That's not a skirt, it's a kilt. Kilts are MADE FOR MEN. They ARE male attire. And once u get some experience and age under your belt you will see Kilts are SEXY AS H*LL !!!!! Gawking is allowed but ridiculing isn't. (P.S I agree with Austinmx. . . . .your hat does suck.) KILTED MEN ROCK !!!!!!
I was wearing a black Utilikilt on a cruise, I heard a teen girl yell out.."That guy is in a skirt"..I then said "Hey look, that girl is wearing pants"..She shut up after that. Yes im the same guy (david301013717), differnt screenename.
Like, the point here is illustrated by the girl who turns up her nose at the concept of guys wearing skirts and/or kilts, while she presumably would think nothing of girls wearing pants. Would she presumably still think that guys should not be allowed to wear skirts and/or kilts if that also meant that she was not allowed to wear them? Girls have pushed for equality for some time; now so are the guys. We are finally beginning to have true equality. It's been way overdue. Way to go, babes!
O YEA SO WHAT IF HES WEARING IT WHO CARES IM MEAN WOMANS ARE NOT BOSSES OF SKIRTS OR DRESSES AND + IF U TOOK A MAN WEARING A SKIRT IT FEELS BETTER TO WEAR SKIRTS THAN TO WEAR PANTS MAN+WOMAN=MAN IN DRESS OR SKIRT TY PLZ REPLAY MR.LADY xD
A kilt will always be a specific subcategory in the master category of skirts. Yes, all kilts are skirts, regardless that they were intended for men's use. A flat front and pin/buckle to right have no correlation to male sexual anatomy. Greeks wear a skirt pleated in front and they don't agree that pleats across the front make it "female." DON'T DO BUSINESS WITH ANYONE WHO INSISTS KILTS ARE NOT SKIRTS. THEY ARE DISHONEST.
Call it a kilt till the Grand Canyon is gone. But saying kilts aren't skirts is like saying Mustangs aren't Fords. It's like saying, I'm a Texan--not an American. Category and subcategory. Why can't you see that? Anything that hangs from the waist and encloses the legs together is a skirt---whatever else it is called. I can also insist, "It isn't Scotland--it's Caledonia." Don't you see these denials are evasive word games? Even Kinloch Anderson admitted kilts are skirts.
Your argument hinges on a detail, call it a skirt if you like, the correct name for that particular type of skirt is a kilt. Regardless I still await the apology for accusing me of being dishonest.
Rudeness is bad manners however you justify it.
and you still need to calm down, no-one cares what you call it, call it an unbifurcated garment if you like, it would at least be technically correct ;)
I will re-phrase. Persons who say kilts are not skirts are in denial of fact. All caps did not signify I was hyped, it was for emphasis. Look what the Greeks wear. They can say, "it's not a skirt, it's a fustanella," and that does not alter its essence. The word, in fact, means "little skirt," little as in, not ankle length, as what women wear. So to them a sex difference, arbitrarily established, is mere length. In the Revolution they were ankle length, and they forgot that.
Rephrase all you want, you made a statement suggesting I was dishonest and people should not deal with me. I find that extraordinarily rude and arrogant based on one comment stating that the correct name for that garment is a kilt, you may well argue that it is a subset of the group of garments some would call skirts, fair enough, but as you clearly don't have the manners to apologise for attacking the integrity of someone you have never met I see little point in continuing a discussion with you
It was a generic comment you took specifically. If kilts are skirts---and they are---can those who insist otherwise be trusted in other areas? Now this is a question, downgraded from an accusation. I say, yes, usually they can be trusted in areas they are not in denial about. And as the Mexicans say, adios.
wake up girls...its the 21st century. things are changing in this world.
Hemitom2004 1 month ago
Dear Child,
That's not a skirt, it's a kilt. Kilts are MADE FOR MEN. They ARE male attire. And once u get some experience and age under your belt you will see Kilts are SEXY AS H*LL !!!!! Gawking is allowed but ridiculing isn't. (P.S I agree with Austinmx. . . . .your hat does suck.) KILTED MEN ROCK !!!!!!
Bithiah55 10 months ago
MEN ARE FIGHTING FOR THERE FASHION FREEDOM.
Stallion8057 1 year ago
I was wearing a black Utilikilt on a cruise, I heard a teen girl yell out.."That guy is in a skirt"..I then said "Hey look, that girl is wearing pants"..She shut up after that. Yes im the same guy (david301013717), differnt screenename.
kilteddave1 1 year ago
OI! THAT BE A KILT YOU SILLY LAD!
vDIABETICvHEROv 1 year ago
kilt
xXAustinMXx 1 year ago
Looks good from what i can see. Also, your hat sucks.
tainteddeity 1 year ago
Like, the point here is illustrated by the girl who turns up her nose at the concept of guys wearing skirts and/or kilts, while she presumably would think nothing of girls wearing pants. Would she presumably still think that guys should not be allowed to wear skirts and/or kilts if that also meant that she was not allowed to wear them? Girls have pushed for equality for some time; now so are the guys. We are finally beginning to have true equality. It's been way overdue. Way to go, babes!
pantyflash 2 years ago
ignorance is bliss.
aquaticworld1 2 years ago
O YEA SO WHAT IF HES WEARING IT WHO CARES IM MEAN WOMANS ARE NOT BOSSES OF SKIRTS OR DRESSES AND + IF U TOOK A MAN WEARING A SKIRT IT FEELS BETTER TO WEAR SKIRTS THAN TO WEAR PANTS MAN+WOMAN=MAN IN DRESS OR SKIRT TY PLZ REPLAY MR.LADY xD
killerman246 2 years ago
today a saw a woman wearing trousers - yes really ,-)
tambopata65 2 years ago 11
i use skirt too . it nice
xshiguemitsuct 2 years ago
1, So what? You wear trousers
2. That particular man is wearing a kilt not a skirt... go look it up!
Smudgegs 2 years ago
A kilt will always be a specific subcategory in the master category of skirts. Yes, all kilts are skirts, regardless that they were intended for men's use. A flat front and pin/buckle to right have no correlation to male sexual anatomy. Greeks wear a skirt pleated in front and they don't agree that pleats across the front make it "female." DON'T DO BUSINESS WITH ANYONE WHO INSISTS KILTS ARE NOT SKIRTS. THEY ARE DISHONEST.
skirts365 2 years ago
1. I'm not selling anything
2. I resent being called dishonest for giving something it's correct name
3. I'm Scots, I wear a kilt, I don't tell you what to call your national costume, perhaps manners would dictate you extend me the same courtesy?
3. Calm down ffs ;)
Smudgegs 2 years ago
Call it a kilt till the Grand Canyon is gone. But saying kilts aren't skirts is like saying Mustangs aren't Fords. It's like saying, I'm a Texan--not an American. Category and subcategory. Why can't you see that? Anything that hangs from the waist and encloses the legs together is a skirt---whatever else it is called. I can also insist, "It isn't Scotland--it's Caledonia." Don't you see these denials are evasive word games? Even Kinloch Anderson admitted kilts are skirts.
skirts365 2 years ago
Your argument hinges on a detail, call it a skirt if you like, the correct name for that particular type of skirt is a kilt. Regardless I still await the apology for accusing me of being dishonest.
Rudeness is bad manners however you justify it.
and you still need to calm down, no-one cares what you call it, call it an unbifurcated garment if you like, it would at least be technically correct ;)
Smudgegs 2 years ago
I will re-phrase. Persons who say kilts are not skirts are in denial of fact. All caps did not signify I was hyped, it was for emphasis. Look what the Greeks wear. They can say, "it's not a skirt, it's a fustanella," and that does not alter its essence. The word, in fact, means "little skirt," little as in, not ankle length, as what women wear. So to them a sex difference, arbitrarily established, is mere length. In the Revolution they were ankle length, and they forgot that.
skirts365 2 years ago
Rephrase all you want, you made a statement suggesting I was dishonest and people should not deal with me. I find that extraordinarily rude and arrogant based on one comment stating that the correct name for that garment is a kilt, you may well argue that it is a subset of the group of garments some would call skirts, fair enough, but as you clearly don't have the manners to apologise for attacking the integrity of someone you have never met I see little point in continuing a discussion with you
Smudgegs 2 years ago
It was a generic comment you took specifically. If kilts are skirts---and they are---can those who insist otherwise be trusted in other areas? Now this is a question, downgraded from an accusation. I say, yes, usually they can be trusted in areas they are not in denial about. And as the Mexicans say, adios.
skirts365 2 years ago
No it was a comment in direct reply to my initial comment. To use your own words "don't you see these denials are evasive word games?"
End of, Goodbye.
Smudgegs 2 years ago
Whats wrong with that?..No differnt then you wearing pants..
david301013717 3 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
Why should a man do not wear a skirt if the women are allowed to wear trousers. Where is the much said emancipation?
Emancipation begins not with the women, but only times in our heads.
TVClaudia 3 years ago