetual energy...i think i missed something from my Physics class...energy is nether created nor destroyed...you say your set-up produces more energy then it consumes...how is this so...what would Einstein say...how long has this rig been running...

  • @tommytoster He didnt say it created energy... He said the energy is just moving around.

  • show the measurements how it works. rotating mass speed in function of produced electricity and stability in time

  • Good Idea, but not to knock you or anything force still apples in this. Centrifugal force and friction, friction from the air surrounding the machine. One question out of one start up will the machine continue to work with out any outside physical force.

  • how big of a generator is that? could you help me. email me please

  • ok so you've created something cool, but come on, don't act smart saying E is not =mc^2. E=mc^2 doesnt apply to your machine because it only applies to nuclear energy.

  • About time I seen someone make a frictionless motor / generator.

  • Great generator with very smart thinking. It would be great to see this machine running with more coils and numbers about the output and also a during test. Colleague inventors, hobbyists need some more prove to go for this design and build there own machines. The gravity and spinning coil magnet are great! Keep on going and show us more.

  • A LOT OF RESPECT TO YOU SIR. Please Dont Let your self to be effected by any SHIPPLES who say that Free Energi doesnt exsists. IT amases me that how much people are in Denial, because some of the things that they learn is not the same as what they have been tolled before!!!? Keep Up the good work, and GOOD LUCK TO YOU.......... :-)

  • I have some skepticism about this, but I do believe that we collectively can produce something that would accomplish the goal of making free energy. Thanks for sharing!

  • i totally agree with you on this one, great video

  • Very nice Wendell.

    I applaud you for sharing your ideas.

    Great idea for overcoming load drag...it's so simple, spinning the magnet dissipates the drag, by imparting the drag force into rotational energy to the magnet itself...genius.

    Well done mate.

  • @spikeychops - he does not over come load drag. The point at which the magnet passes under the other magnet will create an attraction or load. Magnets do not care if they are spinning or not. At the point when the magnet trys to leave the field of the other it will apply resistance.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more