He uses IRR as comparison!? to WACC. Truely a misunderstanding. Use the WACC to discount expected future Cash Flows and calculate NPV. E.g use NPV and not IRR.IRR does not differ between lending and borrowing, And it does NOT enable you to compare the profitability of different projects.
@Friis1966 Absolutely WACC and IRR are comparable in capital budgeting. In essence, the WACC, is the minimum hurdle rate for projects since that is the funding cost on a weighted average basis. The IRR is the internal rate of return of some project being analyzed. If the IRR > WACC, then invest in the project because it is returning more than it costs.
If IRR < WACC, that implies your project doesn’t return enough to meet the funding of that project and thus, will be unprofitable. IRR is the rate that will cause your future cash flows and your initial project cost to be equal to zero. You said it yourself – use the WACC to discount expected future cash flows and calculate NPV. And if such NPV is less than the project cost, then that means you will lose money.
This immediately implies that the IRR < NPV. Caveat of course is that this is all somewhat theorhetical and decisions are not solely made based on IRR and NPV. Before you post misleading comments, please do your HW first.
ty
makeiteasyable 2 months ago
nice video!
adelle0001 3 months ago
He uses IRR as comparison!? to WACC. Truely a misunderstanding. Use the WACC to discount expected future Cash Flows and calculate NPV. E.g use NPV and not IRR.IRR does not differ between lending and borrowing, And it does NOT enable you to compare the profitability of different projects.
Friis1966 1 year ago
@Friis1966 Absolutely WACC and IRR are comparable in capital budgeting. In essence, the WACC, is the minimum hurdle rate for projects since that is the funding cost on a weighted average basis. The IRR is the internal rate of return of some project being analyzed. If the IRR > WACC, then invest in the project because it is returning more than it costs.
wstss 1 year ago 2
If IRR < WACC, that implies your project doesn’t return enough to meet the funding of that project and thus, will be unprofitable. IRR is the rate that will cause your future cash flows and your initial project cost to be equal to zero. You said it yourself – use the WACC to discount expected future cash flows and calculate NPV. And if such NPV is less than the project cost, then that means you will lose money.
wstss 1 year ago
This immediately implies that the IRR < NPV. Caveat of course is that this is all somewhat theorhetical and decisions are not solely made based on IRR and NPV. Before you post misleading comments, please do your HW first.
wstss 1 year ago
@wstss OWNEDDDD!
ssutunti 1 year ago
Shoudn't you add 40% intead of deacreasing the amount?
sircwaniak 1 year ago
this guy is money!
olipop84 1 year ago
excellent introduction to WACC
kasunrajapaksha 1 year ago
nice clear clear clear and simple as possible
Deerok4Dragon7 1 year ago
Nice presentation, thanks
ksadreams 2 years ago
Thanks a lot you are a very precious help keep up the good work, i wish you all the best.
airwaterdirt 2 years ago