Benedict 16 alias Josef RATzinger is a FALSE JEW ! He is an ashkenazi who descend from Khazars false Jews who converted to the Talmud of Babylon in 748 AD by a law from their Khagan. They adopted the Hebrew characters but spoke Yiddish. They are NO JEWISH DIASPORA in exile ! This pope was a Nazi, speaks about NWO, wears insults to God and protects pedophiles with his lies !
Ap 2:9 and 3:9 both say false Jews = synagogue of Satan. History PROOVES Zionist false Jews act like satanists.
@911allo: Jew, you do not sound like a tough grizzled old soldier but some kind of dandified nancy boy, who is afraid of wars and you are indubitably no sea-dog but the sort of pasty landlubber I have always despised. I'll warrant, the most exciting thing that has happened to you limpid prawn in a whole year, was the day when you forgot to put sugar in your porridge!
@GreatGrumbledook : COPY & PASTE is the only thing this antisemite Zionist agitator can do ! She says she is from the very Zionist France and claims she can not write in french ! She is an ultra-right-wing xtrem atheist with a terrorist attitude excelling in the "Newspeak" language of Big Brother = Zion.
@911allo: You don't frighten me, Jewish pig-dog! Go and boil your bottom, son of a silly person. I blow my nose at you and your silly god-substitute Jehovah. I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!
@911allo: You cowardly rascal, nature disclaims in thee: a tailor made thee. Ay, a tailor, Jew: A stone-cutter or painter could not have made you so ill, though he had been but two hours at the trade!
@911allo: Ill-spirited Jew! Did I not send wisdom, knowledge and truth to you? And wouldst thou turn my sayings contrary? Misuse the tenor of my words? But if you will not understand, rebuke and dread correction wait on me and they shall do their office.
@911allo: No chance, Jewish bed-wetting type. I burst my pimples at you and call your god-substitude Jehovah a silly thing, you tiny-brained wiper of other people's bottoms! Yes, depart a lot at this time, and cut the approaching any more or we fire arrows at the top of your head and make castanets out of your testicles already! Ha ha haaa ha! And now, remain gone, illegitimate-faced bugger-folk! And, if you think you got a nasty taunting this time, you ain't heard nothing yet, dappy Jew!
@911allo: Jew, you do not sound like a tough grizzled old soldier but some kind of dandified nancy boy, who is afraid of wars and you are indubitably no sea-dog but the sort of pasty landlubber I have always despised. I'll warrant, the most exciting thing that has happened to you limpid prawn in a whole year, was the day when you forgot to put sugar in your porridge!
@911allo: You cowardly rascal, nature disclaims in thee: a tailor made thee. Ay, a tailor, Jew: A stone-cutter or painter could not have made you so ill, though he had been but two hours at the trade!
Thiswasatriumph, you and your wee wee will burn in hell for this. Demons will vomit down your throat three times a day (one hell day is ten minutes), you will be sodomized by Rosanne Bar every other friday, then burn some more. Then, you will be placed in an armbar by jesus himself until you admit that you "love him". Then, he will let you pass after a nasty case of the swine flu or some genital disease (he likes to focus on the tip area). Did i mention, he loves you.(modified George Carlin)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Th1sWasATriumph: You are obviously an uneducated, bigoted idiot who has closed his mind to the possibility that he/she could be wrong and the Catholic Church's teachings might be correct. You make an act of faith when you pretend to know otherwise, just as every religious person also makes an act of faith - something you mock - thus you are a closed-minded, utterly complete hypocrite. And you believe in censorship too! - I'm sure this post will be deleted. You're just another irrational bigot.:)
"You are obviously an uneducated, bigoted idiot who has closed his mind to the possibility that he/she could be wrong and the Catholic Church's teachings might be correct."
You're welcome to provide actual proof of the validity of Catholic teachings. Can you? Can you prove God? Of course you can't!
I don't go on faith. God IS possible - but so unlikely that it's pointless to consider without evidence. It is as likely as any of the other gods mankind has believed in.
You are well programmed. What is it like giving up your authority to something that "might be." There are many things that "might be"....Mother nature, Zeuss, Yoda. Why did you pick this story over the other stories?
Scott Hann, then proceeded to hold conversations with top presbyterian ministers in different parts of the world. He really wanted to prove Catholics wrong. The more he studied, the more he found out they were right and he was wrong. He gave up his job at the presbyterian university, and subsequently converted to the Catholic Faith. He teaches at a Catholic University and has written many books. The first one: Rome Sweet Home tells of the trauma of his conversion. Bochinchosa
I once promised you to tell you about any source that might interest you on this subject. Try reading Scott Hahn's Reasons to believe. This fellow was not an atheist, but he was raised a furious anti- Catholic Presbyterian. He landed the highest job at a Presbyterian university and was told to go sudy for his doctorate. He learned greek, latin, hebrew,, read all the works of the Fathers of the (Catholic) church looking for reasons to prove them invalid. Bochinchosa
Appeals to authority are ridiculous. For a start, why does it matter what a learned and intelligent man decides? Does that somehow authorise it as true? All appeals to authority I've heard revolve around the story of some eminent personage, often a scientist or atheist, who discovers God.
Additionally, Scott wasn't even an atheist. He was still religious. And that makes his conversion to catholicism a transference of belief as opposed to a genesis of belief. Far less compelling.
Scott Hahn & his wife are gleeful & well known members of the cult of Opus Dei........otherwise known as Ecclesiastical Freemasonry. He is a fixture on EWTN......the global Catholic
brainwashing network:)
Their 'faith' is in the institution & its administrators (for which they are well rewarded!).......not in God.
Now, if you really expect me to take appeals to authority seriously, you will have to do the same. If you think that someone intelligent converting to Catholicism is proof for God, you must also concede that someone intelligent DECONVERTING is proof for God NOT existing. And that would be ridiculous. It's not proof of anything.
I understand your opinion. It is quite natural since you have no faith. FFrom my point of view it looks very different. I think the real stupid choice is to assume there is no God when you have no proof of this. and to reject what scripture and history say concerning the existence of God on the grounds that they are stories gathered by people with no real validity. Even if you didn't like it, I'd say it would be wiser to investigate on the matter to decide on it. Bochinchosa
An inability to disprove something is not adequate proof for it. By your argument, you really should be believing in Allah right about now, because it would be a real stupid choice to assume he doesn't exist when you have no proof of this.
Why would it be wiser to investigate? I've had all the arguments you can think of fired at me, and none of them made any sense.
It is still a choice. God gave us a choice to love Him or not, because forced love is not love at all. He created all good and gave it to us. He wanted our love and obedience, that's all, but wiseguys that we all are or have been at one point or another, we thought we could do better without His commands. People are still doing this. Some see the light on time to straighten their ways. Others are in denial until too late. God is always ready to receive a repentant sinner. Bochinchosa.
Yes, it is a choice. A very stupid, very incoherent choice which is as bad as forcing us to love him in the first place. It is not a REASONABLE choice to say "believe in me and love me or I'll burn you" any more than it is reasonable to point a gun at someone and tell them to marry you. By having hell as a deterrent from apostasy, the belief inculcated is going to be weaker. And God would be able to see that, if I believed, it would be down to a fear of the consequences of NOT believing.
It is true that hell is described with fire and brimstone, and it must be so, because jesus himself described it so. But to me, (not just to Benedict XVI, not having God would be even worse than that. This world is not great shakes, and it is getting worse every minutge To live just for this without the happiness of knowing that God is here with me all the time, and knowing that He will be with me all eternity is heaven. Bochinchosa
Surely you have just conceded my point, that hell is a punishment for the apostate? I'm not with God and I'm pretty happy, so your personal perspective means nothing to me.
How could it be called a choice to believe in God when the consequence is either literally being consumed by fire in hell OR the horror of separation from him OR both? That's like offering someone a choice between eating glass and eating cake. The choice is there, but it's incoherent.
I see that you do not believe in God, and from what you say, you don't believe in the Bible either. I will let you know if I come across something that you might be interested in giving thought to. As for the question you pose of a God that promises hell to the apostates, I can tell youthat hell is the absence of God. The apostate chooses to live away from God, and god made him free. He can't have it both ways. Bochinchosa
Of course I don't believe in God or the Bible; I'm an atheist.
The concept of hell being apart from God is a nice one, but it's not so, and John Paul's recategorisation of the concept doesn't change that. Hell is described as a fiery terrible place countless times throughout scripture. The trend in recent times is to take a more abstract view, like the Mephistophelian "Why this is hell, nor am I out of it". As society changes, fear of hell is transmuted to something different.
So, to reclass hell to being an abstract state of absence from God as opposed to a place of fire and torment - which is the prevalent biblical view - the scripture has to be reinterpreted. Which raises a great many issues about its authenticity, and which other bits can be re-interpreted and held to be authoritative.
When I want to know a person, I try to learn all I can about him, preferably what he thinks and says. You have not bothered looking into what Benedict XVI says or thinks. You just labeled him a homofobe, which he is not. He adheres to strict morality in men and women as well, not because he hates either, but because he and all good Catholics believe it is the correct way to act, and pleasing to God. This extremely intelligent man has a lot to teach to people without prejudices. Bochinchosa
"When I want to know a person, I try to learn all I can about him, preferably what he thinks and says."
Well, that's just your method. Personally, when I discover that someone believes homosexuality is innately immoral, and that morality is objective, it kind of dampens whatever else they might say. And for this to be taken as true, you would have to prove the divine authority of the writings such perspectives derive from.
And, of course, most different religions adhere to their own strict morality and practices in order to please God. Do you condone all such things?
"he and all good Catholics believe it is the correct way to act"
The key word here is "believe". Belief is open to question, especially when it's belief of the nature that promises hell for apostates and condemns homosexuality.
What exactly does he have to teach people that isn't based on the assumption of an unprovable God?
With all the hogwash that is being presented through the internet as valid information, it is good that a serious line of information be presented to us, A lot of the people who accuse the papacy with hangups are merely proyecting their own hangups. I think this is a very good opportunity for everyone to get a glimpse of the truth. I want to hear it in English or in Spanish. Bochinchosa
Indeed I have, I have read one of his books and I keep in touch with his announcements at the Vatican. I have read his encyclicals: Deus cartas est, and Spe salvi. Have you?Spa Salvi Have you? Bochinchosa
Why did you ask "Have you?" twice? No, I have not. I'm not convinced I need to, considering the Pope is a homophobe, a moral objectivist and - lest we forget - head of the Catholic church, which is as ridiculous as any branch of religion.
If you can present any compelling evidence to negate these aspects of his character, go nuts.
Benedict 16 alias Josef RATzinger is a FALSE JEW ! He is an ashkenazi who descend from Khazars false Jews who converted to the Talmud of Babylon in 748 AD by a law from their Khagan. They adopted the Hebrew characters but spoke Yiddish. They are NO JEWISH DIASPORA in exile ! This pope was a Nazi, speaks about NWO, wears insults to God and protects pedophiles with his lies !
Ap 2:9 and 3:9 both say false Jews = synagogue of Satan. History PROOVES Zionist false Jews act like satanists.
911allo 1 year ago
The above FACTS either fit in this interpretaion or the interpretation is wrong.
911allo 1 year ago
@911allo: Jew, you do not sound like a tough grizzled old soldier but some kind of dandified nancy boy, who is afraid of wars and you are indubitably no sea-dog but the sort of pasty landlubber I have always despised. I'll warrant, the most exciting thing that has happened to you limpid prawn in a whole year, was the day when you forgot to put sugar in your porridge!
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GreatGrumbledook : COPY & PASTE is the only thing this antisemite Zionist agitator can do ! She says she is from the very Zionist France and claims she can not write in french ! She is an ultra-right-wing xtrem atheist with a terrorist attitude excelling in the "Newspeak" language of Big Brother = Zion.
AGITATOR ! YOU ARE PURE NOISE using lies !
C'est qui cette fausse anglophone la ?
911allo 1 year ago
@911allo: You don't frighten me, Jewish pig-dog! Go and boil your bottom, son of a silly person. I blow my nose at you and your silly god-substitute Jehovah. I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
@GreatGrumbledook I got the same stupid comment at least 11 times because you are STUPID or just get wet when using despotism ?
Zionist whores like you dear antisemite bitch. What is the number of this copied recurring comment ? 66 ?
I suggest you go pick new comments from GIYUS servers before people start to notice your just rewind and repeat the same things all the time !
911allo 1 year ago
@911allo: You cowardly rascal, nature disclaims in thee: a tailor made thee. Ay, a tailor, Jew: A stone-cutter or painter could not have made you so ill, though he had been but two hours at the trade!
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
@GreatGrumbledook : same comment again ???
I am tired of this one, Can you compose another NEW antisemitic one ?
Or are you a plain brainless MOSSAD or GIYUS robot ?
Why do you say your from the very very Zionist France and speak old english ?
How much do you charge for a fresh new lie ?
911allo 1 year ago
@911allo: Ill-spirited Jew! Did I not send wisdom, knowledge and truth to you? And wouldst thou turn my sayings contrary? Misuse the tenor of my words? But if you will not understand, rebuke and dread correction wait on me and they shall do their office.
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
@GreatGrumbledook : Orrifice not office dumb ROBOT
911allo 1 year ago
@911allo: No chance, Jewish bed-wetting type. I burst my pimples at you and call your god-substitude Jehovah a silly thing, you tiny-brained wiper of other people's bottoms! Yes, depart a lot at this time, and cut the approaching any more or we fire arrows at the top of your head and make castanets out of your testicles already! Ha ha haaa ha! And now, remain gone, illegitimate-faced bugger-folk! And, if you think you got a nasty taunting this time, you ain't heard nothing yet, dappy Jew!
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
@GreatGrumbledook Your a ROBOT !
You juste copy and paste the same unrelated comments over and over !
Are you a robot from MOSSAD or from GIYUS ?
911allo 1 year ago
@911allo: Jew, you do not sound like a tough grizzled old soldier but some kind of dandified nancy boy, who is afraid of wars and you are indubitably no sea-dog but the sort of pasty landlubber I have always despised. I'll warrant, the most exciting thing that has happened to you limpid prawn in a whole year, was the day when you forgot to put sugar in your porridge!
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
@GreatGrumbledook the same porridge comment again ? twice on the same video !
Your DUMB !
Your a ROBOT !
You juste copy and paste the same unrelated comments over and over !
Are you a robot from MOSSAD or from GIYUS ?
911allo 1 year ago
@911allo: You cowardly rascal, nature disclaims in thee: a tailor made thee. Ay, a tailor, Jew: A stone-cutter or painter could not have made you so ill, though he had been but two hours at the trade!
GreatGrumbledook 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GreatGrumbledook same comment again ???
I am tired of this one, Can you compose another NEW antisemitic one ?
Or are you a plain brainless MOSSAD or GIYUS robot ?
Why do you say your from the very very Zionist France and speak old english ?
How much do you charge for a fresh new lie ?
911allo 1 year ago
LOL the fucking Anti-Pope! Awesome! Maybe he will give responsible advice on contraception...oh and not help cover up for serial child rapists...
NoRegret0 1 year ago
Oh, man, that was hilarious!
(Stops to wipe off tears of laughter)
"The gargantuan thrusting c0ck of atheist debate"... priceless!
Loved the Anti-pope, too :)
Keep 'em coming.
therealbreadfan 2 years ago
HI thiswasatriumph, do you have a playlist for all these videos?? A playlist would be highly appreciated.
pobanmanu 2 years ago
lol,1 and 1/2 stars? jesus votebot i say,that was fuckin hilarious. fuck the pope in his stupid fucking nazi ass
ViralMessiah 2 years ago
The pope is a criminal.. he and his army of idiots must be stopped... they are a cancer on the world
DoctorE0 2 years ago 4
Thiswasatriumph, you and your wee wee will burn in hell for this. Demons will vomit down your throat three times a day (one hell day is ten minutes), you will be sodomized by Rosanne Bar every other friday, then burn some more. Then, you will be placed in an armbar by jesus himself until you admit that you "love him". Then, he will let you pass after a nasty case of the swine flu or some genital disease (he likes to focus on the tip area). Did i mention, he loves you.(modified George Carlin)
qigong1001 2 years ago 3
OH LAWD I REPENT
Yes, having hell as a consequence for not accepting God's love does somewhat negate the whole thing.
"If you believe any of it, you're a moron" - Dylan Moran
Th1sWasATriumph 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Th1sWasATriumph: You are obviously an uneducated, bigoted idiot who has closed his mind to the possibility that he/she could be wrong and the Catholic Church's teachings might be correct. You make an act of faith when you pretend to know otherwise, just as every religious person also makes an act of faith - something you mock - thus you are a closed-minded, utterly complete hypocrite. And you believe in censorship too! - I'm sure this post will be deleted. You're just another irrational bigot.:)
kinghitter1 2 years ago
"You are obviously an uneducated, bigoted idiot who has closed his mind to the possibility that he/she could be wrong and the Catholic Church's teachings might be correct."
You're welcome to provide actual proof of the validity of Catholic teachings. Can you? Can you prove God? Of course you can't!
I don't go on faith. God IS possible - but so unlikely that it's pointless to consider without evidence. It is as likely as any of the other gods mankind has believed in.
Th1sWasATriumph 2 years ago
"And you believe in censorship too! - I'm sure this post will be deleted. You're just another irrational bigot.:)"
Do you maybe have any proof for me believing in censorship? I've never intentionally deleted a comment on my videos. Nice try though.
Th1sWasATriumph 2 years ago
You are well programmed. What is it like giving up your authority to something that "might be." There are many things that "might be"....Mother nature, Zeuss, Yoda. Why did you pick this story over the other stories?
qigong1001 2 years ago
@kinghitter1 ... "I'm sure this post will be deleted."
1 year ago
Nuff said?
oilotnoM 1 year ago
The Anti-Pope! Brilliant.
I suppose he only eats Anti-Pasta?
DavidMTRutten 3 years ago
Oh, he eats normal pasta. But he HATES it.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
Scott Hann, then proceeded to hold conversations with top presbyterian ministers in different parts of the world. He really wanted to prove Catholics wrong. The more he studied, the more he found out they were right and he was wrong. He gave up his job at the presbyterian university, and subsequently converted to the Catholic Faith. He teaches at a Catholic University and has written many books. The first one: Rome Sweet Home tells of the trauma of his conversion. Bochinchosa
bochinchosa 3 years ago
I once promised you to tell you about any source that might interest you on this subject. Try reading Scott Hahn's Reasons to believe. This fellow was not an atheist, but he was raised a furious anti- Catholic Presbyterian. He landed the highest job at a Presbyterian university and was told to go sudy for his doctorate. He learned greek, latin, hebrew,, read all the works of the Fathers of the (Catholic) church looking for reasons to prove them invalid. Bochinchosa
bochinchosa 3 years ago
Appeals to authority are ridiculous. For a start, why does it matter what a learned and intelligent man decides? Does that somehow authorise it as true? All appeals to authority I've heard revolve around the story of some eminent personage, often a scientist or atheist, who discovers God.
Additionally, Scott wasn't even an atheist. He was still religious. And that makes his conversion to catholicism a transference of belief as opposed to a genesis of belief. Far less compelling.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
Scott Hahn & his wife are gleeful & well known members of the cult of Opus Dei........otherwise known as Ecclesiastical Freemasonry. He is a fixture on EWTN......the global Catholic
brainwashing network:)
Their 'faith' is in the institution & its administrators (for which they are well rewarded!).......not in God.
19lfm12 2 years ago
Now, if you really expect me to take appeals to authority seriously, you will have to do the same. If you think that someone intelligent converting to Catholicism is proof for God, you must also concede that someone intelligent DECONVERTING is proof for God NOT existing. And that would be ridiculous. It's not proof of anything.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
I understand your opinion. It is quite natural since you have no faith. FFrom my point of view it looks very different. I think the real stupid choice is to assume there is no God when you have no proof of this. and to reject what scripture and history say concerning the existence of God on the grounds that they are stories gathered by people with no real validity. Even if you didn't like it, I'd say it would be wiser to investigate on the matter to decide on it. Bochinchosa
bochinchosa 3 years ago
An inability to disprove something is not adequate proof for it. By your argument, you really should be believing in Allah right about now, because it would be a real stupid choice to assume he doesn't exist when you have no proof of this.
Why would it be wiser to investigate? I've had all the arguments you can think of fired at me, and none of them made any sense.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
It is still a choice. God gave us a choice to love Him or not, because forced love is not love at all. He created all good and gave it to us. He wanted our love and obedience, that's all, but wiseguys that we all are or have been at one point or another, we thought we could do better without His commands. People are still doing this. Some see the light on time to straighten their ways. Others are in denial until too late. God is always ready to receive a repentant sinner. Bochinchosa.
bochinchosa 3 years ago
Yes, it is a choice. A very stupid, very incoherent choice which is as bad as forcing us to love him in the first place. It is not a REASONABLE choice to say "believe in me and love me or I'll burn you" any more than it is reasonable to point a gun at someone and tell them to marry you. By having hell as a deterrent from apostasy, the belief inculcated is going to be weaker. And God would be able to see that, if I believed, it would be down to a fear of the consequences of NOT believing.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
It is true that hell is described with fire and brimstone, and it must be so, because jesus himself described it so. But to me, (not just to Benedict XVI, not having God would be even worse than that. This world is not great shakes, and it is getting worse every minutge To live just for this without the happiness of knowing that God is here with me all the time, and knowing that He will be with me all eternity is heaven. Bochinchosa
bochinchosa 3 years ago
Surely you have just conceded my point, that hell is a punishment for the apostate? I'm not with God and I'm pretty happy, so your personal perspective means nothing to me.
How could it be called a choice to believe in God when the consequence is either literally being consumed by fire in hell OR the horror of separation from him OR both? That's like offering someone a choice between eating glass and eating cake. The choice is there, but it's incoherent.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
I see that you do not believe in God, and from what you say, you don't believe in the Bible either. I will let you know if I come across something that you might be interested in giving thought to. As for the question you pose of a God that promises hell to the apostates, I can tell youthat hell is the absence of God. The apostate chooses to live away from God, and god made him free. He can't have it both ways. Bochinchosa
bochinchosa 3 years ago
Of course I don't believe in God or the Bible; I'm an atheist.
The concept of hell being apart from God is a nice one, but it's not so, and John Paul's recategorisation of the concept doesn't change that. Hell is described as a fiery terrible place countless times throughout scripture. The trend in recent times is to take a more abstract view, like the Mephistophelian "Why this is hell, nor am I out of it". As society changes, fear of hell is transmuted to something different.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
So, to reclass hell to being an abstract state of absence from God as opposed to a place of fire and torment - which is the prevalent biblical view - the scripture has to be reinterpreted. Which raises a great many issues about its authenticity, and which other bits can be re-interpreted and held to be authoritative.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
When I want to know a person, I try to learn all I can about him, preferably what he thinks and says. You have not bothered looking into what Benedict XVI says or thinks. You just labeled him a homofobe, which he is not. He adheres to strict morality in men and women as well, not because he hates either, but because he and all good Catholics believe it is the correct way to act, and pleasing to God. This extremely intelligent man has a lot to teach to people without prejudices. Bochinchosa
bochinchosa 3 years ago
"When I want to know a person, I try to learn all I can about him, preferably what he thinks and says."
Well, that's just your method. Personally, when I discover that someone believes homosexuality is innately immoral, and that morality is objective, it kind of dampens whatever else they might say. And for this to be taken as true, you would have to prove the divine authority of the writings such perspectives derive from.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
And, of course, most different religions adhere to their own strict morality and practices in order to please God. Do you condone all such things?
"he and all good Catholics believe it is the correct way to act"
The key word here is "believe". Belief is open to question, especially when it's belief of the nature that promises hell for apostates and condemns homosexuality.
What exactly does he have to teach people that isn't based on the assumption of an unprovable God?
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
With all the hogwash that is being presented through the internet as valid information, it is good that a serious line of information be presented to us, A lot of the people who accuse the papacy with hangups are merely proyecting their own hangups. I think this is a very good opportunity for everyone to get a glimpse of the truth. I want to hear it in English or in Spanish. Bochinchosa
bochinchosa 3 years ago
Have you even heard some of the things Benedict has said?
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
Indeed I have, I have read one of his books and I keep in touch with his announcements at the Vatican. I have read his encyclicals: Deus cartas est, and Spe salvi. Have you?Spa Salvi Have you? Bochinchosa
bochinchosa 3 years ago
Why did you ask "Have you?" twice? No, I have not. I'm not convinced I need to, considering the Pope is a homophobe, a moral objectivist and - lest we forget - head of the Catholic church, which is as ridiculous as any branch of religion.
If you can present any compelling evidence to negate these aspects of his character, go nuts.
Th1sWasATriumph 3 years ago
thunderpants has hangups from his childhood
popesoldier 3 years ago
overcooked swan
bwahahaha
thunderpants10 3 years ago