Added: 4 years ago
From: AssociatedPress
Views: 212,234
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (348)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They didn't add "junk to orbit" it was hit on reentry. That's why the hit was so amazing, because it was proof that our "missile shield" could hit a warhead in terminal phase.

  • @wtfyiseverynamtaken As I said in my comment, they say it was 139 miles up. Once it's there it costs 0$ to get it out of orbit as it will reenter by it's own pretty soon.

  • SPACE WAR!!!!!!!!

  • Why not use a space shutte to recover this satellite ? Were they really sending a signal to china, or Russia, or some other country ? Now the space shuttle missions are over , and maybe for the foreseable future. Seems a little risky to be blowing up satellites, risking contamination of space with the debris..,.

  • @SuperHoneycutt As it says in the video, that satellite was 139 miles up. No danger whatsoever as any debris will reenter the atmosphere in no time anyway. Would you pay almost a billion $ to recover a satellite?

  • This apears to be a big big bulshit propaganda! Response to the chinese...sprinkled with lies

  • please dont shoot the satelites with P0rn :)))))))))))

  • Your problem is the space debris, if you start a space war the amount of spacedebris wiill multiplie, much lika a fusion reaction. It doesnt take many days of spacewar to make the amount of debris that will make space a killing zone, impossible to enter.

    And then you have absolutely no use for space command.

  • this whole hazardous waste is just a smokescreen. they just wanna show the chinese that america can take down all their satellites any time it wishes. first you take out their satellites then you deliver a first strike on their nuclear and command centers. 

  • Didn't this thing go tits up as soon as it was launched/ deployed?

    The satellite I mean...

  • Thanks for the space debris!

  • USS lake erie??? named after a canadian lake? win

  • @MrMegaWolfeman US lake bud

  • @Hello8104 your a bumb ass, it is the border between the US and canada with canada owning the majority of it fucktard

  • @MrMegaWolfeman Prove it trololol! I don't like it when my hat can't prove stuff :(

  • @Hello8104 prove it? look at a map, it shows the border going through lake erie....

  • @MrMegaWolfeman wait a second... So it is a us lake then! I win

  • @Hello8104 you have serious issues lol

    

  • 9/11 not 11/11 your dumb

  • @Dogzforgodz whatever. its still has a fake backstory.

  • The worst bullshit since 2001/11/11....USA are unable to see the terrorists attacks on twin towers...but they have, ohhhh, best services in the world, obsolet CIA and FBI...sucks....$ power rule the world in USA....poor guys....so noobs.....

  • Congrats USA and China for shooting down your own satellites. This take engineering to the next level.

  • Ye suck on dat china, when can us normal citizens get these weapons, hit me up uncle sam

  • RIM-161's rule, at $10 million a pop so they should be!

  • Great shot but its not really new. In the 90's the F-15 was fitted with an anti-satelite missle that did the same thing but nobody cared back then. The difference is that this was launched from a ship. Oh and all those haters out there, suck on big USA dick and chocke on it.

  • The narrator sound like nerd

  • @AmericasSwede

    wtf does nerd sound like

  • This ability dictates militarism of space.

    I guess the newly (2010) secret US army launch under NASA has something to do with this missiles capabilities. First its remote cameras and communication (like civilian satellites), then counter measures and lastly the step goes to actually putting weapons on the satellites. What I think they sent up is basically a satellites with counter measures.

  • you mean Hydrazine.

  • Shows how good the Navy is

  • Federal American Government has and knows no bounds.. See my video response guy's posted above.. The one titled Stateless... Or check my site out on American injustice at; StatelessDaveTV (dot) com

  • Blowing a satellite into tiny pieces lowers its ballistic coefficient, meaning the pieces will re-enter the atmosphere sooner than if it was in one piece.

    Hydrazine is of course not an issue, as it would be dispersed high in the atmosphere as the satellite burnt up during re-entry, making it rather more likely the satellite was destroyed to prevent anyone from getting their hands on it.

  • if they hadnt hit it the tank could have survived and the hudrazine then could become airborne on the ground.

  • @boomersooner550

    There is no way it would survive re-entry. We're talking air temperatures of 1650 Celsius (3000 Fahrenheit) and up. Even a steel tank would melt, burst, and be torn apart by aerodynamic forces, scattering the hydrazine all over the upper atmosphere (and harming nobody).

  • i always wonder what else was in that satellite.

  • I am so fucking tired of these stupid ads! always at least one!

  • i thought they shot down satellites with f-15's

  • oh no not that high f15s cant go that high without engine failure and everything else along with it failing

  • no not going right next to space just so high then it fires the the missile

  • low earth orbit at minimum is 160km, and the ceiling on f-15's is like 60-70kft (22-23km or so).

  • si si tiramos el satelite le dimos ja ja ja.por favor esto no es para los gringitos es para los latinos lame botas que creen esas pendej(*# bueno que con eso america latina se sige muriendo de ambre y muchos latinos aun sigen disiendo que USA ,(*^%$ mejor ya no sigo me dan hasco

  • yeah, congratulations, but they all complained when China did the same thing.

    story about saving earth is bullshit , they just did more junk in the orbit, dangerous to other satellites

  • @dajsinjo It was a display of , hey we can shoot sown your satelite as well so there. Hydrozine would just burn up in re-entry. Its goign at 25,000 kms/h. As if its going to survive re-entry without a heat shield. If that were the case the space shuttle wouldn't blow up on re-entry. ANd it HAS a heat shield.

  • @dajsinjo I realize this is an old comment, so you might not even see my reply. Also, others may have said this.

    USA 193 was already deorbiting, which posed a risk to major population centers here on Earth. When USA 193 was destroyed, it was at an altitude low enough to guarantee reentry of debris.

  • @Uejji hydrazine would burn up for sure on very high altitude so I don't belive it could post any risk, explosion probably accelerated some debris into higher orbit

  • @dajsinjo The concern wasn't that hydrazine would burn up on reentry (of course it would, that's why it was no longer a concern after the satellite was destroyed... all debris would be safely destroyed upon reentry). The concern was that enough of the satellite would survive reentry that the hydrazine would survive the trip and be released into a population center or, worse, higher up into the atmosphere.

  • @Uejji ok, maybe but when proton rocket and others explode that is a lot of hydrazine... few grams that could possibley survive are not so big problem, maybe it would be cheaper to pay compensation if someone gets hit by the debrie than to shoot it down... it was demonstration of military power and I congratulate, it is just not right to lie to people

  • yeah we need to put these missles to use...i like phoenix032's idea!

  • great shot, now shoot  down FOX news sattelites and CNN too!!!

  • lol how about direct tv hahaha

  • @phonix032

    I prefer CNN over Fox, but that was funny. :)

  • The point is to talk about it can make the difference. Not enough long term scientific thought is put into the decisions that put us where we are. Our problem on the whole is definatly who is in power. Taking action to right the wrongs is our future.

  • YB so shrill? The issue here as i see it is that a small minority of technical people make decisions that effect all of us w/o proper discussion. i know that a lot of people don't care about the crap in space, but many of us do. Technology runs far ahead of public policy and I don't know how to or if that can be adjusted.

  • I am real, denial doesn`t help. People do self destructive things for great amounts of money and power, theres no denying that!

  • I would like to add that for anyone to even Think of not thinking about the problems that could be created by space debrie and radiation, its a sin. We have depleted our ozone to the point its almost ireversable. Older satellites carried atomic clocks and propulsion useing plutonium and that fact is not arguable . Gov. has taken huge chances, like with the cassini-huygens space probe which carries 72 lbs! used in the radioisotope thermoelectric generators. enough is enough.

  • kinda not get what you are trying to say, but remenber we humans wont stop doing something until we suffer the consequences. also remenber, the ones making all that stuff is ourselves and is us who we have to blame. "Small ideas can be great ideas..." "With huge power comes great responsability..." that is what we do not think when doing things. So, give it a rest and dont blame only the Government, after all, we all make mistakes.

  • satilites carry plutonium which when it hits the ground emplodes and creates radioactive dust. they say if there was 1 lbs of it in our atmosphere it could kill everything on earth! There are 50 lbs. orbiting earth!! why in the world would we explode one?? even just one. Please, no weapons in space, we need to de-weaponize space and clean it up as it is.

  • Yeah! you know what your talking about! :P

    1lbs killing us all....... yeah definantly!!!

  • You are wrong, please do some research.

    Not all satellites use plutonium as a heating source, mostly only probes. Plutonium does not explode when it hits the ground. 1 lbs of plutonium dust is NOT enough to kill everything on earth. It is allot of lethal doses, but you can't spread that small amount to a very wide area.

  • With all the space gear we have in space we should be cleaning it up not thinking about creating more. Not only is there the threat of neuclear dust but hydrosine gas. Our air is precious, theres no way i`m going to promote the lies our gov. places on us, or promote the space program, especially weapons in space.

  • GOVERNEMENT LIES! GOVERNMENT LIES!!! give it a rest, please? you act like they just do shit that will harm as though it won't harm them too? get real..

  • glad someone understands. though i wont be in favor nor against anyone here. we all are resonsible for everything happenning in this planet and that is what we do not notice, so we just blame the government because they are the ones using all this stuff. for money we have been making weapons and destroying the planet, and WE are all at fault.

  • Comment removed

  • well i guess this confirms missile sheild works and operational

  • i hope america rocket can go hit and destroy ussr russia military spy satellite down,,,

    ussr russia is always spy spy spy on america toooo much,,,

    why ussr russia use 2 or 3 american computers

  • weapon of mass distuction

  • Then why don't they shoot us? Hmm... maybe because they're scared of us? Also obviously it would take a long time to calculate the take down. It was the FIRST time this has ever been done and it was a hit. I'm sure if we wanted to do it again it would take much shorter since we know how to do it now.

  • Example iownallsostepoff an army of 5 could exterminate your entire family in hours.

    Claim freedom or die.

    Thats what the mighty Stalin enforced.

  • Obviously 5 people could kill me. It would be 5 on 1. Give me an 8 incher and the turn out will be much different.

  • USArCOWARDS=fail at trying to insult america.

    This faggot makes fun of americans when he himself spends about 100's of hours a week on youtube alone going on every US video and "trying" but not succeeding in bashing Americans.

    No one take him seriously, I won a argument a while back with him, and the only thing he did as yell stuff like "LMAO, LOL," and every time I proved him wrong he would simply try to find another weakness, but failed.

    he is still a amature =(.

  • Abd how long did it take USa to calculate the numbers to make the missile destroy this satellite of theres?

    4 months was it?

    LMAO

    God help you yank.

  • haha, see EXACTLY what I mean, he cant think of ANYTHING to try to insult me with so he goes for something random. "UMM GEE HOW LONG DID IT TAKE US TO CALCULATE"...

    hmm, maybe because this was not a military threat? this was not Russia launching a ICBM. US took their itme on this because we did not want the parts flying into another country. Sadly I wish they had flown right into your house and the 500,000 degree heat would have disinigrated your body.

    anything else? Ill wait..

  • DarkHour404,

    So what you writing?

    If it was a military threat USa would of shot an ICBM down faster than 4 months?

    Good for you.

    I however disagree as its USA's policy to scream at the top of their voices to the world.

    "WHHHAAA WHHHAAA any cuntry with ICMBS is aganst international law and most be destroyed before they launch them"

    The reason being because once launched they fly at over 15,000mph in any direction maybe even invisible.

    A power the USA can not stop.

    But there you go.

  • USArCOWARDS: We've already shot down ICBM's, our own test units. Not to mention we have many different ways of doing it. We just don't tell everyone about it. Shooting a satelite out of space is a completely different matter.

  • just face ir USArCOWARDS, you are a horrible debator. You have nothing to backup, and just say the most OBVSIOUY comments you can think of. I mean I can easily tell your at least? hmm, 15,16 by the way you try to debate and argue.

    Too easy..

  • Just mark cowards thumbs down and spam. He is like an STD. Never address him. Just ignore him and mark him spam. He isn't interested in anything truthful.

    His life is literally a wasteland. All he has to do is troll online. He will pick a fight with anyone over anything saying the dumbest things he can imagine.

    Give him nothing back. Mark him thumbs down and spam. Never interact with him.

  • I feel as though I've missed something, coming lately to this forum. Who is so terrible?

  • USArCOWARDS is just a douchebag troll he is looking to fight over anything & everything.

    I made the mistake of trying to reason with him some time back. He is being intentionally obtuse. It is a waste of time to discuss anything with a person like that.

  • The guy is from iran what do you expect from someone who is from a country of terorists

  • How long did it take Britian to make a system like this? OH WAIT You don't HAVE one. Even if you did get one it would be based on AMERICAN technology. Good luck trying to defend against ICBM's.

  • If you hate Britian so much than move to a Communist country like North Korea or Russia even though they are not Communist they are turning back to their fascist ways. OH wait all those places are absolute SHITHOLES and Britian has a sense of decency and has standards, unlike those poor excuses for countries.

  • nah the Only reason he says most of his BS is because he hates the "US policy" I see him always talking shit about US commiting genocide and how "corrupt" we are. When USSR has commited twice as more genocide to their own people. Also the Massacre of Ketya forrest to the 500,000 dead Polish, and the millions of dead soviets when stalin was incharge. But clearly he does not want to admit it. And only points out false ways of what US did when its not even CLOSE to others.

  • What do you expect from a guy from teroristland?When a war breaks out i will gladly watch how his sorry ass burns from radiation and he will scream AMERICA HELP US!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • I rather think it is time for us to do that for a bit. Stand aside & let them suffer a bit until they come on bended knee begging for our help. Then get the whole thing on video and in writing signed in blood.

  • Well, as far as I'm concerned, America only intervenes in foreign countries when there's a direct strategic benefit for them. I can't think of an example where the states went to war just to save a people. Anybody seen a Yankee in Africa?

  • "Anybody seen a Yankee in Africa?" Not a fan of history are you? Ever heard the Marine anthem? Where is Tripoli located? What about all of Northern Africa in WWII? Heard of Somalia?

    So as far as you are concerned, you are an ignorant twat. And really, a European trying to lecture Americans over Africa? You are still fucking Africa.

    Pathetic.

  • Tripoli is a city in Lebanon, but I'm guessing you mean the capital of Libya. :-) Libya has oil, and (used to be) very close with the commies. Something USA is not a big fan of.

    WWII. Please do remember that you only stepped in to the war because of Pearl Harbor. A mistake Japan surely still regrets. Roosevelt was heavilly critiqued for wanting to help the Nazi's enemies.

  • Somalia: Oil. Conoco, Amoco... They even used Conoco's headquarters as their main HQ. Remember how fast the states were out of there once it became clear it would take more than a little show to solve the big Somalian, Ethiopian puzzle? It's still pretty fucked up, so much so, that it's the only place on earth where my girlfriend (who works with Doctors Without Borders) hesitates to go to.

  • One thing you are ight about: the whole world is still fucking Africa. Only we don't pretend we can do anything about it by going in and killing some people and destroying a lot of stuff. I'm glad your president seems to understand that.

    Last but not least: I don't think you're an ignorant twat or pathetic just because I don't share your view of the world. Best regards, Karel.

  • Anybody seen any successful large military operations by any country in Africa?

  • Yes, the bush war in northern, then South West Africa and Southern Angola repelling a foreign enemy, Cuba, backed by the Soviet union who totaly outnumbered the African Country involved With no allies whatsoever, the Africans kicked their arses all over the place.

  • +++++18 sec to hard firing solution, like you and your imaginary brain could possible understand what a solution is. It took considerably longer to convince the "doubting thomas" government that it could be done and longer yet to get authorization to do it. Kind of like how long it seems to be taking you to get the hell off the youtube. You have been spreading your asinine ideas for so long that even I got the picture. Surrender to the inevitable your just wrong minded.

  • wavefool.

    "18 sec to hard firing solution"

    Last i checked it took the US military anyalists 6 months to plan this hit so blah blah blah fuck off dont message me.

  • How do you figure that yankee spastic boy?

    And how would you figure that as a bad thing?

    Germans out number USA exports 10 to 1.

    That meas they whopped your cowardy ass by 10 to 1,

    Notice the battle of the bulge where Britain was forced to save you USA cowards

    You daft yankee coward

  • If it wasn't for us, there wouldn't be a France or Great Britain, they'd be German territory.

    YOU brought us in the fucking war, wow ONE battle that wasn't as successful as we hoped. Guess who planned out D-Day? US! If D-Day wasn't successful, WW2's outcome would be totally different. Might I mention the Battle of Dunkirk where you guys had to be rescued by CIVILLIAN SHIPS! Notice I'm not bashing England with harsh words, ya know why? BECAUSE I'M STILL RESPECTFUL TO OTHER COUNTRIES!

  • Actually it was winston churchill that gave the D-Day the go ahead and also planned it. America only joined when THEIR transport ships got blown up. If only sweden supplied enough iron to Germany, Only then would tey have won... Americans tried to be smart by taking over Kiruna and take the iron ore back to US. dodgy bastards...

  • Well it was planned by Eisenhower, and please, please, for the love of god, do not join this. I really don't want a flame war. You seem like a nice guy, the other is just ignorant.

  • Oh and by the way, how do you know I live in the north? I could easily be in the north, in fact, I WAS BORN IN IRELAND. I still take offence to ANYTHING. I hate how ignorant people can be to others. America is the UK's biggest Allie so you should give them some fucking credit.

  • USA was the UK biggest ally during the years of Tony Blair. Tony blair was lickin' Bushes ass for him. Wotever bush asked, he got it from blair. EU is englands biggest ally (Mainly France)

  • I didn't vote for Bush, everyone hates that faggot except the south.

    Fine, were still close allies and you guys shouldn't act out towards them and especially not say something negative against an entire group. Its no worse than saying all Mexicans have 18 kids and Italians are brain dead or Germans are evil. I mean, I don't care who your saying it to or what your saying, its just wrong.

  • WereRabbbit,

    Keep dreaming you daft Irish filth.

    USA is Britains largest pain in the arse.

    USA=One huge great country of filth.

    A country who believes killing s the way forward.

    Thats not the British way proving USA is not Britains allie.

    Youre plain and simple USA filth.

  • I don't see Britian having technology like this. I don't see any European country or Asian country with a Missile system like this. After you catch up to us technology wise, you can come back and talk to the big boys. Until then go play in your little corner trying to figure out how to get rid of the IRA, probably the easiest terror group that could be gotten rid of.

  • Dude, now your hating on the Irish? Dude, your just a nationalist asshole. Your stuck up with your own country. You pick on everyone whos not british. Besides, you faggots tried to take our land, guess who failed to take it all? YOU!

  • Keep dreaming yank.

    The British soldiers mission in the Americaswas to save young female colonists from their virginity.

    And i believe it was a complete sucess.

  • I'm not talking about the Americas, I'm talking about Norther Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

    And I didn't go to America because I wanted to, I did because I had to. I'm just defending it because NO country who should treated this way.

  • Eh? Ulster That would be part of Scotland Where the terrifying filthy Scottish bastards came from Yada. I dont care. No country should "be treated this way" Last i checked USA slaughtered civillians in the highway of death. The mighty Osama Bin laden made sure USA would not go unharmed during 11/9 Youre backward yankee filth. Tell me the nationality of the last man that caused a massacre in USA Thats right he was Veitnamese You start a war iut never ends You in USA are FILTH
  • Military actions are not civilian actions. Go ahead and bad mouth the military, not the the whole country. There is one man in charge and we don't have control over his actions. We are NOT responsible, its the Generals and President.

    Don't drag the innocents into this mess.

  • On second thought, don't even blame the military, they're just following orders. Be pissed at the Generals and President, they're the ones in charge. We have NOTHING to with that shit. If one Mexican person murders someone, do we imprison the entire country? No, just the individual. I'm not trying to fight, I'm just trying to see through my eyes and have a non-biased view.

  • WereRabbbit,

    Thats the way.

    Claim USA doesnt have democracy.

    Claim its a dictatorship.

    What can i say.

    Thanks for proving my point.

  • The difference between Communism and Democracy is that democracy gets to vote. We do vote.

    Its not a Dictatorship, I never said they have power over EVERYTHING, they have power over the military. They give commands, the military follows it. Just like every other country.

  • You daft fucker.

    In communism votes are made.

    Get an education.

    Communism ist a dictatorship.

    If you ever got an education you may google "Soviet democracy/council democracy"

    Then you'll realise youre a slave for an illiterate ignorant millionaire.

    You plain daft filthy bastard.

  • I'm no slave, I could leave whenever I wanted.

    I would go back to Ireland but, unlike what you believe, there are some great people here and I don't want to lose them.

  • Communism is pretty much proven not to work. Look at all the past and current communist countries. They are all poor countries and shitty all around. It was the downfall of the Soviet Union which pretty much proved Capitalism beats Communism.

  • iownallsostepoff,

    You daft fucker.

    What are you a millionaire.

    A corrupted millionaire.

    Do you own a fucking jet.

    Fuck off.

    Communism has never been proven not to work.

    Youre simly owned by bandits.

  • Soviet Union- Communist Status- FAILED.

    United States- Capitalism Status- Still alive and kicking.

    Theres you proof you dumb fuck.

  • LMAO

    You daft fucker.

    What did USSR stand for?

    The United soviet socialist republic.

    The majority of countries in the woulrd today are socialist.

    Youre justa a plain damed filth yankee animal.

    Good t see youre to poor to rise above.

    that makes your former black slaves the better men.

    How does that make you feel Mr slave owner! LMAO

  • Just to let you know England used slaves just as much as the U.S did. Also you dumb fucker have you ever heard of the communist revolution in 1917? It was when the COMMUNIST party of threw the Russian Tsar.

  • Are you fucking serious beleiving that comment.

    "Britain used slaves just as much as USA did?"

    Ever heard of Bill Richmond a black slave taken back to Britain during the revolution where he fought for the championship of the world.

    And brought a pub and a gym.

    Name a single darkee in USA that did Anything like that in the 1700's

  • Phillis Wheatley- wrote the first book by an African American. It was published and sold in the 1700's.

  • Phillis Wheatley wrote a book in 1773

    Nad appears she wrote her poemsto the the king of england and its peole and not the filthy bastards in the USA.

    You dfat bastard.

    dh clearly saw britain as the almighy and you in the USA as vermin.

  • That doesn't take away from the fact that it was written in the U.S. You said name an African American who did something important in the U.S during slavery, and I did. Also your claiming we're filthy? HAH that made me laugh, also if Britian is so "almighty" why were they on their hands and knees begging the colonists to stop beating the hell out of their "almighty" army. You "dfat" bastard. Or did you mean "daft" shit, you people invented the language and you can't even spell properly.

  • That was a chinese satellite, they were worried about getting too close to jesus. The cloud that jesus rests on in space, which they have a contract with god to guard, was only like 10 miles from it. Too close for comfort, I guess.

  • "Compromised"... oops... did I let the cat out of the bag?

  • I just pray im on one of the super sonic hover carfts on is way to New York full of marines.

  • Amuzing how the queer US mods adjust my posts.

    It proves yanks have no democracy.

    50 percent of British losses in Afghanistan have happened in the last year

  • "technology in foreign hands"

    What a load of crap that is. This was target practice that ended with SPACE JUNK a much more serious threat then a burnt up satelite ending up in the wrong hands, besides the US military would be all over it before it hit the ground.

  • I think we should find an alien country and work together to destroy it!!!!!!1

  • US marines dont use civilians as shields... people are pretty crap shields against bullets and bombs dood...

    What they do do however under numerous troop testimony is shoot every civilian in sight if anybody takes a pop shot past them.

    So what terrorists are doing is popping off shots then dissapearing and letting the americans lose their own publicity war by allowing wet behind the ears, gung-ho, trigger happy [and also scared and inadequately trained] marines into largely populated areas.

  • v1s10naryman youre just a brain dead yankee.

    All yanks do is hide behind civillians.

    if they didnt theyd be wiped out.

    you call them terrorists i call them freedom fighters.

    You however being a homosexual cowardly yank wouldnt understand.

    You'd bend over and scream "Do me do me" if invaded.

    So your comment is worthless to me.

    I dont expect coward human trash to undertand a struggle.

    Hell youre probably a coward jew who ran and hid in USA during WW2

  • God knows what you are bu you're an ignorant twat with your head up your arse. I'm a brit and I'm anti-globalisation and anti the freemasonic jewish NWO... suck out knob head. I just am telling you the grass roots truth.

    The Commies and the Democrats are going to war it is prophecied planned and inevitable. And the west is going to win and kill a lot of people in the process.

    What ignorant aggressors like you dont realise is that they are both really the same side.

  • v1s10naryman

    Your opinions totally lame

    You claim NATO has the greatest this, that and the other yet fail to realise NATOs been exterminated and beaten in Afghanitsan.

  • what are you talking about??? they have implemented regime change in Iraq started the oil being sold off and they're stopping the muslims from regaining afghan...

    And the war is continuing in afghanistan but the afghan forces are still looking at losses of nearly 100 to 1. In the whole campaign in afghan the UK has lost only 150 soldiers so far.

  • <eh British losses 152.

    and counting.

    More than 50% of those in this last year

  • Do you really think the west gives a damn about democracy in afghanistan?? They've achieved what they set out to do which is build bases in strategic points and get their pipeline built.

    Do you really think they care about whether or not the taliban rule?? they FUNDED the taliban's training against the commies and thats why they're having a tough time routing them out now. They've FUNDED bin laden and allowed him to walk free everytime they could have had him because he suits their purpose.

  • I refuse to call them "commies"

    They are communists of which most are intelectuals.

    While USa's leader Obama is a son of a whore who had 3 husbands and father who had 50 wives.

    A guy who also admits to being a crack head.

  • so are the capitalists "intellectuals"... and they're all so "intellectual" that they are being played by occult philosophies from practitioners on both sides and being led like sheep into the bloodiest war this world has ever seen.

    The west is just waiting till 2012, 2013... then they'll have all their nuke defences up and running and they will use israel to become the agressors.

    And socialism may well be a great idea in theory but no man should rule another. It never works.

  • Who told you that shit? Last i checked it was the communists who were the intellectuals. A people who believe the cleverest should rule. While USA the shit hole has Obama a self convicted crack head sone of a father with 50 withs son a mother with 3 wives. Yeah right, Isreal as an agressor. Great idea filth. Kill millions for USA. I think not. Given the choice i would wipe you filthy yanks out for Cuba alone. Sorrry but its in my British blood. Freedom for all.
  • lol You're British??

    I feel ashamed... you're so THICK you can't even remember that I'm NOT A YANK. Twat.

    In fact you're so dumb just carry on talking to yourself bud... you've got your head so far up your arse it's hard to make sense of what you're saying.

  • USArCOWARDS;

    I bet you're another 12 year old bitch who thinks he knows everything about the USA.

    And to say you're Brittish?! GTFO of this country you complete arse.

  • Yeah thats right im 12.

    LMAO

    You brainwahsed yid.

    If i told you to bend over you would.

  • You honestly have nothing better to do?

    Christ man, I pity you.

  • amen to that adamc

    And UrC A marine?? Me thinks weak minded ignorants like him would never make it past the first stage.

  • v1s10naryman,

    I'm far to dangeorus to be in the marines.

    I would wipe USA out.

    Cutting each yanks throat individually without pitty or remorse until your leader said enough.

  • If it wasn't for USA, you'd be speaking German by now. So if I were you, I'd STEP THE FUCK OFF YOU PREJUDICE, NATIONALIST CUNT!

  • Comment removed

  • cowards is delusional. He has severe self-esteem issues & so makes things up to stroke his ego.

    Don't discuss anything with him. It is a waste of time. Just mark him thumbs down every time you see him.

  • no matter if you are for or against the mission.. you fuckers should support your troops.. they are giving their life to make your country safe so shut the fuck up and stop complaining.. if iraq is a disaster is caus of the fucking retard that was called president.

  • Yet the US army cant even control iraq.

    A country that had no weapons due to UN regulations.

    Dude. USA cant even beat a country with no weapons!

    Doesnt that ring bells in your head?

    In the real world it shows USa's military is pathetic.

  • Dude, get a life, the US is the most powerful country in the fucking world! Lets see other countires go into a country that has cities where you can barely walk, or even run. the USA is conroling iraq. and pretty fucking well kid. also, the US was accually thinking about what would happen if we did hit the sattlelite, when russia and china weren't you better shut your fucking mouth

  • cscmole if USA';s so powerful why was sadar city under seige for 4 years and still to this day a no go zone for the US military?

    Youre whats called brainwashed.

    Even with no weapons Iraq has managed to smack USA about like a little child on the world stage.

  • fighting insurgency is different from fighting armies.

    Fighting army demonstrates military might, shown in both gulf wars, and afghanistan.

    Fighting insurgencies demonstrates willingness to risk, sacrifice lives. Which the US currently is not obligated to do.

    Insurgents hide within civilians, making large firepower unusable in most situations.

    So looking at this kind of war, in no way reflects the strength of an army.

    Look how quickly Iraq was defeated, within under 2 months.

  • Fighting insurgency is fighting armies.

    Insurgency means people fighting agianst the soverign government

    And dont take the piss out of your self.

    All US troops spend time around civillians.

    So attacking them results in civillian deaths as well.

  • The insurgents don't hang around civilians, they hide where the civilians are, deliberately using them as human shields.

    The US troops don't use civilians as human shields.

    Being around civilians is different from hiding within a crowed of civilians.

  • LMAO

    You daft fool.

    Its no different.

    USA deliberatly use civillians as human shields

    Look in all the sniper videos.

    The USA coward soldiers are always hiding in crowds of civillians.

    You saying i say hiding.

    Whats the difference?

  • show me a video.

  • Why dont you look it up your self.

  • because I cant find any, and that i am not the one making the claim there is one.

  • hows that my problem?

    Try typing in Sniper in iraq and watching the flims of US troops hiding amongst civillians

  • the person making claims must provide evidence. theres so many videos about sniper in iraq.

  • Well try watching oe and you'll see Us troops hiding amonst civillians.

    The onyl way to kill them is to use snipers.

    Hense why there are so many sniper videos.

  • rly?

    watch?v=8DnqUBmUAgY

    no civilians here

    watch?v=KcLTWivDmIU

    none here

    So show me one where there are, or your claim is discredited for lack of evidence.

  • Are you daft?

    Try lookig for iraqi snipers.

    There are hundreds of videos of US soldiers hiding amonst civillians

  • so you claim, if there are so many, why is it so hard for you to post one?

  • Why not type in Juba and look for your self.

    And stop begging for me to hold your hand

  • I searched Juba, there is nothing on the first 2 pages of the results with US marines using civilians as human shields.

    How hard is it for you to post the link?

    You are making a claim, it is ur responsibility to back it up, not mine.

  • Youre just a daft fucker.

    I dont have to back anything up.

    Ive told you.

    You not being able to find US troops hiding behind civillians just proves that you in the USA are brainwashed.

    Where do you think the US troops are when they are in these cities of millions?

  • 1. Yes you do have to provide evidence for your claims

    2. Im not in the US

    3. Being near civilians is different from deliberately move amongst, and within civilians for the purpose of being used as human shield.

    US marines patrol along roads, search buildings, where as the insurgents hide within houses full of civilians such as homes, mosques, schools, markets, and many similar areas, it is situations like this, that causes such high collateral damage.