Euro NCAP | Honda Civic | 1998 | Crash test

[Annihilator1111]

the engine on the 1996-2000 Honda Civic Engine 1.4 L D14A3 I4 1.4 L D14A4 I4 1.5 L D15Z4 I4 1.6 L D16Y4 I4 (AUS version) 1.6 L D16Y5 I4 1.6 L D16Y7 I4 1.6 L D16Y8 I4 1.6 L B16A2 I4 1.6 L B16B

[TheDM75]

@xXRoyaltyXx7 So what Sedan are you talking about? Yeah it must be a REAL car, much better and expensive than a Honda. Fucking asswipe trying to look like you know anything about cars... Honda is reliable and yes it's not expensive, it's for smart starters... dumbfuck.

[TheDM75]

@xXRoyaltyXx7 piece of shit? This test is probably the best of that year. Fucking idiot.

[Annihilator1111]

the 1996-2000 Honda Civic was assemled in Swindon, England Suzuka, Japan East Liberty, Ohio, United States Alliston, Ontario, Canada Lahore, Pakistan Aragua, Venezuela Sumaré, Brasil Hsinchu, Taiwan Nelson, New Zealand Gebze, Turkey

[Holmes1MN]

honda has come a long way

[brodacichego]

e tam, widać jak szpachla odpada, pewnie był już wcześniej bity...

[1waffleiron]

@xXRoyaltyXx7 Bro, this was one of the better crash tests at the time.

[chilipepper25]

Sure as shit better than the Dodge Neon I used to own - check out the crash test vid for the '95 - yikes. What a heap of shit too. Honda for life.

[crazzzydave]

Yeah, that is deffinately a honda civic, and not an accord. Looking at the trim level, probably an MB2.

[thegripfreak101]

thats an accord

[g0t91]

yay.. i have a 99 civic.. and at least i know im going to die if i get hit in the side!! :)

[izze1000]

thats no civic



[RealRapMusic187]

@izze1000 it is a civic but i think its only a europen model

[rocknrollneverdied]

this isnt a proper civic its a shite one made in england by rover if u look at the 1998 rover 416 u will see its almost exactly the same car just the badges are changed even the engine is the same.

[johngreen537]

@rocknrollneverdied

You obviously know nothing about Hnodas!

The engines are not the same! The rover cars used (genereally) the K Series engines, where as the Honda's use real engines!

[jamesdownes1000]

@rocknrollneverdied

your 100% wrong man

the engines are hondas own

and the came with a slightly de tuned version of the integra type r engine (b18c4 170bhp)

grate car i have had 2

[rocknrollneverdied]

@jamesdownes1000 sorry man my mistake i was told different and was only saying what i knew

[crazzzydave]

@rocknrollneverdied These were not made by rover. Honda produced this civic BEFORE rover began production of the 400 series. The honda civic was built by honda, on the honda production line (uk), using honda parts. Rover built the 400 at longbridge, using rover parts, and only used certain honda parts like brakes etc on the rover. Honda also produced the aerodeck (estate/tourer) version, and rover opted not to make an estate version. Every part of the civic is stamped "honda"

[Karjis]

@rocknrollneverdied Sorry, Rover has K-series engines in 400-series and Honda used their own engines (B and D-series. Only Diesel engine was K-series rover because honda didn't have own Diesel engine in 90's. And also basic design in 400-series rover is based older Honda Concerto if i'm not mistaken.

Doors and Interior parts are mainly only parts which can be swapped between honda civic and rover 416, also some pieces in suspension but not all.

[david01478]

@Karjis Honda and Rover went into partnership during the 80s/90s. They each owned 40% of each company IIRC. So they worked on designs and shared ideas between themselves. This was supposed to help Hondas market share in the UK and you are right they both used their own engines, however practically all of the others parts are identical. When Rover went into administration the 45/400 was never acquired by the Chinese as Honda still owned the rights to the design and the machinery in Longbridge.

[cossiepowerd]

iv got one of these, great cars!

[SPLATsaidNUFF]

@cossiepowerd doesnt look so in the video :D man, are u suicidal to drive this piece of shit?! :d

[coonish28]

These older civics weren't built to withstand any type of crash. they were very reliable and fun cars to drive but I sure wouldnt want to be in one in a t-bone car accident. Or any wreck for that matter

[dammyousuck]

fuck this civic i want the american EK civics their much nicer and better

[theturkishmania]

rest in peace in honda:D

[markowina]

does this car hawe fwd or rwd ??

[MrDreckspusher]

fwd

[marcus974ever]

@MrDreckspusher no swd:D

[corvetteboy10]

@markowina fwd i think

[YKNOMneknurD]

@markowina front

[DrNAYOMNIK]

it is actually a civic, but not aerodeck.

aerodeck is a wagon this is just a hatch, usually

called MA or MB (according to vin part that encodes body type - MA8-9 for original civic MB1 etc. for restyle - as on video and MC for wagon)

btw i have ma9 hatch ))

[Timico1977]

They did! I don´t know the correct name of the 5 door model (or it was indeed Civic 5d?!), but there was also an estate version of it, just google for "Civic Aerodeck". Don´t know if it was sold outside Europe, but it was quite identical to the Rover 400-series.

[duhabcdef]

That's not a civic WTF dude iv seen the 98 crash it did way better btw Honda never made a 4 door hatch in the 90s

[Lukeno52]

@duhabcdef No such thing as a 4dr hatch, it's 5dr, and oh yes, they most certainly did make a 5dr version.

[YKNOMneknurD]

@duhabcdef it is a civic i had the 1.8vti version of the car in the video, theres also lesser models like the 1.4i etc and the aerodeck

[pblackstone]

I wonder how fast the civic was going. My ins. co. retreived the airbags "black box" and estimated my crash in my 00 civic was extimated at 42 mph.

[camionetasgm]

ohhhhh, a rover 400! xD

[fdxnaoseinomes]

oh my i have one of 00

[FrightfulAccountant]

On the mark for a car of this time, in this class.

i didn't win safety awards, but it wasn't less safe then its rivals eighter. ;)