A new poll shows GOP challenger Sharron Angle heads into Election Day with the potential of pulling off the single biggest upset of the election cycle.
The Mason-Dixon Polling & Research survey shows Angle with the support of 49 percent of Nevada voters compared with 45 percent who say they back Reid. Momentum has moved in Angle’s direction as she has expanded her lead from 47-45 percent in the last poll the firm released.
BYE-BYE HARRY ... and GOOD RIDDANCE you slimy TRAITOR!
Sharron Angle is just saying her opinion on abortion. Abortion should not be a form of birth control. I'm sorry but most of the time you could have said yes or no and innocent life shouldn't have to be killed just because you decided to not practice safe sex. She is a little extreme on views of rape and incest but that's her views of abortion. She will benefit NV. I'm a Nevadan and Harry Reid has done absolutely nothing to benefit NV.
@Antonio33s Would be nice if the bitch could actually speak instead of running from the media. Did you hear the machine gun comment? Did you hear the one about the constitution? She thinks her imaginary god should run the country.
so if a mentally ill man who lets say had aids and crabs AND BED BUGS! for being homeless raped her then she would keep that child and love it and cherish it cause that was gods gift? CALLING ALL MENTALLY ILL MEN FREE COUCHIE AT SHARON ANGLES HOUSE
This election is not one to lose sight of PRAGMATIC concerns. Democrats serving FOREIGN NATIONALS HERE ILLEGALLY certainly don't have the best interests of our own country at heart. So how could we realistically expect them to vote for the candidate that would do the least harm? Reid's agenda would be greatly harmful to our country's economy. Giving illegals amnesty and everything else, as he's trying to do, would only encourage a lot more job-stealing illegals to come here to pillage us.
The taking of human life is morally wrong, except in cases to save the life of the mother, when it comes to human life before birth. Or in cases of self-defense or in defense of loved ones. Other than that, the taking of human life is morally unjustifiable. And in most cases, unborn babies are killed for not much more reason than because a selfish poor excuse for a human female didn't want her social life cramped by having to hire a babysitter. Angle is right to oppose taking human life.
Life in the womb is sacred, life inside gets God's okay, once out here it's a little sketchy. According to Catholic teaching, aborting a baby to save the mother is NOT okay. For ectopic pregnancy the woman may have surgery removing the tube, the death of the baby which would have died anyway is indirect. She is not allowed to take an abortifacient to kill the baby and save the mother. Wonder how Angle will feel in 20 years when the Catholic Latino population surges and is the majority.
@kimzeynkink, you're LYING. The Catholic church doesn't say that. Only in cases to save the life of the mother do they allow the baby's life to be forfeited.
@tncdel KNOW your catechism. Abortion is always wrong! Removing a uterus that is cancerous but contains a fetus is okay because the point is not to kill the baby but to save the mother. Ectopic pregnancy I already explained. You cannot kill the baby to save the mother without committing a mortal sin. The intent must never be to kill the baby. You are ignorant of Catholic teaching. Look up St Gianna, she was made a saint for dying rather than aborting her baby. Check out Catholic answers 4 truth!
@kimzeynkink, that was recognition for doing something so noble, made even more so because it was not required of her by her religion. That is also the only moral situation where a mother has the right to "choice."
@tncdel To purposefully kill a baby is mortal sin always! If the baby dies as a by-product of a life-saving procedure as in removing a uterus or fallopian tube, that is not a sin even if the baby dies. But to leave the body intact and only kill the baby, that is abortion and it is a mortal sin. Do you see the difference here? A baby can die indirectly from action to save the mother, but to merely kill the baby because some doctor says the pregnancy is high risk is a mortal sin.
@kimzeynkink, any baby removed to save the life of a mother that dies is acceptable by the Catholic church as being no sin. If the baby is later than about 4 1/2 months after conception, it has a chance to survive, even if kept alive by assistance. Many adults would do if they had no access to life-sustaining technology.
@tncdel NOPE! Not if you remove it by abortive means ! Not if you intend to kill the baby. You may deliver a baby early to save the life of the mother, and if the child dies, that isn't abortion, but if you tear it to pieces to do so or if you scramble its brains that is not acceptable. Abortion is never acceptable. Go back and study the faith especially the pro-life teachings because you are erring.
@kimzeynkink, I said it is acceptable to take the life of the unborn baby in order to save the life of the mother. If you want to call that abortion, or simply loss of life in the process of saving life, that is a semantical technicality irrelevant to what is actually the situation. All I know is that the Catholic church allows it.
@tncdel Not a semantical technicality. Catholic church never allows the INTENTIONAL sacrifice or killing of a baby. Nope! If the baby dies as an UNINTENDED consequence that is sad but not a sin. You brush it off on semantics, while the Church is very specific. I think you don't like being mistaken and rather than admitting the true teaching of the Catholic Church, you play with semantics. If that is not the case then you are willfully ignorant of Catholic teaching. EOM 4 ever
1.) I disagree with you about what the Catholic church allows. Unless you speak with someone at the U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops and get a definitive answer, I will not concede simply on your say-so that they don't allow abortion to save the life of the mother, as I said.
2.) I really don't give a flyin' fig what the Catholic church says, since I already disagree with them that birth control isn't permissible. For there is nothing morally wrong with preventing conception.
@tncdel Thought you might be interested that the only type of birth control allowed in the Catholic faith in abstinence aka sexual continence. Even if the mother's life is in danger were she to conceive, it would be a mortal sin to contracept. If her husband really loves her he will abstain from sex, masturbation and a non-conjugal sex with the wife and adultery as are all mortal sins. I love the Catholic faith and study it endlessly.
@kimzeynkink, no, I'm not going for it. Phone the U.S. Council of Bishops, then ask them for clarification. They will tell you that if it's necessary to save the life of the mother, THAT'S the only exception. The only exception the Catholic church accepts is to kill IN SELF-DEFENSE. That's allowed.
P.S.
I went through 12 grades of Catholic schools and almost became clergy, so I'm well-versed in Catholic teachings. I'm not into mysticism now.
@tncdel the clarification will be that you cannot intend to kill the baby! You cannot have an abortion! You may remove a part of the mother's body that contains the problem and the by-product is the death of the fetus, but you cannot merely kill the fetus. Example given is to remove the fallopian tube in ectopic pregnancy is okay but to leave the tube and to use an abortifacient is a mortal sin. The act to save the mother must not be a direct killing of the baby! Direct abortion always wrong!
Another proof the law is wrong is that, not only is it deemed murder if a woman kills her baby two days after being born artificially by Caesarean just 5 months after conception, but also if someone assaults a pregnant woman causing her to lose the baby, in many states the assailant can be charged with MURDER.
Now how is the state going to recognize it as murder, as it is, but not if the woman does it herself? That's crazy! Screwball Roe v. Wade threw the law out of balance.
Pro-abortionists are screwballs trying to rationalize that which cannot be justified by ethics. The scales of justice must be weighed. Only in the case of when it's necessary to save the life of the mother is it ethically permissible to take the life of the child.
I read a report of a mother who adamantly refused to allow doctors to kill her baby in order to save her own life. The maternal instinct to protect her young at all cost was so strong that she sacrificed her own life to save her baby
Approximately 4 million American babies are born every year. If the AAFP data* is accurate and spontaneous abortion really affects up to 20% of recognized pregnancies, then we can do the math and conclude that--following Angle's logic about God having a plan for each one of us--God kills up to 1 million American "unborns" every year.
Such a nice fellow, this God guy.
*(Management of Spontaneous Abortion, CRAIG P. GRIEBEL, M.D. et al, Am Fam Physician.2005 Oct1;72(7):1243-1250.)
@Mbalakala, fuck that religious nonsense. I'm not into mysticism, yet I deem human life sacred. And no one has the right to "play God" taking another's life. Pro-abortionists resort to lying and subterfuge to rationalize brutally murdering innocent unborn babies. They use "choice" as a euphemism for murder, similar to how the Nazis called it "cleansing." Same thing, different holocaust.
And it's not about a woman's "choice" as to what to do with her own body. It's THE BABY'S BODY.
@tncdel so a spontaneous abortion is a "brutal murder of an innocent baby" performed by nature?
You say they use connotational euphemisms in order to mislead, but you use the words "brutal murder of an innocent baby". You assume that the procedure is brutal, that it is murder, that the embryo is a baby... and that if it were guilty of something then there wouldnt be a problem? (otherwise it wouldnt make sense to use the word "innocent")
Maybe we should tone down the rethoric a little bit?
@Mbalakala, I'm not into playing word games. If you want to call a MISCARRIAGE a "spontaneous abortion," you can do so, but it's inaccurate. An abortion is artificially contrived murder. Of course it's brutal. A doctor violating his/ her Hippocratic oath [to do no harm] rips the baby's arms and legs off, before crushing the skull then suctioning away the grisly dismembered corpse. How much more barbarically brutal can it get?
@tncdel "Spontaneous abortion" is a commonly used term among the scientific community, so is miscarriage. A quick pubmed search returns 15.455 results.
I'm looking at a human embryo right now and I don't see arms or a head. Are you talking about late-term abortion? I agree that the law must draw the line at some point of development. Several criteria have been proposed. I don't have an opinion about the line drawing.
However, you seemed to think it's murder from conception. Is that the case?
@Mbalakala, no, in order to respect human life, we must follow the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution. Otherwise you violate the 5th Amendment Due Pricees clause by being arbitrary. Such as arbitrarily "playing God" with an artificially imposed time where, voila, respect for human life "magically" happens. That's BS. Each and every one of us began at the moment of conception. If you say at 5 months it's a human life, that's ridiculous. Why not 4 months and 3 weeks, and so on ...?
@tncdel Calm down, I was just asking you a question. You could have just responded, "yes, I think abortion is murder from conception". However, as I told you, I don't see arms or a head in the embryo I was looking at earlier.
You see, some people don't think an 12-cell embryo (some of which would serve to form a placenta later on) meets the requirements for personhood, according to their criteria. Now you should make your case for the personhood from conception.
@Mbalakala, within 24 hours of conception by then it has already formed over a million cells. It went beyond 12 cells within an hour after fertilization. You can stick that "personhood" BS where the Sun don't shine, where it belongs. I'm not going there. It's human life, with its own unique DNA different than the mother's from the moment of conception. Life develops from conception to adulthood. Even a teenager at puberty is still developing. And some teenagers aren't really "viable" either. :)~
ehm, maybe you should check your facts there? Until the stage of 16 cell morula is reached, every division last about 20 hours. The morula stage is reached about 70 hours post conception.
I understand that you see DNA as all you need to be considered a human being. That's fine, although in my opinion a human person is more than that. Anyway, following your standard, are you concerned about 1 million babies dead by spontaneous abortion every year?
@Mbalakala, I'm not going for that definition you're trying to use. That's "playing God," by arbitrarily assigning a specific time when you will recognize that it is HUMAN LIFE, no matter what, from conception. You also try using the most extreme examples, to grease your sleazy arguments, when in fact very few abortions are perpetrated before 6 to 8 weeks, and some as late as over 8 months after conception. A woman doesn't even know she's pregnant when it's as early as you said.
@tncdel you're saying it's a brutal murder of a baby from day 1 and I am the extreme one?
I was just trying to understand your argument for "it's murder from conception". I'm not trying to convince you. You are entitled to your own opinions. It's ok. Really.
Though I don't really think you're interested in someone else's opinion, I'd say that having a particular genome isn't enough to me, because our genome does not define who we are as persons. Classic example, identical twins.
@Mbalakala, I've already made it clear I won't argue this on your terms. You keep trying to sucker me in with a definition. Trying "baby" and "persons" definitions. But such definitions are JUDGMENTAL, assigned arbitrarily. What you call human life at a certain point in its development will differ from someone else's opinion. I'm not into semantic word games that frame an artificial argument, as you're trying to pull. The terminology I use keeps it indisputable. Namely: HUMAN LIFE.
@tncdel "Trying "baby" and "persons" definitions.
Excuse me, weren't you the one that used to say "it's a brutal murder of an innocent baby"? I don't consider a morula as a baby at all, I tought that was clear enough from my comments...
In fact, I've been using widely accepted terms among the scientific community all along, like "embryo", "morula", "spontaneous abortion"... while you have been using words like "murder" and "baby". Will you deny that?
@Mbalakala, keeping the issue simple avoids losing focus by getting sidetracked on word games. And that also prevents you from winning the argument. For there is no way you can refute the fact that it is HUMAN LIFE. For it is definitely alive, and growing by leaps and bounds. And it certainly was of HUMAN parentage, not dogs or cats or any other species. Again, I assert that anyone who lacks respect for human life, whatever the stage of its development, has a character flaw. Something lacking.
@tncdel so shouldn't you be concerned about 1 million american human lives lost every year by spontaneous abortion? Shouldn't that count as a natural catastrophe or something? In the San Francisco earthquake only about 3,000 people died and yet it's considered as pretty bad body count. Think about it. 1,000,000 dead every year.
Source: Management of Spontaneous Abortion. CRAIG P. GRIEBEL, M.D. et al. Am Fam Physician. 2005 Oct 1;72(7):1243-1250.
@Mbalakala, perhaps you're morbidly fascinated with such things as naturally-occurring pre-natal deaths. But I think you should stay focused on the actual point I made "way back when." Namely: that Angle, although not a perfect candidate, is still not as bad as Reid. As I pointed out earlier, those who quibble about what they call her "extremist" views, those things stand no chance at becoming reality. Whereas, what Reid's trying to slip past voters [amnesty and the Dream Act] could very well be
@tncdel LOL. This guys delusional. Its nothing like Nazis. Last time I checked, the people the Nazis killed were actually cognizant, and didn't rely on someones umbilical cord to breathe. So good ahead and put that Nazi "argument" to bed, and come back with a real one...
@RavenMichaels, "cognizant?" Even before birth a baby is "cognizant." But that isn't the sole criteria. Hell, I'm sure the Nazis experimented by sedating their victims too. Does that make it any less murder because Nazis sedated someone before killing them? No. It's even murder to kill someone in a coma not brain dead. Put your pro-abortion BS to bed. The Nazi holocaust is quite "awake."
@tncdel Theirs a major difference between a Jew in a Concentration Camp, and something that isn't even self-aware and has to rely on an umbilical cord to breathe.
This is seriously scary. God has a plan involving women getting raped by their family members? So it makes it okay? Thats some serial killer thinking right there. Its the kind of logic someone like Timothy McVeigh would use...
@RavenMichaels, fail. Less than one half of one percent of abortions are done for rape. The overwhelming majority of abortions are done for not much more reason than because a heartless poor excuse for a female parent didn't want her social life cramped by having to hire a babysitter. But even in a case of rape, two wrongs don't make a right. And it is an even greater wrong to kill an innocent unborn baby.
Only to save the life of the mother is it ethical to kill the baby. No other reason.
@tncdel Fail? Uh, no. Maybe you should process it some more. It doesn't matter if its half a percent (even though I'm sure you pulled that number from nothing) of the amount of abortions. She STILL thinks that half a percent is should be forced to have the baby, and that God has a plan for it...
@RavenMichaels, why is it I'm not even into mysticism, and deem all religion as utter nonsense, yet I respect human life and you don't? You think it's okay to "play God." Well, I don't. You're selfish, like females who want to kill their babies before birth.
@tncdel@tncdel Until that baby is born, its part of the woman, and they have a choice. However, I'd never fully respect someone who would wait till like, the last few months to do it. But early on, no, that "LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION" nonsense is ridiculous. Its like you guys have written a bad screenplay, and you have to write around the plot holes. Stop using that hacky argument...
@RavenMichaels, that was one of the dumbest statements I've ever read here on youtube: "Until that baby is born, its part of the woman." Ignorance is a motherfucker, isn't it? It's a shame you never took a basic high school level course in Biology. It would have saved you from embarrassing yourself like that. :(
@tweethang1 I am at a loss with respect to understanding anything you say. You jump from one issue to another without any reasonable connection. Christians, Soldiers, Iraq, Bodies.... Jesus Christ!
@tweethang1 What does our soldiers - who are withdrawing from Iraq - have to do with Angle's abortion position? And, as I said before, I am not a Christian, not that there is anything wrong with being one.
You really have a fascination with the Salem Witch Trials. Have you seen a doctor about your obsession?
@tweethang1 Normally, I don't respond to cunts who don't know the difference between YOUR and you are. However, I felt compelled to correct one of your erroneous assumptions, which is, that I am a Christian. I am not. Regardless, let me assert my firm belief that a child conceived outside the bounds of a blessed holy-union should not be automatically murdered because of it.
Sharron Angle: "God has a plan and a purpose for each one of our lives"
This is His plan, from the American Academy of Family Physicians website:
"Spontaneous abortion, which is the loss of a pregnancy without outside intervention before 20 weeks’ gestation, affects up to 20 percent of recognized pregnancies."
"Im white. Male. age 27 and Im into witchcraft and the dark arts. I do tarot readings in my spare time and I also use a ouija board and I dabble in some other stuff."
I think your self-description says enough about your intelligence. Anyone who practices witchcraft is a faggot, needless to say. lol!
She tries to sound profound, when in fact, she is an imbecile. She contradicts everything she says, especially now because she is desperate for votes; her future loss is inevitable and she knows it.
On this, I am with Angle. It is assumed that she is saying that God wants the baby to be born. This is not necessarily the case, as God could easily cause the woman to miscarriage the baby. Besides, is it the child's fault that s/he was conceived under less than ideal circumstances? Then, why hold it responsible by murdering it?
@koatzz "Besides, is it the child's fault that s/he was conceived under less than ideal circumstances? Then, why hold it responsible by murdering it?"
Fundamentalist Christians also believe that if a child dies while it is below the age of accountability (13), it goes straight on to heaven - no having to live a life wherein it might sin and thus go to hell. Angle's lot want to be free of government intervention but don't mind intervening when it's something they believe in.
@LoraSinger The issue is whethr abortion is the natural death of the unborn, or sanitized murder? To many it is premeditated murder. And, although I agree w/your analysis of Christian doctrine w/respect 2 pre-teen death, it doesn't address the issue of whether a person has the right 2 murder the unborn. In the majority of cases, govrnmnt subsidizes the cost of abortion. The removal of government's stealthy endorsemnt of abortion via subsidies is, above all else, the crux of Angle's descent.
@koatzz - Of course abortion is not natural death but the case becomes fuzzy where there is the POTENTIAL for life but at the stage it is terminated, it is a clump of a few hundred cells. I would certainly not agree with abortion in the latter stages of gestation. There is also the question of how far one group can go to impose their beliefs on others who do not share them. Those who have abortions are certainly not a danger to the general community.
@LoraSinger - The procedure should be in place like any other for those that need it. Those that don't agree with it are not pressured into having one certainly. As far as government subsidization, you must remember that these people are also tax payers and I'm sure that there are public services in place which you enjoy for which their tax dollars go.
@LoraSinger 3) I find it interesting that the very people who decry what they call excessive government intervention in people's personal affairs are the same people who are pressuring to do exactly the same thing themselves.
It doesn't make any sense. Why woudn't you abort in the case of the mother's mortality? There will be either two cases:
1) both the mother and the child will die, thus making the argument against abortion (i.e. saving the life of the baby) moot, or
2) The mother will die, but the child can somehow be saved. Yeah, I'm sure that baby will have a great time growing up without his/her genetic mother there in his/her life.
Oh, wait, I forgot, it's probably God's plan that this would happen.
God forbid that anyone want children in this world to live life and have a chance like the rest of us. What if Keith's mom told him he was almost aborted? Then all you liberals wouldnt have your snide, trash talking idol to watch every night. Angle's reason for believing abortion should be illegal is honest and heartfelt. Does that mean she is going to write up a bill to make it illegal? NO! People should stick to the POLITICAL issues not social.
@MrGOPERA, you are right. All these ridiculous attacks against Sharron Angle just demonstrate how desperate progressives are to defeat Sharron Angle.
The more progressives demonize someone, however, the more that person will be able to help us defend ourselves -- and our children and grandchildren -- from Obama, Reid and Pelosi and their job-killing, economy-killing, freedom-killing scams like Obamacare and cap and trade.
@Antonio33s she is already defeated, you must related to her for all this cheap advertising you do for her. If she wasn't CHEAP, she would pay for real advertising, not your stupid shit.
Angle can't save us from anyone or anything. The GOP lost girly boy and it's time you woke up and smelt the roses.
We Will All Vote for Harry Reid, the man who helped make Affordable Care Act, so we will be protected from insurance
Out of more than 600 laws of Moses, none comments on abortion. One Mosaic law about miscarriage specifically contradicts the claim that the bible is antiabortion, clearly stating that miscarriage does not involve the death of a human being. If a woman has a miscarriage as the result of a fight, the man who caused it should be fined. If the woman dies, however, the culprit must be killed:
@LoraSinger 2) It is one thing if Sharron Angle believes that but her intention will be to enforce it, by legislation, on a majority who don't think like her. The sooner this woman is out of government, the better.
What a fucking sick whore. The problem with people like her is that the second her daughter got knocked up or raped, she would be all for an abortion.
P.S. Hitler was obviously God's plan.
What such dumb logic, but then again you have to throw logic out the window in order to believe in Religion.
@sclf see nothing but slander how sad nothing ot back up other than name calling ROFL.. look at this guys profile it explains it all same as his phony accoounts spiderj19 LOL see the vids its hilarious and pretty self explainitory
@evolutionmyth Both those things have peer review facts, book loads by sciencetist who spend their lifetimes studying and yours is repeated dogma from the bronze age. Give me scienctific facts to prove your god, you would be the first.
@sclf "Both those things have peer review facts, book loads by sciencetist who spend their lifetimes studying..."
Sorry, but that is only how it is supposed to work, what happens in the real world is very different. Basically, they have to go along with evolution to keep their jobs. There are many other reasons why most "scientists" go along with evolution, I will make a video about this one day to explain. In the mean time, check out these two videos: watch?v=BqUiY2gaoJY watch?v=s91-ABJ49ho
@evolutionmyth Someone who i purly dogmatic is going to make video on how scientist are dogmatic, im at a lost for words on how diluted you have to be to some how rationalized your position. BTW if you do have evidence thats is directly againsted evolution youd be the first, youd have Noble Prizes out your asshole. What do you do for a livig, have you ever went to college and taken a basic Biology course? or even graduated highschool?
@evolutionmyth Put it in short you do not have enough knowledge even about the subject to discredit it or give a decent opinion about it, you only know what comes from Ben Steins movie and what you see on creationist websites. You havent done any research to disprove it or have any evidence thats isnt taken out of contents. Lemme guess while im at it, you belive in the NWO and other conspiracy shit right? I guess its wat happens when you sit around on ur ass and at the last miutes wants
@sclf to fee smart or speacal. I have done research in my field computer engineering and i am starting on my master thesis, its nice to talk to peope like you
so i can laugh on how your tearing down the society people like me try and build with your ignorance. Go back to watching Glen Beck in your bubble, your nothing new.
@evolutionmyth Aaaaand what do you have to keep, to keep being retarded. It is literally only the mentally challenged that believe in intelligent design, you know.
@evolutionmyth Both those videos are BS. 97% of all scientists belive in Evelution, it's not n oponion you can hide if you don't belive it. The man in the first video is either not real or in the unlikly event he is, is the only biologist he knows that dosn't belive it. Evelution, like Gravity and the Sun, has bine proven so meany time dinying it is in meany countries in Europe n Canada is a legal mental ilness. If someone sais "There is not Sun" He's just as stupid as someone deniying evelution
@dave19941000 "... 97% of all scientists belive in Evelution,..."
This video clearly says otherwise: watch?v=BqUiY2gaoJY
"it's not n oponion you can hide if you don't belive it."
They do hide from it. This video: watch?v=BqUiY2gaoJY clearly shows that many scientists don't believe in evolution but are forced to go along with evolution as they would be out of a job if they didn't.
You may find the following videos interesting: watch?v=G1RUhkgqjug watch?v=oF3JFCJQASg watch?v=lI6iHDRAVSQ
@evolutionmyth - "sufficient evidence exists in support of evolution to convince 99.85% of America's earth and life scientists that the theory is valid. Evolution is the key unifying theory that unifies many different branches of science, from cosmology to biology."
One of the most fundamental assumptions held by conservative Protestants is that the Bible was inspired by God and thus is without error, as originally written.
@LoraSinger 2) Since the book of Genesis clearly describes that God created the universe, then it must be true. Answers-in-Genesis writes: ""By definition, no apparent, perceived, or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record."
In other words, those who believe in creationism over evolution are not thinking - they are blindly following a belief and nothing more.
@evolutionmyth Yes, I looked at your video. George Caylor hangs around with the Tea Party movement which should tell you something. He is interviewing "Jim" , a supposed "scientist" who remains anonymous which is not impressive. And finally we have the "heavily attested to" Lynchburg ledger which has handily disappeared. What a load of horse manure.
@dave19941000 "Evelution, like Gravity and the Sun, has bine proven so meany time ..."
"... dinying it is in meany countries in Europe n Canada is a legal mental ilness. If someone sais "There is not Sun" He's just as stupid as someone deniying evelution"
Gravity and the Sun have been observed, evolution has not. We have all seen the sun, no one has ever seen evolution, nor is there any evidence that it occurred in the past.
Evolution is NOT simply 'a change in nature' or 'change over time'.
You must read up a bit more, evo. It's pretty obvious from that statement that you are parrotting back what you've read in Conservapedia or some such "pseudo-scientific" site and haven't got a clue what adapting and evolving really mean.
@evolutionmyth "Gravity and the Sun have been observed, evolution has not. We have all seen the sun, no one has ever seen evolution, nor is there any evidence that it occurred in the past."
Who among us living have actually seen a prophet or an angel or a messiah? You may have the argument, "It was written, and people have followed it since it was written, so it must be true."
-_-"No. The Catholic Church had so much power back in the Middle ages, they more than likely edited much of the Bible
@evolutionmyth ...And put in things and took out things they thought would be cool, like Purgatory. Oh, and you remember Stalin. He did a pretty good job fooling the Russians throughout his dictatorship about his true character.
@evolutionmyth Ummm...I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but we have, in fact, *observed* evolution at work within our own lifetime. That's how so many microbes have become antibiotic resistant. To develop to a different, adaptive state or condition is literally the definition of what it means to evolve.
@evolutionmyth -so you don't believe in God, but you do believe in evolution and man-made global warming? Is that what you're saying? lol
Evolution is going on all around us as we speak. Antibiotic-resistant micro-organisms are a result of adaptation (evolution). Global warming, whether man made or not is also going on around us - changing weather patterns resulting in melting at the polar caps, floods, tornados and hurricanes. All very evident.
Cont'd - Now when was the last time you saw God (for real), evolution myth? When is the last time you saw him doing anything about the events, like disasters, starvation ans wars that are killing people? Never? I thought so.
@LoraSinger "When is the last time you saw him doing anything about the events, like disasters, starvation ans wars that are killing people?"
These occurrences that you mention are man-made. God gave man dominion over the earth, sea, and air. If you think that God should intervene every time something bad happens; then please explain how that could work? If the world was like that, we would merely be puppets on a string. God gave man free will, as a result of that, some people will do bad things
@evolutionmyth - Deformed children are man made? If God can command a war, he can stop one. When a child is raped and murdered, I would think that any self-respecting god would intervene. How about Hurricane Katrina - man made? Stop talking nonsense.
@LoraSinger God gave man dominion over the earth, sea, and air. Man needs to take responsibility for what happens in this world, we can't just keep blaming God for everything.
@evolutionmyth - Man needs to take responsibility for what happens in this world, we can't just keep blaming God for everything.
Like this? ""We don't have to protect the environment, the Second Coming is at hand."* James Watt, Secretary of the Interior in the Reagan Admin. Responsible for National Policy regarding the Environment.
@evolutionmyth - God gave man dominion over the earth ----- take responsibility for what happens in this world"
It seems to me that most of the hard right fundamentalists aren't too concerned about that since Jesus is coming back any day, and as a result they do diddly squat to protect the environment.
@evolutionmyth - "I don't appreciate people putting labels on me. If right wing...."
If you don't want a label don't talk like you deserve one. Right wing doesn't mean you have morals or give a damn. It means your thinking comes from the dark ages of superstition and myth.
@evolutionmyth - Man SAYS God gave him dominion and he uses that as an authority to pillage and destroy the earth without a single thought about the destruction he wreaks. I personally like the native way of living WITH nature rather than willy-nilly at its expense.
@evolutionmyth Well, the bible actually does state that God creates ALL good and ALL evil (No, I'm not kidding, —Isaiah 45:7 if you haven't noticed it, the bible IS a rather long read...)
However I agree with your statement because I personally believe "good" and "evil" are just two very human extremes. Besides, regardless of our different beliefs, we agree that the best way to right a wrong is to get off your ass rather than sit round blaming everything and everyone.
@LoraSinger None of those phenomenons that you mentioned are evolution, nor do they have anything to do with evolution. Evolution is not simply 'change over time', or 'a change in nature'. The deceitful propagandists behind evolution have given the world a very vague, unscientific, and ever changing, definition of evolution. They have done this because they are desperate to convince us that evolution is true. We have all been lied to. Evolution is an anti-scientific religious philosophy.
@evolutionmyth - Yes they are evolution. In changing circumstances, a creature must adapt or die. Those who adapt pass on the characteristics that allowed them to adapt until, over a period of time, all the creatures of that group have them. That is evolution in a nutshell. And, that is the reason why we have antibiotic-resistant microorganisms today.
@LoraSinger 2) There is nothing deceitful about it. Evolution is thoroughly scientifice but it is not religious philosophy. Religion requires a supernatural being such as you have.
@evolutionmyth The deceitful propagandists behind evolution have given the world a very vague, unscientific, and ever changing, definition of evolution."
It isn't vague at all IF YOU TAKE THE TROUBLE TO UNDERSTAND IT. It is ever changing because new facts are coming in every day and conclusions change with every new bit of information unlike the fundamentalists who are content to read a 2000 year old book and say that they have absolute unchanging truth.
@evolutionmyth -Evolution is a religion, a very stupid and dangerous one at that. Don't get sucked into it. "
evo, it is religion - hard right fundamentalist Christianity - that is becoming very dangerous. A majority of Christians (80%) are mainstream and that's OK but there is that 20% who are Christo-Taliban and want to rule this country. If they ever get in, it's back to the dark ages for everyone. They scare even the mainstream Christians, let alone other religions.
if ya want more friend me i can explain stuff best i can for questions. please if your just looking for a hsouting and name calling match dont bother you wont get it from me its a waste of your time
@sundaysins671 yeah hoping people get raped will help. your sick in your head and most likely in your heart to wish rape upon someone just for wanting babies to live. SICKENING. you and your parents should be ashamed. or do you acutally say stuff like this to peoples faces or jsut over the net? lol rhetorical i know your type unfortunately:/ so many of ya
@sundaysins671 the problem is you want someone to get raped because you dont agree with her LOL get a clue. and yes seen it. and i reply to anyone who has said something ot me i just have more to say than get a life and random insults. now do you have anything to add other than she should get raped? and get a a life anythign real? or just mean ignorant ocmments?
@sundaysins671 so what is your problem? is the real question. you are sick in your head nad heart. wishing people raped because htey want a baby to live. she never said she would not mind LOL have you seen the video or just making stuff up like your type does?
@sundaysins671 another shill account. no vids no comments nada. paid shill or spiderj19, sclf account see for yourselves. ghost accounts gotta lovem lol
@sundaysins671 adoption? no cant be, jsut kill babies right? sick dont bother responding anything you have ot say other than sorry is not worth the typing and worht reading and since you are who i bet you are your not going to apologize unless its to spite me LOL then i could see one but it would be a real one.
Ms. Angle: Where's your idea of "responsible choice" for any female child who is held down & raped by a relative or any female child or woman raped by any male? Answer: It doesn't exist. So, how 'bout you let females who had no choice - who were raped - be the ones to make their own "responsible choice" about the only thing, since being forcibly raped, that they do have a choice about? P.S. Jesus said nothing on this topic because women didn't have a choice then. They do now. Thank God!
@SFGrrlWonder thats just a horrid lie. women had as much choice as htey do now. tell me women arent oppresed all over the world. PFFFT christianity teaches women are equals. GOD himself sent woemn prophets. Debra is one study study study before you open your trap. see other respones to rape part not typing all tha tagain lol i uck to bad typin gto do it again:p
@sclf your logic is so horrid. just because GOD is a him the ible has ot be seixist ROFL pathetic. women in bible are treated as equals and GOd wchose women as prophets now do yourslf a favor and be quit until you actually konw hwat your talking about. and please name calling come on just sad
@scourtle They were not treated equally aywhere niether in the middle east where christanity traced their roots, nor in europe nor here until recently, thanks to the progressives, not you.
I've studied plenty about the origins of organized religion and what their 'founding fathers' said about and did to women - all in the name of Gd, thank you very much.
Why don't you take a grammar class before typing from yours? :)
@scourtle It doesn't matter what Christiantiy claims to teach; most of the really hardcore raving Christians would force their wife/daughter/sister to keep their rape baby because the voice in their heads that they call God told them to. Then they claim it was the woman's choice. That's utterly vile and revolting.
@PiecesofEternity - Those "hardcore, raving Christians" are more of a cult than anything else and it doesn't look like they are going to fade away any time soon, If there is no resistance, it's back to the dark ages, just like the last time, when the Catholic Church, after having hunted down and killed off its opposition, including the first followers of Jesus (Ebionites), took over the world.
@SFGrrlWonder its because you live in a free christian nation you get any say! live in a none christian nation see how women are treated. maybe you should put some of that hate into study
@twilite142 "Hey evolutionmyth, there is no god."
Hey twilite142, good luck proving that. You wont be the first one who has set out to disprove God and the Bible only to discover that God is real and the Bible is His word. God is real, He created the earth and the heavens above. He loved us so much that He let us live here. He later died on the cross for our sins. We will never experience true happiness or peace of mind until we accept these facts, and I'm speaking from experience.
28 But Jesus turning to them, said: Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not over me; but weep for yourselves, and for your children. 29 For behold, the days shall come, wherein they will say: Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that have not borne, and the paps that have not given suck. 30 Then shall they begin to say to the mountains: Fall upon us; and to the hills: Cover us.
31 For if in the green wood they do these things, what shall be done in the dry
A new poll shows GOP challenger Sharron Angle heads into Election Day with the potential of pulling off the single biggest upset of the election cycle.
The Mason-Dixon Polling & Research survey shows Angle with the support of 49 percent of Nevada voters compared with 45 percent who say they back Reid. Momentum has moved in Angle’s direction as she has expanded her lead from 47-45 percent in the last poll the firm released.
BYE-BYE HARRY ... and GOOD RIDDANCE you slimy TRAITOR!
tncdel 1 year ago
Sharron Angle is just saying her opinion on abortion. Abortion should not be a form of birth control. I'm sorry but most of the time you could have said yes or no and innocent life shouldn't have to be killed just because you decided to not practice safe sex. She is a little extreme on views of rape and incest but that's her views of abortion. She will benefit NV. I'm a Nevadan and Harry Reid has done absolutely nothing to benefit NV.
dj4452 1 year ago
It's a shame her parents didn't decide to have one.
jwill5587 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jwill5587, no, it's a shame your own mother didn't.
tncdel 1 year ago
Thank you, progressives!
Many of us did not know about Angle until progressives (Marxists) began demonizing her with the frenzy of wild dogs! That piqued our interest.
When we considered what she’s REALLY saying and WHY she’s saying it, we couldn't agree with her more. And we admire her courage to tell the truth!
Informed Americans understand that, if progressives demonize someone, that someone is likely to be good for the country.
Angle is great for Nevada and the U.S.!
Antonio33s 1 year ago 2
@Antonio33s yes....oh wait she lost. HA!
mrwarped 1 year ago
@Antonio33s Would be nice if the bitch could actually speak instead of running from the media. Did you hear the machine gun comment? Did you hear the one about the constitution? She thinks her imaginary god should run the country.
feldman30012 1 year ago
so if a mentally ill man who lets say had aids and crabs AND BED BUGS! for being homeless raped her then she would keep that child and love it and cherish it cause that was gods gift? CALLING ALL MENTALLY ILL MEN FREE COUCHIE AT SHARON ANGLES HOUSE
elmajfudd 1 year ago
So... her god has a divine hand in rape? e_e
satanicwatermelon 1 year ago
This election is not one to lose sight of PRAGMATIC concerns. Democrats serving FOREIGN NATIONALS HERE ILLEGALLY certainly don't have the best interests of our own country at heart. So how could we realistically expect them to vote for the candidate that would do the least harm? Reid's agenda would be greatly harmful to our country's economy. Giving illegals amnesty and everything else, as he's trying to do, would only encourage a lot more job-stealing illegals to come here to pillage us.
tncdel 1 year ago
The taking of human life is morally wrong, except in cases to save the life of the mother, when it comes to human life before birth. Or in cases of self-defense or in defense of loved ones. Other than that, the taking of human life is morally unjustifiable. And in most cases, unborn babies are killed for not much more reason than because a selfish poor excuse for a human female didn't want her social life cramped by having to hire a babysitter. Angle is right to oppose taking human life.
tncdel 1 year ago
Life in the womb is sacred, life inside gets God's okay, once out here it's a little sketchy. According to Catholic teaching, aborting a baby to save the mother is NOT okay. For ectopic pregnancy the woman may have surgery removing the tube, the death of the baby which would have died anyway is indirect. She is not allowed to take an abortifacient to kill the baby and save the mother. Wonder how Angle will feel in 20 years when the Catholic Latino population surges and is the majority.
kimzeynkink 1 year ago
@kimzeynkink, you're LYING. The Catholic church doesn't say that. Only in cases to save the life of the mother do they allow the baby's life to be forfeited.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel KNOW your catechism. Abortion is always wrong! Removing a uterus that is cancerous but contains a fetus is okay because the point is not to kill the baby but to save the mother. Ectopic pregnancy I already explained. You cannot kill the baby to save the mother without committing a mortal sin. The intent must never be to kill the baby. You are ignorant of Catholic teaching. Look up St Gianna, she was made a saint for dying rather than aborting her baby. Check out Catholic answers 4 truth!
kimzeynkink 1 year ago
@kimzeynkink, that was recognition for doing something so noble, made even more so because it was not required of her by her religion. That is also the only moral situation where a mother has the right to "choice."
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel To purposefully kill a baby is mortal sin always! If the baby dies as a by-product of a life-saving procedure as in removing a uterus or fallopian tube, that is not a sin even if the baby dies. But to leave the body intact and only kill the baby, that is abortion and it is a mortal sin. Do you see the difference here? A baby can die indirectly from action to save the mother, but to merely kill the baby because some doctor says the pregnancy is high risk is a mortal sin.
kimzeynkink 1 year ago
@kimzeynkink, any baby removed to save the life of a mother that dies is acceptable by the Catholic church as being no sin. If the baby is later than about 4 1/2 months after conception, it has a chance to survive, even if kept alive by assistance. Many adults would do if they had no access to life-sustaining technology.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel NOPE! Not if you remove it by abortive means ! Not if you intend to kill the baby. You may deliver a baby early to save the life of the mother, and if the child dies, that isn't abortion, but if you tear it to pieces to do so or if you scramble its brains that is not acceptable. Abortion is never acceptable. Go back and study the faith especially the pro-life teachings because you are erring.
kimzeynkink 1 year ago
@kimzeynkink, I'm talking about the baby dying if removed too early.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel Well, you kept using the word "abortion" which the Catholic church never allows.
kimzeynkink 1 year ago
@kimzeynkink, I said it is acceptable to take the life of the unborn baby in order to save the life of the mother. If you want to call that abortion, or simply loss of life in the process of saving life, that is a semantical technicality irrelevant to what is actually the situation. All I know is that the Catholic church allows it.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel Not a semantical technicality. Catholic church never allows the INTENTIONAL sacrifice or killing of a baby. Nope! If the baby dies as an UNINTENDED consequence that is sad but not a sin. You brush it off on semantics, while the Church is very specific. I think you don't like being mistaken and rather than admitting the true teaching of the Catholic Church, you play with semantics. If that is not the case then you are willfully ignorant of Catholic teaching. EOM 4 ever
kimzeynkink 1 year ago
@kimzeynkink,
1.) I disagree with you about what the Catholic church allows. Unless you speak with someone at the U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops and get a definitive answer, I will not concede simply on your say-so that they don't allow abortion to save the life of the mother, as I said.
2.) I really don't give a flyin' fig what the Catholic church says, since I already disagree with them that birth control isn't permissible. For there is nothing morally wrong with preventing conception.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel Thought you might be interested that the only type of birth control allowed in the Catholic faith in abstinence aka sexual continence. Even if the mother's life is in danger were she to conceive, it would be a mortal sin to contracept. If her husband really loves her he will abstain from sex, masturbation and a non-conjugal sex with the wife and adultery as are all mortal sins. I love the Catholic faith and study it endlessly.
kimzeynkink 1 year ago
@kimzeynkink, no, I'm not going for it. Phone the U.S. Council of Bishops, then ask them for clarification. They will tell you that if it's necessary to save the life of the mother, THAT'S the only exception. The only exception the Catholic church accepts is to kill IN SELF-DEFENSE. That's allowed.
P.S.
I went through 12 grades of Catholic schools and almost became clergy, so I'm well-versed in Catholic teachings. I'm not into mysticism now.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel the clarification will be that you cannot intend to kill the baby! You cannot have an abortion! You may remove a part of the mother's body that contains the problem and the by-product is the death of the fetus, but you cannot merely kill the fetus. Example given is to remove the fallopian tube in ectopic pregnancy is okay but to leave the tube and to use an abortifacient is a mortal sin. The act to save the mother must not be a direct killing of the baby! Direct abortion always wrong!
kimzeynkink 1 year ago
I bet tncdel is one of those idiots who thought Terry Shiavo should have been kept alive, and that people don't have a right to die...
RavenMichaels 1 year ago
Another proof the law is wrong is that, not only is it deemed murder if a woman kills her baby two days after being born artificially by Caesarean just 5 months after conception, but also if someone assaults a pregnant woman causing her to lose the baby, in many states the assailant can be charged with MURDER.
Now how is the state going to recognize it as murder, as it is, but not if the woman does it herself? That's crazy! Screwball Roe v. Wade threw the law out of balance.
tncdel 1 year ago
Pro-abortionists are screwballs trying to rationalize that which cannot be justified by ethics. The scales of justice must be weighed. Only in the case of when it's necessary to save the life of the mother is it ethically permissible to take the life of the child.
I read a report of a mother who adamantly refused to allow doctors to kill her baby in order to save her own life. The maternal instinct to protect her young at all cost was so strong that she sacrificed her own life to save her baby
tncdel 1 year ago
Approximately 4 million American babies are born every year. If the AAFP data* is accurate and spontaneous abortion really affects up to 20% of recognized pregnancies, then we can do the math and conclude that--following Angle's logic about God having a plan for each one of us--God kills up to 1 million American "unborns" every year.
Such a nice fellow, this God guy.
*(Management of Spontaneous Abortion, CRAIG P. GRIEBEL, M.D. et al, Am Fam Physician.2005 Oct1;72(7):1243-1250.)
Mbalakala 1 year ago
@Mbalakala, fuck that religious nonsense. I'm not into mysticism, yet I deem human life sacred. And no one has the right to "play God" taking another's life. Pro-abortionists resort to lying and subterfuge to rationalize brutally murdering innocent unborn babies. They use "choice" as a euphemism for murder, similar to how the Nazis called it "cleansing." Same thing, different holocaust.
And it's not about a woman's "choice" as to what to do with her own body. It's THE BABY'S BODY.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel so a spontaneous abortion is a "brutal murder of an innocent baby" performed by nature?
You say they use connotational euphemisms in order to mislead, but you use the words "brutal murder of an innocent baby". You assume that the procedure is brutal, that it is murder, that the embryo is a baby... and that if it were guilty of something then there wouldnt be a problem? (otherwise it wouldnt make sense to use the word "innocent")
Maybe we should tone down the rethoric a little bit?
Mbalakala 1 year ago
@Mbalakala, I'm not into playing word games. If you want to call a MISCARRIAGE a "spontaneous abortion," you can do so, but it's inaccurate. An abortion is artificially contrived murder. Of course it's brutal. A doctor violating his/ her Hippocratic oath [to do no harm] rips the baby's arms and legs off, before crushing the skull then suctioning away the grisly dismembered corpse. How much more barbarically brutal can it get?
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel "Spontaneous abortion" is a commonly used term among the scientific community, so is miscarriage. A quick pubmed search returns 15.455 results.
I'm looking at a human embryo right now and I don't see arms or a head. Are you talking about late-term abortion? I agree that the law must draw the line at some point of development. Several criteria have been proposed. I don't have an opinion about the line drawing.
However, you seemed to think it's murder from conception. Is that the case?
Mbalakala 1 year ago
@Mbalakala, no, in order to respect human life, we must follow the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution. Otherwise you violate the 5th Amendment Due Pricees clause by being arbitrary. Such as arbitrarily "playing God" with an artificially imposed time where, voila, respect for human life "magically" happens. That's BS. Each and every one of us began at the moment of conception. If you say at 5 months it's a human life, that's ridiculous. Why not 4 months and 3 weeks, and so on ...?
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel Calm down, I was just asking you a question. You could have just responded, "yes, I think abortion is murder from conception". However, as I told you, I don't see arms or a head in the embryo I was looking at earlier.
You see, some people don't think an 12-cell embryo (some of which would serve to form a placenta later on) meets the requirements for personhood, according to their criteria. Now you should make your case for the personhood from conception.
Mbalakala 1 year ago
@Mbalakala, within 24 hours of conception by then it has already formed over a million cells. It went beyond 12 cells within an hour after fertilization. You can stick that "personhood" BS where the Sun don't shine, where it belongs. I'm not going there. It's human life, with its own unique DNA different than the mother's from the moment of conception. Life develops from conception to adulthood. Even a teenager at puberty is still developing. And some teenagers aren't really "viable" either. :)~
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel no need to be to belligerent :)
ehm, maybe you should check your facts there? Until the stage of 16 cell morula is reached, every division last about 20 hours. The morula stage is reached about 70 hours post conception.
I understand that you see DNA as all you need to be considered a human being. That's fine, although in my opinion a human person is more than that. Anyway, following your standard, are you concerned about 1 million babies dead by spontaneous abortion every year?
Mbalakala 1 year ago
@Mbalakala, I'm not going for that definition you're trying to use. That's "playing God," by arbitrarily assigning a specific time when you will recognize that it is HUMAN LIFE, no matter what, from conception. You also try using the most extreme examples, to grease your sleazy arguments, when in fact very few abortions are perpetrated before 6 to 8 weeks, and some as late as over 8 months after conception. A woman doesn't even know she's pregnant when it's as early as you said.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel you're saying it's a brutal murder of a baby from day 1 and I am the extreme one?
I was just trying to understand your argument for "it's murder from conception". I'm not trying to convince you. You are entitled to your own opinions. It's ok. Really.
Though I don't really think you're interested in someone else's opinion, I'd say that having a particular genome isn't enough to me, because our genome does not define who we are as persons. Classic example, identical twins.
Mbalakala 1 year ago
@Mbalakala, I've already made it clear I won't argue this on your terms. You keep trying to sucker me in with a definition. Trying "baby" and "persons" definitions. But such definitions are JUDGMENTAL, assigned arbitrarily. What you call human life at a certain point in its development will differ from someone else's opinion. I'm not into semantic word games that frame an artificial argument, as you're trying to pull. The terminology I use keeps it indisputable. Namely: HUMAN LIFE.
tncdel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tncdel "Trying "baby" and "persons" definitions.
Excuse me, weren't you the one that used to say "it's a brutal murder of an innocent baby"? I don't consider a morula as a baby at all, I tought that was clear enough from my comments...
In fact, I've been using widely accepted terms among the scientific community all along, like "embryo", "morula", "spontaneous abortion"... while you have been using words like "murder" and "baby". Will you deny that?
Mbalakala 1 year ago
@Mbalakala, keeping the issue simple avoids losing focus by getting sidetracked on word games. And that also prevents you from winning the argument. For there is no way you can refute the fact that it is HUMAN LIFE. For it is definitely alive, and growing by leaps and bounds. And it certainly was of HUMAN parentage, not dogs or cats or any other species. Again, I assert that anyone who lacks respect for human life, whatever the stage of its development, has a character flaw. Something lacking.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel so shouldn't you be concerned about 1 million american human lives lost every year by spontaneous abortion? Shouldn't that count as a natural catastrophe or something? In the San Francisco earthquake only about 3,000 people died and yet it's considered as pretty bad body count. Think about it. 1,000,000 dead every year.
Source: Management of Spontaneous Abortion. CRAIG P. GRIEBEL, M.D. et al. Am Fam Physician. 2005 Oct 1;72(7):1243-1250.
Mbalakala 1 year ago
@Mbalakala, perhaps you're morbidly fascinated with such things as naturally-occurring pre-natal deaths. But I think you should stay focused on the actual point I made "way back when." Namely: that Angle, although not a perfect candidate, is still not as bad as Reid. As I pointed out earlier, those who quibble about what they call her "extremist" views, those things stand no chance at becoming reality. Whereas, what Reid's trying to slip past voters [amnesty and the Dream Act] could very well be
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel I was not talking to you when I posted my first comment here. *You* addressed *me*.
Anyway, it's ok. I don't have anything to say about politics so I guess this is the end for me. Cheers!
Mbalakala 1 year ago
EXACTLY!
underesteemed 1 year ago
@Mbalakala, I think anyone who doesn't have profound respect for human life at all stages has a character flaw.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel LOL. This guys delusional. Its nothing like Nazis. Last time I checked, the people the Nazis killed were actually cognizant, and didn't rely on someones umbilical cord to breathe. So good ahead and put that Nazi "argument" to bed, and come back with a real one...
RavenMichaels 1 year ago
@RavenMichaels, "cognizant?" Even before birth a baby is "cognizant." But that isn't the sole criteria. Hell, I'm sure the Nazis experimented by sedating their victims too. Does that make it any less murder because Nazis sedated someone before killing them? No. It's even murder to kill someone in a coma not brain dead. Put your pro-abortion BS to bed. The Nazi holocaust is quite "awake."
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel Theirs a major difference between a Jew in a Concentration Camp, and something that isn't even self-aware and has to rely on an umbilical cord to breathe.
Oh, and the Nazis never sedated anyone...
RavenMichaels 1 year ago
This is seriously scary. God has a plan involving women getting raped by their family members? So it makes it okay? Thats some serial killer thinking right there. Its the kind of logic someone like Timothy McVeigh would use...
RavenMichaels 1 year ago
@RavenMichaels, fail. Less than one half of one percent of abortions are done for rape. The overwhelming majority of abortions are done for not much more reason than because a heartless poor excuse for a female parent didn't want her social life cramped by having to hire a babysitter. But even in a case of rape, two wrongs don't make a right. And it is an even greater wrong to kill an innocent unborn baby.
Only to save the life of the mother is it ethical to kill the baby. No other reason.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel Fail? Uh, no. Maybe you should process it some more. It doesn't matter if its half a percent (even though I'm sure you pulled that number from nothing) of the amount of abortions. She STILL thinks that half a percent is should be forced to have the baby, and that God has a plan for it...
RavenMichaels 1 year ago
@RavenMichaels, why is it I'm not even into mysticism, and deem all religion as utter nonsense, yet I respect human life and you don't? You think it's okay to "play God." Well, I don't. You're selfish, like females who want to kill their babies before birth.
tncdel 1 year ago
@tncdel @tncdel Until that baby is born, its part of the woman, and they have a choice. However, I'd never fully respect someone who would wait till like, the last few months to do it. But early on, no, that "LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION" nonsense is ridiculous. Its like you guys have written a bad screenplay, and you have to write around the plot holes. Stop using that hacky argument...
RavenMichaels 1 year ago
@RavenMichaels, that was one of the dumbest statements I've ever read here on youtube: "Until that baby is born, its part of the woman." Ignorance is a motherfucker, isn't it? It's a shame you never took a basic high school level course in Biology. It would have saved you from embarrassing yourself like that. :(
tncdel 1 year ago
i really dont like sharron angle and i believe she will lose I believe that god will make it right by eliminating her
aimee4659 1 year ago
@tweethang1 I am at a loss with respect to understanding anything you say. You jump from one issue to another without any reasonable connection. Christians, Soldiers, Iraq, Bodies.... Jesus Christ!
I am finished with this faux-conversation.
koatzz 1 year ago
@tweethang1 What does our soldiers - who are withdrawing from Iraq - have to do with Angle's abortion position? And, as I said before, I am not a Christian, not that there is anything wrong with being one.
You really have a fascination with the Salem Witch Trials. Have you seen a doctor about your obsession?
koatzz 1 year ago
@tweethang1 Normally, I don't respond to cunts who don't know the difference between YOUR and you are. However, I felt compelled to correct one of your erroneous assumptions, which is, that I am a Christian. I am not. Regardless, let me assert my firm belief that a child conceived outside the bounds of a blessed holy-union should not be automatically murdered because of it.
koatzz 1 year ago
Republican Sharron Angle. American Taliban.
RobynHarris 1 year ago 2
she basically said we need to have faith in rape and incest.
hmmm... who should i vote for...
mrpigg000 1 year ago
Sharron Angle: "God has a plan and a purpose for each one of our lives"
This is His plan, from the American Academy of Family Physicians website:
"Spontaneous abortion, which is the loss of a pregnancy without outside intervention before 20 weeks’ gestation, affects up to 20 percent of recognized pregnancies."
God, the biggest abortionist ever. I guess.
Mbalakala 1 year ago
@Mbalakala Why even be sarcastic, man. You know these idiots will just say "OH ITS ALL PART OF GODS PLAN HE WORKS IN MYSTERIOUS WAYS!!1!".
RavenMichaels 1 year ago
"Im white. Male. age 27 and Im into witchcraft and the dark arts. I do tarot readings in my spare time and I also use a ouija board and I dabble in some other stuff."
I think your self-description says enough about your intelligence. Anyone who practices witchcraft is a faggot, needless to say. lol!
koatzz 1 year ago
Wake up people - work hard and do the best you can. Try not to judge.
Sharon Angle should represent Nevada!
Cathleeng007 1 year ago
She tries to sound profound, when in fact, she is an imbecile. She contradicts everything she says, especially now because she is desperate for votes; her future loss is inevitable and she knows it.
Orchids131 1 year ago 2
On this, I am with Angle. It is assumed that she is saying that God wants the baby to be born. This is not necessarily the case, as God could easily cause the woman to miscarriage the baby. Besides, is it the child's fault that s/he was conceived under less than ideal circumstances? Then, why hold it responsible by murdering it?
koatzz 1 year ago
@koatzz "Besides, is it the child's fault that s/he was conceived under less than ideal circumstances? Then, why hold it responsible by murdering it?"
Fundamentalist Christians also believe that if a child dies while it is below the age of accountability (13), it goes straight on to heaven - no having to live a life wherein it might sin and thus go to hell. Angle's lot want to be free of government intervention but don't mind intervening when it's something they believe in.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger The issue is whethr abortion is the natural death of the unborn, or sanitized murder? To many it is premeditated murder. And, although I agree w/your analysis of Christian doctrine w/respect 2 pre-teen death, it doesn't address the issue of whether a person has the right 2 murder the unborn. In the majority of cases, govrnmnt subsidizes the cost of abortion. The removal of government's stealthy endorsemnt of abortion via subsidies is, above all else, the crux of Angle's descent.
koatzz 1 year ago
@koatzz - Of course abortion is not natural death but the case becomes fuzzy where there is the POTENTIAL for life but at the stage it is terminated, it is a clump of a few hundred cells. I would certainly not agree with abortion in the latter stages of gestation. There is also the question of how far one group can go to impose their beliefs on others who do not share them. Those who have abortions are certainly not a danger to the general community.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger - The procedure should be in place like any other for those that need it. Those that don't agree with it are not pressured into having one certainly. As far as government subsidization, you must remember that these people are also tax payers and I'm sure that there are public services in place which you enjoy for which their tax dollars go.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger 3) I find it interesting that the very people who decry what they call excessive government intervention in people's personal affairs are the same people who are pressuring to do exactly the same thing themselves.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
Keep up the good work Sharron Angle for NV Senate - YOU CAN DO IT SHARRON! Way to speak out and AMEN and abortion is murder.
Cathleeng007 1 year ago
Keep up the good work Sharron Angle for NV Senate - YOU CAN DO IT SHARRON!
Cathleeng007 1 year ago
Making Sharon Angle mainstream; FAIL
stackamillion 1 year ago
Sharron Obtuse Angle = DINGBAT 2.0
HowAbout1000 1 year ago
Wow, the crazies are coming out of the wood work. They are organizing--TaliBagger Party.
HowAbout1000 1 year ago
That's odd, they seem to think aborting Mexicans is acceptable...
JonasPlanck 1 year ago
It doesn't make any sense. Why woudn't you abort in the case of the mother's mortality? There will be either two cases:
1) both the mother and the child will die, thus making the argument against abortion (i.e. saving the life of the baby) moot, or
2) The mother will die, but the child can somehow be saved. Yeah, I'm sure that baby will have a great time growing up without his/her genetic mother there in his/her life.
Oh, wait, I forgot, it's probably God's plan that this would happen.
Harmasias 1 year ago
DONE... Kieth Center Right, Storm, coming 4 u...hahahahahahahahah
bottjr2 1 year ago
Abortion is murder but state-funded abortion is genocide.
AcePilot101 1 year ago
God forbid that anyone want children in this world to live life and have a chance like the rest of us. What if Keith's mom told him he was almost aborted? Then all you liberals wouldnt have your snide, trash talking idol to watch every night. Angle's reason for believing abortion should be illegal is honest and heartfelt. Does that mean she is going to write up a bill to make it illegal? NO! People should stick to the POLITICAL issues not social.
MrGOPERA 1 year ago
@MrGOPERA, you are right. All these ridiculous attacks against Sharron Angle just demonstrate how desperate progressives are to defeat Sharron Angle.
The more progressives demonize someone, however, the more that person will be able to help us defend ourselves -- and our children and grandchildren -- from Obama, Reid and Pelosi and their job-killing, economy-killing, freedom-killing scams like Obamacare and cap and trade.
We'll vote for Angle!
Antonio33s 1 year ago
@Antonio33s Voter all you want but Sharon is gone after the election thank god
Fringe111 1 year ago 7
@Antonio33s she is already defeated, you must related to her for all this cheap advertising you do for her. If she wasn't CHEAP, she would pay for real advertising, not your stupid shit.
Angle can't save us from anyone or anything. The GOP lost girly boy and it's time you woke up and smelt the roses.
We Will All Vote for Harry Reid, the man who helped make Affordable Care Act, so we will be protected from insurance
BritmanForever 1 year ago
nutty bitch is goin' down
greeniem 1 year ago
Out of more than 600 laws of Moses, none comments on abortion. One Mosaic law about miscarriage specifically contradicts the claim that the bible is antiabortion, clearly stating that miscarriage does not involve the death of a human being. If a woman has a miscarriage as the result of a fight, the man who caused it should be fined. If the woman dies, however, the culprit must be killed:
LoraSinger 1 year ago 2
@LoraSinger 2) It is one thing if Sharron Angle believes that but her intention will be to enforce it, by legislation, on a majority who don't think like her. The sooner this woman is out of government, the better.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
You fuckers who appear to be right are reallyfuckheads! Sharron Angle is a real whore!
padude64 1 year ago
I hope this woman's daughter or sister is raped by a close family member and gets pregnant. Let's see how her idiocy holds up then.
PiecesofEternity 1 year ago
Olby is such a loser & his network is failing fast despite big liberal money propping it up....
mrbleedo 1 year ago
What a fucking sick whore. The problem with people like her is that the second her daughter got knocked up or raped, she would be all for an abortion.
P.S. Hitler was obviously God's plan.
What such dumb logic, but then again you have to throw logic out the window in order to believe in Religion.
dfrutled 1 year ago
what do people do who have no arguement? name call and show nothing ot back it up LOL
scourtle 1 year ago 2
Did someone invite god boys, gobal warming deniers and evolution deniers to this video forum?
sclf 1 year ago
@sclf see nothing but slander how sad nothing ot back up other than name calling ROFL.. look at this guys profile it explains it all same as his phony accoounts spiderj19 LOL see the vids its hilarious and pretty self explainitory
scourtle 1 year ago
@sclf lol, so you don't believe in God, but you do believe in evolution and man-made global warming? Is that what you're saying? lol
evolutionmyth 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth Both those things have peer review facts, book loads by sciencetist who spend their lifetimes studying and yours is repeated dogma from the bronze age. Give me scienctific facts to prove your god, you would be the first.
sclf 1 year ago
@sclf "Both those things have peer review facts, book loads by sciencetist who spend their lifetimes studying..."
Sorry, but that is only how it is supposed to work, what happens in the real world is very different. Basically, they have to go along with evolution to keep their jobs. There are many other reasons why most "scientists" go along with evolution, I will make a video about this one day to explain. In the mean time, check out these two videos: watch?v=BqUiY2gaoJY watch?v=s91-ABJ49ho
evolutionmyth 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth Someone who i purly dogmatic is going to make video on how scientist are dogmatic, im at a lost for words on how diluted you have to be to some how rationalized your position. BTW if you do have evidence thats is directly againsted evolution youd be the first, youd have Noble Prizes out your asshole. What do you do for a livig, have you ever went to college and taken a basic Biology course? or even graduated highschool?
sclf 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth Put it in short you do not have enough knowledge even about the subject to discredit it or give a decent opinion about it, you only know what comes from Ben Steins movie and what you see on creationist websites. You havent done any research to disprove it or have any evidence thats isnt taken out of contents. Lemme guess while im at it, you belive in the NWO and other conspiracy shit right? I guess its wat happens when you sit around on ur ass and at the last miutes wants
sclf 1 year ago
@sclf to fee smart or speacal. I have done research in my field computer engineering and i am starting on my master thesis, its nice to talk to peope like you
so i can laugh on how your tearing down the society people like me try and build with your ignorance. Go back to watching Glen Beck in your bubble, your nothing new.
sclf 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth Aaaaand what do you have to keep, to keep being retarded. It is literally only the mentally challenged that believe in intelligent design, you know.
PiecesofEternity 1 year ago
@PiecesofEternity
watch?v=BqUiY2gaoJY
watch?v=G1RUhkgqjug
watch?v=b5PKukgkEbU
watch?v=oF3JFCJQASg
watch?v=DQeBR_U6oKk
watch?v=i8heykuYDp4
watch?v=glCyguENIzs
watch?v=YHVmI8iDLqw
evolutionmyth 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth Both those videos are BS. 97% of all scientists belive in Evelution, it's not n oponion you can hide if you don't belive it. The man in the first video is either not real or in the unlikly event he is, is the only biologist he knows that dosn't belive it. Evelution, like Gravity and the Sun, has bine proven so meany time dinying it is in meany countries in Europe n Canada is a legal mental ilness. If someone sais "There is not Sun" He's just as stupid as someone deniying evelution
dave19941000 1 year ago
@dave19941000 "... 97% of all scientists belive in Evelution,..."
This video clearly says otherwise: watch?v=BqUiY2gaoJY
"it's not n oponion you can hide if you don't belive it."
They do hide from it. This video: watch?v=BqUiY2gaoJY clearly shows that many scientists don't believe in evolution but are forced to go along with evolution as they would be out of a job if they didn't.
You may find the following videos interesting: watch?v=G1RUhkgqjug watch?v=oF3JFCJQASg watch?v=lI6iHDRAVSQ
evolutionmyth 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth - "sufficient evidence exists in support of evolution to convince 99.85% of America's earth and life scientists that the theory is valid. Evolution is the key unifying theory that unifies many different branches of science, from cosmology to biology."
One of the most fundamental assumptions held by conservative Protestants is that the Bible was inspired by God and thus is without error, as originally written.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger 2) Since the book of Genesis clearly describes that God created the universe, then it must be true. Answers-in-Genesis writes: ""By definition, no apparent, perceived, or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record."
In other words, those who believe in creationism over evolution are not thinking - they are blindly following a belief and nothing more.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth Yes, I looked at your video. George Caylor hangs around with the Tea Party movement which should tell you something. He is interviewing "Jim" , a supposed "scientist" who remains anonymous which is not impressive. And finally we have the "heavily attested to" Lynchburg ledger which has handily disappeared. What a load of horse manure.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@dave19941000 "Evelution, like Gravity and the Sun, has bine proven so meany time ..."
"... dinying it is in meany countries in Europe n Canada is a legal mental ilness. If someone sais "There is not Sun" He's just as stupid as someone deniying evelution"
Gravity and the Sun have been observed, evolution has not. We have all seen the sun, no one has ever seen evolution, nor is there any evidence that it occurred in the past.
Evolution is NOT simply 'a change in nature' or 'change over time'.
evolutionmyth 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth - No one has ever seen evolution"
You must read up a bit more, evo. It's pretty obvious from that statement that you are parrotting back what you've read in Conservapedia or some such "pseudo-scientific" site and haven't got a clue what adapting and evolving really mean.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth "Gravity and the Sun have been observed, evolution has not. We have all seen the sun, no one has ever seen evolution, nor is there any evidence that it occurred in the past."
Who among us living have actually seen a prophet or an angel or a messiah? You may have the argument, "It was written, and people have followed it since it was written, so it must be true."
-_-"No. The Catholic Church had so much power back in the Middle ages, they more than likely edited much of the Bible
Harmasias 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth ...And put in things and took out things they thought would be cool, like Purgatory. Oh, and you remember Stalin. He did a pretty good job fooling the Russians throughout his dictatorship about his true character.
Harmasias 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth Ummm...I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but we have, in fact, *observed* evolution at work within our own lifetime. That's how so many microbes have become antibiotic resistant. To develop to a different, adaptive state or condition is literally the definition of what it means to evolve.
TomVodkaCollins 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth Yup, both of which can be proven beyond 'Ooooh-woooh some unseen silent sky-wizard said so!! OOOOHWOOOOOH!!!!!!'
PiecesofEternity 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth -so you don't believe in God, but you do believe in evolution and man-made global warming? Is that what you're saying? lol
Evolution is going on all around us as we speak. Antibiotic-resistant micro-organisms are a result of adaptation (evolution). Global warming, whether man made or not is also going on around us - changing weather patterns resulting in melting at the polar caps, floods, tornados and hurricanes. All very evident.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger 2) That was for evolution myth.
Cont'd - Now when was the last time you saw God (for real), evolution myth? When is the last time you saw him doing anything about the events, like disasters, starvation ans wars that are killing people? Never? I thought so.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger "When is the last time you saw him doing anything about the events, like disasters, starvation ans wars that are killing people?"
These occurrences that you mention are man-made. God gave man dominion over the earth, sea, and air. If you think that God should intervene every time something bad happens; then please explain how that could work? If the world was like that, we would merely be puppets on a string. God gave man free will, as a result of that, some people will do bad things
evolutionmyth 1 year ago 2
@evolutionmyth - Deformed children are man made? If God can command a war, he can stop one. When a child is raped and murdered, I would think that any self-respecting god would intervene. How about Hurricane Katrina - man made? Stop talking nonsense.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger "That is evolution in a nutshell."
You do not know what evolution is.
evolutionmyth 1 year ago
@LoraSinger God gave man dominion over the earth, sea, and air. Man needs to take responsibility for what happens in this world, we can't just keep blaming God for everything.
evolutionmyth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@evolutionmyth - Man needs to take responsibility for what happens in this world, we can't just keep blaming God for everything.
Like this? ""We don't have to protect the environment, the Second Coming is at hand."* James Watt, Secretary of the Interior in the Reagan Admin. Responsible for National Policy regarding the Environment.
And the many others who feel the same way.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth - God gave man dominion over the earth ----- take responsibility for what happens in this world"
It seems to me that most of the hard right fundamentalists aren't too concerned about that since Jesus is coming back any day, and as a result they do diddly squat to protect the environment.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger I don't appreciate people putting labels on me. If right-wing means having morals, and giving a damn, then I guess I'm right-wing.
evolutionmyth 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth - "I don't appreciate people putting labels on me. If right wing...."
If you don't want a label don't talk like you deserve one. Right wing doesn't mean you have morals or give a damn. It means your thinking comes from the dark ages of superstition and myth.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth - Man SAYS God gave him dominion and he uses that as an authority to pillage and destroy the earth without a single thought about the destruction he wreaks. I personally like the native way of living WITH nature rather than willy-nilly at its expense.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth Well, the bible actually does state that God creates ALL good and ALL evil (No, I'm not kidding, —Isaiah 45:7 if you haven't noticed it, the bible IS a rather long read...)
However I agree with your statement because I personally believe "good" and "evil" are just two very human extremes. Besides, regardless of our different beliefs, we agree that the best way to right a wrong is to get off your ass rather than sit round blaming everything and everyone.
pamew 1 year ago
@LoraSinger None of those phenomenons that you mentioned are evolution, nor do they have anything to do with evolution. Evolution is not simply 'change over time', or 'a change in nature'. The deceitful propagandists behind evolution have given the world a very vague, unscientific, and ever changing, definition of evolution. They have done this because they are desperate to convince us that evolution is true. We have all been lied to. Evolution is an anti-scientific religious philosophy.
evolutionmyth 1 year ago 2
@evolutionmyth - Yes they are evolution. In changing circumstances, a creature must adapt or die. Those who adapt pass on the characteristics that allowed them to adapt until, over a period of time, all the creatures of that group have them. That is evolution in a nutshell. And, that is the reason why we have antibiotic-resistant microorganisms today.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger 2) There is nothing deceitful about it. Evolution is thoroughly scientifice but it is not religious philosophy. Religion requires a supernatural being such as you have.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@evolutionmyth The deceitful propagandists behind evolution have given the world a very vague, unscientific, and ever changing, definition of evolution."
It isn't vague at all IF YOU TAKE THE TROUBLE TO UNDERSTAND IT. It is ever changing because new facts are coming in every day and conclusions change with every new bit of information unlike the fundamentalists who are content to read a 2000 year old book and say that they have absolute unchanging truth.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
@LoraSinger Evolution is a religion, a very stupid and dangerous one at that. Don't get sucked into it.
evolutionmyth 1 year ago 2
@evolutionmyth -Evolution is a religion, a very stupid and dangerous one at that. Don't get sucked into it. "
evo, it is religion - hard right fundamentalist Christianity - that is becoming very dangerous. A majority of Christians (80%) are mainstream and that's OK but there is that 20% who are Christo-Taliban and want to rule this country. If they ever get in, it's back to the dark ages for everyone. They scare even the mainstream Christians, let alone other religions.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
if ya want more friend me i can explain stuff best i can for questions. please if your just looking for a hsouting and name calling match dont bother you wont get it from me its a waste of your time
scourtle 1 year ago
Comment removed
sundaysins671 1 year ago
@sundaysins671 yeah hoping people get raped will help. your sick in your head and most likely in your heart to wish rape upon someone just for wanting babies to live. SICKENING. you and your parents should be ashamed. or do you acutally say stuff like this to peoples faces or jsut over the net? lol rhetorical i know your type unfortunately:/ so many of ya
scourtle 1 year ago
Comment removed
sundaysins671 1 year ago
@sundaysins671 the problem is you want someone to get raped because you dont agree with her LOL get a clue. and yes seen it. and i reply to anyone who has said something ot me i just have more to say than get a life and random insults. now do you have anything to add other than she should get raped? and get a a life anythign real? or just mean ignorant ocmments?
scourtle 1 year ago
@sundaysins671 so what is your problem? is the real question. you are sick in your head nad heart. wishing people raped because htey want a baby to live. she never said she would not mind LOL have you seen the video or just making stuff up like your type does?
scourtle 1 year ago
Comment removed
scourtle 1 year ago
@sundaysins671 another shill account. no vids no comments nada. paid shill or spiderj19, sclf account see for yourselves. ghost accounts gotta lovem lol
scourtle 1 year ago
@sundaysins671 adoption? no cant be, jsut kill babies right? sick dont bother responding anything you have ot say other than sorry is not worth the typing and worht reading and since you are who i bet you are your not going to apologize unless its to spite me LOL then i could see one but it would be a real one.
scourtle 1 year ago
@scourtle wouldn't
scourtle 1 year ago
Ms. Angle: Where's your idea of "responsible choice" for any female child who is held down & raped by a relative or any female child or woman raped by any male? Answer: It doesn't exist. So, how 'bout you let females who had no choice - who were raped - be the ones to make their own "responsible choice" about the only thing, since being forcibly raped, that they do have a choice about? P.S. Jesus said nothing on this topic because women didn't have a choice then. They do now. Thank God!
SFGrrlWonder 1 year ago
@SFGrrlWonder thats just a horrid lie. women had as much choice as htey do now. tell me women arent oppresed all over the world. PFFFT christianity teaches women are equals. GOD himself sent woemn prophets. Debra is one study study study before you open your trap. see other respones to rape part not typing all tha tagain lol i uck to bad typin gto do it again:p
scourtle 1 year ago
@scourtle *women today oppressed all over world* tunnel visoin. see other countires than usa today.
scourtle 1 year ago
Comment removed
scourtle 1 year ago
@scourtle But god is always reffered as him, why isnt the bible sexist to begin with little tea bagger.
sclf 1 year ago
@sclf your logic is so horrid. just because GOD is a him the ible has ot be seixist ROFL pathetic. women in bible are treated as equals and GOd wchose women as prophets now do yourslf a favor and be quit until you actually konw hwat your talking about. and please name calling come on just sad
scourtle 1 year ago
@scourtle They were not treated equally aywhere niether in the middle east where christanity traced their roots, nor in europe nor here until recently, thanks to the progressives, not you.
sclf 1 year ago
@scourtle:
Wow... grumpy, aren't you?
I've studied plenty about the origins of organized religion and what their 'founding fathers' said about and did to women - all in the name of Gd, thank you very much.
Why don't you take a grammar class before typing from yours? :)
SFGrrlWonder 1 year ago
@scourtle It doesn't matter what Christiantiy claims to teach; most of the really hardcore raving Christians would force their wife/daughter/sister to keep their rape baby because the voice in their heads that they call God told them to. Then they claim it was the woman's choice. That's utterly vile and revolting.
PiecesofEternity 1 year ago
@PiecesofEternity - Those "hardcore, raving Christians" are more of a cult than anything else and it doesn't look like they are going to fade away any time soon, If there is no resistance, it's back to the dark ages, just like the last time, when the Catholic Church, after having hunted down and killed off its opposition, including the first followers of Jesus (Ebionites), took over the world.
LoraSinger 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SFGrrlWonder its because you live in a free christian nation you get any say! live in a none christian nation see how women are treated. maybe you should put some of that hate into study
scourtle 1 year ago
Comment removed
SFGrrlWonder 1 year ago
@justonemorename AFAIK "Kill" means murder in that context. As in, the unnecessary/unjustified killing of humans.
evolutionmyth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey evolutionmyth, there is no god.
twilite142 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@twilite142 "Hey evolutionmyth, there is no god."
Hey twilite142, good luck proving that. You wont be the first one who has set out to disprove God and the Bible only to discover that God is real and the Bible is His word. God is real, He created the earth and the heavens above. He loved us so much that He let us live here. He later died on the cross for our sins. We will never experience true happiness or peace of mind until we accept these facts, and I'm speaking from experience.
evolutionmyth 1 year ago 3
28 But Jesus turning to them, said: Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not over me; but weep for yourselves, and for your children. 29 For behold, the days shall come, wherein they will say: Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that have not borne, and the paps that have not given suck. 30 Then shall they begin to say to the mountains: Fall upon us; and to the hills: Cover us.
31 For if in the green wood they do these things, what shall be done in the dry
Luke CH 23 VS 28-31
SoldierofChrist12345 1 year ago 5
@SoldierofChrist12345 Bleugh, what crap, 2000 year old bullshit, of religions are based on the the Egyptians, and you still pedal it like it's yours.
If you don't have a vagina you don't have a mouth, get your own damn vagina then comment.
Angle said she wants Harry Reid Shooting, so how the hell can this stupid, venegar titted old bitch respect life?
She is a TEABAG TALIBAN TERRORIST, they want the breakup of the US.
Grey Obese Paedophiles
BritmanForever 1 year ago