Sen. Barr because Dr. Paul isn't interested in the presidency anymore. Besides Paul never said anything ill about Barr. There is no such thing as the perfect candidate.
We know that all the 3rd party Candidates out there are fully superior choices to the Obama Mccain chaos.
Thats all we need to know, the choice is quite easy to understand , whatever you do
Make sure you encourage every Voter to simply vote the 3rd party candidate they like ! Do NOT reward Mccain or Obama with your vote, they've done Nothing to deserve it, both men will change nothing
Ron Paul is having a convention at the same time as the Republican Convention. Though I doubt this will happen, it would be interesting if Paul indorsed the Libertarian Party because he has stated he will not run as an independent. That would unify the Libertarian movement and Barr could receive as much as 15% or more of the vote. Also, Paul's donations might be better spent with a candidate that is on the ballot. It all depends on what Paul decides to do.
Are you kidding me? A moderator is supposed to set the tone for the panel, not spend 60% of the time speaking himself. He's less a moderator and more a glorified panelist, with the exception that no one cares what he thinks as we're here for the panel.
No one is asking to be "entertained". We're asking that the moderator shut the hell up and let the panelists share their perspective.
Granted, he did ramble on a bit (apparently he has something to sell), but he only spoke approximately 8 and a half minutes throughout the entire 49 minute piece (I didn't count the last part since it wasn't part of the "debate").
More like 15% rather than 60%, but still more than the usual moderator.
The stupid moderator talked too damn much, and they ran out of time before anyone else could address the last question about the Line Item Veto...
I thought for SURE that Bob Barr would come out with guns blazing on that one as a distortion of the Contitutional balance of power toward the Executive.
I now have the contacts for all the major news channels in my channel's description. Everybody write to them and tell them their coverage is incomplete without the 3rd party candidates being included, and that it is undermining the spirit of our nation.
we need to concentrate on individual states and elect positions from the bottom up:
city council
state legislature
state senate
governor
Once we have several small states under our belt then we can expand our base. It has to be a concentrated effort.
shakaama 2 years ago
i was naked while I watched this video! P
biutz 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
g uhh wow this video has 2 be one of the Silliest and sexiest vids online. just like me! l
blizzardz245 3 years ago
Right On the money Video!
apks2004 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL CONSERVATIVES refuse to vote for John McCain!
REAL CONSERVATIVES are voting for Bob Barr (ultra-conservative from Georgia) for President !!!
Bob Barr will be on the ballot in 50 states.
blueguise23 3 years ago
Sen. Barr because Dr. Paul isn't interested in the presidency anymore. Besides Paul never said anything ill about Barr. There is no such thing as the perfect candidate.
MRLarkin 3 years ago 6
We know that all the 3rd party Candidates out there are fully superior choices to the Obama Mccain chaos.
Thats all we need to know, the choice is quite easy to understand , whatever you do
Make sure you encourage every Voter to simply vote the 3rd party candidate they like ! Do NOT reward Mccain or Obama with your vote, they've done Nothing to deserve it, both men will change nothing
2connection 3 years ago 2
So true
DMWestWoodElite 3 years ago
I can't decide whether to vote Bob Barr, or write in Ron Paul.
Will it really matter either way?
NoLiesJustLove82 3 years ago 3
I'd vote Barr because it will push the Libertarian Party up into the limelight a little more.
hut141 3 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I fucking hate when he calls those dates,"Twenty-o-four"- Just stfu.
penexpers 3 years ago
Ron Paul or Bob Barr !!!!!!!!
myanchoragealaska 3 years ago 8
Ron Paul is having a convention at the same time as the Republican Convention. Though I doubt this will happen, it would be interesting if Paul indorsed the Libertarian Party because he has stated he will not run as an independent. That would unify the Libertarian movement and Barr could receive as much as 15% or more of the vote. Also, Paul's donations might be better spent with a candidate that is on the ballot. It all depends on what Paul decides to do.
Either way...
FREEDOM '08
poprockssuck87 3 years ago 4
BARR PAUL 08
DMWestWoodElite 3 years ago
The Nat'l debate really should be between Barr & Barack.
McCain, I can't help but believe, will come across as an old forgetful coot. (Of course FAUX will excuse anything McCain says or does).
DillonX 3 years ago 4
ron paul is an idea
blargen3141 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hey bob be a ross perot and screw this country with your worthless run for president
bswift5 3 years ago
Wow... this dude is quite possibly the worst moderator I have ever seen.
isurlc2 3 years ago
That's yet another problem with America. We want to be entertained rather than listen to the message.
If it doesn't come in a pretty package, we don't want it.
Disappointing.
SugarMonkey528 3 years ago 3
Are you kidding me? A moderator is supposed to set the tone for the panel, not spend 60% of the time speaking himself. He's less a moderator and more a glorified panelist, with the exception that no one cares what he thinks as we're here for the panel.
No one is asking to be "entertained". We're asking that the moderator shut the hell up and let the panelists share their perspective.
ls1z28chris 3 years ago
Granted, he did ramble on a bit (apparently he has something to sell), but he only spoke approximately 8 and a half minutes throughout the entire 49 minute piece (I didn't count the last part since it wasn't part of the "debate").
More like 15% rather than 60%, but still more than the usual moderator.
SugarMonkey528 3 years ago
no speaker number 1, Ronald regan did not invent conservatism.
KarateKidX 3 years ago 2
AAARRRGHH!!!
The stupid moderator talked too damn much, and they ran out of time before anyone else could address the last question about the Line Item Veto...
I thought for SURE that Bob Barr would come out with guns blazing on that one as a distortion of the Contitutional balance of power toward the Executive.
THE HOUSE CONTROLS THE PURSE STRINGS -- PERIOD.
klaptongroovemaster 3 years ago 5
very nice we have audio
SaveOurSovereignty2 3 years ago
Whoa... long vid. I'll need a beer and a pizza to finish this one.
(I finished 18 minutes when I typed this)
Weapon01 3 years ago 2
Great discussion.
Thanks for reposting this.
Good stuff here.
On a side note, the moderator needs a sock on that mike
harryogre 3 years ago
Way to go Bob!
I now have the contacts for all the major news channels in my channel's description. Everybody write to them and tell them their coverage is incomplete without the 3rd party candidates being included, and that it is undermining the spirit of our nation.
becolt 3 years ago 2
... and you think that will work?
We begged, screamed, waved signs and even chased them down with snowballs. Nothing worked.
They do not care, what the public wants! But good luck to you, i hope your efforts are rewarding!
Signzit 3 years ago
can you send me them please!!!
NEOCONIDIOTS 3 years ago
I am first to Watch AGAIN!!!!
peacemaker92064 3 years ago