finding life on mars would have proven that life can start naturally (to creationists, real scientists already know it can because we have discovered life on earth) but not finding life on mars doesn't prove it impossible.
moreover, we DON'T know there's no life on mars, and scientists WEREN'T 'sure' that life would have existed on Mars in the past.
This is laughably unscientific in every sentence.
No wonder young earth creationists are the laughing stock of geology, astronomy, and biology
louie paster's experiment of one bottle uncontaminated by bacteria didn't prove that simple life can't form naturally from chemical origins, only that it doesn't happen easily. it's unlikely he had suitable chemicals, and most importantly, the magnitude of the experiment is laughably small.
The real origin of life had billions of years and all the matter/environments/chemical reactions in the universe, for a suitable self replicating molecule to begin evolution.
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke You’re a joke, you think that being bias to someone’s evidence because they happen to believe in GOD is OK, but it is blinding you to real science.
Go ahead and laugh all you want, but we’ll see who is laughing in the end. Just because you don’t believe there is a judgment day, doesn't mean there isn’t one.
Satan is the only one that wanted man to be an animal and he’s got you believing that’s what you are.
@tellnet Let me save you some time, every video on my channel is there to prove that GOD is real and that we are being taught lies. From the present model of the universe to energy and medical we at being lied to.
Ether go to another channel where they can confirm the lies you believe, or watch the videos you’re commenting on and debate me on the content of the videos.
Continue to just attack me and not the content of the videos and I’ll block you and delete your comments.
4 minutes in and I'm already repulsed, the speaker is claiming that since Biogenesis was disproven (that complex organisms like flies spontaneously appear from food sources), therefore Abiogenesis, that complex life only comes from complex life, also somehow applies to the simple beginnings of early life.
complex life like flies statistically can't form from inanimate matter, and this is meant to disprove the slow beginnings of simple life? silly
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke Anyone with an attention span of more than 5 or 10 minutes will realize that’s all the farther you got in the video. If you would have even bothered to read the information section you would see that believe it or not, real scientist from Colorado have done real research into how rock strata is formed, proving the current belief that rock strata takes millions of years to form is wrong.
That's the way real science works, but you just believe what ever you want.
finding life on mars would have proven that life can start naturally (to creationists, real scientists already know it can because we have discovered life on earth) but not finding life on mars doesn't prove it impossible.
moreover, we DON'T know there's no life on mars, and scientists WEREN'T 'sure' that life would have existed on Mars in the past.
This is laughably unscientific in every sentence.
No wonder young earth creationists are the laughing stock of geology, astronomy, and biology
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 2 months ago
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke Why don’t you comment on any of the videos I have pointed you to about the electrical universe?
I mean real physics and real electrical engineers, what would they know?
Real plasma laboratory experiments, that’s not the way science it done, is it?
Please tell me how real science is done, I didn’t know it was only done by mathematical formulas and assumptions.
davnxs 2 months ago
louie paster's experiment of one bottle uncontaminated by bacteria didn't prove that simple life can't form naturally from chemical origins, only that it doesn't happen easily. it's unlikely he had suitable chemicals, and most importantly, the magnitude of the experiment is laughably small.
The real origin of life had billions of years and all the matter/environments/chemical reactions in the universe, for a suitable self replicating molecule to begin evolution.
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 2 months ago
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke You’re a joke, you think that being bias to someone’s evidence because they happen to believe in GOD is OK, but it is blinding you to real science.
Go ahead and laugh all you want, but we’ll see who is laughing in the end. Just because you don’t believe there is a judgment day, doesn't mean there isn’t one.
Satan is the only one that wanted man to be an animal and he’s got you believing that’s what you are.
davnxs 2 months ago
@davnxs
You should be a farmer, David.
You are fairly fond of manure spreading.
tellnet 1 month ago
@tellnet Let me save you some time, every video on my channel is there to prove that GOD is real and that we are being taught lies. From the present model of the universe to energy and medical we at being lied to.
Ether go to another channel where they can confirm the lies you believe, or watch the videos you’re commenting on and debate me on the content of the videos.
Continue to just attack me and not the content of the videos and I’ll block you and delete your comments.
davnxs 1 month ago
Comment removed
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 2 months ago
4 minutes in and I'm already repulsed, the speaker is claiming that since Biogenesis was disproven (that complex organisms like flies spontaneously appear from food sources), therefore Abiogenesis, that complex life only comes from complex life, also somehow applies to the simple beginnings of early life.
complex life like flies statistically can't form from inanimate matter, and this is meant to disprove the slow beginnings of simple life? silly
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 2 months ago
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke Anyone with an attention span of more than 5 or 10 minutes will realize that’s all the farther you got in the video. If you would have even bothered to read the information section you would see that believe it or not, real scientist from Colorado have done real research into how rock strata is formed, proving the current belief that rock strata takes millions of years to form is wrong.
That's the way real science works, but you just believe what ever you want.
davnxs 2 months ago
Comment removed
grinsomx 8 months ago