@Chuichupachichi Sorry, dude. You are misinterpreting the laws of thermodynamics here. There is always an overall increase in entropy over the universe, but in subunits of space, there can be a decrease in entropy, such as the transfer of heat from a hot environment to the ultimately cold universe. When ice forms, there is a decrease of entropy within the ice. Therefore, much of what occurs on Earth has decrease in entropy when it cools, transferring the heat to the rest of the universe.
Henry Poincare named the conception of "entropy " as a " surprising abstract " Lev Landau wrote: " A question about the physical basis of the entropy monotonous increasing law remains open " One physicist said : " The entropy is only a shadow of energy“ # History: Clausius : dS= dQ /T. Boltzmann : S= k log W Planck : h*f = kT logW The formula of Entropy is : h*f = kT logW Israel Sadovnik Socratus
How is entropy's effect on only isolated systems related to mortality? Besides that, entropy only effects isolated systems because, unless the system isn't isolated and therefore gets energy from an outside source, it's going to run out of usable energy. The potato cools down, and unless an outside source gives it more it, it's not going to heat up. Organism are isolated systems because, unless you get energy from an outside source, which is what food is, you'll die.
Does the second law of thermodynamics prove disorder is constantly increasing? And does that prove that the universe must have had a beginning? Explain. Thanks.
@Nervousification the second law of thermodynamics is a statement. It is not its own proof.
Whether or not that proves that the universe had a beginning is a difficult thing. This is due to the fact that it is also somewhat philosophical. Some people think time is circular, others think it's a bunch of big bangs that occur with time going in a straight line. Whatever floats your boat at that point.
@ichinarukurumaki I was just asking because many creationists use the law of entropy to assert that there was a definite beginning. I favor the "Big Bounce" theory, which would do away with the need for an absolute beginning via entropy, but I was wondering if entropy even reasonable points to a beginning or not.
How surprising is it that a you tube comment was based on the atheist/theist debate? I know right?!
{I favor the "Big Bounce" theory, which would do away with the need for an absolute beginning via entropy}
Entropy is irrelevant to the fact of time/space being finite. Einstein discovered that time/space is finite, with E=MC2. He didn't like it. Thus, he attempted to falsify his own discovery & later regretted having wasted his time & energy. When Hubble invited Einstein to Mnt. Wilson to observe his "red-shift" discovery, Einstein finally conceded to time/space being finite
This video simply demonstrates matters pertaining to Entropy. But they're irrelevant to whether the universe is finite or static. Creationists don't use Entropy to explain that time/space is finite. Entropy kills Evolutionary Theory because Entropy is the consummate killer. The common Evolutionist is taught that Entropy effects only isolated systems. If that were correct, then neither we, nor any other organism would ever die
Nobody disputes the future occurrence of the Universal Equilibrium
@Chuichupachichi Being that I am currently taking thermodynamics in college, I would like to let you know that your whole perception on entropy and evolution are completely wrong and retarded. Please, before you comment on something like this, do study thermodynamics and evolution in college as I have.
furthermore, an isolated system does not exist. It is only a model to describe things. Organisms are neither isolated, or closed. It is an open system. Because of this, organisms die and you fail
aka "Heat Death". Its going to occur because Entropy imposes itself upon the entire universe & everything in it. Thus, Cosmological Evolution could have never occurred because it describes a process that is diametrically opposed to the reality of the Entropic Effect. Abiogenesis is dependent upon Cosmological Evolution. Thus, it also never occurred. Biological Evolution is dependent upon Abiogenesis. Thus, it also never occurred
I just killed Theory of Evolution... its that simple. In order for Evolutionists to deny my effective falsification of Evolution, they must deny or corrupt the explanation of Entropy... the most repeatedly validated natural law known to science
"Procyclic Heat Transformation Theory" remember that I have the (C) copywright on the theory....eventually its going to be known who actually gave you the idea. I know you proved the math, but nobody actually understanstands "Entropy" in a quantum leap.
O.K. so S is a state variable in a reversible system. Then DS is zero in a cyclical process. Irreversible means irreversible in a physical, not a mathematical sense? So whenever the entropy increases, the process cannot run backwards in time?! State variable means dS is the total differential of S?
You need to do a series on Quantum Thermodynamics. Classical Thermodynamics is like Classical Mechanics is to Quantum Mechanics. It's a mile-high view of something which is really working at the quantum level.
you should also state that friction is another type of "inefficiency" which has NOTHING to do with the theoretical efficiency. To do a more correct version of this video, you should take rocks off, rather than pebbles (still frictionless). You should leave friction out of the discussion until the very end and state that real systems (engine), with friction cannot even get to the theoretical efficiency. Your use of friction in the videos is incorrect.
Thanks for your video. Very clear explanation.
10elozano 1 week ago
very interesting video thanks
willbirful 3 weeks ago
i enjoyed this vid
bribribri56 1 month ago
my brain started hurting by 1:41
Ultrasound700 3 months ago
i loled when the music started playing
KAKKAK0 3 months ago
i meant within the the water molecules that form the ice.
bardlehel 6 months ago
@Chuichupachichi Sorry, dude. You are misinterpreting the laws of thermodynamics here. There is always an overall increase in entropy over the universe, but in subunits of space, there can be a decrease in entropy, such as the transfer of heat from a hot environment to the ultimately cold universe. When ice forms, there is a decrease of entropy within the ice. Therefore, much of what occurs on Earth has decrease in entropy when it cools, transferring the heat to the rest of the universe.
bardlehel 6 months ago
socratus1 6 months ago
This would have helped me a TON when I was studying thermodynamics in college. I'll be sharing this as much as I can.
KhetNiu 7 months ago
A theory of origins debate on a thermodynamical entropy video? That's a new one.
TheJohnnyJohnster 8 months ago
How is entropy's effect on only isolated systems related to mortality? Besides that, entropy only effects isolated systems because, unless the system isn't isolated and therefore gets energy from an outside source, it's going to run out of usable energy. The potato cools down, and unless an outside source gives it more it, it's not going to heat up. Organism are isolated systems because, unless you get energy from an outside source, which is what food is, you'll die.
Nervousification 9 months ago
Does the second law of thermodynamics prove disorder is constantly increasing? And does that prove that the universe must have had a beginning? Explain. Thanks.
Nervousification 10 months ago
@Nervousification the second law of thermodynamics is a statement. It is not its own proof.
Whether or not that proves that the universe had a beginning is a difficult thing. This is due to the fact that it is also somewhat philosophical. Some people think time is circular, others think it's a bunch of big bangs that occur with time going in a straight line. Whatever floats your boat at that point.
ichinarukurumaki 10 months ago
@ichinarukurumaki I was just asking because many creationists use the law of entropy to assert that there was a definite beginning. I favor the "Big Bounce" theory, which would do away with the need for an absolute beginning via entropy, but I was wondering if entropy even reasonable points to a beginning or not.
How surprising is it that a you tube comment was based on the atheist/theist debate? I know right?!
Nervousification 10 months ago
@Nervousification
{I favor the "Big Bounce" theory, which would do away with the need for an absolute beginning via entropy}
Entropy is irrelevant to the fact of time/space being finite. Einstein discovered that time/space is finite, with E=MC2. He didn't like it. Thus, he attempted to falsify his own discovery & later regretted having wasted his time & energy. When Hubble invited Einstein to Mnt. Wilson to observe his "red-shift" discovery, Einstein finally conceded to time/space being finite
Chuichupachichi 9 months ago
This video simply demonstrates matters pertaining to Entropy. But they're irrelevant to whether the universe is finite or static. Creationists don't use Entropy to explain that time/space is finite. Entropy kills Evolutionary Theory because Entropy is the consummate killer. The common Evolutionist is taught that Entropy effects only isolated systems. If that were correct, then neither we, nor any other organism would ever die
Nobody disputes the future occurrence of the Universal Equilibrium
Chuichupachichi 9 months ago
@Chuichupachichi Being that I am currently taking thermodynamics in college, I would like to let you know that your whole perception on entropy and evolution are completely wrong and retarded. Please, before you comment on something like this, do study thermodynamics and evolution in college as I have.
furthermore, an isolated system does not exist. It is only a model to describe things. Organisms are neither isolated, or closed. It is an open system. Because of this, organisms die and you fail
fcdog555 9 months ago
aka "Heat Death". Its going to occur because Entropy imposes itself upon the entire universe & everything in it. Thus, Cosmological Evolution could have never occurred because it describes a process that is diametrically opposed to the reality of the Entropic Effect. Abiogenesis is dependent upon Cosmological Evolution. Thus, it also never occurred. Biological Evolution is dependent upon Abiogenesis. Thus, it also never occurred
Chuichupachichi 9 months ago
I just killed Theory of Evolution... its that simple. In order for Evolutionists to deny my effective falsification of Evolution, they must deny or corrupt the explanation of Entropy... the most repeatedly validated natural law known to science
Chuichupachichi 9 months ago
Does anyone know what his input method is for all his videos, it doesnt seem like a mouse...
adas1023 10 months ago
thermodynamics is cool
losdodgerz 11 months ago
I got a wife praise the Lord!!!
losdodgerz 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
YOU GUYS NEED TO GET LAID. FUCKING NERDS. FAGGOTS!
svengaligraves13 11 months ago
@svengaligraves13 dont get mad because the head between your legs is more intelligent than the one between your shoulders
MrRob412 11 months ago
@svengaligraves13 what the fuck does thermodynamics have to do with how often you get laid??
nosoupforyou99 10 months ago
Explaining everything well and clear! Thanks..!
TheeTankkk 11 months ago
thanks for u work,,, can we have some videos on exergy. i didnt find any video on youtube about it.
thanks
thedamgame 1 year ago
When Khan teaches he actual tries to bring some intuitive sense to the subject. I think this is the key to his genius.
chemdah 1 year ago
wheres the second law of thermodynamics??? :s
can someone plz post me the link ? Plz :s
dando0n94 1 year ago
entropy -or-Maxwell's Demon is the little carrot on a string out in front of the goat on the Little Rascals home made cart
rentatrip1 1 year ago
lady gaga
aqcpatrick 1 year ago
"Procyclic Heat Transformation Theory" remember that I have the (C) copywright on the theory....eventually its going to be known who actually gave you the idea. I know you proved the math, but nobody actually understanstands "Entropy" in a quantum leap.
cptcabo 1 year ago
O.K. so S is a state variable in a reversible system. Then DS is zero in a cyclical process. Irreversible means irreversible in a physical, not a mathematical sense? So whenever the entropy increases, the process cannot run backwards in time?! State variable means dS is the total differential of S?
bhigr 1 year ago
You need to do a series on Quantum Thermodynamics. Classical Thermodynamics is like Classical Mechanics is to Quantum Mechanics. It's a mile-high view of something which is really working at the quantum level.
Nomoreidsleft 1 year ago
you should also state that friction is another type of "inefficiency" which has NOTHING to do with the theoretical efficiency. To do a more correct version of this video, you should take rocks off, rather than pebbles (still frictionless). You should leave friction out of the discussion until the very end and state that real systems (engine), with friction cannot even get to the theoretical efficiency. Your use of friction in the videos is incorrect.
tdfridgen 1 year ago
It was perfect, well done! It really helped me!!!!
lmilimilimi 1 year ago 2
If you need help for this stuff good luck for the rest .. :D
Rakamonk 1 year ago
thank you. It helped
mono7891 1 year ago
does that mean removing a pebble = adding heat to system???
shinigami66 1 year ago
Aside from the theory...can anyone produce a practical example...
durchridan 1 year ago
Thanks Alot. It helped alot.
SilencerBlood 2 years ago
Sweet voice...
nemothecute 2 years ago
why is it that friction added only heat to the system and didn't add heat to that which the system was rubbing against to cause friction?
idster7 2 years ago
That would be called 'transfer of energy' from what particle to another.
SteroidsR4success 2 years ago
@SteroidsR4success i don't think you understood my question.
idster7 2 years ago
Haters.
Thanks for the vid. This helps a lot.
ThePathofHavoc 2 years ago 16
"kind of" count is high on this video
blackspoty2 2 years ago
thanks a lot for clarifying the reversible process! My physics textbook sucks! It needs more examples.
ricknitro 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
boil in hell
belialLiar 2 years ago
whats ur problem? Wut did he do wrong? This is a great video
Winxin864 2 years ago 18
@Winxin864 if you say so.
icanshoot06 1 year ago
@Winxin864 Two words: Theoretical science
Aerensiniac 7 months ago
BELIALIAR, yes u r right to call urself a liar and it is u who should boil in hell and not sal.
Yami7761 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Try typing more steady, really pisses me off
bitchslapper12 2 years ago