Wow dems are pawns if they believe obama's agenda is good for humanity here in the states.
The law has the right to erase you ,take away your kids,kill everything you believe in to promote thier quote"open mind " theory, and at the same token cater to you enough to keep your mouth shut.
Instead of engaging in this circle jerk, why don't you guys wait and see how this pans out. Obama might come out squeaky clean, or he might come out a bit sleazy. Patience, my friends. Patience.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Wait and see if tax increases work? Wait and see if imposing government regulations for the fiction of global warming/climate change will hurt us? Wait and see if pulling the troops out will cause mayhem in Iraq? Wait and see if government take overs of banking and car companies is a good idea?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
~~techNObama!~~YOU are the winner of YouTube's: "GOOB Of The DAY!"~~~for your post:~~you have no proof about lawyers "destroying liberty"~~was a LOL moment for a room full of non-lawyers!~~~let us count the ways~~~EXAMPLE ONE:~~Obama will push,pass, and promote the: ~~"Fairness Doctrine"~~which will crush any religious of conservative talk radio which does not AGREE with liberals and loons~~~anyone want to ADD ANOTHER EXAMPLE FOR TECH-NO!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
~~in our area~~the looney left voted in a law to deny businesses the ability to CHOOSE if they WANT SMOKING IN THEIR BUILDING?~~the one they OWN?~~and now cannot even allow their business to be the way THEY CHOOSE!~~ sorry non-smokers(me included) that is UN-AMERICAN!!!~~~ if you do NOT like smoke than STAY AWAY!~~I think passing LAWS that infringe on others own STORES and MAKE THEM DO WHAT YOUR MOB WANTS!~~is so pathetic~~it is a freedom we cannot give away!~next: Oprah makes us ALL HER CULT!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
~~well I THOUGHT Obama said in his first press conferance~~that NO ONE~~NO! HOW!!~~~NEVER!!! EVER!!!~~spoke to that Blago-ho-ho-snitch!!!~~none a Omamas peeps and none of his administration of table top stabbin lunatics~~~!~~now he back peddles and we will see the real Rambo that Obama wanted INDIDE the White House~~when ya lie down with dogs yer gonna get fleas~!~~please have Obama de-flead BEFORE HE GETS A DOG!~~its gonna get INFESTED RIGHT AWAY!!~~~~
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
*L* That code again... that prevents lawyers from being biased? Are you insane? How about your democrat lawyers who are in DC, elected, and ruined the banking industry with their shenanigans? And their 'code' didn't keep them from lying about who caused the problem, did it.
Uh - not all Congressmen were lawyers, hun. And it applies to currently active lawyers, those who are practicing. Finally, how exactly were the Democratic Congressmen lying about anything? You really need to take your meds. Oh, and reply like a normal human being instead of adding "new" comments.
No, it means you have a psychosis, since you are trying to "debate" without a point. Grow up, because I am not employed to take care of psychotics like you, and I have neither the time nor the patience to deal with psychotics like you. Please wait until the nice men in white suits come and take you back to your padded cell.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You're silly... I made my point most clearly. The point is, having Obama complete his own inquiry of hisself is indeed ridiculous, and you cannot defend it.
lol- you're nuts. I refuted your "point" through the prosecutor. It speaks volumes when you must pat yourself on the back every two seconds. You know you're full of bull, so you overcompensate by pretending you're the best thing since sliced bread. Like I said earlier, grow up, and learn how to speak english as well.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
stupid bastard, you poor, ignorant fool: You refuted nothing. You posted some fanciful fantasy about prosecutors, illustrated how ignorant you really are, and showed us all the likes of the fools that voted for Obama.
aww... poor little baby is getting angry. What I typed was not fantasy, but a reality regarding the disciplinary committee. Denying what I typed does not mean it's not true. Oh, and regarding your little comment below, I guess you like cussing out someone who you are attempting to bribe but will not take the money because they're "in it"? Grow up. There is no connection between the selling of the seat and Obama, and even your fellow Repubs know it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You mean telling it like it is, and identifying you for what you are is being 'angry?' *L* you have no idea. No, my ignorant friend, you are not astute, but rather ignorant, thinking that prosecutors are above bias. What a naive way to think - convenient too, in terms of your support for the least experienced man ever to hold the job. Voters' remorse is coming. Watch.
No, actually hurling names with no basis behind them makes you angry and psychotic. I never said prosecutors are "above bias", I just explained how they would be subject to discipline, either through the judge finding out or other lawyers, who are required to report violations, if they did in fact show bias. Also I was typing about THIS particular prosecutor. Your last sentences indicate psychosis - you should get that checked out.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It's not name calling, it's accurate identification. You ARE a fool. You ARE stupid! You ARE ignorant! Subject to discipline? Are you high? *LOL* You're utterly incapable of rational thought!
Wow - you truly ARE psychotic - you have no backing for your statements, and then come up with this bs rationalization? You need help. And yes, they are subject to discipline. Do you even know how to read? I have been typing about the Disciplinary Committee, which can yank your license to practice - so yes, they are subject to discipline. A man who is showing psychotic tendencies and cannot comprehend simple English is calling me incapable of rational thought? That's a laugh.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
When you end up writing posts about ME and not the topic? I win pal. You have no idea what reality brings us from the lawyers in this country who are ruining life, freedom and liberty across the board, and you ACCEPT Obama doing his own investigation on himself. You're an idiot, and that's not name calling.
lol - you're the one that pulled the conversation OUT of the topic, since you know you are full of bs about the topic itself. Lol - you have no proof about lawyers "destroying liberty" - that is actually just the most idiotic statement I have ever heard. Again, you CANNOT READ. I didn't just accept Obama's investigation, I also talked about the prosecutor - psycho, think for a second and stop lying.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What I did is NUKE your argument. That's the truth. Anyone who doesn't know that lawyers are at the heart of every trouble we face in America is not paying attention, or a lawyer themselves.
Oh yeah, and when you have to thump your chest and call yourself a "winner" online, you have already "lost" - like I said, only psychos who know they spew bs and not the truth have to pat themselves on the back and make up some kind of "win".
Oh yeah, and every time a lawyer puts their signature to a complaint on behalf of a client, they are certifying that they are acting in good faith, that they have a good-faith belief that they have a valid (doesn't have to be completely winnable), not fraudulent or frivolous, claim, or be subject to sanctions. There are also numerous restrictions placed on a prosecutor about what he can say to the public. The judge can easily determine whether anyone has violated these rules.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yeah right - more poppycock. How delightful. Lawyers are always acting in good faith... *LOL* Virtually every problem we face in this country can be blamed on lawyers. Lawyers by and large cause FAR more problems than they solve. Grow up, wake up!
Uhm - not more poppycock, it's the truth. You have no idea what the legal system is all about, yet you type about it? Look, this isn't about lawyers but about a particular case. There is simply no evidence linking Obama to any pay-for-play scheme, and you know it - that is why you're going off on these crazy tangents. So, focus on the issue at hand, and if you distrust lawyers so much, sue a company that has poisoned your kid by selling tainted milk from China on your own.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No nitwit, it's not the truth at all! I have a keen and accurate sense of the the legal 'system' and how it is systematically screwing over the United States and her citizens! Evidence? Have you SEEN the evidence, Mr. Legal Pant? .. .. .. Ha! Didn't think so.
Wow - like I said above, you ARE psychotic - everything you say is the truth, no matter how many facts to the contrary there are, right? There is no point in saying one word to you, because if it is not the "truth" to you, it is "not true" - and THAT is the definition of psychosis. Guess you can't read either, as I said there was NO evidence against Obama - so obviously I haven't "seen the evidence", since there is NO evidence against Obama to see.
lol - you STILL don't know how to read. I never said I haven't seen the dossier - I simply said, in response to your idiotic statement that I haven't seen any evidence about Obama, that there IS no evidence against Obama, therefore I haven't seen something that isn't there. Can you understand simple English?
lol - I know the basic facts, and you have no backing to any of your statements. There is no point in typing to you because you are psychotic, need help, and do not understand basic English, in addition to just typing the same thing over and over while drooling on your keyboard.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Good, if you are giving up, that shows yet again that I flayed you. It's not hard to see why I'm end up ripping pro-lawyer, Obamagasm-inclined nitwits apart.
Lol - no, you haven't flayed anything except your own brain. I simply do not like typing to people who belong in an insane asylum and repeat the same thing over and over again. We go around in circles, and if you cannot understand simple English, there is no point in typing. Let me ask you this - if you try to talk to a retard and they just repeat the word "yes", and you stop talking to them because all they say is "yes", does that mean the retard won? Didn't think so.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hardly. You need to get real. You assume that prosecutors are not biased, which, if you look at this prosecutor's record, is purely untrue. He's as biased as anyone. So... you're drinking koolaid my friend.
Prosecutors are not only subject to the same ethical considerations as lawyers and could be disbarred if they do not uphold them, but they are also held to higher standards. Secondly, Fitzgerald's record includes taking on both Republicans and Democrats. Keep drinking that Koolaid that says Democrats are to blame for everything and that the world would be perfect if only Republicans could be in power for the next 10-12 years. What happened to that permanent majority that Rove promised you?
Uhm - there is a whole Code of Professional Responsibility that addresses the ethical duties of lawyers, including Prosecutors. That Code also holds Prosecutors to a higher standard, due to the sensitive nature of their work. Like I said above, if they were to conduct an investigation in violation of these Rules, they could be brought up in front of a Disciplinary Committee and potentially disbarred. Political, as well as other, favors would not fly in such a situation.
lol - we're talking about an appointment vs. an election - Obama was elected to his Senate seat - it wasn't "up for sale" because there was no one person who held the ability to give someone the seat in exchange for money. Think about it for a minute.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Barack Obama release this report on December 23, 2008. Why Now instead of when the report was finished? Obama goes on vacation to avoid taking questions about the report. Unfortunately, I have to say this is a good political move by Obama because everyone is Christmas, or Holiday shopping. If this was Bush there would be an outrage.
Uhm - you DO know that Obama wanted to release it when it was finished, but the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, asked him to hold off for a week - please actually KNOW something about the story before you run your mouth about it.
So you basically want him to have manipulated and controlled the prosecution for his benefit? Because that's what you would have said if he had tried to get Fitzgerald to change his mind. The man cannot win - either he's "hiding something" by cooperating with the Prosecution and following their suggestions or he would be manipulating the prosecution if he did what you suggested. Stop being such an ass.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Typical, Don't dare question Obama, you might get insulted. So The Prosecution told Obama were going to release the report on the 23 and to avoid any question, Obama Goes to Hawaii, Rahm Emanuel goes to Africa to avoid questions. If Bush had to do an investigation of himself, I'm sure there would be an outrage.
Lol - never said you couldn't question Obama - just be a decent human being. Also, it wasn't that the Prosecutor said we'll release it on such-and-such a date so be sure to be away, the Prosecutor specifically told Obama to not release the info until the 23rd. Now, I don't know about you, but I'm already on vacation by the 23rd - boo hoo he's spending his Christmas vacation somewhere else besides Washington - big deal.
anotherfoolonthehill - whatever you are taking probably has a warning on the side of the bottle: may induce anal leakage...
President Elect Obama is cooperating with the government because that is what law abiding, intelligent people do. He has released information as he promised but did so on the governments timetable.
NewChristianSoldiers: You are an embarrassment to the Christian faith. Your lack of respect for your leaders are contrary to Christ's own words. Like Satan, you defile God.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I refuse to recognize Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States of America because he is not a natural born citizen and therefore ineligible according to the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court refuses to even discuss the many lawsuits filed by Philip J. Berg, Alan Keyes and many others. The media refuses to discuss it. Just watch some of the videos on my page. If you agree that the U.S. Supreme court should hear the facts and make a ruling then sign our POLL and "Friend Us",
A bipartisan multi-year congress led investigation finds that our current President and VP manipulated information in order to wage war with Iraq. How much airtime does this report receive? A single day.
An investigation clears the upcoming President of any wrong doing, and the media is still parsing and putting on a show.
Thank God the media told me that the media is liberally biased, because otherwise I'd think that they're biased towards selling whatever sells.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I wonder why these "multiple conversations" between the Pres. elect, his team members and Blago were never made public, like Blago's were, transparency?, change?, sorry to say so, but I don't see it.
The honorable thing for Gov. Blagojech to do would be to step down. He should consider the amount of tax dollars that will be spent on this investigation and/or on the potential for impeachment.
Wow dems are pawns if they believe obama's agenda is good for humanity here in the states.
The law has the right to erase you ,take away your kids,kill everything you believe in to promote thier quote"open mind " theory, and at the same token cater to you enough to keep your mouth shut.
antimantium 3 years ago
Instead of engaging in this circle jerk, why don't you guys wait and see how this pans out. Obama might come out squeaky clean, or he might come out a bit sleazy. Patience, my friends. Patience.
MontanaErik 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wait and see if tax increases work? Wait and see if imposing government regulations for the fiction of global warming/climate change will hurt us? Wait and see if pulling the troops out will cause mayhem in Iraq? Wait and see if government take overs of banking and car companies is a good idea?
What - are you just stupid?
dirkbag22 3 years ago
??? I Didn't see anything in this video on those other issues.
MontanaErik 3 years ago
Those issues make you uncomfortable... ?
dirkbag22 3 years ago
No. You make me yawn.
MontanaErik 3 years ago
typical of the ignorant left.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Obama's not even in office yet!
Obama gate!
iyzfr6 3 years ago
lol!! sorry but its true
antimantium 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NOTED: you refused comment on the 'fairness doctrine' which - like everything liberals give names to, is a complete lie in it's label.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
~~techNObama!~~YOU are the winner of YouTube's: "GOOB Of The DAY!"~~~for your post:~~you have no proof about lawyers "destroying liberty"~~was a LOL moment for a room full of non-lawyers!~~~let us count the ways~~~EXAMPLE ONE:~~Obama will push,pass, and promote the: ~~"Fairness Doctrine"~~which will crush any religious of conservative talk radio which does not AGREE with liberals and loons~~~anyone want to ADD ANOTHER EXAMPLE FOR TECH-NO!!
memama2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well done... it was so obvious... even the right to smoke a legal substance - tobacco - is infringed upon by lawyers...
dirkbag22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
~~in our area~~the looney left voted in a law to deny businesses the ability to CHOOSE if they WANT SMOKING IN THEIR BUILDING?~~the one they OWN?~~and now cannot even allow their business to be the way THEY CHOOSE!~~ sorry non-smokers(me included) that is UN-AMERICAN!!!~~~ if you do NOT like smoke than STAY AWAY!~~I think passing LAWS that infringe on others own STORES and MAKE THEM DO WHAT YOUR MOB WANTS!~~is so pathetic~~it is a freedom we cannot give away!~next: Oprah makes us ALL HER CULT!!
memama2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Exactly right. I'm not a smoker either, and to be honest, I like it that the bars and music clubs are smoke free - but IT'S NOT AMERICAN.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Chicago politics being what they are, there is NO QUESTION that Mr. Obama, either with or through his surrogates, is in this up to his ears.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
~~well I THOUGHT Obama said in his first press conferance~~that NO ONE~~NO! HOW!!~~~NEVER!!! EVER!!!~~spoke to that Blago-ho-ho-snitch!!!~~none a Omamas peeps and none of his administration of table top stabbin lunatics~~~!~~now he back peddles and we will see the real Rambo that Obama wanted INDIDE the White House~~when ya lie down with dogs yer gonna get fleas~!~~please have Obama de-flead BEFORE HE GETS A DOG!~~its gonna get INFESTED RIGHT AWAY!!~~~~
memama2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Obama is in this up to his huge ears.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
*L* That code again... that prevents lawyers from being biased? Are you insane? How about your democrat lawyers who are in DC, elected, and ruined the banking industry with their shenanigans? And their 'code' didn't keep them from lying about who caused the problem, did it.
code my ass.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
Uh - not all Congressmen were lawyers, hun. And it applies to currently active lawyers, those who are practicing. Finally, how exactly were the Democratic Congressmen lying about anything? You really need to take your meds. Oh, and reply like a normal human being instead of adding "new" comments.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
avoiding the point on purpose are you? that's another trait of the koolaid drinker.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
You obviously have no point.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if that means I decimated everything you said, you are right.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
No, it means you have a psychosis, since you are trying to "debate" without a point. Grow up, because I am not employed to take care of psychotics like you, and I have neither the time nor the patience to deal with psychotics like you. Please wait until the nice men in white suits come and take you back to your padded cell.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're silly... I made my point most clearly. The point is, having Obama complete his own inquiry of hisself is indeed ridiculous, and you cannot defend it.
Case closed, & checkmate.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
lol- you're nuts. I refuted your "point" through the prosecutor. It speaks volumes when you must pat yourself on the back every two seconds. You know you're full of bull, so you overcompensate by pretending you're the best thing since sliced bread. Like I said earlier, grow up, and learn how to speak english as well.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
stupid bastard, you poor, ignorant fool: You refuted nothing. You posted some fanciful fantasy about prosecutors, illustrated how ignorant you really are, and showed us all the likes of the fools that voted for Obama.
Thank you.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
aww... poor little baby is getting angry. What I typed was not fantasy, but a reality regarding the disciplinary committee. Denying what I typed does not mean it's not true. Oh, and regarding your little comment below, I guess you like cussing out someone who you are attempting to bribe but will not take the money because they're "in it"? Grow up. There is no connection between the selling of the seat and Obama, and even your fellow Repubs know it.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You mean telling it like it is, and identifying you for what you are is being 'angry?' *L* you have no idea. No, my ignorant friend, you are not astute, but rather ignorant, thinking that prosecutors are above bias. What a naive way to think - convenient too, in terms of your support for the least experienced man ever to hold the job. Voters' remorse is coming. Watch.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
No, actually hurling names with no basis behind them makes you angry and psychotic. I never said prosecutors are "above bias", I just explained how they would be subject to discipline, either through the judge finding out or other lawyers, who are required to report violations, if they did in fact show bias. Also I was typing about THIS particular prosecutor. Your last sentences indicate psychosis - you should get that checked out.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's not name calling, it's accurate identification. You ARE a fool. You ARE stupid! You ARE ignorant! Subject to discipline? Are you high? *LOL* You're utterly incapable of rational thought!
dirkbag22 3 years ago
Wow - you truly ARE psychotic - you have no backing for your statements, and then come up with this bs rationalization? You need help. And yes, they are subject to discipline. Do you even know how to read? I have been typing about the Disciplinary Committee, which can yank your license to practice - so yes, they are subject to discipline. A man who is showing psychotic tendencies and cannot comprehend simple English is calling me incapable of rational thought? That's a laugh.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
When you end up writing posts about ME and not the topic? I win pal. You have no idea what reality brings us from the lawyers in this country who are ruining life, freedom and liberty across the board, and you ACCEPT Obama doing his own investigation on himself. You're an idiot, and that's not name calling.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
lol - you're the one that pulled the conversation OUT of the topic, since you know you are full of bs about the topic itself. Lol - you have no proof about lawyers "destroying liberty" - that is actually just the most idiotic statement I have ever heard. Again, you CANNOT READ. I didn't just accept Obama's investigation, I also talked about the prosecutor - psycho, think for a second and stop lying.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What I did is NUKE your argument. That's the truth. Anyone who doesn't know that lawyers are at the heart of every trouble we face in America is not paying attention, or a lawyer themselves.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
Oh yeah, and when you have to thump your chest and call yourself a "winner" online, you have already "lost" - like I said, only psychos who know they spew bs and not the truth have to pat themselves on the back and make up some kind of "win".
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I didn't do any such thing - In fact, I said it with quiet humility, because I just hate being right all the time. It's a genuine burden.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
lol - you don't understand English, so you don't even know the word "right", let alone BEING right. Grow up.
technicschic 3 years ago
Oh yeah, and every time a lawyer puts their signature to a complaint on behalf of a client, they are certifying that they are acting in good faith, that they have a good-faith belief that they have a valid (doesn't have to be completely winnable), not fraudulent or frivolous, claim, or be subject to sanctions. There are also numerous restrictions placed on a prosecutor about what he can say to the public. The judge can easily determine whether anyone has violated these rules.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah right - more poppycock. How delightful. Lawyers are always acting in good faith... *LOL* Virtually every problem we face in this country can be blamed on lawyers. Lawyers by and large cause FAR more problems than they solve. Grow up, wake up!
dirkbag22 3 years ago
Uhm - not more poppycock, it's the truth. You have no idea what the legal system is all about, yet you type about it? Look, this isn't about lawyers but about a particular case. There is simply no evidence linking Obama to any pay-for-play scheme, and you know it - that is why you're going off on these crazy tangents. So, focus on the issue at hand, and if you distrust lawyers so much, sue a company that has poisoned your kid by selling tainted milk from China on your own.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No nitwit, it's not the truth at all! I have a keen and accurate sense of the the legal 'system' and how it is systematically screwing over the United States and her citizens! Evidence? Have you SEEN the evidence, Mr. Legal Pant? .. .. .. Ha! Didn't think so.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
Wow - like I said above, you ARE psychotic - everything you say is the truth, no matter how many facts to the contrary there are, right? There is no point in saying one word to you, because if it is not the "truth" to you, it is "not true" - and THAT is the definition of psychosis. Guess you can't read either, as I said there was NO evidence against Obama - so obviously I haven't "seen the evidence", since there is NO evidence against Obama to see.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You have platitudes, but no facts. What you say clearly is not true. You haven't seen the dossier, you know zero about it. Period. *L*
dirkbag22 3 years ago
lol - you STILL don't know how to read. I never said I haven't seen the dossier - I simply said, in response to your idiotic statement that I haven't seen any evidence about Obama, that there IS no evidence against Obama, therefore I haven't seen something that isn't there. Can you understand simple English?
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm telling you that you haven't seen anything, because clearly Obama is in this up to his ears, and you are denying the obvious.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
lol - I know the basic facts, and you have no backing to any of your statements. There is no point in typing to you because you are psychotic, need help, and do not understand basic English, in addition to just typing the same thing over and over while drooling on your keyboard.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Good, if you are giving up, that shows yet again that I flayed you. It's not hard to see why I'm end up ripping pro-lawyer, Obamagasm-inclined nitwits apart.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
Lol - no, you haven't flayed anything except your own brain. I simply do not like typing to people who belong in an insane asylum and repeat the same thing over and over again. We go around in circles, and if you cannot understand simple English, there is no point in typing. Let me ask you this - if you try to talk to a retard and they just repeat the word "yes", and you stop talking to them because all they say is "yes", does that mean the retard won? Didn't think so.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You simply have no knowledge of reality. And you're writing about me over and over again - I win.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
You are the retard in my situation, by the way, in case you couldn't understand what I was typing - which is pretty typical of you.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's all you got, 3rd grade insults. Nice work.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
I have given you fact after fact about the prosecutor, the lack of evidence, etc, while you have spewed nothing but idiocy.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You have no fact, you have platitudes and the way things might work if lawyers were honest people. They aren't. *L*
dirkbag22 3 years ago
I repeat again, there is no point in typing to you because you are absolutely psychotic and simply repeat the same things over and over.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So why do you keep typing, Mr. Inferiority-Pants?
dirkbag22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And this Obama cat, renting a $9 million home, and flying in a private chartered 767... this doesn't seem the least bit hypocritical to you?
Not at all?
stupid hypocrite liberals.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Obama is knee deep in this scandal.
ObamaScandals 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
did obama kill his grandmother to shut up this place of birth issue?
wdcsucks1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
there's a surprise. *L* He did HIS OWN investigation of himself. Wow, that's convincing. *L*
dirkbag22 3 years ago
And the prosecutor's investigation has not found any wrongdoing by him either. That IS convincing.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hardly. You need to get real. You assume that prosecutors are not biased, which, if you look at this prosecutor's record, is purely untrue. He's as biased as anyone. So... you're drinking koolaid my friend.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
Prosecutors are not only subject to the same ethical considerations as lawyers and could be disbarred if they do not uphold them, but they are also held to higher standards. Secondly, Fitzgerald's record includes taking on both Republicans and Democrats. Keep drinking that Koolaid that says Democrats are to blame for everything and that the world would be perfect if only Republicans could be in power for the next 10-12 years. What happened to that permanent majority that Rove promised you?
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
*L* You are steeped in Kool Aid.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
In what way am I "steeped in Kool Aid"? Please enlighten me, oh wise one.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You write as if you honestly believe that prosecutors and special prosecutors are above bias. Total nonsense.
The enormity of the Obama voters' remorse will be evident shortly. Watch for it.
dirkbag22 3 years ago
Uhm - there is a whole Code of Professional Responsibility that addresses the ethical duties of lawyers, including Prosecutors. That Code also holds Prosecutors to a higher standard, due to the sensitive nature of their work. Like I said above, if they were to conduct an investigation in violation of these Rules, they could be brought up in front of a Disciplinary Committee and potentially disbarred. Political, as well as other, favors would not fly in such a situation.
technicschic 3 years ago
Niiiiiiiiiiiiice.
utubesucks2003 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Obama had his hand out.How do you think Obama got that senate seat? He bought it.
micsc50 3 years ago
lol - we're talking about an appointment vs. an election - Obama was elected to his Senate seat - it wasn't "up for sale" because there was no one person who held the ability to give someone the seat in exchange for money. Think about it for a minute.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Barack Obama release this report on December 23, 2008. Why Now instead of when the report was finished? Obama goes on vacation to avoid taking questions about the report. Unfortunately, I have to say this is a good political move by Obama because everyone is Christmas, or Holiday shopping. If this was Bush there would be an outrage.
asd161 3 years ago
Uhm - you DO know that Obama wanted to release it when it was finished, but the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, asked him to hold off for a week - please actually KNOW something about the story before you run your mouth about it.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What Obama couldn't convince the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald to release the report earlier?
asd161 3 years ago
So you basically want him to have manipulated and controlled the prosecution for his benefit? Because that's what you would have said if he had tried to get Fitzgerald to change his mind. The man cannot win - either he's "hiding something" by cooperating with the Prosecution and following their suggestions or he would be manipulating the prosecution if he did what you suggested. Stop being such an ass.
technicschic 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Typical, Don't dare question Obama, you might get insulted. So The Prosecution told Obama were going to release the report on the 23 and to avoid any question, Obama Goes to Hawaii, Rahm Emanuel goes to Africa to avoid questions. If Bush had to do an investigation of himself, I'm sure there would be an outrage.
asd161 3 years ago
Lol - never said you couldn't question Obama - just be a decent human being. Also, it wasn't that the Prosecutor said we'll release it on such-and-such a date so be sure to be away, the Prosecutor specifically told Obama to not release the info until the 23rd. Now, I don't know about you, but I'm already on vacation by the 23rd - boo hoo he's spending his Christmas vacation somewhere else besides Washington - big deal.
technicschic 3 years ago
anotherfoolonthehill - whatever you are taking probably has a warning on the side of the bottle: may induce anal leakage...
President Elect Obama is cooperating with the government because that is what law abiding, intelligent people do. He has released information as he promised but did so on the governments timetable.
NewChristianSoldiers: You are an embarrassment to the Christian faith. Your lack of respect for your leaders are contrary to Christ's own words. Like Satan, you defile God.
marleyinoc 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I refuse to recognize Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States of America because he is not a natural born citizen and therefore ineligible according to the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court refuses to even discuss the many lawsuits filed by Philip J. Berg, Alan Keyes and many others. The media refuses to discuss it. Just watch some of the videos on my page. If you agree that the U.S. Supreme court should hear the facts and make a ruling then sign our POLL and "Friend Us",
NewChristianSoldiers 3 years ago
Let's see here.
A bipartisan multi-year congress led investigation finds that our current President and VP manipulated information in order to wage war with Iraq. How much airtime does this report receive? A single day.
An investigation clears the upcoming President of any wrong doing, and the media is still parsing and putting on a show.
Thank God the media told me that the media is liberally biased, because otherwise I'd think that they're biased towards selling whatever sells.
secondgate 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I wonder why these "multiple conversations" between the Pres. elect, his team members and Blago were never made public, like Blago's were, transparency?, change?, sorry to say so, but I don't see it.
giampow1 3 years ago
I live in illinois and all the politicians are corrupt.
malikah36 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I wonder how much Obama paid for his senate seat?
freedomintheus 3 years ago
its all a plan of republicans....blogorvech will stay in power so you better watch your mouth
christopherspeedy 3 years ago
Corruption will end the days of old style politics as usual Illinois style.
OnenessNow 3 years ago
i hope blagoyavitch goes to jail...
pyromcr 3 years ago 3
The honorable thing for Gov. Blagojech to do would be to step down. He should consider the amount of tax dollars that will be spent on this investigation and/or on the potential for impeachment.
How do the people of Illinois feel?
CityofDestiny 3 years ago 5