Whether we like it or not complex civilization basically "orders itself" with implied threatening, sometimes with implied death threatening. It's not always "stark death threats". The other "force" is desire or need to belong" as a counter to "life threatening as normal". It's all very crazy. You can talk about a "death threat bias field" like it's normal. All this stuff destroys life and good will. Bad analytical habits come from these two things.
i know, it's hard to actually talk about when talking too much will get you in trouble. As we all know; part of human nature is to kill for non compliance or sometimes just as the result of "status fun". People have alot to deal with. It's the social "death threats" that tend to set personal bias. It's usally in a social context that adult imply that their children should die for non-believing. My childhood was "the worst" for that group-adult belief behavior. That's why only truth works.
To actually achieve in "a hard wired world" we have to believe and belong to a believing group. We usually like to think of this as good rather than bad. Usually status biases are status or belief bound and therefore truth divergent; leaving the believer somewhat incapable of finding truth or a cure and stuck with their ever devolving belief bound biases. Group living puts strains on mental consequent physical health. If there was a way to be well it always takes a back seat to more status.
i think it might be more of a neural net de-biasing that occurs. Not too much else would explain the actual curative phenom. We usually think of ourselves in terms of our bias or where we live on a bias. We usually think of God as we think of our status in a "bias field". This might be why we hate de-biasing, because it is like giving up status and choosing perception. The thing is health and status hardening are like opposites and status is like a mortal enemy of health.
H E M P for V I C T O R Y
onedollarwill 1 year ago
Whether we like it or not complex civilization basically "orders itself" with implied threatening, sometimes with implied death threatening. It's not always "stark death threats". The other "force" is desire or need to belong" as a counter to "life threatening as normal". It's all very crazy. You can talk about a "death threat bias field" like it's normal. All this stuff destroys life and good will. Bad analytical habits come from these two things.
hypnofan35 2 years ago
i know, it's hard to actually talk about when talking too much will get you in trouble. As we all know; part of human nature is to kill for non compliance or sometimes just as the result of "status fun". People have alot to deal with. It's the social "death threats" that tend to set personal bias. It's usally in a social context that adult imply that their children should die for non-believing. My childhood was "the worst" for that group-adult belief behavior. That's why only truth works.
hypnofan35 2 years ago
To actually achieve in "a hard wired world" we have to believe and belong to a believing group. We usually like to think of this as good rather than bad. Usually status biases are status or belief bound and therefore truth divergent; leaving the believer somewhat incapable of finding truth or a cure and stuck with their ever devolving belief bound biases. Group living puts strains on mental consequent physical health. If there was a way to be well it always takes a back seat to more status.
hypnofan35 2 years ago
i think it might be more of a neural net de-biasing that occurs. Not too much else would explain the actual curative phenom. We usually think of ourselves in terms of our bias or where we live on a bias. We usually think of God as we think of our status in a "bias field". This might be why we hate de-biasing, because it is like giving up status and choosing perception. The thing is health and status hardening are like opposites and status is like a mortal enemy of health.
hypnofan35 2 years ago